10 Weird Religious Practices
- Published August 13, 2007 - 305 Comments
Most religions have one or two unusual practices or devices but occasionally you find one which is just completely weird. This list contains ten of the more unusual things found in modern religions.
1. Mormom Temple Garments Wikipedia
In some denominations of the Latter Day Saint movement, the temple garment (or the Garment of the Holy Priesthood, or informally, the garment or garments) is a set of sacred underclothing worn by adult adherents who have taken part in a ritual ceremony known as washing and anointing ordinance, usually in a temple as part of the Endowment ceremony. Adherents consider them to be sacred and may be offended by public discussion of the garments. Anti-Mormon activists have publicly displayed or defaced temple garments to show their opposition to the LDS Church.
According to generally-accepted Mormon doctrine, the marks in the garments are sacred symbols (Buerger 2002, p. 58). One proposed element of the symbolism, according to early Mormon leaders, was a link to the “Compass and the Square”, the symbols of freemasonry (Morgan 1827, pp. 22-23), to which Joseph Smith (creator of Mormonism) had been initiated about seven weeks prior to his introduction of the Endowment ceremony.
2. Scientology E-Meter Wikipedia

An E-meter is an electronic device manufactured by the Church of Scientology at their Gold Base production facility. It is used as an aid by Dianetics and Scientology counselors and counselors-in-training in some forms of auditing, the application of the techniques of Dianetics and Scientology to another or to oneself for the express purpose of addressing spiritual issues.
E-meter sessions are conducted by church employees known as auditors. Scientology materials traditionally refer to the subject as the “preclear,” although auditors continue to use the meter well beyond the clear level. The preclear holds a pair of cylindrical electrodes (“cans”) connected to the meter while the auditor asks the preclear a series of questions and notes both the verbal response and the activity of the meter. Auditor training describes many types of needle movements, with each having their own special significance.
A 1971 ruling of the United States District Court, District of Columbia (333 F. Supp. 357), specifically stated, “The E-meter has no proven usefulness in the diagnosis, treatment or prevention of any disease, nor is it medically or scientifically capable of improving any bodily function.”
3. Exorcism Cogitz
Exorcism is the practice of evicting demons or other evil spiritual entities from a person or place which they are believed to have possessed (taken control of). The practice is quite ancient and still part of the belief system of many religions, though it is seen mostly in the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches.
Solemn exorcisms, according to the Canon law of the church, can only be exercised by an ordained priest (or higher prelate), with the express permission of the local bishop, and only after a careful medical examination to exclude the possibility of mental illness. The Catholic Encyclopaedia (1908) enjoined: “Superstition ought not to be confounded with religion, however much their history may be interwoven, nor magic, however white it may be, with a legitimate religious rite”.
To listen to two authentic recordings of exorcisms, visit the Top 10 Incredible Recordings. For more audio, video, and images of excorcisms, you can go here.
4. Jewish Kaparot (כפרות) Wikipedia
Kaparot is a traditional Jewish religious ritual that takes place around the time of the High Holidays. Classically, it is performed by grasping a live chicken by the sholder blades and moving around one’s head three times, symbolically transferring one’s sins to the chicken. The chicken is then slaughtered and donated to the poor, preferably eaten at the pre-Yom Kippur feast. In modern times, Kapparos is performed in the traditional form mostly in Haredi communities. The ritual is preceded by the reading of Psalms 107:17-20 and Job 33:23-24.
On the eve of Yom Kippur 2005, more than 200 caged chickens were abandoned in rainy weather as part of a Kaparot operation in Brooklyn, NY; some of these starving and dehydrated chickens were subsequently rescued by the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Jacob Kalish, an Orthodox Jew from Williamsburg, was charged with animal cruelty for the drowning deaths of 35 of these chickens. In response to such reports of the mistreatment of chickens, animal rights organizations have begun to picket public observances of kaparot, particularly in Israel.
5. Shamanism Wikipedia

Shamanism refers to a range of traditional beliefs and practices concerned with communication with the spirit world. There are many variations in shamanism throughout the world, though there are some beliefs that are shared by all forms of shamanism. Its practitioners claim the ability to diagnose and cure human suffering and, in some societies, the ability to cause suffering. This is believed to be accomplished by traversing the axis mundi and forming a special relationship with, or gaining control over, spirits.
Shamans have been credited with the ability to control the weather, divination, the interpretation of dreams, astral projection, and traveling to upper and lower worlds. Shamans were used in Tibetan Buddhism as a form of divination by which the Dalai Lama was given prophesies of the future and advice.
6. Dowry Wikipedia

This is a cultural practice rather than a religious one. The practice of dowry exists across India. Despite laws against it, the practice continues. The girl child’s dowry and wedding expenses often sends her family into a huge debt trap. As consumerism and wealth increase in India, dowry demands are growing. In rural areas, families sell their land holdings, while the urban poor sell their houses.
To curb the practice of dowry, the government of India made several laws detailing severe punishment to anyone demanding dowry and a law in Indian Penal Code (Section 498A) has been introduced. While it gives boost to a woman and her family, it in the same time also put a man and his family in a great disadvantage. Misuse of this law by women in urban India and many incidents of extortion of money from the husband done by the wife and her family (this is called sowry) have come to light.
7. Mormon Baptism of the Dead Wikipedia
Baptism for the dead, vicarious baptism or proxy baptism is a religious practice of baptising a living person on behalf of an individual who is dead; the living person is acting as the deceased person’s proxy. It has been practiced since 1840 in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints where it is also called temple baptism because it is performed only in dedicated temples.
In the practice of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, a living person, acting as proxy, is baptized by immersion on behalf of a deceased person of the same gender. The baptism ritual is as follows: after calling the living proxy by name, the person performing the baptism says, “Having been commissioned of Jesus Christ, I baptize you for and in behalf of [full name of deceased person], who is dead, in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.” The proxy is then immersed briefly in the water. Baptism for the dead is a distinctive ordinance of the church and is based on the belief that baptism is a required ordinance for entry into the Kingdom of God.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints vicariously baptizes people regardless of race, sex, or creed. This includes both victims and perpetrators of genocide. Some Jewish survivors of the Holocaust and their supporters have objected to this practice.
8. Jainist Digambaras Wikipedia
Digambar also spelled Digambara is one of the two main sects of Jainism. Senior Digambar monks wear no clothes, following the practice of Lord Mahavira. They do not consider themselves to be nude — they are wearing the environment. Digambaras believe that this practice represents a refusal to give in to the body’s demands for comfort and private property — only Digambara ascetics are required to forsake clothing. Digambara ascetics have only two possessions: a peacock feather broom and a water gourd.
The native Jain communities of Maharashta, Bundelkhand (MP/UP), Karnataka, Tamil Nadu are all Digambaras. In north India, the Saravagis and the Agrawals are also Digambaras. In Gujarat and Southern Rajasthan, the majority of Jains follow the Svetambara tradition, although some Jain communities of these regions like the Humad are also Digambaras.
9. Islamic Niqab (نِقاب) Wikipedia

A niqab is a veil which covers the face, worn by some Muslim women as a part of sartorial hijab. It is popular in the Arab countries of the Persian Gulf but it can also be found in North Africa, Southeast Asia and the Indian subcontinent.
The niqab is regarded differently by the various schools of Islamic jurisprudence known as madhahab. Some see it as obligatory, or fard , while others see it as recommended, or mustahab, and a few see it as forbidden. The majority of scholars believe hijab is required, but only a few see niqab as required, although this is not the common perception among the general population.
10. Jehovah’s Witnesses Refusal of Blood Transfusions Wikipedia

A fundamental doctrine of the Jehovah’s Witnesses teaches that the Bible prohibits consumption, storage and transfusion of blood, including in cases of emergency. This doctrine was introduced in 1945, and has been elaborated upon since then. Although accepted by a majority of Jehovah’s Witnesses, evidence indicates a minority does not wholly endorse this doctrine. Facets of the doctrine have drawn praise and criticism from both members of the medical community and Jehovah’s Witnesses alike.
In 1964, Jehovah’s Witnesses were prohibited from obtaining transfusions for pets, from using fertilizer containing blood, and were even encouraged to write to dog food manufacturers to verify that their products were blood-free. Later that year, Jehovah’s Witnesses doctors and nurses were instructed to withhold blood transfusions from fellow Jehovah’s Witnesses. As to administering transfusions to non-members, The Watchtower stated that such a decision is “left to the Christian doctor’s own conscience.”

















August 13th, 2007 at 3:23 pm
How about Christians symbolically eating Jesus’ body and and drinking his blood? Thats always seemed weird to me, why would they want to do that?
August 13th, 2007 at 3:37 pm
No circumcision?
August 13th, 2007 at 3:40 pm
Indian dowry is not religious ceremony. Do damn research before posting it.
August 13th, 2007 at 3:43 pm
The practice that Chris is referring to is known as communion. You can get a full breakdown on WikiPedia. It was a commandment of Jesus at the last supper, and it is to commemorate the manner in which Jesus would die.
He said as often as they met, they should take communion in remembrance of Him.
There is some difference between Protestants and Catholics on this issue: Catholics believe that communion is transformed in the hands of the priest to the literal body and blood of Christ, while Protestants take it to be a symbolic gesture.
August 13th, 2007 at 3:46 pm
Chris: It was toss up between that and Exorcism; exorcism won.
August 13th, 2007 at 3:47 pm
“you are a fool” – it is included because the majority of practitioners are Hindu. For the same reason we can add the Burka of the Muslims – it is not an obligation of the religion specifically but is a traditional practice predominant in Islam.
August 13th, 2007 at 4:19 pm
As a Hindu, listing ‘dowry’ as a ‘religious’ practice makes me laugh!
August 13th, 2007 at 4:34 pm
With regard to baptism for the dead, check 1 Corinthians 15:29, where, in a discussion regarding resurrection for all as a result of Christ’s victory over death, Paul explains that all must be resurrected. In support of his position, he asks: “Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? why are they then baptized for the dead?” This is a reflection of Mormon belief that baptism is essential for salvation (as Jesus explained to Nicodemus), and that God is merciful and allows all people the opportunity to receive baptism, even if not given the opportunity in this life (i.e., and including, those who have lived in parts of the world where there was never an opportunity to gain knowledge of Christ’s atonement for sin). This is really a manifestation of Mormon belief in God’s justice and mercy.
With regard to Mormon garments from the temple, stating that they are weird is oversimplistic. Rather than wearing a cross necklace or Christian T-shirts, Mormons wear the garments as a reminder to them of certain covenants they have made with God, including covenants to be honest in their dealings with their fellow men and to maintain fidelity in marriage. I’m not sure whether you think that is weird simply because they are worn under the clothes rather than outside for all to see.
August 13th, 2007 at 4:47 pm
Daniel: Thanks for the comment. Regarding Baptism of the Dead, I think that the fact that no Christian group practised this until the LDS Church was created by Smith puts a real shadow of doubt on the doctrine. Additionally, the Biblical verse itself when read in the context of the whole Epistle does not support the view. Let me quote Reed and Farkas:
August 13th, 2007 at 5:19 pm
In regard to people being baptized for the dead (I Cor. 15:29), the verse is a question regarding their line of reasoning. If they didn’t believe in the resurrection of the dead, they weren’t being consistent in their reasoning. The verse does not condone the practice. This doctrine of baptizing for the dead violates many other verses in the Bible. Apparently, even though they didn’t believe in the resurrection, they were erroneously baptizing for the dead. Heb. 9:27 states “Just as man is destined to die once and after that to face judgment …” No more chances!
August 13th, 2007 at 5:25 pm
Hello one and all,
I feel that it is worth adding that exorcism is also common to Islam. What’s more there are a whole subset of supplications (du’a) intended to guard one’s property and/or self from the influences of the unseen (Jinn, Shaitan (plural)) (which may or may not be evil.).
I recall seeing a clip of an alleged exorcism carried out in indonesia. If you are curious you might want to try to find it on youtube.
Allah hafiz,
jcw
August 13th, 2007 at 5:28 pm
what about taoist practices?
August 13th, 2007 at 5:30 pm
John Waters: I have seen an Islamic exorcism on youtube so it is definitely there.
thedude: Want to name some odd ones for us?
August 13th, 2007 at 5:45 pm
jfrater: Thanks, I was not sure and I can’t hit youtube from work. I am also unwilling to use a proxy or torpark
.
August 13th, 2007 at 5:46 pm
John: no prob
August 13th, 2007 at 5:51 pm
Good post!
Makes we wanna be a Digambaras, and less like “dumbass” …who cares if dowry isn’t a religion? The rest was info that more people should learn more about. Keeps us from becoming ignorant.
August 13th, 2007 at 5:55 pm
Dowry is not particular to Hindus, it is common in Sikh families and Muslim families in India and Pakistan. It is not Hindu but more a preponderance of the people of the Indian subcontinent.
August 13th, 2007 at 7:06 pm
it still seems to me to be the most retarded inhumane thing on earth…the hindu caste system has to be number 1 …
untouchables? ..really ????
August 13th, 2007 at 7:07 pm
There are some notable differences in dowery in muslims from the subcontinent.
1) The dowery is paid from the husband to the wife. Not the wife’s family. The bride’s family has no right to her dowery. If a muslim or muslim family disagrees with this, they are in error.
