Photo lists are my favorite to read and write about, so I’m always trying to think of new subject matter for a photo list that would complement the others on the site. Recently my brother discovered some old pictures of our grandfather. We never knew they existed, and it gave me the idea for this list. This list looks at some rare and hopefully interesting photographs that were uncovered in recent years along with descriptions of the photos and how they were discovered.
Taken: 1925
Discovered: 2005
In 2005 the Smithsonian Institution announced that it had some never-before published pictures of the Scopes Monkey Trial which was dubbed “The Trial of the Century,” The negatives were discovered after looking through archival material donated to the Smithsonian back in 1971. The photo shows William Jennings Bryan (seated at left) fielding questions from Clarence Darrow. The heat that summer in east Tennessee was the worst in memory, so the judge moved the trial outside the County courthouse to a cooler venue and to accommodate the enormous crowds. The proceedings were held on a platform that had been erected in front of the Rhea County Courthouse for the benefit of ministers who wanted to preach during the time of the trial.
Interesting Fact: One explanation of why this picture was never published at the time is that the trial ended the next day, and Scopes was found guilty. When Bryan died five days later, the image’s immediate news value diminished.
Taken: 1858
Discovered: 2006
Florence Nightingale is one of nursing’s most important figures. She gained worldwide attention for her work as a nurse during the Crimean War. She was dubbed “The Lady with the Lamp” after her habit of making rounds at night to tend to injured soldiers. Early photographs of Florence Nightingale are very rare because she was extremely reluctant to be photographed, partly for religious reasons and also because she regarded any personal publicity as detrimental to the causes of public health. The photo was discovered in an album of mid 19th century photographs and shows Florence sitting reading outside her family home in Embley Park, Hampshire two years after her return from the war.
Interesting Fact: Another photo of Florence Nightingale surfaced just last year. The photo was taken in 1910 ( 52 years after the one above) It’s the last photograph taken of her and shows 90 year old Florence in her bedroom at her home in South Street, London near Hyde Park. The photo was taken by Lizzie Caswall Smith, a noted studio photographer in the early 1900s who specialized in celebrity and society studio portraits. On the back of the photo Caswall Smith wrote, “Taken just before she died, house near Park Lane. The only photograph I ever took out of studio. I shall never forget the experience.” You can see the photo here.
Taken around: 1900
Discovered: 2008
I realize that a recently discovered photo of a tortoise named Jonathan is not very exciting. However, when the photo shown above was found, it backed up the claim that Jonathan is the oldest living animal on earth. Jonathan was brought to the small island of St Helena in the South Atlantic Ocean in 1882 along with three other tortoises when they were 50 years old. The photograph above was taken around 1900 and was recently discovered as part of a collection of Boer War images. It shows Jonathan, eating some grass with a Boer War prisoner and guard next to him. Jonathan was about 70 years old when this picture was taken which makes Jonathan approximately 177 years old. I know many will ask (like me) how they know for sure that Jonathan was already 50 years old when he came to the island. Others may ask how they are sure that the photo of the tortoise is really Jonathan. The truth is, I’m not sure. I found this information from several different sources so I decided to give good ol’ Jonathan the benefit of the doubt.
Interesting Fact: Locals say that despite Jonathan’s age, he still has the energy to regularly mate with the three younger females. Jonathan is owned by the St Helena government and lives in a specially built plantation on the governor’s land and is treated like a celebrity due to his legendary status. You can see a recent picture of Jonathan here.
Taken: 1865
Discovered: 2008
The Library of Congress recently discovered three new glass negatives of President Abraham Lincoln’s second inauguration. The photo above was originally mislabeled as President Grant’s inauguration ceremony. A curator discovered the photographs while reviewing a log book noticed the caption “Lincoln” in the margins. After careful comparison between the only known photos of the inauguration (just two existed) it was concluded that this photo is actually a crowd scene at Lincoln’s second inauguration. The glass stereograph above shows crowds of people attending the special event including African-American troops marching in an inauguration for the first time.
Interesting Fact: American History buffs get very excited when a new Lincoln photo surfaces. There are two recently discovered photographs of Lincoln but they have not been officially verified. This Photo was discovered this year in a personal album of President Ulysses S. Grant and apparently shows Lincoln in front of the White House. Another photograph discovered a couple of years ago might be a photo of Lincoln at Gettysburg possibly arriving at the stage on horseback. You can see every picture ever taken of Lincoln including the two questionable ones mentioned above here.
