10 More Unsolved Mysteries of the World
Published on July 23, 2008 - 219 Comments
There is no doubt that some of our most popular lists are ones which revolve around mystery and intrigue. Fortunately for us all, there is no end to the number of weird and wonderful mysteries in the world, so we are now able to present our fourth list of unsolved mysteries. So - onwards to the world of the mysterious!
Over the last few decades, miners in South Africa have been digging up mysterious metal spheres. Origin unknown, these spheres measure approximately an inch or so in diameter, and some are etched with three parallel grooves running around the equator. Two types of spheres have been found: one is composed of a solid bluish metal with flecks of white; the other is hollowed out and filled with a spongy white substance. The kicker is that the rock in which they where found is Precambrian - and dated to 2.8 billion years old! Who made them and for what purpose is unknown.
In 1938, an archaeological expedition led by Dr. Chi Pu Tei into the Baian-Kara-Ula mountains of China made an astonishing discovery in some caves that had apparently been occupied by some ancient culture. Buried in the dust of ages on the cave floor were hundreds of stone disks. Measuring about nine inches in diameter, each had a circle cut into the center and was etched with a spiral groove, making it look for all the world like some ancient phonograph record some 10,000 to 12,000 years old. The spiral groove, it turns out, is actually composed of tiny hieroglyphics that tell the incredible story of spaceships from some distant world that crash-landed in the mountains. The ships were piloted by people who called themselves the Dropa, and the remains of whose descendants, possibly, were found in the cave.

Beginning in the 1930s, the father of Dr. Javier Cabrera, Cultural Anthropologist for Ica, Peru, discovered many hundreds of ceremonial burial stones in the tombs of the ancient Incas. Dr. Cabrera, carrying on his father’s work, has collected more than 1,100 of these andesite stones, which are estimated to be between 500 and 1,500 years old and have become known collectively as the Ica Stones. The stones bear etchings, many of which are sexually graphic (which was common to the culture), some picture idols and others depict such practices as open-heart surgery and brain transplants. The most astonishing etchings, however, clearly represent dinosaurs - brontosaurs, triceratops (see photo), stegosaurus and pterosaurs. While sceptics consider the Ica Stones a hoax, their authenticity has neither been proved or disproved.
Workmen hacking and burning their way through the dense jungle of Costa Rica to clear an area for banana plantations in the 1930s stumbled upon some incredible objects: dozens of stone balls, many of which were perfectly spherical. They varied in size from as small as a tennis ball to an astonishing 8 feet in diameter and weighing 16 tons! Although the great stone balls are clearly man-made, it is unknown who made them, for what purpose and, most puzzling, how they achieved such spherical precision.
The Oera Linda Book is a controversial Frisian manuscript covering historical, mythological, and religious themes that first came to light in the 19th century. Themes running through the Oera Linda Book include catastrophism, nationalism, matriarchy, and mythology. The text alleges that Europe and other lands were, for most of their history, ruled by a succession of folk-mothers presiding over a hierarchical order of celibate priestesses dedicated to the goddess Frya, daughter of the supreme god Wr-alda and Irtha, the earth mother. The claim is also made that this Frisian civilization possessed an alphabet which was the ancestor of Greek and Phoenician alphabets. The current manuscript carries a date of 1256. Internal claims suggest that it is a copy of older manuscripts that, if genuine, would have been written by multiple people between 2194 BC and AD 803. [Source]
Fossils, as we learned in grade school, appear in rocks that were formed many thousands of years ago. Yet there are a number of fossils that just don’t make geological or historical sense. A fossil of a human hand print for example, was found in limestone estimated to be 110 million years old. What appears to be a fossilized human finger found in the Canadian Arctic also dates back 100 to 110 million years ago. And what appears to be the fossil of a human footprint, possibly wearing a sandal, was found near Delta, Utah in a shale deposit estimated to be 300 million to 600 million years old.
Humans were not even around 65 million years ago, never mind people who could work metal. So then how does science explain semi-ovoid metallic tubes dug out of 65-million-year-old Cretaceous chalk in France? In 1885, a block of coal was broken open to find a metal cube obviously worked by intelligent hands. In 1912, employees at an electric plant broke apart a large chunk of coal out of which fell an iron pot! A nail was found embedded in a sandstone block from the Mesozoic Era. And there are many, many more such anomalies.
The Ark is considered the greatest of all hidden treasures and its discovery would provide indisputable truth that the Old Testament is hard fact. Its recovery remains the goal of every modern archaeologist and adventurer. Its purpose was as a container for the ten commandments given on stone tablets by God to Moses on Mount Sinai. According to the book of Exodus, the Ark is made of shittim wood (similar to acacia) and gold-covered inside and out. It was topped by a mercy seat comprising two cherubs also made of gold. It was believed to have supernatural powers due to several events, including causing the death of a man, who attempted to steady the Ark as the oxen hauling it stumbled, bringing down the walls of Jericho in one battle, and showering misfortune on the Philistines after they captured it in another. There are several speculations around the final resting place of the Ark, and whilst it would take a shrewd operator to find it, it would need a brave or even foolhardy person to open it!

Angel Hair is a rare phenomenon that has so far defied explanation. It is made up of silken threads that rain down on to the earth, but reach out to touch it and it will almost certainly vanish before your eyes. It is a world wide phenomenon with the most regular occurrences from North America, New Zealand, Australia, and western Europe. There is no known proof for what causes this substance, or even what it is made up of. Speculations are that it has come from Spiders or another type of silk-spinning insect, and even UFO’s as it has often been associated with UFO sightings. Because of its sensitive nature, it has been difficult to collect, and to analyse as it is subject to contamination from car exhaust fumes, and even human contact, which could skew the chemical results.
The Piri Reis Map is a famous pre-modern world map created by 16th century Ottoman-Turkish admiral and cartographer Piri Reis. The map shows part of the western coasts of Europe and North Africa with reasonable accuracy, and the coast of Brazil is also easily recognizable. Various Atlantic islands including the Azores and Canary Islands are depicted, as is the mythical island of Antillia. The map is noteworthy for its depiction of a southern landmass that some controversially claim is evidence for early awareness of the existence of Antarctica. Some scholars claim this and other maps support a theory of global exploration by a pre-classical undiscovered civilization. [Source]
This article is licensed under the GFDL because it contains some quotations from Wikipedia.
Additional text for this article is courtesy of The Skeptical News.
Contributors: Rhyno, JFrater
Related ListsTop 10 Most Commented On Lists10 More Unsolved Mysteries Yet Another 10 Unsolved Mysteries Top 10 Significant Listverse Lists |
SubscriptionsLike this article? Subscribe to the RSS feed to keep 'em coming, or subscribe via email: |
If you find this site helpful, please leave a donation so you can enjoy the spirit of giving too.
Email This Post









1. astraya - July 23rd, 2008 at 3:05 am
By my calendar it’s July 23, not April 1. Am I missing something here?
2. Genesis105 - July 23rd, 2008 at 3:07 am
Nice list! Makes me wonder if archaeology isn’t a little screwed up… Sandals millions of years ago? Impossible! lol
3. cheese - July 23rd, 2008 at 3:08 am
wow. some of these are incredible
4. jfrater - July 23rd, 2008 at 3:09 am
astraya: such teh comedian
5. jake ryder - July 23rd, 2008 at 3:22 am
I have the answer to all of these
GOD DID IT! lol
6. Natalie - July 23rd, 2008 at 3:24 am
I love unexplainable things. =D Thanks JFrater!
7. Tervuren - July 23rd, 2008 at 3:44 am
Wait. Ica Stones were solved back in the Seventies, see an episode of Nova on Ancient Astronauts. Angel Hair is just silly. I agree with Astraya, it must be 1 April.
8. astraya - July 23rd, 2008 at 3:45 am
I’ve just checked. wiki has got pages on most of them, so they must be true. I’ll ignore the gentle tugging on my lower limb.
