With the current political crisis in Honduras, American (US) foreign policy is looking to soften its historic reputation in the region by largely deferring negotiations to Latin American diplomats. While the Honduran economy relies heavily on remittances sent from the U.S., many are wary of American involvement at the state level. To help explain why, here is a list of ten previous instances of American involvement in Latin America.
Note: This is NOT an endorsement of radical governments that have taken hold in some parts of Latin America whose adherence to democracy is often questionable, but rather a balanced historic perspective to explain anti-U.S. sentiment in the region.
This addition to the Army Appropriations Act, submitted by Senator Orville Pratt (R-Ohio), set the stage for US-Cuban relations in the early 20th Century. Following the war with Spain in 1898, the US maintained a large garrison in Cuba in the interest of creating a self-governing colony subordinate to Washington. The terms of the amendment included 1) restriction of land leasing to any nation but the US, 2) ensuring of US intervention in Cuban affairs and 3) prohibition of negotiating treaties with any power other than the US The amendment also provided the framework for the leasing of Guantanamo Bay to US control, which became an even more divisive issue upon transfer of detainees to the area following the September 11 attacks and subsequent wars.
Panama was once a part of Colombia (which was itself part of a country called Great Colombia following independence from Spain). The Colombian government had negotiated with the US to build a canal to bridge the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, but it fell through. A separatist movement in Panama ensued, which the US supported. Following the establishment of the Republic of Panama, French engineering magnate Philip Burnau-Varilla sold his concession to the building rights for the canal to the US government. The US also demanded control of the canal and the six-mile zone around it. The tension culminated in the 1964 riots that killed 22 Panamanians and 4 US soldiers. Control of the Canal was transferred back to Panama in 1999.
Wanting to protect his Panamanian investment, US President Teddy Roosevelt announced his corollary to the previous Monroe Doctrine, stating that the US could act unilaterally to ward off European intervention in the Caribbean. He obtained the rights to administer Dominican customs its chief source of income. Later, in 1916, the US invaded and established a military government under Admiral Knapp, which was repudiated by Dominicans and was often brutal in its crackdown on dissent. The US occupation would not end until 1922. The US also supported dictator Rafael Trujillo (pictured above) despite his campaign of political assassinations and massacres of Haitians. The Dominican Republic was considered a protectorate of the US until 1941.
The US Marines were sent to occupy Nicaragua beginning in 1912 in the midst of an armed insurrection. The US was also granted rights to build a so-called “Nicaragua Canal” by the conservative US-backed Chamorro ruling family. Later, Gen. Augusto Sandino led a rebellion against the conservative government and US occupation. Sandino was later assassinated, and the military dictatorship of the Somoza family came into power. This too was backed by the US-trained Guardia Nacional.
Following guerilla leader Pancho Villa’s raid on Columbus, New Mexico (in which 16 Americans died), President Wilson sent Gen. “Blackjack” Pershing and 10,000 soldiers into the mountains of northern Mexico to hunt Villa down. The mission ultimately failed but Mexicans viewed the act as an unjust invasion. It is said that the pejorative designation “gringo” came from this time, as US soldiers clad in olive uniforms were met with cries of “Green, Go!”
Wary of German influence in Haiti, American investors backed by the US State Department aquired the National Bank of Haiti. In a subsequent revolt against the US-friendly regime of Jean Vilbrun Guillaume Sam, the Marines were sent to occupy Port-au-Prince in 1915. The US government would administer the island for the next two decades. The US wielded veto power over all government decisions in Haiti, and Marine Corps officers served as regional administrators. The US military eventually withdrew, but 50 years of American-backed military dictatorships followed.
In the early 1950s, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) organized a coup against democratically-elected President Arbenz in Guatemala. Arbenz had instituted sweeping land reforms to benefit the country’s vast impoverished populace. This antagonized the powerful United Fruit Company, a multi-national conglomerate (of which CIA director Allen Dulles was a stockholer) that lobbied the US government for intervention. The moves were also deemed communist in nature by the Eisenhower administration and the US government began to supply anti-Arbenz forces with weapons and training. Arbenz was overthrown, and military dictatorship followed for the next four decades. During this time, it is estimated that nearly a quarter million Guatemalans were killed or “disappeared.”
US President Eisenhower oversaw plans to depose Communist Cuban leader Fidel Castro as early as 1960, using much the same model as the one used in Guatemala. Castro had deposed the US-backed Batista regime in the Revolution, and had since developed close ties with the Soviet Union. The plans came to fruition under the Kennedy administration. A force of anti-Castro Cuban exiles were landed in southern Cuba on April 17, 1961, supported by strikes on Cuban airfields. By this time, however, Castro’s forces were well equipped with advanced Soviet weapons and the invasion was defeated. Tensions between the US and Cuba would be strained to a breaking point with the Cuban Missile Crisis the following year.
