The US presidential elections are mere weeks away and everyone is abuzz with election fever. So now, as the States prepares to elect their latest president, it seems a good time to look at some previous hopefuls – hopefuls that you will be damned glad never won the race! So, here are the 5 worst presidential candidates who (thankfully) lost. If you can think of others you would add to the list, be sure to tell us in the comments.
At the Democratic National Convention of 1948, delegates officially adopted a pro-civil rights platform for the first time, which was quickly embraced by President Harry Truman. Some Democrats, however, did not like this at all, and the delegations from a number of Southern states marched out of the convention to have their own. This breakaway party called themselves the “States’ Rights Democrats” or the “Dixiecrats,” and they nominated then-Governor Strom Thurmond of South Carolina for the presidency. Running under the slogan, “Segregation Forever,” Thurmond hoped to keep the federal government from ever interfering with the Jim Crow laws that his party valued so much. Even though their message did not play well throughout most of the United States, the Dixiecrats managed to win the electoral votes of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and South Carolina. Thurmond’s third-place finish might seem impressive by today’s standards, but in reality his loss allowed Democrats to reject segregationists and to support the Civil Rights Movement – which two decades later finally succeeded.
Strom Thurmond wasn’t the only Democrat who felt betrayed by the party platform in 1948. Henry Wallace was the former Vice-President who had served under Franklin Roosevelt, but was replaced by Harry Truman in the Election of 1944. Wallace’s main beef with the party, however, had nothing to do with segregation (which he opposed), and everything to do with the Soviet Union (which he supported). In his first term as president, Harry Truman called for an aggressive stance against Communism and, in particular, the Soviet Union under Josef Stalin. Former Vice-President Wallace, however, did not like this part of the Democratic platform. So in response, he decided to run for the presidency as the Progressive Party candidate – which had a platform emphasizing trust in Stalin and giving American Communists a voice in government. In fact, Wallace’s Soviet-friendly stances were extreme enough that even many socialists refused to support him. On election day, the Progressive Party failed to win a single state or electoral vote, which further pushed American Communists into obscurity. Wallace retired from politics after his loss, and in time grew to regret his opposition to the policies of Harry Truman and the Democratic Party.
In 1872, Horace Greeley was a newspaper publisher and former one-term congressman from New York. He had also been an ardent abolitionist and a founding-father of the Republican Party. But after the Civil War, he grew to despise the presidency of Republican Ulysses S. Grant – who favored the continuation of Southern Reconstruction. Greeley thought that the South had been punished hard enough, and called for a withdrawal of Union forces from the former Confederacy. When Grant was up for re-election in 1872, Greeley ran for, and subsequently won, the nomination of the “Liberal Republican Party”. Surprisingly, the Democratic Party loved his platform of ending Reconstruction so much that they decided to nominate him too. The American people, however, were not quite as enthusiastic about Greeley, and on election day he suffered an embarrassing loss to Grant, only winning a handful of former slave states. But even if he had won, Greeley would have never made it to the presidency, since a month after the election he went crazy and died a few days later.
Despite having dominated politics throughout the 1850s, the Democratic Party of 1860 was in serious trouble. Over the issue of slavery, the Party was split in two. One faction, the “Northern Democrats” under Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois, was more moderate and supported the rights of people in their own jurisdictions to decide whether slavery should be legal or not. The other group that emerged was the “Southern Democrats,” which supported government protection of slavery as a property right. They nominated incumbent Vice-President John C. Breckenridge, a politician from Kentucky, for the presidency. Running on his hard-line pro-slavery platform, he became the favorite candidate of the American South. But the splitting of the Democratic Party allowed for another candidate – former Congressman Abraham Lincoln of Illinois – to dominate in the North, which was at the time the most populous and held the most electoral votes. Lincoln thus managed to win the presidency against both Democrats, as well as third-party candidate John Bell. After Breckenridge lost the election, the Civil War began and he soon joined the Confederacy.
