Following on from our list of the greatest and most successful military commanders, we are presenting this list of the worst. These are the incompetents, the idiots, the bumblers who have represented armies or nations at war only to lead them to defeat or shame. Feel free to mention any others you may know of in the comments.
Known as “Reverse” Buller by his troops during the Second Boer War, the Englishman was first defeated at the Battle of Colenso and subsequently lost his position as overall commander. He continued on to suffer defeats at Spion Kop and Vaal Krantz, almost letting the war slip away from the British.
After achieving moderate success in Libya and Ethiopia, the “Butcher of Ethiopia” became Commander-in-Chief of the Italian Royal Army’s General Staff and of Italian North Africa at the start of World War II. In 1940, after increasing pressure from dictator Benito Mussolini and facing demotion, Graziani followed orders and invaded Egypt with his Tenth Army. In 1941, Graziani resigned his commission after the British counterattacked and the Tenth Army was completely defeated during Operation Compass.
With high hopes set upon his shoulders at the beginning of the American Civil war, quickly becoming General-in-Chief of the Union Army, McClellan would earn the distinction as a general of little action. McClellan truly disappointed president Lincoln at the Battle of Antietam where the North and South would fight the bloodiest battle of the war. Despite the Union outnumbering the Confederates, McClellan was unable to crush Robert E. Lee after failing to pursue him into Virginia. McClellan was removed from command immediately after.
Under Westmoreland’s command, the Vietnam war began smoothly as the U.S. “won every battle.” But in 1968, when Westmoreland became Army Chief of Staff, Communist forces baited Westmoreland into committing nearly 40% of his strength to the military outpost at Khe Sanh, then attacked cities and towns throughout South Vietnam. This would be known as the Tet Offensive and would become a major turning point in the war. Westmoreland’s strategy throughout the war was to win through Attrition Warfare (pounding the enemy through greater numbers and resources) which military strategists including Sun Tzu caution against using. This strategy inevitably failed as the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong maintained control over how the war was fought which was through guerilla warfare. Westmoreland’s general mistake: severely underestimating the Communists.
Gamelin was commander of the French forces in World War II and is largely responsible for the fall of France into German control during the Battle of France. Gamelin made the mistake of viewing the Ardennes as impenetrable and chose to defend it with ten of his weakest, least well equipped and least well trained divisions. Gamelin also chose not to disperse France’s vast number of superior tanks. Despite reports of the build-up of German forces and even knowing the date of the Germans attack, Gamelin did nothing, stating that he would “await events”. After the Germans attacked, Gamelin was eventually removed from his post, but by then it was too late.
Percival was off mistreating Irish Republican Army (IRA) leaders during the Anglo-Irish War before commanding British Malaya in World War II. After only 10 weeks into the Pacific War, Percival became responsible for the largest surrender of British-led forces in history. Percival surrendered Malaya to Japanese forces in early 1942, defying Winston Churchill’s own instructions for prolonged resistance. A common view holds that 138,708 Allied personnel surrendered or were killed by fewer than 30,000 Japanese. Some historians are a little more sympathetic towards Percival’s legacy nowadays arguing that Percival had been dealt an unusually bad hand.
Grachev played a key role in initiating and leading the First Chechen War. He was responsible for coming up with the idea of using force to “restore constitutional order” in Chechnya. Grachev publicly promised to swiftly crush the Chechen separatist forces “in a couple of hours with a single airborne regiment.” He led the disastrous storming of Grozny while drunk after celebrating his birthday on January 1st. The initial assault resulted in very high casualties for the Russians and an almost complete breakdown of morale in the Russian forces. Grachev once said that only an “’incompetent commander’ would order tanks into the streets of central Grozny, where they would be vulnerable.” Yet near the end of the war he did exactly that. The war soon ended in a Russian defeat, with hundreds of thousands of military and civilian casualties. Grachev has also been linked to corruption among the higher ranks of the military, specifically the assassination of journalist Dmitry Kholodov.
