[WARNING: contains adult material which is not safe for work.] Sex has been called many things: Immoral, a gift from God, illegal, natural, fun, exciting, and a bonding experience. It has even been called strange. These 10 acts, however, are MORE than strange: They’re bizarre! So now, I present to you, the 10 most bizarre sex practices. This list contains really unnerving text, and some swearing! The only way this could EVER be work-safe, is if you work at a side-show in a circus! The items on this list are in no particular order.
Agalmatophilia is a paraphilia concerned with the sexual attraction to a statue, doll, mannequin or other similar figurative object. The attraction may include the desire for actual sexual contact with the objects, a fantasy of having sexual (or non-sexual) encounters with the animate or inanimate instances of the preferred objects, the act of watching encounters between the objects themselves, or sexual pleasure gained from thoughts of being transformed or transforming another into the preferred object. Agalmatophilia may also encompass Pygmalionism which describes a state of love for an object of one’s own creation.
Nyotaimori (female body presentation), often referred to as “body sushi,” is the practice of eating sashimi or sushi from the body of a woman, typically naked. Nantaimori refers to the same practice using a male model. This sexual fetish is a subdivision of food play. As a result of being served on a human body, the temperature of the sushi or sashimi comes closer to body temperature. Before becoming a living sushi platter, the person is trained to lie down for hours without moving. She or he must also be able to withstand the prolonged exposure to the cold food. Body hair, including pubic hair, would also be shaved, as a display of pubic hair may be seen as a sexual act. Before service, the individual would take a bath using a special fragrance-free soap and then finish off with a splash of cold water to cool the body down somewhat for the sushi.
Ponyplay is a form of bondage that involves a “pony” and a rider. The pony is often outfitted with straps, a leather saddle, blinders, reins, and a bit in the mouth. The rider, sometimes utilizing either a riding crop or a whip, either gets pulled in a cart or rides the pony directly. The principal theme of animal roleplay is usually the voluntary or involuntary reduction (or transformation) of a human being to animal status, and focus on the altered mind-space created. The most common examples are probably canids (pup, dog, wolf), felines (cat, kitten, lion) or equines (pony, horse).
These fantasies are obviously pretty explanatory. On the Deviant Desires website (based on the book of the same name), Katharine Gates explains that some people actually bring these fantasies to life in consensual role-playing! One of her friends, “…painted the woman’s nude body with dotted lines to represent cuts of meat.” One very tasteful website, Muki’s Kitchen, features photographs of female models trussed up in pans filled with vegetables, and stuffed with apples and carrots in every possible orifice. Thus, erotic feeding, messy fun, bondage, gags and vaginal or anal penetration may be incorporated into this practice.
Unlike real necrophilia, this is actually legal (not that that’s a good thing)! It’s quite simple, actually: One partner remains quiet (…something we all wish we could have…) and still, while the other has sex with him/her. For added realism, the “pseudo-dead” partner can lay in cold water for a while before the act! This particular practice met some notoriety, thanks to its appearance in the show, “Law and Order: Special Victims Unit”.
Salirophilia is a sexual fetish or paraphilia that involves deriving erotic pleasure from soiling or disheveling the object of one’s desire, usually an attractive person. It may involve tearing or damaging their clothing, covering them in mud or filth, or messing their hair or makeup. The fetish does not involve harming or injuring the subject, only their appearance. The fetish sometimes manifests itself in the defacing of statues or pictures of attractive people, especially celebrities. The fetishist finds this sexually exciting, rather than mere vandalism. They sometimes form collections of defaced art for future enjoyment. [Image Source]
Mummification as a BDSM bondage practice involves restraining a living person’s body in a non-damaging way by wrapping it head to toe, or neck to toe, in materials like saran wrap, clingfilm, cloth, bandages, rubber strips, duct tape, plaster bandages, bodybags, or straitjackets. The end result is a person completely immobilized and looking like an Egyptian mummy. They may then either be left bound in a state of effective sensory deprivation for a period of time, or sensually stimulated in their state of bondage, before being released from their wrappings.
