There is no doubt that throughout the history of chess there have been many superb players who have reshaped and redefined the way the game is played. This list is an attempt to examine and categorize the greatest of those. No doubt there are many worthy names that could be added, but here is the Top 10 who I believe have rightly earned their places as the greats. The criterion used is based upon a number of factors including dominance over contemporaries, length of career at the top, contributions to chess and individual flair and brilliance. Please note this is not a head to head of who would beat who, as most modern professional players would dominate the forefathers of yesteryear due to developments in Chess Theory, but a historical look at the greats.
It may seem odd to have a computer among the greatest chess players, but that’s exactly what this machine was designed to do, play chess. The rivalry between Kasparov and IBM began in 1989 but it wasn’t until May 11, 1997, that Deep Blue finally succeeded in defeating the then World Champion Garry Kasparov in a 6 game match. It won 2, lost 1 and had 3 draws after being defeated by Kasparov the previous year, though 1996 was the first year a computer actually won a game against a reigning World Champion. The win shocked the world, as it dawned upon us that we had succeeded in creating machines that could outthink us. Kasparov accused IBM of cheating, claiming IBM had chess players intervene during the match. IBM denied the allegations. Kasparov challenged them to a rematch, but IBM refused and dismantled Deep Blue. Nowadays, computers are regularly used by professional chess players as training partners and there are even World Championships for Chess Programs. It is that contribution that leads me to put Deep Blue on this list.
Many have claimed that Paul Morphy was the greatest chess player in history, and those claims could have been proven true had he actually pursued a career in chess. After teaching himself the game as a child by watching family members play, he was considered one of the best players in New Orleans by age 9. He famously played General Winfield Scott in 1846, who thought he was being made fun of when Morphy was introduced as his opponent. Morphy went on to easily defeat him in two games, the second of which was effectively over after only 6 moves. At age 12, he defeated the visiting Hungarian Master Johann Lowenthal in 3 matches, who initially viewed the match as a waste of time. In 1857, Morphy participated in the First American Chess Congress, which he won comfortably and was considered the champion of the United States. Too young to pursue his career in Law, Morphy travelled to Europe. By 1858, he had defeated all the English masters, except Staunton, who declined after seeing the young prodigy play. Next he travelled to France where he easily defeated the leading European player, Adolf Andersson, despite being very ill with intestinal influenza. He won 7, lost 2 and drew 2 and was by then considered the strongest player in the world, despite being only 21. Morphy returned home and retired from chess, only playing very occasional games. Had he pursued his career further, there is no doubt that Paul Morphy would be a contender for the number one spot. He was arguably the most gifted chess player to have ever lived, years ahead of his time in play and theory.
A lifelong Communist, Mikhail Botvinnik held the World Championship on and off for 15 years, from 1948 to 1963 when he was eventually defeated. Not only a great player, he made significant contributions to developing the World Chess Championship after WW2. He also coached some of the greats, including Anatoly Karpov, Garry Kasparov and Vladimir Kramnik. He learned chess at the age of 12 and within a year had won his school championships. In 1925, he defeated the great Capablanca in an exhibition game, though the Cuban was playing simultaneous matches. In 1931, at only 20, he became the Soviet Champion, scoring 13.5/20, no mean feat considering the enormous chess talent to come out of the nation. He then went on to tie a match with Flohr, considered the number one challenger for Alekhine’s World Championship crown. By the mid 1930’s, Botvinnik was holding his own against the greatest players in the world, finishing strongly in many tournaments. The outbreak of WW2 prevented him challenging Alekhine for World Champion in 1939. In the early 1940’s, he won the right to challenge Alekhine by defeating a strong Soviet field for the title of “Absolute Champion of USSR,” however it never eventuated with Alekhine’s death in 1946. He won the newly formatted title in 1948, with a score of 14/20 against 4 of the world’s best players. Botvinnik defended it in 1951 with a draw against David Bronstein, then again in 1954 with another draw against Smyslov, until his defeat in 1957 against the same opponent. He won a rematch in 1958, before losing the title again to Mikhail Tal in 1960, then winning the rematch in 1961. Finally he lost it for the final time in 1963 to Tigran Petrosian. He retired from competitive play in 1970, where he devoted himself to the development of computer chess programs and training young Soviet players.
Alexander Alekhine won his first World Championship by defeating the legendary Jose Capablanca in 1927. At the age of 16, he was already one of Russia’s strongest players and by age 22 was considered one of the strongest players in the world, winning most tournaments he played in throughout the 1920’s and was dominating tournament play by the early 1930’s. In 1921, he was granted permission to leave Russia for a visit to the West. He never returned. Alekhine’s biggest objective was winning the World Championship from Capablanca, though his largest challenge was raising the $10,000 stakes required for a successful challenge under the London rules. He gave exhibitions of simultaneous blindfold games to try and raise the stakes, but was eventually backed by Argentinean businessmen who financed his challenge in 1927. He defeated Capablanca with 6 wins, 3 losses and 25 draws, the longest ever World Championship match until 1984. The victory shocked the chess world (including Alekhine himself), considering he had never previously won a game against Capablanca. Negotiations for a rematch dragged out for years, and never eventuated. The two became bitter rivals. Alekhine dominated international chess for the next decade, until alcoholism resulted in a noticeable decline of his abilities. Alekhine successfully defended his title against Bogoljubov in 1929 and 1934, but lost the title to Euwe in 1935. He regained it in 1937 in a rematch and held it until his death in 1946, largely due to WW2 making international chess matches virtually impossible to organise. After WW2, he was not invited to tournaments due to his alleged Nazi affiliation, though evidence suggests this was largely pragmatic.
Another player who has claims to the greatest of all time, Bobby Fischer’s worst opponent was usually himself. Beginning at age 14, Fischer won 8 US Championships, including the 1963-64 Tournament 11-0, the only perfect score in its history. By 15, he was the youngest ever Grandmaster (GM) and the youngest ever candidate for the World Championship. By the early 1970’s, he was dominating his peers on the chess board, winning 20 consecutive matches in the 1970 Interzonal. By 1972, he had won the World Championship from Boris Spassky (his biggest rival) of the Soviet Union. Many viewed this match as an extension of the Cold War. In 1975, Fischer did not defend his title due to an inability to agree on conditions with FIDE, the International Chess Federation responsible for professional chess worldwide. He became a recluse and retired from international chess, with one exception in 1992, where he played Spassky again for a reported $5,000,000 purse. This event ultimately led to an arrest warrant being issued for Fischer and he never returned to the United States. In later years, Fischer came into further conflict with his own government, often publicly making anti-American and anti-Jewish statements. When his passport was eventually revoked and he was held in Japan for 9 months under threat of extradition, Iceland granted him citizenship, where he lived until his death 3 years later. No player before or since has had such a large margin between themselves and their rivals as Fischer did in the early 1970’s and had it not been for his constant demands over playing conditions and money in World Championship matches, and his relatively brief career, he too could have been a contender for the number one spot.