Though there is controversy surrounding the 1973 Chilean coup even today, there is certainly evidence of communication between the CIA and the coup instigators led by Gen. Augusto Pinochet. Salvador Allende was a democratically-elected president with ties to Cuba’s Fidel Castro. In September 1973, he was overthrown by a military junta. The CIA was aware of the coup as many as two days in advance. Following the event, in a conference with President Nixon, National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger stated that “the Chilean thing is getting consolidated and of course the newspapers are bleeding because a pro-Communist government has been overthrown.” Pinochet’s regime went on to become one of the most oppressive and brutal organizations of the 20th Century.
Grenada is a small Caribbean island about 100 miles north of Venezuela. In 1979, a revolution led by Maurice Bishop came to power with Cuban support. Among his projects was the construction of a large airstrip, which was charged by US President Reagan as designed for Soviet aircraft. An internal power struggle followed, ending in Bishop’s arrest and execution. At the time, 800 US medical students were on the island, and their presence amid the turmoil gave Reagan sufficient justification for ordering an invasion. Ten thousand US, Jamaican and Caribbean troops landed on Oct. 25, 1983. The invasion was condemned internationally by the UN General Assembly. Twenty American troops were killed, along with over a hundred Cuban and Grenadan soldiers and civilians.






























hey
Wh0a! I never knew th0se..
just like americans, sticking there noses where they don’t belong
Hoo boy, Islam bashing followed by America bashing. Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war.
Is there any other country in the world that has a record of intervention like this? And this is only in one part of the world.
The invasion of Grenada was a classic case of the big boy flexing his muscles to show the little guy who is the boss. Grenada was an excuse to give Cuba (the little guy) a bloody nose. The american students provided the excuse and Reagan got to show who was boss. I’m not anti american just saying it as it happened. I agree it should be number 1 on the list.
@brandiwine number 1&2 – congrats on being first to post – your comments (especially 1) were very constructive and well thought out!
Not much compared to previous list
@astraya (5): I suspect Britain has had it’s fair share of similar activities
Said the New Zealander to the Australian! Evil colonisers, obviously, those Brits.
Yup, lets do a British one.
Ha! Yes Minister was lurking at the back of my mind:
“Sir Humphrey: Minister, Britain has had the same foreign policy objective for at least the last five hundred years: to create a disunited Europe. In that cause we have fought with the Dutch against the Spanish, with the Germans against the French, with the French and Italians against the Germans, and with the French against the Germans and Italians. Divide and rule, you see. Why should we change now, when it’s worked so well?
Hacker: That’s all ancient history, surely?
Sir Humphrey: Yes, and current policy. We had to break the whole thing [the EEC] up, so we had to get inside. We tried to break it up from the outside, but that wouldn’t work. Now that we’re inside we can make a complete pig’s breakfast of the whole thing: set the Germans against the French, the French against the Italians, the Italians against the Dutch. The Foreign Office is terribly pleased; it’s just like old times.”
Do you have a flag?
I really wish listverse would drop this current political theme it has adopted.
You need to understand that every story of two sides and insisting on only telling the other guy’s side of the story is even more stupid than just telling your side of the story, because it’s the story that you don’t really know very well.
The only thing more stupid than that is looking at a story where you don’t even have a side, choosing a side and only telling yourself that side of that story.
Sadly it would seem too many people on listverse are guilty of one of the three.
It is interesting to see bits and pieces of American foreign policy being exercised through legal, quasi-legal, illegal and immoral activities over ~70 years. Also important is to note the creation of ever more brutal regimes in the power vacuum that follows a “deposed” government.
Every nation has a tendency to exert influence and control over its neighbours (or other far flung nations). It’s just human nature. The concern among people is that just like the Colonial Powers before it (England and the British East India Company comes to mind), America is following the same course in a systematic and widespread manner to protect government/corporate interests.
We can see parallels with China’s activities with respect to control of resources in Indochina and Africa today (more recently with Australia).
I could go on with other examples from modern or pre-modern times but why bother. As a pessimist and nihilist, I find all of this quite entertaining.