2) Contrary to practice among american muslims (I, being an american muslim married to a desi woman, have no experience with other groups of muslims), the dowery can be prohibativly expensive. Payment is frequently postponed partially or in full, rendering the husband in debt to his wife.
3) It is also common for the sisters and unmarried female cousins to bribe the husband on the night of the wedding and “mehndi” (kind-of a pre wedding shower for both families) by either stealing his shoes or grabbing his finger. In my case it was both…
(ugh)
They also cram super dense desi sweets down your throat. I swear to this day I get physically ill when I see a laddoo. Desis of other faiths also engage in this pancreas-destroying practice.
As for the Jains, I was studying religion for years before converting to Islam. My less than objective conclusions of their faith is that it seemed intriguing but ultimately it was just too much of a sausage fest for my tastes…
August 13th, 2007 at 7:30 pm
John Waters – Converting from one religion to other only shows that you never knew any religion to begin with and hence will never know any other!
I laugh on you.
August 13th, 2007 at 7:42 pm
Harshal: gee – that was a bit mean.
August 13th, 2007 at 7:53 pm
Another satisfied customer!
Seriously, though, our intrepid H1-B in waiting needs to brush up on his ESL a bit more before attempting such ad hominem attacks on folks.
I must add that my jibe on the Digambaray was:
1) intended to be in jest and was friendly in nature.
2) based on the (in hindsight dubious) assumption that they would not get their non-existant panties in a bunch over such a statement.
August 14th, 2007 at 1:11 am
Hindus – body piercing on Deepavali
Shias and Catholics – self-flaggelation
Catholics in Philipines – ritual crucifixion
Dervishes
Chinese – Food offering to the dead, burning hell money, paper TV, houses
Western observer: how do you really expect the dearly-departed to receive all these money, TV and houses that you burn?
Chinese: The same way you expect your dead to smell flowers
August 14th, 2007 at 4:03 am
Here’s something Hindus are happy not to talk about anymore:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suttee
And to all the Hindu zealots here, what about Devadasis and failed attempts to mitigate the abominable practice?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devadasi
Sure, stand up for your belief… but also acknowledge what’s fucked up.
And “body piercing on Deepavali”…? WTF? SOME of us only do that on Kali-related festivals…
August 14th, 2007 at 4:12 am
Those are all sorts of weird, though what does that scientologist’s machine really do?
August 14th, 2007 at 5:56 am
Dowry has nothing to do with those hindus or their religion. It is an Indian thing and a community thing. In our community (Syrian Christian) this is also common practice. My muslim bretheren also have this.
August 14th, 2007 at 6:54 am
The scientology machines measure the number of dead alien souls you are dragging around with you, I believe.
August 14th, 2007 at 7:32 am
Jennifer: I believe you are right. Utterly crazy. I think the aliens are called Body Thetans.
August 14th, 2007 at 8:33 am
anyone else like the jainist picture? hahahaha j/p
August 14th, 2007 at 2:41 pm
Jerusalemexporthouse:
The E-Meter is really a simplified polygraph (I suppose it can be considered a monograph). It measures skin conductivity. In other words, it detects sweaty palms. The idea is that the “auditor” asks the scientology candidte (“the mark”) questions and records the value of resistance from the e-meter. In theory (their theory) your “thetan level”, or the amount of influece the brainwashed alien soul inhabiting your body influences you, can be determined and you can be scheduled to purge this influence for a “nominal fee”.
There is a southpark episode that covers all of this and more, you should see if you can find a copy either online or on your p2p network of choice.
Also, check out xenu.net for more information regarding scientologies dubious practices/beliefs.
August 14th, 2007 at 2:46 pm
One more thing about the E-Meter:
Write William S. Burroughs was a big fan of early scientology and wrote at length about the e-meter concept. He later recanted his position regarding scietology once he realized that L. Ron Hubbard was a grifter. He continued to experiment with the E-Meter on his own. I believe that Brion Gyson also shared some of this enthusiasm.
For the record I think that the whole thing is a sham, and am in no way supportive of the “church” of scientology. A’udhu billah
August 14th, 2007 at 5:06 pm
John: In one of the Burroughs’ short films he makes mention of auditing. It must have been produced at that time. Burroughs was definitely interested in some weird stuff in his lifetime. He is one of my all time favourite authors and I own all of his novels.
August 14th, 2007 at 6:05 pm
“Burroughs was definitely intersted in some weird stuff in his lifetime.” is quite possibly the biggest understatement that I have ever seen on a web forum.
Have you bought his boxed set of CD’s from Giordano Poetry Systems? It’s amazing. The last disc has a few hours of his experimental “cut up” recordings. People talk about negativeland or EBN being revolutionary… Burroughs was doing it almost half a century prior.
August 14th, 2007 at 6:36 pm
John: no – I didn’t know it was about actually. I have only seen his videos on youtube and read his novels. I will have to add it to my wishlist!
August 15th, 2007 at 5:46 am
My step dad indirectly gave me an explanation of scientology…that religion makes absolutely no sense at all…
August 15th, 2007 at 3:41 pm
Fruckert: Frequently such is the case with cults that feature secret or protected doctrines.
August 17th, 2007 at 12:50 am
Do some more research on the Jehovah’s Witnesses and their views of blood transfusions. The dog food and fertilizer thing actually made me laugh out loud. Actually the whole second paragraph is untrue.
August 17th, 2007 at 9:04 am
LB: how well do you know your religion? The second paragraph comes from The JW magazine The Watchtower, February 15, 1964, p. 127-128.
August 17th, 2007 at 2:12 pm
Personally I find suicide bombing that kills civilians kinda weird. Maybe that’s just me.
August 17th, 2007 at 2:36 pm
Chipper: suicide bombing is not specifically a religious practice. It is an evil thing, I agree, but is not specifically a traditional aspect of any religion. And I think to label it “weird” degrades the true horror of what it is.
August 18th, 2007 at 3:09 pm
#5 is interesting. a shaman getting a blowjob!
August 18th, 2007 at 3:27 pm
kitchenrat: haha I didn’t notice that.
August 18th, 2007 at 9:20 pm
Only 10 weird religious practices?? How about ALL religious practices. Every one invented by man, and every one totally nuts. Every. Stinkin’. One.
August 18th, 2007 at 11:53 pm
Mormon Theology the whole religion is weird.
I’ll second iremon “Only 10 weird religious practices??”
August 19th, 2007 at 12:25 am
It’s all loony.
At least pagans have more fun.
Steve
August 19th, 2007 at 7:49 am
Steve: unless you are on the receiving end of a human sacrifice
August 19th, 2007 at 9:23 am
Someone above mentioned weird Taoist religious practices. While I do know that they exist,
I’ve always seen Taoism as more a philosophical thing, rather than as something more religiously prescriptive. While it can be used religiously, I don’t think it has to be in order for one to get benefit from it. I think one can adopt some measure of Taoism into one’s life, and be completely free of religion at the same time.
I’m a passive atheist, for example, but I embrace some Taoist thinking as I find it directly in the Tao Te Ching (Dao De Jing).
I see a lot of people expressing anger over the general concept of any sort of religious practice, and I wonder why it is they do so. While some are certainly frustrating, especially from the perspective of an outsider or uninformed person, all the vitriol doesn’t do anyone any favours whatever. If, for example, you are throwing off the mantle of Catholicism, and spend your time griping about the Church, what that says to me is that you are allowing the Church to remain in control of you. Hardly logical for something you say you aren’t a part of anymore.
If you’re letting something go, just let it go. Go on to the next thing.
Sorry for the novel. It’s a topic near and dear to my heart. I spend a lot of time trying my best to emphasize to people that atheism isn’t about hatred, though many who hate call themselves such. And, to label an entire section of human culture as useless, weird, wrong, or otherwise, is more than a little juvenile and narrow of vision.
August 19th, 2007 at 11:14 am
laf: thanks for that well written comment. It is a good contribution to the topic!
August 19th, 2007 at 7:38 pm
John Waters: can you send me an email (jamie@frater.com) please?
August 21st, 2007 at 7:18 pm
Mormom?
August 21st, 2007 at 8:00 pm
arandaphobic: wow – that is interesting.
August 22nd, 2007 at 4:18 am
The refusal to accept blood is scripturally sound and is hardly “weird.” Witnesses have encouraged entire hospital programs to examine bloodless surgery and blood alternatives, which is medically superior to surgery and procedures involving blood, and is safer. I can understand why some may see that as strange, since it often casts the impression that Witnesses don’t care about their health or wellbeing. But, that’s far from the truth. Abstaining from blood is a scriptural point, since blood is sacred to God, and it represents life.
August 22nd, 2007 at 7:47 am
Weird (horrible) religious practice #1:
Hindu ritual of Sati. Ritual suicide or murder of a widow on her husband’s funeral pyre. Outlawed completely many years ago, but from time to time, one still hears of it.
See wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sati_%28practice%29
Warren
August 22nd, 2007 at 8:15 am
Ben: “It shall be a perpetual statute throughout your generations, in all your dwelling places, that you eat neither fat nor blood” (Lev. 3:17) – why do JW’s eat fat? If the anti-blood laws in the Bible are what the JWs think, surely fat is the same then?
Also, even the most orthodox Jews who follow all of the old dietary laws do not consider the law against eating blood (it refers to animal blood incidentally, not human) to prohibit blood transfusions.
Also, the Old Testament dietary laws simply don’t apply to Christians today (cf. Col. 2:16–17, 22), and the ones given at the Council of Jerusalem passed into disuse as Jewish conversions to Christianity became uncommon toward the end of the first century and the Church became mainly Gentile. They weren’t immutable doctrines, but disciplinary rules. Remember, Christ said that it is not what goes into the mouth that is dirty, but that which comes out. He abolished the traditional Jewish dietary laws.
August 22nd, 2007 at 8:16 am
warren: Sati is mentioned in the Top 10 Bizarre Traditions
August 22nd, 2007 at 7:25 pm
jfrater, while witnesses do adhere to principles in the mosaic law, they are not strict followers of the mosaic law. In the christian greek scriptures (new testament) there are many mentions of not using blood ( including acts 15:20)
August 22nd, 2007 at 10:45 pm
Emily: sure – though I think the entire Christian world (except Witnesses) seems to regard those verses as relating to consumption of animal blood (which, incidentally, is not forbidden – it was (like the old testament command) a disciplinary rule – that is why black pudding has long been a staple food of Western Christendom) and not to the transfusion of human blood. I just can’t be convinced that Russell had a clue when he was “interpreting” the bible – he lied on the stand about his knowledge of Greek and the wheat scandal doesn’t help either. I own a copy of the Russell version of the bible and some of the translations from Greek are quite horrifically wrong.
August 26th, 2007 at 5:10 pm
Considering the variety of diseases that are transmittable by blood, but too expensive to screen for, not taking blood transfusions doesn’t sound so weird. More and more hospitals around the country are developing bloodless surgery units, and not for just JWs. But because they think it is good medicine and more and more people are requesting it. Jackson Memorial and Baptist Health Systems are just two examples in the South Florida area. And as for Russell, if he did lie, so did the Apostle Peter when he denied Christ. Don’t hold a person’s mistakes over the entire body of good work that they did. We all lie.
And the command to abstain from blood, was given to Noah after the leaving the ark. To the Israelite nation, as well as to the early Christian congregation as recorded in Acts. With all of the symbolism attached to blood in the Bible, even Jesus speaks of his blood in symbolic terms, it is safe to make the conclusion that more than dietary rules were being commanded. Blood had sin-atoning value. Hence its preciousness. And its use in sacrifice. Life itself is in the blood.
August 27th, 2007 at 12:59 am
Aaron: in all western hospitals blood is checked before being used for transfusions. Also, the biblical laws against taking blood were against animal blood – not transfusions. As I said in a comment above, even the most orthodox Jews allow transfusions. And St. Peter’s denial of Christ is quite different from what Russell did – he lied for profit – St Peter lied to save his life.
Also, as I also said above (you should read the comments – they are quite interesting) Christ said that it is not what goes into the mouth which is dirty but that which comes out – the early Christians considered this to be the eradication of dietary laws – hence it is now okay to eat blood. The first time any group splitting from Christianity decided otherwise was with Russell.
Thanks for posting as debate is good, but I do think we can all benefit from some research in to what the original groups believed about these commandments rather than trying to make up our own doctrines later without sufficient knowledge of the past.
August 27th, 2007 at 9:06 am
Acts 15:28,29 says to ‘abstain … from blood’. That would include eating animal blood. Christians are not free to eat blood. And yes, blood is checked. But they don’t check for everything. They can’t. There are plenty of non-blood alternatives and techniques. Also respected medical institutions have non-blood surgery units. So the refusals of blood transfusions are really a non-issue. Doctors are more and more becoming confident in using the latest blood saving techniques to reduce blood loss such as the cell saver, which captures lost blood and recirculates it back into the body.
King David was an adulterer and murderer. But God forgave him. Is the alleged lying worse than that? God doesn’t hold sins against a person if they are repentant. It isn’t the nature of the sin that is as deadly as the person’s attitude about that sin. If all God saw was sin, none of us would be approved.
And that “lying for profit” accusation is totally unsubstantiated. He was running a non-profit Bible publishing organization. This is also outside the criticism of this weird religion list.
Funny how it’s alway the other guy who doesn’t really understand things? Please refrain from unprovoked attacks, false accusations, hearsay, libel, innuendo, and philosophizing in general.