The Presidential election of 1800 may be one of the most bizarre in American history. Incumbent President John Adams, a Federalist, was running for re-election. His challenger happened to be his own vice-president, Thomas Jefferson, who represented the Democratic-Republican Party. Adams was unpopular and indeed handily lost the election to Jefferson. But in those days the Constitution still had a few kinks in it, and one of those kinks was the rule that each presidential elector must vote twice, for two different individuals, and the runner-up would become vice-president. So Jefferson’s 73 electors each cast one vote for him, and one vote for his vice-presidential candidate Aaron Burr. This resulted in an electoral tie between Jefferson and Burr, and as a result the Federalist-controlled House of Representatives had to choose between the two men. Jefferson was not popular with the federalists, and they attempted to elect Burr. For a while there was no consensus, with Jefferson a few votes short of being elected. But eventually, former Secretary of the Treasury, Federalist Alexander Hamilton gave his support to Jefferson, thus handing him the presidency, while the Vice-Presidency went to Burr. Mr. Burr apparently didn’t like this very much. A few years later he challenged Hamilton to a duel, which he won handily by killing him. But this is not the scariest aspect of Aaron Burr. After killing the popular Hamilton, he was widely despised throughout the United States. So what did Aaron Burr do? He devised a conspiracy against United States which involved aiding Britain in regaining some of it’s former territories lost in the Revolutionary War. Additionally, he hoped to acquire the land west of the Mississippi to form his own personal empire, which he would use to antagonize the United States. Unfortunately for him, and luckily for the existence of America, Burr was caught and charged with treason. Even though he was acquitted, Burr was hated more than ever and spent the majority of his remaining life in exile. Makes you kind of glad that this man didn’t become president, doesn’t it?
Calhoun is best remembered as a vice-president, but in the early stages of the 1824 election, he was a candidate for the presidency – thereby earning himself a bonus place on this list! Calhoun served as vice-president under two presidents and undermined both of them. Calhoun led the pro-slavery faction in the Senate in the 1830s and 1840s, opposing both abolitionism and attempts to limit the expansion of slavery into the western territories. He was also a major advocate of the Fugitive Slave Law, which enforced the co-operation of free states in returning escaping slaves. Furthermore, Calhoun felt that having a separate, distinct Indian culture within the borders of the United States would create problems in such areas as land usage, interracial relationships, and trade. His beliefs that Indians were inferior steered Calhoun to support a policy of the removal of the Indians in the eastern United States. Many of Calhoun’s policy ideas were implemented during his tenure as Secretary of War and Vice-President. He believed that government interference in the lives of Indians was essential because the Indians were too ignorant and uncivilized to be allowed to make their own decisions and live as they chose. During the Civil War, the Confederate government honored Calhoun on a one-cent postage stamp, which was printed but never officially released.
This article is licensed under the GFDL because it contains quotations from Wikipedia in the bonus item.
Contributor: TonyR


























Love this site!
Ahh, had me thinking we were going to be down for a few days or something, with no new list:) Not complaining though…:)
Oh, nevermind, completely different time zone. I looked at the dates and times, and thought we’d been without lists for two days for some reason (although I remember each list going up. I’m an idiot, I apologize).
As far as candidates who lost, I’d have to say Paris Hilton:) I know it doesn’t follow your recipe for this list, exactly, but she tried, right? Haha
Being in London…I don’t follow the election progress, just what I read from the news. Although I have heard about Paris Hilton lol
As much as I would have enjoyed seeing Paris Hilton in the presidential debates, I think she is too young to run
Perhaps that is a good thing.
Who will be next after this election
I wonder what would happen if she did go for it…haha
I’m rather surprised that George Wallace didn’t make the list.
what about bush…he lost……
… his mind.
I look forward on Nov 5th to add McCain to this list.
There that ought to make half the people mad, and the other half happy.
Nice list! But why only six? Does it means that majority of the worst presidential candidates actually won? I think so.
Haha nur, that would explain most things.
Haha, the head on Calhoun! He looks like he could have been in an old horror movie.
I hope McCain can be added to this list soon.
what? No Ross Peroe?
rtr
I don’t remember learning any of this in school! I do remember about the President/Vice President and in the early days they were usually opposing parties. That must have made for an interesting time in the Government. Its bad enough now (and I am a US Federal Government employee!) with only one party in power.
The last guy looks mean, reminds me of the guy in the movie “house of spirits”
Another great list, although I detect a distinct anti-Southern bias…
@TonyR
You know… just before i saw this list, i was on wikipedia reading about Calhoun…
Henry Wallace was praised, believe it or not, by the Nazis, who ran an article in their journal Spotlight that appeared in Axis countries, that said that “we” meaning the US might double cross Russia if we won the war. This was after he was dumped as Vice President in 1944. The real reason Wallace was dumped is not generally known. Wallace was married to the wife of the Swiss Ambassador to the United States. He told the Swiss Ambassador everything the US was doing, and this was then relayed to the Swiss government, and a Nazi Spy in the Swiss foreign ministry than told the Germans.