The self proclaimed “Napoleon of the West” didn’t quite leave the same legacy as his idol. After early success in the Mexican War for Independence, the rest of his career didn’t pan out the way he would have liked. Santa Anna, a lifetime gambler, was known for his risk taking in battle, but also his brutality. Soon after declaring himself dictator of Mexico, rebels who opposed the Mexican dictatorship created three new republics, one of them being the Republic of Texas. In the famous Battle of the Alamo, Santa Anna struggled to defeat about 250 Texans with 2,400 Mexicans and subsequently lost nearly 600 men. Santa Anna would lose Texas at the Battle of San Jacinto. Again fighting outnumbered Texans, this time Santa Anna would lose the battle stunningly. The Texans only suffered 2 casualties, as opposed to hundreds of Mexican casualties. Santa Anna was found wearing a private’s uniform, hiding in a marsh.
The last king of the Achaemenid Empire of Persia, Darius was not quite as qualified to rule a mighty empire as his predecessors were. In 334 BC, Alexander the Great invaded the Persian Empire. Darius never showed up for the first battle and defeat (Battle of Granicus) because he didn’t see Alexander as much of a threat to his empire. Darius did not take the field against Alexander until a year and a half after Granicus, at the Battle of Issus. His forces outnumbered Alexander’s men by at least a 2 to 1 ratio, but Darius was still outflanked, defeated and forced to flee. Darius’ family would be captured and even lost the Battle of Gaugamela, where so many factors were in his favor. Darius again was the first to flee the battle, abandoning all of his soldiers and his property to be taken by Alexander. Darius quickly lost everything and became nothing but a fugitive. He would eventually be betrayed and killed by a friend. Thus it was under Darius’ rule that the Persian Empire fell and was conquered.
After occupying Jerusalem and crucifying 2,000 Jewish rebels in Judaea, Varus went off to govern Germania and tame barbarian tribes. Varus was stationed with three of his legions, the 17th, 18th and 19th when news arrived of a revolt growing in the Rhine area. The man who appealed for Varus’ help was Arminius, a Romanized Germanic prince. Varus’ trust in Arminius was an obvious and terrible misjudgment. Varus placed his legions in a position where their fighting strengths would be minimized and that of the Germanic Cherusci tribesman maximized. The Romans marched right into the ambush that Arminius laid thus leading to the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest. The heavily forested, swampy terrain made the Legions’ maneuvers impossible. The Germanic fighters demolished the three Roman legions. Some captured Romans were placed in wicker cages and burned alive, others were enslaved or ransomed. Germanic tribes sacrificed Roman officers on altars to their gods. Varus himself, seeing all hope was lost, committed suicide. Arminius cut off his head and sent it to another Germanic leader as a present. The Legion numbers XVII, XVIII and XIX never again appeared in the Roman Army’s order of battle due to the shame and ill luck they carried. The Battle of the Teutoburg Forest darkened Emperor Augustus’ remaining years and he was heard, upon occasion, to moan, “Quinctilius Varus, give me back my Legions!”
Notable mention: George Custer, Joseph Hooker, Ambrose Burnside, Charles Cornwallis, John II of France





























I disagree with Darius being on this list. Alexander invaded Asia Minor, which was 5000km away from the Persian capital at Persepolis. It would have taken him at least a month to travel to take command of his forces, the battle was over in an afternoon. He did not lose the battles and the war because he was an inferior leader, he lost because he had to cope with internal strife and an outdated military that his predecessors had left him, as well as being up against Alexander the Great. Alexander was an amazing leader, there is no shame in being defeated by a general of that calibre.
Darius commanded 1 000 000 men while Alexander had only 47 000. The battle took place in a field, where Darius could exploit his numbers. Persians had chariots, elephants, 40 000 cavalryman, while Alexander had only 7000 cavalryman. In the middle of the battle persians even outflanked Macedonians left flank, but persians didnt used it, they could attack Macedonians left flank, instead they attacked Macedonians camp. Persians lost the battle only thanks to their lack of command.
