We have all heard about the various methods of execution used around the world in civilized nations, but quite often we don’t know the methods involved in executing the act. With this list I hope to shed some light on the background of an execution, modern style. All but two of these methods of execution are still in use today. [WARNING: This list includes graphic images.]
1. Lethal Injection

Lethal injection room in Huntsville, Texas
In the short time before an execution by lethal injection, the prisoner is prepared for his death. This can include a change of clothing, a last meal, and a shower. The prisoner is taken to the execution chamber and two IV tubes are inserted in to his arms; a saline solution is fed through the tubes. These tubes are then fed through the wall in to an anteroom from where the execution will be carried out. The anteroom contains direct telephone connections to officials who have the power to stay the execution. Once the IV tubes are connected, the curtains are drawn back so that witnesses may watch the execution, and the prisoner is allowed to make his last statement.
Unless a stay is given, the execution begins. There can be one or more executioners, and sometimes in the case of multiple executioners, the lethal dose is given by only one so that no one knows who delivered it. The executioners are shielded from the view of the prisoner and witnesses. The drugs can be delivered by a machine, but due to the fear of mechanical failure, most US states prefer to manually inject the drugs in to the IV. The drugs are then administered in the following order:
Saline solution is used to flush the IV between each dose. Within a minute of two after the final dose is given, a doctor declares the prisoner dead. The body is then sent to the coroner for verification and sometimes an autopsy and is released to the family for burial or is buried by the state.
2. The Electric Chair
The electric chair was invented by Harold P. Brown who was employed by Thomas Edison for the sole purpose of investigating the uses of electricity for execution. Brown, a dentist used to working with people in chairs, used a chair design for his device. At the time there was still competition to see whether Edison’s direct current (DC) or Westinghouse’s alternating current (AC) would win the current war. Edison was in favor of using his opponents AC as he thought it would lead people to believe that AC was more dangerous than DC. In fact, it would make little difference which current were used at the voltage needed for an execution. Edison was so keen to alienate Westinghouse, that he tried to get people to refer to execution by electrocution as “westinghousing” someone. The chair was first adopted in 1889 and the first execution took place in 1890 in New York.
In execution by electric chair, the prisoner is strapped to the chair with metal straps and a wet sponge is placed in his head to aid conductivity. Electrodes are placed on the head and leg to create a closed circuit. Depending on the physical state of the prisoner, two currents of varying level and duration are applied. This is generally 2,000 volts for 15 seconds for the first current to cause unconsciousness and to stop the heart. The second current is usually lowered to 8 amps. The current will normally cause severe damage to internal organs and the body can heat up to 138 °F (59 °C). While unconsciousness should occur within the first second or two, there have been occasions where it has taken much longer, leading people to speak out against this method of execution.
The post-execution cleanup is an unpleasant task as skin can melt to the electrodes and the person often loses control over bodily functions. The skin is also often burnt. The last use of the chair was on the 12th of September in Tennessee (6 days ago as of writing this). You can view a gruesome image of a person after being executed by the electric chair here.
3. Gas Chamber

Gas chamber at Mississippi State Penitentiary
The gas chamber has been used for executions for a considerable number of years. It has gained the most notoriety from its use in the German prison camps during World War II where it was used to exterminate millions of people in one of the worst cases of genocide in the 20th century. All of the five US states that still use the gas chamber allow the prisoner to choose death by lethal injection instead. The last death by gas chamber in the US was in 1999 when German Walter LaGrand was executed in Arizona. There are unconfirmed reports that North Korea is using the gas chamber as a method of execution and to test poisonous gasses on prisoners.
Prior to the execution, the executioner will enter the chamber and place potassium cyanide (KCN) pellets into a small compartment beneath the execution chair. The prisoner is then brought in and secured to the chair. The chamber is sealed and the executioner pours a quantity of concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4) through a tube which leads to a holding compartment in the chair. The curtains are drawn back for witnesses to see the execution and the prisoner is asked to make his last statement. After the last statement, a level is thrown by the executioner and the acid mixes with the cyanide pellets generating lethal hydrogen cyanide (HCN) gas. The prisoners will generally have been told to take deep breaths in order to speed up unconsciousness, but in most cases they hold their breath. Death from hydrogen cyanide is painful and unpleasant.
After the prisoner is dead, the chamber is purged of gas and neutralized with anhydrous ammonia (NH3). Both the ammonia and the acid that must be removed from the chamber are highly dangerous. Guards with oxygen masks then enter the chamber and remove the body so that it can be examined by a doctor.