9. romerozombie - July 23rd, 2008 at 3:45 am
I think the Ica Stones are a hoax. If some of the dinosaurs are depicted are definetly brontosaurus, then they’re a hoax because the brontosaurus is a fictional dinosaur.
10. Joshua - July 23rd, 2008 at 3:49 am
I’m disappointed to see the dropa stones on here. It has been shown that the stones do not actually exist. The blurb could have at least mentioned the controversy.
http://www.unexplained-mysteri.....56158.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dropa
11. jfrater - July 23rd, 2008 at 3:49 am
romerozombie: brontosaurus is fictional? Wikipedia says this: “Apatosaurus, formerly known as Brontosaurus, is a genus of sauropod dinosaur that lived about 150 million years ago.”
12. romerozombie - July 23rd, 2008 at 3:54 am
I read somewhere it was a fictional cross between a diplodocus and another member of the diplodocidae family. :S
13. beff - July 23rd, 2008 at 3:56 am
the costa rican stones are not perfect spheres. NG did a study with computers and lasers and found some were not even close….
14. Tempyra - July 23rd, 2008 at 3:58 am
Uhh… so why does the SETI programme still exist if the Dropa stones are for real? Isn’t searching for alien intelligence a bit redundant if there are stones on Earth telling stories of spaceships? The stones seem to be ‘real’ but I remain skeptical of the translation
Cool list though, I love learning about mysteries like these!
15. Mr. Mysterious - July 23rd, 2008 at 4:06 am
WHO AM I???
16. Tempyra - July 23rd, 2008 at 4:17 am
Mr. Mysterious, that’s who
17. Catty - July 23rd, 2008 at 4:29 am
I have a friend from costa rica, and she brought me some of those stones when she came to visit. They are the smaller version of the larger stones. She lives in the jungle and is friends with the natives of costa rica, so we also have some artifacts which we have stored in a glass container.
18. Tempyra - July 23rd, 2008 at 4:38 am
Regarding the Costa Rica stones, I’m pretty sure they’re natural in origin. Has anyone (jfrater & other Kiwis in particular) ever been to Pink Beach in Far North New Zealand? It’s on the same stretch of coastline as the Kauri Cliffs golf course. Anyway, at the northern end of the beach are a whole lot of boulders - some are pretty close to spherical. If you saw one of them in isolation you’d probably think it wasn’t be natural either, but when you see a coastline covered in them it’s not so weird. I tried finding some photos, this are the best:
http://flickr.com/photos/palme.....057631747/
This one is of the beach from the hill, you can’t see the boulders shown in the first photo but it gives you an idea of the surrounding landscape:
http://flickr.com/photos/markescapes/2306770769/
19. crs - July 23rd, 2008 at 4:48 am
Well, I claim my uncle mysterious cartographer and he let me tell you - the States are actually in the south, apart from D.C., which is screwed up. Rosewell is in Ural Mts. and, by the Black Pit, Australia doesn’t exist at all.
Sorry for useless comment. Having a bad day.
20. Budz - July 23rd, 2008 at 4:48 am
jfrater , I knew those crazy little stones would make a list eventually. But I remember the Von daniken connection.. don`t see it mentioned above, would certainly make astraya`s comment seem to be right on the money.
21. Joshua - July 23rd, 2008 at 4:51 am
Argh! Since my previous comment has not appeared… I must say that the dropa stones are a disappointment to see on here, especially without any mention to the debate surrounding their existence. A quick internet search will show that they don’t exist.
22. warrrreagl - July 23rd, 2008 at 5:19 am
What a fun list!
23. DanOhh - July 23rd, 2008 at 5:52 am
“The Grooved Spheres” aren’t a mystery they were just an early version of the Death Star action figure. Damn, that Lucas is in everything.
24. Silarulz! - July 23rd, 2008 at 6:07 am
The ark of the covenant is in Ethiopia!
One solved, nine to go!
25. bec - July 23rd, 2008 at 6:18 am
to crs: yeah, sometimes living on a non-existent continent does have its challenges. Hi from the black pit.
Great list btw. I guess some things just cannot be explained by Science.
26. miller - July 23rd, 2008 at 6:31 am
cool list the first few bugged me out
27. Spence425 - July 23rd, 2008 at 6:35 am
Joshua
i’m not saying i believe one way or another. but, what i can tell you is that a “quick search on the internet” will “prove” anything you want it to, especially with horrible sources like wikipedia out there.
28. Cheapswill - July 23rd, 2008 at 6:36 am
Most of this list seems really familiar… I’m sure I have read it before. It’s not just that it was researched on Wikipedia, it seems like it was lifted word-for-word from another site. That’s why the notation in the Inca stones listing (about a triceratops photo) doesn’t make any sense.
It’s an okay list… but it seems a bit lazy.
29. ferret - July 23rd, 2008 at 6:40 am
Is it me or does #10 look like the death star?
Maybe these are the plans that the rebel alliance stole…
30. ravthewave - July 23rd, 2008 at 6:44 am
Great List! However, I feel the ark of the covenant should not be on this list since it is only known in script. All the other items on this list have been found or seen in person and are still unexplainable. Great List though, I love this stuff!
31. robneiderman - July 23rd, 2008 at 6:47 am
I thought number 10 looked like the Death Star, too!
32. fishing4monkeys - July 23rd, 2008 at 6:53 am
Awesome!!! These mysteries list are the ones that got me hooked un this site! I was going to suggest on the last list that you write another one of these but the comment wouldn’t post
One for the next amazing coincidences list?
haha maybe lot..
33. fishing4monkeys - July 23rd, 2008 at 6:54 am
#10…TOTALLY a deathstar!! I saw the resemblance immediatly and thought it was a starwars list before I read the title
34. fishing4monkeys - July 23rd, 2008 at 6:56 am
Wow can you imagine the conflict that would ensue if Ark Of The Covenant was found? (sorry for the triple psot :P)
35. Jackie - July 23rd, 2008 at 7:00 am
I know another name for this angel hair phenomenon…..they are called spiderwebs.
36. Bob - July 23rd, 2008 at 7:03 am
BILLIONS of years. . .lol right.
Also, those stones (number 10) are pretty obviously Death Star replicas and a hoax by some geeky archaeologist.
37. gabriel1836 - July 23rd, 2008 at 7:07 am
#10 - I totally see the Death Star argument.
And the Ark has been found, its sitting in a military warehouse in an unknown location.
As for the unexplained fossils and metallic objects it does serve to make one wonder whether carbon dating is really accurate and whether “fossil fuels” really aren’t renewable.
38. SlickWilly - July 23rd, 2008 at 7:23 am
The mystery of the Dropa stones has already been solved: They do not exist. It is a hoax, most widely attributed to Erich Von Danniken’s atrocious book Chariot of the Gods, a standard piece of conspiracy theory crappola in the vein of David Icke. That’s the guy who thinks that the world is controlled by shape-shifting, human-eating reptilian humanoids. Yeaaah.
I always like lists of this type, but the inclusion of the Dropa stones seems a bit disingenuous.
39. toolnut - July 23rd, 2008 at 7:35 am
Can’t beat an unsolved mysteries list!! Yay!!
Regardless of whether or not something has been disproven, Slick, its still interesting to learn about.
40. scotchdell - July 23rd, 2008 at 7:40 am
found most of this list here, including the triceratops pic
http://paranormal.about.com/od.....sphere.htm
41. Ghidoran - July 23rd, 2008 at 7:40 am
I thought this was the FIFTH list on mysteries? And it wasn’t the best. Since I have nothing better to do….
10. Possibly ancient witch doctor objects, the fact that it was found in Precambrian rock is probably a case of Fossil Transition, a theory I made up after reading this list. An object in the Earth’s rock will shift it’s position(in this case, down) to another one due to some physical effects eg. earthquakes, plate movement, volcanic activity, magnetic fields etc.
9. I’m sorry, what? They found hundreds of disks in a remote cave in China, and on the disks were etched the story of a spaceship crash landing? …… Okay. What proof is there that this was not just some ancient tribe who THOUGHT they saw a spaceship type thing crash and got panicky? And what heiroglyphics? If these were made thousands of years ago, how did people know how to read them? Was there something like the Rosetta Stone, in Egypt? Without further sources, I refuse to believe in such an occurence.