I agree with James. Elephants, Chariots, and other cavalry cannot withstand the phalanx formation of the Macedonians. That s why Darius lost the battle. The infantry of the persian empire was weak too against both alexanders cavalry and infantry. In my opinion, Darius was just an unlucky general to be caught in a war against the inevitable might of the greatest general in history
very good list, it seems that the biggest mistake is underestimating your opponent, even great leaders make big mistakes too, eg napolean in russia
Yes and Winston Churchill at Gallipoli
good list..for useless leaders..
tit for tat
I got so excited when I saw Santa Anna on this list. Growing up in Texas, one of my fondest childhood memories was watching a movie about the Mexican-American War in 7th grade Texas History class, then getting in an argument with the teacher over whether or not Santa Anna was a pedophile because of his very young wife.
I think there was a Greek king/general who was told by the soothsayer that the coming battle would see the end of a great kingdom. He interpreted that to mean the enemy kingdom, went gung-ho off into battle and comprehensively lost. The soothsayer had, in fact, been talking about his own kingdom. (On the other hand, the soothsayer might just have been having an each-way bet by way of an ambiguous statement.)
Yeah, Herodotus wrote about it in his Histories as the creation of the Persian empire, and the rise of Cyrus. Croesus, the king of Lydia, asked the oracle at Delphi what he should do, and the oracle replied "Attack and a great empire will be destroyed". Croesus attacked, and Cyrus destroyed absorbed Lydia after defeating Croesus in a series of battles.
Croesus, somehow, gained the respect of Cyrus and served as an adviser to Cyrus until his death of old age.
Great list … pretty informative & i only know 2 of these. Nice.
i know george w. bush is not a military leader but the president is the commander in chief, that being said…
@astraya (8): That was King Croesus of Lydia. The soothsayer was the Delphic oracle, Pythia.
good list. i’m Texan nice to see Santa Anna on here
Pavel Gratchev should be on the list
“He was rumoured to launch the disastrous storming of Grozny while drunk during the celebrations of his January 1 birthday. As TIME commented in 1995: “Grachev had remarked recently that only an ‘incompetent commander’ would order tanks into the streets of central Grozny, where they would be vulnerable (…) Yet at the end of December he did it.” Eventually, in July 1996, Yeltsin sacked the disgraced Grachev following his 1996 re-election. The war soon ended in a Russian defeat, with hundreds of thousands of military and civilian casualties.” in, Wikipedia
DOOOOPPPP!! sorry just saw he was on the list!! my bad!!!
Unbelievable people comment and even criticize lists they haven t read
Let me preface by saying that I don’t do military…but I have been reading a fictional historic novel and the last 100 pages I have read are using a famous war as a background to the story’s action. So my addition to the list is:
Napoleon the 3rd–and his sadly lacking generals–in their attempt to keep France out of the hands of the Prussians in the late 1800′s.
To all our LV regulars who DO know military…please help me with this one. I DO know that US Confederate General Sheridan was involved, as an adviser to the Prussians.
The French losses were miserable through their inept tactics, but as I said my knowledge comes from a fictional source, and any enlightenment would be appreciated.
@ peejee :
I did read the list before commenting but while scrolling down I missed #4!
Besides I recognized my error straight away… its not like I made my comment and then took 10 mins to read the list!!
@donald (2): Why wasn’t he landscaped?
I would have had custer on here
A cross between Jade Jagger and Al Gore would be the worst millitary leader. I hate them so much forever. Chuck a bit of Bono in to fine tune as required. Like pepper on a hatred sandwich of leadership failure. Good list though!
you should do your research on Cornwallis, he doesn’t deserve a notable mention at all
King John of England, on the other hand… well he wasn’t nicknamed ‘Softsword’ for being a military genius!
