[WARNING] This list contains descriptions and images of human experimentation which may cause offense to some readers.] Human experimentation and research ethics evolved over time. On occasion, the subjects of human experimentation have been prisoners, slaves, or even family members. In some notable cases, doctors have performed experiments on themselves when they have been unwilling to risk the lives of others. This is known as self-experimentation. This is a list of the 10 most evil and unethical experiments carried out on humans.

The Stanford prison experiment was a psychological study of human responses to captivity and its behavioral effects on both authorities and inmates in prison. The experiment was conducted in 1971 by a team of researchers led by psychologist Philip Zimbardo at Stanford University. Undergraduate volunteers played the roles of both guards and prisoners living in a mock prison in the basement of the Stanford psychology building.
Prisoners and guards rapidly adapted to their roles, stepping beyond the boundaries of what had been predicted and leading to dangerous and psychologically damaging situations. One-third of the guards were judged to have exhibited “genuine” sadistic tendencies, while many prisoners were emotionally traumatized and two had to be removed from the experiment early. Finally, Zimbardo, alarmed at the increasingly abusive anti-social behavior from his subjects, terminated the entire experiment early.

The Monster Study was a stuttering experiment on 22 orphan children in Davenport, Iowa, in 1939 conducted by Wendell Johnson at the University of Iowa. Johnson chose one of his graduate students, Mary Tudor, to conduct the experiment and he supervised her research. After placing the children in control and experimental groups, Tudor gave positive speech therapy to half of the children, praising the fluency of their speech, and negative speech therapy to the other half, belittling the children for every speech imperfection and telling them they were stutterers. Many of the normal speaking orphan children who received negative therapy in the experiment suffered negative psychological effects and some retained speech problems during the course of their life. Dubbed “The Monster Study” by some of Johnson’s peers who were horrified that he would experiment on orphan children to prove a theory, the experiment was kept hidden for fear Johnson’s reputation would be tarnished in the wake of human experiments conducted by the Nazis during World War II. The University of Iowa publicly apologized for the Monster Study in 2001.

Project 4.1 was the designation for a medical study conducted by the United States of those residents of the Marshall Islands exposed to radioactive fallout from the March 1, 1954 Castle Bravo nuclear test at Bikini Atoll, which had an unexpectedly large yield. For the first decade after the test, the effects were ambiguous and statistically difficult to correlate to radiation exposure: miscarriages and stillbirths among exposed Rongelap women doubled in the first five years after the accident, but then returned to normal; some developmental difficulties and impaired growth appeared in children, but in no clear-cut pattern. In the decades that followed, though, the effects were undeniable. Children began to suffer disproportionately from thyroid cancer (due to exposure to radioiodines), and almost a third of those exposed developed neoplasms by 1974.
As a Department of Energy Committee writing on the human radiation experiments wrote, “It appears to have been almost immediately apparent to the AEC and the Joint Task Force running the Castle series that research on radiation effects could be done in conjunction with the medical treatment of the exposed populations.” The DOE report also concluded that “The dual purpose of what is now a DOE medical program has led to a view by the Marshallese that they were being used as ‘guinea pigs’ in a ‘radiation experiment.’”

Project MKULTRA, or MK-ULTRA, was the code name for a CIA mind-control research program, run by the Office of Scientific Intelligence, that began in the early 1950s and continued at least through the late 1960s. There is much published evidence that the project involved the surreptitious use of many types of drugs, as well as other methodologies, to manipulate individual mental states and to alter brain function.
Experiments included administering LSD to CIA employees, military personnel, doctors, other government agents, prostitutes, mentally ill patients, and members of the general public in order to study their reactions. LSD and other drugs were usually administered without the subject’s knowledge and informed consent, a violation of the Nuremberg Code that the U.S. agreed to follow after WWII.
Efforts to “recruit” subjects were often illegal, even discounting the fact that drugs were being administered (though actual use of LSD, for example, was legal in the United States until October 6, 1966). In Operation Midnight Climax, the CIA set up several brothels to obtain a selection of men who would be too embarrassed to talk about the events. The men were dosed with LSD, and the brothels were equipped with one-way mirrors and the “sessions” were filmed for later viewing and study.
In 1973, CIA Director Richard Helms ordered all MKULTRA files destroyed. Pursuant to this order, most CIA documents regarding the project were destroyed, making a full investigation of MKULTRA virtually impossible.