Jose Capablanca was World Champion from 1921-1927, and is often considered a candidate for the greatest player in history. He was also the undisputed master of Blitz Chess (5 minutes per side). He learned the rules by age 4, and at age 13 he narrowly defeated the Cuban champion. In 1906, aged 18, he crushed US champion Frank Marshall 15-8. In the San Sebastian 1911 tournament, he stunned the chess world by defeating an extremely strong field with 6 wins, 1 loss and 7 draws. He was now recognised as a serious contender for the World Title, held by Emanuel Lasker. He challenged Lasker, but refused to agree to 17 conditions placed on the match by the Champion, many of which favoured Lasker. Finally, in 1921, they agreed on terms and Capablanca won the Championship relatively easily without losing a game. He then set about formalizing the World Championship rules (known as the London rules) to which all the leading players agreed to. In 1922, he gave a simultaneous performance against 103 opponents, winning 102 and drawing 1. From 1916-1924, he lost only 34 serious games including a run of 63 games undefeated, an incredible feat. By 1927, Alexander Alekhine had finally come up with the $10,000 needed to challenge for the World Title. Capablanca was confident of victory, as he had never lost to Alekhine, however he was defeated and lost his title, never to regain it. They did not appear together in another tournament until 1936. After losing the title, Capablanca played in more tournaments, hoping to gain a rematch but he was past his peak form, which he claimed was 1919. Errors began to creep into his game, and he slowed down considerably. He retired from serious chess in 1931, however he returned in 1934, determined to regain the title. While he had some good successes and showed he was still a world class player, he never managed to secure another chance at the title.
Wilhelm Steinitz spent 8 years as the reigning World Champion (1886-1894), though some chess historians describe him as Champion from 1866 onwards, when he defeated Adolf Andersson. Steinitz rightly deserves his place on this list not only for his World Championships, but the contribution he made to the development of modern chess. In 1873 he unveiled a new style of positional play that sharply differed from the traditional method of all out attack, and many branded it cowardly. However, by the early 1890’s it was widely considered as superior and was being used by the next generation of players. By his early 20’s, Steinitz was playing chess professionally throughout Europe, and many branded him as the “Austrian Morphy.” He moved to London in 1862 and defeated all the leading players there. His breakthrough came in 1866, where he defeated Adolf Andersson, then considered the strongest active player in the world after the retirement of Morphy. Steinitz spent 30 years at the pinnacle of the chess world, a feat of longevity unmatched by any other player, though from 1873 to 1882 he only played one competitive match, against Blackburne, which he won 7-0. He returned to competitive chess in 1882, where he finished equal first in what was considered the strongest tournament ever held. In 1886, he played his bitter rival Zukertort for the “Championship of the World” After a shaky start where he was trailing 4-1, Steinitz finished brilliantly to take the crown 12.5/7.5. Over the next 8 years, Steinitz successfully defended his crown by defeating Gunsberg and Chigorin before finally losing it to Emanuel Lasker in 1894 and unsuccessfully challenging again in 1897. Not only did Steinitz contribute greatly to the development of modern chess, he also worked hard to standardize World Championship matches. Unfortunately, he died in poverty in 1900. A sad end to a great champion.
Emanuel Lasker dominated the chess world and spent an incredible 27 years as World Champion, the longest ever. He contributed greatly to chess becoming a professional career by demanding high fees for his appearances. He began to make his mark in 1889, winning several tournaments and in 1893 won 13/13 in a New York tournament, one of the few perfect scores amongst a strong field in history. By 1894, he had a chance to win the World Title from Steinitz, which he promptly proceeded to do with 10 wins, 5 losses and 4 draws. This began his 27 year reign as World Champion. His rivals criticized him for beating an old man and denounced his victory. Lasker responded by putting in even stronger tournament performances. He defended his title in 1907 against Marshall without losing a game and then in 1908 defeated his hated rival Tarrasch in another Championship defence with 8 wins, 5 draws and 3 losses. Tarrasch blamed his defeat on the wet weather. In 1910 it was first Schlechter (who narrowly lost) and then Janawski who challenged Lasker for the crown but they both failed and the latter didn’t win a single game. In 1911, Capablanca attempted to challenge Lasker, however the German put such stringent conditions on the game that Capablanca withdrew from negotiations. WW1 put an end to any further World Championship defences. He was finally defeated by Capablanca in 1921. He was 53 at the time, well past his prime and never played another serious match until 1934 when he took up Soviet citizenship. At age 66, he finished 3rd in a very strong field in Moscow. It was hailed as a “biological miracle.” Throughout his career he constantly finished ahead of Capablanca in tournaments, despite his World Championship loss in1921. While he did not contribute a great deal to chess other than his natural brilliance, longevity and bigger purses, many Russian masters cite him as a major influence in their playing style.
Were it not for our number one, Anatoly Karpov would certainly go down as the greatest player in history. He was World Champion from 1975-1985, then from 1993-1999 (disputed) and still plays competitive chess to this day (ranked 98). He has over 160 first place tournament finishes to his name. Karpov learned the game at age 4, and joined Botvinnik’s prestigious chess school aged 12 and by 15 was a Soviet National Master, the youngest ever (tied with Spassky). In 1969, Karpov won the World Junior Chess Championship with a score of 10/11. In 1974 he surprised everyone, including himself by defeating Korchnoi and Spassky for the right to challenge Fischer for the World Title. After negotiations broke down, Fischer resigned his crown and Karpov became Champion by default. He went on to win an incredible 9 consecutive tournament victories. He successfully defended his title against Korchnoi in 1978 with a narrow victory then did so again more convincingly in 1981. In the Chess Olympiads, he lost only 2 games out of 68 throughout his career. Karpov’s last successful title defence was against Garry Kasparov in 1984 in an epic 48 game match (5 wins, 3 losses, 40 draws). The match was terminated for the health of the players (Karpov had lost 10kg in 5 months.) He lost the title the following year to Kasparov. Karpov launched 3 unsuccessful challenges in the next 5 years, narrowly losing all 3 in one of the greatest rivalries the chess world has ever witnessed. Karpov controversially regained the title in 1993 when Kasparov split from FIDE and attempted to start his own chess federation. He went on to win the 1995 Linares tournament, widely considered the strongest tournament in history, with an impressive 11/13 score. His tournament Elo rating of 2985 is the highest of any player in the history of the game. Karpov defended his World Title against Kamsky in 1996 but conceded it in 1999 in protest over FIDE rule changes to the way the Title was decided. Since then, he has played little chess, instead concentrating his life on a political career.
