There is no doubt that throughout the history of chess there have been many superb players who have reshaped and redefined the way the game is played. This list is an attempt to examine and categorize the greatest of those. No doubt there are many worthy names that could be added, but here is the Top 10 who I believe have rightly earned their places as the greats. The criterion used is based upon a number of factors including dominance over contemporaries, length of career at the top, contributions to chess and individual flair and brilliance. Please note this is not a head to head of who would beat who, as most modern professional players would dominate the forefathers of yesteryear due to developments in Chess Theory, but a historical look at the greats.
It may seem odd to have a computer among the greatest chess players, but that’s exactly what this machine was designed to do, play chess. The rivalry between Kasparov and IBM began in 1989 but it wasn’t until May 11, 1997, that Deep Blue finally succeeded in defeating the then World Champion Garry Kasparov in a 6 game match. It won 2, lost 1 and had 3 draws after being defeated by Kasparov the previous year, though 1996 was the first year a computer actually won a game against a reigning World Champion. The win shocked the world, as it dawned upon us that we had succeeded in creating machines that could outthink us. Kasparov accused IBM of cheating, claiming IBM had chess players intervene during the match. IBM denied the allegations. Kasparov challenged them to a rematch, but IBM refused and dismantled Deep Blue. Nowadays, computers are regularly used by professional chess players as training partners and there are even World Championships for Chess Programs. It is that contribution that leads me to put Deep Blue on this list.
Many have claimed that Paul Morphy was the greatest chess player in history, and those claims could have been proven true had he actually pursued a career in chess. After teaching himself the game as a child by watching family members play, he was considered one of the best players in New Orleans by age 9. He famously played General Winfield Scott in 1846, who thought he was being made fun of when Morphy was introduced as his opponent. Morphy went on to easily defeat him in two games, the second of which was effectively over after only 6 moves. At age 12, he defeated the visiting Hungarian Master Johann Lowenthal in 3 matches, who initially viewed the match as a waste of time. In 1857, Morphy participated in the First American Chess Congress, which he won comfortably and was considered the champion of the United States. Too young to pursue his career in Law, Morphy travelled to Europe. By 1858, he had defeated all the English masters, except Staunton, who declined after seeing the young prodigy play. Next he travelled to France where he easily defeated the leading European player, Adolf Andersson, despite being very ill with intestinal influenza. He won 7, lost 2 and drew 2 and was by then considered the strongest player in the world, despite being only 21. Morphy returned home and retired from chess, only playing very occasional games. Had he pursued his career further, there is no doubt that Paul Morphy would be a contender for the number one spot. He was arguably the most gifted chess player to have ever lived, years ahead of his time in play and theory.
A lifelong Communist, Mikhail Botvinnik held the World Championship on and off for 15 years, from 1948 to 1963 when he was eventually defeated. Not only a great player, he made significant contributions to developing the World Chess Championship after WW2. He also coached some of the greats, including Anatoly Karpov, Garry Kasparov and Vladimir Kramnik. He learned chess at the age of 12 and within a year had won his school championships. In 1925, he defeated the great Capablanca in an exhibition game, though the Cuban was playing simultaneous matches. In 1931, at only 20, he became the Soviet Champion, scoring 13.5/20, no mean feat considering the enormous chess talent to come out of the nation. He then went on to tie a match with Flohr, considered the number one challenger for Alekhine’s World Championship crown. By the mid 1930’s, Botvinnik was holding his own against the greatest players in the world, finishing strongly in many tournaments. The outbreak of WW2 prevented him challenging Alekhine for World Champion in 1939. In the early 1940’s, he won the right to challenge Alekhine by defeating a strong Soviet field for the title of “Absolute Champion of USSR,” however it never eventuated with Alekhine’s death in 1946. He won the newly formatted title in 1948, with a score of 14/20 against 4 of the world’s best players. Botvinnik defended it in 1951 with a draw against David Bronstein, then again in 1954 with another draw against Smyslov, until his defeat in 1957 against the same opponent. He won a rematch in 1958, before losing the title again to Mikhail Tal in 1960, then winning the rematch in 1961. Finally he lost it for the final time in 1963 to Tigran Petrosian. He retired from competitive play in 1970, where he devoted himself to the development of computer chess programs and training young Soviet players.
