The Beatles are one of the most commercially successful and critically acclaimed bands in the history of popular music. They are a cultural icon, and an inspiration to thousands of musicians who followed in their footsteps. This is a list of their 15 greatest songs.
15. Nowhere Man
This is a timeless classic that can still bring a chill to anyone. There is something about the harmonies on this song that was missing from most of the other British bands of the period. As great as the Rolling Stones were, they would never be able to honestly match the songwriting skill of Lennon and McCartney. When you combine that with the booth work of George Martin, musical magic happens.
14. With A Little Help From My Friends
This is a very strange song for The Beatles. It has a fine basic melody but a very boring chorus. Ringo’s vocals sheer bread and butter while the other band members go into stylish high notes on the backing track. It’s Ringo’s heartful vocal performance that make this big (yes, he can actually sing). And don’t forget to listen to his brilliant drum breaks too.
13. Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds
It is said that this was written because John’s son drew a picture of a cartoon named Lucy. I guess we’ll never really know, but the results of this song were outstanding. Many think that Lucy is a bit too strange even for The Beatles (right…listen to Revolution 9) but I enjoy every little weird thing about it.
12. We Can Work It Out
It’s easy to forget amid the shower of psychedelia that what The Beatles really did best were perfect, three minute pop songs. We Can Work It Out is short but sweet, but it’s compositionally exceptional too. That time change for “fussing and fighting,” that transforms the song into a brief waltz is an unexpected and sophisticated switch that alters the entire context of the tune.
11. Norwegian Wood (This Bird Has Flown)
This was George’s first use of the sitar and Ravi Shankar cringed in jealousy. The sitar doubling the guitar works great with the song and the riff is very memorable. John wrote this one about an affair he had with a very peculiar woman, and he provides some great vocal work. In the end, Norwegian Wood is just a cool laid-back tune with amazing lyrics; it’s great poetry set to great music.
10. Day Tripper
Otis Redding inspired song; this one’s about sex and drugs, simple as that. The Beatles were producing great riffs at this time and this was certainly one of them. Unfortunately, this song is marred by dropouts in two places to cover up vocal errors. Still, the vocals in the chorus are fantastic (in my opinion, one of the best by Lennon).
9. Come Together
The Beatles do swamp music, and it turns out great. Yet I just don’t know why I love this. The lyrics are total nonsense and composition isn’t so great either, but it’s just so damn good. Perhaps it’s just the intro. I mean how did they do that weird ch-ch-ch noise? The song also features some great drum beats by Ringo, and a nice guitar solo by George.
8. Hey Jude
Yes, it has been a little overplayed, but there is a reason for that. The song, supposedly written as a ‘keep your chin up’ song for Julian Lennon after the break-up of his parents, contains some of McCartney’s best lyrics. The line “The movement you need is on your shoulder” was almost removed when McCartney thought people might think he was talking about a parrot, but Lennon insisted the lyrics be left in. Lennon felt it was one of the best songs Paul ever wrote and I thoroughly agree.
7. Revolution 1
Whether they’re rocking it or doo-wopping it, Lennon’s message is always crystal clear – anything for change except violence. It was during this period that Lennon was undergoing a revolution of his own. He was discovering that he enjoyed jamming with others outside the Beatles. This was the inevitable beginning of the end. Brian Epstein was dead and so were, in John’s mind, the Beatles. In less than two years, his thoughts would prove to be true.
6. Baby You’re A Rich Man
From the rumbling, accelerating-decelerating bassline upwards through Lennon’s falsetto questioning in the verses. “Baby You’re a Rich Man” isn’t The Beatles’ most renowned, popular, fun, or unusual song, but I love it. The arrangement features an array of instruments but still maintains a slight simplicity, reliant on the bass guitar and occasional abnormal stabbing hooks.
5. Eleanor Rigby
Beautifully written, beautifully sung, and especially beautiful instrumentals. This is one of those songs that just grew on me the more I heard. I originally was not a big fan of this particular song, but it has now become a favorite after listening to it more and realizing just how interesting this song really is. It was such a different feel for The Beatles, but in my opinion, it came out great.
4. Happiness Is A Warm Gun
This is probably the most analyzed Beatles song of all time. Deciphering the meaning can be a bit tough since there are so many different opinions about what it is that John is really talking about. Sometimes the tempo changes too quickly and there are minor flaws throughout the song, but this is a great tune besides those little things. But no one cares about those things anyway. It’s a great song, and that’s all you need to know. From the nonsensical lyrics about lizards and hobnail boots to the somber guitar solo, this is one of the most solid Beatles songs.
