They came from all sections of society. Some were musicians, others politicians and some others were just commuters on a bus. From a cellist in Bosnia to an Atlanta preacher via a Vietnamese monk, we select protests which have shaped the public imagination…
‘The way they are treating my people in the South’, said Louis Armstrong,’ the government can go to hell.’ The virtuoso trumpeter was asked to go to the Soviet Union as a goodwill ambassador, representing the United States in an effort to showcase the truly American art form. Infuriated at the thought of being the flag bearer of a country which did not treat his people as equal citizens, (the events at Little Rock did not impress him too much, especially President Eisenhower’s apathy) smiling Satchmo refused to go. He then continued to do what he did so marvelously-bring joy to millions worldwide.
It is one of the most brilliant expressions of discontent. In a stinging rebuke of the idea that present time was not right for civil transformation, Dr King drew on his theological education and corroborated his arguments with astute political thought. ’Actually, time itself is neutral; it can be used either destructively or constructively. More and more I feel that the people of ill will have used time much more effectively than have the people of good will’, he said in perhaps the most important defense of nonviolent demonstration- a landmark achievement in the civil rights movement for equality and justice.
Its rather impossible to explain courage, but we know it when we see. Because if a man does not take antiretroviral injections until four million of his fellow South Africans have access to the same, it exemplifies the moral rectitude of the man. And no, we are not talking about some common cold here. Zackie Achmat, the HIV positive campaigner is said to have said about his actions:”I don’t think it’s noble, I think it’s dumb. But it’s a conscience issue. It’s not something I advocate for anyone else.” But the man is no novice at protest. At the tender age of fourteen, he tried to set his Soweto school on fire in opposition to the Apartheid government. Zackie Achmat proved that protests do not have to belong to everybody. Sometimes, a few is enough.
Yes, they blast it out from the chai shops in Kathmandu. Yuppies in Rhode Island and Maine can sing it verbatim and it is requested at karaoke bars in Tokyo and Nagoya, but its the universal appeal of the song-a rallying cry for all those beleaguered souls to shake off that slumber and take action against injustice that has stirred the souls of people worldwide. What was most remarkable about the dreadlocked reggae artist from Jamaica was the emotions he could engender in the hearts and minds of people by just being himself. The words were simple, but the meaning attached was as profound as ever-an antidote for pain as he later called it. Years later, Amnesty International declared it as their battle cry and it plays in the heads of students in Tehran and Beijing, sans the Jamaican twang, of course.
Before Dr King there was Gandhi and before Gandhi was Henry Thoreau. ”I cannot for an instant recognize that political organization as my government which is the slave’s government also”, he said in his defense for refusing to pay poll tax. And thus in Concord, Massachusetts a tool was invented which was to deliver independence to India and Pakistan, break down segregation in the United States and dismantle apartheid in South Africa. Thoreau gave voice to the idea of non conformity-the idea that every moral being by nature does not belong to a party, and thus had the power to rebel- and most importantly, on his or her own terms.
In the midst of the siege on his beloved Sarajevo, Vedran Smailovic played his cello for 22 days-one day for each person killed when they waited for bread. The picture of this 36 year old cellist- dressed in garb suitable for a night out at the opera in the midst of rubble is as poignant as they come. No, it didn’t change the outcome of the war- Serb snipers ravaged Sarajevo incessantly for days before a ceasefire was established-but his emotional defiance was a tribute to all those nameless souls who suffer endlessly but always with dignity.
He walked for 240 miles, never wavering in the quest. Crowds followed the ‘half naked fakir’ -it was worth it if he could somehow conjure up the independence they deserved. ‘I want world sympathy in this battle of Right against Might’, he declared to the New York Times on his way to the coast. He arrived on April 5th, 1930 at that now hallowed site of Dandi in his home state of Gujarat, raised a lump of salty mud and said, “With this, I am shaking the foundations of the British Empire.” Seventeen years later, the edifice came crashing down.
