I should start out by saying that I have never studied art and know very little about it. I donât know what makes a good painting great, or a great painting a masterpiece, but I do know what makes one famous. That would be any painting that even a guy like me would recognize. This list is not about colors, depth of field, symbolism, interpretation or why the artist chose to paint on beaverboard over canvas. This list looks at the personal lives of the people that have posed as subjects or models in 10 well known paintings – a subject that I feel is never discussed enough. Please comment if anyone feels the information I have gathered is not entirely accurate, or if you have any other interesting facts on these subjects and models.

Artist: Grant Wood 1891 â1942
Year Painted: 1930
Grant Wood painted American Gothic as the United States was entering the Great Depression. Wood was looking for models that would capture the essence of hard-working Middle America. The artist decided on using the family dentist, Dr. B.H. McKeeby (1867â1950), to model for the older man and his sister, Nan Wood (1899â1990), for the younger woman. The two, reluctantly, posed for the painting after Wood assured them that they would not be recognized. The models never stood in front of the house, and sat separately for the painting. The painting became one of the most famous images in the world, and one of the most parodied. Nan married a real estate investor and spent the rest of her life as a historian for her brother’s work. Dr. McKeeby kept the practice that he established in 1901 in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, almost until his death. You can see Dr. McKeeby and Nan Wood standing next to the famous painting here.
Interesting Fact: There is something of a debate as to whether the painting is meant to depict a husband and wife. Many experts believe that Wood painted them as a couple, originally. It is also said that Nan Wood was embarrassed at being depicted as the wife of someone twice her age, and began telling people that the painting was of a man and his daughter. In a letter written by Grant Wood in 1941, he seems to confirm that the woman is the manâs âgrown up daughterâ. You can read the actual letter here.

Artist: Thomas Lawrence 1769 â1830
Year Painted: 1794
Pinkie is the portrait of Sarah Barrett Moulton, who was approximately eleven years old when she was painted. Sarah was the daughter of a wealthy Jamaican plantation owner named Charles Barrett Moulton. She was born and raised in Jamaica, and traveled to England to further her education. While in England her grandmother commissioned Thomas Lawrence to paint the, now famous, portrait. Sadly, Sarah died on April 23, 1795, just one year after the portrait was completed, due to whooping cough, which she most likely contracted from one of her brothers. Her brother Edward, who would later own the portrait, changed his surname to Moulton-Barrett and became the father of one of the most prominent poets of the Victorian era, Elizabeth Barrett Browning, making Sarah Elizabethâs aunt.
Interesting Fact: Prints of Pinkie and The Blue Boy are often sold or displayed together, as if they are related in some way, or painted by the same artist. They are actually works by different artists, and painted a quarter century apart. Both works are now the property of The Huntington at San Marino, California, where they hang across from one another in the same room.

Artist: James McNeill Whistler 1834 â1903
Year Painted: 1871
Most would consider Whistler’s Mother a strictly all American iconic symbol. However, many are not aware that she was actually painted, and died, outside the US. Anna McNeill Whistler was born in 1884 in North Carolina. In 1831, she married widower George Washington Whistler, and inherited 3 stepchildren. Anna gave birth to two sons, James and William. She also had two other sons who died at a young age. In 1842 the family moved to Russia when her husband was hired as a railway engineer. After her husband died from cholera in 1849, she returned to the US to live in Connecticut. During the Civil War, Anna crossed lines to be with William, who was a surgeon in the Confederate Army. She then went to London where James moved after getting kicked out of West Point. Anna encouraged his painting and agreed to pose for her son. James then painted the now famous âArrangement in Grey and Black No.1 Portrait of the Artistâs Motherâ commonly referred to as âWhistlerâs Mother.â Anna died in Hastings, England, in 1881. James arranged for her burial in the Borough Cemetery, and on her white gravestone is inscribed: “Blessed are they who have/not seen/And yet have believed.”
Interesting Fact: Annaâs husband, George (âWhistlerâs Fatherâ), was actually a very prominent railroad engineer. Stone arch railroad bridges that he built in 1841 are still in freight and passenger service in western Massachusetts. He also invented a system of communication between the locomotive engineer and the train crew, known as ‘Whistler’s Trumpet’. While in Russia, he served as consultant on the building of Russia’s first major railroad, the Moscow-Saint Petersburg Railway. He is also credited with selecting the five-foot rail gauge that is still used in Russia and neighboring countries. For his efforts he was awarded the Order of St. Anna from Tsar Nicholas.