4. Single Person Shooting

Execution of a Vietcong captian
Execution by shooting is the most common method of execution in the world, used in over 70 countries. Whilst most of these countries use the firing squad, single person shooting is still found. In Soviet Russia, a single bullet to the back of the head was the most frequently used method of execution for military and non-military alike. This is still the main method of execution in Communist China though the gunshot can be to either the neck or head. In the past, the Chinese government would ask the family of the executed person to pay the price of the bullet. In Taiwan, the prisoner is first injected with a strong anesthetic to render him senseless and then a bullet is fired in to his heart.
5. Firing Squad

Antonio Echazarreta executed in 1913 in Mexio
The firing squad is considered by many to be the most honorable method of execution, and for that reason it was specifically not used on war criminals. While the method differs widely from country to country, generally the condemned is blindfolded and restrained. A group of men then fire a single bullet in to the heart of the prisoner. In some cases, one of the shooters is given a blank – so that afterwards he will feel less guilt. None of the shooters knows who has a blank or, in fact, if any of them do. In the most recent execution by firing squad in Utah, the brother of the executed man stated that there were five bullet holes in his brother’s shirt, indicating that every shooter fired a live round. Here is an eyewitness account of the execution of William Johnson, a deserter in the Army of the Potomac in 1861.
All being ready the Marshal waved his handkerchief as the signal, and the firing party discharged the volley. Johnson did not move, remaining in a sitting posture for several seconds after the rifles were discharged. Then he quivered a little, and fell over beside his coffin. He was still alive, however, and the four reserves were called to complete the work. It was found that two of the firing party, Germans, had not discharged their pieces, and they were immediately put in irons. Johnson was shot several times in the heart by the first volley. Each of the four shots fired by the reserves took effect in his head, and he died instantly. One penetrated his chin, another his left cheek, while two entered the brain just above the left eyebrow. He died at precisely a quarter to four o’clock.
In the United States only two states allow execution by firing squad: Idaho, and Oklahoma; though Utah still has four prisoners on death row who were sentenced when it was lawful there and they may be permitted to be executed in this way.
6. Hanging

17 and 18 year old boys hanged in Iran for homosexuality
Hanging is carried out in a variety of ways: the short drop is when the prisoner is made to stand on an object which is then thrust away – leaving them to die by strangulation. This was a common method of hanging used by the Nazis and was the most common form used before the 1850s. Death is slow and painful. Suspension hanging (very popular in Iran) is when the gallows itself is movable. The prisoner stands on the ground with the noose around their neck and the gallows is then lifted in to the air, taking the prisoner with it. The standard drop was in common use in English nations after the 1850s – it involved tying the noose around the prisoner’s neck and then dropping them a short distance (usually 4-6 feet) to break the neck. This was the method used to execute the Nazi war criminals. The final method is the long drop, devised in 1872 in which the weight of a person was taken in to account to determine the correct rope and drop to be used to ensure the breaking of the neck. This was the method used by Albert Pierrepoint, the last executioner of England, described here in more detail:
The night before the execution, Pierrepoint would visit the condemned man in his cell with the Warden. The prisoner was not told that pierrepoint was his executioner. The purpose of the visit was to size the man up. Pierrepoint would use the information he had gained on the visit to decide what thickness of rope and what length of drop to use. He would soak the rope in water and would hang a sandbag the weight of the prisoner at the end to prevent stretching during the execution. The next day pierrepoint would put a cloth over the face of the prisoner and tighten the noose around his neck. He was very careful to ensure that the trapdoor beneath the condemned would be opened as soon after the noose went on as possible and would often kick the level with his foot. The person would then drop through the trapdoor and their neck would break, causing death.
There have been some instances where the long drop method has caused decapitation – the most recent of which was the hanging of Saddam Hussein’s half brother, Barzan Ibrahim al-Tikriti, in Iraq in 2007.
If you can play real audio, here is a BBC interview with Pierrepoint.
7. Beheading

Sentenced at 15, Dhahian Rakan al-Sibai’i, executed July 2007
In some nations that adhere to Islamic Sharia law, beheadings are still a commonly used method of execution. The most frequently seen cases involve beheading by a curved, single-edged sword. While many nations allow beheading by law, Saudi Arabia is the country that uses it most often. The sentence is normally carried out on a Friday night in public outside the main mosque of the city after prayers. The penalty can be dealt for rape, murder, drug related crimes, and apostasy (rejection of religious beliefs).