Alexander Alekhine won his first World Championship by defeating the legendary Jose Capablanca in 1927. At the age of 16, he was already one of Russia’s strongest players and by age 22 was considered one of the strongest players in the world, winning most tournaments he played in throughout the 1920’s and was dominating tournament play by the early 1930’s. In 1921, he was granted permission to leave Russia for a visit to the West. He never returned. Alekhine’s biggest objective was winning the World Championship from Capablanca, though his largest challenge was raising the $10,000 stakes required for a successful challenge under the London rules. He gave exhibitions of simultaneous blindfold games to try and raise the stakes, but was eventually backed by Argentinean businessmen who financed his challenge in 1927. He defeated Capablanca with 6 wins, 3 losses and 25 draws, the longest ever World Championship match until 1984. The victory shocked the chess world (including Alekhine himself), considering he had never previously won a game against Capablanca. Negotiations for a rematch dragged out for years, and never eventuated. The two became bitter rivals. Alekhine dominated international chess for the next decade, until alcoholism resulted in a noticeable decline of his abilities. Alekhine successfully defended his title against Bogoljubov in 1929 and 1934, but lost the title to Euwe in 1935. He regained it in 1937 in a rematch and held it until his death in 1946, largely due to WW2 making international chess matches virtually impossible to organise. After WW2, he was not invited to tournaments due to his alleged Nazi affiliation, though evidence suggests this was largely pragmatic.
Another player who has claims to the greatest of all time, Bobby Fischer’s worst opponent was usually himself. Beginning at age 14, Fischer won 8 US Championships, including the 1963-64 Tournament 11-0, the only perfect score in its history. By 15, he was the youngest ever Grandmaster (GM) and the youngest ever candidate for the World Championship. By the early 1970’s, he was dominating his peers on the chess board, winning 20 consecutive matches in the 1970 Interzonal. By 1972, he had won the World Championship from Boris Spassky (his biggest rival) of the Soviet Union. Many viewed this match as an extension of the Cold War. In 1975, Fischer did not defend his title due to an inability to agree on conditions with FIDE, the International Chess Federation responsible for professional chess worldwide. He became a recluse and retired from international chess, with one exception in 1992, where he played Spassky again for a reported $5,000,000 purse. This event ultimately led to an arrest warrant being issued for Fischer and he never returned to the United States. In later years, Fischer came into further conflict with his own government, often publicly making anti-American and anti-Jewish statements. When his passport was eventually revoked and he was held in Japan for 9 months under threat of extradition, Iceland granted him citizenship, where he lived until his death 3 years later. No player before or since has had such a large margin between themselves and their rivals as Fischer did in the early 1970’s and had it not been for his constant demands over playing conditions and money in World Championship matches, and his relatively brief career, he too could have been a contender for the number one spot.
Jose Capablanca was World Champion from 1921-1927, and is often considered a candidate for the greatest player in history. He was also the undisputed master of Blitz Chess (5 minutes per side). He learned the rules by age 4, and at age 13 he narrowly defeated the Cuban champion. In 1906, aged 18, he crushed US champion Frank Marshall 15-8. In the San Sebastian 1911 tournament, he stunned the chess world by defeating an extremely strong field with 6 wins, 1 loss and 7 draws. He was now recognised as a serious contender for the World Title, held by Emanuel Lasker. He challenged Lasker, but refused to agree to 17 conditions placed on the match by the Champion, many of which favoured Lasker. Finally, in 1921, they agreed on terms and Capablanca won the Championship relatively easily without losing a game. He then set about formalizing the World Championship rules (known as the London rules) to which all the leading players agreed to. In 1922, he gave a simultaneous performance against 103 opponents, winning 102 and drawing 1. From 1916-1924, he lost only 34 serious games including a run of 63 games undefeated, an incredible feat. By 1927, Alexander Alekhine had finally come up with the $10,000 needed to challenge for the World Title. Capablanca was confident of victory, as he had never lost to Alekhine, however he was defeated and lost his title, never to regain it. They did not appear together in another tournament until 1936. After losing the title, Capablanca played in more tournaments, hoping to gain a rematch but he was past his peak form, which he claimed was 1919. Errors began to creep into his game, and he slowed down considerably. He retired from serious chess in 1931, however he returned in 1934, determined to regain the title. While he had some good successes and showed he was still a world class player, he never managed to secure another chance at the title.