Really great list, this kind of history is hardly talked about in American schools. Happy to inform myself
I would love to know how much of this is covered in the history curriculum in U.S. schools. The double standards the country holds is ridiculous. Ridding Saddam of his tyrannical regime to liberate people of Iraq and installing a fascist dictator at the cost of a democratically elected president because he didn’t serve the great U.S.A’s interests. Former CIA agents also openly admit their involvement in the coup in Chile.
For anyone interested in this topic I would recommend watching “The War on Democracy” by John Pilger. Very informative documentary.
Here is the link:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3739500579629840148
Hey all. ‘A river flows through Guantanamo’; that would make a great title of a book wouldn’t it? The flow of power has seen many nations lapping against foreign shores; sometimes for a whole host of reasons, but generally to gain more ecconomic power. Who can say if the Americans are – or were – any more ruthless than the Romans, the Turks, the Mongols, the Portugese, the Spanish, the British or the Russians in their conquests? And yes, it is still going on today; by many nations (overtly and covertly), often in the name of one thing whilst trying to achieve another. These days, there also seems to be an added pressure from corporate leaders and high financiers whom may promote a more global agenda; and whilst power stuggles are still going on, the climate has shifted away from land and property towards something much more fundamental.
As far as the list goes, it would be too easy to blame the U.S. and their previous foreign policies; instead I see raids and skirmishes which presumably seemed very good ideas at the time, turn into very poor ideas in the end.
number 4 is the most disgusting. they started a war and a regime change to boost the profits of big business. lol thats basically a real life incident that mirrors all the claims of films,tv and people like micheal moore.
america shot itself in the foot there as now everywar they enter is seen as business related (ie iraq oil?)
To put things in perspective, the US has invaded Haiti at least three times, Panama at least twice, and has supported militarily and economically violent dictatorships in Chile, Dominica, Bolivia, Nicaragua and Argentina.
Interesting list. I studied a bit of this during school and on my own. I remember studing mostly about the Panama C*****. Only because my brother was in the USMC and had been stationed there for a bit.
I find the picture for number 3 to be the most amazing I have seen. Quite clear and graphic for such an old photograph.
Hacing recently completed a political science course concerning the US and Latin America, I have to point out to the “you’re just bashing America” commenters: It is true and it was largely a case of “We’re bigger and better than you” before FDR and “Eliminate the commies!” After FDR. FDR did try and implement the good neighbor policy and normalize relations with Latin America, but so-called “red” influence afterwards meant we were only concerned with having non-liberal regimes. US actions in LA were governed heavily by the “he may be a bastard, but he’s OUR bastard” principle.
The history is incredibly diverse, interesting and often depressing, but it’s good to know the actions that have been taken and the resulting like or dislike towards US government and people.
Quite interesting list, if not only for the origins of the word “gringo”. You could have expanded #7 to include the Contra support during the 80s.
But this just goes to show that the difference between a “ruthless tyrant” and a “benevolent dictator”, as well as between a “terrorist” and a “freedom fighter” sadly just depends on the political context, not actions.
Big Brother is watching you!
There’s a political crisis in Honduras?
Americans think they control the world.
Do not disagree unless your a blind ignorant fool.
@ 2009(26)- I’m an American and I don’t control the world. You should check your spelling before you call others ignorant fools. It’s you’re.. not your.
@deepthinker (27): I never thought it was an english exam.
You are an american, cool.You better learn how to speak mandarin soon, boy.
@deepthinker (27):
So you are denying my claim?
America doesnt invade whatever they want?
That constituation must make a good antique cos thats all it is now.
Im an american and hell yeah the world is ours:D
why do you think the whole world speaks the american language?
USA!
@Dropkick2000 (30): Just dumb beyone belief.I wonder if the Chinese will have mercy on you civilians……….hmmmm.
lol we all know the answer.
Do not read or review the following…:
@2009 (26): Yes, just as an asside from the list for a moment, I have to say the level of internet and telecommunications surveillance has become an issue many global governments are determined to win. There have been many agendas put forward to stop blogs (such as this one) and to enable the prosecution of ‘vocal descentors’ on the internet. Sad times indeed. There are also many buzz words constantly being monitored in the name of national security; which include words like b;o’m;b, t;e’r:r;o;r, h;i;j.a;c;k, c;o;n:s;p;i;r.a;c;y, drug words (such as ;c;r.a;c;k;, s:m,a;c;k), organised crime words (such as a;s;s~a;u;l;t, c;a;b;a.l and c;a;r;t:e;l.l;), cult words, naming public descentors (such as d;a,v;i;d i;c:k;e and a:l;e;x j;o:n’e;s,) and talking about covert black ops (such as c;a’m.p; f;e~m;a>, and ;f:o;r’t ‘*d;e;t;r’i;c;k).