8. 50% sure they are fake(could be Fossil Transition again, I know they’re not fossils!). Also, did anyone wonder they could have found Triceratop skeletons? Or that it’s a simple co-incidence that the creatures happen to look like our image of dinosaurs? The second one is unlikely(the one about co-incidence), but the one about the skeletons seems logical.
7. If they could make the Nazca lines, and the Pyramids, and earthquake sensing devices, why can’t they make these? I think we seriously underestimate the power of the ancients. Also, who is to say they weren’t naturally made. Nature can make some bizzare and surprising things http://www.extremescience.com/.....ystals.jpg
6. Almost certainly fake. As in, lies. The thing may be real, but its accounts are not. Probably not, anyway. Seems ridiculous to me. I mean, did people believe the stories of the Iliad?
5. Again, they’re Fossil Transition cases, or people just imagined that they looked human. The second one’s more likely. The power of the mind is astounding.
4. All I can say is, Fossil Transition.
3. Is this even a mystery? What kind of a mystery is this? A religious mystery? Come on! Why not put Jesus on the next one, or Santa Claus! This is just plain stupid. Not that I don’t believe in it, but it has no place on this list.
2. Finally something interesting. I think it’s light phenomena, or some sort of lightning. Well, that’s what I thought before going to Wikipedia. To quote simply:
One of the possible explanations offered relates to the web-making activities of spiders. Some types of spiders are known to migrate through the air, sometimes in large numbers, on cobweb gliders. The threads created by these airborne arachnids are delicate enough to dissolve upon handling. Another possible explanation in some cases is a type of Chaff, a radar counter-measure which can be in the form of fine strands, which is dropped by some military aircraft.
And there you go. But I must admit, this one is interesting, and I had never heard of it before.
1. All lies. Just kidding. All truth. Nothing wrong with it as far as I’m concerned. Antillia may have been real, but it may just have been a normal island like…well, Iceland. Who knows? But I don’t think this should have been number one, unless the order didn’t matter. For example, number 10 was more interesting than some(like no.
Overall, I give this list a 6/10. Good effort, but it was mostly about old stuff and Fossil Transition jk and well you get it. The last two(angel hair and the map) were the real interesting ones. You missed out on many famous ones, like cattle mutiliation, flying rods, dinosaurs in Congo, the Braxton County Monster etc.
42. Marie - July 23rd, 2008 at 7:51 am
I love lists like these!
I was hoping to see the inclusion of the horned skeletons found in Sayre, Pennsylvania.
43. scotchdell - July 23rd, 2008 at 7:51 am
After doing a search for “Impossible Fossils” on google I clicked the first link and came across this Ancient Artifacts, where I found most of this list, including the missing triceratops picture. good list though
44. Acronyx - July 23rd, 2008 at 7:59 am
no. 10, 9, 5, 4 = time travel perhaps?
very interesting list!
45. kowzilla - July 23rd, 2008 at 8:03 am
As to number 3, we have top men working on it now.
Top…men.
46. kowzilla - July 23rd, 2008 at 8:13 am
Acronyx (#43)
Has anyone else read Chuck Palahniuk’s book, Rant? Because Number 5 on the list is mentioned several times.
47. Ro - July 23rd, 2008 at 8:28 am
Gotta love mysteries.
48. Csimmons - July 23rd, 2008 at 8:28 am
as to #3, it is in some storage facility I do believe….
great list.
49. Randy - July 23rd, 2008 at 8:52 am
I realize that with the passing of time ideas for new lists are harder to come by. I thought, though, that one of the “rules” for this site was original lists. 6 of the 10 item on this list were copied word for word from this site http://paranormal.about.com/od.....sphere.htm
I enjoy the site, Jamie, I really do. But do you have to resort to lifting previously published material? I can understand culling from various sites to compile a list of your own, but when 60% of “your” list comes from a previously published single list, I think it’s time to re-think that particular list.
Again, I still enjoy the site and will continue to read and comment occasionally. Just disappointed in the way this particular list was done.
50. Brans - July 23rd, 2008 at 8:53 am
I immediately thought of Rant when I got to number 5. That book was really fanstasic.
Great list! I know have X Files theme music stuck in my head
51. Juan-of-a-Kind - July 23rd, 2008 at 9:00 am
The fossilized bones and prints really make me wonder if archaeoligy is certain about time periods. Maybe it does not take that long for something to fossilize.
52. Joss - July 23rd, 2008 at 9:07 am
A few of these are easily explained if you think about it logically.
53. chris - July 23rd, 2008 at 9:08 am
I could be wrong, but I thought I read recently that the Dropa Stones were a hoax.
54. dangorironhide - July 23rd, 2008 at 9:12 am
Another awesome unsolved mysteries list! Keep ‘em coming!
These just make you go ‘woah…wait a minute…’
55. Randall - July 23rd, 2008 at 9:13 am
Okay… the Dropa Stones and the Ica Stones and the Piri Reis maps are known hoaxes. No mystery there. Or, no more “mystery” than, say, the Bermuda Triangle, which is part hoax and part exaggeration built up to sell books.
The giant balls of Costa Rica are NOT “spherically precise.” Some of them just look it. But many don’t. And even the ones that look it have been thoroughly tested and found to be way off from perfectly spherical. Little mystery here… the local inhabitants made these hundreds or perhaps a thousand or so years ago. Ingenious and showing hard work and dedication, but not a huge mystery—except as to WHY they did it. But same question applies to Easter Island. Answer is people do all sorts of weird things on a “fad” basis or for folk tradition or religious reasons.
Stories of impossible fossils or out-of-place objects are fun (I love ‘em) but few, if any, have been supported by authenticated documentation. In short, there’s little or no proof, and many of these so-called finds were quickly “lost” after their discovery. Some of the fossil finds, in addition, are down to perception—they are said to BE fossil handprints or footprints, for instance, when in fact they only bear a slight RESEMBLANCE to handprints or footprints. People obfuscate finds sometimes for the sake of simply being sensational, or religion, or what have you.
56. Riya B. - July 23rd, 2008 at 9:24 am
Yay,another mysteries list!!! I have heard of the angel hair phenomena,but as for #5 and 4, they just blew me away!
57. JB - July 23rd, 2008 at 9:28 am
I don’t understund how a “10 More Unsolved Mysteries of the World” list can be full of proved hoaxes as this one is.
Ica stones are reconized hoax even by their authors.
One of the worse and most undocumented list ever seen in this site
58. Frank LaDouche - July 23rd, 2008 at 9:29 am
Randall u just kill everything
59. Kreachure - July 23rd, 2008 at 9:34 am
“…some of our most popular lists are ones which revolve around mystery and intrigue.”
#10: http://paranormal.about.com/od.....-Artifact/
#9: http://paranormal.about.com/od.....Stones.htm
#8: http://paranormal.about.com/od.....Stones.htm
#7: http://paranormal.about.com/od.....a-Rica.htm
#5: http://paranormal.about.com/od.....ossils.htm
#4: http://paranormal.about.com/od.....bjects.htm
“Contributors: KyleC, Rhyno, JFrater”
Mystery and intrigue indeed…
60. JB - July 23rd, 2008 at 9:35 am
search ooparts in google. Some of them are really still unsolved mysteries (like old partian batteries)
61. VanDammer - July 23rd, 2008 at 9:37 am
I’m a little concerned about the grooved South African spheres since the Weekly World News is cited as one of the informational resources as to their origin
(http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/mom/spheres.html)
62. segue - July 23rd, 2008 at 9:57 am
I quote from # 4 & # 5:
Humans were not even around 65 million years ago: yet a fossil of a human hand print for example, was found in limestone estimated to be 110 million years old. What appears to be a fossilized human finger found in the Canadian Arctic also dates back 100 to 110 million years ago. And what appears to be the fossil of a human footprint, possibly wearing a sandal, was found near Delta, Utah in a shale deposit estimated to be 300 million to 600 million years old.
