History is rife with tales of monarchs and royalty who suffered from insanity. Although it may be more appropriate to say that their people suffered from their insanity. In some cases it is difficult to tell if these leaders’ actions were truly the result of insanity, or if events were sensationalized. It also seems that accusations of insanity were often used to overthrow royalty. Nonetheless, there are cases in which a member of a royal family has been irrefutably insane. The following men represent very different examples of insanity. Some were cruel and vicious, while others were frightened shut ins. The matter of their insanity really depends on how you define insanity. Why so many royal men of old went insane is anybody’s guess. It could have been the pressure of being forced into being a king. Maybe it was incest or poor medical care. Whatever the cause of their insanity, it is certain that a number of nations have been ruled by madmen.

Anna, who ruled as Empress of Russia from 1730 – 1740, was not born to the throne – she was made Empress by the Supreme Privy Council of Russia. The council had hoped that she would feel indebted to them for her position and act as a puppet ruler – but, little did they know, Anna had other plans in mind. One of her first acts was to restore the secret police, to do her bidding. Finding favor with the Royal Guards, her power became uncontrollable, and she began a ten year reign tormenting the aristocrats who made her ruler. In the most famous example of her insanity, Anna hooked up one of the old princes with her maid, because she had discovered that his, now dead, wife had been Catholic. This seems rather innocuous, but what happened next is not: Anna organized the wedding and had a special palace made of ice for the occasion. She made the wedding party dress as clowns and spend the night in the ice-palace… in the middle of one of the harshest winters Russia had seen in years. Fortunately for Russia, her reign was cut short by her death at the age of 47.

George III of England is probably the second most well known insane ruler in history (second to item 1 on this list), largely due to the famous movie, “The Madness of King George.” King George III sat on the throne of England from 1760-1820, and it was on his watch that the American colonies were lost – perhaps his greatest legacy. He most likely suffered from the hereditary disease of porphyria, which also afflicted Mary, Queen of Scots. The monarch’s illness presented England with a difficult problem: What do you do when a ruler becomes irrational? When the king became ill in 1788, his prime minister, William Pitt the Younger (1759-1806), and the queen ran the government on his behalf – and, later, his son ruled as regent. In his later years, as his insanity grew, he spent his time in isolation, and was often kept in straight jackets and behind bars in his private apartments at Windsor Castle. In recent times there has been some speculation that King George was driven insane by the treatments he received for his alleged insanity.

King Charles VI was crowned King of France in 1380, when he was only eleven years old. Apparently, he was a good king before insanity took over, because he was originally known as Charles the Well-Loved. It later became evident that he was insane, so his moniker was changed to Charles the Mad.
Accounts of the king’s first fit of madness state that King Charles VI became agitated at the sound of a dropped spear, while traveling with his men. He then murdered one of his own knights and, reportedly, a few other men, though accounts vary. After this incident the king fell into a coma.
The symptoms of the king’s insanity progressed in later years and were much varied. There were times when King Charles VI did not know who he was, and could not recognize his wife and children. Several months of his life were marked by his refusal to bathe. He even spent some time under the impression that he was made of glass. King Charles VI of France died, a madman, in 1422.

Justin II was Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Emperor from 565 to 578. His reign included war with Persia and the loss of large parts of Italy. After two disastrous campaigns, in which the Persians overran Syria and captured the strategically important fortress of Dara (Mesopotamia), Justin reportedly lost his mind. The temporary fits of insanity into which he fell warned him to name a successor – Tiberius II Constantine. According to John of Ephesus, as Justin II slipped into the unbridled madness of his final days, he was pulled through the palace on a wheeled throne, biting attendants as he passed. He reportedly ordered organ music to be played constantly throughout the palace in an attempt to soothe his frenzied mind, and it was rumored that his taste for attendants extended as far as eating a number of them during his reign.

Ludwig II became king of Bavaria, in 1864. During his reign, Ludwig II spent all of his personal funds on the construction of fairy tale castles. He was painfully shy, and ill-equipped for his duties as king. He spent hardly any time governing his people, and had a strong aversion to public appearances.
In 1866, Ludwig was accused of being insane. Whether his eccentric behaviors were caused by insanity is unknown. The man who declared him insane had never examined him. He was deposed on the grounds of insanity at the request of his uncle, who may have wanted control of the government. The day after the king’s deposition, he was found dead in a pond, along with the very doctor who had declared him insane.