Autopederasty is the near-impossible act of sticking one’s own fully-erect penis in one’s own rectum. Yes. Only a small percentage of people can do it, but it’s possible! There is a porno called “Go Fuck Yourself” that is devoted to the act, even going so far as to instruct people on how to do it! NOTE: There are two other, more familiar variants: Autofellatio is when a man gives himself oral sex; Then, there is Autocunnilingus, where a woman gives herself oral sex.
Talk about blowing chunks! Obviously, the words “erotic” and “vomiting” are not often used together. However, they do have similarities: Both trigger the release of hormones that make you feel better; both are caused by stimulus; and, for men at least, both involving having fluids get forced through a tube and out of an orifice. The primary dissimilarity is that most people do not associate throwing-up with a pleasurable experience. Dr. Robert J. Stoller, a renowned sexologist and psychiatrist, begs to differ; Here he discusses the cases of three women: The first woman doesn’t do the Technicolor-yawn herself, instead, “…I can reach a sure orgasm by imagining someone vomiting in a hard, humiliating fashion…”; The second woman actually experiences an orgasm every time she throws up; The third and final woman describes it like this: “…Vomiting for me is like…an orgasm in that I’m tensed, I feel the…intense flood of good feelings almost continually throughout the vomiting and experience relief and quiet warmth in my body when I’m finished. It is not identical to an orgasm. I do not feel it intensely in my genitals alone, but I do feel it there as well as the rest of my body and…in my mouth…”. NOTE: There is also a practice known as “Roman-showers”, which is to become aroused by being vomited upon.
Okay – this has been on listverse before, but it really does deserve to be here as well. Teratophilia is the sexual attraction to deformed or monstrous people. One version of Teratophilia is acrotomophilia, sexual attraction to amputees. Considerable commercial and amateur erotica is published apparently targeting people with such a sexual attraction. Persons attracted to amputees in particular are said to be engaging in amputee fetishism.
This article is licensed under the GFDL because it contains quotations from Wikipedia.
Maybe I’m weird, but I’m not aroused by any of the items on the list. I’m not saying my own ***** life is plain vanilla, but it doesn’t come close to this weirdness (yes, I know I’m making a value judgement, but I’m comparing *my* values to the values of those who would engage in the above practices, so I feel free to judge).
I’m really glad that it doesn’t take some weird thing to get me off…
I am….SO HOT RIGHT NOW!!!
(not really)
I loved this list, but what about Objectum *****uals? People that fall in love with inanimate objects. There’s a FASCINATING documentary called Strange Love: Married to the Eiffel Tower, which follows a few women. One is married to the eiffel tower, another has a bow and arrow as a lover, Two people have the berlin wall as a lover. The docu even features consummation of the marriage… Now if that doesn’t hook you, I don’t know what will.
It was online somewhere, you might have to look around a bit.
I wonder what the guy in #3 will think when he sees his own picture.
“Look, I’m on the internet……oh…”
The girl on the couch isn’t that bad looking…
the girl in the mummification picture was hot…
Although this is an interesting list, the term PARAPHILIA has not been clearly defined. This DISORDER causes distress and impairment in social and occupational functioning. This is NOT THE SAME as normal adult *****ual behaviors that involve things such as ***** play and *****ual fantasies.
Moreover, in order to have one of these disorders, this has to be a person’s PRIMARY SOURCE for *****ual arousal.
Another episode of strangelove featured a man with a love for cars, specifically ‘sodomizing’ them in the exhaust! He even screwed the helicopter Airwolf when in a bizarre coincidence he got the opportunity to do so without being caught!
I think the “weirdest” *****ual practice I’ve ever heard about was this lady who could only have an orgasm when she swallowed Barbie doll heads…
I think this list here is pretty tame. I don’t think anyone should limit their *****uality, as long as all parties consent.