How far can one go to take a stand? Apparently, far enough to the point of self-immolation. In protest against the persecution of Buddhists by the Ngô Đình Diệm government, Thích Quảng Đức immolated himself in the presence of his fellow practitioners. “I was to see that sight again, but once was enough. Flames were coming from a human being; his body was slowly withering and shriveling up, his head blackening and charring. In the air was the smell of burning human flesh; human beings burn surprisingly quickly. Behind me I could hear the sobbing of the Vietnamese who were now gathering. I was too shocked to cry, too confused to take notes or ask questions, too bewildered to even think… As he burned he never moved a muscle, never uttered a sound, his outward composure in sharp contrast to the wailing people around him”, wrote David Halberstam, on witnessing the event. JFK called it the most important news picture in history. And to think it was through the sacrifice of a simple Buddhist monk…
The year was 1955. Tired of giving in, Rosa Louise McCauley Parks refused to budge from her seat when asked to give it up for a white passenger on a winters day in Montgomery, Alabama. From that moment on, she was thrust into the spotlight as an example of courage and dignity and became the “Mother of the Modern-Day Civil Rights Movement.” Decorated several times during her life for the moral integrity she showed on that December day, Rosa Parks rose from simple civil servant in the NAACP to personify the ideal that all men are created equal. We are told to stand up for for our rights-the pint sized black woman did exactly that, albeit by sitting down.
Nameless and faceless he emerged from obscurity, a single soul against the might of the Peoples Republic of China while its leaders were reviewing the crisis in the Great Hall. It is in the midst of protest that he showed the world the power of one as he maneuvered his body with the tanks and picked up an altercation with the soldier. Its the most enduring image of protest of our times-raw effrontery in the face of tyranny-a single man whose courage lasted five minutes more. Some say he came in from the villages. Others said he was a Beijing resident. It didn’t matter. He will be forever remembered as the ‘Tank man.’






























Where’s the burning monk?
I salute the freedom fighters of history. I wish I could think of some amazing way to fight the injustices I see. I suppose I’m too fat and lazy.
Rosa Parks is above MLK and Ghandi?
#5 I have had many Bosnian refugees with the saddest stories. One boy(Mirza) couldnt even speak or write his name. 8th grade. He did nothing but shake. He saw his father beheaded. Amin lost his leg when he stepped on a bomb. Climbed 60 stairs 5 times a day all year (my school doesnt have an elevator). Pictures drawn of women with their breasts cut off, people buried in mass graves. I have hundreds of stories. One for each child whether Bosnian, Croatian or Serbian. Its the children who suffer. So many many sad stories.
great list, after a long time!
what about when Twisted Sister sang “We’re Not Gonna Take It” ?
@Vera Lynn (126): Hey stop that, it’s real depressing stuff.. I wonder how deeply people get affected by such incidents, an indelible scar for life- whole life haunted by horrible memories..hoooo
Fantastic List, Dash
Keep it up
<3.
@atheists eat fish (121): I had not heard of Rachel Corrie. Tragic story. I’m grateful for another chance to learn about woman who’ve taken a stand for their beliefs. You’ve inspired me to also research this topic.
@Jay (125): No where on this list does it say that it is a “top ten” or that they are in any particular order of ranking. You seem to be yet another person to pile on the “let’s attack Rosa Parks” bandwagon. I just don’t get why this happens.
@Randall (55):
Interesting opinion but unfortunately you are slightly off. There is more evidence that “Jesus” was a number of people spreading teachings that turned into Christianity.
There is some debate over how long this group (of what is agreed upon to be approximately 8-10 people) took to really put the spark to the tinder but the evidence is that a GROUP existed NOT an INDIVIDUAL.
I have read this theory in some detail within the works of the scholars the History and Theological Departments of Yale. Thus I am more than happy with the accuracy of this.
Nice try and almost correct but please try to be a little more precise when referring to such matters.
Thanks, it is appreciated.
Regards
Michael
hello people, ive got requests to comment-what are you guys looking for me to comment on?
@Michael (133): Hahaha telling Randall to be more precise. He must be busy grading papers or some-such. I suggest you get ready to provide your sources. I do call bull***** btw – I’ve not read one scholarly article that denies the existence of Jesus. The man – his divinity is a whole ‘nother ball game.
@Michael (133):
Don’t ***** with me, Michael… you have NO idea to whom you’re talking to.
To begin with, the historicity of Jesus as an individual is NOT my “opinion,” it the accepted paradigm of the vast majority of scholars and historians going back to at least the Middle Ages.
Next, there is not “more” evidence that Jesus was multiple individuals. THAT statement, on your part, was pure hyperbole, and, quite frankly, bull*****.