[In this digital age, it is so easy to i.n:t;e;r'c;e'p;t messages whizzing around the globe at light speed, to make copies, and also to divert messages, or to stop them from ever reaching their destination. Digital is the new baby they hope will grow into a self policing media which could 'report' the users activities].
Of course, I made all this up – it’s a joke – don’t believe it – it’s a lie, all of it.
I can feel the AP US HIstory remanents trying to return to my head…
By saying America is a pig, America love satan, America stick their nose where it does not belong, and America is just trying to stomp on the little guy, you are making a general claim. These are our stupid politicians who committed these criminal acts not American citizen who really makes up America. These politicians try to hide or sugar coat these acts in order to please the American people. Our political system is retarded, allowing very little room for the middle man in the political spectrum and power to minority voters. These politician deceive us with empty promises and false words to get elected. For example: Nixon was elected on the promise for ending the Vietnam war, instead, he further escalated it. Not every American believe in the popular opinion. I hate George Bush. Americans choose Al Gore. Bush and his brother fixed the election by using loopholes in the Florida court systems. Also the votes were split between Nader and Gore (yes 1.2% makes the difference).
@HAL9000 (13): No flag, no country, can’t have one!
JFrater, how about a positive American list, hmm?
Although I agree the US has its flaws, I think it’s gotten the short side of the stick on this site.
@ImElvis666 (17): Unfortunately, in America, unless you voluntarily take an AP History in high school or major in history in college, these things are not taught in traditional American history classes in middle school and high school. They do teach ‘the history of the victor’ in our schools. Usually it takes one own personal curiosity about history to seek out another source instead of it being part of a curriculum. Usually sometime in college people will come across Howard Zinn’s ‘A People’s History of the United States’ and then everything is put into perspective. This is the book that should be used in our schools.
As an American, I apologize to the rest of the world. To quote Radiohead, (even though they are referring to Britain is this song)…
‘bring down the government, they don’t speak for us.’
Our government truly does not speak for us. It is run by the rich elite that are only interested in remaining the rich elite. The collapse of the economy and its subsequent handling of it should be proof positive that us citizens of America, and the rest of the world, are not being looked after by our governments.
All this contempt for the evil Americans and the evil Brits. . . Errr . . . who exactly are the good guys?
As I said, I’m American. Our political system was set up to function in a world of limited communications and where education was at a minimum. Towns, cities, districts, states, etc. all needed representation in this type of world as it was impossible for every person to get all the information being discussed by government as possibly being implemented into law. And even if people got this information, education isn’t what it is today and a lot of people would likely not understand it. Today its different. With instant communication and access to the wealth of information on the internet, we don’t need all these politicians all the way down to the town level making decisions for us. Things similar to props in California can be implemented country-wide. These are essentially votes that go around the politicians where citizens directly vote on a measure to decide its validity. This is how ***** is virtually legal in California. I guarantee you if there was a prop vote for whether to invade Iraq or not, we wouldn’t be in the situation we are in right now.
They don’t speak for us. Please understand this, world. We are currently at the mercy of the system.
THERE IS NO SURVEILLANCE OF ELECTRONIC MESSAGES OCCURRING WITHIN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
PLEASE CONTINUE YOUR SEDITIOUS CHATTER
THAT IS ALL
THANK YOU
Well, that was interesting. Oh, and hey, don’t even bash the British up there ^ just because your country was inhabited by cockney prostitutes, rapists and murderers, does not make it every Brits’ fault…
Could somebody create a more ‘pop culture’ list? Y’know like movies and music and stuff…
Only knew 4 of them interesting list
I see the debates are hotting up again.
I wrote this list. As I stated in the introduction, this is just a presentation of facts. I’m an American and I don’t understand why we’re so thin-skinned. This is history, people. Nothing more.
the etymology of gringo is a myth. The word was in Spanish use in Europe back in the early 1800s.
@Lifeschool (32): Nice, well in that case. I am a clinically insane terrorist that detests the america govt, i wish to assasinate the president and all other members of the G20 summit.
ill send you a post card from G. Bay
@Chineapplepunk (42): LMAO.
I hear ya lol
@Gringo Joe (44): Yes, I was (and am currently) going to thank you for the list and trying to present things in a way that insights further investigation rather than general list critisism. These things happened; it’s history.
@CARNIVORE HAX0R BOT 2.0 (41): Very funny! (sc.)
Yes, the US has had a hand in a lot of the political and military operations in South and Central America. We should leave these countries alone to fight their battles and to grow up on their own.
We should also keep the billions of dollars that we throw at them year after year.