Interesteing list. I’d add France’s Neville, who commanded the French Army on the Western Front in 1917 and darn near lost the war. He thought he could defeat the Germans with one huge, mighty assault. But the Germans knew they were comming and prepared accordingly. They utterly destroyed the French attackers. Morale evaporated and French troops mutinied, refusing any further attacks. It took a combination of concessions and executions and changing of leadership to restore order and discipline — if not morale — to the French army. Amazingly, the Germans didn’t know (or didn’t know the extent of) the mutiny and thus took no adavnatge of it.
Neville, of course, was sacked.
what about the commanders that led the ANZAC’s (Australian New Zealand Army Corp) into Gallipoli to be slaughtered?
(: good list though
Wowee, I should just rule the world… Mwuahahahaha!!!
My Grandfather served under Mark Clark in Italy in 1943/44. He was the worst general in WWII
I've read quite a bit about Clark, and history, at least, has judged him more than competent. He took over in Korean War after MacArthur was sacked, and he did a creditable job there.
Nice to know the ‘lesser’ side of history once in a while.
Interesting list, KGB99.
I only knew about 4 of these. Pavel Grachev was an idiot and an embarrassment. Glad he made the list.
@tripsyman (19): Agree. He should have been a (dis)honorable mention.
I rather enjoyed this list. It was like a “Military Commanders That Did Good Once And Were Given a Chance But Blew It Epically” list.
Very nice. I was glad to see Santa Anna, here; when we read about him in school, I always thought “Oh.. idiot. Why was he the commander??”
Stefan – i think it was Churchill in charge of the Gallipoli initiative, if not the campaign itself. He lost his job as first lord of the admiralty, i think, and his reputation suffered.
It would seem a bit funny to have him on this list, though
In fact, his idea to attack at Gallipoli, which went so badly wrong, was in effect the same idea that went so well in world war two – attacking the ‘soft underbelly’ (italy in ww2)
Italy in WWII was a wasted campaign. I think Churchill wanted to attack Italy just so he could use the "soft underbelly" line. And Italy was anything but soft.
@tripsyman (18): @oouchan (26): Custer is indeed a notable mention on this list, and rightfully so. However, I didn’t put him in the Top 10 because he was in fact very successful in the Civil War.
Sir Douglas Haig from the battle of the Somme? Really expecting him here.
“Although the British were successful in their objective, Haig was given the name ‘Butcher of the Somme’, as it was and still is believed that he was at fault with all the lives lost during the battle. Haig was given this name as he never changed his tactics throughout the battle, causing thousands of soldiers’ deaths.”
Darius III is the most wortless King ever. The first to flee in battle.??? What a weak King. But Persians was one of the most largest and succesful empires ever.
Captain Fetterman, responsible for one of the the worst indian massacres of Army troops ever…
source: http://www.essortment.com/all/fettermanmassa_rfkt.htm
Well, you could put Bush the Son on the list, but I don’t know why. We defeated the Taliban and Saddam’s regime in Iraq, killed both of his sons, and then captured Hussein and then handed him over to Iraq’s new government. Those are all victories.
Antetam wasn’t the bloodiest battle of the Civil War, Ghettysburg was.
@KGB99 (29): I missed that. His first name threw me off.
Nice history lesson today
Thanks KGB
Here’s another possibility: CSA Gen. Braxton Bragg.
1) He blundered into a major fight at Perryville, Ky., in October 1862 and escaped from being annihilated only because one Federal corps did not engage. Bragg retreated to Murphreesburo, Tenn., where:
2) He crushed the right wing of the Union’s Army of the Cumberland on the first day of Stone’s River (Dec. 31, 1862), but was greatly surprised the next day when the Yanks were still there. After a futile assault rivaling Pickett’s charge on Jan. 2, he abandoned central Tennessee to the Yankees. Coming across a rebel straggler, he asked the soldier if he belonged to Bragg’s Army. Not recognizing the commander of the Army of Tennessee, the man cried, “Bragg’s army? Bragg’s got no army. He shot half of them himself, up in Kentucky, and the other half got killed at Murfreesboro!”