Artist: Andrew Wyeth (1917â 2009)
Year Painted: 1948
Andrew Wyeth was inspired to create this painting at his summer home in Cushing, Maine, when he was looking through his window and saw a woman crawling across a field. The womanâs name is Christina Olson (1893-1969). Christina had a degenerative muscular disorder (sometimes identified as polio) that took away her ability to walk. Wyeth met Olson and her brother, Alvaro, in 1939 when they were introduced by a woman named Betsy. Betsy would later become the artist’s wife, and also a summer resident in Cushing. There are two models who posed for the woman in this painting. The figure’s thin legs, arms and pink dress belong to Christina Olson, who was in her mid 50′s at the time. The head and torso belong to Wyethâs wife Betsy, who was in her mid 20′s at the time. Christina Olson lived in her house her entire life, and neighbors say she had no idea that she, or her house, had become famous. In the year 2000, Andrew and Betsy Wyeth celebrated their 60th wedding anniversary.
Interesting Fact: A friendship developed between the artist and the Olsons, and Wyeth was even allowed to use an upstairs room as a studio. The Olson House was placed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1995. You can see a photo of the Olsonâs House as it appears today here.

Artist: Ădouard Manet 1832-1883
Year Painted: 1862/63
Manet created quite a stir with the French public when this painting went on display in 1863. There are actually two people who modeled for the nude woman. Manet used his favorite model, Victorine Meurent (1844- 1927), for the womanâs face and his future wife, Suzanne Leenhoff (1830-1906), for the womanâs body. Suzanne Leenhoff had a ten year relationship with Manet before they finally married in 1863. The two met when Suzanne, who was a musician, was hired by Manet’s father to give Edouard and his brother, Eugene, piano lessons. During their ten year relationship, Suzanne gave birth to a son, Leon Koella. Both Manet and his father have been proposed as the boy’s natural father. Leon was introduced to other people as Suzanne’s younger brother. The face model, Meurent, was also an artist and had many exhibits at the prestigious Paris Salon. The two men in the painting are Manet’s brother, Eugene and his future brother in law, Ferdinand Leenhoff.
Interesting Fact: A painting by Victorine Meurent, called Le Jour des Rameaux or Palm Sunday, was recovered in 2004, and is the only surviving example of her art work. You can see the painting here.

Artist: Pablo Picasso 1881 â1973
Year Painted: 1937
If you are familiar with Picassoâs work you will know the model used for this painting is Dora Maar (1909-1997). Maar was a French photographer, poet and painter. She was also Picasso’s mistress, from 1936 until 1944. They were introduced when she was 29 and Picasso 54. In the course of their relationship, Picasso said this about Maar, “For me she’s the weeping woman. For years I’ve painted her in tortured forms, not through sadism, and not with pleasure, either; just obeying a vision that forced itself on me. It was the deep reality, not the superficial one.” “Dora, for me, was always a weeping woman….And it’s important, because women are suffering machinesâ. Maar was an independent artist, but she eventually came to suffer from their relationship after after discovering she was unable to have children. Picasso also referred to Dora as his “private museâ. She spent her last years living, alone, in a house near Paris that Picasso had given her.
Interesting Fact: In 2006, another one of Picasso’s portraits of her (“Dora Maar with Cat”) was auctioned at a closing price of $95,216,000, making it the world’s second most expensive painting ever sold at auction. You can see most of Picassoâs paintings and sketches of Dora Marr here.

Artist: Gustav Klimt 1862 â1918
Year Painted: 1907
Adele Bloch-Bauer was born in Vienna, Austria, in 1881, into a wealthy Jewish banking family. In 1899, at age 17, she married sugar magnate and banker Ferdinand Bloch Bauer. Ferdinand was a major patron of Gustav Klimt, and commissioned him to paint a portrait of Adele. In 1907, three years and hundreds of sketches later, Adeleâs portrait was completed. Klimt would go on to paint Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer II, in 1912. Adele was the only model to have been painted by Klimt more than once. The Bloch-Bauers were well-established in Klimtâs inner circle, which also included Sigmund Freud and composer Arnold Schoenberg. Scholarly opinions differ as to whether or not Klimt and Adel were having an affair. The Bloch-Bauers purchased 6 of Klimtâs works, including both portraits of Adele and four of Klimt’s mood landscapes. On January 24, 1925, Adele died suddenly of meningitis, in Vienna. In her will, she asked her husband to donate Klimtâs paintings to the Austrian Gallery after his death. In 1938, when the Nazis invaded Austria, Adele’s widowed husband had to flee abroad because of his Jewish roots, and was forced to abandon all his possessions. His property was confiscated, including the Klimt paintings.
