Most of these traditions are now a part of history (and in most cases that is a good thing) and most are considered barbaric or evil. Yet some of them have only stopped recently. This is the list of the top 10 bizarre traditions that are now mostly lost to mankind. Warning: Contains adult material.
The full traditions of the Geisha have now been replaced with a modern system. Once Geisha were plentiful in number. In 1900s, there were over 25,000 geisha. In the early 1930s, there were 80,000 geisha. Most geisha were in Kyoto, the old capital city of Japan. Nowadays, there are less than 10,000 geisha left. In Tokyo, there are only 100 geisha left. However, true geisha are much more rare. Modern geisha are not bought from poor families and brought into the geisha house as children. Becoming a geisha is now entirely voluntary, and women who are not the children of geisha can now become geisha. However the training remains as rigourous as before. Young girls have to be very committed to learn the art of traditional Japanese dancing, singing, music, and much more.
Traditional Geisha did not offer the services of prostitution, though some modern ones are rumored to.
As practised from the 15th to 20th centuries in Western societies, a duel was a consensual fight between two people, with matched deadly weapons, in accordance with rules explicitly or implicitly agreed upon, over a point of honor, usually accompanied by a trusted representative (who might themselves fight), and in contravention of the law.
The duel usually developed out of the desire of one party (the challenger) to redress a perceived insult to his honor. The goal of the duel was not so much to kill the opponent as to gain “satisfaction,” i.e., to restore one’s honor by demonstrating a willingness to risk one’s life for it.
Duels could be fought with some sort of sword or, from the 18th Century on, with pistols. For this end special sets of duelling pistols were crafted for the wealthiest of noblemen. After the offence, whether real or imagined, the offended party would demand “satisfaction” from the offender, signalling this demand with an inescapably insulting gesture, such as throwing the glove before him, hence the phrase “throwing down the gauntlet”.
First off, in case you are confused, the photograph above is of a male Eunich. A eunuch is a castrated man; the term usually refers to those castrated in order to perform a specific social function, as was common in many societies of the past. In ancient China castration was both a traditional punishment (until the Sui Dynasty) and a means of gaining employment in the Imperial service. At the end of the Ming Dynasty there were 70,000 eunuchs in the Imperial palace. The value of such employment—certain eunuchs gained immense power that may have superseded that of the prime ministers—was such that self-castration had to be made illegal. The number of eunuchs in Imperial employ had fallen to 470 in 1912, when their employment ceased
Eunuchs castrated before puberty were also valued and trained in several cultures for their exceptional voices, which retained a childlike and other-worldly flexibility and treble pitch. Such eunuchs were known as castrati. Unfortunately the choice had to be made at an age when the boy would not yet be able to consciously choose whether to sacrifice his sexual potency, and there was no guarantee that the voice would remain of musical excellence after the operation. You can read more about castrati here.
Play / Download an MP3 of a true castrato – taken from Top 10 Incredible Recordings.
The photograph here shows a group of concubines standing behind their protectors (usually Eunuchs). Concubinage is the state of a woman or youth in an ongoing, quasi-matrimonial relationship with a man of higher social status. Typically, the man has an official wife in addition to one or more concubines. Concubines have limited rights of support from the man, and their offspring are publicly acknowledged as the man’s children, albeit of lower status than children born by the official wife or wives.
Historically, concubinage was frequently voluntary (by the girl and/or her family’s arrangement), as it provided a measure of economic security for the woman involved. Involuntary, or servile, concubinage sometimes involves sexual slavery of one member of the relationship, typically the woman.
Seppuku (Hara-Kiri) was a key part of bushido, the code of the samurai warriors; it was used by warriors to avoid falling into enemy hands, and to attenuate shame. Samurai could also be ordered by their daimyo (feudal lords) to commit seppuku. Later, disgraced warriors were sometimes allowed to commit seppuku rather than be executed in the normal manner. Since the main point of the act was to restore or protect one’s honor as a warrior, those who did not belong to the samurai caste were never ordered or expected to commit seppuku. Samurai women could only commit the act with permission.
A Samurai was bathed, dressed in white robes, fed his favorite meal, and when he was finished, his instrument was placed on his plate. Dressed ceremonially, with his sword placed in front of him and sometimes seated on special cloths, the warrior would prepare for death by writing a death poem. With his selected attendant (kaishakunin, his second) standing by, he would open his kimono (clothing), take up his tantō (knife) and plunge it into his abdomen, making a left-to-right cut. The kaishakunin would then perform daki-kubi, a cut in which the warrior was all but decapitated (a slight band of flesh is left attaching the head to the body).
