Comedy seems to work best when done in groups. This is not just true of older comedy routines – most modern television comedy hits are such due to the supporting actors. For example, Will and Grace would never have survived were it not for the character of Karen Walker. This list looks at ten of the most prolific and most well known comedy teams. It is perhaps a little light on the British comedy duos such as the Goons – but do feel free to name them all in the comments.
Voiced by Freeman Gosden and Charles Correll, performing on the radio from 1928 all the way 1960. This sketch comedy act was based on turn of the century black minstrel acts, and the two voice artists depicted black people as poor, lower class menial workers, who eventually move from Georgia to Chicago and become taxi drivers.
At least once, in 1931, when the Pittsburgh Courier took up the article of a black preacher who considered the show racially offensive (since the two voice artists were white). They tried to get a million names on a petition, in order to get the show canceled, but few people would sign it, not out of racial fear as much as out of enjoyment of the show. The black leads are always shown to be very simple-minded, but very polite and good-natured, and smarter than the average white man. They also thrived on malaprops, which are incorrect uses of a language. One of George “Kingfish” Stevens’s (played by Gosden) best such lines is, “Heck, naw, I ain’t gawn let my kids use no ‘cyclopedia! They kin walk to school like I did!”
This was subsequently blamed on Yogi Berra, who, never to be outdone, said, “I didn’t say half the stuff I said.”
Werner Groebli and Hans Mauch, respectively. They were comedic figure skaters, both from Basel, Switzerland, and performed all over the world in lederhosen and traditional German “Oktoberfest” garb.
They performed in a few films, beginning with Lady, Let’s Dance, in 1944. They never performed in the Olympics, but a lot of Olympic figure skaters think they would have been shoe-ins for gold medals.
“Frick and Frack” has become a household phrase in English, due to their popularity from the 1930s to the 1950s. Some of the stunts they performed defy belief, most notably Frack’s rubber legs, which were twisting, collapsing legs while skating in a spread-eagle.
Frick’s signature move was a cantilever spread-eagle, which he invented.
Tommy Smothers always plays the slower buffoon to Dick Smothers’s straight man. Tommy’s signature line was “Mom always liked you best!” after which they would argue over whether that were true or not. When their mother died, they never performed this routine again.
They are accomplished guitar players, and Tommy is a master of the yo-yo. They have the distinction of being the longest-lived comedy team in American history, having performed for about 52 years.
During the late 1960s, they had their own show, “The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour,” which was extremely controversial (and funny) because of their peace advocacy. They regularly poked fun at the Vietnam War, President Nixon, and racism. The show lasted an amazing 2 years, 1967 to 1969, before being canceled for what CBS was forced to call “Anti-American Peace Propaganda.” Ah, the ’60s.
The hippies and counter-culturalists found their idols in the weed-smoking surrealists Cheech Marin and Tommy Chong. They broke up in 1985, but reunited in 2008 much to everyone’s delight.
They made a number of films from 1978 through the 1980s, all having heavily to do with drug use, the free love of hippies, etc. Arguably their best work is the 1983 film Still Smokin’, in which they travel to Amsterdam, Netherlands, for a film festival about Burt Reynolds and Dolly Parton. When the latter two stars don’t show up, Cheech and Chong save the day with their own live stage performance. One of the best bits is Chong as “the old man in the park,” and the duo as “Ralph and Herbie the dogs.”
Bud Abbott played the straight man to Lou Costello, and even if they had only done one routine during their entire career, “Who’s on First?” would net them the #6 spot. They had already rehearsed it to perfection, but had not had a chance to perform it on stage.
The first televised performance of it was at the Steel Pier, in Atlantic City, New Jersey. They had a few sheets of material written by someone else, and they didn’t think much of it, so Abbot asked Costello, “You wanna do Baseball?” “Yeah, let’s do it.” And they walked out and made history.
It had been many times since before the radio days of burlesque vaudeville, with the simple gag of Who and What being proper nouns. Abbott and Costello were the first to hone it into its modern form of a baseball team’s names. They copyrighted it, and performed it several times in different films. None of this mentions the host of other outstanding performances to their credit.