Also, I love the internet with all my heart because it gives me my precious *****.
Well Mandie-we all know that’s what the internet is for!
Are we still calling disabled people “monstrous”? Having an amputation doesn’t make you a monster. Also, this list seems to imply that only fetishists are attracted to people with an amputation, which, believe me, is not the case.
Sally: “monstrosity – freak: a person or animal that is markedly unusual or deformed”
“grotesque: distorted and unnatural in shape or size”
It does appear to be a valid definition for a person who is distorted or unnatural in shape or size.
Hahaha, Uh. wow. I liked the picture for Autopederasty… it was spot-on.
tgilbert: What’s Strangelove? I know of the movie with a similar name…
73. jfrater : Likewise I could call a mentally impaired person a retard. Just because you can, doesn’t mean you have to…
the sushi thing looks cool actually. maybe im wierd
Mark: “retard” when used as a noun is offensive – it has never been otherwise. On the other hand, “monstrous” has a non-offensive history. Having said that, there is nothing wrong with saying a person is retarded. I am sure you can see the difference
Odium: I don’t think ALL ***** is misogynistic, and this is coming from a girl who wrote a paper on the evils of Pete Hamill’s “Forever”. I think the vast majority of mainstream ***** objectifies both genders.
41. joanne
That really scares me. Are you serious or just playing games on the “anonymous” internet?
@ 64 Kitsey; I second that, that documentary was amazing. I had never quite envisioned anyone having sx with the Eiffel Tower before. She was all whispery and groany about it too – it really challenged me not to immediately attach the ‘FREAK’ label.
77. jfrater
“Having said that, there is nothing wrong with saying a person is retarded.”
I usually agree with you, but I am sure that most amputees would not consider themselves “monstrous”. I think what Mark was reacting to was the connotation that ANY amputee was monstrous. It is a shame that some view this unfortunate occurrence as a fetish, but that does make the “victim” of this fetish monstrous.
77. jfrater : I agree that the history and origin of words and language is important. But I think what’s even more important when we consider word usage is what they mean now, in the present. Sure, monstrous didn’t always have a negative connotation, but it does now and could definitely be extremely offensive in this context.
Look at it pragmatically is my point, I think that someone missing a limb or limbs has more than enough to worry about without being referred to with a word that has such negative connonations.
And yes, there are serious problems with calling the mentally impaired retarded. My old primary school used to have the only Special Education Unit in Emerald. Going to school with these kids, you really notice what words can do. Take my word here, retard can be very, very hurtful and is almost exclusively used hatefully. The negative connotation mixed with the animosity can destroy someone with ease.
Just refreshed my view and read Mark”s comment. I think he said it better then I did.
Hey Mark,
I have read a lot of your postings on this site, and I think you have a lot to contribute to everything that is. Your earlier posts showed a lot of indecision and angst. You hold yourself well in debating and discussing issues on this site. Enjoy reading your posts, but despite the things that happened in the past there is always the future to look forward to. Keep that positive outlook I have seen from you recently and you will go far.
Emerald is a nice place. That is, if you are talking about outer east Melb.
I think if you are pointing out someone’s unfortunate, limited mental capacity they will be offended anyhow. But i guess saying ‘you have severe mental retardation’ doesn’t roll off the tongue quite as well as continually shouting ‘retard retard retard’, which i don’t doubt could break someone ‘with ease’.
As for the list, some of the things are strange but not really sickening. I saw a documentary a while back about a Japanese bloke who had 20-30 life size dolls. The dolls were ridiculously expensive and he stated that ‘he does not like to have favourites and he likes to ‘service’ all of them on regular intervals’. Then he went out with his gigantic DLSR to the park with a doll and dress her up and then talk about if she liked the dress or not. Very very odd.
I, (did), consider myself quite desensitised but my trip to Japan showed me otherwise. I don’t mean to take it too far but has anyone heard of enema *****? Or enemas being displayed as a *****ual act? That DVD had me wincing in disgust.