Human sacrifice is the act of killing a human being for the purposes of making an offering to a deity or other, normally supernatural, power. It was practiced in many ancient cultures. The practice has varied between different cultures, with some like the Mayans and Aztecs being notorious for their ritual killings, while others have looked down on the practice as primitive. Victims were ritually killed in a manner that was supposed to please or appease gods or spirits. Victims ranged from prisoners to infants to Vestal Virgins, who suffered such fates as burning, beheading and being buried alive.
Over time human sacrifice has become less common around the world, and sacrifices are now very rare. Most religions condemn the practice and present-day laws generally treat it as a criminal matter. Nonetheless it is still occasionally seen today, especially in the least developed areas of the world where traditional beliefs persist.
Footbinding was a custom practised on young females for approximately one thousand years in China, beginning in the 10th century and ending in the early 20th century. In Chinese foot binding, young girls’ feet, usually at age 6 but often earlier, were wrapped in tight bandages so that they could not grow and develop normally; they would, instead, break and become highly deformed, not growing past 4-6 inches (10-15 cm). Today, it is a prominent cause of disability among some elderly Chinese women.
First, each foot would be soaked in a warm mixture of herbs and animal blood. This concoction caused any necrotised flesh to fall off. Then her toenails were cut back as far as possible to prevent ingrowth and subsequent infections. To prepare her for what was to come next the girl’s feet were delicately massaged. Silk or cotton bandages, ten feet long and two inches wide, were prepared by soaking in the same blood and herb mix as before. Each of the toes were then broken and wrapped in the wet bandages, which would constrict when drying, and pulled tightly downwards toward the heel. There may have been deep cuts made in the sole to facilitate this. You can read more about the terrible practice of foot binding here.
Sati was a Hindu funeral custom, now very rare and a serious criminal act in India, in which the dead man’s widow would throw herself on her husband’s funeral pyre in order to commit suicide. The act of sati was supposed to take place voluntarily, and from the existing accounts, most of them were indeed voluntary. The act may have been expected of widows in some communities. The extent to which any social pressures or expectations should be considered as compulsion has been the matter of much debate in modern times. It is frequently stated that a widow could expect little of life after her husband’s death, especially if she was childless. However, there were also instances where the wish of the widow to commit sati was not welcomed by others, and where efforts were made to prevent the death.
Sokushinbutsu were Buddhist monks or priests who allegedly caused their own deaths in a way that resulted in their being mummified. This practice reportedly took place almost exclusively in northern Japan around the Yamagata Prefecture. Between 16 and 24 such mummifications have been discovered.
For three years the priests would eat a special diet consisting only of nuts and seeds, while taking part in a regimen of rigorous physical activity that stripped them of their body fat. They then ate only bark and roots for another three years and began drinking a poisonous tea made from the sap of the Urushi tree, normally used to lacquer bowls. This caused vomiting and a rapid loss of bodily fluids, and most importantly, it killed off any maggots that might cause the body to decay after death. Finally, a self-mummifying monk would lock himself in a stone tomb barely larger than his body, where he would not move from the lotus position. His only connection to the outside world was an air tube and a bell. Each day he rang a bell to let those outside know that he was still alive. When the bell stopped ringing, the tube was removed and the tomb sealed. You can read more about this practice here.
Sky burial or ritual dissection was once a common practice in Tibet. A human corpse is cut into small pieces and placed on a mountaintop, exposing it to the elements and animals – especially to birds of prey. In one account, the leading mok cut off the limbs and hacked the body to pieces, handing each part to his assistants, who used rocks to pound the flesh and bones together to a pulp, which they mixed with tsampa (barley flour with tea and yak butter or milk) before the vultures were summoned to eat.
In several accounts, the flesh was stripped from the bones and given to vultures without further preparation; the bones then were broken up with sledgehammers, and usually mixed with tsampa before being given to the vultures. In another account, vultures were given the whole body. When only the bones remained, they were broken up with mallets, ground with tsampa, and given to crows and hawks that had waited until the vultures had departed.
The Communist government of China outlawed it in the 1960s so it was nearly a lost tradition, but they legalised it again in the 1980s.