Taken: 1969
Discovered: 2009
This image was just recently published and is from a film camera that was mounted on the Apollo 11 lunar lander. I know technically this might not be considered a photograph but it’s very rare to see an astronaut’s face on the moon except in sci-fi movies so I wanted to include it in the list. The image was discovered while viewing NASA films. As Armstrong raised his gold reflexive visor (which normally obscures the astronaut’s face), his face appears just for a split second on the film. The footage was transferred into high definition format and then a single frame was made into the image above.
Interesting Fact: Because Armstrong was the guy with the camera most of the iconic pictures are of Aldrin and very few of Armstrong. This year on the 40th anniversary of the first moon landing Armstrong was presented this picture. Despite his modesty Armstrong was impressed to receive the print of himself as a souvenir.
Taken: 1848
Discovered: 2008
After a tremendous amount of research it was established that this daguerreotype photo is one of the earliest photographs of New York City. It was discovered at a small New England auction but the significance of the photograph was not known. The photo was taken around 1848 and shows a hilltop house with a lawn surrounded by a picket fence. It also shows a blurred horse-drawn carriage in the foreground. The area is now Manhattan’s Upper West Side. The photo was sold at auction this year and this time it fetched $62,500.
Interesting Fact: One of the main factors in determining the legitimacy of this photo is a note that was found in the plate’s original leather case which describes a road near the house. The note reads as follows: “This view was taken at too great a distance, & from ground 60 or 70 feet lower than the building; rendering the lower Story of the House, & the front Portico entirely invisible. (the handsomest part of the House.) The main road, passes between the two Post & rail fences. (called, a continuation of Broadway 60 feet wide.) It requires a maganifying [sic] glass, to clearly distinguish the Evergreens, within the circular enclosure, taken the last of October, when nearly half of the leaves were off the trees. May 1849. L. B.”
Taken: 1909
Discovered: 2009
This recent find could be the only color photograph of King Edward VII. The photograph shows the King in Highland costume enjoying the autumn grouse season in Scotland. The picture is an early color photography process called autochrome, patented in France in 1903. It remained the principal color photo process until the advent of color film during the mid 1930s. The photo was taken by banker Lionel de Rothschild in 1909. The autochromes were forgotten in a cupboard in Exbury House until they were discovered by de Rothschild’s grandson wrapped in old newspapers. Edward died eight months after the photo was taken.
Interesting Fact: The picture was found alongside 700 other images from the early 1900s, including this one which is probably the first color photograph of London Zoo, taken in 1910.
Taken: 1888
Discovered: 2008
This is the most publicized photograph on the list so many will be familiar with it. The photo was discovered while combing through a large family photo collection that was donated by a New England Historic Genealogical Society member. The man that donated the photograph is not sure which family member actually took the photo. He said, “I never thought much about it,” and added, “It just seemed like something no one would find very interesting.” The photo was taken in Brewster, Cape Cod, Massachusetts and shows eight-year-old Helen Keller hand in hand with her teacher Anne Sullivan. Both Keller and Sullivan indicated later in their journals that “doll” was the first word Helen Keller learned in sign language in March 1887. This photograph was taken about sixteen months later and is believed to be the only known photograph of Helen Keller holding one of her dolls.
Interesting Fact: You can watch a very interesting video here filmed 42 years after this photo was taken. It shows Anne Sullivan and Helen Keller demonstrating how Helen learned to talk and understand speech.
Taken: 1939
Discovered: 2008
In Anne Frank’s Diary Anne called Peter Schiff her “one true love.” In 1940 at the age of 11 she writes ‘Peter was the ideal boy: tall, slim and good-looking, with a serious, quiet and intelligent face. He had dark hair, beautiful brown eyes, ruddy cheeks and a nicely pointed nose. I was crazy about his smile, which made him look so boyish and mischievous.’ For more than 60 years there were no photographs known of Anne Frank’s childhood sweetheart. The photo above was discovered when a childhood friend, Ernest Michaelis, now 82, came to realize that the childhood friend that gave him this photograph (before Michaelis had left Germany for Britain) was the 13-year-old boy Anne Frank wrote about in her diary.
Interesting Fact: Peter Schiff does not reappear in the diary until January 6, 1944, after Anne had been in hiding for more than one and a half years. After she has a dream about Peter she writes ‘At that point I woke up, still feeling his cheek against mine and his brown eyes staring deep into my heart, so deep that he could read how much I’d loved him and how much I still do, and now Peter, my dearest Peter. I’ve never had such a clear mental image of him. I don’t need a photograph, I can see him oh so well.’ The photo of Peter Schiff along with a note that reads ‘A friendly memento of your friend Lutz Peter Schiff’ was donated to the Anne Frank museum by Ernst Michaelis. Like Anne Frank’s family, Peter’s family fled Germany for the Netherlands and died in Auschwitz or Bergen-Belsen.
