Top 10 Albums That Were Hated On Release But Became Classics

The music world is full of stories about misunderstood albums that critics and fans initially rejected but later embraced as groundbreaking masterpieces. These musical revelations often challenged conventions, arrived ahead of their time, or marked such dramatic departures from artists’ previous work that listeners simply weren’t ready for them. The journey from commercial disappointment to celebrated classic reveals how profoundly our perceptions of art can transform over time. From experimental rock ventures to genre-defining statements, these albums demonstrate that initial reception hardly determines lasting impact. Critics can be spectacularly wrong, audiences can be slow to catch on, and sometimes an album requires years, even decades, for its true significance to be recognized, and each record on this list underwent a remarkable transformation in reputation, evolving from critical or commercial failure to essential listening that influenced generations of musicians.

Related: 10 Underrated Songs No One Will Agree On

10The Velvet Underground & Nico (1967)

The Velvet Underground’s debut album with German vocalist Nico bombed spectacularly when it dropped in 1967, barely scraping to Number 199 on the Billboard charts. Critics found its experimental sound and taboo subjects like drug use and sexual deviance too “abrasive” to handle, as it was just too far outside what people thought pop music should be. To make matters worse, Verve Records barely promoted it, and then had to recall it due to legal issues. Lou Reed later quipped that while hardly anyone bought the album initially, “everyone who did formed a band.” That pretty much sums up how this commercial flop managed to become one of the most influential rock albums ever made, inspiring countless artists who would take decades to fully catch up to its groundbreaking vision.

9Pet Sounds by The Beach Boys (1966)

When Brian Wilson unveiled his orchestral-pop masterpiece Pet Sounds in 1966, fans expecting more surfing anthems were totally confused by all the introspective lyrics and complex arrangements. Despite having hits like “Wouldn’t It Be Nice” and “Sloop John B,” the album tanked commercially, becoming the Beach Boys’ worst performing LP up to that point. All those sophisticated production tricks, weird instruments, and vulnerable themes? Way over everyone’s heads at the time. Fast-forward fifty years, and Pet Sounds is universally hailed as a game-changing achievement that influenced everyone from the Beatles (directly inspiring Sgt. Pepper) to pretty much every ambitious pop artist since. Talk about a major turnaround.

8Exile on Main St. by The Rolling Stones (1972)

The Stones’ sprawling double album Exile on Main St. got a pretty lukewarm reception when it landed in 1972. Critics found it messy and unfocused, especially compared to their earlier albums. Recorded in the dank basement of Keith Richards’ French villa while they were basically hiding from British tax collectors, the album’s murky production and wild genre-hopping between blues, country, rock, and soul left both reviewers and fans scratching their heads. What’s now considered its greatest strength, that raw, unpolished sound, was seen as its biggest flaw back then. But over time, people started to appreciate its gritty authenticity and genre-blending approach as capturing the very essence of rock and roll. These days, Exile consistently ranks among the greatest albums ever made and stands as the definitive Stones record—pretty incredible considering how many people initially shrugged it off.

7Weezer’s Pinkerton (1996)

After their massively successful “Blue Album” debut, Weezer took a darker, more personal turn with Pinkerton, and boy did they get punished for it. Critics and fans alike absolutely trashed it when it came out in 1996. Rolling Stone readers even voted it the third worst album of the year, and the backlash hit frontman Rivers Cuomo so hard that he publicly called the record “a hideous mistake.” The rough production, uncomfortably honest lyrics about sexual frustration, and abandonment of their radio-friendly power-pop formula was just too much for people expecting more singalong hits. But something weird happened over the next decade, a passionate cult following developed around the album, connecting deeply with its emotional rawness. By the early 2000s, the same publications that had ripped it to shreds were now hailing it as a misunderstood emo masterpiece that had influenced a whole generation of introspective rock bands. Now it’s many fans’ favorite Weezer album, talk about a 180-degree turn.

6Led Zeppelin’s Debut Album (1969)

When Led Zeppelin dropped their self-titled debut in 1969, critics absolutely savaged it. Rolling Stone infamously dismissed them as a second rate Jeff Beck Group, questioning whether they had any original ideas at all. Other writers called their heavy blues-rock sound derivative and way too over the top. But here’s the thing, actual listeners loved it right from the start. The record’s massive commercial success quickly made those negative reviews look pretty silly, though critics stayed stubborn for years. As Zeppelin’s massive influence on rock became impossible to deny, their debut gradually got recognized for what it was, the blueprint for hard rock and heavy metal, packed with timeless tracks like “Good Times Bad Times,” “Dazed and Confused,” and “Communication Breakdown.” Now it’s considered one of the most important debut albums ever made, which just goes to show how little critics sometimes understand about what will actually connect with people.

