There is no doubt that throughout the history of chess there have been many superb players who have reshaped and redefined the way the game is played. This list is an attempt to examine and categorize the greatest of those. No doubt there are many worthy names that could be added, but here is the Top 10 who I believe have rightly earned their places as the greats. The criterion used is based upon a number of factors including dominance over contemporaries, length of career at the top, contributions to chess and individual flair and brilliance. Please note this is not a head to head of who would beat who, as most modern professional players would dominate the forefathers of yesteryear due to developments in Chess Theory, but a historical look at the greats.
It may seem odd to have a computer among the greatest chess players, but that’s exactly what this machine was designed to do, play chess. The rivalry between Kasparov and IBM began in 1989 but it wasn’t until May 11, 1997, that Deep Blue finally succeeded in defeating the then World Champion Garry Kasparov in a 6 game match. It won 2, lost 1 and had 3 draws after being defeated by Kasparov the previous year, though 1996 was the first year a computer actually won a game against a reigning World Champion. The win shocked the world, as it dawned upon us that we had succeeded in creating machines that could outthink us. Kasparov accused IBM of cheating, claiming IBM had chess players intervene during the match. IBM denied the allegations. Kasparov challenged them to a rematch, but IBM refused and dismantled Deep Blue. Nowadays, computers are regularly used by professional chess players as training partners and there are even World Championships for Chess Programs. It is that contribution that leads me to put Deep Blue on this list.
Many have claimed that Paul Morphy was the greatest chess player in history, and those claims could have been proven true had he actually pursued a career in chess. After teaching himself the game as a child by watching family members play, he was considered one of the best players in New Orleans by age 9. He famously played General Winfield Scott in 1846, who thought he was being made fun of when Morphy was introduced as his opponent. Morphy went on to easily defeat him in two games, the second of which was effectively over after only 6 moves. At age 12, he defeated the visiting Hungarian Master Johann Lowenthal in 3 matches, who initially viewed the match as a waste of time. In 1857, Morphy participated in the First American Chess Congress, which he won comfortably and was considered the champion of the United States. Too young to pursue his career in Law, Morphy travelled to Europe. By 1858, he had defeated all the English masters, except Staunton, who declined after seeing the young prodigy play. Next he travelled to France where he easily defeated the leading European player, Adolf Andersson, despite being very ill with intestinal influenza. He won 7, lost 2 and drew 2 and was by then considered the strongest player in the world, despite being only 21. Morphy returned home and retired from chess, only playing very occasional games. Had he pursued his career further, there is no doubt that Paul Morphy would be a contender for the number one spot. He was arguably the most gifted chess player to have ever lived, years ahead of his time in play and theory.
A lifelong Communist, Mikhail Botvinnik held the World Championship on and off for 15 years, from 1948 to 1963 when he was eventually defeated. Not only a great player, he made significant contributions to developing the World Chess Championship after WW2. He also coached some of the greats, including Anatoly Karpov, Garry Kasparov and Vladimir Kramnik. He learned chess at the age of 12 and within a year had won his school championships. In 1925, he defeated the great Capablanca in an exhibition game, though the Cuban was playing simultaneous matches. In 1931, at only 20, he became the Soviet Champion, scoring 13.5/20, no mean feat considering the enormous chess talent to come out of the nation. He then went on to tie a match with Flohr, considered the number one challenger for Alekhine’s World Championship crown. By the mid 1930’s, Botvinnik was holding his own against the greatest players in the world, finishing strongly in many tournaments. The outbreak of WW2 prevented him challenging Alekhine for World Champion in 1939. In the early 1940’s, he won the right to challenge Alekhine by defeating a strong Soviet field for the title of “Absolute Champion of USSR,” however it never eventuated with Alekhine’s death in 1946. He won the newly formatted title in 1948, with a score of 14/20 against 4 of the world’s best players. Botvinnik defended it in 1951 with a draw against David Bronstein, then again in 1954 with another draw against Smyslov, until his defeat in 1957 against the same opponent. He won a rematch in 1958, before losing the title again to Mikhail Tal in 1960, then winning the rematch in 1961. Finally he lost it for the final time in 1963 to Tigran Petrosian. He retired from competitive play in 1970, where he devoted himself to the development of computer chess programs and training young Soviet players.
