[WARNING: This list contains content that may offend some readers] Museums are meant to have wide appeal as institutions of learning, but sometimes things go awry – as is the case in the following ten bizarre museums. Take a journey to the dark side of museum life with our top 10 bizarre museums!
10. Museum of Jurassic Technology
The museum claims to have a “specialized repository of relics and artifacts from the Lower Jurassic, with an emphasis on those that demonstrate unusual or curious technological qualities.” This explains the museum’s name and also suggests its puzzling nature, since the Lower Jurassic ended over 150 million years before the appearance of hominoids and in particular before anything that could be called technology. Some of the exhibits found in the museum are a collection of decomposing antique dice owned by magician Ricky Jay, a collection devoted to trailer park culture, entitled “Garden of Eden On Wheels”, an exhibit on household myths of years past, and a collection of micro-miniature sculptures and paintings, such as a sculpture of Pope John Paul II carved from a single human hair and placed within the eye of a needle.
Address: 9341 Venice Boulevard, Culver City, California 90232
9. British Lawnmower Museum
This museum includes over 400 vintage and experimental lawnmowers, highlighting the best of British technological ingenuity. Of particular interest are the 1921 ATCO Standard 9 Blade, a solar powered robot mower, and unusually fast or expensive mowers. Included in this Unique National collection are manufacturers not normally associated with the garden industry, names such as Rolls Royce, Royal Enfield, Daimler, Hawker Sidley, Perkins Diesel, British Leyland, Fraser Nash and many more. Most of the exhibit’s technical and industrial artifacts are from the Victorian and Edwardian era and the restored exhibits are devoted to keeping a small part of British engineering Heritage alive.
Address: 106-114 Shakespeare St., Southport, Lancashire, PR8 5AJ
8. Kansas Barbed Wire Museum
The Kansas Barbed Wire Museum in LaCrosse, Kansas is devoted solely to the history and legend of the early part of American history often referred to as the “Devils Rope”. On exhibit are over 2000 barbed wire varieties; including samples manufactured between the years 1870 and 1890. Hundreds of antique fencing tools illustrate the inventiveness of pioneers. The museum presents interesting ways to learn about one of the Midwest’s most important contributions to America’s history. Dioramas of early barbed wire use, a theatre featuring educational films, the Barbed Wire Hall of Fame, the museum archives room, and a research library all help to conjure up images of settling the Midwest.
Address: 120 W. 1st Street, LaCrosse, KS, 67548
7. Glore Psychiatric Museum
The Glore Psychiatric Museum brings to life the glorious history of psychiatric treatment through dioramas, models, and reproductions. The earliest form of therapy seems to have been administered with a sharp stick or club. By the Middle Ages treatment encompassed public humiliation, dunking, blistering, the ever-popular bleeding, and burning at the stake. Fortunately, by the 20th century, psychiatric treatment had evolved to include icy baths, tranquilizers, vibrating chairs, and electroshock therapy. Some of the more interesting objects on display include the tranquilizer chair, a things-swallowed-by-patients exhibit, and a giant hamster wheel for especially energetic patients.
Address: 3408 Frederick Ave., St. Joseph, MO (Be mindful not to drive into the entrance for the prison next door — they’re a little jumpy.)
6. The Creation Museum
The Creation Museum is a 60,000 square foot museum in the United States designed to promote young Earth creationism. The museum presents an account of the origins of the universe, life, mankind, and man’s early history according to a literal reading of the book of Genesis. Its exhibits reject evolution and assert that the earth and all of its life forms were created in 6 days just 6000 years ago and that man and dinosaurs once coexisted. The National Center for Science Education said:
“We, the undersigned scientists at universities and colleges in Kentucky, Ohio, and Indiana, are concerned about scientifically inaccurate materials at the Answers in Genesis museum. Students who accept this material as scientifically valid are unlikely to succeed in science courses at the college level. These students will need remedial instruction in the nature of science, as well as in the specific areas of science misrepresented by Answers in Genesis.”
The Guardian called the facility “quite possibly … one of the weirdest museums in the world.”
Address: 2800 Bullittsburg Church Rd. Petersburg, KY 41080
5. Museum of Eroticism
The Museum of Eroticism is a museum devoted to the erotic art collections of antique dealer Alain Plumey and French teacher Jo Khalifa. Founded in 1997 at 72 Boulevard de Clichy, the museum is situated in the Pigalle district of Paris, France. The collection ranges from the ancient religious art of India, Japan and Africa right up to contemporary art with an erotic focus. There are five floors, including a basement exhibition. One floor is devoted to maisons closes, the legal brothels of the 19th and early twentieth century.