One of the most famous Ottoman Sultans, Ibrahim was released from the Kafes (a special prison for potential heirs to the throne), and succeeded his brother, Murad IV (1623–40), in 1640, though this was against the wishes of Murad IV, who had ordered him killed upon his own death. Ibrahim I was allowed to live because he was too mad to be a threat. Ibrahim brought the empire almost to collapse in a very short space of time. He is known to have had an obsession with obese women, urging his agents to find the fattest woman possible. A candidate was tracked down in Georgia, or Armenia, who weighed over 330 pounds, and was given the pet name Sheker Pare (literally, “piece of sugar”). Ibrahim was so pleased with her that he gave her a government pension, and the title of Governor General of Damascus. When he heard a rumor that his concubines were compromised by another man, he had 280 members of his harem drowned in the Bosporus Sea. He was seen feeding coins to fish living in the palace’s pool. These feats earned him the nickname “mad” – for rather obvious reasons.

Ivan IV, or Ivan the Terrible, had a childhood that was scarred by the loss of both of his parents, and abuse at the hands of the Russian government. After the death of his mother, when Ivan was seven, he was left to be tormented by the elite members of the Russian government. He was severely abused and mistreated by them in the very palace that was rightfully his. Abuse gave way to insanity, and Ivan began venting his frustrations by torturing small animals.
In 1544, when Ivan IV was fourteen, he seized control of Russia by feeding the head of the government to a pack of dogs. After that it seemed that Ivan IV had changed his ways. He made a public confession of his cruel acts to his people by way of an apology. It only later became clear that he was dangerously insane.
Ivan IV was a very good Tsar in many ways. He created laws that were aimed toward class equality. However, when he began massacring his people, he showed the same ignorance of class distinction. Ivan IV was also guilty of killing his oldest, and most beloved, son by his own hand. You may or may not believe that acts of cruelty constitute insanity, but if you consider the likes of Hitler and Hussein to have been insane, then Ivan the Terrible certainly was as well.

Maria’s madness was first officially noticed in 1786, when she had to be carried back to her apartments in a state of delirium. The queen’s mental state became increasingly worse. The year of 1786 saw her husband lose his life, in May. Maria was devastated and forbade any court entertainments and, according to a contemporary, the state festivities resembled religious ceremonies. Her state worsened after the death of her eldest son, aged 27, from smallpox, and of her confessor, in 1791. After the end of 1791, her mental state seemed to be becoming even worse. In February, 1792, she was deemed mentally insane, and was treated by John Willis, the same physician that attended George III of the United Kingdom (note the final sentence of item 9). He wanted to take her to England, but that was refused by the Portuguese court. The young prince John took over the government in her name, even though he only took the title of Prince Regent in 1799. When the Real Barraca de Ajuda burnt down, in 1794, the court was forced to move to Queluz where the ill queen would lie in her apartments all day, and visitors would complain of terrible screams that would echo throughout the palace. Maria died at a Carmelite convent in Rio de Janeiro in 1816.

Prince Sado was born in 1735, and was married nine years later. It is said that his father, the king of Korea, began hating his son when Sado was very young. Sado had a son of his own when he was seventeen. After the birth of his son, Sado became sick with the measles. He recovered from his illness, but it seemed to have triggered a deep-seated insanity that lurked within the prince. The king became even more disgusted with his son. The king was said to have washed out his mouth, cleaned his ears and changed his clothes whenever Sado talked to him.
Prince Sado’s insanity first presented itself as nightmares and delusions. These episodes were soon followed by violent attacks. By 1757, Sado was physically abusing his servants, and raping any woman who denied him. Sado murdered and raped on a whim. He even took to stalking his own sister.
The king eventually tired of the terror his son inflicted. The king ordered Sado into a rice chest, and the prince complied. The king then had the rice chest nailed shut. Sado spent eight days in it before he finally died. Perhaps the king’s hatred contributed to Sado’s insanity. Either way, the cruel prince died a cruel death and, in the king’s eyes, justice was served.