August 27th, 2007 at 10:47 am
jfrater: Acts 15:28,29 says ‘abstain … from blood’. That includes animal blood. If you misunderstand that, then the transfusion topic is definitely beyond your grasp. The attacks on Russell are unsubstantiated and off topic. Adultery and murder are more serious sins than lying for profit. And yet God forgave King David after he repented. Russell, as a Bible publisher, was not in the profit business anyways. Judging people by their flaws, real or imagined, doesn’t follow the model of Christ.
August 27th, 2007 at 12:10 pm
Aaron: we obviously disagree so there is no point in debating to the death
If you are happy being a Jehovah’s witness that is good. But we must all remember that while these subjects do cause disagreement, we must be fair on others. I am not trying to convert you, so don’t try to convert me
I am sure you agree that the JW transfusion law is strange to non-JWs, therefore it does have a place on the list because the majority of people are not JWs.
August 27th, 2007 at 1:12 pm
jfrater: There is nothing ambiguous about Acts 15:28,29. Sounds like back-pedaling in light of YOUR unfair comments. So why did you bring up all that other unrelated stuff? I’ll agree it is strange, because anybody that actually believes the Bible is strange in popular opinion. Blood transfusions are old technology. Better options are available. Nothing weird about seeking the best health care you can get.
August 27th, 2007 at 9:09 pm
Aaron: I raised the issues of Charles Taze Russell because the doctrines against blood transfusion come from his interpretations and translations of the Greek Bible – and he lied about knowing Greek. If he lied about that, how do you know he didn’t lie about other aspects of the religion? I am not going to say anything further in this thread as I don’t think it is useful to either of us to keep on.
August 28th, 2007 at 9:11 am
jfrater: How do you know he lied about anything? Your accusations are still unsubstantiated. Russell died in 1916. Long before any understanding about blood transfusions was communicated to any Jehovah’s Witness. And the Bibles back then were crude compared to the better translations available now in modern English. And we don’t even reference any literature that he wrote. He was just a man in the stream of time who worshiped to the best of his knowledge. Any Bible will state the abstaining of blood in Acts 15: 28,29. Nobody alive today looks to him for religious direction. Seems like you are stuck in the past. Anyone can make a mistake or even self-deceive themselves. The question is: What will you do once you’ve been corrected?
August 29th, 2007 at 12:15 am
Aaron: I have presented my views and I am not going to do so again – if you really need to argue, read my previous comments and reply to those again – I am not adding any more fuel to this fire
August 29th, 2007 at 7:56 am
Charles Taze Russell wrote nothing about blood transfusions. What Russell wrote was: “To the Jew it was forbidden, and under his covenant it was made a symbol of life–to partake of it would imply responsibility for the life taken.” (Watch Tower, April 15, 1909, page 117 – Reprints page 4374) Regardless, the idea of forbidding blood transfusions did not come from Charles Taze Russell.
Scripturally, the eating of blood is forbidden because life, the soul, is represented by the blood, which life [soul] belongs to God. If a life is taken away, respect is shown to God for that life by not eating the blood. Normally, no life is taken away in the process of a blood transfusion. The scriptures do not forbid blood transfusions.
[url removed]
There is no such thing as a “Russell version of the Bible.” Russell never produced such a version. There is no such version.
[url removed]
The accusation that Russell lied in court is false, and twists what was actually said.
[urls removed]
Christian love,
Ronald
August 29th, 2007 at 8:13 am
Ronald: Thank you for your comments. You are correct about the Bible used by JWs – it was not created by Russell but by a group of five men (one of whom had formal education in biblical languages).
As I have said in previous comments, Christ abrogated the laws against the consumption of animal blood – which is why there is no Christian religion that refuses to eat blood. I know many consider the JWs to not be Christian so perhaps that is not relevant.
The URL you included about Russell not lying in court has been removed because it is really more of an attack on the author of a booklet against Russell.
The other URLs have been removed because this website is not an avenue for proselytisation as I have said before on some of the other topics.
Please let this be the end of the debate – if it is not I will be forced to close the comments on this page and I do not want to do that.
August 31st, 2007 at 4:18 am
Hmm, that Jewish chicken thing… I wonder if that’s where the phrase “choking the chicken” came from, considering that masturbation is a sin, and that they “choked” the chicken in order to transfer their sins to it?
August 31st, 2007 at 4:34 am
Wardrich: a curious observation
I actually don’t know the origins of that term so it is possible I guess.
September 8th, 2007 at 12:49 pm
An interesting topic on Islam to talk about, more interesting than the burqa wearing in my opinion, is the Shiite practice of self flagellation. Its quite impressive seeing hundreds of men walking down the street beating themselves in a sort of synchronized rhythmic dance.
September 9th, 2007 at 11:58 am
There are many seemingly strange religious practices…here are a few more I think should be added to the list.
-female circumcision aka female genital mutilation(common practice in Sudan and parts of Egypt, most commonly by Muslims, although it should be noted that well over 80% of the Muslim tradition do NOT practice this cruel ritual.
-the more common male circumcision
-serpent handling
-speaking in tongues
-the European Witchcraze
-sky burial (offering the dead to vultures)
- and many many more…
September 9th, 2007 at 12:22 pm
more than you’d ever know: Sky burial can be found here
September 9th, 2007 at 11:13 pm
Why male circumcision is weird? None doctors say it’s bad, but some doctors say it’s good for the body.
September 9th, 2007 at 11:30 pm
Özhan: It is quite a controversial practice. I think the main arguments against it are that it has religious roots, and that there is no need to remove a part of the body unless it is causing ill health – which, for the majority of uncircumcised men, is not the case. In a way it is like tonsils – in the old days many doctors would suggest that a child have his tonsils removed even if he wasn’t sick.
September 14th, 2007 at 8:24 am
what ever… i believe in jesus christ and he is my saviour.. thats it.. you guys just go ahead with what ever..
September 25th, 2007 at 9:59 am
Sonny: Um… okay, you do that. Not really the point of this list or the comment board. I don’t believe that anyone here was trying to convert you with pictures of e-meters and discussion of dowrys.
Hey, whatever happened to Orgone? That’s still considered a religion, and the orgonists have some questionable practices (including sitting naked in a box for hours on end trying to cure everything with the power of the orgasm.) I thought it was worth an honorable mention. The temple garments made me smile, though.
September 25th, 2007 at 10:04 am
wowzer: I have written so many lists already that I sometimes forget what I have mentioned, but something makes me think I mentioned Orgone on one of the lists. William Burroughs was a fan and owned one of the orgone collecting boxes that I believe he used right up to his death. At any rate, I was reading about it recently. Very weird.
September 30th, 2007 at 1:34 am
please double check your information about Jehovah’s Witnesses’ refusal of blood transfusions. the information listed is not only rife with inaccuracy but contains many misleading statements.
October 3rd, 2007 at 8:54 am
Dowry is not a Hindu Custom.
Please do research before.
October 15th, 2007 at 10:06 pm
what about tortures?
what about money request? !!!!!!
October 15th, 2007 at 10:49 pm
no no no: Torture is not a dogmatic aspect of any religion that I know of, and money request is hardly bizarre — it is also done by poor people and charities. The only one I can think of where the money aspect is bizarre is Scientology and they are already on this list
October 26th, 2007 at 3:02 am
There are disputes over this and that list number, but nobody complained about why Shamanism is on the list??
Most of the religions recognise existance of spirits in the world in form of angels/demons/aliens/nameit, but when there is a practice that tries to make some use of spirits, it is considered weird??
October 26th, 2007 at 3:34 am
Bjesomar: have you seen the Tibetan shaman in action? It is a very bizarre thing to witness; that is why it is on the list.
October 26th, 2007 at 4:55 am
Well, have you seen spiritist in action? Talking to the dead? Channeling? Possesion? Voddoo?All are basically the same thing. That’s what i had in mind.
October 26th, 2007 at 10:12 am
Please add the idiotic mutilation practice of circumcision.
October 26th, 2007 at 10:16 am
Jews: It is included on Top 10 bizarre religious procedures.
October 26th, 2007 at 10:30 am
When a moyel circumcizes a baby, he sucks the blood off the penis with his mouth. To came to light a few years ago when a moyel gave herpes to about 8 baby boys in NYC. Do a search on it.
October 26th, 2007 at 10:49 am
Jews against circumcision: I have deleted your advertising post – please read the list I posted in comment 87 – it mentions the herpes case. Don’t be lazy – if you want to debate the practice, do it on the right list and don’t just post a link to your website – we all want to be in on the debate
November 8th, 2007 at 4:59 am
All religious parctices are bizarre! We live in the 21st centery people there’s no need for any backward indocranating religions! religions were designed to explain why unexplained things happened in the world now there’s science. All religions really need to get over them selves!
November 8th, 2007 at 3:16 pm
yeah, stop mucking about. i really have no clue, other than tradition why seemingly sane people go to extreme lengths to make such asses of themselves. i have a healthy interest in theology, metaphysics etc. just not pathological. yet. think of your children people. overt displays of god fearing ways cannot but produce stereotypes and an altogether weakened race. pray in silence to whatever YOU may believe
November 29th, 2007 at 11:07 am
Dowry is not part of the religion.
Please do research before putting this crap together.
November 29th, 2007 at 11:11 am
The irony is palpable
November 29th, 2007 at 11:33 am
Jamie: HAHAHA!
From the post itself:
“This is a cultural practice rather than religious.”
They say ignorance is bliss!
November 29th, 2007 at 11:38 am
Weird is relative here. As a long time practicing Christian, I don’t look down on other religions. I live in Salt Lake but I’m not a Mormon. I’ve known many Sikhs, Muslims, Buddhists, Wiccans and so on. I don’t view their practices as weird, just different. Real Christians know our religion is an invitation, not a mandate. Freedom of religion is also a right here. Regardless whether they try to baptize the dead or go naked in the street, they have a right to believe as they choose.
November 29th, 2007 at 1:49 pm
How bout the muzzies doing their fast that is pretty fukin stupid
November 29th, 2007 at 4:06 pm
Baptism for the dead was practised by the early catholic church. Take a tour of the midevil cathedrals in Europe sometime and you’ll see that I’m right. Mormons weren’t the first. . .
November 29th, 2007 at 7:11 pm
Jainists don’t eat animals or plants.
November 30th, 2007 at 12:31 am
Aaron, given what Acts 15 28:29 says, and how devoted you seem to be to it’s strict interpretation, can I assume that you are a strict vegetarian?
November 30th, 2007 at 1:52 am
Probably the best, if not the only, benefits of organized religion is that it can deter criminal behavior in some people if they feel they will have to answer to a higher power. It also gives some people hope. Unfortunately there are those people who believe in killing in the name of god.
November 30th, 2007 at 3:15 am
As a muslim woman who wears the niqab, of course in my opinion it is not weird. In islam we firmly believe in modesty, from our behavior to our way of dress. I can understand that those who are not muslim believe a woman covering her face is weird since there are so many women who are naked while being dressed. I started to wear niqab this summer and i very much enjoy it. I believe that it is important for a muslim woman to cover herself as so, because of the lack of modesty and the prevalence of indecency today. I am not a victim to the fashion industry, nor a victim to what society believes is beauty. When i wear my niwab, i am identified as a muslim woman. i am not oppressed, im happily married, a college student has great friends and a mind of my own. As any woman i want to be known for my character and intellect, not my exterior.
Also to those who believe religion is stupid…People will believe whatever they believe. Ive knows many wiccans, christians, muslim, jews, and so on who firmly believe in thier way of life. If you dont understand the concept of something greater then yourself, then thats your business. But to say that religion (way of life) is stupid because we live in the 21st century now thats stupid. But then again your going to believe in what your going to believe, because thats your business and not mine.
November 30th, 2007 at 3:45 am
muslimah: thanks for your comment – it is interesting to hear from someone that wears the niqab
November 30th, 2007 at 3:45 am
This article was poorly written.
November 30th, 2007 at 3:50 am
Cezary: what would you have done differently?
November 30th, 2007 at 8:13 pm
the worst thing God ever did was to tell the world that he exists
December 1st, 2007 at 3:46 am
Your welcome. I have a question, why are some people atheist? Most atheist i know are depressed.
December 1st, 2007 at 4:46 am
muslimah: the Pope released a document yesterday that said that Athiests have no hope – and so I guess that would be the reason according to him anyway
December 1st, 2007 at 5:26 am
@muslimah: I’m an atheist and I’m not depressed.
Why I’m an atheist? Well basically I don’t believe in any kind of ‘greater’ existence or any purpose to our existence. My believe is once were dead, we’re finished, it’s done, fini, no afterlife or what-so-ever.
Religion in my eyes is just a way to handle this unescapable moment and make it bearable to live with. I personally have no problem with this projected end of my life, so I really have no need for a religion. What’s done is done
December 1st, 2007 at 9:39 am
What I find ammusing about all religious discussions and sects is that each interprets the Bible or other Holy Books to say what they want it to say. The Bible for instance has been translated hundreds of times and yet each translation is different. Why? Because we only have the knowledge of what we are told the words mean.
Language is a living breathing thing and it changes day to day. Words are added and forgoten, meanings change.
To think that it is possible for modern man could acurately interprete even the early english translations of the Bible is crazy. The reality is that all religion is a matter of opinion and subject to change according to the wishes of it’s believers. How many laws in early religion (any religion) have been changed to suit modern believers.
Basically all I’m saying is that we really don’t know what the original Bible or any or the other various religious books actually say. All we have now are flawed human translations of what we think they say.