Address: 72 Bd de Clichy, 75018 Paris, France
4. Icelandic Phallological Museum
The Icelandic Phallological Museum contains a collection of over one hundred penises and penile parts belonging to almost all the land and sea mammals that can be found in Iceland. Visitors to the museum will encounter thirty specimens belonging to twelve different kinds of whale, one specimen taken from a rogue polar bear, eighteen specimens belonging to seven different kinds of seal and walrus, and fifty one specimens originating from sixteen different kinds of land mammal: all in all, a total of one hundred specimens belonging to thirty six different kinds of mammal. The museum has also been fortunate enough to receive a legally-certified gift token for a future specimen belonging to a human.
Address: Hedinsbraut 3a, 640 Husavik, Iceland
3. Sulabh Museum of Toilets
At the Sulabh museum of toilets, you can see the evolution of the “loo” as well as catch up on the latest toilet jokes from around the world! Dr. Bindeshwar Pathak, the Founder of Sulabh International Social Service Organisation, a pioneering non-profit voluntary organisation (NGO) in the field of Sanitation in India, envisioned the need for the setting up of a museum of toilets in the sprawling campus of his central office, and has consultative status with Economic and Social Council of the UN!
Address: Mahavir Enclave, Palam Dabri Road, New Delhi, India
2. Mütter Museum Medical Museum
The museum is best known for its large collection of skulls and anatomical specimens including a wax model of a woman with a human horn growing out of her forehead, the tallest skeleton on display in North America, a 5′-long human colon that contained over 40 pounds of fecal matter, and the petrified body of the mysterious Soap Lady (image above), whose corpse was turned into a soapy substance called adipocere. The museum also houses a malignant tumor removed from President Grover Cleveland’s hard palate, the conjoined liver from Siamese twins Chang and Eng Bunker, and a growth removed from President Abraham Lincoln’s assassin, John Wilkes Booth. This is a must see place for a cold wintery day.
Address: 19 South 22nd Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19103.
1. Antique Vibrator Museum
In days long gone, doctors used vibrating devices in the treatment of “hysteria,” which they viewed as the most common health complaint among women of the day. Hysteria was a medical term developed to describe a woman’s display of mental or emotional distress, behavior then considered a disease in need of treatment. Good Vibrations’ founder, Joani Blank, collected antique vibrators for over 20 years. In this curious museum you get to see her entire collection, as well as more modern takes on the vibrator. Pictured above is a 1902 “Type A”, Hamilton Beach vibrator.
Address: 603 Valencia Street, San Francisco, CA 94110
This article is licensed under the GFDL because it contains quotations from the Wikipedia articles: Mutter Museum, Museum of Eroticism, The Creation Museum, and The Museum of Jurassic Technology.
Idreno:
1. I challenge you to produce even one of these “many pieces of evidence that disprove many of [evolution's] notions.”
2. Most of the work being done on the supposed “inefficacy” of carbon-14 dating is being funded by the Discovery Institute and its off-shoot subsidiaries. (i.e. the creationists, looking for evidence in favor of their looney ideas.)
3. Please post the link or the journal number of the article where you read about this “huge amount of recently discovered evidence” that suggests that human beings (the oldest recorded “homo” fossil being only a little over 10,000 years old) coexisted with dinosaurs (the most recent specimin of which is determined to have been a little more than 64 million years old).
It’s good to have an open mind about things, but not so open that you let your brain fall right out of your head.
ahhh! i love this new layout/icon!
great list! keep up the awesome site!
Idreno:
Open minds are good. Weak, flabby minds are unattractive and silly, and women tend not to sleep with them.
There is not one valid piece of evidence that disproves or even challenges evolution. Sorry, “Id,” but it’s a fact.
Neither are there any valid challenges to ANY of the traditional, well-tested means of dating fossils. As SlickWilly points out, what work has been done has been funded by creationists and is dangerously and stupidly biased. Science is not supposed to be dangerously and stupidly biases, it is supposed to be objective. Those that claim objectivity while laboring under various biases are not objective, they are idiots, cads, and examples of aforementioned weak minds (who probably aren’t gettin’ any).
Anthropoid, let alone Homo Sapien co-existence with dinosaurs is nonsense and is proven nonsense. Really, skepticism is healthy, but *moronic* skepticism ain’t cool.