Caligula has appeared on Listverse before, but he certainly needs to be on this list and deserves number one spot. Here is a summary of some of the many activities in his life as ruler of arguably the greatest empire in history:
He attempted to instate his favorite horse, Incitatus (“Galloper”), as a priest and consul, and ordered a beautiful marble stable built for him, complete with chairs and couches, on which Incitatus never sat.
Once, at the Circus Maximus, the games ran out of criminals, and the next event was the lions, his favorite. He ordered his Guards to drag the first five rows of spectators into the arena, which they did. These hundreds of people were all devoured for his amusement.
A citizen once insulted him to his face, in a fit of rage, and Caligula responded by having him tied down and beaten with heavy chains. He made this last for 3 months, having the man brought out from a dungeon and beaten, until Caligula, and the whole crowd that gathered, were too offended by the smell of the man’s gangrenous brain, whereupon he was beheaded.
Caligula’s favorite torture was sawing, which topped another list on this site. The sawblade filleted the spine and spinal cord, from crotch down to chest, and the victim was unable to pass out due to excess blood to the brain.
He also relished chewing up the testicles of victims, without biting them off, while they were restrained, upside down, before him.
He had another insulter, and his entire family, publicly executed, one after another, in front of a crowd. The man and wife were first, followed by the oldest child and so on. The crowd became outraged and began to disperse, but many stayed in morbid fascination. The last of the family was a 12 year old girl, who was sobbing hysterically at what she had been forced to watch. A member of the crowd shouted that she was exempt from execution as a virgin. Caligula smiled and ordered the executioner to rape her, then strangle her, which he did.
He publicly had sex with his three sisters at banquets and games, sometimes on the table, amid the food. He was finally murdered by the Praetorian Guard and some senators, leaving the Circus Maximus after the games. His body was left in the street to rot, and dogs finally ate it. He had ruled for 4 years.
Portions of this text are available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. Portions of text are derived from Wikipedia.




