Interesting Fact: In a 1945 testament by Ferdinand Bloch-Bauer, he designated his nephew and nieces, as the inheritors of his estate. After a lengthy court battle between the United States and Austria, it was finally established in 2006 that Maria Altmann (Bloch âBauerâs niece living in California) was the rightful owner of the paintings. Later that year, the Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer I was sold for a reported $135 million, making it one of the most expensive works of art ever to change hands.

Artist: Pierre-Auguste Renoir 1841-1919
Year Painted: 1881/82
Renoir often included several of his friends in his works, and this one is no exception. Included among many of his friends in this painting, is his future wife Aline Charigot (the one cooing with the dog). Another friend in the painting is the famous French painter Gustave Caillebotte, who is seated in the lower right. Renoir and Aline were married in 1890, five years after the birth of their first son, Pierre. Aline became the love of Renoirâs life, and she is immortalized in many of his other paintings. They later had two more children, Jean and Claude. Although Aline was 23 years younger than her husband, she died four years before Renoir, in 1915. You can see a photograph of the couple later in life here.
Interesting Fact: Two of their sons, Pierre and Jean, became well known actors and film directors. Jean was nominated for an Academy Award for directing the film The Southerner. In 1975 he received a lifetime Academy Award for his contribution to the motion picture industry.

Artist: Vincent van Gogh 1853 â1890
Year Painted: 1890
Dr. Paul Gachet (1828-1909) was a great supporter of artists and the impressionist movement, in part because he, himself, was an amateur painter. The doctor was also friends with, and treated, famous artists such as Pissarro, Renoir, Manet and Cezanne, and amassed one of the largest impressionist art collections in Europe. Dr. Gachet married Blanche Castets in 1868, and had two children, Marguerite and Paul. In May of 1890, after van Gogh was released from an asylum for mental illness, he remained in need of medical supervision. Van Goghâs brother, Theo, thought that Dr. Gachet was a good choice to treat van Gogh, because of his love for art. During the time van Gogh spent with him, he said this about the physician âsicker than I am, I think, or shall I say as muchâ. No one really knows what the artist meant by these words, but some believe van Gogh knew the Doctor was not fit to treat him. On July 27, 1890, van Gogh went into a field to paint and shot himself in the chest with a revolver. Dr. Gachet was summoned but his wound was inoperable and van Gogh died two days later. It should be noted that none of van Goghâs family held Gachet responsible for his patients death.
Interesting Fact: Dr. Gachet practiced his art under the name Paul van Ryssel. His most famous work is a sketch of Van Gogh on his death bed and can be seen here. The doctors son, Paul Louis, became an art dealer after inheriting hundreds of works of art from his father. Like his father, he was also an amateur artist, and painted under the name Louis van Ryssel. He kept the family tradition going by also sketching Van Gogh on his death bed. You can see a see his sketch here.

Artist: Leonardo da Vinci 1452 â 1519
Year Painted: c-1503-1506
I know this is an obvious choice for number 1, but how could she not be? Even though Mona Lisaâs real name and identity was first linked around 1550, it wasnât until just a couple of years ago that it was 100% confirmed. Her real name is Lisa del Giocondoa, member of the Gherardini family. She was born in Florence on the 15th of June, 1479, and was the oldest of seven children. At age 15 she married Francesco del Giocondo, a cloth and silk merchant. After some business success in 1503, her husband was able to buy a house next door to his family’s old home, in the Via della Stufa. It is believed that it was then that her portrait was commissioned by her husband, perhaps to celebrate their new house, or maybe to mark Lisaâs 2nd pregnancy. During the painting of Lisa, Da Vinciâs handwritten notes make reference to Lisaâs cheerful personality and her engaging laughter. Lisa and Francesco had five children: Piero, Camilla, Andrea, Giocondo and Marietta. Lisa also raised Bartolomeo, the son of Francesco and his first wife, who died just a year after he was born. Daughters Camilla and Marietta became Catholic nuns. Camilla took the name Suor Beatrice and died at age 18, while Marietta took the name Suor Ludovica, and became a respected member of the convent. Accounts of Lisa and Francescoâs days together differ, but there is no dispute over Francescoâs undying love for his wife, Lisa. Francesco died at the age of 80, around 1538, when the plague swept the city. Some historians claim Lisa died four years later, but same say she lived into her seventies, dying around 1551.