Wilhelm Steinitz spent 8 years as the reigning World Champion (1886-1894), though some chess historians describe him as Champion from 1866 onwards, when he defeated Adolf Andersson. Steinitz rightly deserves his place on this list not only for his World Championships, but the contribution he made to the development of modern chess. In 1873 he unveiled a new style of positional play that sharply differed from the traditional method of all out attack, and many branded it cowardly. However, by the early 1890’s it was widely considered as superior and was being used by the next generation of players. By his early 20’s, Steinitz was playing chess professionally throughout Europe, and many branded him as the “Austrian Morphy.” He moved to London in 1862 and defeated all the leading players there. His breakthrough came in 1866, where he defeated Adolf Andersson, then considered the strongest active player in the world after the retirement of Morphy. Steinitz spent 30 years at the pinnacle of the chess world, a feat of longevity unmatched by any other player, though from 1873 to 1882 he only played one competitive match, against Blackburne, which he won 7-0. He returned to competitive chess in 1882, where he finished equal first in what was considered the strongest tournament ever held. In 1886, he played his bitter rival Zukertort for the “Championship of the World” After a shaky start where he was trailing 4-1, Steinitz finished brilliantly to take the crown 12.5/7.5. Over the next 8 years, Steinitz successfully defended his crown by defeating Gunsberg and Chigorin before finally losing it to Emanuel Lasker in 1894 and unsuccessfully challenging again in 1897. Not only did Steinitz contribute greatly to the development of modern chess, he also worked hard to standardize World Championship matches. Unfortunately, he died in poverty in 1900. A sad end to a great champion.
Emanuel Lasker dominated the chess world and spent an incredible 27 years as World Champion, the longest ever. He contributed greatly to chess becoming a professional career by demanding high fees for his appearances. He began to make his mark in 1889, winning several tournaments and in 1893 won 13/13 in a New York tournament, one of the few perfect scores amongst a strong field in history. By 1894, he had a chance to win the World Title from Steinitz, which he promptly proceeded to do with 10 wins, 5 losses and 4 draws. This began his 27 year reign as World Champion. His rivals criticized him for beating an old man and denounced his victory. Lasker responded by putting in even stronger tournament performances. He defended his title in 1907 against Marshall without losing a game and then in 1908 defeated his hated rival Tarrasch in another Championship defence with 8 wins, 5 draws and 3 losses. Tarrasch blamed his defeat on the wet weather. In 1910 it was first Schlechter (who narrowly lost) and then Janawski who challenged Lasker for the crown but they both failed and the latter didn’t win a single game. In 1911, Capablanca attempted to challenge Lasker, however the German put such stringent conditions on the game that Capablanca withdrew from negotiations. WW1 put an end to any further World Championship defences. He was finally defeated by Capablanca in 1921. He was 53 at the time, well past his prime and never played another serious match until 1934 when he took up Soviet citizenship. At age 66, he finished 3rd in a very strong field in Moscow. It was hailed as a “biological miracle.” Throughout his career he constantly finished ahead of Capablanca in tournaments, despite his World Championship loss in1921. While he did not contribute a great deal to chess other than his natural brilliance, longevity and bigger purses, many Russian masters cite him as a major influence in their playing style.