No other player has dominated as long or as strong as Garry Kasparov. His name is synonymous with chess. He became the youngest ever undisputed World Champion in 1985 at only 22, which he held until 1993 when a dispute with FIDE led him to set up his own organisation (PCA) and technically lost him the World Title, though most chess enthusiasts still considered him the unofficial World Champion during this period. It lasted until his loss to Kramnik in 2000. He was ranked number one almost continuously from 1986 until his retirement in 2005, which included the all time highest Elo rating of 2851, as well as a record 15 consecutive tournament victories. Kasparov began training at Mikhail Botvinnik’s chess school at age 10. In 1979, he was accidently entered into a professional tournament despite being unrated, which he duly won and by 1983 was ranked 2 in the world, behind World Champion Karpov. He challenged for the World Title and lost to Karpov in 1984 in an epic 48 game match (see entry on Karpov) but won the following year and successfully defended it 3 times against Karpov in the coming years by very tight margins. In 1993, Kasparov had a falling out with governing body FIDE. In 2007, Kasparov admitted that forming a breakaway organisation was the worst mistake of his career. The Title remained split for 13 years as Kasparov refused to rejoin FIDE. He lost the title to Kramnik in 2000. Even after losing the title, Kasparov continued to outperform his rivals winning a string of major titles and remained ranked number 1. He announced his retirement in 2005 after winning the prestigious Linares tournament for the ninth time, citing a lack of personal goals in chess. He is now pursuing a political career in his native Russia. Garry Kasparov completely dominated his peers for 20 years, and retired on top. He has contributed much to the theory of chess and rightly deserves the number 1 spot of greatest ever.
























September 6th, 2009 at 1:35 am
Well thought out and well researched list, Iakhovas. I am glad you included the computer one. Also happy that Garry came in first.
Kudos out to the Russians who have 4 on this list.
September 6th, 2009 at 1:37 am
coolio love chess
September 6th, 2009 at 1:40 am
what, no Vishwanathant Anand, because of him, chess popularity grew by leaps and bounds in india
September 6th, 2009 at 1:42 am
Interisting list, my limit is drafts and dominoes.
September 6th, 2009 at 2:01 am
Only Guys?
That’s sad =(
Even Machines had a place here, why not a girl? lol
There was a program in Discovery channel (or Nat Geo, can’t remember) about amazing minds, featuring a woman who can play chess by phone, without being in the board against someone who is in the board.
I think she keeps girl pride up =)
Amazing page, one of my faves all over the internet.
September 6th, 2009 at 2:02 am
Hmm, no girls made it into the top ten, eh?
September 6th, 2009 at 2:08 am
LoL “chess theory” wtf i’m guessing it’s a subset of “game theory”
when i saw #10: “deep blue” of “ibm” and then the following items: “mr. chess” from “country” it didn’t feel right to me
September 6th, 2009 at 2:13 am
5 mariferh + 6 big al’
that’s why there’s no her in HIStory
HIS-story is OUR story muwahahahaha
jk
September 6th, 2009 at 2:18 am
disappointed not seeing vishwanathan anand in the list…..
September 6th, 2009 at 2:24 am
I always found chess on a computer boring. The real thing is much better. I couldn’t bare a online game.
!
But Deep Blue still deserved the place
September 6th, 2009 at 2:33 am
wtf is this vishvanath anand is the greatest player and no.1 nowadays …..wher is his name
September 6th, 2009 at 2:34 am
@undaunted warrior (4): There is nothing wrong with draughts – it is a good start towards chess!
September 6th, 2009 at 2:42 am
a russian making a list about chess is bound to include many soviet players. im not saying they are bad but there can be some others who deserved a spot here….
September 6th, 2009 at 2:46 am
Morphy woulda made borscht out of Kaspy. Putting Fischer at only 6th is insane. Omitting Anand a glaring oversight.
September 6th, 2009 at 3:06 am
I’ve always wanted to learn chess.
September 6th, 2009 at 3:07 am
The computer actually doesn’t out-think us, it just analyzes every single possible move to counter the player, so it is pretty much cheating
September 6th, 2009 at 3:12 am
And where is Veselin Topalov? Amazing guy, he has achieved so much at such an young age.
September 6th, 2009 at 3:25 am
reading all of these reminded me of only one thing, Kotov Syndrome.
and no, Kotov Syndrome is not just a good song by Rise Against lol
September 6th, 2009 at 3:49 am
Vishwanathan Anand does not find a spot in top 10, when a computer finds a place! I think VA is beyond this number game, and he is better than your top 1. Thanks for ignoring VA, and it shows your ignorance to the world of chess, and alos brings out other things in you as well, which I do not want to mention.
September 6th, 2009 at 3:53 am
@mariferh (5):
Marifesh. That girl you are talking about (Susan Polgard) was on NatGeo & why is she not on the list? Any why only men???
September 6th, 2009 at 4:02 am
Cool list jfrater and to all these people who are complaining there’s no women go write your own list.
September 6th, 2009 at 4:02 am
Chess… about as exciting as New Zealand is
instead of counting sheep to fall asleep i think i’ll just read this list, or just go to New Zeaand to literally count sheep
haha nah but seriously.. chess
September 6th, 2009 at 4:33 am
Kasparov is playing against Karpov, his situation is getting desperate. He looks out the window, sees stray cat and asks Karpov “who’s this cat?” “no ones” “i agree!”