Also for a reality check, religions in general were simple ways to keep order in a time when laws and law enforcement were non existant. What better way to keep people from murdering one another than to make them fear some unseen all knowing being that will punish them in the after life. After all, once some one dies who can prove they were or weren’t punished? Fear is a powerful motivator, create enough of it and you can make people do anything you want.
December 1st, 2007 at 9:59 am
Tuar: I agree.
December 1st, 2007 at 10:35 am
Oh, and to clarify, I am not bashing any religion nor am I condoning any particular belief. I simply wish that people would open their minds to the possibilty that maybe just maybe, there is more than just one answer.
More deaths, wars and other atrocities have been caused thru out history because of religion than by anything else. It simply usually breaks down to the fact that we get so rapped up in our own individual religion we just can’t accept the fact that it’s possible we aren’t the only ones who are right.
Religion, like anything else in life is a numbers game. The more people you convince to believe what you believe the more powerful you become. History, and religion goes to those who are still strong enough to be standing when the dust settles.
December 1st, 2007 at 12:18 pm
dude u should really look up what Kaporot is before you publish it as weird….it actually has a meaning behind unlike drinking jesus’s blood (thank you chris) LOOK UP THE FACTS
December 1st, 2007 at 12:50 pm
Michelle: Communion has a reason, its just strange to people who don’t follow that faith. Just as Kaporot has a reason, but that doesn’t make it any less strange to people who don’t observe it.
December 1st, 2007 at 2:15 pm
Ok… first and foremost…
DOWRY was listed as NOT BEING A RELIGIOUS practice on the list. So all of you that just like to look at the bold words and the pretty pictures… you’re stupid.
And second, why does anyone care WHAT any of these “religious” practices are for? Religion is a farce and not worthy of serious concern.
December 1st, 2007 at 2:41 pm
Michelle: And the meaning behind it is…?
December 1st, 2007 at 10:27 pm
Thats what I also wanted to quote. That most atheists believe that once we’re dead thats it. Could you perhaps clarify to me why you believe this is?
December 2nd, 2007 at 6:46 am
In answer to the lady who posted about the niqab I agree that people should not label what they do not understand as weird. Understanding before condemnation is a good idea.
I do think that people who wear things for a religious purpose or do things for a religious reason should understand why they do it though and not just go through the motions.
I observed last summer an Islamic teenage young woman wearing the headscarf to cover her hair but wearing the tightest pair of jeans which left nothing to the imagination at all…she certainly wasn’t being very modest; but she did have her head covered!
December 2nd, 2007 at 7:53 am
Ricardo: That’s similar to the Orthodox Jewish women who spend a thousand dollars or more on wigs in order to cover their natural hair.
I think the long version of the title to this list should be “Religious Practices that Are Perfectly Normal to the Followers of the Faith but Appear Weird to everyone Outside the Religion”
December 2nd, 2007 at 10:29 am
In the Indian Subcontinent there are tens of millions that believe in the transmigration of the human soul via chicken eggs. They believe that we have 32 souls not just one. Many villages have chickens but the local restaurant will not have eggs on the menu. You thought that “My Mother the Car” had no connection to a real rligion, didn’t you.
December 2nd, 2007 at 10:32 am
Max: seriously? Do you have a name for that?
December 2nd, 2007 at 1:49 pm
Why is it that the civilizations that do the least to ward off evil spirits have the least trouble with evil spirits?
December 2nd, 2007 at 2:01 pm
And if your religion has to conceal any of its doctrines/practices from the general public, what are they unconsciously admitting about it?
December 2nd, 2007 at 6:06 pm
Muslimah: I am a Muslim convert (revert to us believers), however, I was once an atheist. The reason atheist’s believe that your consciousness is lost after death is simply because, scientifically, that’s it. In scientific terms, our consciousness is only our brain’s perception of our senses, and nothing more. As our brain stops functioning when we die, it is the scientific viewpoint that our consciousness also ceases.
Also, I’d like to ask, do you consider the Niqab a religious practice, or one of your own free will? As, religiously, we only need to observe hijab, not anything more…at least, as far as I am aware.
December 3rd, 2007 at 3:13 pm
I came late to this party, and 120+ comments is too much to read through entirely, so forgive me if I am simply repeating something. But these last few comments — those about atheism — have drawn me in.
I am an atheist. But I do not ‘believe’ once you are dead, you simply cease to be (referring back to ThePenguinator, comment 108)
That is not to say I ‘believe’ there is something more after death.
I simply do not believe.
My position is thus: God may or may not exist; and there are an infinite number of possible iterations in which he exists, and an infinite number in which he does not; and from our lowly vantage point it is thoroughly impossible to prove any iteration to either effect; and as such, the existence or nonexistence of god is irrelevant.
That is, either God exists and the world is as it is, or God does not exist and the world is as it is; and either way, we can only take the world as it is.
So perhaps there is life after death, and perhaps there isn’t. but I, personally, will always remain more concerned with life before death.
And, for the record, I am not depressed.
-MSG
December 4th, 2007 at 5:55 am
M.S. Goda, you qualify as an agnostic.
December 4th, 2007 at 6:33 am
Well, I am currently developing a new religion. The dress code of my religion is nothing. Not only should you be naked in church but also at home, at work, on the bus, in the supermarket, everywhere! Wearing clothes is a SIN. REPENT! REPENT! Join my church!
(I don’t expect it to go over too well in cold climates)
December 4th, 2007 at 6:50 am
Hahaha Drogo, that was really funny.
December 4th, 2007 at 11:23 pm
Asalaamu alakum warahmatullahi wabarakatu Yoshi. I believe that islam should be followed as the way Prophet Muhammad and his companions did it. Since they were there at the time of revelation. the sahabiyyat (the women at the time of muhammad) wore the niqab. Muhammad did not stop them from it. when you pray more it does not hurt you it benefits you, when a woman covers more it does not hurt her it benefits her. Niqab is referenced in authentic hadiths, in the Quran, and I also look for the Ulema for advice regarding it. Ive been wanting to wear it since i was 17, but i didnt don it until this summer at the age of 22. if you look on some other great islamic websites you can find some info about the niqab.
December 8th, 2007 at 11:24 pm
Muslimah: why is it Haram (not “kosher”) to wear niqab to Hajj. Women who wear Niqab, are required to remove the niqab, and show their face while perfoming the Hajj. Also Islam is a religion of moderation, that encourages compromise. Also, there is the princible of preventing innovation, or in arabic “Bid’ah”) in response to your statement that more covering of body is better. Also, I do believe that it was only the prophets wives who covered their faces, and it was due to their special status. I would appreciate your response. Thanx
December 9th, 2007 at 3:15 pm
M.S. Goda (comment #24): Hulagu is correct, your belief system classifies under Agnosticism.
I am also Agnostic and I simply acknowledge the fact that I do not know and I will not know. I am aware that I cannot support nor deny the existence of a greater power.
Believing in a higher power certainly brings comfort to those who practice religion. They think they have the answer, whatever that may be. To question that answer rocks the foundation of their lives, which is forbidden as it causes mass chaos. I attribute the appeal of religion and the defense of religion to that fact in addition to the “numbers game” theory. The more who believe in “A”, the more that believing in “A” will be accepted.
I was actually raised Catholic and I also find the eating of bread and drinking of wine as Jesus’s body and blood is (for lack of a better term) “odd”.
Great chat and great posting!
December 14th, 2007 at 9:08 pm
What about the practice of honor killings?
December 15th, 2007 at 5:31 am
They are not religious based…
December 17th, 2007 at 5:28 pm
i have found some websites that can do better explaining than i can…
http://www.geocities.com/islam4allp/hajjniqab.html
http://www.muhajabah.com/niqab-index.htm
http://muttaqun.com/niqab.html
http://www.jannah.org/articles/bidah.html
December 28th, 2007 at 2:23 pm
Tuar and Jfrater make the best points in here!
December 29th, 2007 at 8:31 pm
Now I can get down with that Jainist Digambaras. I like the philosophy of it. Im in!
December 30th, 2007 at 3:09 am
Yikkity: don’t forget to donate your clothes to the St Vincent De Paul society
January 6th, 2008 at 4:30 pm
Actualy the NIQAB from what i know is not mostly said to be required by the majority of the sheiks (the scholars)
Its actualy a Choice , what is obligated is the HIJAB wich is the covering of the hair, and the HIJAB is not only done by muslims but evin christians , nuns wear them. and a painintg of mariam peace be apon her was painted with her having the hijab.
so the VAIL is obligated but the covering of the face from what i know is not.
January 7th, 2008 at 4:46 pm
honor killings…i dont know, from what i can remember its practiced in india and pakistan, i dont know their reasons for it.
January 9th, 2008 at 10:27 am
What about the strange practice of hyping up an audience to “give to the Lord”-when it is clearly going in their pockets–not “the Lord’s”?
The e-meter looks like a goofy kids toy, the lingere is unappealing—maybe if the Pope would insist Catholics wear it there would be alot less ‘baby Catholics’ running around…just a thought…
The dowry seems like a good way to rip off a family that has worked harder and produced more than your family did….
The Jewish Kaporot..is just funny..swirling animals around your head then giving it to the poor?? SO they can symbolically eat your screw-ups??–W-r-o-n-g!!
January 9th, 2008 at 11:31 am
the only thing my shaman could provide as a dowry was some temple garments, so I had him exorcised, which required a blood transfusion that he refused. He died, so I baptized him.
January 11th, 2008 at 11:07 am
to the second comment: circumsision is an act imposed by judaism and islam not for absolutely no reason but for hygienic reasons. Circumcised persons are 25% less apt of getting STD’s. Personally I would not want to have my cum stay stuck between my four skin and my head. And for the dumbass who criticized ramadan, it is not a wierd practice since normally christianity imposes it as well, however no christian really follows that. Ramadan is not just a process of not eating during the day, but of charity, and donation. At the end of Ramadan you are supossed to donate 2% of your income…in a way it is sort of taxation to help the poor. This act is called zakat.Niqab nor hijab are required by the koraan, it was a mere misinterpretation.
January 11th, 2008 at 11:36 am
circumcision*
January 11th, 2008 at 11:46 am
John waters…comment 11. exorcism is practiced in a lot of religions…and in islam it is more superstition than religion…more cultural than religious…the koraan actualy prohibits exorcism. AND jinn and shaitan are two different things…jounoun is plural…shaitain means devil…SATAN=SHAITAN. so please if you’re gonna fucking say something…say something that is TRUE.
January 11th, 2008 at 2:09 pm
oh and for that dumbass up there…comment 86 and 88..”JEWS AGAINST CIRCUMCISION.” Maybe JEWS suck blood out of the babies penis. but we muslims are a lil more advanced and get it done at a doctors with amnesia as its supposed to be done in the modern world. It is illegal in most muslim countries to circumcize someone without a doctorate. and it is definitely not a mutilation.
January 11th, 2008 at 4:04 pm
and to comment 92…you idiot! learn how to spell before even writing a comment. AND he did say that it was more of a cultural than a religious practice…so learn how to READ before u comment.
January 18th, 2008 at 12:01 am
My two bits to this dicussion is this: From the Western viewpoint — and the author of this page is one –the list is not surprising, particularly the inclusion of the niqab and dowry (which is not a religious practice at all). While non-Westerners have the ability to absorb other world views, this is not the case with most people from the West. So while I request the author to do some more research and try and understand other world views, the readers need not really get worked up somebody’s ignorance.
January 20th, 2008 at 8:01 am
Religion is the dumbest idea that mankind has ever had it is all nonsense and is mostly destructive and bad for the whole world. Join the “Brights”
January 28th, 2008 at 8:24 am
nadir cant spell yet he/she points out the spelling mistakes of others. that is “TRUE”
nadir…you should lighten up abit geeezz
=D
“Circumcised persons are 25% less apt of getting STD’s” lol how did they come up with that statistic?
+ its a stupid statistic to release if you want to prevent the spread of any sort of std
January 28th, 2008 at 9:12 am
From the western viewpoint — sudhas sweeping statement that non-Westerners have the greatest ability to absorb other world views, is not surprising. it is not surprising based on the fact that i say it is not. mmmmmmmm
this list is really ignorant i mean… his/her OPINIONS differ from mine.. so he must be ignorant! damn westerner with his ignorance.
hmm I wonder what my ‘non-western’ version of the list would look like? perhaps it would include the consumption of wine as jesus juice… oh wait i forgot, one wouldnt exist coz i as a non-westerners am so understanding of ‘other world views’ that no religious/cultural/anything pratices would be weird to me.
January 29th, 2008 at 3:25 am
bridal money is given to the woman in islam, so yes it is a religous practice
January 29th, 2008 at 3:39 am
Circumcision: It is the removal of the skin which covers the glans (tip of the male organ) so that it is apparent. This is to take place at a young age as this time has a faster recovery and so the young boy is raised upon the best condition. From the wisdom of circumcision is cleanliness of the male organ from filth which is caught in the foreskin and there many other benefits.
January 29th, 2008 at 3:42 am
with the foreskin, pew, things get harbored in there. i dont know if any of the statistics of uncircumsized/stds are true, but whenever we go to the clinic or a doctor we are told that our health will be surveyed (fyi).
January 29th, 2008 at 4:21 am
If a guy gets a disease because of germs in his foreskin then he needs a lesson on how to bathe properly. As far as I know I’ve never seen a circumsized you-know-what (in the gym locker room), but then I haven’t been looking. I only know one jewish guy, but I’m not about to ask, “Hey Sam, what’s it like being cut (circumsized)?”