The US found out about this from a double agent, who gave information to Allen Dulles in Geneva. Wallace then became a person who could not be trusted, and Roosevelt acquiesced in his dumping. Wallace betrayed the trust of the American government. He could have done the same and given classified information to Stalin.
Wallace realised too late that Stalin was not the good man he portrayed him as when the USSR was a wartime ally.
Well, since the lefty trolls have already injected the current election into this list, I will state that I am looking forward to Obama rightly claiming the No. 1 position on this list in November. And I might add that Dukakis and Kerry are strong contenders as well.
it’ll be a beautiful day when we get to see the community organizer go down in flames. that piece of crap doesn’t deserve to be a team leader at mcdonalds.
Great list!
I am amazed that I never heard the background on Burr while in school. Well, it was a public school, so I guess I should be too surprised. I had heard that Hamilton was killed by a man named Aaron Burr. However, I was never informed of the fact that Burr previously ran for President (and his loss may have instigated the duel), nor that he later was charged with treason for Evil and/or Crazy plans to detroy America outright.
As for those that (possibly prematurely) added McCain to the list, it continues to amaze me how little perspective you have. You may not agree with what he believes, but can’t you think about anyone else? How can you say that someone who has not had to stand the test of time qualifies just because his name has an “R” after it on a ballot? By this logic, couldn’t you put every Republican that ever lost on the list?
*MUCH* too short a list, Tony, but you did extremely well, with what what you had.
I would have added Ross Perot (thanks for the reminder rtr), and Ralph Nader to the list of modern day errors, and would have a host of old names…but you did preface the list with the modifier “Worst” so that does, indeed, narrow the field.
I don’t want to add McCain just cause he has an R after his name, I want to add him because if he’s elected we’ll continue along the road to our downfall that Bush has started us on. If Reagen had lost I wouldn’t ask for his name on the list, cause he was a good candidate. I don’t think Kerry should be added, but Dukakis, eh, maybe. Wasn’t a fan of his.
The McCain comments are not needed. I am not voting for the man, but I still respect him and his service to the country.
It’s hard to do this list without making it all anti-South. Ninety years of slavery followed by about a century of Civil Rights issues is awfully hard to top.
I want to challange someone to a duel. Not with guns, that takes all the fun away. But a duel nonetheless
onwisconsn,
I agree, I don’t know how to label it but I don’t get the people who actually believe somehow we are presently experiencing the worst of everything just because things aren’t great right now. Ignorance? Arrogance? If Mccain loses he won’t ever be considered among the worst presidential candidate by most people. Same for Obama, neither really have radical, wildly unpopular views. It’s stupid it. Also I’ve see other lists where people insist that Bush is the worst president ever. Obviously he really screwed things up but to say that just shows how little people know about history. I’m hoping people are just saying things like that to get a reaction, in which case I’m enabling but if you actually believe that then I suggest you read a history book…..or a least some more listverse.
So I really appreciate lists like this. It really reminds us that even though things are bad, our country has seen and survived much worse.
Sedulous,
I appreciate your comments. I agree that people need to study their history. Afterall, I wonder how many readers realize that Lincoln was not all that popular a candidate, only managing to garner 39.9% of the votes in the 1860 election. I admit that slavery was an explosive issue then, polarizing the populace. If this blog existed then, imagine how many would be saying the same about Lincoln that is being said about McCain and Obama. I am in no way saying McCain or Obama will end up on an edifice or with a memorial if he wins, but it gives a strong argument for an individual’s acts to be forced to stand the test of time before final judgement of the person’s impact or threat of impact on the nation can be ascertained. Sainthood and Halls of Fame generally require a “waiting period” before judgement can be passed, and I thing politicians deserve the same.
wsop2015, as for what McCain might or might not do, I think you must be psychic to judge a man on this, for I have seen no evidence that he will follow closely in Bush’s footsteps. Yes there are pictures of him and video of him either with Bush or praising him, but that is a role of the party. One could say the same about Hillary Clinton and OBama. There are also documented instances of him critizing Bush and his policies. If you watched the Republican primaries at all, you would realize that McCain is an incredibly moderate Republican that was more of a compromise for the majority of the GOP than an outright selection. He has even sponsored bills with some of Bush’s harshest cristics, like Russ Feingold. If you are getting all your news from campaign related links, you should not vote because you are not getting the complete story either way. Educate yourself with as many viewpoints and sources as you can, then make a decision {note: CNN,MSNBC,AP,ABC,NBC,CBS and and news paper in NYC count as one source since they all share the same information).