Randall: I disagree with one aspect of your statement. You said
I know for a fact that a fanatic is most *****ually turned on by fanaticism, thus all one has to do is find a like mind.
Idreno; the south american dinosaur thing was not dinosaurs, but large birds and mammals, kinda like the Moa in Australia. The age of mammals I do believe. C’mon check da facts.
edit to above post: “the oldest recorded “homo” fossil being only a little over 10,000 years old” should read either:
“the oldest recorded ‘homo sapien’”
OR
“a little over 100,000 years old”
(I believe I meant the first one, but if you replace the second one, it’s also true.) Either way, my point remains the same.
JFRATER!!!!!: How come we arn’t allowed to edit posts, anymore? I seem to recall that we used to have a half hour to revise our posts before they were written in stone.
Mom424: The moa is (or was) a native of New Zealand. Those damn Aussies try to steal anything of ours that is/was halfway decent.
SlickWilly: I removed that functionality quite a while ago (a month or two before Christmas) in order to speed up the site. If I find a better alternative I will consider adding that in later
I second Another Kiwi – the Moa was an indigenous bird in New Zealand which was wiped out by the Maoris who used its flesh for food and its feathers for garments. It has never existed outside of NZ
jfrater;another kiwi; i apologize for giving credit where it was not due, you guys wiped out the moas…
and jamie I was nice to you about the garter snake fiasco….
though i am completely for the evolution theory. there is some, not PROOF, but intresting facts that dont seem to work with evolution. http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/bowdenmalcolm/evol.htm
Schiesl: I would just like to point out where the site you found stems from. Just some food for thought. http://homepage.ntlworld.com/malcolmbowden/
I must say, the list was great, but #9 and #8 seemed rather b*****…I think they could have been replaced with something else. (someone mentioned the Pez museum, that would be great!)Everything else on the list was really interesting. If I ever go to the United States I may have to look up some of these.
Hehe, last year in AP euro we watched a movie called “Inhaling the Spore” which was about the Museum of Jurassic Technology. They had some really interesting/creepy stuff. I would love to visit one of these someday!
AWEsome list!! Really creative!
two I know of (both in Minneapolis) are the Bakken Museum of Electricity in Life, and the Museum of Questionable Medical Devices. I’ve heard of the Jurassic Tech museum, but haven’t ever been there.
With regards to the facile responses to #6 and the assertion that evolution must be disproved or else accepted, I believe those responses blatantly ridiculous.
So I suggest the following:
1. There is not one case where an animal suddenly birthed a completely new animal (e.g. Dogs don’t give birth to cats). If someone has evidence of such please list all reference sources.
Remember I am not talking about variations in a group I am talking about something entirely new.
2. In the scientific ambit the person posing a theory must prove it is true, and to assert that someone must disprove what is stated in a theory flies against the who point of the scientific method.
Again if someone can show where a theory is to be accepted as law before it is proven please list sources.
3. Explain the “evolution” of the eye. Show proof of development. Wait you can’t, which is why we know have the punctuated equilibrium theory of evolution where the non-existence of proof is proof.
Woo hoo, I’m ready to buy the bridge now Mr Demille.
4. Evolution, no matter what anti-creationist might like to think, is merely an act of faith not science.
Now since I have just posited that evolution is an act of faith and not science you, the anti-creationist, must prove scientifically that belief in evolution is not an act of faith.
Of course, like the evolutionist, I reserve the right to judge the soundness of your “conclusions” and determine whether your are right or wrong.
great list! i love museums!
i’ve read about some sort of a birth defect museum, somewhere in kazakhstan, but i haven’t been able to find much information/pictures. help??
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/08/30/btsc.chance.nukes/index.html
The (now defunct) Dime Museum in Baltimore was one of a kind. I had a chance to see the collection of oddities during its last year opened and am saddened by its loss.
Speaking of Baltimore- John Waters’ living room is one bizarre museum. I havent been in his actual living room but an exact-lifesize cardboard re-creation of it! No kidding.
The Mutter Museum is as it has always been, except for a pre-exhibit maze you must go through to get to the central gallery.
The large wooden chest of tiny drawes filled with objects people have swallowed is of particuliar interest, along with the beautiful wax heads and body parts, and not to forget the original plast death-cast of eng and chang bunker.
