- The Prophet’s private life is precisely that, you scallywag. You crossed the line when mentioning stuff outside the quote l rendered.

To anybody else reading:
* Lady ‘Aisha had reached maturity, a woman must reach maturity in Islam i.e. nature must say “yes”, not a politician. With a set age of marriage, a girl might not even reach maturity by that age.
* This was by all appearance nothing out of the ordinary for anybody in the world at the time, even up to the Industrial Revolution in the western world.
* The Prophet’s wives all wished to marry him, and they were all content to do so.
* This is marriage, not sexual assault, and it’s shocking, and telling, that some folk cannot see the difference. Marriage is a life-long commitment.
* Let’s not forget that Judaism, in the Talmud, allows sex at the age of 3 years and 1 day, but even then some Rabbis didn’t wait that long, and that a non-Jewish girl can be married via rape, but if marriage is actioned in this way, she may never be divorced. How utterly disgusting. How evil, evil that l pray God punishes with eternally-increasing fire.
* Oh and let’s not forget the disgusting 3-way daddy and 2 daughters incest and tens of other such cases in the Bible. IN LIGHT OF THIS, ONLY AN INCESTUOUS PEDOPHILIC RAPIST CAN SEE JUDAISM AND CHRISTIANITY AS BETTER THAN ISLAM. THIS REFERS TO MODERN JUDAISM AND CHRISTIANITY, WHICH ARE CORRUPTED AND NOTHING LIKE THEIR ORIGINAL FORMS, AND NOT EVEN LIKE THEIR FORMS AT THE TIME OF THE ADVENT OF ISLAM. THAT IS WHY ISLAM CONFERS SPECIAL PROTECTION TO JEWS AND CHRISTIANS – BECAUSE THESE 2 RELIGIONS WERE STILL RELATIVELY UNCORRUPTED AT THE TIME – I AM GUESSING.

“And Go read the quraan for ur self and see how much filth its got about sex, it sounds alot like the old testament.”

- People often write such things about the Qur’an, this is a common technique not just applied to attacking Islam. Sometimes, in a heated situation, people will make innuendoes and sneak off before being held to account. “Jesus”, the author of Post 204 is such an one. The fact is: There is no “filth about sex” in the Qur’an. It is nothing like the Old Testament for this and countless other reasons, each reason as disturbing as the last.

The hallmark of the “sneaking whisperer” who spreads innuendo: They will never elaborate. They might even give verse reference, but not the actual verses. And if, on very rare occasions, they give the verse, it will be with parentheses inserts and all manner of skullduggery. Or, the verse will be shockingly out of context. For example, one man once gave a verse reference in the Qur’an as saying that Muslims believe God is on the side of Satan.

The quote in question, when followed up, turned out to say that Satan/Sinners planned and God planned too, in the attempt to kill Jesus, confounded by God’s superior planning.

“Dont mix the new and the old testamnet together beucz as christians we follow the new testament.”

- Why not judge the books together? They are all part of The Bible. They are all “Holy Books” of Christianity and partly of Judaism. Oddly enough, this debate is about the “Holy Books” of Christianity and Judaism, so it is correct to talk about the “Holy Books” of Christianity and Judaism, when discussing the “Holy Books” of Christianity and Judaism, no matter how much that might inconvenience you, it is correct.

Oh and did that muslim guy also tell you how their so called prophet mohammed married a girl at the age of 6 years old when he was 55 years old and had sex with her at the age of 9. And Go read the quraan for ur self and see how much filth its got about sex, it sounds alot like the old testament. Dont mix the new and the old testamnet together beucz as christians we follow the new testament.

What’s just baffling is how many mental hoops a believer will jump though to deny inconsistancies in the Bible. Gotta love how belivers will justify even baby killers as godly men.