Mark: Perhaps it is just New Zealand, but over here it was the norm here to refer to mentally handicapped people as “mentally retarded” – which means held back of course. We can change that to “handicapped” until that picks up negative connotations – then change it again, then change it again, but this only serves to help those who wish to be politically correct. The term itself is accurate – it is a reference to held back development. To call someone a “retard” is an insult – but to say he is “mentally retarded” is not.
As an addendum to my previous comment, here is the Wikipedia article on Mental Retardation which is very interesting and looks at the term itself as well as some of the terms it replaced (replaced because people thought them insulting – which is what is now happening to the term retardation).
Oh – and one more – in the UK “spastic” was used to refer to people with cerebral palsy – it became an insult due to children using it against each other so it fell out of use. Now read this bit of text:
“The Spastics Society changed its name to Scope in 1994. The words then gradually dropped out of common usage as the majority of British society came to regard them as offensive and politically incorrect. (Since then, the terms “Scope”, “Scoper” or “Scopie” have been used as insults.)”
It has taken only 10 years for the new politically correct term to also become an insult. In another 10 years Scope will need to change its name again. And again in 10 years.
Is it not possible for us to realize that children will use these terms as an insult but stop as adults (well most stop as adults). I don’t know any adults that would use these terms intending to hurt or offend someone.
85. shadow : Cheers, good to know that someone here appreciates me
86. Carl : Funny story actually, I went to Lindeman Island with my family in January. Whilst there we met many, many people from Sydney, Adelaide and Melbourne. They all asked us where we were from, “Emerald” we would reply. Right then we could tell which major city they were from. The Sydneysiders would ask “Where’s that?”, the Adelaidites would ask “Where’s that?” with the signature twang. And then of course, the Melbournites would say “Oh, you mean in Eastern Melbourne?”.
As a matter of fact the Emerald in which I reside is a lot less notable -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emerald,_Queensland
Meh. I’m kinda surprised that ponyplay and mummification are on here. They certainly aren’t on par with the others, which are way more extreme. Ponyplay, or animalplay in general, is becoming all too common.
87/88/89. jfrater : They’re all very good points. But at the end of the day, ***** means *****, so the terminology is correct, but that doesn’t make it a good – or even acceptable – choice in some contexts. Political correctness is important, their aren’t certain people who want it and certain types that don’t. I myself thing that arbitrariness is arguably the ugliest scar on humanities hideous nature, yet I still think that political correctness is a necessity.
I was aware of the fact that the word spastic has been “dropped” so to speak, from the politically correct persons vocabulary – that doesn’t stop me when I’m with my mates however. But the Wiki article is interesting.
I see your point about us constantly changing our vocabulary, but the effort to exclude a word from your speech or type is nothing compared to what it could do to someone offended by it. I realise that people can be offended by words that we would be use everyday and probably consider quite politically correct and “safe” to use in public. However, the vast amount of people that would take offence to the noun retard may be enough to consider at least a decrease in its usage.
The only reason we’re debating at all is because we have slightly different views. Just be happy you aren’t in my English class. My teacher’s brother has Aspberger’s Syndrome and she is very, very touchy. She’ll give you the look of death for so much as saying retard, retarded, spastic etc. Not fun at all, seeing as I can’t help myself sometimes
74. illegal immigrant. Strangelove is a channel 4 documentary. I think there were only the two episodes made unless I’m mistaken (the woman who married the eiffel tower and the man who loved cars).
I watched something about the horse thing on *****cetera…
The shoes they wear that are made like hooves look painful.