The photograph above was taken by Rotem Eldar and you can see more rare photographs on his site here. WARNING: These photos are graphic.






























Ok, I’ll bite, if Geisha didn’t involve *****, then, WTF is the POINT?!?!?! I thought concubines were for ***** also, damn I must be horny or something…
Geisha’s were entertainer’s,can’t u be that simple bout things =3=”.
Castration is painful for anyone involved thats it….
Karina – “Modern geishas are not prostitutes, nor would I say that even ’some’ are, either.”
I guess it depends on how liberally you want to define the term “prostitute” or how emotive you want to be about it. There is no doubt that a geisha having a patron who offered financial support whilst maintaining a *****ual relationship with her was not uncommon. That is not to say all geisha lived in this manner…but how else do you describe the role of the geisha in these circumstances ?
Or maybe this only applied in the distant past ?
Incidentally, you are probably right about the stereotyping, but I don’t see why this is something to be “appalled” about…
i don’t think anyones been a prostitute in this commentary includin me lol, so we don’t even really have the right to suggest bout it anyways unless we’ve been through it…..
should learn more before to type….
Very Interesting, Asia Has Some Weird, But Very interesting Customs, Thanks For The List Another Good One!!
If I recall, the purpose of eunuchs was mainly to act as harem keepers and guards for the master’s wives/concubines. They were castrated so that they posed no threat (i.e. not wanting to have ***** with the master’s women, no genitalia, no problem).
it was more to keep away from the emperor’s wives and concubines, also the emperor feared that the children from his wives and concubine that were born were his. the emperor also feared to be over ruled hence castration….don’t ave the balls to take over lol
They’re all strange and yet there are things that are still done like beheadings by a certain group of religious fanatics. I noticed a comment about stereotyping geishas too. Nobody stereotyped anyone, it’s a common western misconception but not a stereotype. This is all just proof of human stupidity. As a species we elevate ourselves to a level that we’re nowhere near when it comes to our actually intelligence compared to perceived intelligence.
Ew, foot binding.
Re: #3
Castration doesn`t necessarily mean penilectomy.
“Unfortunately the choice had to be made at an age when the boy would not yet be able to consciously choose whether to sacrifice his *****ual potency, and there was no guarantee that the voice would remain of musical excellence after the operation.”
The boys lost their fertility, not potency. Some of the castrati (who were rock stars of their time) had wild ***** lives. Sometimes the husbands of the ladies involved didn`t believe it, because they didn`t understand that a castrato`s genitals were still functional. You seem to make the same mistake.
that picture on #9 is NOT a Geisha! Her kimono is to short, her make up isn’t right, the hairstyle is wrong, she isn’t wearing the proper shoes. so yeh you should fix it
71. EvilMe
Published on August 12, 2007 so this is an older list. so there may’ve been issues re: images used. hopefully the text makes up for the picture.
I wish I was in better shape, I would like to start Sky Burials in the united states.
Like others here I agree, what a waste of land to bury people.
How many times do they dig up and move Grave yards?
I would like to be gone the same way, the idea of being buried in a box or cremated does not sound good to me.
I like the idea of being laid out in the sun in the mountains and then let the birds do there thing.
Also those who would not want to see it would not have too.
lol aye it is nice to have sky burials i guess
….u make it sound like a holiday ^^.
maybe graveyards in the end r the attatchments to those who r alive and who remember u….i mean the reason to say that is because of sky burials and the tibetan way of finkin. sigh who knows…
I think this is an interesting list! I want to know more! I’m so glad that (for the most part) humans have advanced in traditions. I would hate to live back when there was feet binding!! I feel so bad for the castration of males! And I don’t feel bad for guys that have been circumcised! It still feels way better for men than women!!!
Cool article, but how is Geisha a strange tradition? The concept exists in virtually every culture, under different names, “courtesans”, “gypsies”, “bar maids”. What’s so odd about that?
I find it curious that the much more bizarre and cruel “tradition” (or better horrendous crime) of male genital mutilation is omitted.
It must be that one person’s mark of Chaim is another persons genital mutilation.
Circumcision is by far one of mankind’s oddest and cruelest practices.
Circumcision does not even BEGIN to compare to female genital mutilation. That is the most disgusting practice that is still in existence today.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/05/FGC_Types.jpg/548px-FGC_Types.jpg
Sick.