Saudi Arabia frequently comes under fire from international agencies because of the fact that they continue to pass this sentence on minors. Saudi Arabian officials state that they are not in breach of international law because the sentence is not carried out until the child has reached the age of 18. This was the case with Dhahian Rakan al-Sibai’i (pictured above) who was sentenced at 15 but executed this year at the age of 18.
8. Guillotine

Eugène Weidmann, last public guillotine execution in France, 1939
Contrary to popular belief, Joseph-Ignace Guillotin did not invent the Guillotine; he suggested that a method of execution be devised that was quick and to be used on all people regardless of class. He sat on the committee that eventually designed the device, but it was actually Antoine Louis who came up with the design that was then used to build the first functioning guillotine. This is one of the two execution methods on this list which is no longer used anywhere in the world.
The device itself is a large timber frame with a space at the bottom for the neck of the prisoner. At the top of the machine is a large angled blade. Once the prisoner is secured, the blade is dropped, severing the head and bringing about immediate death. Much speculation exists as to whether or not the person dies immediately, and one man went so far as to ask a prisoner to blink after his head was cut off if he could. The accounts tell us that he did blink, but it is most likely that if he did, it would have been a post-death twitch.
The last public guillotining in France (photo above) was secretly filmed, and the scandalous behavior of the onlookers caused the government to ban public executions. It was the official method of execution in France until the death penalty was outlawed in 1981.
9. Stoning
Stoning to death is when a person’s movements are restricted and an organized group throws stones at them until dead. Under Islamic Sharia law, stoning is an acceptable method of execution and it is used in many Islamic nations. In Iran, stoning is sanctioned for adultery and other crimes. Article 104 of the Law of Hodoud provides that the stones should not be so large that a person dies after being hit with two of them, nor so small as to be defined as pebbles, but must cause severe injury.
“The penalty for adultery under Article 83 of the penal code, called the Law of Hodoud is flogging (100 lashes of the whip) for unmarried male and female offenders. Married offenders may be punished by stoning regardless of their gender, but the method laid down for a man involves his burial up to his waist, and for a woman up to her neck (article 102). The law provides that if a person who is to be stoned manages to escape, he or she will be allowed to go free. Since it is easier for a man to escape, this discrimination literally becomes a matter of life and death.” [Source]
Sentences to death by stoning, or stoning without a sentence have occurred in Afghanistan, Nigeria, Iran, Pakistan, Sudan, Saudi-Arabia and the United Arab Emirates in recent years, according to the International Society of Human Rights. Videos of recent stonings have been smuggled out of Iran. You can watch them here. The most recent stoning in Iran was in 2007 when Jaffar Kiani was stoned to death for adultery.
10. Garrote

1901 execution by garotte in Manila
The garrote is the second method of execution on this list which is no longer sanctioned by law in any country though training in its use is still carried out in the French Foreign Legion. The garrote is a device that strangles a person to death (as in the photograph above). It can also be used to break a person’s neck. The device was used in Spain until it was outlawed in 1978 with the abolition of the death penalty. It normally consisted of a seat in which the prisoner was restrained while the executioner tightened a metal band around his neck until he died. Some versions of the garrote incorporated a metal bolt which pressed in to the spinal chord, breaking the neck. This spiked version is known as the Catalan garrote. The last execution by garrote was José Luis Cerveto in October 1977. Andorra was the last country in the world to outlaw its use, doing so in 1990.
Technorati Tags: crime, death penalty, execution






















Thanks for a interesting site. For your information,
the picture of the stoning is not a real stoning, but
from a anti-stoning protest in Brussels.
http://gfx.dagbladet.no/pub/artikkel/4/47/471/471439/steiningXprotest2.jpg
Would you be more thrilled if it were real? It does quite nicely the way it is, doesn’t it?
I think it’s pretty obvious that it isn’t real. Look at the rocks with “blood” on them. The dirt around the lady would be covered in blood if there were rocks thrown at her that actually picked up some blood.
Hi John,
What do you mean by “be more thrilled?”. Why do you want to know that? I simply informed about the picture. I think it has some relevance on a site on this. You don’t, fine. It doesn’t take a genius to see that it’s not real, but then again Nigeria scammers earn money… I knew right away since I had seen the photo in a newspaper, I didn’t write this to make sure everyone would see that “Lars” is clever. Why can’t we be polite on internet forums instead of being aggressive right away?