3. Strawberry Fields Forever
Another song that is a bit experimental but the end results are amazing. George Martin’s arrangement is full of brilliant effects. The vocal distortion and sad lyrics are great, but I also really like George’s little guitar bits here and there. This is another depressing yet uplifting song that never gets old.
2. A Day In The Life
There is so much accomplished in just this one little song (instrumentals, lyrics, vocals) that it still amazes me every time I listen to. The way John starts out slowly and Paul falls in (moving into a more upbeat rhythm), and both bringing their own lyrics from previous songs to combine it into this one song makes this piece just outstanding. A strange fact though: in the end there’s a super high note which only dogs can hear.
1. Let It Be
What a great hymn! This is such an absolutely perfect rock ballad. Touchy melody, fine chorus, somehow roughly sophisticated arrangement, and slightly weird and religious lyrics about “Mother Mary”. Is she Mother Mary Magdalene from The Bible or Paul’s mother (whose name is Mary too)? This is such a great song that even today, over 30 years after it was released; it can still lift anyone’s spirits. A great song with a great message: just let it be!
Contributor: dazednconfused




















at the risk of being flamed, I just could never get into the beatles. I think their stuffs ok, but nothing too special. Just my thought.
Now Zeppelin, thats a different story
if you like Led Zeppln then why are you here?
Screw the Beatles, the Rolling Stones were/are superior in every way!
yeah… you're alone on this one mister…
Wow. How silly…
I’m referring to ‘torn and frayed’ by the way.
not to mention that the first Rolling Stones hit is the Beatles song dumbass
Uh, dude, yer gonna have to start with ‘Yesterday’ and go from there methinks. . . .
Not enough George.
..Wait.
There’s NO George!!!
Gah! *picks up hammer and hunts down contributor*
Exactly–looks like a Lennon fan to me.
Blackbird!! Come on people!
My favorite at the moment is While My Guitar Gently Weeps.
I WANNA HOLD YOUR HAND!!!
JOE ROSSON: shouldn’t we get to know each other better first?
A list like this comes down to just personal preference—there’s no way to argue with it or contradict it, because everyone who loves the Beatles makes of them what they will. There’s not a single Beatles song I actually “dislike,” merely those that are “less favorite” than others. I imagine that’s the way for most people who really listen to the Beatles and get them.
I remember—one of my oldest memories probabably—my sister’s copy of “Rubber Soul” on a table somewhere in our house (this would have been in 1967 maybe, when I was two years old… though maybe it was later… I’m not sure that my memories really could go back that far, to such a young age) and the record playing on our big console stereo (a huge piece of furniture in the living room–anyone born later than the 60s will probably have no idea what I mean). I remember staring at that slightly distorted, fisheye cover photo of the Beatles, hearing the music (so otherworldly, strangely enticing) and was from that moment intrigued. I’ve been a Beatles fan ever since, I think.
I would have put “Got to Get You Into My Life” on this list… and “The Night Before,” “Ticket to Ride,” “I Feel Fine”…. but then, again… it doesn’t matter. The Beatles are the Beatles.
To “not get into them” (or prefer Led Zeppelin over them) is silly, and to me speaks of a mind not open to the glorious, beautiful, joyous things in life. So I suggest (seriously) that you grow up, “evan.” Not a flame, just an honest observation–it’s like saying you prefer a bag of Cheetos over a decent, good, hearty meal.
Too much to choose from, i’m afraid and too many left out..there should have been at least 10 more to this list..
She’s Leaving Home
Here comes the sun
Something
I’ll get you
Girl
Michelle
Piggies
Fixing a Hole
Ticket to Ride
I Need You
Evan, consider yourself flamed
Why doesn’t anybody ever consider any of the early stuff, i.e. pre-Rubber Soul? Here’s some great early ones…
“A Hard Day’s Night”, for that opening chord alone, ought to be on the list.
“No Reply”, a fantastic melody
“Ticket To Ride” and “Help”, both from the “Help” film and album
“I’m Down” – rock out with your… well, y’know.
“I Saw Her Standing There” – ditto.
And some great vocals, harmonies and otherwise, on “This Boy”, “It Won’t Be Long” and “Twist And Shout”.