(“tie” and “no one’s” in Russian sound exactly the same)
September 6th, 2009 at 4:42 am
Damn. Most of these guys are my idols. Specially Deep Blue!
)
September 6th, 2009 at 4:50 am
First I read this list and think, “Hey a great well researched list about a subject I know very little about.” Then I read the comments and see that there is a controversy about it already. I love it that there are people so passionate about chess.
Keep debating.
September 6th, 2009 at 4:56 am
Thanks Iakhovas for a good list that was a long time coming. But you got a few things wrong. The match with Deep Blue was fixed to promote IBM’s own agenda. It shouldn’t be on this list with human players anyway. Also, Fisher and Morphy are the best two chess players in history..PERIOD. Kasparov and Karpov would never have beaten Fisher. Jose Capablanca also played much stronger competition then Kasparov or Karpov so he should be ranked third.
September 6th, 2009 at 5:10 am
wtf – No Anand in this list
Shame
September 6th, 2009 at 5:20 am
what a joke of a list, there’s no Vishwanathan Anand
September 6th, 2009 at 5:22 am
The guy who writes a list of greatest in chess history includes a computer and not Anand. Can only be two reasons:
1. You don’t know the ‘C’ of chess.
2. You are a RASCIST.
September 6th, 2009 at 5:49 am
Looks like chess is the only past time in Russia considering how many of them were Russian…
Me and my friend used to belong to a chess club (geeky I know!) but we got bored and ended up playing Lord of the Rings battles with the pieces. I can’t believe how much much of a geek I am… hehe
September 6th, 2009 at 6:03 am
i dont think this list could be anymore boring, even if you tried.
September 6th, 2009 at 6:43 am
Vishwanathan Anand is indeed a fantastic chess player. I see his exclusion from this list as a notable omission … but not as a mark of racism. Picking ten people ( … make that nine ) out of the hundreds of players who have competed in chess was always going to leave out some all-time greats, and Anand seems to be one of them. Richard Reti, Mir Sultan Khan, Tigran Petrosian are also on the list of amazing chess players who got left out … although I would rate Anand higher than them any way.
In case you didn’t know about Mir Sultan Khan, he was something of an enigma. Wikipedia has a good article on him : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mir_Sultan_Khan
September 6th, 2009 at 6:56 am
To those complaining about no women in the list, FIDE runs two competitions – The World Championship and The Womens World Championship.
September 6th, 2009 at 6:59 am
No Vishwanathan Anand?
September 6th, 2009 at 7:04 am
Rascist? Is that like retarted?
September 6th, 2009 at 7:08 am
@Wrichik (32): I totally agree with you. Anand has been a very consistent performer and there were occasions where Kasprov has his fair share of trouble with him in recent years. But Anand is currently running under a bad phase where he recently didnt qualify in one of the Tournaments. Guess the guys on the list are better than this.
One thing is for sure, atleast one woman should have been on the list. Maybe Polgar qualifies.
September 6th, 2009 at 7:10 am
Shame that even in the 21st century talent fails infront racism…I dont know about anyone else,,but Anand is ace in my book..peace.
September 6th, 2009 at 7:27 am
Vishwanathan Anand should’ve been there.
He is the first player in chess history to have won the World Championship in three different formats: Knockout, Tournament, and Match.
September 6th, 2009 at 7:30 am
I think the list could have been extended to a top 15.
Josh Waitzkin should have been on there, but like many other players, he abandoned the game in favour of other pursuits.
As a former player myself, I can understand why a lot of players drop out: The game is largely solitary and monotonous.
September 6th, 2009 at 7:34 am
@Derek (16): The computer is cheating by analyzing the opponents moves? Isn’t this standard thinking for a master chess player?
September 6th, 2009 at 7:47 am
Okay, can somebody please put on an intellectual and/or controversial list already, please! The last god knows how many lists have all been interesting and fun, but can we bring back some seriousness, please, I miss it…
September 6th, 2009 at 7:52 am
Yay russians!
September 6th, 2009 at 7:52 am
If you put Deep Blue on here, where is “The Turk?” It was a machine built in 1770 that had a man under the table controlling the pieces with a magnetic contraption and everyone thought the doll had artificial intelligence. He was only beaten once or twice.
September 6th, 2009 at 7:54 am
I don’t know anything about these players but I know the game (albeit Loosely). I would however like to know the average time spent on thinking over each move between ‘big blue’ and kasparoff in their matches. whether or not they were genuinely competative
September 6th, 2009 at 8:23 am
Thanks for not trying to be controversial, and put some soccer player as the greatest chess player ever..(like some other list which had cheerleadering as a dangerous sport??wtf?? prolly a internet nerd who doesnt have the taste of sportS), So no bullshit shock value, well researched, fantastic list. Morphy, bobby or gary. but gary overall the greatest!!! like rakim to rap, muttiah muralidaran for cricket and albert einstein for modern science!!
September 6th, 2009 at 8:24 am
Thanks for not trying to be controversial, and put some soccer player as the greatest chess player ever..(like some other list which had cheerleadering as a dangerous sport??wtf?? prolly a internet nerd who doesnt have the taste of sportS), So no bullshit shock value, well researched, fantastic list. Morphy, bobby or gary. but gary overall the greatest!!! like rakim to rap, muttiah muralidaran for cricket and albert einstein for modern science!!!
September 6th, 2009 at 8:29 am
For all of the people saying this is a “boring list”.
Chess is a thinking man’s game. If it “bores” you, then I submit that you are not a thinking man.
September 6th, 2009 at 8:29 am
All wars are pointless. Napoleon, Hitler, and all the others deserved to fail because endless war is unsustainable.
How can you keep armies going if you blow everything and everybody up?
Why are we so concerned about Iraq and Afghanistan? What hypocrisy. We go to Wall Mart and buy cheap crap made in a country that is one of the most oppressive violators of human rights.
While we go around wasting billions on war(US NATO),China is buying up all the worlds resources. They won’t have to fire one shot to have our ass.
September 6th, 2009 at 8:39 am
This HAS to be the least entertaining list since “Top 10 Bowel Movement of the 1990’s”
September 6th, 2009 at 8:40 am
Stuck here in the redneck babylon (kansas) very few players come around. But when you do come across that dude (or chik) who removes the wheat from their mouth long enough take me on i enjoy whoopin their ass. Im so good i gotta get stoned to even the playin field….. oh i jus broke my arm pattin myself on the back.