I also wonder if it is arrogance, ignorance, or a need to stir the pot that precipitates these comments. Whichever, it just shows me specific sender’s cedibility or lack thereof. I will waste no more time commenting on them.
Now all we need is a list of “5 worst presidential candidates who won”.
I can already think of a few I’d add….
Wow, Aaron Burr – what an a**hole!
This list had a lot of info I didn’t know about at all. Wish it was longer though.
LOL no one mentioned Pat Robertson – ran for the Repub ticket against H-dubya in ’88 on an anti-*****ography ticket. Most people know him as the Christian crackpot on the 700 Club, responding to Jerry Falwell’s ridiculous, vitriolic tirade, blaming all of his enemies (“gays, lesbians, ACLU, feminists, liberals”) for 9/11 on September 13th, 2001 with, “Well, I totally agree.”
Great List TonyR. I agree with onwisconsn & Sedulous in that we need history to take a couple of deep breaths before we judge Presidents as the worst or best. I know many are chomping at the bit waiting for a list of worst Presidents that were elected so they can hopefully see Bush in there at the number one spot. I remember when Kennedy was assassinated and everyone was hailing him as one of the greatest Presidents. We even put him on a 50 cent piece. I think the jury is still out on his accomplishments (good and bad) and we are still finding new information on his presidency and he has been out of office for 45 years.
The worst presidents has already been done
http://listverse.com/politics/top-10-worst-us-presidents/
Warrrreagl(18) I’m fairly certain the bias is against candidates who were pro-slavery/pro-segregation, not against the south in general. It just so happened that the most visible candidates of that bent were southerners.
Flock O’Seagulls(21) I don’t think Kerry was so bad (he was just not an eloquent speaker), though I do definitely agree with you regarding Dukakis.
onwisconsn, boy oh boy do I hear ya!
So, does anyone else keep thinking, when it comes to voting in elections (in general) that they find themselves voting for “The lesser of two evils”? Ever wonder where that old phrase came from and why we use it so much today? Reading this list kinda brings on a little perspective…
Oh, please, neither Nader nor Perot nor McCain (hasn’t lost yet, people) compares to these guys. I mean, look at Calhoun. Seriously, look at him, he scares the crap outta me! Aaron Burr was a TRAITOR. And Perot did, what, say funny things in weird voices (I highly recommend checking out Dana Carvey for that: “Can I FINISH?!?!”).
I liked this list. Sure, we could have added more, but sometimes I enjoy a nice, quick list. Well written, too- full of juicy tidbits and nice pieces of history. Good job, TonyR.
Horace Greeley had some crazy hair.
onwisconsn: I couldn’t have said it better myself!! Glad to see some people still know how to think for themselves
)
Dana Carvey on recent events:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=5mavvzmLhlA
ONWISCONSIN–with common sense like that, you should run–alas, it is always voting for the lesser of two evils anymore-
My personal fav? Al Gore, he could have cracked this list.
wasn’t John C. Breckenridge on Friends?
Huey Long…he never officially ran for president, he was shot before he got the chance. But he would have been pretty terrible
VOTE MCCAIN/PALIN! GOD help this country if O’bama wins.
OBAMA/BIDEN IN ’08!
In 2016:
PALIN/JOE THE PLUMBER!
What about Al Gore, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, and soon to be Obama. I can only wish that Obama loses so all my hardworked money doesn’t go to some lazy ***** who doesn’t want to work as hard as me. Any president that wants to re-distribute the wealth is a socialist and will only hurt this great nation. What is the incintive for people to try hard to establish themselves when they get rewarded for be lazy. Huh, answer me this you bunch of liberal *****s.
I like how you spelled it O’bama, lol he’s not Irish…
If Long ever ran, he would be # 1 on this list.
Calhoun………..how scary does he look!
i just learned about Aaron Burr at my school…i’m glad to see him on this list.
I’ll bet “Scientific” would have voted Breckenridge in 1860. *****.
Scientific, I hope you realize that McCain voted yes for the 700billion bailout deal, thus making him a socialist. Good work, dip *****.