January 29th, 2008 at 12:06 pm
Stop hurting people’s religious faith, else we will stop arguing and start the holy Jihad. I think no one wants that.
Every religion has it’s own *beep*ing superstitious beliefs. So stop listing some and *beep*ing around thinking your religion is better.
Jobless *beep*ers.
January 29th, 2008 at 7:47 pm
Further comments on Charles Tase Russell. It is very well documented in periodicals that he predicted the “second coming of Christ” five different times. The first, many of his congregation gave away their possessions and joined Russell on top of a mountain. When the predicted “Second Coming” didn’t happen, some committed suicide. The first rule of prophets is they can’t be wrong. Russell was wrong many times. Nothing against JW”S believe what you want, but know the facts.
January 30th, 2008 at 9:07 am
Just goes to show, people will do anything their religion tells them to.
January 30th, 2008 at 11:01 pm
I’m surprised the Scientological practice of “silent births” isn’t included. (sorry if this has already been mentioned). Women are not allowed to make ANY noise whatsoever while delivering. The idea is that the child being born may have a negative primary experience of life, because of the sounds of pain. It somehow would taint their psyche. They believe in providing a “positive beginning” thus including the first sounds. And of course, they don’t believe in the use of drugs, so these women are doing it all natural-what a bunch of sadists. L. Ron. Hubard was a total chauvanist! This was a practice that he enstated.
January 31st, 2008 at 4:39 pm
WOW, is this man still alive? i never gave birth before, but from the women ive asked THEY CANT EVEN DESCRIBE LABOR! Im all for a positive beginning, like a soothing herbal bath afterwards or infant massage, but ’silent births’….wow
February 2nd, 2008 at 11:52 am
More amusing are all the apologists for these bizarre practices and religions! The more you prtest, the sillier you seem!
I love these lists, and am thinking about making a podcast based on one or two.
February 2nd, 2008 at 3:28 pm
If you’re going to point out the strange practices of LDS, Inc. you should at least include Polygamy as practiced by the Fundamentalist Church of J.C. etc, etc…. Of course, we know who really started that one, don’t we, Mr. Joe Smith?
February 3rd, 2008 at 3:51 pm
i would like to respond to the BLOOD AND FLESH.
when messiah said to the pharises these famous words,(remember the forbid on eating blood…)which i paraphrase:
he that drinks my blood and eat my flesh…
i have to point out that it is a riddle,and the christian is also hard put with it.
the signification is:
when man was banished and cursed:
to the sweat of your brow shall you eat your bread……
till u return to the ground(death)
see genesis…
so then in view of the curse…
man toils endlessly the soil to eke out a subsistance from his efforts and dies.
bread is symbolic of food and is a consumable to make the body live.
blood is life.
the idea is that since he is the word then the idea of consuming it means digesting it,hence the entire meaning is analog to the physical process,and he offered himself as the subsistance for man like bread that one has not toiled for …or earned
meaning A REVERSAL OF THE ORIGINAL CURSE..
i think most of us are aware as beleivers that messiah spoke in symbols
and idioms to confound the so called learned of his day,hey they planned his murder…
anyway as to the authenticity of the script,the most probable parts left untouched are usually cryptic and allusive and such is the blood and the bread.
recap:so what was toiled for under the curse wore the man to death,and what is offered ( not laboured for) leads to life…it’s that simple!!!
p.s love this site.
February 4th, 2008 at 3:08 am
Why is it so popular to make fun of a disrespect people and their beliefs on the internet? I’m glad none of us has nothing better to do than criticize others. I am starting to realize that this list was once an amusing way to wate time has now just become a sad realization that people are completely unsatisfied with their lives or the lack there of that they need to make other people look bad in order to feel better about themselves.
I’m not going to defend or argue any of this crap. If things are considered “sacred” leave them at that. It is a blatant lack of respect and shows a true lack of character to openly criticize them. Some of you should be ashamed of yourselves. I’m out.
February 10th, 2008 at 3:08 pm
I am just surprised the whole list wasn’t used to make fun of Mormons. Seems like that is the only religion it’s okay to bash.
February 11th, 2008 at 4:37 pm
all religious people appear to be very, very odd. They just follow tradition and ceremony blindly. Odd.
February 13th, 2008 at 3:43 pm
I had heard that muslimas are prostituts beacourse she got money from man’ when she have sex with him
young girls with wery old men’some I read abaut has 54 wifes he pay for them all
February 13th, 2008 at 6:16 pm
So you’re calling me a prostitute on your idiotic reasoning? Wow. I dont know where you heard this bigotry from, but in islam we believe in dowrys. This gift is given to the wife at any point during the marriage. The wife tells her husband what kind of gift she wants and he gives it to her. I dont know about you but i like that. I dont know what gender you are, but if your a woman wouldnt you want bridal gifts?
this dowry must be reasonable but ive heard of some women wanting cars and houses. My dowry was simple.
The age difference in couples- In some places this is a cultural thing. Sadly in those countries the dowry is so high men in their 20’s arent able to get married. Which doesnt make sense to me since islamically the dowry HAS to be simple and not put a burden upon the husband. But in this day and age money talks and walks.
oh yeah, the dowry is most of the time given BEFORE they consummate(you do know what that means right lol) Please get your facts right and think before you speak.
I dont know who has 54 wives. But in islam only 4 are allowed if a man can EQUALLY and i mean EQUALLY take care of them. If he buys one wife a pair of shoes the other wife gets a pair. if you have questions dont hesitiate, but conceal your narrow-mindedness.
February 16th, 2008 at 2:00 am
circumsicion is not a religion staff neither a must. westernes thinks cut a penis is bad. search some higen and compare how many transvestites in ur land cuts off their penis with the ones who has circumsised
February 16th, 2008 at 2:11 am
aydin – thanks for clearing that one up
February 16th, 2008 at 2:18 am
muslimah – a dowry is paid by the bride’s family, not the groom. I think you are referring to a “dower”, which is the other way around.
February 18th, 2008 at 10:56 pm
Kiwiboi, please believe me it is the man that GIVES the dowry to the bride in islam.
You are refering to the indian/hindu custom of marriage, when the womans family gives the husband a dowry.
The Mahr (Dowry): Allah says (what means): “And give to the women their dowry with a good heart, but if they out of their own good pleasure remit any part of it to you, take it and enjoy it without fear of any harm.” (Al-Nisa 4:4) The mahr can be of any amount, Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi was sallam) said, “Look for one even if it was an iron ring.” (Bukhari and Muslim)
The woman is not obliged to give the man anything at the time of the wedding, as is done in some cultures.
February 29th, 2008 at 5:52 pm
how abour boobism, “requires the manhandling of boobs”!!!(watches the goddy ppl look in discust and write their novels about the pics you lot should sit and listen instead of writing your richus shit.
February 29th, 2008 at 6:19 pm
i r athiustz!
March 5th, 2008 at 8:54 pm
Hey guys,
Although there may be countless religions and practices out there one as bothered me quite a bit.
And that is of Islam
I’ve always wanted to know why the Muslim King (Urengenzab) tourtured many Sikhs and Hindus and wanted them to become Muslim? This completely goes against humane practices and distorts the perception on God. Knowing that this occured many years ago has really bothered me just knowing innocent people were killed. Then you get sept 9/11 decades later only to find the same thing happening?! I don’t see all muslims as bad people for there are bad people in every religion, all am saying is why is there an emphasis placed on killing others because they are not muslim-what wrong have they done!?
March 17th, 2008 at 2:26 pm
buck shepherd – could you give references/ sources/ websites about Charles having five different predictions for the “End of Days”?
April 7th, 2008 at 11:11 pm
How about the Westboro Church – God Hates Fags and they’re website and picketing of soldiers. Cruel bastards.
Someone mention rattlesnake handling by people from Applacia I believe.
April 8th, 2008 at 12:50 pm
God made man, Man made religion. Who do you trust?
April 11th, 2008 at 2:56 am
Why are people so defensive about Hindus? I agree acknowledge whats fucked up (just like in other religions.
- Dowry (definitely came up due to the 80%+ Hindus in India though others may practice as well)
- Suttee (it is completely absurd)
- Manu’s laws (puts women at the same level as the muslims do which is derogatory to women to say the least)
- Caste systems (untouchables !! … hah. and the twice born brahmins who consider themselves better than the rest. stone age buddy stone age)
- how about Astrology (ever seen a hindu who doesn’t belive in this crap. auspicious times, manglik, rah ketu, shani, planets and plam reading, all shitty stuff that even highly educated Hindus in india subscribe to and even top politicians in india subscribe to)
do i need to add more to the list. go do your own research first if you are defending Hindus as the exception who lack any stupid practices.
April 21st, 2008 at 1:18 pm
I don’t think dowry is a religious practice. Just because most of them are hindu doens’t mean anything. Many muslims(especially in Arab countries,if you read religious stories) give dowries.
April 21st, 2008 at 1:21 pm
Vikas: That’s simply your opinion. You can’t criticize other religions, you don’t even know if your own one is right, and if you’re an aethist, then you don’t know if religion is true. You knows, maybe god does want us to sacrifice thousands of people on top of pyramids like the Aztecs.
April 21st, 2008 at 1:23 pm
Oh wait, ignore comment 178
April 21st, 2008 at 1:23 pm
Oh wait, ignore comment 178. The last part
April 26th, 2008 at 4:47 pm
i agree on Ghidoran first part of the comment. in my opinion and knowledge dowry is a culture thing thats been continued over years although i dont think its practiced in many parts of muslim or hindu countries any longer. you could search into other weird rituals e.g shia rituals
April 27th, 2008 at 8:23 pm
Dowry is part of islam, the man gives a dowry to the woman.
April 28th, 2008 at 3:29 pm
i didnt kno
how cums
wot 4
usualy in islam da women gives everything as usual male being da dominant one kno 4rm experience of a close mate!!!
April 29th, 2008 at 6:54 pm
i agree that of those 2 muslims and mormons are the worst religions with the weirdest praciteces and were founded by liars promoting their own sick vendettas.
No good has come from islam or mormonism, and none will
But you brainwashed will defend yourself, but have a long nice afterlife in the lake of fire you pieces of shit
April 30th, 2008 at 4:52 pm
Christian’s communion of eating bread & drinkin wine in remembrance of Christ’s last supper is only a symbol. it’s not like it’s literally eating the body & drinkig the blood. some people believe that when u eat & drink it transforms into the blood & body but no. its only a representation. only a symbol of What Christ gave for us. he gave up his body in death & his blood was shed for our sins so that we can be seen as pure if we believe. even at the last supper with Christ passing the bread & wine to his disciples it was only a symbol. it was a symbol/representatn of what was about to happen. it’s not anything weird. it just has meaning in the Christian faith. just like any other practice has meaning in any other religion.
April 30th, 2008 at 9:46 pm
Boy. I wish I had a dollar for every dumbass I ran into either on the streets or on the internet. I would be a filthy rich man.
May 7th, 2008 at 2:35 pm
I think people believe in (a) higher, supernatural being(s) because it feels nice to think of somebody watching over them, sort of like a parent. We all need somebody to lean on.
What if no gods actually exist and we’re just here because of the Big Bang and Darwin’s theory of Evolution and all that. Maybe all this religon is something we made up?
But who knows, maybe we’re all right. Maybe God and Buddha (he /is/ considered a god, depending on which sect you’re in and what you believe) and every other god all work together. Maybe if you’re a Christian, God looks after you and if you’re Buddhist, Buddha looks after you (etc, etc).
Who knows.
June 5th, 2008 at 9:16 am
This usually isn’t considered weird, but my experience being confirmed I consider odd. They smeared vile smelling glop on my forehead (I hear it had went rancid, and it should have smelt good), then I get slapped by the bishop.
June 5th, 2008 at 8:50 pm
Us muslim women give everything to the men? where do you get this from?
A muslim woman has the option to work. The husband ‘gives’ everything to the wife. He works, thus taking care of home financially. The muslim husband ‘gives’ the wife her dowry after they are married during the ceremony or it can be deferred during the marriage. the dowry is a gift. everyone loves gifts, especially us women. =^)
June 13th, 2008 at 4:41 am
@jrafter
How mouch tijme do spend in Wikipedia every day..jus curious..
June 13th, 2008 at 4:53 am
uvberot: I usually only go there briefly when looking stuff up for a list or if I am having a debate in real life over something. I never go there unless I am looking for something specific – and once I find it – I read it and leave again.
June 13th, 2008 at 11:46 am
@ jfrater
“…and once I find it – I read it and leave again.”
Whoa, how do you do that? lol. I always say that, then 4 hours and information overload later, I leave. lol
June 14th, 2008 at 7:46 am
jratfer: ya i guess thats the perfect way to use Wikipedia.. but aren’t you worried about the accuracy and the authenticity of the stuff you find there??
July 16th, 2008 at 6:06 am
Muslimah: Just wanted to say, thanks…I’ve always wanted to hear from someone who followed Islam and hear what wearing the Niqab meant to them, and you made some great points and helped me understand.