Alexander Alekhine won his first World Championship by defeating the legendary Jose Capablanca in 1927. At the age of 16, he was already one of Russia’s strongest players and by age 22 was considered one of the strongest players in the world, winning most tournaments he played in throughout the 1920’s and was dominating tournament play by the early 1930’s. In 1921, he was granted permission to leave Russia for a visit to the West. He never returned. Alekhine’s biggest objective was winning the World Championship from Capablanca, though his largest challenge was raising the $10,000 stakes required for a successful challenge under the London rules. He gave exhibitions of simultaneous blindfold games to try and raise the stakes, but was eventually backed by Argentinean businessmen who financed his challenge in 1927. He defeated Capablanca with 6 wins, 3 losses and 25 draws, the longest ever World Championship match until 1984. The victory shocked the chess world (including Alekhine himself), considering he had never previously won a game against Capablanca. Negotiations for a rematch dragged out for years, and never eventuated. The two became bitter rivals. Alekhine dominated international chess for the next decade, until alcoholism resulted in a noticeable decline of his abilities. Alekhine successfully defended his title against Bogoljubov in 1929 and 1934, but lost the title to Euwe in 1935. He regained it in 1937 in a rematch and held it until his death in 1946, largely due to WW2 making international chess matches virtually impossible to organise. After WW2, he was not invited to tournaments due to his alleged Nazi affiliation, though evidence suggests this was largely pragmatic.
Another player who has claims to the greatest of all time, Bobby Fischer’s worst opponent was usually himself. Beginning at age 14, Fischer won 8 US Championships, including the 1963-64 Tournament 11-0, the only perfect score in its history. By 15, he was the youngest ever Grandmaster (GM) and the youngest ever candidate for the World Championship. By the early 1970’s, he was dominating his peers on the chess board, winning 20 consecutive matches in the 1970 Interzonal. By 1972, he had won the World Championship from Boris Spassky (his biggest rival) of the Soviet Union. Many viewed this match as an extension of the Cold War. In 1975, Fischer did not defend his title due to an inability to agree on conditions with FIDE, the International Chess Federation responsible for professional chess worldwide. He became a recluse and retired from international chess, with one exception in 1992, where he played Spassky again for a reported $5,000,000 purse. This event ultimately led to an arrest warrant being issued for Fischer and he never returned to the United States. In later years, Fischer came into further conflict with his own government, often publicly making anti-American and anti-Jewish statements. When his passport was eventually revoked and he was held in Japan for 9 months under threat of extradition, Iceland granted him citizenship, where he lived until his death 3 years later. No player before or since has had such a large margin between themselves and their rivals as Fischer did in the early 1970’s and had it not been for his constant demands over playing conditions and money in World Championship matches, and his relatively brief career, he too could have been a contender for the number one spot.
Jose Capablanca was World Champion from 1921-1927, and is often considered a candidate for the greatest player in history. He was also the undisputed master of Blitz Chess (5 minutes per side). He learned the rules by age 4, and at age 13 he narrowly defeated the Cuban champion. In 1906, aged 18, he crushed US champion Frank Marshall 15-8. In the San Sebastian 1911 tournament, he stunned the chess world by defeating an extremely strong field with 6 wins, 1 loss and 7 draws. He was now recognised as a serious contender for the World Title, held by Emanuel Lasker. He challenged Lasker, but refused to agree to 17 conditions placed on the match by the Champion, many of which favoured Lasker. Finally, in 1921, they agreed on terms and Capablanca won the Championship relatively easily without losing a game. He then set about formalizing the World Championship rules (known as the London rules) to which all the leading players agreed to. In 1922, he gave a simultaneous performance against 103 opponents, winning 102 and drawing 1. From 1916-1924, he lost only 34 serious games including a run of 63 games undefeated, an incredible feat. By 1927, Alexander Alekhine had finally come up with the $10,000 needed to challenge for the World Title. Capablanca was confident of victory, as he had never lost to Alekhine, however he was defeated and lost his title, never to regain it. They did not appear together in another tournament until 1936. After losing the title, Capablanca played in more tournaments, hoping to gain a rematch but he was past his peak form, which he claimed was 1919. Errors began to creep into his game, and he slowed down considerably. He retired from serious chess in 1931, however he returned in 1934, determined to regain the title. While he had some good successes and showed he was still a world class player, he never managed to secure another chance at the title.
