Some movie titles are recognizable brands, and will never be re-used. Can you imagine anyone in the future naming a movie Casablanca, Star Wars, or There Will Be Blood? Those names are secure–but, as history shows, if your movie does not become a classic or fan favorite, your title is up for grabs. The following is a list of movies (none of them remakes) that have had their titles recycled for bigger-budget, more high-profile flicks: in some cases with better results; in others, not so much. Make sure you’re ordering the movie you want from Netflix!
Both movies are about, you guessed it, speed–although in very different ways. In the older film, Jimmy Stewart plays a test-car driver who wants to use a carburetor he’s invented in the big Indy 500 race. Along the way you can expect lots of racing scenes, and lots of stock footage! The New York Times called it a “passable program picture,” though there’s no doubt it could’ve been spruced up with a madman telling him if he drops under 55 mph his race car will explode. Boom!
Or, in Spanish, “El Fugitivo.” The 1947 movie has big names behind it–John Ford, Henry Fonda, based on a Graham Greene novel–so it’s a mystery why it’s not better known. While the Harrison Ford film is great, this movie too may be worth a look–Fonda plays a priest on the run from a presumably communist Central American government who wants religion eradicated.
In the 1950 film, John Travolta and Christian Slater are nowhere to be found. Instead, it’s Jimmy Stewart again, this time playing a scout who tries to stop the whites and the Apaches from killing each other. It’s actually fairly progressive for its time, depicting Indians as sympathetic and under attack from whites–consider it a fifties version of Dances With Wolves. Compare that to its 1996 titular successor, which has John Woo fighting and stuff that gets Blowed Up Real Good.
Can you guess what these films are about? The lesser-known 1953 film features Clifton Webb and Barabara Stanwyck not as star-crossed lovers but as a troubled married couple. Rest assured, an iceberg will put their problems into focus. This was a relatively well-received film, even winning an Oscar for Best Screenplay, but it was overshadowed by 1958′s A Night to Remember and the James Cameron film.
Separated by forty years and oh-so-much else. Based on a Max Catto novel, the 1957 flick revolves around hot, sizzling, romance in the hot, sizzling Caribbean. Just to be sure the hotness and sizzling doesn’t go to waste, the ship the lead characters are traveling on catches fire. A big cast helms the film–Rita Hayworth, Robert Mitchum, Jack Lemmon–though the film is pretty blah. I would hazard a guess that it’s leagues above its Steven Seagal successor, about a heroic environmentalist. The “fire down below” there refers to stuff that both Catches on Fire Real Good and Blows Up Real Good.
Sean Penn plays a teen hoodlum named Mick who accidentally kills a Puerto Rican boy–the brother of a gang leader, Esai Morales, who vows revenge. Sent to juvenile prison, Mick awaits his eventual fate. The movie has a fairly good reputation, and reviewers have noted that the young Penn gives a superb performance, perhaps a foreshadowing of his future stellar career. However, the film does falter in its second half. Compare it to the 1995 Michael Bay film–well, it’s Michael Bay. That’s really all you need to say.
Yes, both movies are about tornadoes; the budget of the 1989 film, however, was significantly less than that of its namesake seven years later. The tornado isn’t even in the movie. Directed by Michael Almereyda, the first Twister is about a dysfunctional Kansas family led by cult actor Harry Dean Stanton. Both the comedy and drama are low-key, but many have praised the film as a charming, if strange, sleeper. Perhaps it’s worth checking out–and, as a plus, Bill Paxton is nowhere in sight.
No Russell Crowe or hordes of barbarians in this version. Instead, Cuba Gooding, Jr. and James Marshall are underground boxers. There’s nothing really remarkable about the movie, and it garnered pretty mediocre reviews along with a pittance at the box office.
Both deal with car crashes, though in verrrrry different ways. The 1996 David Cronenberg film (rated NC-17) involves people who have a sexual fetish with car crashes, and stars James Spader and Holly Hunter. It’s probably the best known “first” film on this list, and it garnered a 64% approval rating from the nation’s critics, according to Rotten Tomatoes. But when the Paul Haggis movie came out in 2005, director Cronenberg called the writer/director a “(bleep)hole” for “stealing” his title.
It was tough to think of one more movie for this list, but here we go. Imagine, sometime in a few months, going to Blockbuster to pick out a movie about teen vampires and instead finding out you’ve rented a crime drama starring Paul Newman and Gene Hackman. Multiply this incident by several million and you’ll have our country paralyzed by rioting teenage girls! But seriously, having not seen either of these two identically-named motion pictures, I can’t vouch for either of their merits–though the 1998 film is from the team of Robert Benton and Richard Russo, who brought us the charming dramas Nobody’s Fool and Empire Falls.
Contributor: Peter B-P






























The twister movie was raw, and I still cant get that Cher song out my head from titanic. . .