The CONGRUENT evidence that Jesus was a real person–ONE real person–has been accepted for centuries. Indeed, the Romans and Hebrews THEMSELVES accepted it, and generally without question.
And the reason for this is is that it would have been nearly as impossibly difficult, in the Classical world, to just “invent” a person out of whole cloth–or to merge several *real* people into one fanciful person–as it would be TODAY. People then were no less intelligent, and the Classical world, while not connected with such thoroughness and redundancy as ours is in terms of communication, was nevertheless one in which information flowed readily and fairly rapidly (relatively speaking). In this environment, Jesus is spoken of and written about only a few paltry years after his death. And not only that–spoken of and written about with total acceptance that he WAS a real individual. There is NO WAY that could have happened if he had NOT been a real person. It would have required a conspiracy of not only monumental proportion (as most silly conspiracy theories WOULD require) but the acquiesence of those who had NO REASON to blithely accept or support the reality of Jesus as an historical figure—but they in fact DID accept his historicity.
There were untold numbers of people who were still alive when Jesus was being written about and talked of, after his death—yet we have NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that ANYONE ever spoke up to say, “wait a second—that guy never existed!” Not ONE person, scholar, sage, Roman officer or imperial representative EVER says a word to this effect. And SURELY they would have if, after only a few years, people were trying to *create* such a figure, or merge several unrelated people together INTO such a figure.
This has been the historical MAINSTREAM conclusion on Jesus, therefore, since DAY ONE when consideration of his historicity was ever approached. And it has been the conclusion EVEN OF THOSE who have no vested interest in an historical Jesus.
Interestingly, you don’t bring up ONE SHRED of this so-called “evidence” that Jesus was “8-10 people,” you only offer it up as authority and expect me and everyone else here to accept it.
Of further note to me—and I think this is telling—you mention the History and Theological Departments of Yale… as though there was some general consensus in this department that Jesus was an amalgam of several individuals.
AND YET… I cannot find a SINGLE reference to this online, nor any other references related to Yale, except the usual scholarly tomes that already exist or are currently going to print which talk about Jesus as a real individual. Moreover, I myself (having been a trained historian, specializing in Ancient History, and currently working at a major university, myself) am more than familiar with the “buzz-talk” that goes around history circles when this kind of thing comes up—and you would expect such talk in VOLUME if a big part of the history department of Yale had come to the conclusion that Jesus never actually existed. BUT… needless to say, I have not heard ONE SUCH THING to this effect.
Now, I’m sure it’s possible you read something, from someone, who is connected to Yale–I will defer for the moment on the possible point that you were simply lying. But I have little doubt that you have mischaracterized it and exaggerated it, and in support of this opinion, I again point out your utter failure to CITE any of the works or scholars whom you have only nebulously referred to.
Lastly Michael, don’t ever try to palm off a “nice try” on me. I don’t open my mouth around here unless I KNOW what I’m talking about, and without support to back me up. As for precision, in trying to blithely and backhandedly get us to believe that the scholarly paradigm around Jesus has suddenly turned and done a near-180, and is now assuming him to have been a fabricated alloy… YOU are the one who is speaking as imprecisely as one could possibly speak.
@mom424 (135):
Thanks mom. Grades, in fact, were due yesterday at 5pm sharp. I got all mine done by 3.30pm. For that monumental effort, I allowed myself the luxury of immediately abandoning the office for a drink with comrades at a local pub, despite the remaining Sears Tower of paperwork that still sits on my desk.
Hi all,
Pretty good list today, has at least stired a bit of debate.
@Michael (133) (re: Zeitgeist): It’s been quite a while since I saw that movie, so I can’t remember the detail only the bullet points. From what I gather, the movie suggested that quite a few attributes were bestowed on JC which have been similarly bestowed on others throughout ancient history to mark some kind of divinity. It reminds me of the Life of Brian quote which goes something like… “I should know Saviour, I’ve followed a few.” I personally believe JC did exist because so many unrelated onlookers from that period can’t be all wrong, and that the stories and layers of mythology have come later to prove he was something/anything more than just a man – which he was.
@dash (134): I loved your list and found it to be very moving.
I’m not sure what they may want you to comment on, but my guess would be some of the controversial topics that this list has inspired. For example the ‘is Jesus real or fiction; God or man discussions, or why did you omit so and so; or include so and so? Just my guess as to what they may be looking for.