Well known to film buffs today as a duo of true friends. They were vaudevillians, in countless silent films together and separate, before teaming up in 1927, and remained together until Hardy’s death in 1957, appearing in a lot of films. By the 1950s, their healths were declining rapidly, and they no longer looked like their old selves.
They were masters of slapstick, and an interesting idea that Laurel called “white magic.” A good example is in the film Way Out West, from 1937, one of their most famous, in which Laurel (the thin one) makes a fist, pours tobacco into it, flicks up his thumb and lights it, then blows real smoke out of his fist. Hardy proceeds to try duplicating it throughout the film, getting it right at the end, and freaking out about burning his thumb. They also have a famous soft-shoe dance number in this film.
Britain’s, arguably the world’s, most irreverent comedy team so far, appearing on stage and in films from the late 1960s through the 1980s. Their films are still extremely popular, and very funny, the most famous of which is probably Monty Python and the Holy Grail. In it, King Arthur and his knights of Camelot, who eat ham and jam and spam a lot, traipse all over the English countryside looking for the Holy Grail, encountering a particularly tough Black Knight, a riddle-posing bridge guard, and God Himself. They have no horses, but at least they have coconuts to sound like horses, which a Cockney castle wall guard reminds them are not quite the same as horses. The conversation goes downhill thence.
Their stage work is comparatively unheralded in America, but you can find a lot of it on YouTube. It is some of their very finest work. This lister’s favorite is a bit involving a man who’s just lost his mother, trying to get a mortician to bury her. The mortician replies that the mortuary can cook her or bury her, or dump in her the Thames. In finally ends with the mortician saying that he’ll cook her, the son can eat her, and then they’ll dig a grave and he can throw up in it.
The most well known artists of slapstick in history were Moe and Curly Howard, and Larry Fine. Curly died of a stroke in 1952, and several people were chosen as replacements for a few more years, but it was never quite as good without him.
Moe was the straight man, Curly the comedian, and Larry was something of both. Some of their gags are as physically demanding and dangerous as stunts you might see in a Looney Tunes cartoon. Curly or Larry would accidentally smack Moe in the head with something made of metal, and he would respond angrily, sometimes running a ripsaw over their heads, or smacking them with hammers.
Their slap gags are always uproarious, and one of their most famous moments comes in the short Micro-phonies, from 1945, in which they lip-synch to the Sextet from Lucia di Lammermoor.
Martin was the straight man to Lewis’s utmost in zaniness. From 1946 to 1956, they were the pinnacle of the comedy world in Hollywood, performing around the country and in films. Martin was one of the finest crooners in history, but Lewis could belt out a song when he wanted. They could do it all, sing, dance, slapstick, vaudeville jokes, stand-up, and outstanding ad-lib segments. Their patented sketch was a Martin crooner, into which Lewis would walk with a silly face, and continue to interrupt him while he sang.
Modern comedians of all kinds, stand-up, sitcom, sketch, film and stage, look on the Marx Brothers with awe at how brilliant they were at every aspect of comedy. They grew as vaudeville performers, and although they couldn’t tapdance, they could certainly do everything else, and this lister means EVERYTHING.
Harpo played the harp better than most professionals, and he taught himself by ear. His form was all wrong, but professionals came to him for instruction on how to play like him.
Groucho was a fine singer, and usually sent himself up as a horrible singer.
Chico could play the piano effortlessly, and was loved for his “shooting the keys” manner of playing, seen in A Night at the Opera, among others.
Groucho’s one-liners and insults run throughout all their films and are still the stuff of legend. His greasepaint eyebrows and mustache are part of the classic Halloween, or gag glasses, with huge nose, that kids like to wear, or cartoons use to hide identities.
Harpo’s voice was a rich baritone, and too low for his clownish persona, so he elected never to speak, except a few times at ceremonies, and on a talk show in the 1970s. This was one of his finest jokes, since he was begged to finally say something, and once he got going, the talk show host could not shut him up for a good 15 minutes.
Chico’s name should be pronounced “Chick-O” not “Cheek-O,” because he was the brother all the chicks were after (according to him). He was also a gamblaholic, and they made some of their films just to pay off his debts.