September 6th, 2009 at 8:45 am
@island_boggs (48):
Again, reference my comment at #46.
September 6th, 2009 at 9:04 am
at 49 jake, Oh you red necks are so freakin Dumb :p j/k, the only thing i like about Kansas is Tech N9ne. Bout to bubble biaaaaaaaaaaaaatch!!!
at 50 benmark ; Masses are asses, chess is for intellectuals.
September 6th, 2009 at 9:17 am
This list should have included Polgár Zsuzsanna, known now as Susan Polgar, the very first woman to earn the title of Grandmaster in a competition.She was the Women’s World Chess Champion from 1996 to 1999. In October 2005 Polgar had an Elo rating of 2577, making her the second-ranked woman in the world at the time, after her sister Judit Polgár. She has been inactive and has not played in official competition since 2004. She was born and brought up in Budapest, Hungary, and now lives in Lubbock, Texas, having recently moved from Forest Hills, Queens in New York City, where she ran the Polgar Chess Center and the Susan Polgar Foundation, which gives chess training to children, especially girls.
[Info from Wikipedia]
September 6th, 2009 at 9:26 am
Very biased list, none of the Great Indian players, just whiter players. Typical, always leave out the minorities and put the whites on top.
September 6th, 2009 at 9:44 am
The list title could be 10 biggest nerds in history and no one would know the difference.
September 6th, 2009 at 9:58 am
@Benmark (46):
so if i find this list interesting I’m a thinking man? ’cause last time I looked I had the girl-y parts… yup, still there
September 6th, 2009 at 10:15 am
I’d say the reason Anand is not on the list is that he’s not done with his career. It’s hard to say if someone will be a ‘greatest’ while still extremely active. There’s also the minor point that currently, most people don’t follow the world chess scene. (Strangely enough, there used to be more interest.)
As for why no women… Much like the reason ‘no women’ in a lot of lists based on history, I’d say that it was rare to have women playing chess in anything but a casual way. Societal constraints put a lot of limitations on women, including not being too welcome at tournaments in the past.
September 6th, 2009 at 10:28 am
It’s amazing to me that there are people who are calling this list boring. They see an article about chess players, but instead of passing on it since they may not like the content, they read it anyway and are surprised when they find it boring. Then, they feel the need to tell us that they think it’s boring as is we give a rat’s ass. I’ve never seen so many whiney people on one thread.
September 6th, 2009 at 10:40 am
Ay skrilla kansas does suck and rednecks are dumb mostly but we could outshoot, outdrink, and outlove any of the folks down your way. We like potfreiendly texans….. and yeah tech 9 does kik ass.
September 6th, 2009 at 10:43 am
Oh ya and EASILY out bubble ya too….
September 6th, 2009 at 10:52 am
this isn’t a very interesting topic in my opinion
September 6th, 2009 at 11:26 am
@ 57,58 general jake,, mann u hurt my feelings there, i was fukin around bro, i feel the love, tech n9ne really out bubbled anything ive ever done in my lame ass rap career. kansas- 100, sri lanka- 0 …:)
@ 54 notorious,, can u check again plzz, matter fact , if u need a third party verification,, feel free to ask..;)
btw that comment really cracked me up,lol, keep it up.
September 6th, 2009 at 11:52 am
people have to understand here difference between being racist or being ignorant while i say this list is not thoroughly researched upon i wont say its racist……….
September 6th, 2009 at 12:02 pm
@Anthony (54): call the wahmbulance.
September 6th, 2009 at 12:11 pm
Does it surprise anyone that 5/9 (real players) listed here are Jewish?
September 6th, 2009 at 12:25 pm
I couldn’t find Top Ten Bowel Movements of the 90’s. I’m sad now
September 6th, 2009 at 12:38 pm
@Skrillah (46): like some other list which had cheerleadering as a dangerous sport??wtf?? prolly a internet nerd who doesnt have the taste of sportS
A credible argument can be made that chess can be considered a sport:
http://www.olympic.org/uk/sports/recognized/index_uk.asp
September 6th, 2009 at 1:20 pm
@Chess Hater (22):
*Picks up sheep off mid city footpath and throws at Chess Hater*
Whats with the Kiwi hate?
September 6th, 2009 at 1:21 pm
Surely the French guy with the Russian/German name who showed up drunk and then fell asleep on the table should be on this list!
September 6th, 2009 at 1:25 pm
@67 maggot, Im afraid you are missing the point here sir. It was not my intention to bring up this particular point in-order to qualify chess as a sport, i never attempted such a thing. What i tried to say was that the author of the list ‘kept it real’ and avoided ”hollow/lame/BS shock value”.
Genuinity of the author must be acknowledge.. since he did not try to be controversial by saying something feebleminded LIKE ”cheerleading is one most dangerous SPORTS in the world.”
It just had to be Morphy, Bobby or Gary, and Gary is the deserving winner. But Anand shouldve been here, Deep Blue shouldve been included as a ”Bonus” player.
just imagine if Deep Blue was number 1 ,and just for the sake of shock value ( as in the case of cheerleaders) the author has put it there, then he’d have made everyone in the world know that hes just a pot-head who doesnt know what hes talking about.
99% accurate.A great list by Iakhovas.
September 6th, 2009 at 2:00 pm
Why do alot of people who comment on this site act as if these are officially sanctioned lists that will be recorded in the annals of history as the be-all and end-all indefinitely?
September 6th, 2009 at 2:07 pm
Well I can’t play chess for shit and I still loved this list. The mind required to predict/know all the possible counter-moves and keep track of them throughout a whole game is just amazing. I can’t even remember the last move I made let alone my opponents – forget planning 10 or 15 moves ahead. To be even mentioned as a notable omission on this list is quite the accomplishment.
Although I have had one notable victory. (wink, wink, nudge, nudge)
September 6th, 2009 at 2:21 pm
None of the Polgar sisters deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence as the players listed here. While they are very good players, Grandmasters and such, they simply have not performed at a level comparable to a Karpov or a Capablanca, let alone Kasparaov. As to Vishwanathant Anand, his accomplishments now put him on the outside looking in with the top 10 all time (there is no one on the list, save for Deep Blue, that I could legitimately remove for Anand)
September 6th, 2009 at 3:14 pm
That’s true. Women are not on the same level as men when it comes to intellect.
