Top 10 Scientific Achievements We Are Waiting For
- Published December 29, 2009 by Thempler - 229 Comments
Science has grown exponentially over the past few centuries, making things possible that were once absolutely considered completely impossible. Science has done a lot to cure many of our worldly troubles, but one thing about science is that it isn’t perfect, and never will be. The reason for this is that science is always getting better. There is always more to discover. These are the top ten scientific accomplishments that haven’t been achieved… yet.
Imagine having an iPod capable of holding thousands of years of high definition video. A DNA computer would make such a device very possible. DNA is the substance that living organisms use to store genetic information. What makes DNA special is that it is extremely efficient when it comes to storing information in a limited space. Just one milligram of DNA is capable of holding all the printed material in the world. DNA computing is currently in its infancy, with prototypes such as MAYA-II only capable of showing the concept. If DNA computing is perfected, computers will become capable of holding amounts of information that are hard to imagine by today’s standard.
Ever since space colonization was first imagined, it was thought that the Moon would be first object to be colonized since it was closest to Earth. In 1969, when man first walked on the moon, a permanent colony suddenly appeared to be very achievable. However, for a variety of reasons, both economical and technical, the project was never truly attempted. However, NASA currently has plans to have one constructed by 2024. The ESA also has plans to construct a moon base by 2025. Japan and India also each have plans to have a base by 2030. The biggest barrier to a base is money. Many people within NASA, including Buzz Aldrin, have criticized the building of a moon base, saying that NASA should put more focus on different projects, like item number five.
This bizarre surgery is bound to cause controversy in the near future. In a head transplant, the patient is decapitated, and the patient’s head is attached to a donor’s body so that blood circulates between the head and body. A head transplant would theoretically cure absolutely any disease that did not directly affect the head. However, unless a means of repairing the spinal cord is developed, the patient would be quadriplegic. Head transplants have been done with limited success on mice, dogs, and monkeys. The biggest problem of doing a head transplant is that it raises all sorts of ethical questions. For instance, if organ donors were in short supply, a head transplant would be considered wasteful as a donor’s body would only help one person. A greater fear is that if head transplants were combined with cloning, then people might murder their own clones to double their life spans.
While many alternatives to fossil fuels have been investigated, there is still quite a way to go before mankind’s energy supply is completely renewable. As of today, about 85% of all energy comes from fossil fuels. The reason clean energy is considered to be important is because fossil fuels aren’t expected to last much longer, they pollute the environment, and they have led to tensions between nations. The reason clean energy is hard to come by is that we’ve spent the past 150 years dependent on oil, and it’s quite difficult to make the switch. Some have even suggested that the technology for producing vast amounts of clean energy already exists but is being suppressed by big oil companies. However, several European countries have produced considerable amounts of clean energy. Current methods of clean energy include wind, solar, geothermal, tidal, hydropower, nuclear, biofuel, and several others.
Cancer is one of the deadliest diseases of the modern era. Ever since the days of Hippocrates people have been searching for a cure. Cancer is similar to the common cold in that although there are many ways to treat it, modern medicine is still yet to come up with a cure. This is partially because like the common cold, there are many different types of cancer, and they are all slightly different. Unfortunately, with over seven million deaths per year, cancer is much more serious than the common cold. A wide assortment of drugs, chemicals, stem cells, genetically modified viruses, and even arsenic have all been proposed as cancer cures. However, number two on this list has quite a bit of promise.
Putting men on Mars has been an idea in science fiction for quite a while. However, when man first walked on the Moon, walking on Mars suddenly seemed feasible. A manned mission to Mars would be a huge milestone in space exploration. It would allow a more in-depth study of the Red Planet, and many have argued that building a permanent base on Mars is much more practical than building one on the Moon. A mission to Mars would be similar to the Moon landings, but much more difficult. The trip is about a hundred times longer, and there are new problems such as the Martian weather which must be considered. NASA currently has plans to have a man on Mars sometime in the 2030s, while the ESA plans to do so also around the same time frame. Russia has plans to launch a manned Mars mission by 2020.
