<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 15 Beatles Songs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://listverse.com/2007/11/06/top-15-beatles-songs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://listverse.com/2007/11/06/top-15-beatles-songs/</link>
	<description>Ultimate Top 10 Lists - Listverse</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roo</title>
		<link>http://listverse.com/2007/11/06/top-15-beatles-songs/#comment-227480</link>
		<dc:creator>Roo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://listverse.com/music/top-15-beatles-songs/#comment-227480</guid>
		<description>Beatles = cous cous
Led Zeppelin = Green Peppers
Rolling Stones = Caramelised onion.

Jonas Brothers = 3 day old turd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beatles = cous cous<br />
Led Zeppelin = Green Peppers<br />
Rolling Stones = Caramelised onion.</p>
<p>Jonas Brothers = 3 day old turd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natapillar</title>
		<link>http://listverse.com/2007/11/06/top-15-beatles-songs/#comment-219483</link>
		<dc:creator>natapillar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://listverse.com/music/top-15-beatles-songs/#comment-219483</guid>
		<description>excellent list! i dont think there is one Beatles song i dislike.
my faves are Lucy In The Sky, Strawberry Fields and All You Need Is Love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent list! i dont think there is one Beatles song i dislike.<br />
my faves are Lucy In The Sky, Strawberry Fields and All You Need Is Love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Audrey</title>
		<link>http://listverse.com/2007/11/06/top-15-beatles-songs/#comment-218567</link>
		<dc:creator>Audrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://listverse.com/music/top-15-beatles-songs/#comment-218567</guid>
		<description>[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUXVH7qL8aw&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;]

&#039;Nuff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://listverse.com/2007/11/06/top-15-beatles-songs/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/XUXVH7qL8aw/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
<p>&#8216;Nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonny</title>
		<link>http://listverse.com/2007/11/06/top-15-beatles-songs/#comment-210310</link>
		<dc:creator>jonny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://listverse.com/music/top-15-beatles-songs/#comment-210310</guid>
		<description>Madness this riles people so much,
Music&#039;s not a football team that fans must argue about and defend, its all personal opinions. I&#039;d list my view of whos better but i feel little need to, as it would fall on def ears and rightly so, who cares what band i thinks better, if we were all the same and liked the same things life would be a right bore. Anywho think mayb more peace and if posts are to be made they should stick to the point of the article..... what are the best beatles songs. 
There is so many, havn&#039;t seen Mother Natures Sun, Cry Baby Cry or For No One!? Ace songs!!
Martha My Dear Deserves a shout, think this was one of their finest, uplifting engligh song.
Amazing though 40+ years later their music still touches so many people, think that alone says it all
Much Love.xx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Madness this riles people so much,<br />
Music&#8217;s not a football team that fans must argue about and defend, its all personal opinions. I&#8217;d list my view of whos better but i feel little need to, as it would fall on def ears and rightly so, who cares what band i thinks better, if we were all the same and liked the same things life would be a right bore. Anywho think mayb more peace and if posts are to be made they should stick to the point of the article&#8230;.. what are the best beatles songs.<br />
There is so many, havn&#8217;t seen Mother Natures Sun, Cry Baby Cry or For No One!? Ace songs!!<br />
Martha My Dear Deserves a shout, think this was one of their finest, uplifting engligh song.<br />
Amazing though 40+ years later their music still touches so many people, think that alone says it all<br />
Much Love.xx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everybody's so toopid!</title>
		<link>http://listverse.com/2007/11/06/top-15-beatles-songs/#comment-209169</link>
		<dc:creator>Everybody's so toopid!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://listverse.com/music/top-15-beatles-songs/#comment-209169</guid>
		<description>Musical taste is incredibly subjective, everybody has their own opinion.. blahblahblah.
I know its been said already, but it never stops being true. ANyways, I think both Zep and the Beatles are awesome bands in their own right, but I have a love for Zeppelin that I just can&#039;t explain. But the Beatles are amazing too, and they provided the foundation allowing a band like Zeppelin to emerge, and I thank them for that. But really, The Beatles were a more creatively talented band, with John and Paul being musical geniuses, and occassionally George. Ringo... well, he&#039;s there. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Musical taste is incredibly subjective, everybody has their own opinion.. blahblahblah.<br />
I know its been said already, but it never stops being true. ANyways, I think both Zep and the Beatles are awesome bands in their own right, but I have a love for Zeppelin that I just can&#8217;t explain. But the Beatles are amazing too, and they provided the foundation allowing a band like Zeppelin to emerge, and I thank them for that. But really, The Beatles were a more creatively talented band, with John and Paul being musical geniuses, and occassionally George. Ringo&#8230; well, he&#8217;s there. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CastingCrowns</title>
		<link>http://listverse.com/2007/11/06/top-15-beatles-songs/#comment-207156</link>
		<dc:creator>CastingCrowns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://listverse.com/music/top-15-beatles-songs/#comment-207156</guid>
		<description>Honorable mentions:
I&#039;m Down
Birthday
Paperback Writer
You&#039;ve Got To Hide Your Love Away
Baby You Can Drive My Car
Get Back
One After 909
From Me To You
Dizzy Miss Lizzy
Taxman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honorable mentions:<br />
I&#8217;m Down<br />
Birthday<br />
Paperback Writer<br />
You&#8217;ve Got To Hide Your Love Away<br />
Baby You Can Drive My Car<br />
Get Back<br />
One After 909<br />
From Me To You<br />
Dizzy Miss Lizzy<br />
Taxman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh5687</title>
		<link>http://listverse.com/2007/11/06/top-15-beatles-songs/#comment-207121</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh5687</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://listverse.com/music/top-15-beatles-songs/#comment-207121</guid>
		<description>Where is Helter Skelter on this list...or I am the Walrus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is Helter Skelter on this list&#8230;or I am the Walrus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://listverse.com/2007/11/06/top-15-beatles-songs/#comment-206445</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 04:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://listverse.com/music/top-15-beatles-songs/#comment-206445</guid>
		<description>@Quick23 (&lt;a href=&#039;#comment-200946&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;332&lt;/a&gt;): Wow... both the Beatles and the Stones had (have?) much more homogenous sounding music than Zeppelin. The reason I say that is that the Stones all sounds the same, it does, seriously. The music&#039;s good, which is great, but it&#039;s the same thing over and over and over...