Others have mention torture museums. I’ll add the Kriminal Museum in Rothenburg. When I was there, they suposably had the only original iron maiden still intact in the world. I dont know, that might have just been a tourist draw. What I found so interesting was , Rothenburg is a walled in village and the buildings havent changed much. A number of their old documents showed various humiliation devises (along with the actual devises depicted) on the locals of the time, and you could find where the unfortunates were placed in and around the main square.
Heatherrrr:
A quick search and I find some info regarding the Anatomy Department of the Semey Medical Faculty.
so type that in and look around.
Horrifying- A nuclear testing zone and once Dostoevsky place of exile.
Incipiat;
Evolution does not state that one animal gave birth to a brand new species; it happened gradually over time. Some changes, due to catastrophic events. ie; climate change, meteoric cataclysm etc. happened quicker than others, but none over night
2; See 3
The eye thing….
Scientists today believe that the eye could evolve from a single light-sensing cell. Scientists disagree over whether it evolved just once, or many times.
It turns out that Nature is both creative and generous with her gifts. Recent research has shown that the tiny marine worm Platynereis dumerilii has two types of light-sensing cells. The eyes of the worm have rhabdomeric photoreceptors, a compound lens formation that is seen almost exclusively in insect eyes. Rhabdomeric photoreceptors are covered in little finger-like protrusions. In its brain, however, it has a different kind of light-sensing cells – ciliary cells that are seen in vertebrate animals. Ciliary cells have hair-like cilia that extend outward and branch out like tiny umbrellas. Two different ways of sensing light in a single organism!
Researcher Joachim Wittbrodt of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory in Heidelberg, Germany speculates that the ciliary cells may regulate the worm’s daily activity cycle, saying “We think they are related to circadian rhythms. We have found that there is a direct connection to the area used for locomotion… In the beginning we had a toolbox… what was in the brain in the worm ends up in our eye.” If the animal had two copies of the genes needed to make one kind of photoreceptor, speculates Wittbrodt, then the extra set would have been free to evolve into the other photoreceptor. Different animals would subsequently evolve to use the two options in different ways.
This is a quote from Livescience.com
http://www.livescience.com/technology/technovelgy_eyes_041104.html
faith is not science…i have both
ah i wish i would have known that. My friend sent it too me when i told asked him about what he thought of evolution…so ill talk to him about it, lol
It’s a good thing that you don’t offer a prize to the 100th comment from this list
I live just down the road from the Kinsey Institute. You guys ever heard of it, or are familiar with Dr. Kinsey? Pretty cool. You can’t just walk in, it’s verrrrry guarded, but sometimes they have exhibits for the general public. Awsome stuff. By the way, that’s in Bloomington, Indiana.
Creation Museum – what a joke. Does not at all advance their cause, but rather, points out the utter ridiculousness of it.
In Toronto we have the Bata Shoe museum. There was a controversy a few years back when a pair of rare slippers worth tens of thousands of dollars were, uh, slippernapped and held for ransom. The footware was eventually recovered. It’s a must-see for shoe-fetishists!
ooh I love this list… my favs are defo the medical variety… Over here in the UK there are a few interesting museums…
Although it is quite/very touristy and quiet expensive I did actually enjoy ‘Madam Tausauds – The London Dungeon’ commercial but I love seeing the devices used – the one in Moscow (sorry I dont have a reference) seems more ‘hands on’.
Incipiat:
1. As Mom424 already pointed out, evolution does not happen by an animal of one species giving birth to an animal of another species. If you think this is how evolution works, I suggest you go catch up on the last 100 years of biological science because you are woefully misinformed.
2. You are correct about the need for evidence and support for a hypothesis to be considered a theory. However, the theory has been around for nigh over 100 years, with a vast amount of evidence in its favor. In fact, there is so much evidence FOR it and so little evidence AGAINST it that is the accepted biological explanation for speciation in 99% of the academic community. I have to add 2 things here:
a. This 99% of the academic community has studied evolution for longer than you have been alive. Do you happen to have a pHD in biological science? No? Why, then, are YOU more qualified to make assumptions about the validity than they are?
b. When a theory is being proposed, the burden of proof is one the one who proposed it. When it has been accepted, by and large, as truth by the majority of science, the burden of proof then falls on those people trying to disprove it. The burden of proof here is NOT on our shoulders, but rather on yours. In a trial, the burden of proof always, always, always lies with the prosecuter. If you want to challenge evolution, YOU have to provide evidence against it. It is not the other way around.