Interesting Fact: In 1506 Leonardo considered the portrait unfinished. He was never paid for the work, and did not deliver it to his client. The painting traveled with him throughout his life, and he most likely completed it many years later in France.




















Interesting list! Was misled by the name title for a moment…maybe "subjects" instead of "models?"
by the title*
Me too I was expecting sculptures etc, but was pleasantly surprised by this- very interesting list!
http://onfinite.com/libraries/1601139/album/540/4…
VERY interesting list , i really dig painings 7 and 4 , beautiful and quite trippy . and of course no.8 because of Mr Bean . .his description of her was also pretty good.
Mr. Bean?
pic: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dhjiz/2488608892/
pt. one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQevyIy8hzs
The actual sketches of Van Gogh on his deathbed are interesting. I'd only ever seen the one by Dr Gachet aka Paul van Ryssel. But after having seen the one by his son Louis van Ryssel, I prefer it over the first one. With the painting Christina's World, I once saw a program that discussed the painting in detail and it highlighted the fact that on first glance you think of a young woman, but closer inspection shows the withered hands and thin arms and legs, something I'd never noticed before. Great list Blogball and well put together.
I thought this list would have been boring,it's not really my thing,but i was wrong,really interesting.
Whistlers mother – she was born in 1884 but married in 1831???got to be a misprint
Hope to get this clear once and for all.
The word "Mona" spelled like this, means vagina in Venetian dialect.
The correct word is "Monna" which is the syncopated form of Madonna.
Litteraly meaning MyLady is used for defining the Virgin, is a polite way to call an unknown female, and of course, a italian-american 50 y/old singer with a bit of a british accent.
Who cares you mona
This actually made me laugh out loud.
It didn't make me smile. rude and uncalled for.
still, good punch line.
My dear mordechai,
now you know how does it feel like putting pearls before swine…
*bows*
i'm an art student but i can never guess why the mona lisa is considered to be the best. because leo said she was? because of her smile? ehh. plus picasso with his weird faces. they are eye catching, to be sure, but worth millions of dollars? i don't THINK so. and don't get me started on jackson pollock, one of, if not the, most overrated artists in the history of the world. great list tho.
I don't appreciate Pollock either >:¬(
Great list! Nice to know that there were actual models involved… I would have thought the Renoir was done from 'memory'.
IMO, The Mona Lisa is considered to be great largely for the simple reason that it was painted by Da Vinci, who was one of the best (if not THE best) artists from the Renaissance era.
Picasso was just so different than anyone before him. His use of abstract and geometric shapes were surreal and difficult to accept if you were used to the traditional form of portrait/landscape art. In short, he was weird, and eventually weird is what's "cool".
Now, Jackson Pollock, completely different story. His fame reminds me of that book, "The Emperor's New Clothes". He splattered some paint on a canvas, convinced someone it was "expressionistic art", and we all kept our mouths shut about not getting, or even really liking, his paintings. One day some kid will say, "Hey, that's not art! That's just the tarp I had left over from painting my room last week!"
I do love expressionism and abstract art, but I don't really care for Pollock. If you do and would like to tell me why, I'd love to hear it and get someone else's point of view.
One day some kid will say, “Hey, that’s not art! That’s just the tarp I had left over from painting my room last week!”
I study fine art and this is the comment you hear from the failing students that sit at the back of the lecture hall who everybody likes to ignore. It isn’t an original thought and it isn’t clever. Have you ever seen a Pollock or do you rely on reproductions?
I don't consider myself an art critic, but I actually enjoy Pollock's work. Funny thing taste is.
moi, compare the work of Jackson Pollack and Sam Francis side by side. In one case, you see an angry explosion of emotion and personality, in the other you'll see a controlled and beautifully serene application of color, a calm and soothing image which begs you to fall into it, to live in it, to exist in its harmony.
Picasso's cubist period has to be approached with the right frame of mind, the right frame of reference in order to see and appreciate the brilliance of his work there. What was going on was he was seeing the model from all angles at once, and then transferring that minds image to the canvas exactly as he was seeing it…Image if you could flatten out the face of the person next to you. Then sort of slip one side down just a schooch. That pretty much explains what Pablo was seeing, was painting, in his cubist period.