South Africa’s apartheid army forced white lesbian and gay soldiers to undergo ‘sex-change’ operations in the 1970′s and the 1980′s, and submitted many to chemical castration, electric shock, and other unethical medical experiments. Although the exact number is not known, former apartheid army surgeons estimate that as many as 900 forced ‘sexual reassignment’ operations may have been performed between 1971 and 1989 at military hospitals, as part of a top-secret program to root out homosexuality from the service.
Army psychiatrists aided by chaplains aggressively ferreted out suspected homosexuals from the armed forces, sending them discretely to military psychiatric units, chiefly ward 22 of 1 Military Hospital at Voortrekkerhoogte, near Pretoria. Those who could not be ‘cured’ with drugs, aversion shock therapy, hormone treatment, and other radical ‘psychiatric’ means were chemically castrated or given sex-change operations.
Although several cases of lesbian soldiers abused have been documented so far—including one botched sex-change operation—most of the victims appear to have been young, 16 to 24-year-old white males drafted into the apartheid army.
Dr. Aubrey Levin (the head of the study) is now Clinical Professor in the Department of Psychiatry (Forensic Division) at the University of Calgary’s Medical School. He is also in private practice, as a member in good standing of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta.

There have been many reports of North Korean human experimentation. These reports show human rights abuses similar to those of Nazi and Japanese human experimentation in World War II. These allegations of human rights abuses are denied by the North Korean government, who claim that all prisoners in North Korea are humanely treated.
One former North Korean woman prisoner tells how 50 healthy women prisoners were selected and given poisoned cabbage leaves, which all the women had to eat despite cries of distress from those who had already eaten. All 50 were dead after 20 minutes of vomiting blood and anal bleeding. Refusing to eat would have meant reprisals against them and their families.
Kwon Hyok, a former prison Head of Security at Camp 22, described laboratories equipped respectively for poison gas, suffocation gas and blood experiments, in which 3 or 4 people, normally a family, are the experimental subjects. After undergoing medical checks, the chambers are sealed and poison is injected through a tube, while “scientists” observe from above through glass. Kwon Hyok claims to have watched one family of 2 parents, a son and a daughter die from suffocating gas, with the parents trying to save the children using mouth-to-mouth resuscitation for as long as they had the strength.

The Poison laboratory of the Soviet secret services, also known as Laboratory 1, Laboratory 12 and “The Chamber”, was a covert poison research and development facility of the Soviet secret police agencies. The Soviets tested a number of deadly poisons on prisoners from the Gulag (“enemies of the people”), including mustard gas, ricin, digitoxin and many others. The goal of the experiments was to find a tasteless, odorless chemical that could not be detected post mortem. Candidate poisons were given to the victims, with a meal or drink, as “medication”.
Finally, a preparation with the desired properties called C-2 was developed. According to witness testimonies, the victim changed physically, became shorter, weakened quickly, became calm and silent and died within fifteen minutes. Mairanovsky brought to the laboratory people of varied physical condition and ages in order to have a more complete picture about the action of each poison.
In addition to human experimentation, Mairanovsky personally executed people with poisons, under the supervision of Pavel Sudoplatov.

The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male was a clinical study, conducted between 1932 and 1972 in Tuskegee, Alabama, in which 399 (plus 201 control group without syphilis) poor — and mostly illiterate — African American sharecroppers were denied treatment for Syphilis.
This study became notorious because it was conducted without due care to its subjects, and led to major changes in how patients are protected in clinical studies. Individuals enrolled in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study did not give informed consent and were not informed of their diagnosis; instead they were told they had “bad blood” and could receive free medical treatment, rides to the clinic, meals and burial insurance in case of death in return for participating. In 1932, when the study started, standard treatments for syphilis were toxic, dangerous, and of questionable effectiveness. Part of the original goal of the study was to determine if patients were better off not being treated with these toxic remedies. For many participants, treatment was intentionally denied. Many patients were lied to and given placebo treatments—in order to observe the fatal progression of the disease.
By the end of the study, only 74 of the test subjects were still alive. Twenty-eight of the men had died directly of syphilis, 100 were dead of related complications, 40 of their wives had been infected, and 19 of their children had been born with congenital syphilis.