At one stage in US history there was a “Democratic-Republican party”? That would simplify matters!
Is it just me, or does # 2 make any one else think of Gore Vidal’s Myra Breckinridge?
And yes, John C. Calhoun’s hair is scary, a whole lot like Elsa Lanchester in Bride of Frankenstein.
What the heck is Calhoun holding above his hands?
interesting list
Ron Paul
Hey, just wanted to say thanks for posting my list and for the positive comments.
As far as George Wallace goes, I was pretty close to putting him in… but I decided that he was just too similar to Strom Thurmond. Same goes for Harry Byrd. I also considered Millard Fillmore, when he ran for a second term on his xenophobic American Party ticket in 1856. But Fillmore had already served as president, and I felt that the list should be exclusively of individuals that had never risen to the office of president – - not people who once served and ran at a later date. Some other individuals to consider might be William Wirt, who in 1832 ran on the sole platform of eliminating the Masons, or Eugene V. Debs, a committed Marxist.
I don’t know if any previous posters here have mentioned it, but let’s not forget the nauseating hypocrisy of Strom Thurmond–whose interracial love child was revealed shortly after his death in ’03. Her mother was apparently a servant in Thurmond’s family home. Republican family values, indeed!
And as for comment #45, Scientific, your vague grumblings regarding liberal *****s, wealth redistribution, and socialism (ah, that favorite knee-jerk response of neoconservative *****heads everywhere), well, they’re just that–vague grumblings with little to support them. Are you even aware that John McCain is–as part of his platform, so it’s well-documented, unlike your statements–endorsing the unprecedented TAXATION of healthcare benefits?
Yes, in a world where every other industrialized, civilized nation considers healthcare a fundamental right of its citizens, the U.S. government would TAX those who are lucky enough to have those benefits (which already excludes nearly 45 million people), as if they were a luxury purchase. But you say you just bought a gas-guzzling Hummer H2? Don’t worry, we’ll just write that off as a business expense.
Why is it that the government can bleed money to megaconglomerates through corporate welfare scams, yet when the smallest pittance goes toward a social program of any sort, the right cries bloody murder? Just why is that? Well, apparently because people of your ilk, Scientific, seem to get all the information they think they need from rightwing blowhards on talk radio and Fox “news.” Your willful ignorance is only overshadowed by your hard-won stupidity. I fear for the future of America, and by extension, the world.
P.J. (57) You go, man. You rock. Perfectly said.
(or girl. I apologize either way.)
David Duke should be on this list. Former Grand Wizard of the KKK – can you imagine?!
(29. onwisconsn)
Great post. I wanted to say something along those lines but you did it better than I could.
America is going through some tough times right now, but we have faced far worse before. If you manage to cut through the party-line bickering being thrown at us from every direction, you will see that both current candidates have some good ideas, as well as a few bad ones. For the first time in my life, I have the option of voting for a candidate I believe in…not simply the lesser of 2 evils.
Obama comes across as sincere and highly intelligent – a nice change of pace from the past 8 years. I love the fact that Obama speaks to us as adults instead of the childish rambling favored by Bush – and to a lesser extent, Bill Clinton. I am a strong supporter of Obama’s plan for health care, and his tax plan seems to be beneficial to more people than McCain’s. On the other hand, Obama apparently has no idea how to lower our national debt as all his proposals will add to the budget, and he has all but gone silent on his plans to end the war with Iraq.
McCain honestly seems to favor transparency in government and appears to put his own beliefs over those of his party. McCain is a very moderate R, which has caused him endless problems with solidifying and energizing his base. The simple fact that he has managed to come so far without becoming a standard right-wing puppet earns him major credit in my book. His 0 tolerance stance on pork and pledge to enforce transparency in government is almost enough to sway me. My main hangups with McCain are his inconsistency (understandable in his situation but still an unfavorable mark)and the fact that he chose Palin as his running mate. I don’t dislike Palin because she is a woman, I despise her because she has all the intelligence of Bush. I do not trust her, and McCain’s age and health have to be considered. There is a higher than average chance that Palin would end up being president for a while, and I do not think she would be able to do the job. I also dislike the fact that McCain’s proposals so far have been aimed more at helping big business over the average American.
With that said, I would gladly support either of these candidates. Since we don’t have that option, I will be voting for Obama simply because his political ideals are a closer match to my own. Even if McCain wins, I still believe our country will be far better off in 4 years than it is now.