The question of value is always up to the market. It has little to do with the actual value of the piece of art.
art is all about personal taste.
it has no importance whether you like the monna lisa or pollacks works. They ARE art. appreciate art for art sake.
humanity worries me.
While I am not such a fan of Jackson Pollock, his work truly was revolutionary because for the first time in the art world, what was being painted was…paint! The subject matter IS paint, and anyone who's ever seen a Pollock up close can attest to this. As for your comment on Picasso and his "weird faces", that's rather ignorant, and a surprising comment coming from an art student too? Perhaps you need to revisit your art history professor and try to understand the reason why such paintings are so valuable and timeless.
dont forget art is art because of how it moves you, does Pollock make you mad,sad,excited etc
I super LOVED this list. Way to go!
I super LOVED this list. Way to go!
lol did you just copy paste the comment on top?
either that or a pretty darn good coincidence!
I loved this list. I find it facinating to learn about people. It makes the paintings more intriguing when you think about the history behind some of them. It makes the artist and the model more human and I find I appreciate their work even more. I loved the extra links that you included. I was entrhralled by the letter written by the Grant Wood and what he was trying to portray in his painting the "Amercian Gothic".
Excellent list, one of the best in a while. Not my favourite paintings but still very interesting indeed. I for one though really don't see the appeal of Gustav Klimt, here in Vienna you are constantly harassed with his paintings whenever you go into a museum for modern art, but to each their own I guess.
Julius, I, too, think Klimt is overexposed. Everywhere.
In Uni his gold, gold, gold, was enough to want to want me change Majors (my actual Major was Photography, but I had to take a ton of Art classes, too).
Hi batman mwahahahahaha
Quit *****ing around you two
what'd I miss???
Make that six. Dibs on Robin
one model that I find interesting is jeanne hebuterne who was modiglianis tragic wife/muse
I thought the Mona Lisa was a self portrait???
Yep, total self portrait. You should google some of her other works; she did her best work in her later years.
:):)
Old wives tale which has been dismissed some years ago.
Yes, I was being sarcastic. Sarcasm doesn't translate well in the comment section, evidently.
Sorry.
And you even gave plenty of hints!
~sigh~
Totally my fault, I did not catch an OBVIOUSLY sarcastic remark.
Wyeth is the sh*t!
About the painting of Renoir…for a long time, I’ve wondered who was the lady in the center. She seems to be the only character without any interaction with the other characters in the painting.
Kindly inform me, anyone? Thanks.
Hi circlefan, see my comment below
I tought she was Amélie.
*thought
I'm no art buff, but I have always liked portraits or paintings with people in them. I find that they inspire so many different scenarios or stories in my mind (especially if I don't already know the history behind that painting) eg who are these people, why were they painted, what frame of mind were they in (Van Gogh paintings especially), what sort of lives did they lead etc..
It just goes to show you don't have to be an art expert in order to enjoy art.
also-
Annette Arm (Giacometti)
Gala (Dali)
Kiki of Montparnasse
Camille Claudel
-Who was Goya's Maja?
-Helga Testorf, whom Wyeth painted for 14years (including many beautifully intimate nudes) without his wife's or Helga's husband's knowledge.
-I believe Picasso's Dora Weeping developed out of an off-shoot while working on Guernica. The morphing shapes of the characters became other works.
Upding for namechecking Helga. A museum in a city I used to live in owns a Wyeth painting. When the Helga thing broke, they discovered that the walking women in the picture was her.
Many of these are modern art.. I guess many people aren't that fond of Greeks anymore..
Other notable omissions from this list: Sargent's "Madame X":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portrait_of_Madame_X
And, of course, Courbet's "The Origin of the World":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27Origine_du_monde
I just can't see anything magnetic about Whistler's Mother. All the rest have something that draws my undisciplined eye, something I can't always put my finger on, but Whistler's painting is memorable to me only because I've been told it's famous.
Regarding American Gothic, although it's a nice enough painting, I'm surprised it was famous a mere 12 years maximum after it was painted. I admit it has that "something" to me, but…
Picasso. What the hell did he need a model for? He could have used a broken mirror for a model. It is fascinating to me, but mostly because 'it's a Picasso". If Juan across the street had painted it, I doubt I'd buy it, except to help ol' Juan out.
Great list, Blogball, even if I can't truly appreciate all of them. Thanks!
I would have put The Last Supper in there, slightly less obvious, but has a really cool story. It's suspected that all the men in the painting were just average men walking around whom De Vinci just decided to immortalize as Jesus and/or the apostles
It's also suspected that the models for the portrait of 13 women in the United States Capital Building were all local prostitutes.