Unit 731 was a covert biological and chemical warfare research and development unit of the Imperial Japanese Army that undertook lethal human experimentation during the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945) and World War II. It was responsible for some of the most notorious war crimes carried out by Japanese personnel.
Some of the numerous atrocities committed by the commander Shiro Ishii and others under his command in Unit 731 include: vivisection of living people (including pregnant women who were impregnated by the doctors), prisoners had limbs amputated and reattached to other parts of their body, some prisoners had parts of their bodies frozen and thawed to study the resulting untreated gangrene. Humans were also used as living test cases for grenades and flame throwers. Prisoners were injected with strains of diseases, disguised as vaccinations, to study their effects. To study the effects of untreated venereal diseases, male and female prisoners were deliberately infected with syphilis and gonorrhea via rape, then studied. A complete list of these horrors can be found here.
Having been granted immunity by the American Occupation Authorities at the end of the war, Ishii never spent any time in jail for his crimes and died at the age of 67 of throat cancer.

Nazi human experimentation was medical experimentation on large numbers of people by the German Nazi regime in its concentration camps during World War II. At Auschwitz, under the direction of Dr. Eduard Wirths, selected inmates were subjected to various experiments which were supposedly designed to help German military personnel in combat situations, to aid in the recovery of military personnel that had been injured, and to advance the racial ideology backed by the Third Reich.
Experiments on twin children in concentration camps were created to show the similarities and differences in the genetics and eugenics of twins, as well as to see if the human body can be unnaturally manipulated. The central leader of the experiments was Dr. Josef Mengele, who performed experiments on over 1,500 sets of imprisoned twins, of which fewer than 200 individuals survived the studies. Dr. Mengele organized the testing of genetics in twins. The twins were arranged by age and sex and kept in barracks in between the test, which ranged from the injection of different chemicals into the eyes of the twins to see if it would change their colors to literally sewing the twins together in hopes of creating conjoined twins.
In 1942 the Luftwaffe conducted experiments to learn how to treat hypothermia. One study forced subjects to endure a tank of ice water for up to three hours (see image above). Another study placed prisoners naked in the open for several hours with temperatures below freezing. The experimenters assessed different ways of rewarming survivors.
From about July 1942 to about September 1943, experiments to investigate the effectiveness of sulfonamide, a synthetic antimicrobial agent, were conducted at Ravensbrück. Wounds inflicted on the subjects were infected with bacteria such as Streptococcus, gas gangrene, and tetanus. Circulation of blood was interrupted by tying off blood vessels at both ends of the wound to create a condition similar to that of a battlefield wound. Infection was aggravated by forcing wood shavings and ground glass into the wounds. The infection was treated with sulfonamide and other drugs to determine their effectiveness.
This article is licensed under the GFDL because it contains text from Wikipedia.




