****
It seems to me that with the millions of years involved, there could have easily been an almost total extinction of a human race living 110 million years ago…a wipe-out due to the earth colliding with a large meteor, plunging the planet into a deep, unforgiving winter for decades, perhaps. A disease affecting whatever was their main foraging diet, grasses say (which would include wheat and corn)or their target prey, so that starvation took a heavy toll. Heavy enough to send the survivors into deep hiding, small tribes hidden in jungles are still being discovered to this day. Whose to say they haven’t been around for 100 million years?
Stragglers, or the more adventurous, might have emerged millions of years later with tiny groups of followers here and there.
Off the wall theory? Yup!
But one way, besides out and out fraud, to explain those “fossils”.
63. YogiBarrister - July 23rd, 2008 at 10:01 am
I don’t know how many of these are hoaxes or genuine mysteries, nevertheless, finding out the truth is what living is all about. Great list!
64. Randall - July 23rd, 2008 at 10:01 am
Frank:
I know. It’s my curse.
65. Sedulous - July 23rd, 2008 at 10:03 am
Very interesting list. I also wonder about current dating methods. I mean I understand the half-life and radioactive rate of decay, but I always wondered if there were outside forces that could affect that and throw the date of something off by 1 million to 100 million years. I don’t understand it enough to know what would cause that but it could be one explanation for the anomalies. Maybe someone here knows, is it possible to slow down or speed up the rate of decay of some of the materials used for dating? As far as I can see even the things considered to be constant may in fact be unreliably considered so. There have been experiments conducted to temporary increase the speed of light. Overall I think it’s safe to assume that as advanced as science has become in the last 200 years, it is still primitive compared to what we don’t know.
66. VanDammer - July 23rd, 2008 at 10:13 am
Gotta agree w/ most respondents and say this list is pretty underwhelming. Too many hoaxes & heresay belittles all the other great lists.
This one’s just up the boohai.
67. DB - July 23rd, 2008 at 10:16 am
Wow, great list! Unlike most of the unsolved mysteries lists, I haven’t heard of any of these with the exception of the ark.
Any chance of getting some wikipedia or other links for further reading?
68. Phil - July 23rd, 2008 at 11:05 am
Suret theres nothin unusual about those round boulders, seen them in Orewa NZ, there is an explanation just cant remember, something to do with volcanism no doubt.
69. jhm - July 23rd, 2008 at 11:19 am
Great list, unsolved mysteries are the best, even if they are hoaxes, they still have an interesting history. Also, there was an extraordinary case of angel hair in caldwell NJ in 1970. The thread was pulled down by local boys and enough was collected to fill buckets. It was sent to DuPont for analysis and was found to be similar to fishing string with a hollow core. This always stuck in my mind. The article is here: http://www.weirdnj.com/index.p.....;Itemid=28
70. Nelia - July 23rd, 2008 at 11:24 am
The round stones remind me of Giant’s Causeway, which is covered in… Hexagons I believe it is? Pentagons maybe? I always forget which. There is a scientific explanation for Giant’s Causeway, of course, which I can’t remember but may be volcano related? Not a mystery, but it was still really neat!
Check it out -
http://photos.igougo.com/image.....useway.JPG
http://www.reformationtours.co.....useway.jpg
71. cody - July 23rd, 2008 at 11:34 am
how about the unsolved mystery of how strikingly similar this list is to this one?
http://paranormal.about.com/od.....sphere.htm
spooky
72. JayArr - July 23rd, 2008 at 11:41 am
Religious Folk Fads are still a mystery to me…
It’s possible I may have seen better lists on the back of a box of Twinkies, but I still can’t find any proof that they exist.
73. segue - July 23rd, 2008 at 11:50 am
I love unexplained mysteries. *Real* unexplained mysteries, hoaxes, I’m not particularly fussy about this one area.
Oh, I’ll go out of my way to uncover the hoaxes, absolutely, but that doesn’t mean I don’t just love them all the same.
In California, USA, we have a true unexplained mystery: The Moving Rocks of Playa Lake Bed, Death Valley.
http://sophia.smith.edu/~lfletche/deathvalley.html
Many theories have been advanced, but as of yet, none have come close to sufficient scientific proof to provide an answer.
This is *not* some “little green men did it” thing. It is fully acknowledged to be a natural phenomena, but no one can figure out exactly how it works.
It’s fascinating to see these rocks, of all sizes, sitting on the desert floor, with trails dug out of the ground, dozens or hundreds of feet behind them!
74. segue - July 23rd, 2008 at 12:06 pm
****
#71. cody
how about the unsolved mystery of how strikingly similar this list is to this one?
http://paranormal.about.com/od…..sphere.htm
spooky
****
uh, what?
Cody, seriously, what do you want them to do? Make up unsolved mysteries?
There are only so many, and this is the 4th or 5th list.
You can’t be original with material that’s been around the block for decades. Charles Fort made a living clipping articles about stuff like this 100 years ago. There’s still an active Fortian Society, and they’re still using old material.
Spooky.
75. Gravynj - July 23rd, 2008 at 12:17 pm
that’s really cool.
There’s a tribe somewhere in Africa that claims they have the ark. It’s pretty interesting to read about.
Good list.
76. Kreachure - July 23rd, 2008 at 12:19 pm
segue: The material at paranormal.about.com is copyrighted by About.com, which is owned by The New York Times. You just cannot publish something copyrighted by someone else anywhere, whatever the subject. Doing that is called plagiarism.
This is not the first time this happened here, and when it has, the lists which have been considered plagiarizing have been taken down.
77. Kreachure - July 23rd, 2008 at 12:21 pm
If you check the site, you’ll see that the text has been copied word by word, which is obviously illegal if such text is copyrighted.
78. segue - July 23rd, 2008 at 12:31 pm
****
#76. Kreachure
segue: The material at paranormal.about.com is copyrighted by About.com, which is owned by The New York Times…
**
#77. Kreachure
If you check the site, you’ll see that the text has been copied word by word, which is obviously illegal if such text is copyrighted.
****
Kreachure , I did, and you’re right! My apologies.
I’m a writer and photographer, so I know the evils of plagiarism very well.
Thanks for setting me straight.
79. ClarenceDarrow - July 23rd, 2008 at 12:38 pm
“You just cannot publish something copyrighted by someone else anywhere, whatever the subject. Doing that is called plagiarism.”
Are you an attorney, Kreachure? I think not, as you do not understand the meaning of plagiarism.
Plagiarism is about passing off somebody else’s original work as one’s own without attribution; this is a different concept to copyright breach (though you will often find the 2 go hand in hand).
Also, in #77 you say that copying word-for-word is “illegal”; again, this is wrong. This is entirely permissible if the copyright owner’s permission is given.
Whilst I understand the point you are making, your legal explanations are flawed.
80. James - July 23rd, 2008 at 12:44 pm
A lot of this can be used for poof(if real), that carbon dating is inaccurate or humans lived with dinosaurs.
81. Kreachure - July 23rd, 2008 at 12:50 pm
ClarenceDarrow: You’re right, I’m not an attorney (shocking!)…
But, as you define it, it IS plagiarism, and it IS copyright breach, as far as I can see. That’s what matters.
(Besides, I do NOT want anything that I say to be considered “legal”! *shudders*!)
82. sdggrant - July 23rd, 2008 at 12:58 pm
If I remember correctly, the brontosaurus has the body of one dinosaur, and the head of another. The Apatosaur is what the bronotosaurus was named after the correct head was put on the body.
83. segue - July 23rd, 2008 at 1:00 pm
****
79. ClarenceDarrow
Whilst I understand the point you are making, your legal explanations are flawed.
****
ClarenceDarrow, (very clever nick, btw) Kreachure’s intentions are pure.
When I looked closely at the attributions at the end of the list I found this:
This article is licensed under the GFDL because it contains some quotations from Wikipedia.
Contributors: KyleC, Rhyno, JFrater
Now, not being a lawyer myself, I don’t know if this is sufficient to take the entire argument off the table, but my gut says “yes”.