I read almost everyday but never comment, and I just had to. This is a great list and really interesting, but I would have loved to see Sargent’s “portrait of Madame x”, with Virginie Avegno Gatreau ( I’m spelling her name by memory so it may not be totally correct), amazing painting and amazing woman!
Well, after a long time, a fabulous list. Bravo…
I still remember th description of the painting ‘Whistler’s mother’. According to a great critic, “‘Whistler’s mother’ – th painting is quite big, which is excellent. If it were very small, microscopic, then hardly anyone would be able to see it, which would be a shame. Secondly, and getting quite near th end of this *****ysis, secondly, why is this painting worth spending millions of dollars. And th answer is that it is th picture of whistler’s mother, and families are very important. Even though Mr. Whistler was quite aware that his mother was a hideous old bat who looked like she had a cactus lodged up her backside, he stuck with her and even took time to paint this amazing painting of her. It is not just a painting, it is a painting of a mad cow who he thought th world of…”
On the other hand, i feel so sorry fr Dora Maar. It looks like she was painted after she was hit by a number of cars outside her house.
But seriously, i loved today’s list. Last time i tried to draw an elephant, my young cousin told me i can draw good horses. So i appreciate someone who can paint. And that too paint so bloody beautifully. All have been, at one time or the other, my wallpapers. Amazing list… Bravo…
all hail blogball, creative genius of california
*youre* wallet is the one with the one that says "bad mother*****er"
Great list, Blogball!
I also no nothing of art except what I like. That's it.
I enjoyed the list and the descriptions given for each. I was able to recognize many of these paintings, but didn't know the stories behind all.
Interesting topic choice.
I admit I know nothing about art but I found it a bit comical that Picasso used a model for "The Weeping Woman". She must have been a real babe.
She was a real babe: http://web.gc.cuny.edu/french/images/faculty/caws…
You can also find some nude pictures if you google yourself
No I don't think I'll find nude pictures of myself on the internets.
Google "yourself" *snicker*
You scared me there for a bit. I googled myself and no nude pics where out. Yet.
Oh, should have rephrased that
"if you'd google for yourself"
That's what I thought. Did he need a model so he could get the eyes "just right", or perhaps the mouth? As far as I can see, he might have used a model to make sure he didn't get anything just right, by accident.
"Well gee, it would be a great painting, Pablo, but you accidentally let a curve-ism sneak in."
I think you the most notable omission from this list is "Girl with a Pearl Earring", also known as "the Mona Lisa of the North", no less…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girl_with_a_Pearl_Ea…
Nobody knows who she really was or what's the real story behind this portrait (the book and the movie about it unfortunately offer not much historical accuracy), so it's an understandable omission. I've had the chance to go the Mauritshuis in The Hague and see this picture for myself and I must say that it is truly impressive, even more so than the Mona Lisa in my opinion.
Well done, Blogball! I thoroughly enjoyed this list! Come on, not only the artists have lives, the models do, as well. I didn't even think some of the models were even real!
nice list
check out Gala Dali http://skeptically.org/sitebuildercontent/sitebui…
As I read the list, I was hoping for some info about Alphonse Mucha and his subjects/models. Not here, but that's quite okay since the pieces that are covered are all interesting.
The centuries have left a huge number of anonymous models in art, and it's nice that not all of them have to be nameless.
Well written and well researched, and I learned a lot, though I don't expect it all to stick.
I've always wondered who the model for the statue "David" was.
Nice list Blogball, It opens the door for a list about sculptures, as well.
I only know 3 of them, learned something today.
Being from Iowa and only an hour away from Woods hometown and where he spent the majority of his life, I often take for granted( no pun intended) his work. But his Iowa landscapes are what I like best. They remind me of home and what I saw looking out the car going on trips.
I love art
Great and interesting list. Any chance of a sequel?
Nice list Blogball, very entertaining! Do another one!
Thank you Blogball, with each one of these great lists you are writing your way to the top of a Top Ten Listversers list
This list needs a sequel and soon! How about including Hopper's Nighthawks (not the models, but the location in this case) or Proserpine, modeled by the beautiful, great Jane Morris?
This is a pretty cool list. I would never think to look into the lives of the models.
Very excellent list – what a welcome home! Great subject matter; the story helps us to better appreciate the art and nobody tells those stories better than Blogball. Again, great job.