Wilhelm Steinitz spent 8 years as the reigning World Champion (1886-1894), though some chess historians describe him as Champion from 1866 onwards, when he defeated Adolf Andersson. Steinitz rightly deserves his place on this list not only for his World Championships, but the contribution he made to the development of modern chess. In 1873 he unveiled a new style of positional play that sharply differed from the traditional method of all out attack, and many branded it cowardly. However, by the early 1890’s it was widely considered as superior and was being used by the next generation of players. By his early 20’s, Steinitz was playing chess professionally throughout Europe, and many branded him as the “Austrian Morphy.” He moved to London in 1862 and defeated all the leading players there. His breakthrough came in 1866, where he defeated Adolf Andersson, then considered the strongest active player in the world after the retirement of Morphy. Steinitz spent 30 years at the pinnacle of the chess world, a feat of longevity unmatched by any other player, though from 1873 to 1882 he only played one competitive match, against Blackburne, which he won 7-0. He returned to competitive chess in 1882, where he finished equal first in what was considered the strongest tournament ever held. In 1886, he played his bitter rival Zukertort for the “Championship of the World” After a shaky start where he was trailing 4-1, Steinitz finished brilliantly to take the crown 12.5/7.5. Over the next 8 years, Steinitz successfully defended his crown by defeating Gunsberg and Chigorin before finally losing it to Emanuel Lasker in 1894 and unsuccessfully challenging again in 1897. Not only did Steinitz contribute greatly to the development of modern chess, he also worked hard to standardize World Championship matches. Unfortunately, he died in poverty in 1900. A sad end to a great champion.
Emanuel Lasker dominated the chess world and spent an incredible 27 years as World Champion, the longest ever. He contributed greatly to chess becoming a professional career by demanding high fees for his appearances. He began to make his mark in 1889, winning several tournaments and in 1893 won 13/13 in a New York tournament, one of the few perfect scores amongst a strong field in history. By 1894, he had a chance to win the World Title from Steinitz, which he promptly proceeded to do with 10 wins, 5 losses and 4 draws. This began his 27 year reign as World Champion. His rivals criticized him for beating an old man and denounced his victory. Lasker responded by putting in even stronger tournament performances. He defended his title in 1907 against Marshall without losing a game and then in 1908 defeated his hated rival Tarrasch in another Championship defence with 8 wins, 5 draws and 3 losses. Tarrasch blamed his defeat on the wet weather. In 1910 it was first Schlechter (who narrowly lost) and then Janawski who challenged Lasker for the crown but they both failed and the latter didn’t win a single game. In 1911, Capablanca attempted to challenge Lasker, however the German put such stringent conditions on the game that Capablanca withdrew from negotiations. WW1 put an end to any further World Championship defences. He was finally defeated by Capablanca in 1921. He was 53 at the time, well past his prime and never played another serious match until 1934 when he took up Soviet citizenship. At age 66, he finished 3rd in a very strong field in Moscow. It was hailed as a “biological miracle.” Throughout his career he constantly finished ahead of Capablanca in tournaments, despite his World Championship loss in1921. While he did not contribute a great deal to chess other than his natural brilliance, longevity and bigger purses, many Russian masters cite him as a major influence in their playing style.