Lars
This is disgusting and nasty but every person who has murdered deserves it
Its all horrible and painful even to think about the above mentioned methods of execution especially electric chair, stonning and gas chamber.
Though the guilty should be punished for his crime and to avoid others from doing the same bt at the same time death penality in any form should be abolished.
thanks for the educative article.
The stoning picture creeped me out.
It’s high time that human beings around the world moved on from these barbaric rituals of bloodletting.
I can’t help thinking that a lot of the people who moralise about how wicked convicted murderers are actually get rather a big kick out of the thought or spectacle of judicial execution. In other words, they dress up their own sadism in high-sounding, self-righteous language.
Incidentally, I was puzzled by GingerLee’s remarks above. Perhaps he/she was indulging in irony when remarking that “any government action is guiltless”. Of course it is trivially true that state actions – good, bad and indifferent – are immune from the criminal sanctions of that same state (and usually, although not always, from the sanctions of others). It is still possible to believe, where appropriate, that they are morally wicked. BTW, surely the whole point of Gandhi’s remark (which sits oddly in GingerLee’s post if he/she is NOT being ironic) is that purely retributive punishment ultimately harms the society that practises it.
Hanged for homo*****uality? Horrible, just horrible.
maybe, a life sentence is better than executing, becoz wouldn’t people suffer more if theyhad to live without thier loved ones and also, thier wud no longer be any guilt ridden executioners either
damn if i gotta choose id that the needle
I feel very thankful for these methods and devices after reading Top 10 Serial Killers list. Thank the inventors for there contribution to society.
ALBERT PIERREPOINT WAS NOT ENGLANDS LAST EXECUTIONER AS STATED,HE RESIGNED IN 1956,TWO SIMULTANEOUS EXECUTIONS IN MANCHESTER AND LIVERPOOL TOOK PLACE ON 13TH AUGUST 1964 WHEN CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN THE UK WAS ABOLISHED.THE THICKNESS OF THE ROPE WAS STANDARD AND WAS NOT SOAKED WITH WATER EITHER.THE ONLY PART OF THE EXECUTION WHICH CHANGED BY THE JOB WAS THE LENGTH OF THE DROP.PIERREPOINT WAS NOT INTRODUCED TO THE PRISONERS UNTIL A FEW SECONDS BEFORE THEIR DEATHS EXCEPT WHEN HANGING WAR CRIMINALS IN GERMANY AS HE HAD TO WEIGH THEM,A JOB DONE BY BRITISH PRISON OFFICERS BEFORE HIS ARRIVAL AT THE PRISON.HE IS CREDITED WITH THE FASTEST HANGING ON RECORD,THE PRISONER BEING SUSPENDED ON THE END OF THE ROPE 7 SECONDS AFTER PIERREPOINT ENTERED HIS CELL!
What are sad lot human beings are. I am against all forms of execution, but I do think that murderers etc should be subject to Spartan imprisonment and hard labour and no prospect of release. Surely we are being hypocritical if we kill offenders for their crimes? Mankind should have progressed beyond this barbarism. I am happy to say that Britain and several other European nations will not extradite to any country (including the USA) when the prisoner could face the death penalty. I feel proud that we have reached a higher level of civilisation by our policy on capital punishment.
Yes. Quite a bloody sad lot of nitwick gents we manage to be gov'nuh!
So you are proud of our so called civilised Britain? When hanging was abolished in this country the violent crime rate was around 5 times lower than it is now,prison is not a place of punishment and our laws are a joke.You say that “mankind should have progressed beyond this barbarism”,but what about the rights of innocent victims of murder.Teenagers in particular have no fear of commiting murder as they get a “life sentence” with a tarriff of around 12 years.With time off for good behaviour they will be out after ten.Hanging WAS a deterrent.Very few murders would be commited if the perpetrator ended up at the end of a rope.There is no fear and therefore very little chance of our country ever becoming a safe place to live again.At the time of writing 23 teenagers in London alone have been murdered this year already and you call this civilised.The death penalty may well be barbaric but without it the murder rate has spiralled out of control.How can you possibly justify our society which hands down sentences of 20 years or more for robbery yet passes down almost derogatory sentences for the taking of anothers life,do we value property more?Is this what you laughingly call a higher level of civilisation?
i believe that anyone who has murdered or *****ually penetrated and/or torchured a child should be crippled from the neck down and left on the street to die. if haowever anyone feels that this is punnishment enough, they can always tend to their needs. if also it comes to light that this person is innocent, then they can have the paralysis reversed. this means that the only aproved doctor can perform both procedures assuming they can cause paralysis.if the judge feels that the defendent will somehow get that physician that caused this issue through meens of kidknap or threaten the lives of the surgeon or his/family. then they should be chryogenically frozen, if however after a period of 40 years r so, they have not been pardened or found not guilty. the chryogeenic aplication shall cease. obviously there is a bad patch in the history of crime and unfortunately we’re living in one. but i have faith in future science and believe that these are methods that could be used in the future, hopefully as my children become adults. as i wouldn’t like them to be executed but i also wouldn’t like justice not to happen.
failing all else just carbon manoxide them all. it’s painless, quick and humain!