Taken: Around 1850
Discovered: 2009
Phineas Gage was a railroad construction worker from New Hampshire and is known for his incredible survival after an explosives accident in 1848. The explosion propelled an iron rod (shown being held above) traveling at high speed to enter the side of Gage’s face, pass behind his left eye, and then exit at the top of his skull. The iron rod was recovered some 30 yards away, smeared with blood and brain. Gage recovered from the accident and retained full possession of his reason, but his wife and other people close to him soon began to notice dramatic changes in his personality. This is possibly the first recorded case suggesting that damage to specific regions of the brain might affect personality and behavior. The photo above was discovered in July 2009 and is the only known picture of Gage that exists. It was first thought to be a picture of a whaler with a harpoon and was posted on flickr under daguerreotype photographs. After seeing the picture, members of whaling groups commented that what the man was holding was not a harpoon. Another commenter then suggested that it could be a picture of Phineas Gage. When the photograph was compared to his life mask it was confirmed to be Gage around the age of 25. Gage died 11 years after the accident from a series of increasingly violent convulsions.
Interesting Fact: Phineas Gage’s brain was not subjected to any medical examination at that time, but seven years later his body was exhumed so his skull could be studied. Today Gage’s skull is on permanent display at Harvard’s Countway Library of Medicine. You can see a picture of Phineas Gage’s skull and life mask here.






























I still can’t get my head around to the fact that photographs existed in the 1800′s. Anne Frank’s love interest is pretty cute. I’d go for him were I 11 years old.
Great list!
People used to look so much cooler than we do now. I blame synthetic fabrics
Great list Blogball – always look forward to seeing your name at the top of the page!
good list. but i don’t see any horse drawn carriage in #5.
@51 MM: Actually that video wasn’t recently discovered. I visited the Anne Frank Huis several years ago and I remember seeing it…
I’m kind of glad that Peter was included here. I’m Dutch and Anne Frank’s diary was the first serious book (as in: book with a serious theme and meant for teens more than kids) I read and it made me cry so hard. I’ve always been interested in WWII, especially local (well, The Netherlands in this case) so seeing that picture kind of cheered me up in a weird way.
The other photos are cool, too. Florence Nightingale looks lovely. And it’s really amazing how the photo of the lion in London Zoo looks so recent!
Thanks for the correction, IrigD; I just saw it recently and I thought I’d read that it was newly discovered.
Phineas Gage! I hoped he’d be on here! That’s one tough joker, lemme tell ya! Lucky as hell. The accounts on Wikipedia are just astonishing. He leans over to vomit and half a teacup of brain matter falls out of his head.
Best list that I’ve seen on here in a long time.
I just recently saw the Phineas Gage photograph, but I didn’t realize it was only discovered this year!
This is the kind of list I love seeing on this site. Nice details about the photos. Well done!
WoW!!! Love this stuff! Firsts, finds, mysteries… love ‘em all! Another great credit Blogball! And to JF for having the wisdom and foresight to post it!
“Locals say that despite Jonathan’s age, he still has the energy to regularly mate with the three younger females”
What- are the females 147, 142 and 139 years of age? Way to hustle the young ‘uns, Jonny boy!
Fascinating list! Great finds, blogball. =)
Blogball – always with the greats lists!
Phineas Gage is HOT!
Thank you for the nice comments listversers! I really appreciate it and it makes the effort well worth it. I always enjoy researching anything involved with photographs so this was great fun for me to learn all about the details of these rare photos.
Thank you for posting the list Jamie. I just gave the Ultimate Book of Top 10 Lists book its first review on Amazon.
Great List,
The picture collections are my favorite as well.
AHH, #1 was so frightening to see. After learning about him so much in Psychology classes it is interesting to see his face.
Some clarifications re Phineas Gage: (1) His wife might or might not have noticed his personality changes, but first he would need to *have* a wife, which he almost certainly did not. (2) No one knows what his age was when this photo was taken, but he was certainly older than 25. (3) The photo is from the collection of Jack and Beverly Wilgus. Read their story at http://www.brightbytes.com/phineasgage/index.html and more about Gage himself at
@Blogball (73):
I was wondering if that was the same Blogball on Amazon.
um, I meant to say… Read more about Gage himself at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phineas_Gage
I forgot in my last comment to thank my sister who bravely agreed to proof read the list and correct my usual punctuation (and other mistakes) and hopefully made it easier on the Listverse administrators this time.