September 6th, 2009 at 3:59 pm
Carole, I don’t know what you are talking about.
Mom424, like you I don’t know anything about chess, except how the pieces move. I don’t understand the strategy, but I found the list facinating to read.
Good List, Iakhovas.
September 6th, 2009 at 4:59 pm
Why not Mikhail Tal? He was the most entertaining player ever and through his beautiful style did mor for chess than half the men listed.
September 6th, 2009 at 5:02 pm
The thing about Anand is that he isn’t quite as good as the players on the list. He has the advantage of being contemporary, and as such gets extra credit compared to those that have gone before, and extremely popular amongst a huge population (India).
But the simple fact is, he doesn’t deserve to be on the list. Top 20? Certainly. There’s no shame in not being in this list though. As for those who contended he deserved the number one spot, well, that’s just insane. Anand only came to the fore once Kasparov and Karpov ceded their stranglehold on the top echelons of the game.
Putting Anand in this list would be like putting Lance Armstrong at the top of a cycling list. It would be showing a woeful ignorance of history, and deferring to an extremely popular contemporary competitor.
September 6th, 2009 at 5:28 pm
@Skrillah (70): Im afraid you are missing the point here sir. It was not my intention to bring up this particular point in-order to qualify chess as a sport, i never attempted such a thing. What i tried to say was that the author of the list ‘kept it real’ and avoided ”hollow/lame/BS shock value”… he did not try to be controversial by saying something feebleminded LIKE ”cheerleading is one most dangerous SPORTS in the world.”
I got your point, but MY probably not very obvious point was, by dredging up a failed argument from an older list, you picked a poor analogy in attempt to bolster your point about this list. It was a good enough point that didn’t need bolstering in the first place btw. That’s all.
But Anand shouldve been here, Deep Blue shouldve been included as a ”Bonus” player.
I agree with this idea, Skrillah. Though it is still a very good list as-is. I enjoyed it. Good job Iakhovas.
September 6th, 2009 at 5:58 pm
@1001 (73):
For the one that said that Anand or one of the Polgar sisters shouldn’t be on the list is a racist, a sexist, a retard & someone who doesn’t play chess for free time.
Deep Blue isn’t a REAL chess player. HE’S A COMPUTER!!!! No one can beat the human mind. I think most of the people here wanted a new list with Deep Blue as a bonus. I hope the new list will include either one of the Polgard sister or Anand. Heck, why not make the list 12?
September 6th, 2009 at 6:46 pm
Wow, you failed top mention Vishy Anand!
September 6th, 2009 at 6:48 pm
Sadly enough, the only people I’ve ever played chess with are my dad, my brother, and my Mac (which doesn’t really count as a “person”, I guess).
I still found this list to be very interesting; I always love to know more about people with amazing abilities or intelligence.
September 6th, 2009 at 6:59 pm
How about this: if everyone who wants Anand added can piss six feet straight up without getting wet, he’s added to the list?
September 6th, 2009 at 7:59 pm
You know why there are no females on this list? Because there are no female chess players as good as these dudes. People who think women should be on this list just to be diverse are idiots.
September 6th, 2009 at 8:23 pm
Whaaaa, no Tigran Petrosian???
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tigran_Petrosian
September 6th, 2009 at 9:32 pm
Ah no need for hurt feelins bro.. alls well i jus fukin aroun to.
September 6th, 2009 at 10:26 pm
@ Maggot (78); Why i came up with that particular example ( Because there are 100s of other lists where the same ”False-hype injection” is evident.) is coz im a serious sportsman myself, and ive been under the Scalpel more than 5 times so far, and i know the danger that most of the sports out there posses. Seeing cheerleading there pissed me off a bit to tell u the truth.:p,so thats all.
@ (85) jake, whos the hottest rapper these days , besides Tech??
September 6th, 2009 at 10:32 pm
Yay, my first list. OK, just to address a few points made:
There are no women on this list, because, (at the risk of sounding sexist) they just aren’t as good as the men. Judit Polgar is an exceptional player, but she can’t even crack the top 10 current players, certainly not the top 10 ever! Professional chess is open to women as well as men. They just haven’t been able to compete. It’s not sexist, just a fact!
I seriously considered Tal and Petrosian, but couldn’t bump anyone from the list for them. They would absolutely make a top 15.
For everyone complaining about Deep Blue, perhaps it should have been an added bonus. I added it there to really illustrate the impact computers have had on chess in the last 20 years or so, and Deep Blue was the pioneer. Before people complain, READ THE INTRODUCTION. It’s not just who was great, it also considers the contribution they have made to chess in their lifetime. Morphy was brilliant, but what did he contribute? Absolutley nothing. Fisher was also possibly the most naturally gifted player in history, but he cut his own career short and didn’t contribute a great deal to theory either.
OK, now for the big one. A lot of people want Vichy Anand added. The reason I omitted him is because he was always number 2 to Kasparov, and he still hasn’t finished his career either. Perhaps in 10 years he will have proven himself, but if you compare him to the people on this list, he just doesn’t cut it. Most of these guys spent over 10 years as world champions and completely crushed their opponents. Anand hasn’t done that yet and I personally doubt he ever will. 100 years from now people will know Kasparovs name. They won’t know Anand. Within 5 years, Magnus Carlson will be slaughtering him. Anyone who thinks it’s because of racism is an idiot. And no, I am not Russian. They dominated chess for 50 years (and still do!), so deserve to have many positions. OK, end rant.
September 6th, 2009 at 10:40 pm
this list again proves that the owner of this site is racist
September 6th, 2009 at 10:43 pm
@ 87 Iakhovas ; Point taken
. Waiting for your next list. May the Noble Triple Gem Bless You!.
September 6th, 2009 at 11:01 pm
@jfarter (88): Your a turd
September 6th, 2009 at 11:21 pm
Racism.
September 7th, 2009 at 12:02 am
I wonder what the demographics are for all the people calling racist? Just out of curiosity. Is your race the omitted one that’s infuriating?
Impressive list. Ignore the shit heads pulling the race card.
September 7th, 2009 at 12:33 am
Putting Anand in this list would be like putting Lance Armstrong at the top of a cycling list?
…curious to know who’s done it better than Lance….list please!
September 7th, 2009 at 12:45 am
I think its stupid and unfair to call Listverse racist.