The stuff that gets played on Classic Rock stations is all well and good (“Hey Jude” is my fav song, btw) but overlooking the early stuff leaves out a lot of fantastic music. And it’s the foundation of songs that came later, anyway. A mistake, IMHO, to let it go by unremarked.
I’m starting to think this site writes lists that intentionally leaves things out, making an impossible list, and creating an environment where it’s impossible for me to get any work done.
Suggestions for future controversy: Best college football program, Hottest female actress, Tastiest candy bar, Best beer, Funniest commedian, Most honest politician (short list), or Best TV show.
No George and no Yesterday isn’t a Best Beatles song list, it’s a do-over. Cmon people, wake up!
happiness is a warm gun, lucy in the sky with diamonds, and strawberry fields forever have to be my favorites. i’m much more of a fan of their “edgier” stuff rather than the pop.
no “yesterday” or “across the universe”??
I found a strange version of “A Day in The Life” that has a part after the end of the version you posted where it sounds like they’re saying “never could be any other way” over and over again
While my guitar gently weeps and Yesterday should be there. And every other song they have, oh well.
bucslim: hey – at least you can add humor to your complaints
Thanks for that! Oh – and in about 30 minutes I will be posting a list that I think you will just love
Jamie you are a god!
My favourite Beatles song (and maybe favourite song of all time) is Maxwell’s Silver Hammer. For the longest time, I was obsessed with that song and would sing it everday. I even made a cartoon flipbook to go along with the song. I wrote the lyrics on my bedroom wall on indelible marker and would even talk to my friends using quotes from that song.
I’m much better now though.
j – I’m your most humble list commenting *****. Bring it on.
“I Saw Her Standing There” is one of the greatest rock and roll songs that were ever written. It’s timeless. I remember (again with the memories) being in college, early 80s–and out at a dance club one weekend. Of course all the usual stuff was played, some crap, some good… we were all sweaty from dancing, a group of us, and had retired to the perimeter of the dance floor to cool off, have a beer… then for some reason, in the midst of one New Wave dance single after another, the DJ suddenly spun “I Saw Her Standing There.” This cute little blonde that I’d never seen before came up to me and asked me to dance, and out we went, swinging around wildly to the Beatles. One of my most favorite memories of my youth.
“Yesterday” is one my least favorite Beatles songs, though… don’t know how people can still sit through it, after all these years. Pretty melody, I suppose… but it’s the one Beatles song that I think really did get “overplayed” in successive years… and I never really did admire the lyrics, either. John Lennon voiced his dislike for the song in the famous interview with Playboy just before he was murdered… and I have to agree with him about it.
Sweet Story -.-…Yesterday is a great song. could care less if its overplayed or underplayed! Paul’s lyrics are always legit
No Penny Lane? Aww….OR Hello Goodbye? I LOVE that one! And where would my life be without Twist and Shout?!
I was fine with this list, even though it’s not what I would have picked. But…
WHY NO TOMORROW NEVER KNOWS?!?!?!?
Randall:
“To “not get into them” (or prefer Led Zeppelin over them) is silly, and to me speaks of a mind not open to the glorious, beautiful, joyous things in life. So I suggest (seriously) that you grow up, “evan.” Not a flame, just an honest observation–it’s like saying you prefer a bag of Cheetos over a decent, good, hearty meal.”
While I love the Beatles, I don’t think you can criticize someone for not having an open mind because they don’t also like them. And also, there is a strong argument to be made that other bands, such as Led Zeppelin in this case, are superior to the Beatles. You don’t have to buy into it, but keep an open mind to it.
Are you all CRAZY!?
I am the walrus.
Randall: Hey, hey, hey. Hey. I will take any Led Zeppelin song over ANY Beatles song any day, and I listen to them both a lot. Watch your step. Isn’t there any music that you never really got into? Don’t hate on someone just becuase they never found the Beatles music appealing. Also, you are being QUITE closed minded yourself in calling Led Zeppelin lacking in exposing oneself to the joys of beautiful music. >=(
RANDALL….
WTF are you talking about??? Because i dont care for the Beatles im suddenly silly, and of a mind not open to the glorious, beautiful, joyous things in life. That i seriosly need to grow up???
Wow, you obviously are the closed mind immature one from somehow coming to that conclusion and making an irrational ignorant broad brush statement like that, simply because im not a big beatles fan.
BOO. U SUCkk
for some reason i cannot edit my post, replace wearshades with Randall, my bad wearshades…
PAPERBACK WRITER…
HELP…
At least Elanor Rigby was there! That song means so much more when you stand at the grave of Elanor Rigby and see that Father Mcenzie is buried alongside…
Great list though, even without the aformentioned classics!