A space elevator would be thousands of times taller than the current tallest building. However, building this structure is actually much easier than it sounds. This is because the center of mass of the structure is actually in orbit. While plans for a space elevator differ slightly, they usually involve a space station being put into or above geostationary orbit, running a tether between the station and the ground, and having elevator cars carry people and cargo between Earth and the station. A space elevator would make space travel much easier, cheaper, and safer. If such a structure is to be constructed efficiently, then a very strong material made from carbon nanotubes will have to be made in large quantities. There are also other problems with building a space elevator. Despite this, LiftPort Group, a private corporation, plans to have one built by 2031.
For thousands of years, it has been speculated that all the events in the universe are actually the result of a single force. For centuries, physicists have sought to unify the known forces. Currently there are four fundamental forces: electromagnetic, weak nuclear, strong nuclear, and gravity. While the Electroweak Theory has unified weak nuclear and electromagnetic, the Theory of Everything would require that all four be unified. In order to prove such a theory, matter must be studied at extremely high energies. String Theory tries to explain the basics of nature, but a Theory of Everything would be much nicer. Such a theory would be the biggest breakthrough in physics since Einstein. The Theory of Everything gets its name from the fact that it ties together all physical phenomena. Despite its name, it wouldn’t be a complete understanding of physics, as there would still be more to discover.
Nanotechnology has the potential to revolutionize several fields, but its greatest contribution may very well be in medicine. The applications of nanotechnology in medicine are literally endless. Molecules could be built to stick to and destroy cancer cells, and only cancer cells. Advanced drug delivery techniques could be used to deliver drugs to specific parts of the body and eliminate side effects. Microscopic robots could be used to perform ultra delicate surgeries, to repair damaged tissues, or to hunt down and destroy certain cells, like cancer cells or bacteria. Nanomedicine is currently in its infancy, but it may prove to be the biggest breakthrough in modern medicine since the first vaccine.
In the 19th century, it was generally thought that man would reach the center of the Earth long before he reached the Moon. This shows just how unpredictable technology can be. A journey to the center of the Earth is actually much more difficult than it sounds. The pressure at the center of the Earth is enormous because, quite literally, the entire weight of the world is on top of you. There is no known substance, not even carbon nanotubes, that can maintain its shape at such a great pressure. Currently the deepest man-made hole is less than 0.2% of what it would need to be. While the Earth’s deep interior may offer vast amounts of energy, it may be quite a while before we can tap into it directly.
![]() Top 10 Coolest Plants | ![]() Top 10 Myths About Dinosaurs | ![]() 15 Fastest Things In The Universe |
![]() Top 10 Bizarre Things in Space | ![]() Top 10 Unusual Cat Breeds | ![]() 10 Beasts That Used To Be Mythical |


























1 lala
December 29th, 2009 at 1:32 am
head transplant wins. nice list. how about time travel though?
2 dr_hax0r
December 29th, 2009 at 1:35 am
ridiculous list, the author quite evidently does not have a clue about science.
3 apepper
December 29th, 2009 at 1:35 am
Interesting list; I didn’t know the journey to the centre of the Earth was considered seriously – I’d read the book.
4 mike2222
December 29th, 2009 at 1:39 am
Ridiculous indeed.
5 Vera Lynn
December 29th, 2009 at 1:45 am
Some curious things here. Hmm.
6 Avi
December 29th, 2009 at 1:47 am
Honestly I feel like what is most important is Renewable and easily created Food Stuffs. Humanity needs food, and lots of it. That is what we are hoping and waiting for.
7 Grasshopperking
December 29th, 2009 at 1:47 am
hmm. Quite interesting shtuff. Some items were unexpected…haha…head transplants?