3. Mom424 provided some good reading material on speculation into the development of the eye. I suggest you actually do some research before you go off half-cocked, talking about things you know nothing about. This is woefully apparent by your misunderstanding of the Punctuated Equilibrium theory. And for dog’s sake, the non-existence of proof is NEVER considered proof of anything. Scientists implicitly know this. We could only hope creationists would realize it too.
4. There are certain educated speculations that need to be made in the theory of evolution, and there are certain truths that are held to be self-evident. However, the science of evolution is hardly considered a faith. The vast majority of evidence we have comes from replicable experiments. In order to postulate an experiment, something concrete in the theory must be realized to be taken advantage of and manipulated. Creationists like to level all kinds of ad-hominem attacks against evolutionists, but only because they have no REAL feet to stand on in the matter.
As an aside on this particular question: You need to posit a hyptothesis and show evidence to support it before you can invite people to refute it. All you did was make a hypothesis that evolution is a faith, and provided no supporting evidence. The burden of proof still lies with you, sir. I’ll be glad to handily refute you once you put together some kind of case.
You have every right to judge the soundness of my response. However, you are not a scientist, so your judgement in the matter has little say. You are, instead, a dangerously biased layman, and as a direct consequence, your consideration of “soundness” is skewed. I would like you to keep that in mind wen responding to this post.
Slickwilly; what you said…..
pretty neat how a layperson like myself, who doesn’t represent themselves as a scientist, is more well-read (at least when it comes to science)than someone who is represents themselves as such. People can use as many large words and old movie references as they like, and still spew bull*****.
man this one should be number one
Museum of Menstruation which has exhibits about the world cultural history of menstruation.
http://www.mum.org
Mom424: Ummm….I’m not quite sure what your beef here is. I was taking YOUR side. I said you provided some good reading material for Mr. Incipiat and that he should perhaps do some research on his own before he tries to say that the research doesn’t exist, especially since the piece you picked out is readily available online. You may be a layman, but at least you are an intelligent layman. I consider myself a scientist, but compared to those phD’s I mentioned, I’m nothing but a layman myself, considering I’m still in graduate school. However…I have done my research, unlike Incipiat. It appeared to me as if you had done your research as well.
I’m sorry if you think I’m “spewing bull*****.” If you really feel that way, please point out to me what I said that you thought was bull***** and we can discuss it.
Mom424: Incidentally, how can you say that you are more well-read in science than I am? I haven’t given any indication that I am an expert, as I have pointed out at least twice that I’m not a doctor of anything, yet. In addition, other than pointing to an online article underscoring the point you were making (using a lot more big words than I was, actually
) there was nothing in your post to suggest that you are an expert either. You don’t know me, and I don’t know you. You could be a fellowship holder at a leading research institute, or you could be a cashier at McDonald’s. The same goes for me.
Like I said, I was in support of you. I was NOT in support of incipiat, most likely because I am a student of evolution science, and adamant creationists irk me a little. Combined with his bravado in challenging the science of evolution and his lack of knowledge on the subject, I was incensed. Perhaps I shouldn’t have been, but that’s just the way I am. Maybe you could explain to me why you posted the comment you did, insulting me.
Slickwilly; I was complimenting you;,,what you said,,,means I wish I said it….i was agreeing with you….and speaking of Incipiat…not yourself…damn internet…can’t read my tone…my apologies….
I was actually backing you up, you didn’t use the Cecil B. Demille reference (he was referring to bridge on the river Kwai, I believe)….lordy what a mess I’ve caused…
Mom424: Boy, am I red in the face. My apologies to you as well. We’ve gotten along so well over the past few threads….I would hate to break that now, when our online bull*****ting relationship is still in its infancy.
Slickwilly; not as much as me,,,I really don’t like to offend anyone on purpose,,,unless they post faith as science of course.
And even then I try not to attack their faith, just their *****ty fake science….
Mom, Slick:
See, you people get all up on my back about TONE in my postings and then YOU go and do it! Why? Cuz you just don’t LISTEN.
sheesh, I am picked on and picked on here and not an ounce of love, and I KNOW it’s not ME, it’s YOU.
(and yes,”Slick,” this is a joke).
Randall:
Goddamnit, Randall, I’m sick and tired of you coming in to these forums and injecting them with your knowledge and wit. I mean, if it weren’t for you and few others on this site, it might very well just be a boiling cauldron of ignorance, the kind of environment a middle-level pseudo-intellectual like myself thrives on. How about backing off for a change and letting the peons work stuff out for ourselves?
And believe it or not, I do have a sense of humor.