WearShades & Kelsi:
Led Zeppelin = Jock Rock. Occasionally engaging, hard-rocking… but Jock Rock nevertheless. I don’t care if you like them, I don’t care if they’re your favorite band. By all means, go ahead and love them. There’s no accounting for taste. The vulgar masses reveal themselves by their lack thereof.
But to dismiss the Beatles as inferior to Led Zeppelin is laughable. It shows a total lack of understanding of history, an inability to grasp historical and artistic context, and a poor set of ears.
Given the choice of listening to… oh, say, a violin concerto of Mozart’s or, oh… say, The Shins… I will probably pick the Shins in most instances. That doesn’t mean I think the Shins are greater than Mozart, of course. I acknowledge Mozart’s greatness, and do, in fact, occasionally prefer to listen to him—when the mood strikes me or when I’m looking to put myself *into* a particular mood.
I would never, however, dismiss Mozart as “inferior” to some modern pop group. That would be just plain silly.
Dismissing the Beatles is equally silly.
I guess Jamie should update his list on “Ways to seem smarter than you are” with – Bashing Led Zeppelin.
Hello all! Just wanted to make everyone jealous by mentioning that I will be seeing Led Zeppelin live next month in London. Cheers! or something like that
Led Zeppelin = Jock rock? I think it’s you who has no understanding of history, an inability to grasp historical and artistic context and a poor set of ears.
evan: done.
Ah elitists. I’ve noticed with people who think they are extremely smart is that they are well above the peons all around them. They think that their one brain is actually more powerful than all the other brains around them combined. Randall falls into this trap completely and shows their failings. Here’s a perfect example of an elites who thinks he is somehow superior to you and everyone else, his views and opinions somehow become fact, and all those who disagree with him are now “silly, and of a mind not open to the glorious, beautiful, joyous things in life, that seriously need to grow up”. Very interesting indeed, that speaks volumes on Randall.
evan:
Calm yourself. Go sit down by the window. Look out at the trees and listen to the birds for a while. It’ll be all right.
I remind you, evan… you expected to be “flamed” and practically invited it. So come on now. Thin skins aren’t becoming this season.
Now… I do not demand that everyone need be “big Beatles fans.” I will, however, speak out against the kind of lumpen, low-brow taste of the sort I’ve encountered oh so many times in my long life (I’m probably a lot older than you—I was born the year after the Beatles first appeared on Ed Sullivan) that evinces itself by statements such as “Led Zeppelin is superior to the Beatles.” (You didn’t say that, of course, but I gather you’d agree with the sentiment). I’ve been called “immature” by such people just now in this thread–surely a case of the pot calling the kettle black–and “closeminded.” Ha. I won’t even dignify such silly accusations with comment.
In point of fact in my youth I had all of Led Zeppelin’s albums, as well as all of the Stones and all of the Beatles, the Who, the Kinks, etc. etc. etc. My taste for one sound/group would wax and wane, ebb and flow… but I was (frankly) open-minded enough and wise enough to realize that all that I knew and listened to–even the Rolling Stones–that issued post-Beatles existed *because* of the Beatles. Do I stand behind every drekky sentimental mush-song that Paul McCartney ever coughed up? Of course not. If offered a choice between “Maxwell’s Silver Hammer” (sorry JT) or “Obla Di Obla Da” and “Black Dog” or “Good Times Bad Times”… well, actually I’d probably switch the stereo off… but if forced to choose *in that particular instance*, I’d probably rather listen to the Zep songs over “Maxwell” and “Obla Di”. But that doesn’t mean I dimiss the Beatles or consider Zep to be superior.
The fact is that Heavy Metal appeals to an arrested adolescent mindset, the kind that I rejected when I was about 17 years old (because I wasn’t an arrested adolescent, but rather grew out of it). I don’t particularly care if you agree or disagree; experience showed me long ago that I’m right.
1. The Beatles kick major ass.
2. Led Zepplin also kicks ass, but in a totally different way.
3. Led Zepplin is hardly “jock rock.” I don’t think anyone could consider the majestic Jimmy Page a “jock.”
4. Random fact: I have Jimmy Page’s symbol tattooed on my forearm (yeah, I’m a dork) but I sure as hell am not a jock!
5. Why the hell are there no George Harrison songs on this list?!
I’m done now. Off to class :p
Monkey:
Led Zeppelin is “jock rock” because it’s a major favorite OF jocks… of course Jimmy Page was not a jock himself.
