<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Quirkiest Early Flying Machines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://listverse.com/2008/08/02/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://listverse.com/2008/08/02/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/</link>
	<description>Ultimate Top 10 Lists - Listverse</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:52:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mintzy</title>
		<link>http://listverse.com/2008/08/02/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/#comment-217353</link>
		<dc:creator>mintzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://listverse.com/science/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/#comment-217353</guid>
		<description>number 2 looks great! it looks really artsy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>number 2 looks great! it looks really artsy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://listverse.com/2008/08/02/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/#comment-89171</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 18:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://listverse.com/science/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/#comment-89171</guid>
		<description>Jfr,

I&#039;ve just popped in here from reading a number of other better supported lists, and I think I&#039;ve sussed the problem. You MUST deliberately leave out one or two really important entries. If you do that you&#039;ll have the whole of LV posting in the topic and down on you like a ton of bricks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jfr,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just popped in here from reading a number of other better supported lists, and I think I&#8217;ve sussed the problem. You MUST deliberately leave out one or two really important entries. If you do that you&#8217;ll have the whole of LV posting in the topic and down on you like a ton of bricks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://listverse.com/2008/08/02/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/#comment-88301</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 05:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://listverse.com/science/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/#comment-88301</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the trouble was too that no one filed any of those controversial idiot remarks we know-alls could have refuted indignantly with bucket-loads of extra information. (Or havn&#039;t yet.) Thinking about it, I believe my proposed list will draw them though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the trouble was too that no one filed any of those controversial idiot remarks we know-alls could have refuted indignantly with bucket-loads of extra information. (Or havn&#8217;t yet.) Thinking about it, I believe my proposed list will draw them though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: segue</title>
		<link>http://listverse.com/2008/08/02/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/#comment-88275</link>
		<dc:creator>segue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 03:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://listverse.com/science/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/#comment-88275</guid>
		<description>I also expected more in the way of responses. I even forwarded the list to my husband, a retired U.S. Air Force navigator, thinking he&#039;d enjoy it and perhaps want to comment.
When I asked him about it, he said that yes, he liked it, but he&#039;d already known all of them, and more, and what was there to say?
So, I&#039;m sorry, but maybe the fact is that too many of us just knew the information already.
I still think it&#039;s an excellent list, though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also expected more in the way of responses. I even forwarded the list to my husband, a retired U.S. Air Force navigator, thinking he&#8217;d enjoy it and perhaps want to comment.<br />
When I asked him about it, he said that yes, he liked it, but he&#8217;d already known all of them, and more, and what was there to say?<br />
So, I&#8217;m sorry, but maybe the fact is that too many of us just knew the information already.<br />
I still think it&#8217;s an excellent list, though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ciunas</title>
		<link>http://listverse.com/2008/08/02/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/#comment-88250</link>
		<dc:creator>ciunas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 01:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://listverse.com/science/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/#comment-88250</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an excellent list &amp; I love the illustrations. But I&#039;m not sure there&#039;s much to say beyond that. (At least nobody chimed in with anything along the lines of &#039;If God had meant us to fly he&#039;d have given us wings&#039;... That would have boosted the number of comments...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an excellent list &amp; I love the illustrations. But I&#8217;m not sure there&#8217;s much to say beyond that. (At least nobody chimed in with anything along the lines of &#8216;If God had meant us to fly he&#8217;d have given us wings&#8217;&#8230; That would have boosted the number of comments&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://listverse.com/2008/08/02/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/#comment-88246</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 01:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://listverse.com/science/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/#comment-88246</guid>
		<description>Jfr,

Never mind the numbers, feel the quality. I&#039;d have expected a lot more response too. I even remember Randall writing somewhere he was interested in aircraft. Maybe I should give up the idea of writing something along similar lines myself soon, but I wouldn&#039;t do a list I didn&#039;t thoroughly enjoy researching and learning from anyway. Thanks from one grateful customer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jfr,</p>
<p>Never mind the numbers, feel the quality. I&#8217;d have expected a lot more response too. I even remember Randall writing somewhere he was interested in aircraft. Maybe I should give up the idea of writing something along similar lines myself soon, but I wouldn&#8217;t do a list I didn&#8217;t thoroughly enjoy researching and learning from anyway. Thanks from one grateful customer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kris</title>
		<link>http://listverse.com/2008/08/02/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/#comment-88150</link>
		<dc:creator>kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://listverse.com/science/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/#comment-88150</guid>
		<description>are these machines still there???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are these machines still there???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfrater</title>
		<link>http://listverse.com/2008/08/02/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/#comment-88074</link>
		<dc:creator>jfrater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://listverse.com/science/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/#comment-88074</guid>
		<description>I am amazed at how little attention this list has received!  It took ages to write!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am amazed at how little attention this list has received!  It took ages to write!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vera Lynn</title>
		<link>http://listverse.com/2008/08/02/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/#comment-88003</link>
		<dc:creator>Vera Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 04:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://listverse.com/science/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/#comment-88003</guid>
		<description>We used to have to shovel the roofs and carports so that they would&#039;t cave in under the weight of the snow. We would jump off the roof into 8 feet of snow (during a good winter only)or huge snow banks where the snow had drifted. That was too cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We used to have to shovel the roofs and carports so that they would&#8217;t cave in under the weight of the snow. We would jump off the roof into 8 feet of snow (during a good winter only)or huge snow banks where the snow had drifted. That was too cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: segue</title>
		<link>http://listverse.com/2008/08/02/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/#comment-87837</link>
		<dc:creator>segue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://listverse.com/science/top-10-quirkiest-early-flying-machines/#comment-87837</guid>
		<description>#30. jfrater
segue: ouch!
**
The  bigger ouch was when my mum was removing the dratted thorns!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#30. jfrater<br />
segue: ouch!<br />
**<br />
The  bigger ouch was when my mum was removing the dratted thorns!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
