http://listverse.com/2007/11/21/top-10-significant-firsts-in-law/ Ultimate Top 10 Lists - Listverse Sat, 26 May 2012 13:14:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://listverse.com/2007/11/21/top-10-significant-firsts-in-law/comment-page-1/#comment-475814 Wed, 04 Apr 2012 01:55:41 +0000 http://listverse.com/history/top-10-significant-firsts-in-law/#comment-475814 Name

]]> http://listverse.com/2007/11/21/top-10-significant-firsts-in-law/comment-page-1/#comment-474991 Sun, 01 Apr 2012 16:40:56 +0000 http://listverse.com/history/top-10-significant-firsts-in-law/#comment-474991 Name

]]> http://listverse.com/2007/11/21/top-10-significant-firsts-in-law/comment-page-1/#comment-471987 Wed, 21 Mar 2012 01:27:03 +0000 http://listverse.com/history/top-10-significant-firsts-in-law/#comment-471987 Name

]]> http://listverse.com/2007/11/21/top-10-significant-firsts-in-law/comment-page-1/#comment-369110 Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:05:53 +0000 http://listverse.com/history/top-10-significant-firsts-in-law/#comment-369110 Name

]]> http://listverse.com/2007/11/21/top-10-significant-firsts-in-law/comment-page-1/#comment-258506 Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:44:45 +0000 http://listverse.com/history/top-10-significant-firsts-in-law/#comment-258506 I don’t mean to be racist, but the lawyer picture is a little silly. I doubt any lawyers were black for some time after they came about.

]]> http://listverse.com/2007/11/21/top-10-significant-firsts-in-law/comment-page-1/#comment-248329 Thu, 28 Jan 2010 07:08:49 +0000 http://listverse.com/history/top-10-significant-firsts-in-law/#comment-248329 I think this possibly is the least comments I have ever seen on a list!

]]> http://listverse.com/2007/11/21/top-10-significant-firsts-in-law/comment-page-1/#comment-240864 Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:05:31 +0000 http://listverse.com/history/top-10-significant-firsts-in-law/#comment-240864 Интересно, а комменты которые не нравятся автору стирают?

]]> http://listverse.com/2007/11/21/top-10-significant-firsts-in-law/comment-page-1/#comment-219109 Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:59:09 +0000 http://listverse.com/history/top-10-significant-firsts-in-law/#comment-219109 marfang goofung

]]> http://listverse.com/2007/11/21/top-10-significant-firsts-in-law/comment-page-1/#comment-56017 Sat, 12 Apr 2008 23:57:18 +0000 http://listverse.com/history/top-10-significant-firsts-in-law/#comment-56017 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrus_Cylinder
pretty amazing ^^

]]> http://listverse.com/2007/11/21/top-10-significant-firsts-in-law/comment-page-1/#comment-15612 Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:45:48 +0000 http://listverse.com/history/top-10-significant-firsts-in-law/#comment-15612 Kelsi – You might find it interesting (and disheartening) to know that there was not women’s suffrage at the cantonal (state) level for every canton in Switzerland until 1990. I found this really ironic since Switzerland lays claim to having one of the oldest (consecutive) democracies in the world. Well, maybe for men, anyway.

]]>