SlickWilly: This isn’t the forums. Ha! Ha! Me funny!
Number 2 said “This is a must see place for a cold wintery day.”
That is one of the best lines that I have read on this site in a while.
Randall, Slickwilly; smooches to all….
These are some badass wepons, wish i had a chariot like #1 for a car, that’d be awesome!
There is a museum in Manitowish Waters Wisconsin called Little Bohemia where Dillenger had a shootout with government officials. Maybe not bizzare but the house where the shootout occurred is still there. Everything is intact, broken windows bullet holes in the walls, and even the suitcases and clothes they left. Again maybe not bizzare but strange.
No mention of the Cockroach Hall of Fame in Plano, TX? http://www.pestshop.com
Obligatory bomb-throw on the Creationism discussion: It has always amazed me that people who believe in a man’s being made from clay (later screwed out of his place in Eden by a talking snake, no less) seem to have a problem with the strawman idea that a monkey turned into a man or a dog turned into a cat. Can I get some references for clay turning into a human being, or a snake’s speaking? How is this different from the “theory” of a man’s being licked out of a salt block by a cow, in the religion of the Norsemen?
Regarding the notion of evolution=cosmology, think of it this way: I can demonstrate to you that Latin evolved into the Romance languages. No Latin speaker just woke up one morning in Toledo speaking Spanish, though, and the process took time. However, that I cannot document (except through philology) the existence of Latin’s mother tongue (Proto-IndoEuropean) in no way invalidates that Latin evolved into Spanish and the other Romance languages. That we have questions about things that occurred during that evolution — why do we have -y on “soy,” “voy,” and “estoy,” when those aren’t present in Latin or Old Spanish — neither invalidates that, well, Latin evolved into Spanish in parts of the Iberian peninsula. No regard for origins here.
QDV: Absolutely. When most people think of evolution and natural selection, they think of speciation in animals and plants. Alot of people don’t realize that those same forces are at work in many other arenas as well! Language is a perfect example. So is society, in general. So is technology. So are paradigms, both scientific and un-scientific! I think it’s great that you brought that up, as it offers a perfect *****ogy to those that arn’t as well informed on the idea of evolution as to how evolution tends to work. Spanish did’t just pop up one day out of Latin….it was a slow process that developed through ruralization and…I’m sure you say this coming….isolation! Perhaps not *****ual isolation, as is one of the catalysts of evolution in animals….but isolation just the same. A certain collective group of people come together and start communicating with little outside interference. That’s how Spanish, Italian, Portugese, etc. (all the romantic languages) came about….you could say that Latin is their Most Recent Common Ancestor!
Hahaha….I’m all giddy now. I think I take my studies a little too seriously.
QVD, SlickWilly; I agree with Slick (again), wonderful *****ogy/parallel. I never thought of using the evolution of language in the battle against willful militant ignorance. It won’t matter a damn though, can’t fight faith with reason, much as we try. Note the lack of reply from Incipiat…
Ok, people, enough about evolution/creation, there’s a frickin’ penis museum!!! Hello!!!!
Mom424: I’m giving him(her) the benefit of the doubt. Maybe he(she) will come back to the table with something we can actually have an educated discussion about.
Angelina: Hahahaha…..Freud would have a field day with you.
I wonder if the vibrator museum has a Steely Dan?
treypole: Wouldn’t bet on it. I seem to recall steely dan was just a huge metal dildo. I don’t think it vibrated at all, though Burroughs doesn’t address it in detail.
hey this is wierd stuff mmmaannn… coolio… is anyone there
Hey, I used to live by the Lawnmower Museum! Ok, it’s no Eroticism Museum, but hey, you can’t have it all.
Angelina; I live with six guys, I don’t need a penis museum. Come to think of it, I’m so sick of men I think I’ll be a lesbian in my next life…
As a Christian i am somewhat offended that the creation museum was listed. why is it so impossible to believe in creation and so easy for people to accept something so ridiculous as evolution?
b: why is it impossible for you to believe in evolution when you so easily accept something as ridiculous as creationism?
Scientific answers to evolution have been done through tested experiments with repeatable results. Bible answers question of creation with: “Just because”…….
Here’s an eye opening thought: Maybe the Bible was written by a bunch of drunk men…. as a joke. As i said, just a thought. :O
there is also the Salt and Pepper Shaker museum in Gatlinburg, Tennessee
haha the Barbed wire museum!!! In quebec we have the snowmobile museum.