8 Nerothought
December 29th, 2009 at 1:48 am
I think the cure for cancer should be number 1. But I love these type of list. P.s. Space elevator would be awesome xD
9 defil3r
December 29th, 2009 at 1:50 am
BRILLIANT list
JUST BRILLIANT
shows what L,V can accomplish at its best
just wow
keep it up. very informative and intresting.
and also, who agrees that if Niklov Teslar hadnt ‘mysteriously’ died, we would have many of these inventions at the moment!!!!!
10 cryan
December 29th, 2009 at 1:51 am
@dr_hax0r (2): science is for tards. mission to earths core: 2019, bet you a dollar
11 black_hat
December 29th, 2009 at 1:52 am
lol, is this list a joke or what.
Quantum computer??
head transplant, you’ve got to be joking
so many flaws…
12 AuthorityFigure
December 29th, 2009 at 1:54 am
A “ToE” would provide the answers for the other nine items.
13 quantum_mechanic
December 29th, 2009 at 1:56 am
a ToE would provide the answers to all 10 of the items
14 defil3r
December 29th, 2009 at 1:57 am
@black_hat (12):
???
head transplnts arent impossible hypotheticly in the slightest
and also, whats so shocking about quantum computing?! its a certaninty to happen tbh
15 Wtf
December 29th, 2009 at 1:58 am
@ dr hax0r……..please explain. In your own words.
16 YoungAnabaptistRadical
December 29th, 2009 at 1:59 am
On Number 7 – “However, several European countries have produced considerable amounts of clean energy. Current methods of clean energy include wind, solar, geothermal, tidal, hydropower, nuclear, biofuel, and several others.” — therefore we aren’t waiting for it…
Lala – time travel was possible – until, that is, all of the Time Turners were destroyed during the Battle of the Department of Mysteries in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. Duh!
17 Kibey
December 29th, 2009 at 1:59 am
FLYING CAR! Gawd damit! I’m still waiting for my flying car!
18 defil3r
December 29th, 2009 at 2:00 am
@dr_hax0r (2):
well, this isnt science is it really
science = testable theory
these items = pseudo-sciences and idealistic possibilities
19 Skrillah
December 29th, 2009 at 2:08 am
One of the few lists that actually remained relevant to the title. Good job Thempler. About # 3, We ain’t going nowhere until we drop the pointless ( quite literary) ”Big bang” theory which is the ideology of the church disguised in science! Please read this article about the Big bang hoax to help raise awareness on this matter.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/bang.html
A good list! 7/10 in the Skrill-O-meter.
20 superbloop
December 29th, 2009 at 2:09 am
Nice list.
21 lalalakc
December 29th, 2009 at 2:15 am
really got me thinking…
22 dbrownl
December 29th, 2009 at 2:18 am
dumb list i think there is only one item on this list “we” are all waiting for and that is the cure for cancer, the rest are for money wasting dillwads, and who the f wants an elevator to space???
23 Rufus
December 29th, 2009 at 2:25 am
wouldn’t number one cause a megavolcano if not handled safely? the mantle and core is under great pressure and magma / lava would spurt out if a hole was big enough =P
and after the megavolcano, god knows how much lava would be out of the mantle, the mantle would be smaller and the crust would collapse, quite catastrophic eh?
not something i’d put in number 1 =S
(according to my limited knowledge of geography…)
24 Andres
December 29th, 2009 at 2:49 am
“Such a theory would be the biggest breakthrough in physics since Einstein.”
A theory of everything could arguably be the single biggest breakthrough in the history of physics.
Also, I seriously disagree with number one. Who is waiting for that? In what ways would mankind benefit from dipping into a sea of molten metal at extremely high pressures? A good alternative to number one would have been some sort of time travel device, an unobstructed interaction between the human mind and technology, or something like that.
Otherwise, I really enjoyed the thoroughly interesting list.