It depends what you’re comparing. In severity, the worst of male genital cutting is worse than the mildest of female genital cutting. The death rate, comparing like with like, is probably comparable – nearly 40 males a year 2000-2005 in Eastern Cape Province alone. As human rights violations, they are equivalent. The only reason male cutting is defended is that we do it. To see female cutting defended with equal eloquence, read Indonesian blogs. Both are evil, both should be abolished.
female genital mutilations has been practiced by CHristians, Jews and Muslims alike tho it is not sanctioned by any of those religions. It is more of a tradition practiced most commonly in AFrica in countries like Somalia, Eritrea and the like. There are rare cases in Egypt mainly among uneducated villagers. The point is to promote chastity of women so they remain virgins thus making them ‘marriage material’. The idea is that if she cannot enjoy *****ual pleasure, she will not sin (pre-marital ***** or adultery).
It is illegal in almost all if not all Muslim countries.. It is not allowed to be performed even in more ‘extreme’ countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia or Pakistan. In any case it is a gruesome practice and there should be more done to educate people in these places about the effects of it to women physically and psychologically.
PityTheNation: “There are rare cases in Egypt mainly among uneducated villagers.” According to WHO (http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/fgm/fig1.htm) the prevalence in Egypt among women aged 15-49 is 97%. “It is illegal in almost all if not all Muslim countries.” It is certainly not illegal in Indonesia. Here (http://www.indonesiamatters.com/1626/fgm/) you’ll see professors openly saying it is neither required nor forbidden.
So when PityTheNation says “It is illegal in almost all if not all Muslim countries.” excuse me if I don’t instantly believe it.
Why not just say “genital cutting”? It’s bizarre on whomever it’s done.
I don’t think that there needs to be an argument over which genital mutilation is worse. As a woman, I would think that most female circumcision is worse, mostly because it is forced without any anesthetic. But when a male baby is circumcised, I would think the hospital would make sure that the baby doesn’t feel anything.
BUT, and this is a bit BUT, I could be wrong. Either way, both are horrible, so why argue which is worse?
By the way, I love the list
“…when a male baby is circumcised, I would think the hospital would make sure that the baby doesn’t feel anything.” You would, wouldn’t you, but until very recently, anaesthetic was not used at all, and it is still far from universal. (They just make sure the circumcising room is soundproof and/or far from the parents.) There are risks (methaemoglobinaemia!) with anaesthetics on newborn babies, and the myth is still widespread that “babies don’t feel pain”. The baby still has the pain of urine in the wound for the next two weeks or so.
“Either way, both are horrible, so why argue which is worse?” EXACTLY. Just list “Genital cutting”.
Female genital mutilation is by far the most tragic and horrible tradition. I don’t see how women who know what it feels like can help hold down the girls getting it done.
Just wanted to talk about the male circumcision thing I myself am circumcised and I haven’t researched it at all because frankly I don’t give a ***** all I know is I have great ***** and frequently so your theory about lowered ***** drive is probally incorrect and I wouldn’t want to not be circumcised because it looks so ugly
“I have great ***** and frequently so your theory about lowered ***** drive is probally incorrect” I don’t think anyone says it reduces drive. Cutting the most sensitive part of the genitals off reduces the quality. Glad you have great *****. “Great” is not as good as it gets.
“I wouldn’t want to not be circumcised because it looks so ugly”. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. So is ugly. That’s why we don’t normally go making permanent changes to other people’s bodies for aesthetic reasons alone.
umm at least its better than castration lmao. not that i have been circumsized, but in the end the ‘little dude’ is there. thats all i typed in to say lol.
another sacrifice in ancient cultures was to get the man & poke his eyes out befor feeding him alive to a rabid pack of divorced women…
eunuchs were a very high entrusted position of power and were typically the closest relationship to the king other than his family. Back in those days, kings had multiple wives and eunuchs were castrated to ensure they would not fool around with the wives which is why their status was so high.
my grandma has bound feet. they’re tiny. but i never really got to see them because she’d always be wearing those shoes, even when she’s in the house.
Back to MAX (comment #35)
“If you ask a serious doctor(not an american-jew crook)…”
I need some clarification on this subject. What’s the test to determine whether or not my physician is an “american-jew crook?” I actually happen to be quite fond of americans, jewish people and just about anybody else – except for crooks. So I was thinking…should I just propose the question of circumsition, and then I’ll know, based on their answer, wheter or not they’re crooks.