The right way to describe it would be its too ”Western-centric”.
Ive brought up this point several times, jfrater is yet to address it.
No Prob with this list.
September 7th, 2009 at 1:21 am
People, it’s only a list! Don’t go berserk just because Vishy has not been included, as much as he would deserve a spot.
As for the inclusion of Deep Blue, one should press the point that machines do not actually play chess. They are programmed to find very good moves, indeed such brilliant moves that mankind has problems competing. But that is not enough for playing chess. It is calculating something that can be useful in a chessgame.
In chess, considerations like “it might not be objectively the best move, but it gives the best practical chances” enter. People sit down to an enjoyable game, they wonder at the beauty of a position or a combination. People go for a draw in spite of a better position (or for a win in spite of a worse position) because they are tired (or need to win badly). People get in time trouble. All of this the computer could simulate, just as it simulates playing chess by giving out moves. But it is not playing chess.
m.
September 7th, 2009 at 3:27 am
This list should be on the 10 worst lists of listverse.
Viswanathan Anand after winning World Chess Championships and other million awards definitely should be rated above Garry Kasparov and Karporv.
I think deep blue was just a useless thing to add to this list.You can’t compare humans with machines.
September 7th, 2009 at 4:28 am
OK I guess..it seems like this list was made from a “best results” perspective. I am a bit disappointed to find Kasparov on the first place though.
To name just one example, no mention of Nimzowitsch, who changed the whole view of chess theory and gameplay (google hint: “My System”). In my view, far more influential chess player than Kasparov.
Modern chess players can’t really be compared with the old masters, not because they would kick their asses, but because old masters were inventors. They were still exploring the nuances of positional and strategic gameplay, new ideas were born. Some would call them paradigm shifts. Modern players (like Kasparov) already have everything laid out for them, all they need to do is learn and practice. There’s isn’t much creativity or inventiveness like in the old days (save for the Sicilian defense I suppose).
In the end, I believe this list should probably be expanded to “top 20″ or even more. It just isn’t fair to all the chess titans.
Just my 2c.
September 7th, 2009 at 6:12 am
Perhaps it would have been more politic to title the list “Ten of the Greatest Chess Players of All Time”????
September 7th, 2009 at 7:32 am
man r u serious………….no Vishwanathan Anand………..
September 7th, 2009 at 8:12 am
Lesson learned: Never play chess against Russians.
September 7th, 2009 at 8:59 am
Nice list, although wasn’t it Deeper Blue that eventually beat Kasparov?
Deeper Blue > Deep Blue
Einstein and Bohr would have kicked the backsides of all these players if they had been so inclined. But none of them would ever have beaten James Bond.
September 7th, 2009 at 9:54 am
All Indians here are united against the list here
Guess Anand is the name reiterated again and again here.
September 7th, 2009 at 10:23 am
this is unfair not me in the list!!!!!!!!!!
September 7th, 2009 at 12:07 pm
Talk about strength in numbers. Hey Indians, just because you are 1 billion in number, doesn’t mean you have to be included in every list.
VA is a great player, but still has a very long way to go before he achieves what the likes of Karpov and Kasparov achieved. I suggest all the Indians prepare the same list in another ten years and I’m sure VA will be number 1.
September 7th, 2009 at 8:08 pm
My great-grandpa, Ed Sard, played Capablanca at one point, and I think Grandpa Ed came out on top. Just a family fun fact…
September 7th, 2009 at 10:02 pm
Vishy takes a docking from my grampa Harry
September 8th, 2009 at 12:58 am
A person states that Vishy Anand should be in the list implies that the person must necessarily be Indian. Excellent reasoning, fools.
September 8th, 2009 at 1:20 am
WHERE IS TAL!!!!!?????
September 8th, 2009 at 3:10 am
Never been interested in chess, hence the late posting as I put off reading this list.
It was interesting to read and not bad after all.
September 8th, 2009 at 3:54 am
interesting…
September 8th, 2009 at 8:16 am
Deep Blue is a Yellow Belly!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:50 am
and BTW this list is too Russian.
September 8th, 2009 at 10:31 am
You said the list isn’t just about how good of a chess player they are, but their contribution to chess. Not having Susan Polgar would than make zero sense. She has made the biggest contribution to women in the chess world than all other chess women together. Not to mention what she has done for grade school chess and collegiate chess.
Also, Magnus Carlsen should be added, not just because he is number 3 in the world right now, or because in 30 years he will be at the top of the list, but because his name is Magnus, and that is just awesome.
September 8th, 2009 at 12:17 pm
As an avid chessplayer I am NOT impressed with this list.
A computer does not belong on this list anymore than a calculator would belong on a list of mathematicians.
Maybe you should have considered having two chess player lists, one for best players and another for most influential. This list seems like a bad mix of both.
September 8th, 2009 at 4:01 pm
Where’s André Philidor? too old to be part of this list?
September 8th, 2009 at 4:06 pm
hmmm..a machine that can outthink man?? It will only happen once. man will learn how to defeat a machine,.it’s just playing a simple computer game, you’ll loose at first, but the next time you play, you’ll win..
September 8th, 2009 at 5:45 pm
116 Deep Blue its not like the Chess Titans you play on your computer
September 8th, 2009 at 9:08 pm
Anand and Spassky deserved to be there. Spassky happened to come along the same time as Fisher. He was one of the greats. Speaking of Fisher, the reality of the situation is that no one dominated their contemporaries and all others like Fisher. He had problems obviously, but he was in a league of his own.
September 8th, 2009 at 11:00 pm
No vishwanathan Anand…that’s really sad!!
September 9th, 2009 at 2:34 am
Poor list ever…
September 9th, 2009 at 2:56 am
Anand played Karpov and Kasparov in world championship match play and lost decisively in both times. Maybe Anand had not reached his peak late, but you could definitely make the case that Karpov and Kasparov were also past their prime, or closing in on it.
Anand is also 40. Look at the top 100. Most are in their 20’s. Anand will most likely not be able to hang on to his title for much longer. You could even make a strong case that Anand is a hold out from Kasparov’s generation.
I predict Anand’s reign will be much like Kramnik’s.
Is he top 10? Nah… Personally, I thought it was a good list, but the computer doesn’t belong.
Here are some obvious choices:
Petrosian–greatest defensive player ever.