25 MPW
December 29th, 2009 at 2:58 am
Just about all of these topics have been discussed on NatGeo and Discovery etc. An interesting read no doubt.
26 Paul
December 29th, 2009 at 3:07 am
“. . . if head transplants were combined with cloning, then people might murder their own clones to double their life spans.”
This assumes that clones have the same right to life that non-cloned humans have. If I cloned my body but kept the brain undeveloped, specifically for the purpose of transplantation, where’s the problem?
27 defil3r
December 29th, 2009 at 3:09 am
@Andres (25):
get to centre of teh earth
get infinite diamonds and oil…..
we win the game
28 junqueman
December 29th, 2009 at 3:21 am
@ dr_haxOr How bout a head transplant of your noggin–like taking it out of your a@@ and putting it on your shoulders like everyone else.
29 henrysmyagent
December 29th, 2009 at 3:25 am
We are rapidly reaching the limits of what we can learn due to the self-restraints imposed by myths, superstitions, and religions. Why do people consider a book or philosophy holy and perfect when it was written by men who could not properly explain something as simple as rain? How much of human endevour is wasted in counterproductive activities such as burning grain for Zeus, planning and reading horoscopes, reading tea leaves, facing Mecca five times a day, doing nothing after sundown on the Sabbath, going to church on Sunday, dealing Tarot cards, or reading chicken bones? Only by freeing our minds to understand the incredible complexity of our multiverse can we humans hope to master the innerworkings of reality. Mankind will one day throw off the chains of mythology and ignorance to embrace the commonality of people and the interesting complexities of a rationable and knowable existence.
30 Kibey
December 29th, 2009 at 3:26 am
@dbrownl (23): A cure for cancer? We can make new people easily and cheaply. Putting shit into space easily and cheaply requires a space elevator.
31 defil3r
December 29th, 2009 at 3:29 am
@henrysmyagent (31):
ok yeahh
lets go back to the time when your science thought the earth was flat and on the backs of elephants while the book of jeremiah (in the bible btw) says how it is a circle and hung on nothing.
and the ‘failed religion you speak of?
the upanishads talk about the ‘frequency that makes up all things’…pretty much what most string theorists are looking for
so seriosuly, dont be a troll mate.
32 whoop
December 29th, 2009 at 3:29 am
Babel fish
I’m sure we should have a proper translator by now. How hard can that be?
33 k1w1taxi
December 29th, 2009 at 3:34 am
#10. Just imagine how bloated the MS OS would be for them:D
#8 & 5 Note how both India and Russia are mentioned here. Nether of which country is exactly brimming with wealth and a lack of social problems to raise this high on a budgetary agenda you would think.
#4 This is probably where any country wanting to seriously get into Space should be spending it’s money, but I guess it’s not as sexy as A Man On Mars. The other benefit is that much of the business that has been explored at the ISS that requires a lack of gravity would be much cheaper (and hence affordable) with a Space Elevator.
#1 Agree with those that are not waiting with bated breath for this one.
Cheers
Lee
34 henrysmyagent
December 29th, 2009 at 3:44 am
@defil3r (33)
I could accept the condemnation of being called a troll if I were advocating hate for mythology in general or any one religion in particular. My position is that there is no value in the exercise of propagating things that are not real. We face problems in the here and now that fantasy and religions are powerless to alleviate.
There is no “your science” there is only provable facts and everything else. A close reading of neither the Bagavad Gita nor the Book of Mormon will aid in the discovery of cold fusion or a greater yield rice grain.
35 dr_hax0r
December 29th, 2009 at 3:46 am
@junqueman
ad hominem attacks are a logical fallacy; so there would be no point in debating you.
36 Houssam
December 29th, 2009 at 3:52 am
One of the best lists so far; I nominate this for the list of the year
37 Morticia
December 29th, 2009 at 4:02 am
Stop wasting money on improbable future-distant space exploration and feed the starving NOW.