It never ceases to amaze how almost every list seems to inspire such intense debate. And every debate seems to include the same topics such as religion, homo*****uality, abortion, etc. regardless of whether or not they have anything to do with the original list.
@Iakhovas (122): Don’t worry, back in the days, there was also a bunch of hypocrites, people that were in it just to break the windows of a store to get a radio or some records, some stupid teenagers that were addicted to the adrenalin rush you get when you fight the police, some other that planted bombs… And a lot of honest people fighting with democratic and peaceful weapons for peace and justice. People that was arrested, beaten and sometimes murdered. Just as today, actually. Only that it might be a tad less violent nowadays.
@Moonbeam (139): It is known and acknowledged that all lists tend to be controversial.Because a list by nature is exclusive, it will lead to strong reactions from those left out.As for questions on morality-i think racism is wrong, tyranny cannot persist and every person deserves the right to healthcare and education.We can haggle endlessly over other things but these values are non-negotiable. It is through this spectrum that I write.
Avi – are you kidding????? I am a white woman and I think that what Rosa Parks did was amazingly brave. You don’t have to kill yourself or be involved in violence to make a stand against injustice. Do you have any idea how blacks were treated in those days? She had to be very brave to stand up for what she believed in. It may just have been a seat on the bus but sometimes it is one little step at a time to change things and she helped get the ball rolling.
I have to assume that all you people who don’t believe in Jesus won’t be celebrating Christmas this year.
Otherwise, you would look like *****s.
Merry CHRISTmas everyone!
@archiealt (90):
“How’s being a Christian working for you?”
Ask us when we are all dead.
lists like this are why i go to this site
@Luv4Tahoe (143):
Nothing wrong with keeping the traditions but losing the Fairy Tales. I point you towards Halloween or Valentines Day, two very secular holidays which have roots in various Religions.
So no, it would not make you look like an ***** if you celebrated Christmas without being religious.
You however do look like an *****, because you believe in nonsense. Have fun praying to nobody.
Oh and @Randall,
‘Don’t ***** with me, Michael… you have NO idea to whom you’re talking to.’
*****ing hell mate….you’re still such a God damn loser.
@Luv4Tahoe (143): I have to assume that all you people who don’t believe in Jesus won’t be celebrating Christmas this year. Otherwise, you would look like *****s.
You assume incorrectly. I don’t fancy myself as a “religious person”, but I greatly enjoy the secular aspects of the holiday season – getting together with family and friends, sharing great food and assorted snacks and goodies, gift-giving and putting smiles on my kids’ faces, the decorations, etc. Gee, I’m all broken up over the fact that you think this makes me look like an *****. Feeling a little prideful about “your” holiday, are you? You sanctimonious *****. WWJD?
@archiealt (146):
And ***** you, *****.
And as I’ve said before here–do NOT speak to me, do NOT refer to me. Is that clear?
Well,well,well…..Big mouth ass Randall still talking ***** he can’t back up.
@TomCat (149): I think you missed the part where he…. BACKED IT UP. I’ve had my disagreements with Randall in the past, and one thing you can be sure of is that he knows what the ***** he is talking about.
Oh and by the way, TomCat, your name sounds like the lazy moniker of a transgendered and confused person.
Crispin…..you sound like Randalls *****.
@TomCat (151): That’s the problem with Randall’s arguments – they’re near impossible to refute point by point – so people resort to foolish sweeping statements/insults. And I’m nobody’s *****.
@TomCat (149):
And just what, precisely, prick, do you feel it is that I “can’t back up?”
@Randall (148):
Oh I try mate, I really do. You say and do so much stupid stuff that just goes by without anything being said, but c’mon…
‘Don’t ***** with me, Michael… you have NO idea to whom you’re talking to.’
You can’t say something as ridiculous as that without somebody pointing out what a fool you are.
@archiealt (154):
AND AGAIN, FOR THE LAST TIME…
***** you, you little *****. Your opinion doesn’t interest me in the least, and I’d be willing to bet that no one ELSE here cares about either.
You have ZERO *****ing sense of humor; you don’t strike me at all as particularly intelligent yourself, and offer little or nothing to this site… and I think there’s more than just a handful of people here who can’t stand you. And again, I am SICK of this WEIRD *****ing obsession with me where you feel it’s necessary to show up on every other thread I contribute to, offering up your worthless (and irrelevant) opinions about me.