Were it not for our number one, Anatoly Karpov would certainly go down as the greatest player in history. He was World Champion from 1975-1985, then from 1993-1999 (disputed) and still plays competitive chess to this day (ranked 98). He has over 160 first place tournament finishes to his name. Karpov learned the game at age 4, and joined Botvinnik’s prestigious chess school aged 12 and by 15 was a Soviet National Master, the youngest ever (tied with Spassky). In 1969, Karpov won the World Junior Chess Championship with a score of 10/11. In 1974 he surprised everyone, including himself by defeating Korchnoi and Spassky for the right to challenge Fischer for the World Title. After negotiations broke down, Fischer resigned his crown and Karpov became Champion by default. He went on to win an incredible 9 consecutive tournament victories. He successfully defended his title against Korchnoi in 1978 with a narrow victory then did so again more convincingly in 1981. In the Chess Olympiads, he lost only 2 games out of 68 throughout his career. Karpov’s last successful title defence was against Garry Kasparov in 1984 in an epic 48 game match (5 wins, 3 losses, 40 draws). The match was terminated for the health of the players (Karpov had lost 10kg in 5 months.) He lost the title the following year to Kasparov. Karpov launched 3 unsuccessful challenges in the next 5 years, narrowly losing all 3 in one of the greatest rivalries the chess world has ever witnessed. Karpov controversially regained the title in 1993 when Kasparov split from FIDE and attempted to start his own chess federation. He went on to win the 1995 Linares tournament, widely considered the strongest tournament in history, with an impressive 11/13 score. His tournament Elo rating of 2985 is the highest of any player in the history of the game. Karpov defended his World Title against Kamsky in 1996 but conceded it in 1999 in protest over FIDE rule changes to the way the Title was decided. Since then, he has played little chess, instead concentrating his life on a political career.
No other player has dominated as long or as strong as Garry Kasparov. His name is synonymous with chess. He became the youngest ever undisputed World Champion in 1985 at only 22, which he held until 1993 when a dispute with FIDE led him to set up his own organisation (PCA) and technically lost him the World Title, though most chess enthusiasts still considered him the unofficial World Champion during this period. It lasted until his loss to Kramnik in 2000. He was ranked number one almost continuously from 1986 until his retirement in 2005, which included the all time highest Elo rating of 2851, as well as a record 15 consecutive tournament victories. Kasparov began training at Mikhail Botvinnik’s chess school at age 10. In 1979, he was accidently entered into a professional tournament despite being unrated, which he duly won and by 1983 was ranked 2 in the world, behind World Champion Karpov. He challenged for the World Title and lost to Karpov in 1984 in an epic 48 game match (see entry on Karpov) but won the following year and successfully defended it 3 times against Karpov in the coming years by very tight margins. In 1993, Kasparov had a falling out with governing body FIDE. In 2007, Kasparov admitted that forming a breakaway organisation was the worst mistake of his career. The Title remained split for 13 years as Kasparov refused to rejoin FIDE. He lost the title to Kramnik in 2000. Even after losing the title, Kasparov continued to outperform his rivals winning a string of major titles and remained ranked number 1. He announced his retirement in 2005 after winning the prestigious Linares tournament for the ninth time, citing a lack of personal goals in chess. He is now pursuing a political career in his native Russia. Garry Kasparov completely dominated his peers for 20 years, and retired on top. He has contributed much to the theory of chess and rightly deserves the number 1 spot of greatest ever.






























I've always wanted to learn chess.
If you notice the list the top two Karpov and Kasparov are alive today.
What would have happened if Capablanca, Alekhine and some others
in the past had access to today’s strong chess computers?
Most lists concerning other subjects too (like actors, etcetera) are not
accurate since they don’t consider those that have died enough.
what you fail to understand is that they were the best of their time but those after have become stronger partly because of them and partly because some figured out how to beat their stratagies. At the time of their passing the game continued to change so if you brought them back today they would not be competitive because they would have missed too many changes and developement into the game.They are among the greatest ever because what they did against their peers in their timeperiod. but few could compete with Karpov or Kasparov
i interested to teach the chees
Then what is stopping you? Purchase a Chess board and find an opponent.
The guy who writes a list of greatest in chess history includes a computer and not Anand. Can only be two reasons:
1. You don't know the 'C' of chess.
2. You are a RASCIST.
You are 1000% correct.
1000% doesn’t exist.
The indian player isn’t on the list because he isn’t good enough not because he is Indian.
Aparrently you know nothing about chess history or you would see that Anand just hasn't done enough to be on the list. He couldn't beat Kasparov or Karpov in their primes.
“not done enough”? oh seriously???
1) He won World Championship in all possible formats (total 4).