According to the late, great George Carlin, Groucho Marx told by far the funniest “Aristocrats” joke in history. It’s a notoriously dirty joke told from the turn of the century, by comedians who ad-lib the nastiest filth they can think of, and then end with the stupid punch-line “The Aristocrats!” Groucho didn’t care for dirty jokes, preferring clean jokes, in which more art is required to get a laugh. When asked about his version of it, he replied, “Well, bestiality’s not all that dirty.”
Their performances in A Night at the Opera and Duck Soup are their finest efforts. The former includes the famous stateroom scene, the complete destruction of a production of Verdi’s Il Trovatore, and “The First Party of the First Part” sequence between Groucho and Chico.
The latter includes their legendary mirror scene, the lemonade stand, their combat spoof (Groucho wears an American Civil War hat, then a coonskin cap, then a Napoleon hat, etc.) and their parody of Paul Revere’s Ride.
They used a running joke throughout their films involving their meager accommodations growing up. Whenever they spot food in a film, they dash madly around the set, getting to the table, where they devour everything in sight, even their clothing.






























GTT,
I’ve just had a monster urgent work project dumped in my lap today. So my active LV participation over the next two or three weeks is likely to be limited to the odd lightweight or vulgar comment. (Listens for huge e-sigh of relief across the topics!) That means if you reply to my last, I am most unlikely to offer a decent continuation, but I’ll most certainly read. It doesn’t mean I’m ignoring you or may not have an answer either. To round off here I’ll just promise to continue to look for that ref. in odd moments and post it here when and if it comes to light.
Also, entirely agree with you about who throws first stone. It’s very difficult for a theist to begin insulting an atheist when the bible or religion are being championed in the topics. It may require a defensive or even aggressive-defensive tactic at most. As you score it: 0-1.
But if the topic is somthing along pro-evolution lines. Ahhh. Who throws the first stones and starts insulting Darwinian atheists then? The boot is on the other foot! 1-1.
What about Should Creationism be Taught? Or Does God Exist? Probably we would have to do a careful count, and the slogging match score would almost certainly be a draw, or as near as dammit. 2-2.
But now get a time machine and take LV back century by century. Put out exactly the same debate issues. I don’t have to tell you the result. If you think anything but that religious opinion would attempt to destroy any anti-religious argument, and progressively more so as we move back into history. Also that in fact I would probably be traced and burned or otherwise +purified+ by a nasty death under the worst circumstances, you read different history books to mine! Likewise nowadays if I and my views were moved out of the safe haven of our handful of first world countries and were to express such opinions. Think Salman Rushdie. Perhaps by the time we get back to ancient Greece, the fount of our rational civilisation, there might be a chance to discuss such topics without fear of favour. I would like to think so, and grieve for what happened later. I suspect few people realise how extremely recent is the time when one doesn’t even have to think about labelling oneself an atheist or freethinker in public. When my parents were young, and certainly during the lives of my grandparents, only a few bold intellectuals such as Bertrand Russell and H.G. Wells dared to do that. My own parents seesawed independently and over time between religious and agnostic, but they have told me how +freethinker+ used to be used as a dirty word by +ordinary+ people, and that such people were often shunned and ostracised in their communities, if they dared to +come out of the closet+. So are you surprised there should be a backlash? In my experience, the most bitter backlashes usually come from the lapsed religious, especially ex-Catholics. It’s as though they feel they’ve been cheated by a false offer of Paradise and now all they are left with is disillusion and Paradise Lost. Of course that isn’t the attitude of all atheists, least of all mine. I find that standing on my own feet, even as a short-lived mortal, and having the privilege of experiencing existence is a liberating and exhilarating experience. To *****ogise, its like comparing a fleeting, beautiful flower whose beauty you have to drink in and make the most of at every moment while it’s briefly here, with a long-lived one that’s always in its vase. That’s not altogether accurate or fair on the +eternal life+ alternative, of course, but it’s the best I can do.
So historically, when it comes to the religion vs. the lions, the religious long since took the cup in perpetuity! (Of course, it’s understood that I’m considering whatever happens to be the dominant religion at any given time, albeit the Roman and Greek gods).
@Casualreader [238]: Hey there! Too bad that we might not be able to continue this debate (are even aware that we are discussing justice and religion on a comedy teams list?). I´ll try to keep it short (as short as possible). In any case, hope you check in!