Were it not for our number one, Anatoly Karpov would certainly go down as the greatest player in history. He was World Champion from 1975-1985, then from 1993-1999 (disputed) and still plays competitive chess to this day (ranked 98). He has over 160 first place tournament finishes to his name. Karpov learned the game at age 4, and joined Botvinnik’s prestigious chess school aged 12 and by 15 was a Soviet National Master, the youngest ever (tied with Spassky). In 1969, Karpov won the World Junior Chess Championship with a score of 10/11. In 1974 he surprised everyone, including himself by defeating Korchnoi and Spassky for the right to challenge Fischer for the World Title. After negotiations broke down, Fischer resigned his crown and Karpov became Champion by default. He went on to win an incredible 9 consecutive tournament victories. He successfully defended his title against Korchnoi in 1978 with a narrow victory then did so again more convincingly in 1981. In the Chess Olympiads, he lost only 2 games out of 68 throughout his career. Karpov’s last successful title defence was against Garry Kasparov in 1984 in an epic 48 game match (5 wins, 3 losses, 40 draws). The match was terminated for the health of the players (Karpov had lost 10kg in 5 months.) He lost the title the following year to Kasparov. Karpov launched 3 unsuccessful challenges in the next 5 years, narrowly losing all 3 in one of the greatest rivalries the chess world has ever witnessed. Karpov controversially regained the title in 1993 when Kasparov split from FIDE and attempted to start his own chess federation. He went on to win the 1995 Linares tournament, widely considered the strongest tournament in history, with an impressive 11/13 score. His tournament Elo rating of 2985 is the highest of any player in the history of the game. Karpov defended his World Title against Kamsky in 1996 but conceded it in 1999 in protest over FIDE rule changes to the way the Title was decided. Since then, he has played little chess, instead concentrating his life on a political career.
No other player has dominated as long or as strong as Garry Kasparov. His name is synonymous with chess. He became the youngest ever undisputed World Champion in 1985 at only 22, which he held until 1993 when a dispute with FIDE led him to set up his own organisation (PCA) and technically lost him the World Title, though most chess enthusiasts still considered him the unofficial World Champion during this period. It lasted until his loss to Kramnik in 2000. He was ranked number one almost continuously from 1986 until his retirement in 2005, which included the all time highest Elo rating of 2851, as well as a record 15 consecutive tournament victories. Kasparov began training at Mikhail Botvinnik’s chess school at age 10. In 1979, he was accidently entered into a professional tournament despite being unrated, which he duly won and by 1983 was ranked 2 in the world, behind World Champion Karpov. He challenged for the World Title and lost to Karpov in 1984 in an epic 48 game match (see entry on Karpov) but won the following year and successfully defended it 3 times against Karpov in the coming years by very tight margins. In 1993, Kasparov had a falling out with governing body FIDE. In 2007, Kasparov admitted that forming a breakaway organisation was the worst mistake of his career. The Title remained split for 13 years as Kasparov refused to rejoin FIDE. He lost the title to Kramnik in 2000. Even after losing the title, Kasparov continued to outperform his rivals winning a string of major titles and remained ranked number 1. He announced his retirement in 2005 after winning the prestigious Linares tournament for the ninth time, citing a lack of personal goals in chess. He is now pursuing a political career in his native Russia. Garry Kasparov completely dominated his peers for 20 years, and retired on top. He has contributed much to the theory of chess and rightly deserves the number 1 spot of greatest ever.






























Deep Blue shouldn’t be on the list because it LOST to Kasparov. The machine that beat him was the next version called ‘Deeper Blue’.
For all you chess players who want a bit of a challenge try playing on a circular board, like the original game of chess.
where is viswanath anand??? really strange
@General Tits Von Chodehoffen (83): Hey! Women can be be as great as men in chess. You either hate women or a woman once beat you in chess & that you regret women who played chess for the rest of your puny little woman-hating life.
This list had me on the edge of my seat. Probably because I was falling asleep
Capablanca is #1 all the way. Then Lasker, then Fischer, then Kasparov, then Alekhine.
Hey…this list is all rubbish…!!!!
without Vishwanathan Ananad hw could anyone make
chess list???Before publishing a list, know all
facts and information about the game..!!!
I agree with most that Vishwanathan Anand deserves to be in the Top 10.
And Bobby Fischer ranked 6???
No other player dominated his peers like Fischer.
During his era, he was practically near-unbeatable.