84. jtradke - July 23rd, 2008 at 1:06 pm
What’s funny is how this list is called “unsolved mysteries” when most or all of these are actually solved. Also what’s funny is the plagiarism.
Also what’s funny is how this is getting removed from my RSS reader, unless jfrater can come up with a good explanation for not only spreading bullshit, but unoriginal bullshit.
85. Kreachure - July 23rd, 2008 at 1:07 pm
segue: Nope. As I said, the about.com text is copyrighted. Any text that’s from Wikipedia is fine precisely because of the statement made about it at the end (which is the only requirement to reproduce GDFL material). But, the rest (which is to say most of it) cannot be posted, because of what it says right in this page a little further below:
“Copyright (c) 2007-2008 Jamie Frater. All Rights Reserved.”
I rest my non-case.
Sincerely,
Kreachure, non-attorney-at-law
86. segue - July 23rd, 2008 at 1:18 pm
****
85. Kreachure
segue: Nope. As I said, the about.com text is copyrighted. Any text that’s from Wikipedia is fine…
****
Got it. Two different issues.
Big trouble with one. No trouble with other.
segue, not-even-non-attorney-at-law ;-D
87. Mona - July 23rd, 2008 at 1:34 pm
I have no doubt in my mind that the Ica stones are a hoax, but what troubles me the most is this:
“The most astonishing etchings, however, clearly represent dinosaurs - brontosaurs, triceratops (see photo)”…? Huh? I’m looking right at the picture and all I see are men having sex with each other and a poor violated jar. Where are the dinosaur etchings? Did you switch the picture?
88. Cedestra - July 23rd, 2008 at 1:41 pm
Seems like no list can exist without some controversy. I wrote a list about goddamned rainbows and fluffy clouds and got reemed out for using someone’s pictures. ::rollseyes::
Anyway, I love these lists. They’re fun and I love exploring in my little brain what could be the possible explanation for these occurances.
89. DK - July 23rd, 2008 at 1:44 pm
For everyone that is bitching about the “plagiarism” & copywrite stuff: Quite often, Jamie takes submissions from readers, trusting that they are not copied straight from another site or list. Please do not blame Jamie for the fact that he trusted submissions that readers sent him, blame the people who submitted the info. I’m certain that once Jamie realizes what happened, he will in some way rectify the situation.
90. Kreachure - July 23rd, 2008 at 1:49 pm
DK: Well, I haven’t blamed Jamie, nor have seen anyone else blame him. But, he did put his name on it, so that’s why I find this particular case pretty hairy…
91. DK - July 23rd, 2008 at 1:54 pm
Kreachure: The post by jtradke (#84) sounded pretty accusatory to me, which is why I made that post. I would really hate for something like this to make such an awesome site look bad or for the site to lose readers over it. I am posting on the forums about this issue, so hopefully Jamie will see it there if he doesn’t see the comments here first.
92. Joshua - July 23rd, 2008 at 2:08 pm
@Spence425
A quick search of the internet can yield the information you are looking for without resorting to Wikipedia. Why don’t you try it instead of bashing the quality of material you most likely didn’t read. I quickly scanned the article and it succinctly explained the hoax of the Dropa stones as I’ve read from other sources.
93. jfrater - July 23rd, 2008 at 2:13 pm
Thanks to whomever pointed out that there was items here from another list elsewhere - normally I pull anything I find to be a copy but in this case only 5 of the items are plagiarized - the items by Rhyno and JFrater are not. I will restructure the list and provide fresh descriptions for the others.
94. dirtyrockerbarbie - July 23rd, 2008 at 2:40 pm
ah yes. the dropa stones.
paging agent mulder. the little green men have arrived.
and wow. random penis stones (ica). exaggerate much? lol!
the impossible fossils, it could be just as simple as funky settling after 100 million years, not a footprint. when i heard that i thought back to the “face” on the martian terrain… unsettling to be sure but more than likely a geographical anomaly.
HAHA the ark of the covenant is made out of shit(tam wood). now i’m very religious but even i can see the humor in that.
95. Alok - July 23rd, 2008 at 2:53 pm
The grooved spheres look like pokeballs. Mystery solved.
96. dirtyrockerbarbie - July 23rd, 2008 at 2:53 pm
Frank LaDouche: i started busting up laughing.
more music lists, anyone?
97. Kikishua - July 23rd, 2008 at 3:07 pm
When I saw No 7 it immediately reminded me of these http://flickr.com/photos/ypsoon/9127896/ which I saw in New Zealand (East coast of the South Island) - Moeraki boulders!
98. MPW - July 23rd, 2008 at 3:19 pm
Mystery lists are always my favorite. Lots of mysterious stones on this list. Still good reading though, nice list.
99. Mark - July 23rd, 2008 at 3:37 pm
Awesome list!
99th comment!
100. Cedestra - July 23rd, 2008 at 3:55 pm
BTW, I don’t see a Brontosaurus, I see a guy getting a reacharound 0.0
101. Petemurrey - July 23rd, 2008 at 4:04 pm
i think the greatest mystery is why fremantle can’t win a premiership
you know it makes sense
Im sam Kecovitch
102. astraya - July 23rd, 2008 at 4:09 pm
I don’t have time to give these my full consideration, so I’m going to declare that they are all a load of Penn and Teller Bullshit. That’s easier than thinking and simplifies my day enormously.
103. Davo - July 23rd, 2008 at 5:02 pm
I hope no one actually expects to find the ark of the covenant…
104. Hannah - July 23rd, 2008 at 5:05 pm
I’m sure I’ll get ripped apart for this one, but in regards to the “impossible fossils”- perhaps the earth is not as old as science has decided it is and perhaps fossils really don’t take MILLIONS of years to form. Perhaps dinosaurs and humans did co-exist. If baffles me that this absolutely could not be a plausible theory, and yet the universe being created from nothing is completely accepted…
105. jfrater - July 23rd, 2008 at 5:33 pm
Okay - I have now fixed the plagiarism issue by getting permission from the original source - who are now cited at the bottom of the list.
106. jfrater - July 23rd, 2008 at 5:37 pm
Hannah: I don’t see any reason they might not have lived at the same time either - nor for Biblical fundamentalist reasons - just the fact that there do seem to be some fossils that would suggest it. Having said that, I haven’t heard the arguments against it yet. Maybe someone can help me - as far as scientific theories are concerned, did man come from the same pool of sludge as the dinosaurs, or did they evolve completely independently after the dinosaurs died?
107. nic - July 23rd, 2008 at 6:09 pm
i keep thinking time travelon 4 and 5
108. lokelani - July 23rd, 2008 at 6:42 pm
“As for the unexplained fossils and metallic objects it does serve to make one wonder whether carbon dating is really accurate and whether “fossil fuels” really aren’t renewable.”
Amen!!!
109. JB - July 23rd, 2008 at 6:47 pm
nic: time travel seems nice… till you see it’s a rudimetary hammer!! I don’t expect time-travellers using that…
the problem with this topic is that when a hoax is debunked never have the same media echo as when is first exposed. People believe in those things proved to be false becouse of this. It’s more difficult to find publications about the fraud.
110. TicoTuanis - July 23rd, 2008 at 6:50 pm
Jfrater about time you mention something with Costa Rica lol
111. JB - July 23rd, 2008 at 6:55 pm
and that’s for Hannah
112. JB - July 23rd, 2008 at 6:57 pm
uhh! There’s a problem with linking in comments
113. Spence425 - July 23rd, 2008 at 7:21 pm
Joshua-
my point wasn’t that what you are saying is incorrect, or the source you are using isn’t trustworthy. all i was saying is that anyone can do an internet search and get a variety of results.
114. Jtradke - July 23rd, 2008 at 7:27 pm
OK, now it’s not plagiarism, but it’s still bullshit. Right there, number 10, “who made them and for what purpose is unknown”. No it’s not known, mainly because nobody made them - they’re natural concretions, which means there is no purpose, they just happened.