Jamie: You’re a clear, concise and thoughtful writer, and your intelligence easily shines through…so just wanted to say that because someone else said something to the contrary…
about atheism; i don’t follow any religion, or pray to any god. If we just died when we died, whats wrong with that? if we didnt, and were perhaps reincarnated or got to live another human life…then excellent. But either option, to me, beats the concept of heaven and hell…
I believe in energy and karma and the universe and in love – the latter being the one unchanged common denominator in religious teachings.
thats my 2 cents
Also, i’m not depressed either…in fact i’m quite a happy chappy
August 19th, 2008 at 2:40 pm
i am more spiritual than religious..(find out the difference)thus I believe there is only one God,the creator/Saviour of mankind,..God loves his people and as much as possible he doesn’t want them to be hurt.
Pain is caused by people’s own actions..
August 19th, 2008 at 2:46 pm
and what if God really exists and is standing in front of you and say “My Child, have Faith.” would you believe. Faith- believing without seeing. what’s the use of that word if you don’t have that.
August 31st, 2008 at 9:15 pm
i’m surprised nothing wiccan wasn’t on the list, that entire religion is wierd, tarot cards, a billion candles, always murky toned like we were in the dark ages again, and i’m sorry if I offend any Wiccans but come on, Green magic, black magic, white magic, blue magic, red magic? you guys got a grapity grape magic or a watermelon flavored magic up your sleeves too by any chance? oh well I can’t diss you guys too much, the world is confusing and people approach things the way they feel right. I personally think i’m right and think that it is really worth your time to check out my religion, I’m a Seventh Day Adventist. Just go to a SDA church and ask the pastor/priest/reverend to spill the beans so to speak. I guarentee it’ll be much different from what you think it will be like.
And Colin if you happen to come back to this and read it this is for you. Chances are the reason you haven’t ever chosed a religion is because all of the relgions offered to you haven’t been taught right to you. For instance Hell isn’t a place you burn in forever, that would totally debunk the bible. God is a merciful and loving God, how could a loving being torture people forever. Jesus said hell os “burning and gnashing of teeth” he never said eternally. God loves us but at the end of days we make a choice, God cannot take the sinners in because it would not be right and good to do so, but he doesn’t want them to suffer. So he does the best thing possible for them, destroy their bodies and souls. that would be a hellish thing to have no soul. Reguardless of whether you would choose christianity as your religion after being taught the right way isn’t my point though, the point is people are atheist because they haven’t gotten the full story on the religions they have experianced. And as with christianity, God is merciful and he winks at ignorance. Maybe your for lack of a better word “ignorant” enough to be in God’s grace. Or perhaps at the end of days you will take the right path, afterall it seemed that although you do not worship any god, you don’t rule any out either.
September 1st, 2008 at 1:54 am
your welcome Colin, im glad i lifted some ‘veils’ from your mind about islam and the niqab.
ask questions people! dont just settle for what msnbc or cnn tells you what islam is from a non-muslim who only gathers their info from some bad apples.
If you were sick wouldnt you ask for the specialist than the receptionist?
Open your mouth and your mind, theres knowledge all around you! lets break the chains of ignorance.
September 14th, 2008 at 11:14 am
For *anyone* to call *any* religious practice ‘weird’ displays utter willful ignorance and intolerance. It is shameful behavior at best.
Of course, I say that in irony, because as far as I’m concerned *all* religious practices are ‘weird.’
September 29th, 2008 at 7:39 pm
fucking weird
October 12th, 2008 at 10:01 am
I believe all adherents of different religions perceive and interpret their religion differently. As a muslimah i have been told by the Koran and Hadith to cover my al awra. According to alot of Islamic scholars a woman that requires a niqab is one who is EXTREMELY BEAUTIFUL, so beautiful that she attracts the stares of both males and females, the very young and the very old (as well as anyone in between). Women who are plain but use make-up to enhance their beauty are also required to wear the niqab. Take note that muslimats are expected to dress decently, avoid tight garments or clothings.
October 16th, 2008 at 12:15 am
Since I live in India.
1. Sati – where a living woman is burnt on the pyre of her dead husband.
2. Lingam – Praying to Lingam ( Penis of Shiva)
3. Praying to Kali – God kali killing God shiva and copulating with his dead corpse.
4. Dowry – where a brides parents need to pay a hefty amount to groom. Not so frequent with muslims of india and christians.
5. 3 Crore god and goddesses
6. caste system – there is a big divide in hindu struture. No intermarriages between Castes. There are people of lesser virtue who are supposed to be untouchables. A high caste hindu is not supposed to go to his house. He is not supposed to touch any higher caste hindu and even the utensils are not supposed to be shared with higher caste hindus.
7. Superiority of Brahmins – Brahmins are very superior to other castes. All hindu gods are brahmins. Only Brahmins can become priests of hindu temples. A brahmin woman cannot be desired, but a brahmin can desire other women and make her chaste. If a brahmin doesnt get dakshina from a hindu, the brahmin has every right to kill that person.
November 3rd, 2008 at 7:25 am
According to Merriam-Webster http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/weird%5B2%5D
Weird:
1 adj. Of, relating to, or caused by witchcraft or the supernatural.
Um, isn’t religion concerned with the supernatural, so isn’t it rather ignorant (if not ironic) to call any religion weird?
It’s all superstition when it comes down to it. Wake up folks, please.
November 3rd, 2008 at 7:32 am
As a follow up I’d like to clarify –
Superstition:
1 a: a belief or practice resulting from ignorance, fear of the unknown, trust in magic or chance, or a false conception of causation b: an irrational abject attitude of mind toward the supernatural, nature, or God resulting from superstition2: a notion maintained despite evidence to the contrary
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/superstition
I find it curious that “religion” doesn’t have the same definition.
Religion:
1 a: the state of a religious b (1): the service and worship of God or the supernatural (2): commitment or devotion to religious faith or observance2: a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices3archaic : scrupulous conformity : conscientiousness4: a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/religion
November 3rd, 2008 at 10:04 pm
Mami—I completely agree.
December 6th, 2008 at 8:39 am
@ 203 (James):
Ah! you live in India? Which century? Maybe the 5th century AD or even BC perhaps???
Sati is long gone! Some wackos MIGHT have followed it but it is outlawed…..
What superiority of Brahmins? They have been pushed to the background…The caste system does exist but your comments are fit only for the dark ages! Intermarriage among castes is common.
As for the other comments, probably people could find out a lot more by googling or using tools like the wikipedia. It’s too bad that the comments are not moderated or filtered for crap!
December 10th, 2008 at 6:50 am
All religion is human belief made into spiritual and cultural dogma. Thats where we loose freewill.
Spirituality, however, is a unique, individual path.
The above examples show how different we all are on this planet. It really is each to their own and before anyone condemns a practice because it is unfamiliar to them, a closer understanding of how that practice came about, may bring more respect.
Humans have, since time began, understood that there is WAY more to this obvious, material world that meets the eye. Now that science is starting to confirm the esoteric (ie shamanic healing which mirrors both modern psychology practice and how energy/light/mass works on a quantum level) we may finally start to see how these seemingly ‘weird’ practices have their roots in something more tangible.
Calling anything weird, by its very nature, indicates a lack of understanding. Instead, why not just say ‘unusual’ or ’surprising’?
December 11th, 2008 at 3:06 am
Do us all a favour if your dont want us to see your flesh, and cover your eyes aswell with the niqab, or better yet just stay indoors.
December 14th, 2008 at 2:56 pm
To: jerusalemexporthouse
On:Scientology machine.
It does nothing, scientology is stupid.
December 18th, 2008 at 10:10 am
This is to “You are a dumbass”. The person who wrote this article already specified that dowry is a cultural one in India. Furthermore, there is dowry (opposite gender) in Islam which is very much religious-based. And anyways, religious and culture often intersect and overlap.
December 18th, 2008 at 12:03 pm
Good point about the suicide bombing. I think it isn’t up here because it isn’t considered really part of Islam, according to many Muslims but for those that practice it, it definitely is.
December 18th, 2008 at 12:06 pm
There are plenty of Taoist practices. It isn’t surprising that you only know about the philosophy behind it because lots of people do believe in the “theory” but not in the “practice” of things. Taoist encompasses alot of different views and practices. For the person who was curious before, the i-ching is a major book (and practice) for Taoists.
December 18th, 2008 at 12:13 pm
Stop calling Muslims “muzzies” – that is so inappropriate. Fasting has been a part of religion for thousands of years. Sheesh. Didn’t you know that?
December 18th, 2008 at 12:18 pm
The silent birth thing is great. I never knew about it.
December 18th, 2008 at 12:21 pm
You bring up a very good point about mass polygamy by a small percentage of Muslims. i am assuming that you are talkin about MUTAH which is Shia-based and not something that “Muslimah” would probably know about. Anyways, it does exist but often these things are not in the open and talked about when people do them.
December 18th, 2008 at 12:23 pm
King Urungezab (as you spell it) is one example out of millions. If you want a peaceful king look at Akbar.
December 18th, 2008 at 12:30 pm
Oh yeah there was the ancient practice of immortality elixirs which never worked! That’s a good one!
December 18th, 2008 at 12:36 pm
Yeah Wiccan should be there on the list but I don’t understand it. It looks like a modern shaman religion or a witchcraft religion so maybe that’s why it isn’t on the list.
FYI Islamic dowry is pretty nice when it is practiced the way it is supposed to be practiced. One hadith indicates that one woman wanted a garden for her dowry during Muhammad’s time. Unfortunately, due to jurisprudence and over-analyzation, most imams these days want you to give jewelry or something lame like that.
December 18th, 2008 at 6:30 pm
My sisters, my mother, and my grandmother are all Jehova’s Witnesses. Personally, I’m not, yet I’m not baptized in any other religion. I do believe in God and have read the Bible.
I do share many thoughts with the JW but there are somethings I have trouble with starting with the blood transfusion. I respect their opinions on why they don’t accept the blood of others, but I don’t comprehend fully. Also I’m having trouble with telling them I want to study politics, something they also don’t see in a good light.
BUT I guess its my own fault since I don’t want to provoke an argument like the ones above…..
December 18th, 2008 at 7:23 pm
joshua – to address your comments on Wicca, first off, not all of us use Tarot cards and for the most part they are not necessarily an integral part of Wiccan ritual. More often than not they are used beforehand to determine how favorable it is to perform your spell or rite, and many different forms of divination are used, not just the tarot. As for “a billion candles”, that is not exclusive to Wicca. Been inside a Catholic church lately? As for the colors you mentioned, as far as I know there are only 3 – “Black”, which is usually harmful and selfish in nature, “Grey” which is done with a good intention but can still be selfish, while “White” is good intentioned and selfless magic. Example – a “Black” spell would be a curse on someone to harm them, “Grey” would be a love spell on someone else in your favor, good intentions for happiness but it’s still going against the other person’s will, and “White” would be a healing spell cast on a sick person. As for the rest of the colors, perhaps you were sitting in on a game of Magic: The Gathering? (I like a white/green deck combo myself)
My point is, it’s easy to bash what you don’t understand. I’ll leave you with my favorite quote: “Minds are like parachutes; they only function properly when open.”
December 21st, 2008 at 3:52 pm
Digambaras!? Wearing the environment? What the world? My jewish friends:transferring sin to the chickens and then giving them to the poor. Don’t the impoverished have enough problems with having to eat sinned ladened poultry? Mormon Baptism of the dead: Baptism is an outward show of an inward faith. Got to be alive for that! Excorisms: the devil is real. Bless those with the gift to kick him out of others. Romans 10:9, people. READ it and BELIEVE it!
January 4th, 2009 at 4:47 pm
i think fasting in sumthing called ramadan is kinda weird, a fellow student came to school as normal and she was fasting that day, she couldnt concentrate, had a stomach ache and felt faint. I know its sumthing religious people do for theyre Gods, but i personally think its torture if i have to do it, maybe even dangerous :/ duno
January 10th, 2009 at 6:36 pm
“Shamans were used in Tibetan Buddhism as a form of divination by which the Dalai Lama was given prophesies of the future and advice.”
Were used? Tibetan Buddhism?
No. Just no.
Tibetan shamans existed BEFORE the Buddhists came to Tibet from India and – like all other major world religions – beat the natives into submitting to their gods. These were the Bonpo. Bon is the indigenous spiritual tradition of Tibet. Tibetan Buddhism has absorbed many elements of the Bon tradition. This still includes the Dalai Lama’s consultation of the Nechung Oracle…the shaman to which the article refers in relation to the Dalai Lama.
January 25th, 2009 at 1:48 am
What about Jainism? I think that’s what it’s called, the one where they don’t believe in killing anything, including bugs? They wear face masks to prevent breathing any in, and carry a broom to sweep the suckers out of their path. Now that’s strange.
January 25th, 2009 at 2:32 am
yeah jainisms awesome
February 9th, 2009 at 5:11 pm
wow reading all the threads was quite intresting… i have heard of a wierd practice that hindu brahmins still do or used put cows urine into food on special religious days.. and ive heard this a few times never understood y?
February 9th, 2009 at 7:26 pm
I only have one thing to add to this discussion:
http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/2008/03/17/the-seven-deadly-sins-of-religion/
…ok, two things
http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/2007/01/15/science-vs-faith/
February 9th, 2009 at 8:34 pm
to chris’ comment posted august 13… just to clarify,it is the CATHOLICS who symbolically eat the body and drink the blood of Jesus. CHRISTIANS are not practicing this. thanks
February 10th, 2009 at 3:22 pm
shmexiholz- yes fasting can be difficult on some people but as muslims we are to fast 3 days in the month so we can prepare our bodies for ramadan. its not torture. Also it sounds like your friend was suffering. It would be best to see if she has a medical condition first, like diabetes, if so she could be exempt from fasting and would have to do ramadan another way. Like giving to charity everyday, feeding a fasting or poor person.
