8 Crazy Experiments Passed Off As Art
Over the centuries our definition of âartâ has changed a lot. Three hundred years ago, it meant paintings of trees. A hundred years ago, it meant paintings of squares. Today it means âinsanityâ. Yeah, since the advent of pop art and postmodernism, art has apparently gone from being an outlet for tortured poets, to something practiced exclusively by mad scientists. How else do you explain deranged social experiments likeâŠ?
You could write an entire article titled â10 Reasons Chris Burden was Crazier than a Shithouse Ratâ and still have plenty of examples to spare. For one, he once asked a friend to shoot him with a rifle (which the âfriendâ then did); while another bout of insanity saw him nail himself to his carâa feat so uniquely crazy, David Bowie wrote a song about it.
But the absolute most-lunatic stunt he ever pulled was in 1975. Interested to see at what point an audience might intervene, he placed himself under a glass sheet next to a clock and lay there completely immobile. The plan was to not move until a visitor to the gallery got worried and tried to help him, but hereâs the kicker: they didnât. Even after Burden had crapped his pants and gone nearly two days without water, people just nodded politely and left him to it. The only reason his desiccated corpse isnât still lying there now is because a gallery attendant got nervous and left a glass of water next to him: at which point Burden finally cracked and ended the show.
Most of us who hear the words âvideo artâ instinctively turn and run as fast as we can from whoever said them, but Tony Conradâs work is a little different. While itâs not exactly The Godfather, or even Godfather Part III, it aims to do something no mainstream blockbuster ever would: give you acid-trip hallucinations.
You read that right: the entire purpose of his 1966 film âThe Flickerâ was to send the viewer into a state of advanced schizophrenia (for the love of God, DO NOT click that link if you suffer from epilepsy). Featuring nothing more than flickering lights projected in a darkened room, the experience was said to be such a âtripâ that it acted as visual LSD, giving rise to all sorts of crazy visions. This being the 60s, people loved itâleading to a whole heck-load of imitators: including Paul Shartisâ âTOUCHINGââwhich went one sense further by screwing with your hearing as well.
If you need final proof that our species is psychologically doomed, look no further than Marina Abramovicâs Rhythm 0. In 1974, Abramovic staged a performance piece where she sat immobile in a chair, next to a sign informing her audience they could do whatever they wanted to her. Just to make it clear she meant âanythingâ there was a table nearby covered in stuff like whips, scalpels, scissors and a loaded gun.
Now comes the terrifying part: her audience totally got into it. And I mean âtotallyâ: over the course of six hours they tore her clothes off, jabbed rose thorns in her stomach, cut her and put the loaded gun to her headâa litany of sadism that would be extreme in an Eli Roth movie, let alone an art gallery. Eventually, the performance ended when Abramovic suddenly got to her feetâat which point all her tormentors did exactly what challenged bullies always do and ran away like a bunch of frightened schoolgirls.
Given what we know about the internet, itâs safe to assume the last thing any of us would want to do is plug ourselves into itâunless we wanted to spend the rest of our lives as the abused plaything of remorseless teenagers on 4Chan. Yet, in 1995, performance artist Stelarc did just that. Inserting electrodes into his muscles, Stelarc wired himself up to a network that allowed members of the public in Amsterdam, Paris or Helsinki to literally manipulate him from afar. By touching a button, they could cause his limbs to spasm on command or even move independently of the artistâs will. Surprisingly, participants didnât use this chance to make him repeatedly punch himself in the balls or dance Gangnam style around the auditorium for twelve hours straight and Stelarc survived. In fact, he enjoyed it enough to do the whole thing a second time.
Of course, the internet of 1995 was a very different place to todayâs monstrosityâas artist Wafaa Bilal found out the hard way. In 2007, he installed himself in an empty room at an art gallery for a month, eating and drinking only what was donated to him by visitors. This alone could have resulted in some hijinks, but Bilal went one step further: included in the room was a paintball gun which could be accessed and fired through the internet.
Itâs not hard to guess what happened next: after the story blew up on Digg, roughly 60,000 people flocked to the site and unleashed fluorescent yellow death on the artist. For the last ten days, Bilal was more-or-less under constant fire: a condition that only intensified when some hackers programmed the gun to fire automatically. By the end, heâd been shot at uncountable times and hit around 40,000âroughly once a minute for 30 whole days.
There are a few experiments you should ideally get out the way while still a kid: and one of them is discovering if you alone, in the whole of human history, have the power of flight. But Yves Klein took one look at common sense and thought âto hell with thatâ. In 1960, the conceptual artist took himself up to his second floor window and leapt out headfirstâa sentence that makes even less sense when you learn it was meant to be a critique of NASAâs exploration of the moon. At the time, Yves was recorded as saying he intended to show he could undertake unaided lunar travel: in other words, that he would miss the ground and go careering off into the sky. Was it a success? You can probably guess the answer.
Last year, a Ukrainian artist ran one of the most-bizarre social experiments ever recorded. At the National Art Museum in Kiev, five young girls took turns lying on a bed with their eyes closed while patrons waited in line to kiss them. If that sounds weird enough, we havenât even got to the kicker yet: if any of the women opened their eyes while being kissed, they were contractually obliged to marry the Ukrainian stud doing the kissing.
Imagine that for a second: not only were there enough people in Ukraine willing to tongue-wrestle an unconscious woman to make this project viable, there were enough women willing to take the risk of opening their eyes to see Ukrainian Danny DeVito hovering over them with a glint in his eyes. In the end though, the project culminated with an unexpected twist when one of the sleeping beauties opened her eyes to a female kisser.
All these entries deal in some way with life and art merging until youâre no longer sure which is which. But none of them achieve it to such a degree as the life of Antanas Mockus.
First off, Mockus is foremost known as a politician. However, he has often self-identified as an artist, and his antics suggest heâs not just using the appellation to pick up girls. When faced with a rowdy lecture hall full of students in 1993, he famously pulled down his pants and mooned them to get attentionâlater saying getting his butt out was âa part of the resources which an artist can use.â But no amount of pantless action can compare to the time he ran in Bogotaâs mayoral raceâand won. Twice.
Read that again: for roughly six years, Colombiaâs biggest city was being run by a guy who devoted his life to âartistic pranksâ. On his first campaign, Mockus dressed as Superman and ran around âfighting crimeâ. Once elected, he hired 420 street mimes to direct traffic; appeared on TV to explain policy while naked and showering; distributed âthumbs upâ and âthumbs downâ cards to 350,000 people so heâd know if the populace was happy and created a federation of elite taxi drivers called âthe Knights of the Zebraâ. And people loved it: behind each of his great big gestures was a reason, a lessonâa way to improve the city and peopleâs lives. During his tenure his stunts kept getting bigger and bigger, while all the time crime fell (LINK 11), traffic fatalities halved and tax takings increased. Ultimately, this mad artist used his medium to make life objectively better for hundreds of thousands of people. So yeah, despite what the rest of this list might suggestâmaking ridiculous art apparently isnât always such a ridiculous idea.