Or…is it just a matter of simple fact that American-Jewish people that happen to be doctors are crooks?
Or…maybe it’s just any doctor that happens to be in any way American and/or Jewish is a crook – like a volatile combination. For example – baking soda and vinegar on their own are quite docile, but put them together and you get quite a fancy 5th grade volcano.
I just HATE getting robbed, so I was hoping for some tips to help protect myself from those vile medical providers always trying to get paid by mutilating my “boy parts” (That’s the term we use in our home when having sensitive discussions with my six-year old son.)
My son, by the way, happens to be circumcised (as well as I am, my father is, and my grandfather before him) as this was a customary religious practice in our family. Unfortunately, I can’t say whether or not this has hurt my *****-life because I have no comparison and there’s probably no going back on the procedure. Personally, however, I think it’s pretty good – foreskin or not.
P.S.
First post for me – thanks for all the lists. I’m completely addicted to top 10 anythings. Is that considered a bizarre tradition?
I’m surprised you guys are not talking about the self mummifying Buddhist monks more because that is the most bizarre of all on this strange list. That’s as hard core as it gets.
I didn’t read all the posts on circumcision or read through all of the ones I did read, but it seems that people are misconstruing male circumcision with castration. Circumcision, at least the kind practiced today, is pretty harmless compared to hacking off the penis. I would say that female circumcision can be compared to male castration rather than male circumcision. I hate the idea of female circumcision.. -shudders-
Anyway, good post! You should have added some “rights of passage” in there, since some of them across the world are extremely bizarre!
Rawrger – I actually just did read through all that (took me a while but so interesting) and no, no one was getting confused; the discussion about male circumcision was always making the distinction between circumcision and castration. No worries.
But yeah, FGM is awful but there is one type that directly corresponds with male circumcision, where they just cut off the clitoral hood but nothing else. I’m pretty sure that is the female equivalent of the average male circumcision, and as far as I know, ***** is still pleasurable for these women.
Not to say that it is an okay practice though. In my opinion, genital cutting of all kinds is bizarre and has virtually no (significant) proven health benefits. So unless it’s being done for religious reasons or because the parents don’t want their child to feel like the odd one out – not a great reason to be circumcised, but understandable – then I feel it should be discouraged, for all the reasons above and more. One other thing that I don’t think was really mentioned is that people say circumcision prevents penile cancer, but less than 1 in 100,000 men get penile cancer every year. And if men with foreskins cleaned properly, the infections would be that much less likely to occur in the first place. And to add a bit of perspective, 1 in 8 women get breast cancer (WAY higher statistic), but you don’t see anyone saying we should cut off amputate all the boobs in America.
Also, as far as a reduced risk of HIV transmission, well, even if that is significantly true, there are FAR better ways of preventing HIV. :p
Apart from SATI covered here, DOWRY is another bizarre tradition from the subcontinent.
DOWRY is NOT a religious practice but a social tradition in South Asia where the father of the bride pays monetary and or liquid/illiquid assets to the bridegroom or his family.
Dowry is banned in India and is punishable offense but is practiced widely. Dowry related bride killings were common till the 1980s/1990s in India and has (hopefully) gone down in the recent past.
Anti-Dowry laws in India are draconian and though still not enforced correctly in most cases, gives women right to walk into a police station and write a complaint against her husband and in-laws. Reason enough for travellers not to bring unhappy wives to India.
It is reported that in the India prison social strata, only rape, murder of minors is considered worse than murder for dowry.
though most of the time women were not allowed to commit seppuku, i have heard that they used a different practice called jigaki, where they would tie their ankles together (to keep from being found in an immodest position) and use a sharp blade to slice the major vessels in each side of the throat.
What a fascinating list!! These practices are all more than jsut a little weird…
Re GEISHAS: Anyone remember the book “Memoirs of a Geisha”? I think it was supposed to be based on fact and if I remember correctly, her virginity was auctioned off to the highest bidder… Isnt that *****?
Re CIRCUMCISION: I had no idea there was such an intense debate about it! Here in Peru most males are circumsized. Well, at least all the boy babies I’ve seen be born, plus I know my brothers are, and my husband… I’ve always heard that it is more hygienic and caused no ill effects so why not… I guess I’ll have to research more carefully and get back to you…
Re FGM: All I can is, I cant believe anyone is even comparing it to circumcision. It is barbaric and has absolutely NO health benefits… Not even the hygiene one!!