And us and dinosaurs did not come from the “same pile of sludge”. We came from a common vertebrate ancestor. We most certainly DID arrive long, long after the dinosaurs, and I defy you to present any fossil evidence of the kind you’ve alluded to. It’s well-evidenced that dinosaurs died off around 65 million years ago, while humans have only been around for around 250,000 years. Some sort of ape was probably coextant with dinosaurs, but certainly not humans.
Hannah - science has not “decided” anything. Science is not some institution which issues decrees based on its members’ politics or beliefs. It is only a method of experimentation, and as such, science has merely been used to discover the age of the earth. If you want to deny the age of the earth, or the truth of evolution, why don’t you doubt the efficacy of penicillin, which was discovered and isolated with science? Surely you don’t turn down anesthetics - all devised via science - when the dentist is drilling? Why, do you even go to the dentist, whose practice of oral health has been refined by the scientific method?
I know you’re baffled; perhaps you should go learn waht others have observed and experimented on, rather than jumping to conclusions based on your naturally biased observations. That’s not an insult; we’re all biased. But science does everything possible to avoid such biases to find the truth, and that is why it succeeds in improving your health, and why it is correct, beyond a reasonable doubt, about such things as fossils and geologic ages.
115. Diogenes - July 23rd, 2008 at 7:29 pm
i read..was it, “in the footsteps of the gods”?..no no “fingerprints” thats it, by G. Hancock. where he postulates the possible pre-extending nature of humanity, myths and the origin of the arts and sciences (and their connecting world travelers) WAY before any majority accepted notions of the course of our historiy(ies). I read it years ago when fueled by such wonderful thoughts.Thrilling adventure novel or has he picked up on something?
I am a dignified moron, so all i say may as well be soaked in a blurry booze of synapses- not all together to be dismissed. but I stop before any good comes of my mind mentalities.
The Piri Reis is a copy of an earlier original?
But hey. The other thing is the current history-housing-museums of..say America. early clearing for the expanse of the new world unearthed many oddities that have found back shelf anomnity for being out of place within the curriculum of the future strengths of our architectural foundations that “just make better sense”.
blah
FROGS IN ROCKS!
yummy
Homer with a donut made for promotion for the movie-right next to- the naked club wielding man with an erection.
I think that even when questionable ideas or findings end up being prooved false or end up found as hoaxes (IF the truth be told, I would prefer hoax over completely misled or false entire) A real good hoax lasts a lifetime or/and beyond..to tingled the part of the ffunny brain that is thirsty for such mobius trips; anomalies of order,ect.
116. Jtradke - July 23rd, 2008 at 7:33 pm
That last sentence should say “correct, beyond a reasonable doubt so far…” This is because via science, things change every so often. As time goes on, scientific theories tend to gain momentum as the evidence piles up behind them, but none are absolute or impervious to change.
117. Clantargh - July 23rd, 2008 at 7:40 pm
The Piri Reis map may have been based on an earlier Chinese map. There is a theory that Chinese explorers discovered America, Greenland, Austrailia, and Antarctica in the years 1420-1421. The Costa Rican spheres are believable. The Ica and Dropa stones are fakes. The rest are interesting anyway.
118. Diogenes - July 23rd, 2008 at 7:53 pm
Clantargh- so, no to the Atlantians or The Giant White Bearded Men Form The Unknown Beyond?
119. jfrater - July 23rd, 2008 at 7:59 pm
JB: I fixed your link - it had too many quotes in it
Jtradke: thanks for your comment on the dinosaur/us/sludge thing - though you could have put it in a less forceful manner - I was asking out of curiosity as I didn’t know the answer - I wasn’t trying to start a war!
120. big ski - July 23rd, 2008 at 8:05 pm
Im sure either science can explain these or there a hoax.Call me very wary and cynical.
121. Tempyra - July 23rd, 2008 at 8:10 pm
jfrater and Hannah: From what I understand man and dinosaur (and all other life) originated from the same pool of sludge, but each form of life took different amounts of time to appear. At the time of the dinosaurs the ancestors of humans were little mammalian creatures that were probably hard-pressed to avoid becoming velociraptor food. As the age of the dinosaurs came to an end the mammalian creatures took the opportunity and thrived - diversifying into the various orders of the class Mammalia. The primate order, over time, gave rise to the hominid species.
That’s my super basic explanation, which may not be totally correct and doesn’t include any dates. Wikipedia has more detailed info, with dates that you can compare to the ones given in the list and your own knowledge of dinosaur history
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_(genus)
122. Clantargh - July 23rd, 2008 at 8:11 pm
I never said no to that. There was likely a tremendous amount of contact between the old and new world pre Columbus. Check this one out
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P.....ic_contact
Most are unsubstantiated of course but this lists several dozen different contacts between the 2 hemispheres. Man became civilized and sophisticated enough for travel and exploration at least 10000 years ago who knows who was where when? We know only a tiny fraction of our world’s history, so sure Atlantis may have existed (pre ice covered Antarctica or less likely a sunken island) and that bearded man has never been disproven.
123. Tempyra - July 23rd, 2008 at 8:15 pm
Jtradke: Sorry, I missed your explanation before I posted mine. Humans and dinosaurs share a common vertebrate ancestor, sure, but all life still originated from the same source - probably the sea (which I was referring to when I said ‘pool of sludge’).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_life
124. Diogenes - July 23rd, 2008 at 8:19 pm
but where did the sea originate from I ask?
125. Diogenes - July 23rd, 2008 at 8:23 pm
so sorry-
I mean
pool of sludge.
I always confuse the two
-muttering I say to myself_
stupid stupid stupid!
I joke.
126. Tempyra - July 23rd, 2008 at 8:27 pm
A combination of hydrogen and oxygen
127. Vera Lynn - July 23rd, 2008 at 8:43 pm
YogiBarristor (63) “…finding out the truth is what living is all about.”
A bit off topic, but it needs to be said again. The Hadron accelerator due to be fired up in a few weeks in Geneva and France, a few quotes from several physicists:
“We are now in a realm of energy that humans have never explored.”
“We don’t even know what to expect.”
“Science is what we do when we don’t know what we’re doing.”
They are talking black holes, extra-dimensions, cosmic plasma, time travel, etc.
People ask why. Because “finding the truth is what living is all about.”
Perfectly worded. Thank you very much.
128. CRSN - July 23rd, 2008 at 8:46 pm
i couldnt see any triceratops on the Ica Stones, there were too many penis’ in the way.
great list Rhyno and JFrater, now on to my own mystery, were did i loose that baggy, oh, found it, down the back of my lounge chair, Sherlock to the rescue.
(slow day)
129. Vera Lynn - July 23rd, 2008 at 8:51 pm
And a fun list,BTW. So what if not all is true, fun to read. Most of what I read (novels, etc) is not true. That’s what makes it fun. JMO
130. CRSN - July 23rd, 2008 at 8:55 pm
Vera Lynn - Its a bit like “Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” answer to life = 42
131. segue - July 23rd, 2008 at 9:12 pm
****
#129. Vera Lynn
So what if not all is true, fun to read. Most of what I read (novels, etc) is not true. That’s what makes it fun. JMO
****
Vera Lynn, most of what I read *is* true, non-fiction, so lists like this one, hoaxes and all, are a pure delight to me!
132. segue - July 23rd, 2008 at 9:15 pm
****
#130. CRSN
“Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” answer to life = 42
****
CRSN, do you know *why* 42 is the answer to life? I’ll tell you if you don’t.
133. CRSN - July 23rd, 2008 at 9:22 pm
Segue - i vaguely remember, i read the series around 8 years ago, but also, with the amount of pot i smoke, my memory is a little rusty, but the upside to that is its like discovering somtething new each time, so i’ll probably read the series again in the next few months, i dont like the recent movie, it brushed out a lot of the finer details that actually made the whole of the story relavent, i do like the series that the BBC did for TV.
134. segue - July 23rd, 2008 at 9:30 pm
The real, the scientific answer, is *NOT* revealed in “Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy”( a set of books I read years ago and loved very much).