I think we should throw all violent criminals on an island and take away all their technology and observe them
this artical realy helped me understand some things for a paper I was doing. I have (having no life), read all of the comments, and wish to respond to some commenters. first…
sakul: I beleive you are suffering from extreme paranoia, and obsession of violence. I highly sugest you take a strong dose of ‘get a life’.
zionist power: your name in itself slightly frightens me…
crafty: umm..
nutstomper: really really umm..
Sue: ha
ASimon: I solute you. (*pretty sure I misspelled that..)
mr pop: interesting. what’s the point of having them chryogenically frozen?
ViewARandomList: that would make QUITE a reality show..
chilling…wickedness
i think all of them are a bit harsh
I cant believe anyone would want to pick the electric chair for means of his own execution.
One of my ancestors a MR James Berry was an executioner in the UK from 1852 until 1913. He wrote a book “My Experiences as an Executioner” It makes very interesting reading.
http://www.lulu.com/content/290139
I have a copy of this book but on doing a web search I have found another
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Executioner-Chronicles-James-Victorian-Hangman/dp/0750934085
Possibly have to buy this
Stoning is so cruel…
Thank you! You’re list was very useful for a paper I have to do.
Just a quick note to nutstomper: would nuking really solve the problem? If you nuke them, what’s keeping them from nuking you? There’s a reason atomic bombs are seen as such a threat. WW2 was bad enough. Gandhi said, “You must be the change you wish to see in the world.” Being aggressive won’t solve the violent nature of the world
stoning – modern??? be-heading – modern i think not!
The captions for that picture up there as an illustration for “Single Person shooting” is wrong.
The guy shooting was not a Vietcong captain! He was a South Vietnam Army Captain. The one that he was shooting was, in fact, an alleged Vietcong.
Can’t believe the caption for this is wrong, this picture is so well-known for the South Vietnam’s brutality!
You forgot being forced to listen to modern pop music for extended periods of time- regarded as an extremely cruel and unusual method of death.
I find it hilarious that before a lethal injection, they swab the prisoner’s arm with alcohol. Wouldn’t want him to get an infection, now would we? Haha!
#1 is in the town i live in!
Moshmonster: did you know that when Bush was in charge of
Texas, he sanctioned a law that denied condemned prisoners a last cigarette “on health grounds”
isnt beheading and the guillotine the same thing?
gas chamber is the best way to go down
that would suck
hey jayard do u think that homo*****uals should be hanged
not that im a homo but its not really…
im not homo either its just a qustion
i like ham
true lol
i like banoffe cake (bannana and toffe)
pizzas great
Capital punishment also known as the death penalty is the killings of a person by judicial process for retribution .crimes that result in capital punishment are called capital crimes or capital offences.
People need to stop making lists with number one at top. YOU RUIN THE SURPRISE AND ALLURE OF THE LIST. YOU PUT NUMBER ONE AT THE BOTTOM JESUS CHRIST
RAGE QUIT
J.Its the first time i have ever heard of GAROTE as a punishment.All i know is that when they say garote my father will hit my ass with a garote when i come hole late.
thank you for the info and very vintage pic.
aj
Ps . Sakul.Please tell me where you are and i will deliver the missiles or granade launcher on your doorsteps free of charge : ) lol
hi im on the internet wwwwwwwoooooooooooooooooooooooo
Clearly execution is a provocative issue that drives out passion even in the divisive comments. At its core, state execution remains as the taking of life; on behalf of the people represented by the respective state.
It’s relatively easy to self-justify an execution when immersed in outrage over a heinous crime. The same principle is often used as an explanation for “why I did it” by people whom we process as criminals.
Still, society must be protected and victims are entitled to justice. An approach that has the potential to satisfy both of these objectives would involve incarceration along with intense psychotherapy.