3) In June, Gen. Rosecrans skillfully maneuvered him out of Tennessee in the nearly bloodless Tullahoma campaign, which closed central and western Tennessee off from the Confederacy for good.
4) In August, Rosecrans maneuvered Bragg out of Chattanooga. Bragg then botched several attempts to destroy isolated parts of Rosecrans’ army. Unexpectedly reinforced by Longstreet’s veterans from the Army of Northern Virginia, they fought the terrible battle of Chickamauga on Sept. 19-20 (the second bloodiest battle of the war). Longstreet’s veterans smashed the Federal right and literally drove it from the field. Rosecrans, except for Thomas’ corps, retreated to Chattanooga. Bragg had won the Confederacy’s only real, clear-cut victory in the West, but instead of following Rosecrans to Chattanooga, he almost leisurely marched to the city and lay siege.
5) Confederate generals tried to get rid of Bragg, but Jeff Davis stuck by him. Nathan Bedford Forrest even told Bragg point blank that if he interfered with his command again, Forrest would shoot him. In November, Bragg was soundly whipped by Grant and the Army of the Cumberland, eager to erase the defeat of Chickamauga. Jeff Davis finally sacked Bragg for good and replaced him with Joe Johnston.
After Bragg’s tepid follow-up to the smashing Chickamauga victory, an observer asked, “What does he fight battles for?” That about sums up Bragg. Kind of amazing that a U.S. Army base is named after him.
Great info, STLMo. Although in retrospect I have heard of Ft. Bragg, I hadn't realized we had any bases named after Confederates.
Erm…someone should delete my previous comment.
And after that, this one as well. o.O
Likin’ the military list. Glad to see a civil war officer on there; I know they didn’t have the best of skills compared to the south. Also like the notes at the bottom
good list
I was glad to see an honorable mention of Burnside. I live by Sharpsburg (Antietam) and it is plain to see that sending mass amounts of men across that bridge with a hill on the other side full of CSA soldiers was nuts! Great List
Don’t forget Burnside’s Utter failure at the battle of Fredrickburg!!
A few more wrinkles on the brain today.. Nice List!
U forgot one……BUSH!!!!!!!
We lost so many of boys over there due to the stupidity of that kid we called a president
Hi. A surprisingly slow day for such a well thought out list; featuring commanders from all over the world. But take heart KGB, the fact that there are only a few comments ‘could’ suggest that folks have nothing to complain about it
I suspect there are five notable mentions because this was originaly a top 15?
Strategy is a wild card when it comes to war, and victory can be as much about tactics as it is about the weather, the terrain, and even plain dumb bad luck!
I remember reading about the battle of Culloden; when Charles Edward Stuart was seen as the dumbest commander for basically failing to issue orders during the battle. However, the night before the battle, Stuart had organised a secret raid on the enemy (English) camp, in which his entire army marched in the dead of night across the marshy moors. The effort could have meant early victory, but by the time his army was within reach of King George IIs men, the sun had come up and all his men were exhaused. The unit then split up – some went back to the stronghold of Inverness, some found the Inverness road and went the WRONG way, some sneaked home, and the rest turned to fight as the well rested English formed to make a stand. Even during the battle, driving rain and sleet blew from the north-east into the faces of the exhausted Stuart Jacobite army. Not surprisingly after days of sleep deprevation, the battle was a wash-out defeat, and Charles Stuart fled for France….
Do leaders always flee from battles? I suspect most actually do, perhaps to fight another day.
Adolf Hitler; While not technically a field general, he was the surpreme commander of the German armed forces.
The initial victories were sparked by element of surprise and new militairy strategies and tactics. When he tried to control every single move made by the generals, it went downhill. For example, when general Heinz Guderian wished to withdraw his troops during the battle of Moscow, he was turned down and suffered great losses.