2) been among the very top of chess elite for two decades, chessmetrics rating ranks him in the Top 10(of all time) in every time span considered (from 1 yr to a5 yr)
3) undoubtedly the greatest ever chess player in shorter time controls
4) One of the most prolific tournaments players in the history, won the prestigious Wijk Ann Zee a record 5 time, Linares 3 times among others
5) REVOLUTIONIZED chess in India, inspiring a whole new generation of chess players
6) And he did all by his sheer talent without the advantage of Soviet Training!
7) Even his 2010 World Championship rival Topalov called hi the ‘Greatest Chess talent EVER’.
Clearly he hasn’t “done enough”!!!!!!!!!!!
ok,my final say is that…they should have included Anand..and Manny Pacquiao tie for first place!
Vishwanathan Anand should've been there.
He is the first player in chess history to have won the World Championship in three different formats: Knockout, Tournament, and Match.
That's nothing compared to what those on the list have accomplished.
you clearly either don’t know completely what Anand has achieved or don’t want to recognize that.
sir u r right,,,,,,,,,,,,i m agree with u
Well thought out and well researched list, Iakhovas. I am glad you included the computer one. Also happy that Garry came in first.
Kudos out to the Russians who have 4 on this list.
coolio love chess
nice list though i will have.. 1. garry kasparov 2.bobby fischer 3.deep blue 4.jose raul capablanca 5. paul morphy 6. emmanuel lasker 7. mikhail tal 8. alexander alekhine 9.mikhail botvinnik 10.carlsen
what, no Vishwanathant Anand, because of him, chess popularity grew by leaps and bounds in india
Interisting list, my limit is drafts and dominoes.
Only Guys?
That’s sad =(
Even Machines had a place here, why not a girl? lol
There was a program in Discovery channel (or Nat Geo, can’t remember) about amazing minds, featuring a woman who can play chess by phone, without being in the board against someone who is in the board.
I think she keeps girl pride up =)
Amazing page, one of my faves all over the internet.
thats because no women would make it into the top 25 at least. and who cares if she can play over the phone without a board, that is exactly the same as blindfold chess which i can do with a rating of 1600. these guys have ratings of 2700+ so each and every one of them can do that without a worry in the world.
You obviously don’t know much about chess history. Judit Polgar was ranked as high as #8 in the world (obviously she was the #1 woman).
Hmm, no girls made it into the top ten, eh?
LoL “chess theory” wtf i’m guessing it’s a subset of “game theory”
when i saw #10: “deep blue” of “ibm” and then the following items: “mr. chess” from “country” it didn’t feel right to me
5 mariferh + 6 big al’
that’s why there’s no her in HIStory
HIS-story is OUR story muwahahahaha
jk
disappointed not seeing vishwanathan anand in the list…..
He is an Indian. That is why the author did not include him. Of course the whole world knows Anand is a world champion.
So you're saying every world champion should be on the list? I don't know if that would work since there have been at least 19 world champions. He is only the current one which does not necessarily make him one of the top 10.
I always found chess on a computer boring. The real thing is much better. I couldn’t bare a online game.
!
But Deep Blue still deserved the place
wtf is this vishvanath anand is the greatest player and no.1 nowadays …..wher is his name
There are a lot of players that have been number one that don't deserve to be on the list.
@undaunted warrior (4): There is nothing wrong with draughts – it is a good start towards chess!
a russian making a list about chess is bound to include many soviet players. im not saying they are bad but there can be some others who deserved a spot here….
Morphy woulda made borscht out of Kaspy. Putting Fischer at only 6th is insane. Omitting Anand a glaring oversight.
The computer actually doesn’t out-think us, it just *****yzes every single possible move to counter the player, so it is pretty much cheating
so by that logic, if i am better at chess than you, i am cheating because i can *****yze more moves than you can
And where is Veselin Topalov? Amazing guy, he has achieved so much at such an young age.
Some one said something about Veselin Topalov. There is no room for him on that list no way I know that dude good player but not top ten list. Come one
reading all of these reminded me of only one thing, Kotov Syndrome.
and no, Kotov Syndrome is not just a good song by Rise Against lol
Vishwanathan Anand does not find a spot in top 10, when a computer finds a place! I think VA is beyond this number game, and he is better than your top 1. Thanks for ignoring VA, and it shows your ignorance to the world of chess, and alos brings out other things in you as well, which I do not want to mention.