Excellent list – I find it horrifying that American’s aren’t taught this stuff as part of their curriculum. I learned about it in Grade 9 History/Geography. Maybe it was during the spiel on Manifest Destiny….best to know the devil you bed with.
redcaboose: Maybe those billions are guilt payments eh? Not sufficient pay-back imo.
Gringos think they are the center of the world.
By the way, American is a person who was born in a continent called America, not just a country that is part of it.
OK u guys know what? I think listverse is gonna be trashed soon I mean yesterday they slammed Muslims now USA. What the F***????
Quite right, Ulises. Plenty of ethnocentrism to go around. A previous comment was made about Howard Zinn’s “People’s History.” This, along with other texts such as Galeano’s “Open Veins of Latin America” have been criticized as inordinately revisionist. I’ll leave that judgement to you, but I highly recommend checking it out.
Here are some other readings that may give you a new perspective on Latin American studies. Granted, some are rather biased but so are most American history textbooks:
-”Modern Latin America” by Skidmore and Smith
-”The Labyrinth of Solitude” by Paz
-”The Buried Mirror” by Fuentes
-”Latin America: From Colonization to Globalization” by -Chomsky
-”Our America” by Marti
-”Essays of Authoritarianism and Democratization” but O’Donnell
@redcaboose – Those “billions” aren’t really all that much. Why do you think we do business down there; because it is cheaper! We make way way more money then we actually put in to their economies. Also any money we do give them goes to the brutal dictators that we established, not to the people that need it; the people that are starving and living in poverty.
Thank you for this list, people need to see how greatly the US abuses its power in Central and South America. As with number 4 the majority of these “interventions” were about big business, not this so called threat of communism. The US doesn’t care about the ideology of who is the leader, they just care about whether or not whoever in charge is pro-US and allow them to do whatever they want there. The US has helped establish some of the most brutal dictators in this hemisphere.
After knowing these facts you expect us to believe that the war in Iraq was just about overthrowing a cruel dictator, yeah right.
If anyone wishes to read more about these awful tragedies check out Noam Chomsky, Understanding Power. It is a very insightful and though provoking look at US foreign policy.
Peace and Love to all
oouchan @ 54 – What happened to your logo ?
@undaunted warrior (55): As Thomas Magnum might say: “When I write my book on how to be a world-class private investigator, rule number 34 would have to be: if something looks out of place, the chances are you’re probably right – it is.”
@ undaunted warrior: That’s because it’s a nickname stealing troll. I reported it to Jaime.
@ Lifeschool (56)
@ oouchan (57)
Been on the site for a long time now, had to change my user name when we joined the new site.
You get to know the writing style, etc. etc. of most of the regulars, so if you read the comments carefully it is not all that hard to spot a troll.
Thanks for the reply both of you.
Interesting how there is a troll here that is spewing antiamericanism and promoting Chinese.
Right now I am in China. Behind the ‘great firewall’. Listverse is blocked/banned in China. No reason, no explanation. I am accessing through a proxy based in the Netherlands.
Those talking about the Chilean coup need to realize that, while there was CIA involvement, it wasn’t caused by the CIA. To blame it on America is kinda like blaming starvation in Africa on America. America doesn’t do anything about it, so it’s America’s fault.
Liberals and Antiamericans on this site tend to see American interventionism as terrible and also see non intervention as terrible.
As for occupying other countries. other nations, including China has a far worse history. While the US occupies Iraq, few informed individuals think it will be permanent or become a permanent part of the US. The US is not importing millions of its citizens to Iraq to give itself a majority.
Compare that to the actions of China upon a small helpless mountainous country to it’s west. The citizens of that country are rapidly becomming a minority in their own towns. Keep in mind i can’t say certain words or I will create trouble for myself. You have to fill in the blanks.
Chinese often think the CIA is responsible for most of the world’s troubles. The recently bombing in the Western part of this country is blamed by the people on the CIA. While the CIA tends to have an agent or two in every country, and therefore is generally there when bad things happen, it’s not responsible for everything. China has 10x more people monitoring the internet alone than the CIA has employees and agents.
I am not defending the US to the death. Several of the events are truly terrible. But perspective is needed. No other country would have given the c***** to panama, witht hte possible exception of Britain. China would have settled panama and made it a province.
@undaunted warrior (58):
, oh, and just one more thing before I fork off (!): if you click on the name of a commenter, wordpress will automatically take you to the comments box with a handy link back to their comment. Nice n easy. C U Gyz anon.
I enjoyed reading this list. Thanks Joe. Noam Chomsky would be proud of you.