He deserves the top spot, imho.
where the heck is anand ?!??!@?@#$@$@
Great list and well argued, you do know a thing or two about chess, something that can’t be said about most of the people commenting
I learned to play when I was 7; my dad taught me. When I was 12 he couldn’t beat me anymore. I played first board in high school. Love the game!
Anyone know how the recent match between Kasparaov and Karpov turned out?
kasparov 6 karpov 2 in blitz;3-1 in rapid;overall 9-3 as far as anand is concerned i think that he should be at no 6 or 7.he is not only a great classical chess player but also probably the greatest in rapid and advanced chess.he has won in mainz 15 times(nobody is going to come near that in the next 100 years for sure),5 corus titles(another record),3 linares and 3 dortmund.he has won the chess oscar 6 times (behind only karpov and kasparov).not only is he a great player but also the greatest gentleman the game has ever seen.judit polgar(the greatest woman chess player) has a career best ranking of 8 and has a catastrophic record against the top players and certainly doesnt feature in my top 50 list.fischer in my book is the greatest chess player for his sheer genius.he was the won who popularized chess and crushed his rivals (notably taimanov 6-0,larsen 6-0 in the 1971 candidates match).even kasparov once wrote that no one is ever going to show a superiority over his rivals comparable to fischer.his contributions to chess include opening theory,endgame,random chess,etc.he certainly was the most aggressive and greatest entertainer in chess history(refer to game of the century).my list is
1.fischer
2.capablanca
3.kasparov
4.tal
5.karpov
6.lasker
7.anand
8.kramnik
9.spassky
10.botvinik
and some idiot mentionined that carlsen will be slaughtering anand in 5 years time.i doubt that is going to happen.fischer rated anand as his favourite present generation player ahead of kasparov.kasparov is a rogue in the chess board who relies more on his rogue behaviour and mind game tactics rather than his skill.he was lucky to have received great chess education in the soviet chess school while anand is a self made player.karpov was lucky to be made champion in 1975 by default.had fischer agreed to play karpov would have been routed.i back fischer and capablanca to demolish the 2 k’s anyday.i never regard karpov as a world champion.fischer is the god of chess,not kasparov.
lot about you
keshav? Anand better than Kasparov are you joking? Do you not remember their 1on1 match, where Kasparov defeated VA by a significant margin? I think the list is fair, only champions that dominated during their time are included. VA did not dominate his time, except maybe last 2 years, and that is about to change with Magnus Carlsen. I would modify the top 3 players to: 1) Kasparov 2) Fischer 3) Capablanca
Oh my gosh, guys, seriously?
Vishy Anand?
He can’t beat Morphy.
Can’t beat Fischer.
Can’t beat Deep Blue.
Most definitely can’t beat Kasparov.
Lay off it!
Anyway, this is a great list. Though, I /do/ think that Fischer should be a lot higher, maybe 2 or 3. (Kasparov /should/ be 1.)
(Not saying Vishy is completely bad, though. Maybe if it were a top 20 list.)
Very good list. Great to see a list from someone with knowledge of Chess history which is lacking in those screaming anand and racist. Pure stupidity and rubbish. Petrosian. Nimzowitch and others could be considered, but all in all a great list. Good to see kasparov solidly on top. Interesting to see fischer sixth. Id put him higher, maybe fourth or third. In ten years Carlsen will be high on this list, and anand will have been dethroned. The next dominating Champ will be Magnus.
Balaji, please don’t Get carried away w emotions. Magnus Carlsen is younger than anand, higher rated, and won 3 points ahead in the blitz wc. Why would one not expect him to dethrone anand in the near future? He is already setting every record possible. And your favoring of fischer over kaspy is based on nonsense. Kaspybis the most dominating force in Chess history. Fischer was a great talent, but never faced tough opposition year in and year out like garry.
They’ll be a top twenty women cheess player someday. You know, when there a women’s rock group named to the top hundred of all time.
Or, a team of women commandos.Or, a women NFL quarterback or major league pitcher.
You’ve come a long way baby, but, you still have a long way to go to actually be men.
we need a list of the best players who never made world champ. e.g.