You could probably make a top 10 list just featuring insane Roman Emperors. For the greatest empire in the history of man, they sure didn't know how to pick good leaders…..
http://listverse.com/2010/05/09/top-10-worst-roma…
Interestng information. Well done.
With regard to all the calls for Hitler, etc., it seems to me that there is a distinction between a “ruler” and a “dictator”. Maybe it is just semantics, but for the purpose of this list, it is clear that the focus was specifically on “royal family” types of rulers that are typically born into power by established succession plans. I mean, it says right in the first sentence of the intro, the list is about “monarchs and royalty”. Thus, “evil dictators” or some such, guys like Hitler, Kim Jong Il, Pol Pot, Mugabe, etc. should be saved for another list (actually, I think there already is one like this out there).
Similarly, with those thinking they are being clever by calling for the likes of George Bush…an “elected official” with a term limit is not a “ruler” per se, no matter how dumb or insane you think the guy might’ve been. And, not that there can’t be overlaps from list to list, but there’s already been a list about bad US Presidents.
George W Bush isn`t a crazy ruler. He`s just a *****ing idiot.
Obama isn`t a crazy ruler. He`s just a *****ing idiot.
Good Maggot – a lot of people are drifting off on this point and even making idiodic remarks. A core issue is what happens when someone accends to leadership by birth and is mentally incompetent to make rational decisions.
"Sigh." it drives me mad when people call George W Bush. Yes, the guy was so retarded at being president, that it`s beyond belief, but to say he was evil is ridiculous. when he was president he was always being called "The New Hitler." because one of his ancestors Prescott Bush had something to do with Nazis. And now people are calling Obama "The New Hitler." Because he had something to do with Muslims and Hitler met a Palestinian Mufti. Will people please realize that George w Bush, Obama and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who`s also being called "The New Hitler," isn`t Hitler. and neither is anyone else. I`m a vegetarian. Hitler was. Does that make me The New Hitler?
Where’s Commodus?
Commodus was sure as hell not insane. He might have been a bit simple, and not nearly intelligent or shrewd enough for his job, but he certainly wasn't insane. Incompetent would be a far better word.
Lesson learned: A movie like Gladiator isn't a good source of knowledge.
Where`s my Neverland Ranch? Ooo oo!
Not Ooo oo! but Iii ii! Imposter!
Seriously look up the "great Turkmenbashi" Saparmurat Niyazov, who was the leader of Turkmenistan for 16 years (until 2006). He renamed the calendar to himself and his family, changed turkmenistan's national anthem to make many references to himself, and banned lipsyncing. Niyazov requested a palace made of ice be made in the capital of Turkmenistan to honor him, but was not built (maybe because Turkmenistan is a desert country…). He also outlawed smoking in the country after he quit smoking. There are many more crazy decrees from this guy, look it up on google or wikipedia.
Though he isn't quite as harsh as some of the leaders above he certainly was crazy in the head… I mean Kim Jong-il gets all the attention but the fact is that this guy was possibly more nuts!
To say Saparmurat Niyazov was mad, is er.. AN UNDERSTATEMENT. He was on a programme called Terrible Tastes of Great Dictators. Every madman was on it. Hitler, Idi Amin, Saddam Hussein, Kim Jong Il.."Turkmenbashi," means "Father of All Turkmen," he did all the things you said and more. He shaved beards off, and his picture was ABSOLUTELY EVERYWHERE. There was a picture of him in the corner of every tellevision that was on, he had "Hopping Wednesays," This guy was a bloody nutter, I swear. But if you have the money and the power to do something, why not do it?
No Vlad Tepes? o-o And what about the Blood Countess, Erzebet Bathory? If these two were not insane, then no one has ever been.
TyB dont confuse psychological warfare and insanity. Plus most of the stories have numbers way of (most of the stories you've heard are from hungarian sources, and let me tell you, vallachs and hungarians werent great friends). And in fact romanians nowadays consider Tepes to be a national hero.
Yes, I agree that Vlad Tepes was a clever strategist and a master of intimidation, but I have read some things that suggest he was really sick… for example, that he would buy animals and he would kill some of them and set others free just to feel that he had total power over their lives… among other things.
I actually think he was a "good" ruler in many ways, though… they say there was practically no crime during his reign.
Bathory wasn't a ruler in the same league as these people – she was a countess – this list was meant to focus on rulers of nations primarily.
With such a reputable site, why is it that you have no problem stepping outside the scope of ethical usage of other people's content? I'm just curious why you would want to start tarnishing your site's reputation, Jamie.
Umm – what are you talking about? Shelly and I have an agreement whereby she allows us to publish her work here – she is credited as per our usual standard.
What makes it unethical? We solicit contributors from many sources and credit the authors. This is a joint effort between Jamie and Miss Barclay. Maybe not my cup o' tea, but not unethical.
Miss Barclay, I would venture to say, would not agree with this 'collaboration'? Usage rights are very specific and you should be privy to the limitations thereof. This article should not have been altered and the 'collaboration' is false. Jamie, can you say that you and she collaborated on this article? If you can say that, at what level was this collaboration? I have worked with Shelly in the past myself, and the butchering of this article is not something she would allow, which tells me that this 'collaboration' is a farce and misleading.
The most-discussed article on her website has 13 comments. JFrater knows how to get arses in seats. I doubt she's going to object if some changes have to be made to accomodate the audience or the format.
Are you the same R.E. Puckett who sells life insurance in Kentucky? You owe me an ounce of cocaine, Bob.
My name is Woyzeck, and I approve this message.
LOL No, I do not deal in insurance. However, I happen to have firsthand knowledge from Miss Barclay herself that ONLY usage right were granted and alteration of the content WAS NOT authorized. This is not the first time, however, that Jamie has taken advantage of the scope of usage granted to him whether it be per contract or private agreement.
Okay I have had enough of this – you do NOT have firsthand knowledge of such because I just showed you the email in which she DID give the right to alter. None of her text was altered but as per her instructions I added six entries to make it a top 10. Now stop whining about things you have no knowledge of.
