Comments on: Top 10 Misconceptions About The Bible

By: R.H.Lucas.

R.H.Lucas. — Thu, 24 May 2012 08:04:51 +0000

Very well observed, it just goes to show again that it’s humans that err but the Word is correct with instructions that by there very nature show that there must be a reason unknow to us at present. Why this, why that?
Only those in the know can explain and when it’s mans instruction rather than Gods there is often no time or need to explain, especially to those whose minds are not excercised enough to work things out.
Hence endless fruitless debating and “striving about words to no effect.”

An example is the specific instruction to circumcise male children on the eighth day – now known “medically” to be a unique day on which the blood clots faster in the developing body than at any other time.

By: Ewok

Ewok — Thu, 24 May 2012 04:23:04 +0000

Genesis 7:2-3 “Of every clean beast you will take seven males and seven females and of the beasts which are not clean, two, the male and his female; and of the birds of the air, seven males and seven females, so that their seed may still be living on the face of the earth.” (Bible in Basic English) you have written ‘all clean animals went in groups of seven and unclean animals in groups of two’ it should read either ‘all clean animals went in groups of fourteen and unclean animals in groups of two’ or ‘all clean animals went in pairs of seven and unclean animals in a pair’.

By: LoneQuietus

LoneQuietus — Mon, 14 May 2012 23:28:23 +0000

It makes sense in Bible Logic. Jesus didn’t commit suicide because he let himself die, it doesn’t count because it wasn’t his effort. Similarly, God, in Job, is abdicated from blame because, hey, Satan did the bad junk, not God. He just ‘let’ it happen.

By: mac

mac — Tue, 01 May 2012 10:49:07 +0000

listen only to the word of GOD. read the KJV only. stay away from newer copies. i love GOD with all my heart.

By: BreakingDawn

BreakingDawn — Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:58:46 +0000

You forgot the biggest misconception…that we should take the bible seriously and not like a giant work of fiction that it is. Of course religious zealots who take this seriously might get angry…

By: Sinner

Sinner — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:43:41 +0000

Hi there is a Dark face, the holy face of lucca Italy, or loot santo. Look it up.

By: Reasoningdoubt

Reasoningdoubt — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:59:11 +0000

Do you ever shut-up?!

By: ava wilson

ava wilson — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:19:37 +0000

I agrees with alls of yous. I am a self diagnose asspbugers moron with no high school deploma. I hate christiuns and take every oppupptunity to show it. Why do i have all dese lines under my words?
I do not wurk and live off the governement. i spend all my time on the computer and i am all dat.
if u have a problem i work as da supu moderater at the compassion pit. i can lissen to you and help you wif your problums.
come see me here. http://www.compassionpit.com/forum/member.php?u=4209

By: ava wilson

ava wilson — Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:42:44 +0000

i is a self diagnose moron buts agrees wit u

By: Scholar

Scholar — Fri, 06 Jan 2012 17:18:32 +0000

Just an FYI, #2 is way off. Yes, Constantine didn’t define the canon himself (he couldn’t have cared less about what it actually said), but he was the driving force behind it. He put his main religion fellow, Eusebius, on a mission to find a definitive text that he could place throughout all the churches, for political unification purposes. This text didnt exist, so he surveyed the churches to find a general consensus (which did not include Revelation! Constantine, alone, is the reason Revelation was included.. He liked it). The idea that there was already a “definitive canon” is simply not true, and it’s just absurd to say it was so in the early second century. That was absolutely not the case at all.. In fact, apart from Eusebius’ primary list of Scripture that was eventually “canonized,” there didn’t emerge a “definitive canon” until somewhere around the 7th century. Early Christians did not share the same understanding as Greco-Romans when it came to uniformity, so they had no business desiring a “canon” of Scripture. That was done because of a cultural infusion and political maneuvering, very much at the hand of Constantine.

See:
Constantine’s Bible – David Dungan;
The Biblical Canon – LM McDonald.