@Matthew L Lena (Boston) (76):
Thanks for that info and link. I ran across several different articles on Gage (He is a very popular guy) and some did mention he had a wife. http://neurophilosophy.wordpress.com/2006/12/04/the-incredible-case-of-phineas-gage/ Most information I came across listed his age at 25 when the accident happened and many think the photo was taken a couple of years later putting him at 26 or 27 in the picture. But you might be right because your article is more recent than mine. I guess it all depends on what article you read and that’s what makes these old photos so much fun.
Great list, Blogball! Very interesting.
Is it just me or does anyone else think King Edward VII looks a bit like Burl Ives in that picture?
Re #79: Gage was indeed 25 at the time of his accident, but the “many” who “think” the photo was taken “a couple of years later” are just guessing — there are too many unknowns.
With all due respect, it doesn’t “all depend on what article you read”: it depends on who makes the most reasoned argument backed up by actual evidence. The “Neurophilosphy” blog you cite is well meant, but contains a lot of misinformation e.g. that Gage suffered a “complete loss of social inhibitions, which often led to inappropriate behaviour,” and that “in effect, the tamping iron had performed a frontal lobotomy on Gage,” plus the “wife” fiction already mentioned. It’s all complete baloney. (And while he was at it, “Neurophilosophy” used others’ material without attribution.)
Lost in all this is how wonderful it is that you selected Gage’s portrait as your “#1″. I’ve been researching Gage for three years (and my colleague Malcolm Macmillan has been at it almost 30 years) and it’s time Gage got some real recognition!
PS with regard to #81: It’s well known that Burl Ives and Edward VII were the same person. If you don’t believe me, just ask yourself: have you ever seen them together?
to dbrownl – comment number 2
What is the point of saying that? Why spread depression around even further? I happen to be slightly depressed at the moment, so get particularly upset and offended by people being blase and condenscending about things when there is no need to bring others down.
In future, do not waste your time writing because we have to inevitably waste our time reading. Nasty little bigot.
@Matthew L Lena (Boston) (82):
Matthew L Lena, Wow, well that certainly beats out my research. Thank you again for clearing up and clarifying some of the facts about this interesting guy. Once I read all of the details about Phineas Gage there was no one that could have knocked him out of the number one spot.
“The autochromes were forgotten in a cupboard in Exbury House until they were discovered by de Rothschild’s grandson wrapped in old newspapers.”
You’d think someone that rich could afford clothes.
Roger
#6 is an obvious fake. Why would a photograph so dramatically revealing and clear suddenly appear 40 years later. If it were real, it would’ve been on the front page of the times and printed in every science textbook in the U.S. back in 69.
@Freshies (49): @paul (86):
It was discovered later because the image appears on film for only a split second so if you blink you could have missed it. The image is a single frame of film and was just recently made into a picture after the film was transferred to a high def format.
Blogball! Another great photography list!
Are you trying to make me feel unskilled and useless behind the camera? You are doing a fine job of it, my good man!
All kidding aside, you do have a tremendous ability to turn out one fabulous List after another, usually on photography.
~sob~
Congratulations, guy, another winner on LV!
I love the Peter Schiff one! He was a cutie. I can see why Anne was so in love with him.
This has to be one of the best lists. I also love the photography themed ones and the historical aspect make it even more compelling.
Along the same lines as some of your pictures, recently they discovered some old photos of Marilyn Monroe in the Life Magazine archives: http://www.life.com/image/88010853/in-gallery/27412
Apparently she was an unknown at the time the photos were taken and so they weren’t published. They were found while digitizing Life’s vast collection.
Phineas Gage is HOTT!
wow list! amazing because of the photo of Peter Schiff. ive been wanting to see how he looked like.very very nice!
Blogball gave the book a rating of 5 stars. Could there be the remotest hint of bias in that rating?
@astraya (93): I give this list 5 stars! No bias.
@astraya (93):
It was your list in the book that boosted it to the 5 star rating
I really have been enjoying the book. The 5 stars is legit.
In question are most of the extra ones I had thought of after going through this list (of which I dont think has been mentioned in the comments by anyone), which include The Robert Johnson picture purchased off of Ebay last year and as featured in its public debut amongst the pages of Vanity Fair. The attack on Pearl Harbor pictures that had been supposably on undeveloped film in a brownie camera stored in a footlocker all this time. The Van Gogh picture. And What’s the update on the supposed oldest photograph that shows a leaf (which must be on another list on this site, I’m sure)?