Korchnoi and Keres
For me Wesley So of the Philippines will be the next best player in the world.
While i personally cannot fathom the idea of sitting at a table for 3 horus contemplating my opponent’s next move with a little black tower, i do applaud those who can! Regardless of whether or not you’re “the GREATEST CHESS PLAYER” or not! Ah but this does bring back memories of when my brother taught me the game. My uncle is amazing at chess…I wish i had that patience!
Check-mate, katerina-out
Great list, although the computer is a little gimmicky and if you’re going for the gimmick you should include Judit Polgar as far and away the best woman of all time. Personally I would not have included either.
I assume the Anand vs Carlsen debate has been settled. I’ve been betting on Magnus for the past three years and it’s as clear now as then that he is the dominant player of his era. Anand is just a very good player that filled the gap between the Kasparov era and the Carlsen era. It’s absurd to even consider him for this list.
I think the bold move would be to drop the computer and put Magnus in at number 10 (with expectation to rise), but otherwise this is an excellent list.
“It’s absurd to even consider him for this list. ”
I pity u!
why is it TAL not included?
anand is the first player in chess history to have won the World Championship in three different formats:
Knockout,
Tournament,
and Match.
He is also one of the fastest player ever (In most tournament time control games that Anand plays, he has more time left than his opponent at the end of the game. He lost on time in one game, to Gata Kamsky.).
he deserves to be on TOP10
Hello, # 1 is actually Armenian living in Russia.
hard list.. but I would find a way to add Tal and Korchoi, as well….
After the latest world championship 2010 (please watch the last game) Anand need to be added in this top list..and need Tal also..
Magnus have proved again and again he’s worthy
of a champion. Unless he’s having mental breakdown
he wil dethrone anyone in sight within five years or less.
If the criteria is influence, Anand has also created a great impact in last 20 years, particularly in India and non-Russian countries.
Having been No-2 to the alltime No-1 is not a discredit either. In chess history great players come, dominate and then another great young player takes over. Anand is the worthy successor to Kasporov. And Magnus will take over from Anand in a couple of years, that is true.
As rightly said, Anand has won through every format, including blindfold and advanced chess, is the greatest rapid player, most apolitical player, always won on the basis of his merit. He came from a country which did not have any pedegree in chess at that time. Once Anand own a gruelling knokout tourney and starightway had to face an well rested and fresh karpov for an world title. Anand lost narrowly, does it mean Karpov dominated Anand?
Remember Anand’s demolition of Karmnik in 2008? Is it not total dominance? That Anand did not dominate his contemporaries is also wrong.
lol… No Vis Anand???
Most of the list in listverse is biased / provide wrong information / US based. This list prove the same.
This site is surely not international. It must change it’s name to ListverseUS.com
The highest ELO rating ever was 2851 by Kasparov.. karpov never attained that…please be accurate.
Take a look at this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methods_for_comparin…
and you will see that Anand shows up maybe once in a top ten list, and that is based on elo which inflates over time. Also there are no women on this list. Men's minds just tend to be more single focused while women are better at multitasking. Maybe this causes women problems in chess, or maybe there are just not enough women interested in chess to make an impact on the top players. Either way this list is neither *****ist or racist when compared to other lists.
stupid list.. wheres V Anand?
only americans and europeans here
There is a a lot of validity in the criteria you used in determining the order of rank of the top 10 players in the history of chess. There is on criterion that you did not use and perhaps should be the most important one. That is “natural or intuitive ability”. Here, in the opinion of respected chess authorities, Capablanca had no equal. As you should know, he never or rarely prepared for matches, knew little about chess openings or theory as compared to his contemporaries, and did not even own a chess set at home. Despite this, during his peak he was able to beat his adversaries with relative ease. No wonder he was dubbed the “Chess Machine”. The above overconfidence in his natural ability to easily beat opponents led to his defeat by Alekine in 1927. In a rematch, Capablanca would have prepared well and defeat Alekine. Overall, Capablanca was still the better player. I believe that Alekine purposely avoided a rematch. He knew that he would not defeat a well prepared Capablanca.
another case of overrating past legends just to remember them
Anand stil the best, Indian invented the game…CHESS
For a long time, women simply didn't play the game. It's hardly surprising that they haven't produced better players before this. But that's about to change.