Funny how these threads are never about the topic at hand. Someone presents a list of favorite Beatles tunes, and a bunch of Zeppelin-lovers feel they have to chime in and get their digs in. Sad, really, these insecure types…
“experience showed me long ago that I’m right.” Thanks for proving my point.
Another entire post of why you’re “right” and everyone else is wrong, despite you making the earlier statement of “A list like this comes down to just personal preference—there’s no way to argue with it or contradict it…” apparently this only people who agree with you and Beatles tracks, you don’t hold such a “open mind” on that same subjectivenes on bands as a whole.
You say ” I won’t even dignify such silly accusations with comment” but you did and im sure you will continue to do so…
“They think that their one brain is actually more powerful than all the other brains around them combined”…
evan, are you trying to tell me that there are more people in this world who think that Led Zeppelin are superior to the Beatles than vice versa? Where are you getting the stuff you’re smoking?
On the other hand, the NUMBER of people who believe something is no proof of its truth, pal.
evan, I’ve hurt your feelings… I see this now. So sorry. Go back and put your headphones on, and tune out reality. I’m an elitist (ah, guilty, so guilty) and Led Zeppelin–a group which I guarantee you will be utterly forgotten in a hundred years–is superior to the Beatles–who were acknowledged for the force in music that they were from the get-go. Yes yes, evan… there there. The sky is the color you choose it to be.
Randall:
Do you think because you are older you have some divine right to critical supremacy? From what I’ve read you are simply a petty snob who would rather base their opinion on whatever p-fork would write rather than based on your own listens. Led Zeppelin is quite simply not jock rock. That notion is absurd, as is your assumption that the Beatles are intrinsically superior because they are the Beatles. They are great, and most of the people you are now arguing with agree with you on that, but Led Zeppelin have made a strong case for being the superior artist. I’m not telling you what to believe, but I am telling you that you’re wrong in your methodology. Age/assumptions about an audience don’t make an argument. You need evidence, for which you have none. You can say whatever you want about your opinion, but you should stop making factual claims when they are not backed up by anything empirical.
That statement has nothing to do with the Beatles but rather your mindset, that your views and opinions are somehow greater than anyone else’s. Which is all to apparent in your posts.
You immature level is once again showed with comments such as “? Where are you getting the stuff you’re smoking? “. Way to go, with each post you are making yourself look more and more like the elitists snobs I’ve described.
I couldn’t even imagine trying to rank my top fifteen Beatles songs…way too hard. Just for fun though, some of favorites that I haven’t seen mentioned are “Don’t Let Me Down,” “I Feel Fine,” and “Rocky Racoon.”
Jfrater: Why is the contributor name at the bottom of the list? Is it possible to change this so that it’s the first thing we see?
Randall:
“Led Zeppelin–a group which I guarantee you will be utterly forgotten in a hundred years”
Ah yes, another unsubstantiated claim. Well lets look at some numbers shall we?
From the RIAA: 4. LED ZEPPELIN – 109.5 (certified units in millions)
So they are the fourth biggest selling artist in US history, but they’ll be forgotten in 100 years?
lol in reference to post 40, hahaha no you’re just being pathetic, thanks for the laugh..
wearshades, its laughable I know, but because he believes it to be true, it must be right? Doesn’t he know better than all else?
He’s one of those people who try to force terrible arguments onto people, and when he is proven wrong (as he has here) he comes up with even more ridiculous claims. I have no problem with his tastes, it’s his opinion, but he just doesn’t realize that his claims are off and his argument style is weak.
I usually don’t criticize “personal opinion” lists, but I’m more than a little surprised you put ‘With a Little Help From My Friends’ on list, not because of what I think (it’s mediocre), but based on what you yourself said about it. But while we’re on the subject, ‘Baby You’re a Rich Man’ is laaaame.
Led Zep VS. The Beatles aside (they’re both worthy pursuits), The Beatles music transcends measurement. You could release, say, Abbey Road today for the first time and it would still absolutely floor critics and consumers alike. The songs and the album as a whole would be considered revolutionary, fresh and timeless.
You may remeber rockin’ out to a particular Zeppelin tune at some point and have great memories associated with it, but mostly the music just inspires a certain mood. However, many people I know mark the passage of their lives with Beatles songs. By that I mean there’s a Beatles song that seems to perfectly suit one of their children and another for their wedding day and another that reminds them of their mum; as though the particular songs were written with that person or moment in mind. To hear such songs transports you instantly to that place/time/person as powerfully as if you had a time machine. I can’t think of another modern band with the ability to do that song after song, album after album.