It was quite funny to watch women with tails and saddles pulling a man on a carriage…
Ah well… to each their own
oochan (28) Becca (29)
Sure, WE believe you!!
flaminio (60)
Odd, she screams, moans and moves plenty for me
Cheers
Lee
about the deformed/monstrous discussion, the description states “Teratophilia is the *****ual attraction to deformed or monstrous people”. It doesn’t say deformed people ARE monstrous, just that teratophiliacs can be attracted to deformed OR monstrous people. At least, that’s how I interpreted it…
Mark: I knew there was an Emerald up north somewhere but i just took a punt you were Victorian. It seems your Emerald is very, very different to Victoria’s Emerald.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emerald,_Victoria
97. Carl : Don’t worry, I’m not growing up with an Emerald education, I go to school in Rockhampton -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockhampton,_Queensland
It’s a fair bit bigger, and the Grammar School is quite impressive. It’s all very different to Victoria up here, not in the least the absence of the bloody, freezing cold
95. k1w1taxi: hahaha! You figured it out, eh?
96. chubbmeister: Well, the point is, there aren’t ANY humans who we should refer to as “monstrous”. Calling people “monstrous” due to the way they look or the way their bodies work is cruel.
“not that that’s a good thing”?
I like a little unnecessary, callous judgment in my lists, dunno about y’all.
@100. sally, yeah, I stand corrected. It’s funny how I missed the big picture by looking at the small words
100. Sally : Jumping the fence for a second here, it’s not always cruel. It depends on the person.
No.3 O_o
@ Kate: Most studies have come to the conclusion that the male performer is only objectified, insofar as he is suitably depersonalised so as to become a stand-in for the viewer. And, personally, I don’t believe *****ography would be nearly as objectionable if the vast majority of the *****ual acts that take place in it were not pseudo-rape in the first place. There’s a reason the Marquis de Sade wrote his works in prison.
Disgusting!
“I don’t believe *****ography would be nearly as objectionable if the vast majority of the *****ual acts that take place in it were not pseudo-rape in the first place.”
Odium
I’m guessing you don’t see many mainstream ***** movies and I’d be hard pressed to name one that I would call psuedo-rape. Yes sadly ***** is mainstream. It needs to go back to being a sleazy little secret. It’s more fun that way.
Odium, as long as it’s not *real* rape, where is the bad in it? Who cares what other people get off on, as long as no one else is actually getting hurt in the process? So I like a little play-rape every once in awhile, it’s perfectly consentual and safe, and I see no reason why ***** should censor that particular fantasy just because the *real* thing is so bad.
Heather, “as long as it’s not *real* rape, where is the bad in it?”
****
Try reading some Lonnie Athens PhD Socio-anthropology, Criminology.
I used to think like you, as if the fantasy was just the fantasy and didn’t touch the outside world.
I don’t believe that any longer, with good reason.
I’m not saying that Athens alone changed my mind, but he gave me sufficient doubt that I explored the subject with various authors over a span of time. It behooves anyone who desires to watch, or engage in, some of the “play rape” or other “play violent ***** acts” to know more about what you might be in for.
Just a friendly warning, but with genuine concern.
actually i think number 9 4 and 5 would be ok
Ponyplay: Some people will do anything for a bit of ass!
111. astraya, some people *are* a piece of ass!
Anyone seen the documentary Love Me, Love My Doll?
Watch it. Sad/interesting/funny.
i cant really believe that some ppl actually get turned on by others vomiting on them talk about tastes…. yuck i would go along with some fetishes but these ones here are simply out of discussion 4 me totally turn offs
Im practice Ponyplay =$
What?!?! How are any of these bizarre?? I do almost every single one. lol
Yea maybe the Nayotaimori…the rest-way too much idle time…and people-take your meds!
It is someone’s fetish. No exceptions..
I think #1, Teratophilia, is actually very sweet. I’m glad to know it exists. If I were an amputee or deformed in some other way I’d be very glad to know that people exist who find me *****ually attractive. It’s sad that most of the world thinks that it’s *****ually deviant to be attracted to an amputee.
@daisytrench (119): If I were an amputee or deformed in some other way I’d be very glad to know that people exist who find me *****ually attractive.
So you’d think it is ok to be used? That’s the gist behind this item: it isn’t *you* (as a person) that the fetishist is attracted to.