5Kanye West’s 808s & Heartbreak (2008)

When Kanye ditched rapping for Auto-Tuned singing over sparse electronic beats on 808s & Heartbreak, fans and critics alike were like, “What is he doing?” Released in 2008 after his mother died and he went through a brutal breakup, the album’s raw emotional vulnerability and stripped-down sound was nothing like the maximalist production people expected from him. Everyone rushed to call it a misguided experiment, mocking Kanye’s singing and the album’s cold, mechanical feel. Fast forward a few years, though, and suddenly the album’s innovative blend of hip-hop, electronic music, and R&B was inspiring a whole new wave of artists like Drake, The Weeknd, and Frank Ocean. What seemed like Kanye going off the rails turned out to be one of the most influential albums of the 21st century, basically creating the emotional, confessional blueprint that would dominate hip-hop and R&B for the next decade. Sometimes the weirdest creative left turns end up changing everything.

4Black Sabbath’s Self-Titled Debut (1970)

Black Sabbath got absolutely destroyed by reviewers when it came out in 1970. Critics dismissed the band as a poor man’s Cream, completely missing what made their sound so revolutionary. Released as the hippie era was fading, the album’s dark themes about the occult, war, and apocalyptic doom, combined with Tony Iommi’s down-tuned guitar and the band’s menacing sound, felt like a direct attack on the peace and love vibes still dominating rock criticism. One particularly harsh review called Ozzy’s vocals “discordant and detrimental to any musical progression.” Ouch. But while critics were busy hating, working class kids were falling in love with something that finally spoke to their reality, something heavier and darker than mainstream rock offered. As heavy metal grew into a global force, Black Sabbath got reappraised as the genre’s founding document, with practically every metal band since naming the album as their primary inspiration. Not bad for a record that critics initially treated like garbage.

3Paul and Linda McCartney’s Ram (1971)

After the Beatles split, Paul McCartney’s second solo effort Ram, recorded with his wife Linda, got absolutely ripped apart by critics who called it trivial, lightweight, and even “embarrassingly bad.” John Lennon particularly hated it, seeing certain songs as direct shots at him, which only made the critical pile-on worse. The album’s homespun, whimsical quality and domestic themes seemed disappointingly frivolous coming from an ex-Beatle. Rolling Stone’s brutal review labeled it “monumentally irrelevant” and “the nadir in the decomposition of Sixties rock thus far.” However, Ram has undergone one of the most dramatic critical turnarounds in rock history. Its quirky production techniques, melodic brilliance, and charming oddball quality now look visionary, with tons of indie and alternative artists citing it as a major influence. By the 2010s, when the album got a deluxe rerelease, the same critics who trashed it were calling it a misunderstood masterpiece and one of McCartney’s finest moments. Sometimes it just takes 40 years for people to catch up.

2Fleetwood Mac’s Tusk (1979)

After Rumours became a monster hit, Fleetwood Mac took a huge creative gamble with Tusk, a sprawling double album that cost a ridiculous $1 million to produce (in 1979 dollars). Lindsey Buckingham’s experimental approach left fans bewildered, as they wanted Rumours part two, not this weird artistic statement. While it still hit #4 on the charts, it sold nowhere near what its predecessor did, leading everyone to label it a commercial flop and self-indulgent mess. Critics couldn’t decide what to make of it, with many bashing its lack of cohesion and apparent shortage of “radio friendly” material beyond the title track. Warner Bros. was so disappointed that they actually blamed the album’s underperformance on people sharing it on cassette tapes. But as time passed, Tusk gradually earned recognition as Fleetwood Mac’s most daring and creative work, with its eclectic, risk-taking approach winning love from musicians and critics who now see it as hugely influential on modern indie rock. Sometimes the “commercial disappointments” age the best.

1Lou Reed’s Metal Machine Music (1975)

No album better shows the journey from “universally despised” to “visionary masterpiece” than Lou Reed’s Metal Machine Music. When this double album of pure guitar feedback and processed noise hit shelves in 1975, people thought it was either a practical joke or Reed deliberately trying to get out of his record contract. Critics were completely baffled and furious, with many assuming Reed released it specifically to get rid of the mainstream fans who liked his more accessible stuff. RCA quickly pulled it from their catalog after angry customers kept returning it. Reed himself couldn’t even decide what to say about it, sometimes calling it serious avant-garde composition, other times shrugging it off as just a joke. Fast forward a few decades, and Metal Machine Music has been completely reframed as a groundbreaking work that paved the way for industrial music, noise rock, and experimental electronics. These days, avant-garde composers and musicians cite it as a brave artistic statement that pushed the boundaries of what music could be. Not bad for an album that most people initially thought was just Lou Reed giving the middle finger to his record label.