The therapy would have the sole purpose of raising the consciousness of the perpetrator so that a true awareness of the right and wrong of the crime and, a realization of the painful impact of its consequences on the innocents. There’s a multitude of “medications” available that could be help to instill ownership and responsibility of the crime in the least amount of time.
We’d turn the criminal into a peaceful, understanding person with no tolerance for injustice and then, let his own guilt-ridden psyche deliver a personalized lifetime of hell on earth.
Perhaps after a pre-determined amount of time, the tools of a suicide could be made available…not an easy way out but a method that would require much deliberation and be reflective of the original crime.
glh
This is awful. I’m 15, I figured it would be OK to see the modern executions, but my god, this is awful, it’s disturbing, why not just put them in jail for the rest of their life rather than killing? That’s wicked. The only execution I found was ‘peaceful’ is the Injection. They should banned every other execution and allow just the Injection.
I wonder if their crimes are that bad to be killed in such a horrible and terrifying way. And how in the *****ing earth can the ‘viewers’ see them dieing? Omg.
I know this is some serious schadenfreude, but I find it hilarious that a prisoner sentenced to die by lethal injection is given an alcohol swabbing on the arm before the needles are placed. We wouldn’t want them to die AND
@moshmonster (104): Dangit, posted before I was ready. I meant to say, we wouldn’t want them to die AND get an infection, now would we?
They need to bring back Drawn and Quartering.
Jesus that’s *****ing disgusting…
I think they should outlaw all methods of executions. This list made me really, really upset.
State executions are okay – always okay… I say so only ONLY On the grounds that the executioners are alSO put to death immediately after taking da lives of death row criminals!! This makesz the act of punishment … Coz.. whenever there is guilt and blocddshed There IS murder… The state may or may not pardon the executioners.. Spared fine.. another execution job; else too bad. Someon1 else gets his hands “dirtied” by blood. It should never be a high-paying profession no matter how noble it seems to be.. It is dirty cruel, act against humanity.. Next to abortion and murder. !!!
It’s easy to look down on all these methods because it is easy to forget that these people being executed are criminals NOT victims.
Most people that do get the death penalty is often for the offense of killing another person themselves too.
A cousin of mine was murdered and saw in court the murderer get a slap-on the wrist simply because he was a UNI student in his last year with no previous criminal record (Canada – very soft). He only got time-already-served (4 months).
Putting that mothfu*ker in the ground to be stoned would have been a joyous occasion. I know it sounds harsh, but you really don’t understand the desire for retribution until someone has committed a horrible act against your own loved one.
Believe me, I used to be all-against the death penalty until my own relative was murdered. I think the Canadian system is incredibly soft for serious crime.
You can get more jail-time for fraud & theft (a colleague got 6 years in prison for stealing from his employer) than you can get for murder here. It shows you where this country’s priorities are.
If anything. I think the death penalty system should be designed in such a way that the murderer die exactly or similarly to the same way he killed his victim.
If he stabbed someone, stab him back. If he strangled someone, strangle him. If he poisoned someone, etc you get the point.
I think that would be the most fair way and teach the murderer something about perspective when he sits on death row.
*****ing Muslims
*****ing VPayne.
it’s really interesting but executing a person is murder. so the executioners must be executed after the execution. and the executioners of the executioners must be executed too. …………………..
(P.S. i’m just a kid.)
theydeserveit you got the right idea but the problem with your idea is that the way that most serial killers are sick bastards and kill people in the most disgusting way possible. The only way any sane person could do eye for an eye would have to be one of the victims (if they survived) or one of the victims family members. The Hy-Fi killers made there victims drink drano and then pushed a pen into one of there skulls because he was taking to long to die. When you can find someone who can do that to another person that is sane then your idea would work but these guys were sick bastards and there is no way anyone in there right mind would do this kind of thing to anyone else. If you don’t believe me here is the link. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hi-Fi_Murders
Alright, what 114 said makes sense to an extent, as with 115. At one tome I believed in CP, then I realized it was simply taking a life for another,and sometimes for a non-murder related crime. The requirements for the death penalty should be a little more strict, in my opinion. Oh yeah, my opinion changed again a while back, so I now support CP, partly because the highest of sins is stated as the taking of INNOCENT life, making just execution somewhat neutral.
One more thing, the garrote was used in one of the 007 films, but I can’t remember which one.
This is a pattern I noticed: Third World Nations tend to resort to executions more than richer nations because it costs their governments money to house and feed an inmate. The poorer the government, the more executions.
I have no problem executing a murderer or a rapist. Sign me up if you need volunteers.