That’s unfortunate, since it was Celine Dion who sang the song for Titanic soundtrack!
hey nice list!
hey i’m the first to comment. that rocks!
second!
ive never been this close to the top,…. readin the list now
good list I loved it! didnt know any of the older movies.
i’ve heard that new twilight film isn’t that good.
Interesting list. I knew most of these, which sort of surprises me. I think it’s a sign I’ve watched waaaay too many movies this semester.
The Twilight movie wasn’t that bad. Speaking as a fan I enjoyed it. simply because of the book but if were any other movie, I wouldn’t cared much for it much less understand it.
Great list btw.
8th/9th
wow two lists in a row when i’m near the top. This is ridiculous. Nice list. Now i have some old movies to rent
Pacinoed guns on the list, g. Could probably make one about song titles, too.
woahwoahwoah. gamertag, i believe you’re thinking of celine dion? cher… my goodness…
there are actually a few movies with the name ‘titanic’ although i think the others weren’t shown in theaters…
well this is a nice list. ill be sure to check out some of the originally titled films though.
Blown Away is another title with two movies. One has nekked Nicole Eggert and Corey Haim.
There are two “The Girl Next Door” movies; one a comedy about a ***** star and the other a movie about a teenage torture victim
There are two Liar Liar movies only 4 years apart; one is the funny one with Jim Carrey and the other is a made-for-tv film about a gitl who accuses her father of having ***** with her. It’s not that bad really.
What about Employee of the Month 2004/2006, Matt Dillon/Cristina Applegate and Dane Cook/Dax Shephard. Not many have heard of the first one and I think it is much better than the Dane Cook one.
Something that always happens to me is that I will see “Heat” on tv and get all excited. You know, Al Pacino, Robert De Niro, wait…. Burt Reynolds? Dammit!
Hey – is anyone having problems with commenting or has it resolved itself now?
Ha, I’ve seen some of these randomly on channel 5 (UK) during the day and been a bit confused, such as Titantic.
Jfrater: I haven’t been able to come on the site for a few hours, was the server down? Didn’t work at my work either…
can’t I go anywhere without seeing that hideous word “Twilight”? It’s like the Black Plague.
I saw the recent Twilight film and liked it. So, I’ll be careful on the movie that I am going to be buying off of iTunes in a few months. Thanks for the warning!
jfrater: The site was down for most part of the day. I think that’s why there aren’t many comments here.
I love TWILIGHT!!!!
I’m gonna buy it on iTunes too! And dvd!!!
there are two Control movies. Once I wanted to rent the one directed by Anton Corbijn about the life of Ian Curtis from Joy Division but instead I got the another one with Ray Liotta. I noticed the mistake when i got home.
there’s also a couple of ‘Bad Company’s
Twilight – my son described it as “Neighbours – - – with Vampires”
In America that might be “90210 – - – with Vampires”; while in Britain we’re back to “Neighbours” again!
What about deceptively similar titles in films to capitalize on one films success? I remember when “Snakes on a Plane” came out (I know, I know), the movie rental place had about five different movies in the new release section with either “Snakes on a (insert vehicle here)” Or “(“Insert dangerous creature here) on a plane”. I couldn’t believe there were that many people trying to capitalize on *that* movie’s success, but there you go.
Alternatively, a NSFW list could be ***** remakes of famous movies. I know “Saving Ryan’s Privates” is a masterpiece, and I’ve heard of an interesting alternative to “Edward Scissorhands”, but giving you the title would be a give away. Suffice to say, I’m certain scissors have nothing to do with the film…
Was it “SHaving Ryan’s Privates”? I seem to remember reading something about that in passing somewhere sometime. I have also read about the Scissorhands alternative. That’s all I know. Honest.
There was a book released in conjunction with the tv series “Third Rock from the Sun” in which the high commander of the alien mission to earth (played by John Lithgow, named Dick, by the way (his father is the Big Giant Head, which of course makes him Dick Head!)) is under the impression that the ***** versions come first (so to speak!) and that the “real” versions are the alternative (and not as interesting) versions.
THE FAST AND THE FURIOUS is another hollywood blockbuster which took its title from a 1955 film, although the plots are pretty different. just thought i’d throw that thought in here.
i expected to see it on the list but i guess not. good list though.
Twilight is over rated, stick with the book
No offense JFrater but this is a rather pointless and silly list. Slow day I am guessing.
SuperHero3: hey – as long as some people enjoy it, it is never pointless
Did you know that you can’t copyright titles?
every time i hear somebody talk about Twilight i think about this little clip from The Soup. it’s friggin hillarious!
SuperHero3 I disagree. This list is at least a “hmm, no kidding?” spinkled with “that’s interesting”-(how can Hollywood put out fairly major productions only a few years apart with the same title?) and a dash of “huh-huh-huh”-(jfrater done blowed you up real good!)
Oh yes there are so many more. I use to work at a video store way back in the 80′s. Anyone remember Blind Date a silly little comedy with Bruce Willis. so many people rented the slasher film with the same title. Did people not notice the knife weilding maniac on the cover?
interesting read. do people register titles
Then there is “The Patriot”. I made the mistake of reserving a copy at the library thinking it was Mel Gibson’s Revolutionary War epic, but it turned out to be a late career Steven Seagal flop.