38 defil3r
December 29th, 2009 at 4:04 am
@henrysmyagent (36):
@Morticia (39):
i think that morticia’s comment is the perfect answere to what your saying
humanity is the key
not some far fetched multi-billion pound escapade to a planet when millions die of hunger and poverty
39 El the erf
December 29th, 2009 at 4:18 am
Andres is spot on.
A journey to the center of the earth would clearly serve no purpose whatsoever. It merely seems as if the author has ripped it right out of the book. Jules Verne might have been got the submarine act right, but most of his ideas about what the interior of the Earth might contain have been proven wrong.
It is as ludicrous as climbing the Everest after laborious days of trekking and then hollering at the top of your voice “I am at the top of the world!” only to discover that the air just got a hell lot chiller.
Otherwise, quite a fantabulous list.
What might sound inconceivable today might become a necessity later on.
Head transplant is very much in the realm of possibility.
Lazzaro Spallanzani ,the Italian physiologist, who was one of the founders of experimental biology successfully grafted the head of one snail onto the body of another in a transplant experiment way back in 1769.
Russian plastic surgeons have also been successful in grafting the head of one dog on the body of another in 1959.
I know this is gonna sound childish, but I was really expecting Super-hero suits to be up there.
In fact in 2007, Italian scientists did find a formula based on nanotechnology to build a spiderman suit and they have already started working on it (man, am I dying to get my hands on one!)
The Iron Man suit (‘coolest thing I’ve ever seen’) too seems a sure-shot possibility.
40 Jasper
December 29th, 2009 at 4:47 am
@henrysmyagent (31): @henrysmyagent (36): Those statements just are not true. If you honestly believe that, then you have a gross misunderstanding of religion.. Just how does a god or God stand in the way of progress? Oh yeah, embryonic stem cell research – hint, you don’t need to be religious to be morally opposed to anything relating to abortion or experimenting on aborted fetuses.
Are Bible thumping Baptists going to contribute much to a Mars expedition if they weren’t thumping Bibles? Not really. Are Koran thumping IT Techs going to contribute much to physics if they weren’t Muslim? Doubt it. Are Jewish school teachers going to contribute to cloning if they were’nt Jewish? Nope. Are chicken bone throwing, tarot card reading Voodoo practitioners going to develop clean energy if they stopped believing in magic? Not likely.
I am not aware of too many scientific restrictions in the Bible, the Torah, or the Koran (to hit the 3 big R’s). If a person interprets a holy text and claims God created the Earth in 6 literal days, SO WHAT??? What is that to you? Where is it written, anywhere, “Thou shalt not travel to Mars” or “Thou shalt not cure cancer”, “Thou shalt not transplant heads”, or “Thou shalt not look at atoms, or gaze at stars, or try to figure anything out”. It’s not.
If people not trained in science, or have no overwhelming interest in science stand in your way, then maybe you’re not a great scientist to begin with… Definately not a social scholar.
41 Chanchita
December 29th, 2009 at 4:48 am
@ Morticia: You are SO right, that was in my mind when I was reading all the items about fucking pointless, time and money wasting, selfish, sinful and contemptible millions spent on space exploration. Before we worry about other planets, let´s take care of our neighbours on our own planet. There is nothing so significant to be gained from space exploration that it is more valuable than the lives of human beings. I would love to get hold of NASA´s finance computer and do some redirecting of funds.
The only thing on this list worth spending taxpayers´ – or anyone else´s for that matter – money on, is finding a cure for cancer. I was expecting that to be number one.
42 Dragos
December 29th, 2009 at 5:01 am
Head Transplant, c’mon you are insane :-j
So I look: http://alturl.com/de3s
43 SteveC
December 29th, 2009 at 5:04 am
“Clean energy”…natural gas and nuclear power can provide more energy and at a cheaper rate than solar and wind. Funny how people like talking about wind farms, yet won’t allow them in their backyard (like the late Ted Kennedy). It’s the ultimate NIMBY and unicorn energy source.