number 10 isnt particularly 'evil' in my opinion..we were taught about it in psychology – how evil can it be?!
are u kidding me….?
it still doesn't seem evil. it was a legitimate study without prior knowledge of consequences (if you can call it that). if anything, human nature is the evil component, which the study may suggest to some people.
I agree with that it was not evil at all, they were volenteers
It was also evil since the test subjects were starved and abused otherwise, and had no word in their participation. The hypothermia tests were the mildest–they also did many other tests that disfigured and killed the people. The fact that y’all don’t think that experimenting cruelly on children is puzzling to me…
“volenteers”??? would u volenteer for something like that? they took humans and subjected them to crule torture, in experiment for which they did not care the outcome, whether the victim lived or died. If you do not consider this evil, than where do you draw the line?
Some of you all are daft. The poster is commenting on the 10th evil human experiment which is listed FIRST on the article. The FIRST most evil human experiment is listed 10th.
The type of experimentation (number 10, listed 1st) isn’t inherently evil as is was conducted with consent. However human nature is the evil component of the experiment.
It’s “evil” because of the terrible stress that the subjects were put under, because of the torture involved, because of the inhumanity in the case. It teaches us a lot about human nature and helps explain why Abu Graihb etc have happened, but it was highly unethical.
the fact that rama cant understand what ‘number 10′ means is quite amusing
When I think about Nazi’s experiments and Unit 731′s, and trying to compare and order those two in a list well, I am convinced there shouldn’t be no number two and two firsts…
I will agree. I think that it may either be to over-saturation of Nazis, but I know that human experiments and atrocities have vastly surpassed that of the Nazis. Killing millions is terrible, but I think that Darfur has reached nearly it's 6 million point of genocide, and sadly the inhumane experimentation (torture, medical) is way beyond what Nazis have done.
It's sort of sick to think that Nazis were once thought of as the end all of evil, but damn it if humanity doesn't try to outdue itself. Pretty soon Nazis cruelties will simply be the foundation of sick behavior, but definitely not the ultimate evil. That is astonishingly frightening.
cool…
Pascal: I agree with you completely – I the end I put the Nazis first simply because of the fact that they murdered more people than the Japanese.
Not only is it terrifying to think that these things actually happened to real people, but that there were enough incidents to fill a “top ten” list…
And those are the ones we know.
Human race is unbelievable!!!
I was looking for articles on Science an Ethics for my students when I found this list and admit it’s one of the most shocking sbjects I have ever read about. feel numb jst imagining th atrocities that these people had to undergo.
I feel sorry for all the people who suffered. Unfortunately these atrocities will remain part of our History but what we should do now is make sure similar things never happen again
Appalling examples of mans inhumanity to man. Enough to make you weep at the horror that the victims must have endured.
I would hate to think that some of the information learned from these sick experiments is actually used today. But then again, if the info did help i suppose you could say that at least the poor people didn’t die for nothing….
A scary list J…..
BHO: as a matter of fact, according to Wikipedia – not only is it used – it is exclusively used in some fields:
Actually, human physiologists and the medical community have come to a consensus that this data is not useful, due to the conditions of the human subjects. Plenty of voluntary and safe experimentation has been done since then.
Now thats what i would call an ethical dilemma…Im not sure how i feel about that lol…You have to remeber that ‘the ends dont justify the means’ no matter how much the information has helped man kind as a whole, the nazis are still evil $%%^£$% !!! FACT!
Good list J
Not only Nazis, Japanese, Americans, Koreans… The entire human race.
Horrible but interesting.
Amazing the cruelty human beings are capable of as soon as they adopt a mind-set of superiority. Germans were superior to the Jews, Homo*****uals, and Gypsies that populated the camps. Japanese thought they were superior to everyone. The white doctors in the Tuskeegee Experiment thought themselves superior to the black fellas. (Guarantee it wouldn’t have happened with a bunch of white syphilis victims). Prejudice is Evil.
On a side note, it horrifies me that the dirt bag doctor from South Africa is employed and certified in Canada. I do believe I am going to write some letters. Jamie, could you save me some time, provide me with some sources? Thanks
It is not just prejudice that drives acts such as these but a seemingly harmless and powerfully unrecognized force: curiosity. Curiosity plus power is the perfect equation for experiments such as these and also for them to be done in an unsympathetic matter. The sad thing is that it is not just a flaw in these individuals or such corporations, but a disease that all man suffer from. There are forces out there that are stronger than our conscience and the ones we proclaim to be evil are the ones that could not find the balance between such forces. I blame not there names, but there hearts and their minds, and their weak souls.
God bless the ones that were lost due to a curious mind in the wrong position with the wrong tools.
Isn’t it time for a happy list? Top Ten Cutest Puppies… something like that?
i still cant believe that the human race can do that to ech other…its sickening,,,,,,
Randall; The last time we had a happy list it spawned flaming and false accusations. Lord, we almost had a war. I feel Emma Peel is responsible. She imprinted on you young, while you were vulnerable.
#% But but but Barbara Walters said these must be the happiest people in the world!
#% = #5
Mom:
Yes she did indeed. Several of my girlfriends, over the course of my life, ended up resembling her in one way or another. God, the power of the subconscious. Makes you shiver.
But I wouldn’t consider the Brunettes list to be a “happy” list anyway. That’s just a horny list.
I’m working on a nice list about wines though… that would kinda fit the bill.
After reading Unit 731, I now think the most horrifying thing to wake up to is seeing your legs and arms mixed up. That’s freaked me out big time
Wine is for pretentious people.
Randall: happy list? Are you kidding?!
Romerozombie; You idiot! Would you consider me pretentious?
Foul-mouthed, dope smokin’, rockin, and pretentious. I damn near fell off my chair. Now that is the one thing I have never been accused of. I certainly hope you were joking.
romerozombie: I am not pretentious and I only drink wine (well – sometimes spirits too).
“This particular wine makes a post-modern faux pas statement”
PRETENTIOS.
You guys areb’t pretentious, just wine-tasting in general.
Nazi’s do desearve #1, espeacially Josef Mengele!
I think one of the most grotesque things he did was rejoinig twins together!
romerozombie: oh – I agree with that as being pretentious
Almost as bad as people who sniff corks
Tuskegee is my hometown. I knew some of the victims of that awful study. Very, very sad.
These are all pretty awful to some degree.
As for using the information gathered from these experiments, there is no ethical dilemma. We can not change what happened an using or not using the information will make no difference to it. However, using the information may help humanity in some way.
I actually find the Japanese experiments in particular interesting so I might do some further reading later. Grotesque as that is.
“This particular wine makes a post-modern faux pas statement”
Somebody said that? What the hell does faux pas taste like?
Should taste like *****. Faux Pas is a mistake, no?
How about, Red, not too dry, not too sweet, not too vinegary, full-bodied? Thats what I go for. Sometimes I add spicy to the mix just for fun.
The interesting thing about #10 is that, unlike the other 9, all participants were volunteers. Although they didn’t know what fully would happen (nobody did, and the man who ran the experiment ended up being very surprised at how it turned out, and ended it.), they did, at, least, enter into it by choice.
To me, #10 isn’t evil. It wasn’t intended to be life-scarring, everyone participated of their own free will, and when things did go too far, it was ended, well before it was supposed to. (As opposed to the Tuskagee study, where they knew it’d gotten out, and gone too far, but they still chose to finish the study.)
http://www.prisonexp.org/ is the web site for the Stanford experiment. It is a fascinating look at how prison can set up certain conditions AND how things can spiral out of control.
Mom/Jamie:
No, see… this kid, romerozombie, is *****ed at me, and as 18 year olds are wont to do, he is immaturely chasing me on every thread I post in, and sticking in a little mocking statement about anything I say. So I mentioned to Mom that I was working on a list about wine–which, by the way, “romero,” Jamie asked me to write some time ago–and so he coughed up his cutesy “wine is for pretentious people.” Yes, romero, very clever. Go play now kid.
Cat Skyfire; I read the study. Amazing how quickly they were able to accomplish so much damage. They certainly could and should have realized sooner than they did just what was happening. The leader of the study should not have participated.
i did number 10 in psychology and i believe if i remeber correctly it also ended up in the guards beating and even rapeing some of the prisoners that to me is quite evil i may be wrong or it may be a similar experiment but thats what i was taught
That is incorrect young sir. If you read a similar experiment it definitely did not have similar results. No one was raped. And they were all male, non of which being homo*****ual or having homo*****ual desires. The test was done from a Marx-based viewpoint/curiosity. Nothing of such sort occurred. However, there were beatings but only minor, I do not believe it is right, simply correcting your presumption.
Randall/Randall/Randall; Don’t you ever know when to shut up?
I, and I imagine, Jamie, are well aware of Romerozombie’s predilection to irritate you. We or at least I was trying to take you out of the loop. Geez, I thought I was the only one with a big-ass mouth.
Mom (#11): I had no idea a dirtbag like that lived here either. It sickens me that he is in the same province as me.
just something i have noticed. on several discussions it has been posited that religion is evil and a scientific mindset is the way forward.
why is there no “throw the baby out with the bathwater” reaction to scientific thinking when realities like this are brought to light?
randall: i know that you have posted that religion has led to much good, so i guess this question is only intended for those that believe that religion is only negative.
Sure puts all the hype about Abu Ghraib in perspective, doesn’t it?
Bob; Large evil is no excuse for small evil. There is no excuse, that is the point.
Correct, there is no excuse, only reason. Most of which we do not understand with our feeble range of perspectives.
Mom424 – When I read about it, the leader of the study (speaking from the advantage of hindsight) was surprised, and in some ways horrified, that he HAD become a part of it. That he had, without realizing it, taken on the role of prison warden, to the point that he was upset that the real police would not help with a rumored breakout. It was not his intent to be a part of it, but it did occur.
One thing that he also indicated was he was surprised when people DIDN’T quit. Remember, nobody was an actual prisoner OR guard, and could walk away at any time. Several did just that but most did not.
For me, this one still isn’t an evil. Unfortunate, but not evil. Evil would have taken more control, an enforced lack of free will (such as things done to pows), and a disregard for the harms once they became serious in the desire to ‘complete the study’ (as in Tuskagee).