February 11th, 2009 at 9:25 am
wikipedia? that’s what you use as a source?
February 11th, 2009 at 9:27 am
and to kityap: chatholics ARE christains. idiot.
February 11th, 2009 at 3:57 pm
. kityap-when i was a baptist, we did the drinking the blood (cranberry juice) and eating flesh (crackers)
i believe all christians do that at least once a month on sunday.
February 16th, 2009 at 3:30 pm
Here are 7 Weirdest beliefs
1. To believe only your God, your dogma right, without offering any proof
2. To kill other people to your religion, for Islam that one of the most holiest duty with a reward of 72 virgins
3. believe is ghosts as god — the holy trinity
4. to conduct mass genocide as done by the christians
5. to drink blood of the god, jesus!
6. to search for eggs on easter
7. to worship god who could not save himself
February 16th, 2009 at 3:34 pm
203. James – October 16th, 2008 at 12:15 am
Since I live in India.
James is welcome to leave India. He is already converted, slave/agent of the west, who has not love or attachment for Indian culture and tradition. He is pretty much a patheitic disconnected Indian, living off funds from western churches.
I see such indians begging for money in missionary websites.
This one indian we can do without.
February 18th, 2009 at 5:48 am
James – If you aren’t a Hindu, you wouldn’t understand any of our practices. That also means that you criticism is superficial and out of place.
Sati – Practice that is banned by govt. Very few cases in the current environment. Sati needs to be understood from the context of time. During the mughal rule and earlier, Hindus were murdered in thousands by the Muslim invaders or forcibly converted. Sati was a practice of the widows to offering oneself to death rather than be killed or raped.
Linga – The attribution of Lingam to penis came from western scholars and not Indian saints. There is enough material for the interested in the way Hindus interpret the Lingam.
Kali: Kali is viewed as the god of destruction. Her husband – Shiva himself is the god of destruction. On a lighter note, that’s our view of telling men not to mess with their wives.
Dowry – Please stop this nonsense about christians and muslims not paying dowry. I know from personal situations that Dowry exists across all religions. Not that i support the practice one bit.
Three Crore god and goddesses: What’s wrong with it? If you can have a few thousand saints, why not a few crore Gods. If one can accept 10,000 saints in christianity in 2000 years, why not 30 million when Hindus believe that Earth is 4 billion years old?
caste system: The negatives of caste system came to the fore after the Britishers tinkered with it. At the core, it defined the rules and practices of day-to-day living. Some castes were treated badly (sudras, SCs, STs) but the others who claim to be victims now are doing pretty well.
Another thing James, why are the Indian christians and muslims hypocritic about caste system? When they want their communities to receive reservation in educational & govt jobs currently used to, they have no right to criticise caste systems.
Superiority of Brahmins: Funny that you levitate your hate towards brahmins. Who said all Hindu gods are brahmins? Isn’t Lord Rama avathar of Vishnu – He is a kshatriya. Isn’t Krishna avathar of Vishnu – He is a kshatriya/cow-herd?
Brahmins were the guardians of knowledge and hence more educated than the other castes. There are 2 subcastes in Brahmins – Teachers & Priests. The priest sub-caster were in-charge of learning all temple rituals and up-keep of temples. If business, wealth, kingdom can be passed by generation, why not temple up-keep? There are innumerable examples in mythology & current day where other castes run temples.
James – from your attacks, i can only sympathize with you. Either you aren’t a Hindu or you don’t know squat about Hinduism.
February 18th, 2009 at 5:54 am
question for hindus/brahmins: I have never heard of this. Of the hundreds of rituals that i follow, i am thankful that this isn’t one of it.
This could well be a rumor …
February 18th, 2009 at 5:57 am
raj:
You are the making the same mistake that you are accusing someone else with. Each religion have their own rituals. The rituals are based on one’s own belief. If you don’t follow a certain religion, you wouldn’t understand the belief, ritual or it’s importance. Hence, you have no freedom to criticize other’s rituals as long as it doesn’t affect you or bring harm to someone.
February 23rd, 2009 at 5:39 pm
All of your religions are complete bullshit. None of it is real. I was born as a Roman Catholic, but around about the same time i realised santa and the tooth fairy are not real i also realised that god is not real. Religion is just a way of controlling people,ignorant people. I dont understand how people can spend their whole lives follwing the writings of some idiots thousands of years ago. Think logically, how stupid were people in the middle ages? the answer is very, so then take that stupidty and increase it as you go further back in time, when barely anyone was literate so these religous tales travlled via word of mouth from unintelligant people until they reached the minority that could write.
The answer is simple, the pagan religions were more accurate than any other religions, as they worshipped nature, which led to people learning about nature, and thus science was born.
That is the answer, science.
Your religions probably only have one major book i.e. bible,toah,quran etc.that are all full out stories written by idiots.
Science has millions of books, full of facts and research from the smartest people in the world.
hhhmmmm i wonder which one is more likely to be the truth.
February 23rd, 2009 at 6:46 pm
239. Hugh
Didn’t see you on any other comments here. It takes a special kind of crazy to take a preemptive strike and bash other people for their religion on a list geared towards religious practices. Everyone needs faith and some need to place that faith in a specific religion. I am as leery of the anti-religious zealots as I am the religious zealots because they are both essentially trying to force their beliefs on me. I prefer to make my own decision without the need to be forced to an “educated” conclusion.
As far as the one book rant… Bible has several books within its two testaments…the Book of Job, the Book of Judith, The Gospels according to [specific apostle], etc. Judaism acknowledges the Torah (that consists of five books) as well as the Nevi’im, and the Kevutim (writings on Judaism based on discussions amongst rabbis). I don’t know much about Islam so I won’t make uneducated statements there.
Just put out a random point, I am not religious. What makes the two of us different is I choose not to be an insufferable, snotty prig. Take the anger down a notch… this is only a comment list on the internet. A name-calling rant will have even less effect on your powers to persuade the masses over to your brand of crazy than if you did this in a face to face setting.
Re: Wine and bread ‘controversy’
Christians take part in the bread and wine in some fashion (Catholics included). What is different with Catholics is they believe the eucharist makes Jesus present – a literal translation of “Body of Christ” and “Blood of Christ”. Most others view it more as partaking of food WITH Christ rather than OF Christ. Semantics.
Re: Fasting
I thought fasting during Ramadan was male participation only?? Like I said, I don’t know much about this religion. One of my roommates’ boyfriend practiced this but never saw any girls partake. Fasting is a common practice in many religions (eg. Jews do not eat pork, Catholics do not eat meat on the Fridays of Lent). It’s not torture. Fasting essentially means to withhold from foods (and in the case of Ramadan, liquids as well until sundown)… with the above examples, it doesn’t necessarily mean starving. Some Christians believe in a true fast (withhold from foods entirely) as a way to purify and strengthen prayers in times of need.
Also, to any Muslims out there! How hard is it for a non-Muslim to visit sites of worship? I’ve always had a fascination with religion from a sociology point view but never ventured too far with Islam (or with many religions for that matter) because I don’t want to offend.
February 23rd, 2009 at 7:07 pm
Re: Athiest depression
I think most of the atheist that are angry/depressed aren’t truly athiest. It’s not that they believe there’s no god but rather they believe in no god IN SPITE of god…confusing? What I am essentially trying to say is that denial of god in spite of god still means they believe in god (all to do with recognition). The negative feelings come from the fact that they have not found an alternative to their previous beliefs. Faith exists. The solution (which religion/nonreligion) is found when you know where to place it.
I for one am not depressed. I actually feel much better ridding myself of the guilt and contradictories of religion. A lot of it stems from a series of traumatic events in the recent past. I tried to find solace in church because that was what I was trained to do since birth and I didn’t find any peace or even a modicum of balance. I’ve always been skeptical of religion but it was then that I decided to ask ‘Why?’ and found I am ok without concepts of afterlife, I’m ok without the traditions and superstitions, I am ok with holding myself completely accountable rather than rely on an extra boost from ‘above’. Even if I am completely off-base, I doubt I’d regret making the decision myself rather than have others make the choices for me.
For a fairly accurate (and humorous) account of the atheistic discovery, perhaps listen in on Julia Sweeney’s “Letting Go of God”. There’s a bit of Mormon bashing, but overall, it discusses atheism without resorting to demeaning other religions.
February 25th, 2009 at 10:23 pm
239. Hugh – February 23rd, 2009 at 5:39 pm
Your religions probably only have one major book i.e. bible,toah,quran etc.that are all full out stories written by idiots.
Science has millions of books, full of facts and research from the smartest people in the world.
=========================
Hugh – Maybe you should try Hinduism. We have a huge collection of literature: 2 epics – RAMAYANA, MAHABARATHA, 4 vedas; 18 upanishads; 20 puranas; 18 upapuranas; hundreds of other statla puranas apart from hundreds of chant books and other epics.
Also, did you know that these documents are not just all about GOD/RELIGION but include science (puranas detail how universe was created from BIG BANG), NATURE (vedas) and PHILOSOPHY.
February 26th, 2009 at 5:53 pm
In response to chris:
They eat in rememberence of the body he sacrificed, and drink in rememberence of the blood sacrificed.
March 1st, 2009 at 12:28 pm
gabi319-
Fasting is for men and women who are able-bodied to do so. Women can not fast while on her period. Plus you said your roommate’s bf was fasting but not her, im assuming she isnt muslim, so therefore she wouldnt fast. Even though it wouldnt hurt to do so.
There are plenty of Islamic Centers you can go to, to receive knowledge about islam. Just go to one. lol
if your nervous to attend one here are some sites i frequent:
http://www.troid.org
http://www.bakkah.net
http://www.muttaqun.com
http://www.authenticstatements.com
March 2nd, 2009 at 3:51 pm
The scientology e-meter is unrelated to thetans (and thetans are not aliens any more then the christian god is a “big giant sky alien”, they are souls.)
The e-meter is supposed to measure the influence of built up negative emotions and the influence of memories of pain and unconsciousness, which scientologists call “charge”.
March 9th, 2009 at 10:46 am
completely agree with you.Now i am a regular visitor of your blog.waiting for more
March 9th, 2009 at 1:59 pm
What about the Pentecostal Church speaking in tongues??
March 10th, 2009 at 9:08 pm
Take yer pick:
…. Sometimes it’s weirdness that makes the world go ’round…
…. Seems to me all of this is one form or another of mental masturbation.
…. All religions have an element of compulsive-obsessive disorder.
…. If ya want something to defend….get religion(ious)
March 26th, 2009 at 6:50 pm
what about the religious cult that play with snakes, believing it’s holy? That should be Number one on all lists, beating out a Scientology by a mile. Lucky they don’t play with black Mambas or Taipan snakes.
March 30th, 2009 at 8:44 am
On the dowry…If the man is in debt to his wife upon marrying her, seems like they have it figured out. Its no different than most of the marriages today, where the man is in debt to the wife upon divorce. They just take care of it ahead of time. So feel happy to know that not just American women are gold diggers.
March 30th, 2009 at 6:27 pm
It’s a tradition in Christian churches about once a month I believe where they have like a cracker and a small sip of grape juice. The grape juice symbolizes the blood Jesus has shed and the cracker symbolizes if I can remember the flesh that Jesus gave on earth to die for the sins of every person on earth. It’s called communion and it’s not weird.
March 31st, 2009 at 2:46 pm
Bob – of course, it’s not weird to you if you’re a believer of it. It’s like an outsider saying sucking blood is weird, but to “vampires” it’s not. Don’t get offended by a secular and inoffensive list, because when it comes down to it, all you ARE doing is eating a cracker and sipping juice but there is a lot more to it that gives it that grandeur if you believe.
April 19th, 2009 at 4:56 pm
I must admit I’m a little scared to comment on this list. If I say anything different from what someone else believes I’ll be considered an idiot. I’d like to say that I’m 16 so I’m sure you’ll all think I’ve been brainwashed haha. What I find not fair is that people who don’t believe in “religion” say that people who do are weak and only looking for a way out of death. Have you ever thought that it takes a lot of faith and trust to believe in something bigger than yourself and to commit yourself to that. You still may think I’m stupid, but I think that maybe you are the one who is close-minded and afraid to examine the idea that there is a God and that he is in control.
April 20th, 2009 at 4:28 pm
believer…you sound pretty smart to me
April 20th, 2009 at 4:47 pm
Believer, you don’t sound stupid by any means. You are making a perfectly rational statement.
April 21st, 2009 at 4:12 pm
thanks
and also my church has a practise that people may think is very weird. Some others have mentions that they think communion is strange. We practise communion and along with that we do a ceremonial feetwashing also. We do it because Jesus washed his disciples feet at the last supper. We don’t believe that Jesus demanded us to literally wash each others feet, but we do it to remind us of the reason why he did it and to humble ourselves and serve others. I know a lot of people who are grossed out by feet haha, but I think it’s a nice reminder.
April 29th, 2009 at 3:06 am
Religion really is the opiate of the masses. It began as a political tool of control & repression through fear and remains such today. One day perhaps humanity will evolve beyond it’s uncritical dependence on superstition. Then again, the next great holy war may wipe us all to extinction before that could come to pass. Sad really.