Tal — greatest attacker other than perhaps Morphy.
Aaron Nimzovitch — Honestly, this one is obvious and he should be on the list. In his prime, only behind Alekhine and Capablanca, and the greatest modern chess theorist of all-time. He wrote arguably the two most influential books of the 20th century on chess: My System and Chess Praxis. Anybody that plays seriously has copies of these books.
September 10th, 2009 at 2:55 am
Deep Blue shouldn’t be on the list because it LOST to Kasparov. The machine that beat him was the next version called ‘Deeper Blue’.
September 10th, 2009 at 9:18 am
For all you chess players who want a bit of a challenge try playing on a circular board, like the original game of chess.
September 11th, 2009 at 11:27 am
where is viswanath anand??? really strange
September 12th, 2009 at 1:29 am
@General Tits Von Chodehoffen (83): Hey! Women can be be as great as men in chess. You either hate women or a woman once beat you in chess & that you regret women who played chess for the rest of your puny little woman-hating life.
September 12th, 2009 at 9:34 pm
This list had me on the edge of my seat. Probably because I was falling asleep
September 16th, 2009 at 5:08 pm
Capablanca is #1 all the way. Then Lasker, then Fischer, then Kasparov, then Alekhine.
September 18th, 2009 at 9:00 am
Hey…this list is all rubbish…!!!!
without Vishwanathan Ananad hw could anyone make
chess list???Before publishing a list, know all
facts and information about the game..!!!
September 19th, 2009 at 10:15 pm
I agree with most that Vishwanathan Anand deserves to be in the Top 10.
And Bobby Fischer ranked 6???
No other player dominated his peers like Fischer.
During his era, he was practically near-unbeatable.
He deserves the top spot, imho.
September 20th, 2009 at 1:23 pm
where the heck is anand ?!??!@?@#$@$@
September 24th, 2009 at 1:34 am
Great list and well argued, you do know a thing or two about chess, something that can’t be said about most of the people commenting
September 27th, 2009 at 10:53 pm
I learned to play when I was 7; my dad taught me. When I was 12 he couldn’t beat me anymore. I played first board in high school. Love the game!
September 29th, 2009 at 9:02 am
Anyone know how the recent match between Kasparaov and Karpov turned out?
September 30th, 2009 at 12:39 am
kasparov 6 karpov 2 in blitz;3-1 in rapid;overall 9-3 as far as anand is concerned i think that he should be at no 6 or 7.he is not only a great classical chess player but also probably the greatest in rapid and advanced chess.he has won in mainz 15 times(nobody is going to come near that in the next 100 years for sure),5 corus titles(another record),3 linares and 3 dortmund.he has won the chess oscar 6 times (behind only karpov and kasparov).not only is he a great player but also the greatest gentleman the game has ever seen.judit polgar(the greatest woman chess player) has a career best ranking of 8 and has a catastrophic record against the top players and certainly doesnt feature in my top 50 list.fischer in my book is the greatest chess player for his sheer genius.he was the won who popularized chess and crushed his rivals (notably taimanov 6-0,larsen 6-0 in the 1971 candidates match).even kasparov once wrote that no one is ever going to show a superiority over his rivals comparable to fischer.his contributions to chess include opening theory,endgame,random chess,etc.he certainly was the most aggressive and greatest entertainer in chess history(refer to game of the century).my list is
1.fischer
2.capablanca
3.kasparov
4.tal
5.karpov
6.lasker
7.anand
8.kramnik
9.spassky
10.botvinik
and some idiot mentionined that carlsen will be slaughtering anand in 5 years time.i doubt that is going to happen.fischer rated anand as his favourite present generation player ahead of kasparov.kasparov is a rogue in the chess board who relies more on his rogue behaviour and mind game tactics rather than his skill.he was lucky to have received great chess education in the soviet chess school while anand is a self made player.karpov was lucky to be made champion in 1975 by default.had fischer agreed to play karpov would have been routed.i back fischer and capablanca to demolish the 2 k’s anyday.i never regard karpov as a world champion.fischer is the god of chess,not kasparov.
October 3rd, 2009 at 6:59 am
lot about you
October 6th, 2009 at 7:19 pm
keshav? Anand better than Kasparov are you joking? Do you not remember their 1on1 match, where Kasparov defeated VA by a significant margin? I think the list is fair, only champions that dominated during their time are included. VA did not dominate his time, except maybe last 2 years, and that is about to change with Magnus Carlsen. I would modify the top 3 players to: 1) Kasparov 2) Fischer 3) Capablanca
November 22nd, 2009 at 5:03 am
Oh my gosh, guys, seriously?
Vishy Anand?
He can’t beat Morphy.
Can’t beat Fischer.
Can’t beat Deep Blue.
Most definitely can’t beat Kasparov.
Lay off it!
Anyway, this is a great list. Though, I /do/ think that Fischer should be a lot higher, maybe 2 or 3. (Kasparov /should/ be 1.)
November 22nd, 2009 at 5:05 am
(Not saying Vishy is completely bad, though. Maybe if it were a top 20 list.)
December 14th, 2009 at 2:30 pm
Very good list. Great to see a list from someone with knowledge of Chess history which is lacking in those screaming anand and racist. Pure stupidity and rubbish. Petrosian. Nimzowitch and others could be considered, but all in all a great list. Good to see kasparov solidly on top. Interesting to see fischer sixth. Id put him higher, maybe fourth or third. In ten years Carlsen will be high on this list, and anand will have been dethroned. The next dominating Champ will be Magnus.
December 14th, 2009 at 2:41 pm
Balaji, please don’t Get carried away w emotions. Magnus Carlsen is younger than anand, higher rated, and won 3 points ahead in the blitz wc. Why would one not expect him to dethrone anand in the near future? He is already setting every record possible. And your favoring of fischer over kaspy is based on nonsense. Kaspybis the most dominating force in Chess history. Fischer was a great talent, but never faced tough opposition year in and year out like garry.
January 29th, 2010 at 12:16 pm
They’ll be a top twenty women cheess player someday. You know, when there a women’s rock group named to the top hundred of all time.
Or, a team of women commandos.Or, a women NFL quarterback or major league pitcher.
You’ve come a long way baby, but, you still have a long way to go to actually be men.
January 30th, 2010 at 8:20 pm
we need a list of the best players who never made world champ. e.g.
Korchnoi and Keres