Anand is great, but doesn't belong on the list. Yet. Same with Carlsen.
A great many things have been discovered about chess. There arre better moves on both offense and defense that the earlier players didn't know. The Fishing Pole Trap has destroyed the favorite game of many players. There are lots of other traps in the opening which are weell-known to a lot ofamateuirs but would have come as a total surprise to past masters.
And it's important to realize that a list on the same topic in 12 years won't include some of these geniuses. They will have to go to make room for the new crop of masters. We live in an age of 9-year-old Grandmasters who may so totally dominate the game that we will refer to those on this list as "pre-chess masters."
Finally, I know Fischer's story and I deplore his later choices as much as anyone. But he should be judged on his chess play alone. I've played over the greatest games of about every human player on this list and Fischer played the deepest and best chess of any of them. Setting aside his personal opinions and actions, Fischer was simply the best and should have been Number One.
One reply- GARY KASPAROV- Thats all folks,thats why his nuber ONE
kasparov is undoubtedly the best but dont you think anand should have a place in the list above?!
You peole around the world and everywhere else, GARY KASPAROV is the name of chess as we know it. I'me still waiting for a rematch: IBM vs.KASPAROV and ibm it's not nice to cheat,It is wrong.
I fully support you bud
got to agree with Benmark
top 10 should have been
10 – Tal
9 – Botvinnik
8 – Kramnik
7 – Lasker
6 – Karpov
5- Anand
4 – Kasparov
3 – Morphy
2 – Capablanca
1 – Alekhine
you forgot ficher
B……*****! Bobby Fischer can dispose all of them.
i agree with Nydrre
just because Anand is the current world champion doesn’t mean he’s one of the greatest of ALL TIME.
really good list; i’d put Morphy higher, however.
lol No Vishy Anand?
He already won the Fide World championship 4 times just as much as Garry did, and also he did beat both Kramnik and Topalov both of them who beat Kasparov!
If Kasparov faces Anand right now, Anand would slaughter him, even Kasparov said it will be difficult facing him, the psychological barrier is gone…
You better change the list as of Anand as of 2010… Anand still retained the World championship under the harshest conditions in Bulgaria, Veselin Topalov and his Team – the dude who beat Kasparov, and even overtook him on the ratings list with an elo of 2813 before Kasparov retired.
Also he beat Kramnik, whom Kaparov lost miserably as he couldn't even score a victory in that match! While Anand completely dominated Kramnik with a 2 point lead!
Also Anand is the only one to win World championship in all the format, knockout, rapid, blitz, tournament, match – the most VERSATILE World Champion ever in Chess History.
He has also won the Chess Oscar 6 times, and is the greatest gentlemen anyone has ever seen. Also unlike Kasparov who was made raised to be a chess-athlete in Mikhail Botvinnik, Anand had no scientific training, and came from a family which had no chess background, yet that didn't stop him from being the Legend as he is right now! He is a NATURAL GENIUS!
Whatever your retarded list says, Vishy Anand is No.1 in my book.
RUSSIAN IS HERO I LIKE RUSSIAN
AND RUSSIAN BEST PLAYER IN THE GAME OF CHESS
I LIKE KASPAROV AND KARPOV GAME.
Really ???,then why is it the chess champion today is not a russian?
But good work.
It´s great to see deep blue, morphy and Botvinnik.
Well done.
Deep Blue here must be a joke,it's just a very powerfull hardware which did nothing for chess history. It just works as a shock,you know,like when you hear some kids saying "Hey,did you know that one of the greatest chess players of all time is a computer?".And of course,they know almost nothing about chess!
Real players contribute to chess theory and beauty,they come up with something new in openings,middlegame and endgame+humans have intuition,something that you'll never see in a computer. Check Mikhail Tal, Tigran Petrosian or Vishwanathan Anand,they did much much more then Deep Blue.