The fact that you can’t stop says a lot about you, and frankly I find it sickening and disturbing.
@dash (141): I’m glad you responded to my post. When you said: “i think racism is wrong, tyranny cannot persist and every person deserves the right to healthcare and education” your sentiments were well written and meaningful. You sound like someone I would like to know.
@Luv4Tahoe (143): I have to assume that all you people who don’t believe in Jesus won’t be celebrating Christmas this year. Otherwise, you would look like *****s.
Lol, if you mean by celebrating Christmas as in celebrating Christ’s Mass and the solely Christian traditions such as attending Midnight mass, Misa de Gallo (nine day dawn masses), All-Night Vigil on Christmas Eve… If we did celebrate these things, then yes, we nonbelievers would look like the *****s instead, Luv4Tahoe.
However, if you’re talking about traditions like caroling, parades, yule log, gift giving, tree decorating… in short, traditions that are very much considered secular…Well these started BEFORE Christianity so you can’t exactly lay claim to *everything* this holiday season.
[sarcasm] You’ve made me ashamed of my non-Christian Christmas. [/sarcasm]
Merry Christmas to you, Luv4Tahoe. Feel free to continue your personal Christian Christmas tradition of attempting to bogart this festive season while the rest of us – Christian and nonChristians alike – continue our own tradition of spreading joy and happiness to those around us.
A treat for those of you actually interested in this fine list Dash put together:
This is a Joan Baez music video called “Stones in the Road.” Not only was it real footage of her visit to Sarajevo but around the 2:53 mark you see and hear Vedran Smailovic playing his cello.
@Randall (155):
God love you Randall. Sometimes you do bring a smile to my face.
Randall made me laugh with his toff´s error in the first line of comment 136. You sound more stupid than if you´d just ended the sentence with a preposition and been done with it.
And PLEASE stop SHOUTING at us all with your very BIG LETTERS every now and then. Why do I get the impression that you are the kind of person, if I were to get into a spoken debate with you, who would talk over me as soon as I said something you didn´t like. Or should that be “whom” would talk over me… Please help me Randall, I´m just so confused with my grammar and I need a super intelligent man like you to explain all its intricacies.
Anyway, I really liked this list. Despite there being others who also deserved places on the list, and despite quibbles over the order of these entries, I don´t think anyone can deny that all of these people were inspirational. Well, these actions all a lot more courageous, righteous and admirable than anything I´ve ever done, anyway.
@gabi319 (157):
*EDIT* Smailovic plays on his own at the 3:53 mark.
@TomCat (151): I picture you as a transvestite, TomCat. A gaunt, crack-addled, filthy gutter ***** begging to jabber my jobbie.
Peter Tosh of Bob Marley and The Wailers wrote and sang Get Up, Stand Up.
@Moonbeam (156): @Moonbeam (156): Hi moonbeam,thank you.I’d like to get to know u as well.
The boy from troy (129) Thank you for responding. It is depressing and sad. But people have to know it was no different that what happened in Rwanda or WW2 And yes I know the significance of that. I am a Jew, and we lost many family members during that terrible war. The whole motto is “Never again” but it has happened again and will happen again. Too *****in sad. We as a people will never learn.
Moonbeam and Dash (163) Go for it. MPW and I have been together for a year and a half. Ive never been happier. Life is funny. Take advantage of opportunities.
At the risk of being called Randall’s *****, I’d have to agree with him on this one. You can screw with the guy, but you can’t screw with his evidence. He can be a know-it-all at times, but at least he backs it up. Can’t say the same for his detractors.
Regarding Randall, Michael etc….I’ve just recently seen a Discovery Channel program called “Who was Jesus?” University of Illinois at Chicago professor Rachel Havrelock was asked if there was any direct evidence for Jesus’ existence outside of the Bible?
Here is what she said:
Josephus, a first century Jewish historian, wrote of Jesus in the Greek version of the Antiquities of the Jews. He described Jesus as a “wise man” and a “doer of wonderful works.” The fact that Josephus referenced Jesus reveals that stories about Jesus were already gaining momentum.
It is really kind of ridiculous thinking Jesus was not an individual or never existed.
Randall,
Again, please try to be precise and please make an effort not to ramble. I expect a well considered reply to contain a reference or two, of which you have offered none.
I have offered up a great learning institution such as Yale while you, none. I am more than satisfied with their studies and continue to agree with their explanations.