JUSTICE:
I agree, and I find the case of the little old lady absolutely appalling. That farmer is one huge a**hole… I honestly dont know what to say in that case except that while shooting the freaking farmer might provide some immediate, short term gratification, how would you feel about it 1, 5, 10 years from now? No regrets?
And of course there are scumbags everywhere, farmers, lawyers, everywhere. Some people will always try to take advantage of whatever system they live in to get the most benefit: corruption, a sue-happy culture, etc. It´s unavoidable. Personally, I try to live honestly, forgive as much as I can and focus on bettering myself (not blaming others for my short-comings)…
RELIGION:
I guess I´m one of those people who have faith but allow others to believe (or not believe) what they will. It´s not that they are wrong exacty, they have made a choice to believe differently. I think at the end of the day, God will recognize as his own those who do good, wish for the good of others and actually help those around them. I just cannot believe that God would be so spiteful as to condem those who were good but believed something different.
Now, you seem to be making a pretty closed argument on behalf of theists… Let´s see if maybe I can provide some sort of alternate perspective? Bear with me, I dont know if this will be clear or not…
I think the Bible is inspired by God but I also believe God is something of a poet (he is also not trapped by dimensions such as definite time or space as we are). God created the world in 7 days? Sure, but how do we know how long those days were to Him? Could be billions of years to us… This is the God who (I believe) created this beautiful, intricate, delicate world… Dont you think he might have a little poetry in his heart?
I´m often told that science and God do not mix, that they are mutually exclusive. There is a simple *****ogy I like to use… Imagine a sunset. Science can explain why the sun “sets”, why the pretty colos form, and even how your eye works so you can actually see the pretty colors… For me, God is the awe and peace you feel when you see a truly beautiful sunset. Does that make any sense at all?
I dont particularly understand how God works, I just know I can feel him.
@ GTT, 242,
OK here’s my quickie before I start burning a bit more work-oil. (And what’s worse, I just had the brilliant idea of submitting a 10 Top Fighter Aces list and won’t have peace until I’ve added to my own considerable knowledge on the subject via Wiki, etc., and chosen my 10 +human eagles+. The details can wait. So many to choose from over only about 30-40 years – and hoping there’ll never be need for any more. Not that I’d expect it to be published, you understand. The fun is in the creating.)
Of course I understand your position. Totally. Curiously, it’s much, much closer to mine than those of some of my good God-bothering personal friends, believe it or not. (Some of whom I would prefer for our friendship’s sake not to reveal my non-belief to!). It bears out a long-held observation of mine that I’m sure is far from original: that +opposed+ moderates, particularly re religion and politics (& sport?), have more in common with each other than they have with their own +extremists+, who in turn have more in common with the other side’s +extremists+.
I share the same cosmic sense that you do. However, I cannot make logical sense of something infinite being apart from what we might call +creation+, for want of a better word. Blasphemy it probably may be to the religious, but to be infinite, something has to be everything, all-embracing without exception for me. Yes, I do appreciate that leaves nowhere else for us to put evil and suffering, etc. Sorry. Less still can I accept the universe was put here for exclusive human benefit. Therefore I tend to wonder if I/we am/are perhaps the living, evolved senses of whatever +everything+ is? I once made an artist friend sit up almost out of her frock (that would have been nice!) by pointing out that all she saw and painted, all the colours, shapes, textures, spaces, forms, and the sounds and smells that accompany them, the vast background we live in, including the heavenly bodies around us (probably thinking of hers too!) have absolutely no ability to sense anything. Only we and other organisms with a central nervous system can do that in any meaningful way. So are we the actual senses of whatever is behind +everything+? Could our sense of poetry and wonder (and those of any other advanced life-forms anywhere in these or other dimensions) in fact be a universal self-awareness, much as our senses and brain perform that function, and the vast rest of our body scarcely does (except for the network of +touch+ nerves)? I find the possibility intriguing and not altogether uninspiring.
It wasn’t my intention to make a closed argument against theists, except perhaps closed-minded theists (there’s a lot of it about). In fact to warp and paraphrase: the only thing to intolerate is intolerance itself!