@mariferh (5):
Marifesh. That girl you are talking about (Susan Polgard) was on NatGeo & why is she not on the list? Any why only men???
Cool list jfrater and to all these people who are complaining there’s no women go write your own list.
Chess… about as exciting as New Zealand is
instead of counting sheep to fall asleep i think i’ll just read this list, or just go to New Zeaand to literally count sheep
haha nah but seriously.. chess
Kasparov is playing against Karpov, his situation is getting desperate. He looks out the window, sees stray cat and asks Karpov “who’s this cat?” “no ones” “i agree!”
(“tie” and “no one’s” in Russian sound exactly the same)
Damn. Most of these guys are my idols. Specially Deep Blue!
)
First I read this list and think, “Hey a great well researched list about a subject I know very little about.” Then I read the comments and see that there is a controversy about it already. I love it that there are people so passionate about chess.
Keep debating.
Thanks Iakhovas for a good list that was a long time coming. But you got a few things wrong. The match with Deep Blue was fixed to promote IBM’s own agenda. It shouldn’t be on this list with human players anyway. Also, Fisher and Morphy are the best two chess players in history..PERIOD. Kasparov and Karpov would never have beaten Fisher. Jose Capablanca also played much stronger competition then Kasparov or Karpov so he should be ranked third.
wtf – No Anand in this list
Shame
i second ya!
what a joke of a list, there’s no Vishwanathan Anand
Looks like chess is the only past time in Russia considering how many of them were Russian…
Me and my friend used to belong to a chess club (geeky I know!) but we got bored and ended up playing Lord of the Rings battles with the pieces. I can’t believe how much much of a geek I am… hehe
i dont think this list could be anymore boring, even if you tried.
Vishwanathan Anand is indeed a fantastic chess player. I see his exclusion from this list as a notable omission … but not as a mark of racism. Picking ten people ( … make that nine ) out of the hundreds of players who have competed in chess was always going to leave out some all-time greats, and Anand seems to be one of them. Richard Reti, Mir Sultan Khan, Tigran Petrosian are also on the list of amazing chess players who got left out … although I would rate Anand higher than them any way.
In case you didn’t know about Mir Sultan Khan, he was something of an enigma. Wikipedia has a good article on him : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mir_Sultan_Khan
To those complaining about no women in the list, FIDE runs two competitions – The World Championship and The Womens World Championship.
No Vishwanathan Anand?
Nope.
Rascist? Is that like retarted?
@Wrichik (32): I totally agree with you. Anand has been a very consistent performer and there were occasions where Kasprov has his fair share of trouble with him in recent years. But Anand is currently running under a bad phase where he recently didnt qualify in one of the Tournaments. Guess the guys on the list are better than this.
One thing is for sure, atleast one woman should have been on the list. Maybe Polgar qualifies.
“he recently didn’t qualify in one of the Tournaments”
WTF…thats plain ignorance
Shame that even in the 21st century talent fails infront racism…I dont know about anyone else,,but Anand is ace in my book..peace.
I think the list could have been extended to a top 15.
Josh Waitzkin should have been on there, but like many other players, he abandoned the game in favour of other pursuits.
As a former player myself, I can understand why a lot of players drop out: The game is largely solitary and monotonous.
@Derek (16): The computer is cheating by *****yzing the opponents moves? Isn’t this standard thinking for a master chess player?
Okay, can somebody please put on an intellectual and/or controversial list already, please! The last god knows how many lists have all been interesting and fun, but can we bring back some seriousness, please, I miss it…
Yay russians!
If you put Deep Blue on here, where is “The Turk?” It was a machine built in 1770 that had a man under the table controlling the pieces with a magnetic contraption and everyone thought the doll had artificial intelligence. He was only beaten once or twice.