Okay, so the Pearl Harbor ones are a fake backstory from what I can tell simply by looking up links to internet info but if somebody has some conclusive info, please tell. Anyway, with the the other photos I have mentioned….does anybody have any closed case evidence? I know “the experts” say yes and no, here and there. But I think with the public news , the breaking story is what counts and all the real work and what fits before,in between, and after–is not of interest. So, anybody have any inside scoop or up to date info about the (1) leaf photograph -was it sold in auction before a final “oldest photograph certificate” was declared, (2) the Victor Morin photograph of Vincent Van Gogh , the Robert Johnson picture (Is it his brother, or BB King or neither)? I have read a few online things bout’ all these but what I mean is offline real data. The Pearl Harbor backstory seems fraudulent enough, after just a quick computer search. but I’m rather interested in the other three.
If I dont receive any answers that satisfy than I’ll do my own damn research and make some calls, otherwise..
Toodaloo!
The Robert Johnson article:
http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2008/11/johnson200811
and its *****ysis:
http://www.vanityfair.com/online/culture/2008/10/27/a-disputed-robert-johnson-photo-gets-the-csi-treatment.html
What the backstory on the footlocker Pearl Harbor pictures stated:
http://www.snopes.com/photos/military/pearlharbor.asp
The Thomas_Wedgwood leaf photo as reported in NYT:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/17/arts/design/17phot.html?_r=1
the Vincent picture in question:
http://www.vangoghfoto.com/images/vincent.jpg
Nice job, Blogball. (FlameHorse, you are still my number one fav. *smiles*)
I have a degree in 19th century U.S. history and always thought I should have written my master’s thesis on something to do with the development of photography. Such an interesting time – plus old photos are fun and creepy.
@winchestre (96): Oh wel thank you! Sorry, Blog. *sheepish shrug*
@Juan (15): Are we the only ones suspect of the moon landing’s authenticity? Um? How the f**k does NASA lose a damn moon picture? Did they forget to pick it up from the Photo Hut?
Ah, Florence Nightingale.
This list was awesome. More!!!
Do more of these kind of lists! This one was AWESOME!!!
I love looking at old photographs! You should definitely make more lists like this.
i like # 9 very much! super! i like different lists of interesting facts in general and this one is also great!!!
Great List amazing!
very interisting black and white and documenter photography.
@Blogball (95): Which list of mine is in the book? I’ve frantically looked through the index online, and can’t spot anything that looks familiar.
Very creative idea for a list, and a very well fulfilled task. I liked #1 and #2 especially (were they in any particular order? If so, I coulnd’t agree more).
I remember reading a neurophysiology book in college that stated that Phineas Gage’s wife was one of the first to notice his altered behaviour. I really don’t think that they cited sources on this, though.
As always another great Blogball list
weird, because a while ago i was watching a video about the moon exploration being a hoax.
@Juan (15): i agree with your point.
anne frank has a good taste hihihi.
great list btw, it’s very fascinating, interesting, and a tad creepy.
its like watching *****, and discovering that the *****star on the is already dead.
*on the video
sorry i post too much
Amazing list!!!! So interesting. The one of Peter Schiff gave me chills, tragic.
a picture is worth a thousand words
re #108: You’ll find many books and papers endowing Gage with a wife, but it’s just as you say: none of them cite to anything, except maybe to one another. Gage’s doctor is (with minor exceptions) our only first-hand source, and his 20-page case report describes sickbed visits by Gage’s mother, uncle, coworkers, and friends — but nothing about a spouse. And eight years after Gage’s death, mother gave doctor a history of Gage’s life after the accident — no wife here either.
Most writing on Gage goes on in a sort of echo chamber, authors uncritically rehashing what others have written, apparently assuming that someone somewhere must have actually checked the facts. Unfortunately, the work on Gage which is best known to the public is Antonio Damasio’s *Descartes’ Error*, which presents a completely fabricated account of Gage’s accident and life. Sadly, John Fleischman’s 2002 *Phineas Gage: A Gruesome but True Story about Brain Science* — a children’s book — is more factually reliable than Damasio — who’s a neurologist!
I recommend en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phineas_Gage or for the full treatment try my colleague Malcolm Macmillan’s *An Odd Kind of Fame: Stories of Phineas Gage.*
@astraya (107): astraya, in the book you are listed as one of the contributors.
Nice photograph. Salam
@Matthew L Lena:
Thanks for the detailed answer!
@Diogenes (96): You ask, “the Pearl Harbor ones are a fake backstory from what I can tell simply by looking up links to internet info but if somebody has some conclusive info, please tell.” Just by looking at the photos on the link you provided at Snopes.com, it’s easy to see the story is a fake. No one person could have been at all the locations depicted in the pictures at the time of the attack. A couple of them are aerial shots, the rest are from the ground and all are taken during the attack. In order to get all those angles he would have to have been in several places at the same time.
These photos are so interesting. I think that the NYC shot is absolutely incredible. thatswhatshereallysaid.wordpress.com