Hope this isn’t too garbled, I’ve really bashed it out at the double. Bye for now.
@Maggot [193]: That was actually hysterical. I appreciate not only your apology but how much that made me laugh.
I’m like 10 days late on the uptake but still.
No love for Shemp in the three stooges section? His performance ofter equaled that of Curly, especially when he first took over as the third stooge. And come on…Stooges should be #1. When you think of comedy teams, whos the first that comes to mind?
How has no one commented on this yet? This list was awesome. I wish 'The Smothers Brothers' and 'Abbott and Costello' would switch places, but aside from that, this is a great list.
My personal favorite is the slapstick duo of Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy. It's them over rest, probably because I grew up watching them over most of the other greats on this list. Coming in at a strong 2 would have to be Monty Python. Sheerly just mentioning them, makes me want to recite hundreds of lines from The Holy Grail. I would like to include the two greatest phone pranksters of all time The Jerky Boys. Johnny Brennan and Kamal may not be the first ones to pick up the telephone and prank a person on the other end, but I'd like you to find me ANYBODY, who did it better.
How am I the first person to mention Wayne & Shuster?
cool list. i heard of most of these, the only one i have disagree with is the three stooges. i know they are popluar, and i like slapstick, but they were just not funny. i just didn't get it. i heard of the mirror act with the marx bros, and saw it redone on i love lucy and bugs bunny, it was amazing. ignore the flamers here, they don't respect anyone's opinion but their own. cheers.
If this was my list, I'd have to take Martin and Lewis out and put Burns and Allen in their spot.
WHAA?! Monty Python at Number Four?!! I'm all for the classic comedies but Martin and Lewis definetely is not funnier than the six chaps from Britain.
I really expected to see the Blue Collar Comedy Tour up here.
This is an extremely hard list to make, as over the years, comedy has either evolved or changed due to the popular style. Another problem is that each nation has its own, very distinct, sense of humour. it was very much luck or genius that Monty Python caught on outside of the UK, as it has a distinct English sense of humour! For that reason, they should possibly be higher up on this list? I dunno. I have never seen The Three Stooges; unlike in the US, repeats were not shown in this country, so many spoofs of their routines were lost on me at a young age, though I did get the idea, I still never found these spoofs funny! Maybe they were funnier than their spoofs, but I reckon to my age range, they still wouldn't even gather a snigger!
Really hard list to make, not sure if it works or not! Sorry.
stephen chow and ng man tat
Why not have a seperate British list?
In my humble opinion (and no particular order):
Modern brits that should be included would have to include the League of Gentlemen and the Fast Show crew (Paul Whitehouse, Charlie Higson et al), I would also include Little and Large and, as many have mentioned, The Two Ronnies, The Goons, The Goodies. French and Saunders, Fry and Laurie. Also Stan Laurel and Olver Hardy could sneak an honourable mention as being 50% British. I most definately could NOT include Little Britain which, comically speaking, was a real step backwards.
No Bing Crosby and Bob Hope? Come on, now.
Second City – especially group that made up SCTV.
Jay and Silent Bob!! <3
Three Stooges #1!
Bert Newton & Graham King should definitely be on this list!
Honorable mentions: Original SNL Cast, Blue Collar Comedy, Will Ferell and John C. Reilly, Bob and Tom, and Jay and Silent Bob.
also Richard Pryor and Gene Wylder
wow, no ladies on this list?
Good God! What a load of crap! Amos & Andy? Martin & Lewis? Cheech & Chong’ Utter rubbish the lot of them. Have you not seen Armstrong & Miller? If you want older stuff check out The Two Ronnies, Eric Sykes & Hattie Jacques, Black Adder team – any number of others. The only ensemble that deserves a place in your top 10 is the Mopnty Python Team – the rest are non runners. Pathetic drivel. Please try just a little – your readers will appreciate it I’m sure.
George Bush and Dick Cheney in the roles of Evil Clowns of Capitalism and Death
Obama, Reid and Pelosi…the new “Three Stooges”
I don’t think many people would know ‘em, but I think The Chaser should seriously be on this list. Those Aussies are the bravest, most contraversial people I’ve ever seen. Who else has the guts to hug the Australian Prime Minister while holding a battleaxe? Or going to America dressed as Osama Bin Laden asking people about landmarks, and whether there are any “other entrances”.