April 29th, 2009 at 3:31 am
257. William Lee : Not *all* religion is bad, keep opinions like that to yourself…
April 29th, 2009 at 3:47 am
Gotta love the effort you put into this blog
May 2nd, 2009 at 1:21 am
at my cousins church they walk on hot coals each year… i have no clue what it is supposed to be for but i always thought my cousins were crazy for doing it lol
May 3rd, 2009 at 1:19 pm
I really liked your article. Keep up the good work.
May 3rd, 2009 at 7:01 pm
258. Mark – April 29th, 2009 at 3:31 am :
Yes, *all* religions *are* bad. And you can keep your opinions to yourself, as well.
May 4th, 2009 at 6:56 am
http://listverse.com/bizarre/10-weird-religious-practices/#comment-98647
Perhaps I can offer this up as a clarification.
Many religions offer good ideas. All religions also include bad ideas/misnomers/red herrings. It would be disingenuous (radical? fanatical?) for anyone to claim their religion had done/can do no wrong. I’m speaking to all religions. Western (Christian, Judaism, Islam, etc.), Eastern (Confucianism, Hindu, Buddhism, etc.), Indigenous (Druidic, Shamanism, etc.), Atheist, Agnostic (New Age, Wiccan, etc.), Cultist (SDA, Scientologist, etc.), Gaiaism, Libertarian, Liberal, Conservative, Socialist, Authoritarian, Monotheist, Polytheist, etc., etc., ad infinitum — The list goes on at least as long as the number of people that have died since the first organism took it’s first breath, it’s first heartbeat, tasted it’s own saliva for it’s first time (no matter whether it was ‘created’ or ‘evolved’ — if you’re still in that chapter, you’ve likely completely missed the boat).
I’d be a hypocrite to claim that I found no value in any of the above. All have good ideas, and all make excellent points. They all also make (as ‘religion’) many errors that cannot be supported. I’m not going to claim I can ‘disprove’ any of them, and I’m afraid that’s not my point. As well, I do not ask for proof in regards to any of their validity. That also misses my point.
I’d be both a hypocrite AND a liar to claim that I knew anything.
Believe what you believe. If anyone tells you to believe other than what you have absolute certainty of in your own soul (or makes points your soul has never taken the time to digest), do so at the peril of society at large. Live as you love. Wholly, completely, absolutely. Not easy, and I cannot claim success here. I’m not suggesting anyone take my path, I merely hope more will choose their own, that’s where the true power lie.
Sorry, did I use the term ’soul’? I can’t honestly say I believe in one, or rather if I were to explain my usage of the term, that would be a whole new diatribe
As I see it (take with salt, as you will), religion is an attempt to over-simplify the interpersonal connection with the world at large. Politics, in other words. Religion = Politics. Politics = Religion. Good for endless debates, such as these comments, but little else
And I feel I must add (peremptorily), I make no argument against personal spirituality and/or individual practices (this includes those who congregate with others who have overlapping ideologies, hell that’s any place where people gather for entertainment at the very least) — it’s Religion with a capital ‘R’ in which can be observed a historically oppressive and ultimately counter-productive role in culture and society as a whole that leaves me cold.
Gesundheit
May 5th, 2009 at 1:09 pm
I feel like “religion” just puts it in a category. Like this is my career, this is my love life, this is my religion etc. We make it sound like it’s a little section of our life that doesn’t mean much. Just something to fill up our day. That’s not what God is to me. He’s there all the time, He loves me, He gives me life and purpose, He permeates my entire life. I feel like calling it my religion cheapens it. To me, God is personal.
May 14th, 2009 at 11:34 am
Well Whattadya know, yet another great site to add to my reader! Google blog search has you pretty well indexed it seems! you have some brilliant quit smoking stuff here!
May 16th, 2009 at 12:45 pm
hmm. i can see that too non-Jehovahs wittnesses, no-blood treatment may seem weird. But i find it strange that it up their.
Why?
well, matters such as ‘hell and the ‘trinity’ have FAR FAR FAR less evidence going for them (eg. biblical evidence) as oppsosed to no-blood which has ALOT more biblical proof (ie constant commands to abstain from it and to not have it)
nonetheless, another intressting liss jF.
HOWEVER jFraters, it is a direct lie that ‘a small minority’ do not accept the doctrine of no-blood. that principle is a cornerstone of the our faith and this aspect of worship must be followed. there are no if or buts.
May 19th, 2009 at 8:27 am
great site, great images, inspiring!
May 20th, 2009 at 1:23 pm
Everyone make mistake..I always do too..
How to subscribe to your blog?
May 24th, 2009 at 2:27 am
Not everyone can share good information on the net. Have a nice day, pal.
May 27th, 2009 at 9:06 pm
Hey mate.
How do you manage the
blog bandwidth?
June 2nd, 2009 at 4:48 am
How can we subscribe?
June 2nd, 2009 at 8:53 pm
Hmm, so clothing worn in recognition of a covenant is weirder than e-meters and exorcisms? Whatever floats your boat!
June 3rd, 2009 at 11:46 pm
Please keep us with up to date good information..
June 4th, 2009 at 2:03 am
Stumbled upon your blog and read a few of your postings.. Nice blog. Keep up the good work. Looking forward to reading more from you in the future.
June 9th, 2009 at 7:00 am
What makes Niqad bizzare? NOT putting it on is bizzare.
June 11th, 2009 at 2:51 pm
The Scientology E-Meter is such a scam. I was in Hollywood about 8 years ago and me, my brother, and a few of our friends walked past a Church of Scientology. They asked us if we wanted to take a personality test and we agreed. They asked us a bunch of questions for maybe 15-20 minutes.
After they read the results and they told me I’m depressed (which I wasn’t) and kept asking “What’s wrong? Are you happy? Is something wrong?” because of how my results turned out. Soon I actually started to few bad. They started promoting how scientology will help me and all that stuff. After a while of them trying to convince me I said no, not interested, and met my friends and left. When we all got outside we found out that all 6 of us were “depressed or not happy.” We all had the same results. Give me a break! A bunch of lying scammers.
June 18th, 2009 at 2:14 pm
These religious beliefs entertain me so. I find them comparable to a roadside accident as I drive by..I just can’t look away.
These odd practices have and will evolve over time. In order for a religion to survive, it has to evolve. What’s funny is that none of them believe in the theory of evolution.
I have Mormon in-laws and boy do they get quiet and quick to change the subject when I talk about their magic underwear.
June 20th, 2009 at 12:50 am
Hey Stupid Guys. Who told you that Dowry is a Religious Ceremony?? It is a social evil that has come into the Indian Context over the past 200 years, affects Indian Muslims, Sikhs, Hindus and Christians also…please do some research before putting such stuff
I think you should include “Aghora” practices, the drinking of the blood and eating flesh of Jesus and such other practice in this
June 20th, 2009 at 10:48 am
You forgot the Jewish tradition of sacrificing pigeons and goats by bashing them to death on rocks and then slinging the blood all over everyone.
Those crazy Jews!
July 20th, 2009 at 2:29 pm
Religious practices are the outhouse-rat craziness of human beings, who have proven amply through history that they are capable of believing all forms of nonsense. Why would an omnipotent Prime Source care whether one immerses in oneself in water, wears or doesn’t wear a particular garment, strangles chickens, runs around nude, or any of the other myriad forms of bizarre behavior men have devised in the name of God? If it makes you feel more holy to hop around on one leg for a year, swallow a gallon of cow pee on the full moon, or lick a toads toe, as long as the rest of us aren’t proscribed for not doing so, have at it. Personally, I see the universe as essentially impersonal and without sentiment (visit the Serengeti Plain sometime, if you want to observe just how merciless biological life is structured…), and I cannot image a supreme being who gives a hoot what sort of gymnastics we little carbon units perform in order to please It. In the words of Kurt Vonnegut, who witnessed plenety of the absurdity of human flailing about: Say what you will about the sweet miracle of unquestioning faith, I consider a capacity for it terrifying and absolutely vile!
August 8th, 2009 at 12:13 pm
Can you tell me what template you’re using for your blog? Thanks!
September 5th, 2009 at 7:24 am
This article is actually well written, and despite a few ignorant comments on the whole it’s quite interesting to hear from everyone.
I’m Hindu, and comment #203 was hurtful and unkind. All religions have their fallacies, true, but the “facts” that he/she/it listed was twisted.
I think the comment about Kali-Amman was the worst. Copulating with a corpse?? Where the hell did you get that information??
Many people have asked me why goddess Kali looks so demonic. Well, you know the old adage, fight fire with fire. The Goddess Kali is a destroyer of demons, and she had to be as powerful and bloodthirsty as they are. She is only terrible to the evil spirits and the sinful, but very loving to devotees. She is actually the Universal Mother to Hindus. Think about it – when you have trouble in your life, don’t you go running to your mom? Goddess Kali is like Supermom, saving the universe.
She’s depicted as standing over a demon, symbolically the demon of ignorance. She’s keeps it in check so man can pursue higher knowledge.
Alternatively, she’s standing on her consort, Lord Shiva. The stories have it that after the battle, she began dancing in bloodthirsty joy, and because she’s so powerful the universe’s safety was threatened. Lord Shiva lay among the corpses, and when she stepped on him, the shame of it caused her to bite her tongue.
To insult another religion shows extreme low-mindedness and a certain degree of fear. If you are comfortable in what you believe in, then other faiths should not threaten you.
September 7th, 2009 at 8:47 pm
Very nice information. Thanks for this.
September 11th, 2009 at 11:15 am
Great info’s. I have added your blog to my blog roll. Here’s mine http://jasperizer.wordpress.com/
Good day
September 25th, 2009 at 2:07 am
The Aghori are a Hindu sect believed to have split off from the Kapalika order (which dates from 1000 AD) in the fourteenth century AD.[1] Most other Hindus condemn them as non-Hindu because of their cannibalistic rituals.[2] Aghoris or Aughads command extreme reverence from rural populations as they are supposed to possess powers to heal and relieve pain gained due to their intense practices.
Aghori ascetics, while being devotees of the Hindu God Shiva in Shiva’s form as Lord Bhairava, are monists who adhere to the common Hindu belief in liberation (moksha) from the cycle of reincarnation (samsara). This liberation is a realization of the self’s identity with the absolute. Because of this monistic doctrine, the Aghoris maintain that all opposites are ultimately illusory. The purpose of embracing pollution through various practices is the realization of non-duality through transcending social taboos, and seeing the illusory nature of all conventional categories. The Aghoris are not to be confused with the shivnetras, who are also ardent devotees of Shiva but do not indulge in extreme ritual worship practices known to some extent as Tamasic (rituals involving some or all of the following: meat eating, alcohol drinking, consumption of beverages and foods with opiates, hallucinogens and cannabis products as key ingredients, cannibalism, residing in cremation grounds, and Tantric sexual rituals). Although they enjoy close ties with the shivnetras, netras are a complete opposite of the aghoris and are purely Sattvic in nature and worship.
In essence, Aghoris base their beliefs on two principles. First, that Shiva is perfect. Second, that Shiva is responsible for everything; every rock, tree, animal, and even every thought. Due to this, everything that exists must be perfect, and to deny the perfection of anything would be to deny the sacredness of all life in its full manifestation, as well as deny God/Goddess and the demigods perfection.[citation needed] Aghoris eat any form of food and intoxicants, engage in a variety of sexual practices, ritually and otherwise, and also meditate on dead bodies for some rituals as prescribed in Hindu Tantric holy scriptures.[3]
The Aghoris distinguish themselves from other Hindu sects and priests by their alcoholic and cannibalistic rituals. The corpses, which may be either pulled from a river [including Ganges] or obtained from cremation grounds, are consumed both raw and cooked on open flame, as the Aghoris believe that what others consider a “dead man” is, in fact, nothing but a natural matter devoid of the life force it once contained. Therefore while for ordinary folks cannibalism may be seen as primitive, barbaric as well as unclean, for aghoris it is being both resourceful and subverting the common stereotypes placed on such taboos into a spiritual ascertainment that indeed nothing is profane nor separate from God, who is hailed to be all and in all. In fact, the Aghoris see it as a scientific approach in trying to discover how matter converts from one form to another.[5]
November 3rd, 2009 at 8:05 pm
Niqab is not obligatory, some Muslims do it because they do not only aim to be in the doors of heaven but they try to aim the highest heaven that is why they try to do this things which for me is good..and some just wants to protect their face from dust or sand storms..
about the dowry, the man can rescind if he cannot give, some are just fools who give to much which makes people evaluate the husband in a different level.my opinion is that it is better to understand your daughters husband rather than knowing him later in life.
November 9th, 2009 at 12:15 am
As someone who was raised as a Jehovah’s Witness all I can say about the blood transfusions is that they only accept plasma, which is usually not enough to save you. I hated the fact that my mother would tell the schools not to give me a blood transfusion if it meant saving my life.
My grandfather would didn’t want to take the doctors advise and use a blood transfusion when he had a 7 hour surgery. Luckily he survived the surgery, but it was a close call.
I don’t understand how anyone could let them selves or a family member die because of something like this. I can say from personal experience and observations that I truly cannot believe that Jehovah’s Witnesses are a religion based on love. (They disown family members and shun them if they were baptized and later decide not to go to Meetings any more). I am so glad I was never baptized.
November 19th, 2009 at 3:56 am
To those who are busy bitching about dowry not being religious, read the first line of the entry. He states there this is cultural and not religious.
November 20th, 2009 at 3:10 am
hey…..they are so……………and how is dowry a religious ceremony??????just stupid and idiotic