I wish someone would tell my husband he is supposed to have a diminished ***** drive and less enjoyment, cos I am tired out after all this boinking.
“Our bodies should be fed to other living creatures. Why not make it a law to be dumped over-board so that we become fish food for our oceans? Or leave our bodies out in the woods to become compost for our trees.”
Well, modern medication makes many people being toxic waste. Especially people who underwent certain chemo therapies etc. So those corpses are to be cremated by law, at least in Germany. And I think it’s similar in other countries, too.
Why not leave the laws as they are and spare the animals from being fed with excessive amounts of hormones (like from the pill), toxic chemicals and whatnot?
Concerning circumcision: Ever heard of soap or water? Wash your genitals, it’s that easy.
The mutilation practice in Africa is not circumcision (then only the clitoral hood would have to be removed) but complete clitoral amputation. Sometimes even in combination with sowing the labia together, leaving only a small opening for urine and menstrual period.
This is just another barbaric practice to “control” the “animalistic *****ual drive” of women.
Well , i think the list should have included the weird custom of wearing large rings around their neck by the women of Paodang tribe of Thailand.
Its the Padaung tribe and i think you will find that they actually originated in Myanmar. They are in Thailand to earn some money from pictures taken with overweight tourists.
To add to that list, you should add male genital mutilation and female genital mutilation, benignly referred to today as male circumcision and female circumcision. Most Americans can agree that female circumcision is absolutely wrong. But most Americans refuse to acknowledge that male circumcision is absolutely wrong because they still commit this mutilation today and don’t want to admit it as a wrongdoing.
There’s nothing bizarre about geishas. It shouldn’t even be on the list. Put on the list male and female circumcision as a bizarre tradition that is still practiced today that should have been extinct a long time ago.
Dueling?! That’s bizarre? I’d replace it with Trepanning. Or O-kee-pa However it’s spelled. Anyway, I liked the bit about the monk.
eeekkk #10 is horrifying
but #1-#9 were all pretty normal in the olden days i guess…
#10 is definitely horrifying
There’s nothing ‘bizarre’ about dueling or seppuku. Both express the want for honor. Why isn’t circumcision mentioned? Now THAT is a bizarre tradition.
I find it highly entertaining that this is the second list I have viewed within the hour that features a lengthy and heavy debate about circumcision!!! Never before have I been so subjected to people’s personal opinions about foreskin!!!
So, after these past things, are we really civilised now!
you apparently dont consider that children might want to look it up its good info but still watch what you put pics of there are students that my local school assigned what i’ve looked up “weird traditions” and i dont believe that some of those photos are appropriate.
i don’t really see how the sky burial is strange. Tons of animals die off in nature and are eaten by vultures- it’s the cycle of life. The Tibetan people simply make the process easier for the hungry birds, and speed up their own grieving time. No dwelling on the past that can no longer be, no grave to obsess over! The body is simply a vessel, afterall.
@jef (110):
Since when was science inappropriate? If your students have ever used the internet before unattended or watched TV, they’ve probably already been exposed to far more disturbing material.
There is, of course, the insane tradition of some Europeans, North and South Americans and others around the globe of either eating and drinking the body and blood of a man dead 2000 years, or atleast to pretend to eat his flesh and blood. These people will consume this man (or at least pretend to) once a week and on special holidays. Animal sacrifice is weird, but cannibalism? vampirism? insane.
@End Circumcision!: The first time I saw an uncircumcised penis, I thanked god I was circumcised. I’m pretty sure I’m not missing out on anything.
@GTT [98]:
This is exactly my thought (I read the book). In addition to the auctioning of the virginity (I believe it was called “mizuage”), the highest accomplishment of the Geisha was apparently to have a (presumably wealthy) “Danna” – in other words, a man who paid her well to be his mistress/”kept woman”. Also, the keepers of the Geisha house (the Okiya, if I remember correctly) would get extremely angry if they found out one of the Geisha had a “boyfriend” – in other words, was having ***** and the Okiya was not being compensated (monetarily) for this “service”. Sounds like high-class ***** to me (Geisha were more “refined”, better dressed, and considered themselves to be above the common street prostitute).