And do Rooster Teeth count as a comedy team? This list is just waaaay to classic…
Mitchell and Webb?
Name
How on earth did Harpo Marx manage to chat up a storm on a 1970s talk show when he died in 1964?
Name
Name
Youre completely right with this blog
What interpretive post…
Strikingly well executed writing…
Thank god some bloggers can write. Thank you for this piece of writing!
How about Mike Nichols & Elaine May. Sid Caesar & Imogene Coca. Burns and Schreiber. Anne and Jerry Stiller. Ernie Kovacs and Edie Adams. Dan Rowan & Dick Martin. Johnny Carson & Ed McMahon. Edgar Bergman and W.C. Fields along with Bergen’s ventriloquist Charlie McCarthy. The Little Rascals. The Ritz Brothers. And one which most people thought that they seriously disliked one another but was just an act and quite funny was Muhammad Ali and Howard Cosell
This might be the best blog I have seen!!!
When I was in college, I was taking an English course and was required to do a thesis on anything that interested me. My best friend was also in this class with me and, of course, was required to do the same. He wrote a thesis on why we still laugh at the Three Stooges even if we have seen the same “short films” of them time and time again. He received an “A” on it and he let me read it and I myself could not stop laughing. Its amazing to think that a lot of their “short” films are now 75 years old. I also had heard an anecdote saying that Milton Berle was an incredibly huge fan of theirs.
what about Hope and Crosby?
I find The Chasers very funny (The Chasers’s War on Everything, Yes we Canberra and The Hamster Wheel).
Clips:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yFcoAYkKME
The list was excellent. However, I would quibble about the order 1-10 (but not here – It may be from one’s age and appreciation of good humor.) You didn’t name the 4th Marx Brother (Only Groucho, Harpo and Chico.) Do you have the name?
Thanks, much for the list.
Leo
Chico, Harpo, Groucho, Gummo, Zeppo
Just recently discovered Steve Rossi and Marty Allen. Though they were short lived and not as famous as Martin and lewis, I thought that they were pretty funny and had great chemistry
I’m missing Fry&Laurie!
Lemmon and Matthau should be Number 1, 10 Movies together from 1964 to 1998 (34 years) and all funny very funny. even Laurel and Hardy only made movies togetherf rom 1926 to 1951 (25 Years). Also Dad and Dave movies from Australia 4 movies all great from 1932 to 1940 and countless radio shows, TV shows and a movie again in 1990′s, better than amos and Andy
Here is some Lemmon and Matthau trivia for you (but you probably know the answer). The Great Movie “The Odd Couple” was obviously with Lemmon and Matthau as Felix and Oscar. But the Broadway play which inspired the movie was with Matthau as Oscar, but Art Carney as Felix. And we all know that the Television Show was with Tony Randall as Felix and Jack Klugman as Oscar.
Richard Pryor and Gene Wilder!
Jack Lemmon & Walter Matthau…………. Woody Allen & Diane Keaton
Mike Nichols & Elaine May………….Ernie Kovacs & Edie Adams………Sid Caesar & Imogene Coca
Ernie Kovacs & Edie Adams ; Mike Nichols & Elaine May ; Sid Caesar and Imogene Coca ; Jack Burns & Avery Schreiber ; George Burns & Gracie Allen ; W.C. Fields & Mae West ; and who could ever forget Bugs Bunny & Elmer Fudd and Tweety & Sylvester.
why would you put the 3 stooges ahead of laurel and hardy?
Some of the comedy teams alot of you are mentioning, I’m not familiar with. It seems this is an American list of comedy teams with the only foreign team being Monty Python. The problem with MP is that British humor isn’t grasped by all Americans. My brother and I used love Benny Hill, while my sister just stood there with a blank stare. My wife does the same. All the others on this list I have heard of. “Who’s on first” was voted best comedy skit of all time. Anyway, that’s my opinion.
Pretty great post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to say that I have truly enjoyed browsing your weblog posts. After all I’ll be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you write again very soon!
Not a great list this. 2 Ronnies? Morcame a wise? Incedibly funny and timeless.