You can't fool me, Bob. Just give me the goddamn cocaine.
How about you stop guessing and making stuff up? I AM privy to the details and you are not. In fact, in the email giving me usage rights here is what Shelly said (quoted EXACTLY):
"Since many of them are not "top tens," you may have to alter it to suit your site. "
In your own form, UM, I AM privy to the agreement and your presumptuous attitude is just a little off-putting. However, I can imagine her saying that, but what I read is that, "If it is not in list format, you can change the format to be more conducive as a list for your site." I don't think it means to add content to it or change content around all together and definitely not adding your name to it as if it were a collaboration. Miss Barclay granted usage right only which means the precise content should remain unaltered.
Stop now – Shelly can talk to me directly – I am not answerable to you and you are a complete stranger who is acting like her legal representation.
what a stupid *****
made my morning .
THIS THREAD MADE MY ASS ITCH.
haha xDD i loved this xDD
nice job
No – ***** off.
Good defense. Spoken like a true man of integrity. Good day.
Honestly I am far too busy working on the site relaunch to deal with inanities like yours – if you have a problem take it up with Shelly. I am not answerable to you and have no intentions of doing so.
i'm so disappointed to not find vlad the impailer or vlad tepes or whatever you want to call him. with every scroll down i was happy not to see him thinking he's one of the first places… then BAM! nothing…
Thank you, Lord M: "…it says right in the first sentence of the intro, the list is about “monarchs and royalty”." Kings, Queens, Princes, etc. huh? I just didn't interpret that literally, but given the author's choices, I'm sure that's how it was meant. Thank you for pointing that out. That explains why a lot of people aren't on this list.
Given that, I'd still like to see Vlad on here. And I suppose we could all come up with a few other candidates. And it is still depressing to realize how many would qualify for this list…
How about a list of rulers (not royalty) that were insane — Kim Jong Il, Ahmedinejad, Idi Amin, Saddam Hussein, Hitler, Nixon, Stalin, Robert Mugabe, G W Bush — Hey, I almost made the list right there!!
In what manner exactly were/are Ahmadinejad, Nixon and Bush insane?
Hitler & Stalin should both be on this list.
yes and GHW Bush
hahhaha/….somethings r better left unsaid =>
Instead of Ivan IV, who was a mighty and great Czar, I would put Peter III. Maybe not 100% insane but so very stupid and disappointing that it's mind boggling.
Different from what I was expecting, but still good.
Now just imagine you got the best seats to watch the games at old Rome, right next to the arena, and them you end up beeing throwed into it to be eaten by lions…
Ahahahahahahaha horse priest?!!
yeah hahaha most priests are supposed to be dogs!!
Good Morning listversers.
Hitler should have been on the list, because "ruler" isn't strictly for royalty.
…rather disappointing article. Roman Empire alone bred enough madmen to populate 10 times longer list than this. Also desriptions of rulers insanites are vague at least.
(
Why does everyone insist Hitler be on this list? Hitler was in no way insane. Was what he was doing morally wrong? Yes. Is he the only leader to willing try and commit genocide? No. In fact, he was just trying to enact the final book of the New Testament. None of his decisions were irrational from Germany's position.
In fact, a lot of these list entries are hardly examples of "insane" rulers. If some of the things on this list truly credit someone with being insane, then I guess most of those with homicide charges must be insane too.
Is there really a difference after all between insane and morally totally wrong? I think that when you take those to the extreme it really leaves you at the same spot… http://bit.ly/d4cPsY
After reading things about Caligula, Hitler seems like a really sympathetic and normal fella. Or maybe I've just watched too many Downfall parodies on youtube.
Ummm… Idi Amin?!
Maggie Thatcher
I'm seeing a lot of U.S. Presidents on the comments here, and not rightfully. Probably the only U.S. President who would deserve to be on this list was Woodrow Wilson. He DID go nuts.
Minor corrections on King Ludwig II — he died in 1886, not 1866, and he drowned in a very large lake (14 miles long), not a pond. His body and that of his doctor were found fairly close to shore, though. Ironically he was succeeded by his brother, who was later deemed truly insane.
"and it was rumored that his taste for attendants extended as far as eating a number of them during his reign".
I just wanted to say that I think that sentence was so well written, I read the word taste so I was thinking about my mouth and then read about him eating people so I was like ewwwwwwww!
Nice list, I'm a bit of history/classics nerd so these were the rulers I expected to read about, I didn't even think about Hitler. How about we have a list of insane modern rulers too? Idi Amin sounds totally weird…
How about Tony Blair for allowing Scottish, Welsh and Irish members of parliement to vote on english matters but not allowing English members of parliement to vote on Scottsh, Welsh or Northern Irish matters?
What she asked of me at the end of the day, Caligula would have blushed…
No Elizabeth I of England?!?!
Lol….inbreds……
Abolute power corrupts – Absolutely
man, this stuff about caligula is not very factually accurate. too bad cause he was a pretty interesting character.
Why isn't the serial killing Romanian Emperor Vlad Dracul the Impaler on this list? He killed so many thousands of people that he was able to build a wall around his castle, made out of the bodies and he went around nailing hats to the heads of people silly enough to defy him by wearing one.
or Baroness Bethany blood bathing cannibal supreme, who had built the world's first shower stall, by hanging her servents in a suspeded cage and than poked them with spears so she could take a shower in their blood (believing it gave her eternal youth)?
now I'm not a nazi but Hitler was not insane needer was Saddam, evil, yes but insanity is something different.
Disappointed Vlad Tepes didn't make the list.
you forgot to add Emperor Nero, who burned down half of Rome and played a fiddle while he watched his damn city fall into flames.
I agree with Caligula
Where is Tiberius?? He had children suck his dick and testicles.
i’m looking for investor
i have vary beautiful island if any one want invest to billed a resort please contact me this is my Email jageyrose7@live.vom T +9607460328
island was in MALDIVES
I would have put Nero in a heart beat over Caligula. Caligula was callous not insane. He was evil, yes, but not the utterly insane madman his successor would be.
Well, where is Emperor Nero and Emperor Constantine?