The Beatles, sure, they were tripping. They were different, maybe even amazing. But Zeppelin, so many different musical styles. Not only did they combine a more world music feel with contemporary popular music (at the time), but they also had a heavier side than the Beatles.

Seriously, pick up a copy of Zep III and In Through the Out Door and hear it for  yourself.

Zeppelin&#039;s only shortcoming was Bonham&#039;s death and their refusal to compromise, on either another drummer or inferior quality music. The Beatles and the Stones may have more music at the end of the day, but I&#039;m sure Zeppelin will settle for the title of &quot;Least Filler.&quot; Doesn&#039;t matter how long the set is, it matters how good the set is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Quick23 (<a href='#comment-200946' rel="nofollow">332</a>): Wow&#8230; both the Beatles and the Stones had (have?) much more homogenous sounding music than Zeppelin. The reason I say that is that the Stones all sounds the same, it does, seriously. The music&#8217;s good, which is great, but it&#8217;s the same thing over and over and over&#8230;</p>
<p>The Beatles, sure, they were tripping. They were different, maybe even amazing. But Zeppelin, so many different musical styles. Not only did they combine a more world music feel with contemporary popular music (at the time), but they also had a heavier side than the Beatles.</p>
<p>Seriously, pick up a copy of Zep III and In Through the Out Door and hear it for  yourself.</p>
<p>Zeppelin&#8217;s only shortcoming was Bonham&#8217;s death and their refusal to compromise, on either another drummer or inferior quality music. The Beatles and the Stones may have more music at the end of the day, but I&#8217;m sure Zeppelin will settle for the title of &#8220;Least Filler.&#8221; Doesn&#8217;t matter how long the set is, it matters how good the set is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quick23</title>
		<link>http://listverse.com/2007/11/06/top-15-beatles-songs/#comment-200946</link>
		<dc:creator>Quick23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://listverse.com/music/top-15-beatles-songs/#comment-200946</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my point about the Beatles versus the Rolling Stones versus Led Zeppelin.  First, I rate them 1-2-3 in that order as the three greatest musical groups in rock history.  Each of them could do a set of 25-30 songs and it would be better than any other set from any group.  What differentiates the Stones from Led Zep is that they could two more sets using entirely different material,and they&#039;d still be great concerts.  And what differentiates the Beatles from the Stones is that they could do a fourth and maybe even a fifth (i.e., 125-150 songs), and they&#039;d still be excellent.  BTW, I&#039;m approximately the same age as most of the Beatles and Stones members.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my point about the Beatles versus the Rolling Stones versus Led Zeppelin.  First, I rate them 1-2-3 in that order as the three greatest musical groups in rock history.  Each of them could do a set of 25-30 songs and it would be better than any other set from any group.  What differentiates the Stones from Led Zep is that they could two more sets using entirely different material,and they&#8217;d still be great concerts.  And what differentiates the Beatles from the Stones is that they could do a fourth and maybe even a fifth (i.e., 125-150 songs), and they&#8217;d still be excellent.  BTW, I&#8217;m approximately the same age as most of the Beatles and Stones members.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevie C</title>
		<link>http://listverse.com/2007/11/06/top-15-beatles-songs/#comment-199072</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevie C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://listverse.com/music/top-15-beatles-songs/#comment-199072</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m listening to Norwegian Wood now, it&#039;s great. My favorite Beatles songs are from the brilliant Revolver album like &#039;She Said, She, Said&#039; and &#039;Tomorrow Never Knows&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m listening to Norwegian Wood now, it&#8217;s great. My favorite Beatles songs are from the brilliant Revolver album like &#8216;She Said, She, Said&#8217; and &#8216;Tomorrow Never Knows&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