It is said that the allies were planning to assassinate Hitler, but decided not to; he was better at losing the war than anyone else.
i was hoping the entente/central commanders from the first world war were at a joint place.
really, sending wave after wave of foot soldiers at fortified locations… to quote a bit from the first episode of blackadder goes forth (which sums up the general tactics of this war):
captain blackadder: does this plan involve taking our guns, leaving the trenches and moving slowly towards the battlefield?
general Melchett: blasted, blackadder, how could you know?
captain Blackadder: because this is precisely the same think we done last time… and the 17 times before.
general Melchett: well, that is exactly the smart thing of this plan! the germans will never expect us to do something that has failed 18 times before.
this quote may be not exactly the same, but it sums it up quite well. in WWI, most battles were like this. they would make like 10 feet progress, and then fall back into the general impasse they were in before.
In my opinion, American Revolution General Horatio Gates should be on this list. While he took credit for the victory at Saratoga, most historians agree that his hesitance to act almost cost the colonists a victory. This victory was only achieved by a daring assault led by Benedict Arnold (pre-treason). After falsely taking credit (and failing to properly credit Arnold – thus starting the chain that led to his treason) Gates was placed in command of the army of the south. His first move was to place the American troops into a poorly defensible position near Camden, SC. This, coupled with his poor choice of tactics (he thought there was no use for cavalry) led to a British rout at the battle of Camden. General Gates was last seen fleeing the field – outrunning the majority of his own troops in the process.
Like the list. I’m surprised the comments are so slow. Anyways, nice list and I would enjoy more of these well thought out list in the future…or like it was a few months ago. Seems to me like the lists are getting less detailed and more boring/uninteresting.
Poor Custer couldn’t even cut it here…
Good list, StlMo. I believe that Westmorland’s actions are what contributed to such a high number of casualties in Vietnam. Besides underestimating the enemy but such great numbers, he also allocated troops poorly. He was also looking at each battle as a war unto itself, and did not look at the big picture.
That said, we should have learned fro the French, and stayed the hell out of the conflict to begin with.
I know this has nothing to do with the list but i visit listverse everyday using the wlan on my mobile phone and something called st automatically downloads itself to my phone and not once but many times as st(1), st(2), etc. This only happens when i visit listverse so im hoping you will check it out because it is very annoying to stop reading and delete them again and again.
Some WWI guys for your list:
http://www.firstworldwar.com/bio/nivelle.htm
http://www.firstworldwar.com/bio/cadorna.htm
http://www.firstworldwar.com/bio/nicholasii.htm
Good list! Honourable mention as I’m sure others will have said – Douglas Haig.
Thank God for Grachev! A better soldier would no doubt have done a better job of slaughtering Chechans for daring to leave Russia’s post-USSR fold.
Free Chechnya.
The elementary school in Hadley, Massachusetts (where Hooker was born) used to be called Hooker School…it made us laugh when we found out what a ‘hooker’ actually was.
redcaboose – I think you mean KGB99. I didn’t write this list.
You are right StlMo, I was not paying attention to what was right in front of my face.
Hey, thought I would mention the Battle of Arausio in 105 B.C. which was between 12 Roman legions and auxiliaries numbering about 120,000 and 200,000 Gaul’s. The Gauls suffered about 15,000 casualties but the Romans, under the command of Quintus Servilius Caepio, and Gnaeus Mallius Maximus lost every single soldier they fielded. The loss was atributed to the two Roman generals refusing to work wiht one another.
It’s worth mentioning that McLellan was reinstated after Burnside failed so badly. He had two chances and still failed to defeat Lee’s army. As for the Antietam vs Gettysburg comment, Antietam had the greatest single day casualties (23,000 killed, wounded, missing). Gettysburg was fought over three days and resulted in an estimated 51,000 casualties.
this list is good cause most of them never had a true success and were epic failures unlike some of the people that others are suggesting. mark clark in ww2 was successful and talented not the worst ww2 general by absolute miles. douglas haig was limited to sending waves of troops due to trench warfare. what else could he have done- the tech needed wasnt available and sanata annas army was terrible not really his fault as there were no mexican victories in the US-mexican war either.