Can’t we all just get along?
Your avatar goes great with that statement. haha
Excellent list! I would probably have Let It Be at the top too.
The Beatles are both objectively brilliant, and capable of touching their fans individually.
Also: Mother Mary and Mary Magdalene were two different Maries in the Bible.
Plural of Mary is Maries? …Not Mary’s …ok…
a list with too many songs
should have been a top 2
eleanor rigby simply for the strings
and while my guitar gently weeps
those are the only two good songs from the most overrated group in music history
bob dylan and the rolling stones are much better and from the same period, more relevant deeper songs
bon jovi even wrote better songs then these drugged-out egotistical losers
I dont have a problem with anyone liking the Beatles more, or having their opinion as them as being a better band. I believe it far too subjective for anyone to say in a complete matter of fact way, anyone band is better than any other. It’s a matter of tastes, beauty is in the eye, or in this case ear, of the beholder. It’s people like Randall he have the attitude of I’m wrong, you’re wrong, if you disagree your’re a moron, wah wah wah…” that make rational discussions impossible.
ugh, aweful spelling there. not being able to edit my posts is starting to get on my nerve jfrater, fix it
just kidding, im sure it’s caused by something on my end, damn company IT filters.
Put away delusions of grandeur, randall, and make up your mind on what you are even arguing about. First, it’s “Led Zeppelin is only for dumb jocks and adolescents.” Then when called on that, your response is “the Beatles are better”.
Maybe it’s your browser, evan? I’m using firefox and have no problems.
evan/wearshades:
In criticism, one doesn’t offer “proof.” Criticism isn’t a science. One offers opinions. I see no one offering “proof” for their opinion that Zep is superior to the Beatles, so your insistence that I offer “proof” for my opinions is disingenous (at best).
BTW… Numbers of record sales prove nothing, “wearshades,” in regards to quality. Popularity does NOT equal value.
I would ask both of *you* why you felt it necessary to pipe in with your opinions about LED ZEPPELIN on a thread that was totally devoted to THE BEATLES. Think about that one.
“thatguy” puts it succinctly. The Beatles are transcendant. “People mark the passage of their lives with Beatles songs” is an eloquent and elegant way of stating it. Zeppelin, on the other hand, is the fascination of males who are stuck in their teenage years. You don’t wanna buy that, I don’t care; I have better things to waste my time on. I frankly defy you to find a single MAJOR and IMPORTANT rock critic—any—who would support your statements that “Zeppelin has made a strong case to being the superior artist.” But then critics are all elitists, aren’t they?
As to my argument style, evan, come off it. Again I remind you, in your original post you practically invited flaming. Get off your high horse about it.
oh man, this is absurd. I never said that one band was better/superior to any other. I stated I liked Zeppelin. You not only said because of that, that I was “silly, and of a mind not open to the glorious, beautiful, joyous things in life. That I seriously need to grow up” and that I must be “smoking something”.
Please, please, please, point out to me where I’ve stated Zeppelin is a better band than the Beatles???? YOU CAN’T. I’ve never made such a comparison.
You again make a statement such as “I have better things to waste my time on” but apparently you don’t as you keep posting.
You’re an elitist snob who makes arrogant ignorant statements, I couldn’t care less which band you feel is the best.
So please, i believe it’s you who needs to get down off a high horse. I’m down here walking with the common peons.
Sweet Marie! I took a Rock And Roll History class in college with fewer mud-slinging moments than in here! You have to know, opening up with a “Top Anything” List by the Beatles is just asking for trouble. I’m not even going to bother with including a favorite since the responses alone run the gamut. Fun to read, though!
“BTW… Numbers of record sales prove nothing, “wearshades,” in regards to quality. Popularity does NOT equal value.”
No it doesn’t, but once again you’ve stumbled over your own words. This wasn’t to show they were better, but to show they wouldn’t be forgotten in 100 years as you so foolishly said.
“I would ask both of *you* why you felt it necessary to pipe in with your opinions about LED ZEPPELIN on a thread that was totally devoted to THE BEATLES. Think about that one.”
I for one didn’t bring up Zeppelin, I just responded to your comments about them.
“As to my argument style, evan, come off it. Again I remind you, in your original post you practically invited flaming. Get off your high horse about it.”
But if he does that you two won’t be on an even playing field.