Everyone loves a Blogball list. And it’s no wonder, they are all fantastic. Well done once again, dude! I particularly like your approach on this one, how you presented it on the level of a layperson, which most of us are. Well, mind you, I am not a layperson. I am actually a very accomplished and prolific artist. Most of my work is prominently displayed on my Mom’s refrigerator.
Me too!
I once made a bass relief using plaster of Paris in a paper plate and gently made an impression of my hand – after drying I carefully painted it yellow. It is still on display in my mothers bureau.
Lucky… I made a turkey out of my hand once and it was publically displayed on the inside of a trash can.
hahahahahaha!
I think we have all made that same turkey! They probably all ended up in the same place, too.
I don’t like to brag among those less talented than me, but doors really started opening for me once I mastered the technique of staying inside the lines. You should see the piece I am currently creating. Its working title is “Elvis on Black Velvet”, and I am up to number 5 now, which if you’ll pardon the artist’s jargon, is “red”.
Oh and for any of you out there who might happen to be animal rights activists, please don’t worry. I always use faux velvet.
I always feel inferior to you… I tried to make a cat and it turned into a platypus monkey creature from the depths of (insert demonic place here). Teach me your ways!
i just took a ball-point pen and traced my cat's paw, turkeyhand style.
i was hoping it would be something unrecognizable to me, so i could send it to tyb for identification.
im super bummed,
it looks just like the outline of a cats paw.
that's gonna get me *****-all at the new orleans art museum
*sigh*
Good for you, Maggs. I understand the wild Velvet is now on the severely endangered list, and unless something is done soon, they may become extinct in our life time.
BTW, I do hope it's not cadmium red.
Maggot's got rich taste in art supplies with the fancy velvet paper and his artist's jargon reds!
Lately I've been drawing on the back of receipts and using pens stolen from doctor's offices. Models are those sitting in waiting areas who don't report me to security for staring at them like some creepy stalker.
Maggot, I scoff at your artistically-bourgeoisie lifestyle!
I scoff at your artistically-bourgeoisie lifestyle!
I’ll have you know that my home is richly decorated with numerous Thomas Kinkade lithographs. I even numbered them because I heard that makes them more valuable. So I would advise you to think twice before calling me bourgeoisie, missie…
In a shameless plug to a list that I wrote awhile back about banned album covers, one of the ones that I didn’t use (I was saving it for a possible follow-up list) was the cover of Bow Wow Wow’s “See Jungle!…” album. It is a photo rendition of this list’s item #6 Le déjeuner sur l’herbe. The band’s lead singer Annabella Lwin posed as the nude woman, but it just so happened that she was only 14 at the time. Predictably, it was banned in most larger markets such as the UK and the US.
Here’s a look at the original cover:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bowwowwow_seeju…
Thanks, Maggot – interesting album cover.
Blogball! Blogball! Blogball!
You know what? I could just fill up the entire space with Blogball!
What an excellent list you put together, and I loved all the links. Having studied Art and Art History, this list was high on my right brain exercise program. A good balance to TyB's left brain excursions.
I noted a number of commenters boo hooing their fav's not being on here, or (worse!) the inclusion of a painter they don't like or don't understand (same thing).
Poor babies.
Ignore them.
You did a fabulous job!
Thank you very, very much!
Some of these painting I learned all about in my Art History (II) class.
The painting of Whistler's Mother's official title was Arrangement in Gray & Black (number 1). I actually recall learning that it wasn't necessarily his mother he painted, but it was a bit of an allusion to something about motherhood at that time in where he lived. I don't remember all the details, it was a little while ago. Lol.
And Manet's painting (Luncheon in the Grass) stirred a major controversy in the time for it being so suggestive and lewd for the time. The Paris Salon rejected it but he was still able to display it in Salon de Refuses (Salon of the Rejected.) I think even there they were a little iffy about displaying it, but they did no less.
Haha, this is me giving a little extra slice of art history, sorry.
But I enjoyed this list, a great read!
Great list you've put together, but you missed some of the more famous ones in the arts of Duchamp and other Danish artists. I just came across a pictorial article with some of the leading ladies of the arts world, read the article here:
Art's leading women
Thanks so much for the nice comments everyone. For some reason my attention is drawn to the subjects and models in works of art and I always wonder who they were in real life. So it was really fun for me to research and discover some interesting facts about these people. My favorite is Luncheon of the Boating Party because it makes you wonder what each person is thinking and what relationships they have with one another. It would be great to go back in time and watch Renoir paint it (as he flirts with his future wife) and meet all of these interesting people. I guess I would have to brush up on my French before I climb into the time machine.