44 Karl
December 29th, 2009 at 5:09 am
Great list, but there’s something missing. TIME TRAVEL.
@henrysmyagent (31): Oh, and by the way, your ideology has flaws. Like what Einstein said, “Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind.” That’s means that religion is or was involved in some of the advancements that science has provided us. Imagine scientific progress without the monastaries of the Middle Ages, or algebra without Islam. Imagine banking without the Jews, philosophy without St. Augustine, the calendar without sacred rituals. Without these our modern world will be nothing. So what if you think that what we believe in is, what you say, “fictional”. We’ll still believe in it no matter how insulting your statements are against us. If you say that the world will progress without religion, you are sadly mistaken. The world will be a more cruel, more savage place than before. Religion was once a tool to explain things. Science came along later. Today we use science to explain things while we use religion as moral guidance. Remember that scientific progress can lead us to disaster. The Holocaust, the atomic bomb, World Wars I & II, these things are the result of scientific progress. Yes, religion throught the ages caused many wars but religion also brought in culture & the arts. The world would be less cultured without religion. I believe that science & religion can co-exist to make the world a better place. It doesn’t matter whether or not you believe in God or not. What matters is that our species will continue to survive throughout the ages, and for our species to survive, we should avoid what I call “civil wars” in our species & work together & respect each other to achieve peace. The goal of all religions is not only to understand the world, but also to achieve peace & respect. I respect your ideas but you should respect mine. I don’t force people to take my ideas & I think that’s what your are doing right now. You are stating that scientific progress will make us gods. But nobody’s perfect. That’s just hubris. Compared to the rest of the universe we are just a speck of dust. Too much pride will lead us nowhere. It will just consume us until we are destroyed. I have pride on the human spirit but not too much because we make mistakes. I hope that my sort of “web speech” will melt your cold, hard soul. You said that you have this raging hate at all religions. Well, I’m a Catholic & if you don’t respect me, I won’t respect you.
Seriously, don’t be a troll, mate.
45 Armodillotron
December 29th, 2009 at 5:13 am
What about cloning? I`d love to clone myself. and Where is time travel? You could go back and change world events. You could go back and kill Hitler, stop JFK being assassinated, stop 9/11, and so on. If you went back and stopped 9/11 from happening, there`d be no War on Terror, no invasion of Afghanistan, and invasion of Iraq, and poor old Saddam Hussein would be alive, no Bali, Madrid, London bombings, and none of the other shit we`ve had for the past 8 years. And head transplants? That was done YEARS ago!
46 tripsyman
December 29th, 2009 at 5:14 am
Why do a whole head transplant surely just transplanting the brain would be enough and accomplish the same thing??
47 Isaac Newton
December 29th, 2009 at 5:15 am
WHAZZZZZZZAAAATTTTTTT?????????
48 Karl
December 29th, 2009 at 5:16 am
@Jasper (42): I agree. People should mind their own business. There is nothing written in the Bible that said “Thou shalt not do space travel because it will cripple your bones.” And the God DOES NOT halt human progress. I have seen & read about Muslim scientists. Do you think their religion stands in the way in scientific progress? No, it does not.
49 Karl
December 29th, 2009 at 5:17 am
P.S. Head transplants? WTF????
50 flgh
December 29th, 2009 at 5:18 am
We only need #7 & #6; what’s the point of the other 8? Waste of time, effort & resources!
51 defil3r
December 29th, 2009 at 5:39 am
@Armodillotron (47):
yeahh…but anyone who knows muc habout timetravel theory will know that most likely time travel/changing past leads to bag things OR will only affect a parallel dimension
*nods*
52 chubbmeister
December 29th, 2009 at 5:48 am
I hope we never “invent” timetravelling. Who gets to decide what we “change”. Sure, we all want to kill Hitler, but what happens if we do? Maybe as a result you won’t exist suddenly. And you’ll likely go crazy, because all your memories can be untrue in an instant. Better to learn from the past…
53 oouchan
December 29th, 2009 at 5:56 am
Put me down for space travel!