Re: circumcision… I decided not to circumcise my third son after much careful consideration. However, I don’t buy that uncircumcised males have such a rip-roaringly better time *****ually than circumcised males. I’ve read accounts online written by men who either chose for their own personal reasons to be circumcised as adults or had some medical reason for doing so – and they said they liked ***** BETTER as a circumcised male. Not only that, I think circumcised males who think they are “missing out” and have this huge complex about it (and even go so far as to try to “stretch out” a new foreskin using weights or heaven-only-knows what else, or have surgery) – have been brainwashed by intact males who have a superiority complex. I asked my husband if he felt that ***** did not feel satisfying completely, and he looked at me like I was off my rocker. I don’t know from a man’s perspective but I do know that women who experience some variety of *****ual dysfunction (such as women who have never had an orgasm despite years of intimate marriage) just *know* that they are missing out – they feel unfulfilled and know that something is not right. I don’t hear all the millions of circumcised males voicing some vague dissatisfaction with *****.
I think routine circumcision is wrong (I have come to believe that any cosmetic surgery/amputation of a body part should be performed on a child unable to give informed consent unless there is a medical need for the particular procedure), but I don’t buy into all the silly hype about it being so evil and destructive either. I don’t believe the (admittedly slight) risks involved are worth it unless there’s a medical need. When my first two boys were circumcised it was done because the consensus at the time seemed to be that it was a good preventative and hygeienic measure and that the benefits outweighed the risks, but when my youngest was born I’d had enough of seeing the doctors go back and forth (it’s helpful/it’s not helpful) and decided to leave it up to him whether or not he wanted it done, when he was old enough to decide for himself.
The Mesoamerican story of death and rebirth, creation and destruction, appears frequently in pre-Columbian art. When we look at pre-Columbian art and see images that celebrate death, we must keep in mind that death to all Mesoamericans was just a prelude to rebirth–a portal to divine immortality. One of mans first lessons was the concept that in order to live and eat man must kill, whether it be plant life or animal life. Pre-Hispanic codices tell us that the sacrifice of ones own life was believed to be the greatest gift one could give the gods, because it emulated the ways of their creator god Quetzalcoatl, who took his own life when he sacrificed himself at Teotihuacan so as to become the new fifth sun and bring light back to the world: ( Michael Coe 1994 p.91)
Spanish chronicler Fray Diego Duran writes that the word for sacrifice, nextlaoaliztli, in Nahuatl the language of the Aztecs, meant “payment”, or the act of. He writes that young children were being taught that death by the obsidian knife was the most honorable way to die, as honorable as dying in battle or for a mother and child to die in childbirth. Those who were sacrificed by the obsidian knife were assured a place in Omeyocan, the paradise of the sun, the afterlife.
Quoting R. Gordon Wasson….
“The fascination of the Mesoamerican culture for the modern world lies in its strange (for us) traits, in the vast and ever expanding documentation permitting us to explore those traits always making discoveries, in the refinement of its thinking and its high artistic craftsmanship contrasting with human sacrifice and cannibalism on a scale unknown to us elsewhere, and in its chronological and geographical proximity to us….When we look at the mushroom stones we must always remember that in pre-Conquest times most art, if not all, was religious, as it once was in Europe. And we must remember that the hold on the inner life of the Mesoamerican peoples of the ethnogeny, notably the entheogenic mushrooms, was all-powerful, as it is to this day in remote corners of highland Mexico. Those who have not explored the role of the entheogens in the cultural past of Mesoamerica easily overlook that role or assume that it was of minor importance, solely because for us it is of no importance”. (Wasson 1957. 2 vols, p.189; 1980)
(visit mushroomstone.com a research site dedicated to R. Gordon Wasson for more on this fascinating subject)
i strongly feel the list should include THE STILL BEING practiced "BREAST IRONING'" in the West African nation Cameron ! this is most inhumane & horrible treatment ,inflicted by parents to hide the developing breast of young girls ! the practice is officially banned,but sad to say,is still occurring !
—
—
A real bizzare tradition, surrendering oneself to a human master
Hmm… It depends what you're comparing. In severity, the worst of male genital cutting is worse than the mildest of female genital cutting. The death rate, comparing like with like, is probably comparable – nearly 40 males a year 2000-2005 in Eastern Cape Province alone. As human rights violations, they are equivalent. The only reason male cutting is defended is that we do it. To see female cutting defended with equal eloquence, read Indonesian blogs. Both are evil, both should be abolished. Quincy from http://findmanandvan.co.uk