As I was researching the painting I came across this link for anyone interested
as to who the other people are.
http://www.phillipscollection.org/collection/boat…
I got a thumbs down for my enthusiastic comments about your list, but I'd do it again!
Thanks blogball!!!
Luncheon is also my favorite on this list, but not for the same reason that you have (seeing Renoir flirt-hehe) But though I knew who the center girl is, I still find her enigmatic. Thanks again.
Art lists are rare – It should be noted that there have only been ten or twelve lists ever accepted in the art category by JF – so this list deserves special credit.
GOLD STAR BLOGBALL
About the lack or art lists: so true. The art world is chock-full of interesting stuff that you could write about here in Listverse. I personally contributed 3 art lists for Listverse, but I hope more will be written in the future. And hopefully they can be as well-written as Blogball's list.
blogball, you seem like you're smarter than I am.
I stopped counting how many people were smarter than me. I got to 12 and then ran out of fingers.
Sorta "Hills Have Eyes' comment there Maggot. Creepin with extra digits.
If you've got 12 fingers, you must be great at playing the piano
Don’t ruin your image bucslim
If you seem like the weaker animal in the jungle other animals (Randall) can sense it and will attack.
I don't know if the yellow number after my name means anything – but I have '62p' – I still haven't figured out what that means. Or what the 'p' stands for. But apparently I have 62 p's.
I don't have a big punch line here, just an observation. And I enjoyed your list.
Oh God, I have a punchline, but I can't use it.
Great list, Blogball! I left art school after my paintings were called ***** by a guy who sculpted actual *****.
kenny, you have to be strong enough to say "Damn it, my work is good, and I belong here. I need to learn everything I can learn, and I then I need to make the art my own."
Never, EVER, listen to nay sayers.
I'm an artist, a photographer. I do work that pushes the envelope every day. The stuff I do is so different from everyone else's work, that sometimes galleries don't know what to do with it. So they don't accept it. Then all of a sudden, they do! And everyone wants to do what I'm doing, by which time I'm doing something else.
Get it?
Just get in and do it. Tell yourself that you are the greatest thing since sliced bread, or whatever, and do your art. NOTHING CAN COME BETWEEN YOU AND YOUR ART.
Not if you're an artist.
Damn, kenny, it really *****es me off that the sculpter could get away with that B.S. How on earth did he get that much power over you? No one should be allowed to have that much power over you!
If you have a gift, the gift of ART, then it is your responsibility to the world to use it.
I'm serious about this.
Nice list. Very interesting. Thanks.
Very interesting list. Strange that these portraits should be so famous and yet the subjects so unknown…
was hoping you would include the subject of the Blue Boy as part of #9 (Pinkie) since you mention them being commonly hung together.
Good Work Listverse!! Keep the awsome Lists coming
awesome list!! loved it!!
" Anna McNeill Whistler was born in 1884 in North Carolina. In 1831, she married widower George"
Is it just me, or is this just not possible?
Thanks Mike, I think someone else mentioned this.
It’s a typo. She was born in 1804
Maybe one of the administrators or Jamie can fix it.
OK LOL, I must have read that a dozen times to make sure I wasn't seeing things wrong. Not an art lover here, but loved the list.
great list Blogball! BEST IN A WHILE
Whistler's mother wasn't the subject of the piece. It was a step towards nonobjectivism in a time when the idea had yet to be widely considered. The title is a massive key in understanding it (and many of his works), as it's meant to be read much like a musical composition. That is, the viewer is supposed to read the title and think not of a defined image, but an arrangement of colour much the same way a musical arrangement is a composition of various sounds. His mother was in the piece because she serves as a strong, dark element to balance the other blocks of colour around her. She is not the subject, but rather an element of an abstract yet visually mimetic image.
Well said. Bravo.
Wow! What a fantastic list. Well written and informative. A few of these were new to me, and I was happy to see some info on the Mona Lisa as well! That painting has always made me wonder.
I usually find Picasso's work weird and a bit creepy, but the one included here seemed, to me, very deep and emotionally charged. I couldn't stop looking at it.
Also, I couldn't believe the differences between the two van Ryssel sketches! Not that one was better than the other, just that the artists' perceptions seemed to differ. So amazing how two people can be looking at the same thing, yet see two different interpretations.
Again, great list!
Cool and informative list. Art lists are lacking here in Listverse, so it's nice to see lists like these.