At least, I don’t remember the real answer being in the books…
g’nite
135. ObiterDicta - July 23rd, 2008 at 9:31 pm
“The Ark [of the covenant] is considered the greatest of all hidden treasures and its discovery would provide indisputable truth that the Old Testament is hard fact.”
Whoa, whoa, whoa.
Let’s not get carried away, shall we?
Finding the Ark would prove that there is a background of actual events to some parts of the Old Testament, but from there to say that it would prove the whole Old Testament to be “hard fact”?
136. CRSN - July 23rd, 2008 at 9:33 pm
Segue - ah! “i see” said the blind man, catchya later.
137. Vera Lynn - July 23rd, 2008 at 9:42 pm
Segue (131) The book I recommended “Eric” is non-fiction so even more reason you’ll like it. It came up in one of my young adult lit classes I had to take at univ.
One of the best hoaxes I read was a very long time ago about these sisters that would snap their toes under the table. People really thought they were communicating with the dead.
Too funny.
138. emmstein - July 23rd, 2008 at 10:02 pm
#8 the people who made these stones have unusually large penises. now that’s mysterious..
139. CRSN - July 23rd, 2008 at 10:06 pm
138 emmstein - yeah, they probably used them on the triceratops that couldnt be seen in the picture and the stones are their fossilised testicals.
140. Hannah - July 23rd, 2008 at 11:05 pm
Sheesh, like I said, “I’ll probably get ripped apart for this”…
JB and Jtradke, your bias is showing
141. Drogo - July 24th, 2008 at 12:20 am
The impossible fossils reminded me of the electronic device they thought was thousands of years old until they discovered it was a 1920’s era spark plug that ancient dirt had accumulated and stuck or “concreted” onto it making it seem thousands of years old.
Maybe the giant stone balls were the result of ancient sculptors having a competition on who could make the most perfect sphere.
The Ica stones reminded me of a sculpture I visited years ago. Built in the early 1980’s, it was large stones set up to resemble Stonehenge. On the stones were etchings of dinosaurs, and florae(sp?) of prehistoric times. I imagine it might confuse archeologists of the future if they would dig it up.
Readers Digest had a ‘tongue in cheek’ article on “What would future archeologists say if they dug up a motel from the 1970’s” The archeologists thought a TV set was an altar to the gods, and the cars outside the building were metal sculptures dedicated to the gods; Thunderbird, Mustang, Buick, Chrysler, etc..
142. n3ph - July 24th, 2008 at 2:12 am
Regarding nr 10:
The various claims, i.e. Jochmans (1995) and Cremo and Thompson (1993, 1999), that these objects are either “perfectly round” or perfect spheres is now known to be incorrect as directly observed by Heinrich (1997, 2007, 2008). These specimens vary widely in shape, from noticeably flattened spheres to distinct disks. As illustrated by Heinrich (2007), some of the Klerksdorp “spheres” are intergrown with each other, like a mass of soap bubbles. The observations and figure refute claims that these objects are either always spherical or isolated in their occurrence. As noted by Heinrich (2007, 2008), even grooved spheres are not perfect spheres and some consist of intergrown spheres.
Similarly, the claims that these objects consist of metal, i.e. “…a nickel-steel alloy which does not occur naturally…” according to Jochmans (1995), are definitely false as discovered by Cairncross (1988) and Heinrich (2007. 2008). The fact that many of the web pages that make this claim also incorrectly identify the pyrophyllite quarries, from which these objects came, as the “Wonderstone Silver Mine” is evidence that these authors have not bothered to verify the validity of, in this case, misinformation taken from other sources since these quarries are neither known as silver mines nor silver has ever been mined in them in the decades in which they have been in operation (Nel et al. 1937, Lanham 2004).
Heinrich (1996) notes that one of Cremo’s sources regarding the allegedly anomalous spheres was the Weekly World News which he described as “…a [sic] unreliable source of data for discussing the origins of the South African spheres described as used by Forbidden Archeology”. As noted by Cairncross (1988), it appears that the source of the Weekly World News article is Barritt (1982), an article that appeared in a 1982 issue of Scopes Magazine about these objects. Scopes Magazine was a South African tabloid that, like the Weekly World News, cannot be regarded in any way as credible.
Additionally, Roelf Marx, as quoted in Cairncross (1988) and Pope and Cairncross (1988), former curator of the Klerksdorp Museum, reports that he was misquoted in regards to these objects. Marx was quoted in popular articles as saying that the objects rotated by themselves in vibration-free display cases in the Klerksdorp Museum. Instead, Roelf Marx stated that they rotated because of the numerous earth tremors generated by underground blasting in local gold mining. Similarly, inquiries of scientists, who studied these objects, have found that the claims that NASA found these objects to be either perfectly balanced, unnatural, or puzzling are completely unsubstantiated (Heinrich 2008).
Finally, descriptions, i.e. Psybertronist (nd) and Barton (nd), of these spheres being harder than steel are meaningless in terms of the Mohs scale of mineral hardness. Such descriptions are meaningless because depending on either the type of heat treatment, the type of steel alloy, and whether it is case-hardened or not, the hardness of steel can vary quite dramatically. Given that the type of steel is unspecified in these accounts, it is impossible to assign a specific hardness in terms of the Mohs scale of mineral hardness from such an observation and determine whether it indicates them to be abnormally hard. There is a complete lack of any data published in any formal scientific paper, which substantiates that any of these spheres are abnormally hard as implied by such purely anecdotal accounts by non-geologists of these objects being harder than steel.
143. Annunnakike - July 24th, 2008 at 3:15 am
I love this kind of list! Thanks Ryno and Jamie. I already heard of a few on this list, but it’s always fun to read the others. Along with the dropa stones they found approximately 32 crystal skulls, did you know that?
144. colin - July 24th, 2008 at 3:19 am
yay! wicked list mister Frater, once again.
you do such a good job of weeding through all the crap and leaving us with the most interesting stuff:)
this is why you’re the dude who runs the site:)
ok, no more sucking up
145. sarahenity - July 24th, 2008 at 3:40 am
# 101. Petemurrey - i think the greatest mystery is why fremantle can’t win a premiership
you know it makes sense
Im sam Kecovitch
———————-
LOL! freo are terrible… just hearing their song would turn anyone against them.
oh, and i love unsolved mystery lists, they’re always fun
146. Diogenes - July 24th, 2008 at 4:17 am
to #122. Clantargh- about the “Pre-Columbian trans-oceanic contact” link: Interesting pondering indeed… reading through it this morning. I’ve allways had one eyebrow raised with the Viking visit(s) to the pre “American” continent, but haven’t looked into it much.
I was sorta kidding about the Atlantis thing-but the core mystery behind what it means to us, whether real or not- is still great hypothetical thinking or sleuthing–and for the oddball archeological discoveries, I always have as a rather dark joke in the back of my head, a view of the very distant future in which our great museums become bizarre mysteries of pulverized empires spead out under layers of passing eons of time.
147. Twinkle - July 24th, 2008 at 6:52 am
hmm… maybe those fossilized people are the ones in the future who attempted to make a time machine that could travel back, but they forgot to make it travel to the future… ahhaha
148. m2c - July 24th, 2008 at 7:41 am
Quoting: Great list btw. I guess some things just cannot be explained by Science.
This is missing a word: yet.
I also have to say finding the AoC wouldn’t prove that all of the Old Testament was true… just that someone built a box that got described in a book.
149. Idreno - July 24th, 2008 at 10:34 am
Let’s see…some thoughts…
1) I have always questioned the accuracy of geologic and carbon dating…human calculations are not always 100% accurate and are only created to exemplify that which we DO know, rather than that which we don’t. Unless one of the readers was around 20 million years ago to give testament, all pre-historic dates (i.e. anything described as ‘millions’ of years ago) is purely theoretical and neither provable nor disprovable.
2) This is the first time I’ve ever heard of the Dropa Stones…interesting, but seemingly to be a hoax based on probably factual evidence of a one-time pygmie culture in central Asia, which may have died out some time ago.