Your efforts are appreciated however and we enjoyed your reply.
Regards
Michael
Great list Dash, really enjoyed it! I did expect to find Jan Palach on it, but that is how it is with all lists, they are subjective. I don’t really understand Rosa Park being that high on the list, but mabye it is difficult to understand the whole context as a non-american?
But awesome list, the tank man brings tears to my eyes!
@Michael (168):
Now I can say “nice try” to YOU, Michael. MENTIONING Yale does not make for a reference. CITE by name the scholars you’re referring to. You’ve had two opportunities to do that and yet have failed to do so both times. That further raises my suspicions that you are merely making the whole damn thing up.
@Chanchita (159):
I hate to tell you Chanchita, but I believe my grammar was correct in that opening line. If you’d like to dispute that, go ahead. (But if it should happen to turn out that I was incorrect–and again, I don’t think I was–oh well. If you think one grammatical slip-up actually proves me to be “stupid,” I think your bias would be showing… badly).
It always interests me that when people don’t like something I’ve said, they attack the WAY I said it, or they attack me.
I don’t care if you dislike caps, Canchita. I use them for *emphasis,* not to give the appearance of shouting. A whole sentence or paragraph of caps would be shouting. Not merely one word capitalized. But I suppose that’s a matter of interpretation. In any case, you don’t have to read my comments. If you don’t like them, skip over them, and then keep your mouth shut. Complaints of your type contribute NOTHING to the discussion—they merely detract from it and waste time.
@FromtheWest (162):
Actually “Get Up Stand Up” was written by Peter Tosh AND Bob Marley. Peter Tosh sang lead on one verse and backup on the rest while Marley sang lead for almost the whole song.
I do think Tosh’s verse was the strongest in the song, though.
@Chanchita (159):
Whom should only be used to signify something in the object position. Thus, “whom would talk over me” is incorrect while “whom he would talk over” would be correct. You probably don’t care, though.
@Vera Lynn (165): Thanks for the lovely thought, but I’m married. I’m sure Dash could do much better than the likes of me! Plus I’m a woman but I’m not aware of Dash’s gender. I just admire this list it’s beautiful and touching, and I respected Dash’s well expressed sentiments about injustice.
Did you and MPW meet through Listverse? I wonder how jfrater feels knowing his site may be bringing people together. Very sweet.
Although this site also drives people against each other as in the frequent discord that arises among those that add comments here. – On second thought it’s not really this website that drives people into disputes, but people’s passionate and strongly held and expressed beliefs, I supose.
Half of these people are whiny little children if you ask me.
Moonbeam (174) Yes we met here. JFrater knows. We’re not the only ones.
@Vera Lynn (176): Yes we met here. JFrater knows. We’re not the only ones.
It’s a Listverse miracle !
[getting misty eyed]
@Randall (171): I don’t care if you dislike caps, Canchita. I use them for *emphasis,*
Excuse me, but what the hell are those little asterisk thingies for then? Do I emphasize, do I not emphasize? Do I look for footnotes? WTF? I’m so confused.
Complaints of your type contribute NOTHING
Ahhhh, order is restored.
@Maggot (178):
The asterisks are for *less emphatic* emphasis, doof. Whaddya think?
And you should always be looking for footnotes. I hide them in every comment. First one to find ‘em gets a Wii.
Cool list!
@Randall (179): The asterisks are for *less emphatic* emphasis, doof.
So there are varying degrees of emphasis now? Well lookit Mr. Fancy Pants.
Whaddya think?
I think you just make things up as you go along. I have a third cousin twice removed who owns a couple of Yale sweatshirts and he wrote about it in the blog that he publishes from his apartment in his mom’s basement, which as everyone knows, makes it factual. See, unlike you, I know how to back stuff up. So who’s the doof now?
footnotes…First one to find ‘em gets a Wii
I have better ways to spend my time, like playing WoW for hours on end. Man, you’re a loser.
I love your site! And with this list (and the comments on it), I’ve been inspired me to comment, for better or worse.
1) Thank you for yet another awesome list! Just in time for the holidays, another group of people to inspire selfless acts.
2) These are individual protests, not martyrs. You don’t have to die in order to protest. Marley belongs on this list as much as Rosa Parks does. And yes, she belongs. She protested, all by herself, which means she meets the criteria. Protests do not have to be successful to exist.
3) I love the comments; they make me think just as much and as deeply as the list does.