Hate when that happens.
i did the same thing spocker but the steven seagal film still made me laugh
I agree with a lot of people on this list about Twilight. I read the books, and the movie just doesn’t live up to it at all, and I read the first book about 9 months ago. All these crazed teenage girls are obsessed with it when it really isn’t that spectacular.
The books are MUCH better.
I don’t think Twilight’s overrated.
It’s just overhyped and all the crazy fangirls(no offense) are obsesses with it. But definitely not overrated. 5/10 is not overrated in my books.
Anyway, I don’t think that entry really counts, because it’s based off a book, so they kinda HAD to keep the title.
Twilight the movie is definitely not a decent movie.
the acting on the part of Bella Swan is failure. read the books multiple times and no where in the first book, is mentioned that she hyperventilates and has an eye twitching problem.
also, parts of the second book “new moon” was thrown into the twilight movie. i was like… wtf?
I was so hoping Gladiator would be on here. I looooooooooove the boxing one, it’s so deliciously cheesy. Yes, Russell Crowe Gladiator is a masterpiece, a classic, all that, but you can’t beat Tommy Reily.
“I don’t think Twilight is over-rated…It’s just overhyped.”
-What?
We’re in the middle of filming a new thriller, “What, No Snappy Original Title?!” It’ll be filled with gut-busting humor, tears-to-your-eyes sentimentality, catestrophic disasters, aching suspense, sheer terror, fantastic imagery, capering tomfoolery, murderous rage, and bunnies that blow up real good!
The Changeling.
Actually, I just remembered a story I overheard my dad telling a friend of his a few years ago. I don’t know if its true or not, but apparently, there was a time where *****o flicks were on sale at video stores along with the more “viewer friendly” movies. And so, there was an incident where families were renting copies of the movie Cinderella only to find out that they had in their hands an X-rated rendition of the classic fairytale.
Again, I don’t know if its true or not. But it’s an amusing story.
What? Video store no longer have the fenced-off "Adults Only" corner?
Awesome list. I only knew about two of those before.
Has anyone ever seen the cool and the crazy? It’s a 1957 film and probably one of the funniest anti-***** propaganda movies i’ve ever seen! Theres one from the nineties with like alicia siverstone and jared leto or something which was a huge flop. but watch the 1957 one if you like that sort of thing… it’s pretty perfect.
When I saw the title of this list, I fully expected employee of the month to be on here…
TWILIGHT!
lol sorry
i just went to see the movie haha
With regards to the original “Fugitive” — if it’s based upon the Graham Greene work “The Power and the Glory”, then it’s set in Mexico and the government isn’t Communist. Rather, it’s set during Mexico’s Cristero War, a civil war which was provoked, depending upon your point of view, by the assassination of a democratically-elected president at the behest of a Catholic Church opposed to plans to install modern capitalism and the separation of church and state, or else by an explicitly atheist president’s attempt to destroy the Catholic Church by outlawing monasteries and nunneries, limiting the Church’s right to own property, prohibiting priests from wearing clerical garb outside of church, requiring priests to register with the state, and setting artificially low maximum quotas on priests. (Personally, I believe both sides were correct. Messy, messy, situation with no clear good guys or bad guys.)
Here’s another duplicate title…
“CROSSROADS”
…the first being the 1986 movie with Ralph Maccio as a young blues-guitarist….great movie, especially the guitar duel (for his soul) against Steve Vai near the end….
….then the duplicate title….a useless, campy, teenie-bopper flick starring…(groan…)..the talentless Brittany Spears BAAAAARRRRRFFFFFFFF…..!
This title is one you REALLY have to be sure you’re getting the right one….
Didn’t see this one one the comments yet…
Mr & Mrs. Smith
1st one was a very rare Hitch*****comedy with Carole Lombard and Robert Montgomery from 1941
2nd the infamous Brad Pitt/Angelina Jolie flick from 2005.
NO
i HATE twilight…
kicking and screaming
This one might be a bit of a cheat. Fatal Attraction. There’s the 1987 Michael Douglas, Glenn Close film and then there is this 1980 clunker, http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080851/ that is called “Head-On” in some places, but I’ve only ever seen it (in video stores)under the title Fatal Attraction.
Interesting side note, there are no less than 6 films titled Head On.
I was hoping to find reference to this title ("Fatal Attraction").
I think the 1985 Canadian Release "Fatal Attraction" was
far superior to the Hollywood release, two years later.
Foreign "Art House" films vs. Hollywood drivel? Never a question!
Besides, any film with Sally Kellerman (THE original "Hot Lips"
from M*A*S*H) will always be on my Favorites List.
My daughter recommended Crash to me, (she saw the second one), and I watched the first one and was horrified! It’s sort of kinky and graphic and I was imagining her watching it with her boyfriend. LOL!
They forgot the movies bodygaurd