Cat – maybe I misread it, it was a while ago. I thought he “agreed” to take on the role when someone else stepped down. If not, I agree; Not evil, ill-advised, improperly supervised, and mostly unfortunate.
They used to do testing on orphans back in the late 1700s for things like cholera and yellow fever. Take someone you knew was sick (and doing things like puking and having diarrhea all over himself) and send him into the orphanage, encouraging the children top play in his excrement. Then, once you had a large, captive population with the disease, only treat half of them and leave the rest to die.
Don’t flatter yourself Randall, I’m not chasing you. I was just making a comment. I’ve got better things to do. Honestly!
great list, i haven’t head of a few of these like project 4.1, interesting…. nd Bob Abu Ghraib is not human experimentation, its POWs who are being subjected to different proven interrogation techniques because they have info we need. Now I do not agree with the Iraq, war, I hate bush yata yata yata, but if our military (which i strongly support no matter what the executive office decides to do with them) needs info, they can’t just be like “hey man can you please tell us where you guys plan on bombing next? hey we’ll give you a cookie if you tell us!” yea its tough but i mean stress positions and water boarding hardly resemble the horrors that the nazis or japanese inflicted on people during there times. also the stanford prison experiment i dont really beleive belongs on here, it was actually an intriguing experiment that went in a completely oppposite direction that the controlers has expected, and the results were actually pretty amazing and we learned alot about human nature (that a lot of us are truly dicks on the inside haha)
The problem with man now days is that we compare our own acts to the acts of others. Surrendering our conscience to the actions of those we might not even know. You should not compare the right or wrongs of our countries actions to the rights or wrongs of another. They have different beliefs, different perspectives; they might see us as the more evil. WE as humans should not fight to choose the lesser of 2 evils but to abolish them completely, even though realistically, this is virtually impossible.
HOWEVER, you make very strong points and are also very true.
i agree with BHO, very scary to think that these things happened and their is a chance that it can still happen or god forbid is in fact happening at this moment
Reading about the body parts moved around in Unit 731 reminded me of the LaLaurie woman.
Good list. Now though I have to get the knot out of my stomach
Ginny: I thought of her too! She was equally as evil as these guys.
Notable mention to Milgram? Not evil per se, but not exactly ethical.
At any rate, great list.
(ListVerse: keeping my co-workers entertained, one list at a time).
Interesting and sickening list.
I used to work for a guy named that was in Auschwitz as a teenager. The nazis placed a gun to his head and said if he made any noise he would be shot, then proceded to rip out both of his testicles without anesthetic. He later escaped, although the rest of his family was killed. His story was made into a book, which I can’t remember the name of as it was named after the number that was scrawled onto his arm, 8020something or other. The extent of evil is truly unbelievable.
The extent of curiosity is the true issue.
BishopWhiteT: I just can’t begin to comprehend the kind of mind that would allow a person to do that.
Its probably very naive to hope that stuff like this isnt happening anymore. We can hope tho….
The one common thread that runs through each of these stories, (and many more like them) is that each was conducted with the blessing and direction of government. This is why we need to take as much power as possible away from government and the mob. Even if the people we elect (or that seize power) are the nicest people in the world, ther is still the chance that they or their successors could engage in these atrocities. Even here in the US we are not immune from this kind of horror. Just because we don’t hear about it, doesn’t mean it isn’t happening.
The experiments sound horrible… Especially Unit 731 and the Nazi ones. However, what I find even more troubling is the fact that experiments like those are still being performed on animals, and so many people find that to be okay.
I learned about number 10 in my high school phyc class… very twisted stuff. To the point that my messed up teacher did a mock run of the experiment every day for one class period for a month.. yeah that was creepie, all i have to say is thank god that i was a gaurd, not a prisoner. Couldnt make me one, i was preggo at the time. And we do need a happy list. 10 cutest kitten pictures on photobucket? that would be nice… or puppies.. any cute baby animal… even bunnies would do, sence ester is comeing up. Jah, we need a happy list on here soon!
Nitta – You find it more troubling that experiments are being done on animals? Not that I agree animal experimentation (I don’t), but it’s amazing that you find animal experimentation “more troubling” than human experimentation.
its quite ironic the person the person chosen to do experiment 9 was called mary tudor.one of the most evil women in history
BishopWhiteT:
My wife did the same exact thing to me when we got married.
Sorry Nitta but for me you can cut up as many animals as you like if in the end you can save a single human life.
The worst thing about this list is how facinating it is it makes me feel dirty just to be interested in it. The only solace as with all history is that the more we learn from the past the more chance we have of avoiding the same horrible mistakes
Disturbing, but I am still about equally disturbed by the types of animal testing still going on to this very day. So I agree with Nitta. In this day and age, yes, it is completely messed up stuff like this STILL happens to animals. You think us humans would have learned from human experiments like this that experimenting on any living creature without it’s consent is wrong.
R. Nixon – That’s not funny.
i think that anyone involved with anything like this needs to die as soon as possible.
what a stain on the earth.