3)The Ica Stones have not been proven as a hoax…and it’s obvious that any and all engraving on any natural stone is going to be younger than the stone itself. If these stones were preserved in a cave or cavern somewhere, they would not have experienced much erosion. I remember watching a documentary about them where it was said that they were discovered shortly after a small earthquake which opened up and revealed the sealed caves where they were stored. Furthermore, aside from alleging that humans co-existed with dinosaurs (not at all improbable from some points of view), many of the sexual acts depicted are homosexual, as seen in the photograph here, as well as others on the internet. Unless the discoverer himself was a homosexual with intent to bring up an early case of supporting gay rights with ‘ancient’ homosexual depictions, of which I have found no evidence to support as of yet, there is still always the possibility of their authenticity.
4) Brontosaurus was renamed Apatosaurus…it was always considered to be it’s own species.
5) I have significant doubts regarding the Piri Reis map…for whatever reasons, people have spent the past 500 years trying to discredit Colombus for his contribution to WESTERN culture and for having enabled Europeans to colonize and expand culturally in the western hemisphere. No one ever said that he was the first human to step foot in the Americas, but he was the first person to open up exploration to Western societies. Obviously the Native Americans were there first and the Vikings certainly had explored some of the northern areas of the Americas beforehand, but either their information was not recorded or lost/destroyed before it could have been shared.
6) The Ark is said to be kept in Ethiopia under strict guard. I believe in the existence of the Ark, but I don’t necessarily believe that it is in Ethiopia.
7) We need to also remember that various powerful governments always know more about many of these things than they let on about…I’m not going to go into a whole gov’t conspiracy thing, but it’s always a strong and dependable possibility that a lot has been covered up or purposefully dispelled as a hoax for one reason or another.
150. dhily - July 24th, 2008 at 11:07 am
i think UFO’s came for 10 and 9… 4 and 5 might probably some guy who came from the future to do research of the past and dropped something before he left for the future~~ hahaha.. too much hollywood for me..
151. Frodydude - July 24th, 2008 at 12:46 pm
Hey, I was thinking that maybe you could put all of the unsolved mystery lists into one list instead, and just call it “Unsolved Mysteries” and you could add more at anytime, not just when you have a full ten. Also you could put something that links to this whenever you update it instead of just a front page big view. You could have a side bar just for it.
152. kepledon - July 24th, 2008 at 12:58 pm
WHOA BABY
GABBBLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEE
I think a few of these have been disproven.
153. JB - July 24th, 2008 at 2:22 pm
Idreno:
“3)The Ica Stones have not been proven as a hoax…”
In fact is a hoax confessed by its author. Modern pigments have been found on them, as well as sandpaper usage.
The drawings show Dinosaurs that were the most famous on the time the hoax started. Most of them have anatomic mistakes and you can find unchronological spices in the same drawing.
Ok, cranks will now say that those dinosaurs could’ve lived in the same time, I know.
Unhopefully, those cranks have also sabotaged this english wikipedia entry, but you can still read it in spanish one:
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piedras_de_Ica
5) Piri Reis map is presumed to exist. But it was lost long time ago. There’re ald rightings talking about it, and how it was made. The picture in the list claims to be a map “inspired” in it.
And yes. Alexandria fire (accidental, but in war circumstances) was maybe the worst lost in human history, maybe the symbological start of the dark ages. World could be really different with that great source of knowladgment during medieval.
154. segue - July 24th, 2008 at 2:42 pm
I keep looking at those Ica Stones and I can’t find a dinosaur of any kind. Whoever decided *that* must have had one active imagination!
****
153. JB
…In fact is a hoax confessed by its author. Modern pigments have been found on them, as well as sandpaper usage…
****
I have a vague recollection of that, so I’m glad you had a better one! Thank you…now I have a place to start researching (*not* wiki).
I made the most absurd tongue-in-cheek post (#62), re: #5, and no one picked up on it. I’m floored.
Well, maybe not. There is a lot too read, depending on when you came in, and scanning leaves a lot out.
Anyway, JB, thanks.
#130. CRSN - July 23rd, 2008 at 8:55 pm
Vera Lynn - Its a bit like “Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” answer to life = 42
155. segue - July 24th, 2008 at 2:43 pm
CSRN, sheesh….did you remember why the answer is always 42? Or do you want me to tell you?
156. HexenBexen - July 24th, 2008 at 6:47 pm
I was actually given an Ica stone by a friend years ago but I never knew anything about the origin of it (neither did he). As soon as I saw the picture in the list, I recognized it. Cool!
157. CRSN - July 24th, 2008 at 7:02 pm
Petemurrey -
i think the greatest mystery is why fremantle can’t win a premiership
you know it makes sense
Im sam Kecovitch
*****************************************
Petemurrey - wtf is it with the Sam Kecovitch shit and using peter murrey as your name, i mean if that is your name, cool, but stop using that annoying catch phrase from an aussie TV commercial.
and its no mystery why the Dockers cant win a premiership, they are shit, even if the Eagles traded half their team to Freo.
158. CRSN - July 24th, 2008 at 7:14 pm
Seague - yes i do, i got home last night and cheated a little by reading the last couple of pages, now i’m going to have to wait for another 8 years until i can forget the story line.
159. sarahenity - July 24th, 2008 at 7:21 pm
CRSN - and its no mystery why the Dockers cant win a premiership, they are shit, even if the Eagles traded half their team to Freo.
hear, hear.
160. CRSN - July 24th, 2008 at 7:25 pm
sarahenity - i’m realy more in to the rugby union but if i’m going to go watch an AFL game, it has to be the Eagles playing, their recent form slump is a bit of a shame, but a lot of my freinds have played for West Coast, so thats why i support the eagles
161. Francois Tremblay - July 24th, 2008 at 9:00 pm
You forgot the Voynich Manuscript.
162. jfrater - July 24th, 2008 at 9:08 pm
Francois: try Top 10 unsolved mysteries - Voynich is on it
163. Idreno - July 24th, 2008 at 9:46 pm
Based on some further investigation regarding the Ica Stones…I’d like to offer some light on them since there seem to be too many diverse opinions regarding their authenticity even here in the comments.
Firstly, to those who can’t see “dinosaurs” in the above image…the image is of several homosexual acts, but there are thousands of these stones which depict a wide array of images, including dinosaurs contemporaneous with humanoid figures. The stones were discovered by a farmer following some sort of disruption of the earths surface thereby revealing some underground caverns (there is always seismic activity in Peru)…the farmer had begun selling them to people to make money. Dr. Darquea was not the person who ‘discovered’ them and therefore probably never knew exactly where they came from himself. It is HIGHLY unlikely that a poor Peruvian farmer would have either the historical/archeological education or the time and tools to create thousands of these stones. The FARMER, NOT Dr. Darquea, told local police that the stones were a hoax AFTER he was arrested for illegally selling artifacts to tourists.
In most countries that contain preservations of ancient Mayan, Aztec and Incan ruins and artifacts, grave robbing and pilfering of archeological sites is forbidden and a heavily punished crime. Unfortunately, many of the archeologist who go on expeiditions to study many of the tombs and temples are left with little to study because most have been raided or destroyed by decades, possibly centuries, of thieves who sought to sell the ancient relics and artifacts on black markets. This farmer was probably accused of such a thing and therefore just told the police that it was all a hoax so that he would spend the rest of his life in jail. Yeah, it’s that serious of a crime.
Furthermore, not ALL of the stones have been proven as fakes…there are certainly several which, upon close examination, have shown themselves to be less than authentic, but there are many of these stones that are believed to be Pre-Columbian. Unfortunately, once the original stones became public knowledge, obviously plenty of people made forgeries just to make money off of them, knowing that the archeologists would eat them up. At this point, it would be a huge and expensive undertaking to separate the original stones from the forgeries and so will probably be left a mystery.
It is a shame that so many humans are only interested in wealth and fame that they would actually create fake history for personal gain and thereby set back or discredit very important historical discoveries.
164. Tempyra - July 24th, 2008 at 10:09 pm
Idreno:
“It is a shame that so many humans are only interested in wealth and fame that they would actually create fake history for personal gain and thereby set back or discredit very important historical discoverie