Fischer should've been No. 1…. just sayin'
I agree, and in a chess match theere’s no way kasparov and karpov can win against him,period.
i m indian but i like russian chess player and russian deffence
and really russian chess player legend in the chess history i like
garry kasparov and botvinnik game so i love Russia
Bobby Fischer is the best no question ask.
For those who debate Anand’s contribution to the chess world, I have one thing to say. BLITZ. None of the top 10 grandmasters named in this article would come anywhere close to Anand in blitz games. Secondly Anand was declared a child prodigy in chess much earlier than others. In his prime he had very much overtaken others and has already regained the world championship. Most important he came not from the traditional Russian school but sort of developed his talent inhouse.
Interesting list. What surprised me the most was founding Lasker at the number three spot, although no doubt he must be placed in the top ten of all time for being world champion during 27 years. Steinitz too, his contributions for modern chess are remarkable but he gained much of that by, i think, studyin Morphy games and understanding their depths behind his play for the first time , so i would put Morphy ahead of him, but don´t get me wrong he is the first world champion and put more work on chess that Morphy did.
In my humble opinion the top 5 are:
1.- José Raúl Capablanca.
2.- Robert James Fischer.
3.- Garry Kasparov.
4.- Tigran Petrosian.
5.- Anatoly Karpov.
Sorry for my english.
you guys just watch soon they will be making a list about a person named Jalon Flores (me) i am only 12 and i am a pro at chess
oh yeah?
You have omitted the name of Viswanatha Anand!!!!
Yeah all the proof, is here, When Ibm, started making its chess computer, I believe they where shocked by the results that it performed, and was kept secret, the Russians /who trained Garry probably others but Garry Ability to remember more gave him the opportunity to learn and be taught the secrets the computer discovered. So Garry was th e one to show the world this, and to take the image of the greatest Chess player, in history, Cause of Russia embarrassment to Bobby Fischer, and showed the world how chess was to be played, maybe the first finding of chess where founded early then this say around the late 70ties, and once you learn one thing you really cant adapt to learn anymore, this is known so this is where Kasparov came in, then once computers where more advance in calculating and faster, like when deep blue came along, and showed once again there was more to chess the finale step in chess, and other started learning this and being taught this and Garry Kasparov had a hard time competing and losing more and more, like the saying you cant train a dog to learn more than they know, so Garry Kasparov retired, what a chicken, So to me Kasparov was a fake, design to restore Russia shame, We as people came be fooled by the tricks of other people and lies and easily be manipulated to shams like this, if we are to look closely we can see that something is up, and that after Fischer, computers found the new way of chess, And away to Restore Russia shame, or for other reasons that Fischer not to go down as the greatest, in history, Cause he is the greatest player to ever play the game. through the years they kept downing Fischer and worked on ruining his name, people will read this and have there own opinion on this and bash me ole well, Where the proof you say. lol I don’t need it, if you are smart you see that this makes sense, So after Fischer Computer open the door, that it, The was no other human at Fischer understanding, till computers changed that in the late 70ties and again just be for Kasparov came about, and the knowledge was passed to him. Thanks
One more thing. Fischer in 6 spot, Wow, He Surpassed them all be for he changed chess, and computers for the newer modern age of chess,
it’s a hard work
-cyril
I truly have no nationalistic prejudices. I love Russians, Germans, Austrians, Americans, etc. I have played over games of all of these champions. They have all played some beautiful and exciting games. But none of them has ever left an impression on me as has PAUL MORPHY. I know, people will say Morphy’s opponents were weak. Yes, but if one examines Morphy’s games, considers how young he was, etc., they will find that the degree of tactical immagination was mindboggling. Then when it became neccessary , as in his games against strong positional players, De Reverie, Boden, etc. he rose to the occasion. They had nothing on him either. PAUL MORPHY, to my mind at least, would defeat any player in modern times, had he the chance to study theory, etc. He was acknowledged to have a near photographic memory.
Forgive me one last comment on Morphy. As Fischer himself said, Morphy had complete sight of the board, and never blundered. HE WOULD DEFEAT THEM ALL!!!