I don’t know anything about these players but I know the game (albeit Loosely). I would however like to know the average time spent on thinking over each move between ‘big blue’ and kasparoff in their matches. whether or not they were genuinely competative
Thanks for not trying to be controversial, and put some soccer player as the greatest chess player ever..(like some other list which had cheerleadering as a dangerous sport??wtf?? prolly a internet nerd who doesnt have the taste of sportS), So no bull***** shock value, well researched, fantastic list. Morphy, bobby or gary. but gary overall the greatest!!! like rakim to rap, muttiah muralidaran for cricket and albert einstein for modern science!!
Thanks for not trying to be controversial, and put some soccer player as the greatest chess player ever..(like some other list which had cheerleadering as a dangerous sport??wtf?? prolly a internet nerd who doesnt have the taste of sportS), So no bull***** shock value, well researched, fantastic list. Morphy, bobby or gary. but gary overall the greatest!!! like rakim to rap, muttiah muralidaran for cricket and albert einstein for modern science!!!
For all of the people saying this is a “boring list”.
Chess is a thinking man’s game. If it “bores” you, then I submit that you are not a thinking man.
All wars are pointless. Napoleon, Hitler, and all the others deserved to fail because endless war is unsustainable.
How can you keep armies going if you blow everything and everybody up?
Why are we so concerned about Iraq and Afghanistan? What hypocrisy. We go to Wall Mart and buy cheap crap made in a country that is one of the most oppressive violators of human rights.
While we go around wasting billions on war(US NATO),China is buying up all the worlds resources. They won’t have to fire one shot to have our ass.
This HAS to be the least entertaining list since “Top 10 Bowel Movement of the 1990′s”
Stuck here in the redneck babylon (kansas) very few players come around. But when you do come across that dude (or chik) who removes the wheat from their mouth long enough take me on i enjoy whoopin their ass. Im so good i gotta get stoned to even the playin field….. oh i jus broke my arm pattin myself on the back.
@island_boggs (48):
Again, reference my comment at #46.
at 49 jake, Oh you red necks are so freakin Dumb :p j/k, the only thing i like about Kansas is Tech N9ne. Bout to bubble biaaaaaaaaaaaaatch!!!
at 50 benmark ; Masses are asses, chess is for intellectuals.
This list should have included Polgár Zsuzsanna, known now as Susan Polgar, the very first woman to earn the title of Grandmaster in a competition.She was the Women’s World Chess Champion from 1996 to 1999. In October 2005 Polgar had an Elo rating of 2577, making her the second-ranked woman in the world at the time, after her sister Judit Polgár. She has been inactive and has not played in official competition since 2004. She was born and brought up in Budapest, Hungary, and now lives in Lubbock, Texas, having recently moved from Forest Hills, Queens in New York City, where she ran the Polgar Chess Center and the Susan Polgar Foundation, which gives chess training to children, especially girls.
[Info from Wikipedia]
Very biased list, none of the Great Indian players, just whiter players. Typical, always leave out the minorities and put the whites on top.
Show me an Indian player that could beat any one on this list in their prime. Surely not Anand.
Neither you nor I (nor ANYONE) know for sure who could have beaten whom when BOTH were in their prime!!!!!!!!!!!! period
The list title could be 10 biggest nerds in history and no one would know the difference.
@Benmark (46):
so if i find this list interesting I’m a thinking man? ’cause last time I looked I had the girl-y parts… yup, still there
I’d say the reason Anand is not on the list is that he’s not done with his career. It’s hard to say if someone will be a ‘greatest’ while still extremely active. There’s also the minor point that currently, most people don’t follow the world chess scene. (Strangely enough, there used to be more interest.)
As for why no women… Much like the reason ‘no women’ in a lot of lists based on history, I’d say that it was rare to have women playing chess in anything but a casual way. Societal constraints put a lot of limitations on women, including not being too welcome at tournaments in the past.
It’s amazing to me that there are people who are calling this list boring. They see an article about chess players, but instead of passing on it since they may not like the content, they read it anyway and are surprised when they find it boring. Then, they feel the need to tell us that they think it’s boring as is we give a rat’s ass. I’ve never seen so many whiney people on one thread.
Ay skrilla kansas does suck and rednecks are dumb mostly but we could outshoot, outdrink, and outlove any of the folks down your way. We like potfreiendly texans….. and yeah tech 9 does kik ass.
Oh ya and EASILY out bubble ya too….