I liked this list. Almost like a wish list. However, adding in curing ALL diseases and a better means of feeding people should be included as well.
54 El the erf
December 29th, 2009 at 6:15 am
The vagrant in the starting scene in A Clockwork Orange aptly put it “…n men on the moon n men spinning around the earth ,but there is not no attention paid to the earthly law order no more”
55 O2BDumb
December 29th, 2009 at 6:20 am
@dr_haxOr: your snobbish comments are of no value.
This list-maker brought up some thought-provoking ideas as described by the introduction. He or she does not have to hold a PhD in Physics in order to support the list choices. I enjoyed reading it and will further research those items that interest me.
Go write your own list and we’ll see the credibility of your own knowledge.
56 Arsnl
December 29th, 2009 at 6:27 am
@El the erf (41): in fact a journey to the exterior shells of the earth would greatly help in understanding the mechanism of earthquakes and would help us predict them way better than we can now (i think we can only predict earthquakes by a matter of minutes- doesnt do much help)
i was expecting a more serious list- head transplant geesh. Maybe some higgs boson or what other things the lhc is searching for. Maybe a different list is required for discoveries that could occir in the near future.
Also i knew that japanese scientists invented an exoskelet that improved on a human’s performance.
57 spaghettiworshipper
December 29th, 2009 at 6:31 am
@ Karl (50)
Dont be an ignorant fool. Just because some scientists are religious (very few) doesnt mean that religion helps science in general. How not? Well, the fact that for hundreds of years anyone who had anything correct to say about the universe and natural world that differed from the fairytale story you like to preach was killed. This certainley stunted scientific progeress.
What about religion having a problem with stem cell research, cloning and the theory of evolution, the even daring to create their own bullshit ‘science’ called ID and trying to get it taught in schools?
Religion nowadays does nothing but pollute the knowledge of mankind. The sooner people wake up and ‘see the light’, and realise that they have been living their lives according to a fairytale, preparing for death, the better.
What makees your God (out of thousands) so special?
58 defil3r
December 29th, 2009 at 6:33 am
@spaghettiworshipper (59):
true say…ie Scopes trial in USA
but….
the bible is quite scientific
whilst hte ”advanced” egyptians were smearing camelcrap on their houses, the ”isrealites” had high standards of hygene such as not touching the dead and not eating swine and such and such a fairytale
so dont be an ‘ignorant fool’ by having obvs not studied the bible and saying it is
59 rain
December 29th, 2009 at 6:45 am
Cool list. . .
Head transplant FTW!
How about travelling at the speed of light? Like in star wars.
60 Arsnl
December 29th, 2009 at 6:51 am
@Skrillah (20): a nut showed me the light and i have seen the light.
) i dont know but i prefer to believe in the huge mass of scientists that believe nowadays in the big bang + 9 billions euros spent on the lhc where they try to recreate conditions as the were at some few nanoseconds after the ….( you guessed it) the big bang. Its true that i dont have the knowledge but i doubt you have then and its obvious that the guy who write that article doesnt have the competence to critisize the BB. I guess its about who you chose to believe in. Im not the type of guy that believes in theories written on a blog by unknown einsteins.
61 defil3r
December 29th, 2009 at 7:01 am
@rain (61):
star wars was far far more than speed ofl ight
ie…. han solo doing kesel run in less than a few picoseconds
62 necro_penguin
December 29th, 2009 at 7:06 am
do we really need a computer that can hold thousands of years of HD video? REALLY? most of these things won’t do us a damn bit of good when we’ve all got cancer.
the ones we need to work on the most right now are the health/medicine ones. then we can worry about the rest.
63 Ineptly
December 29th, 2009 at 7:06 am
Creating a deity was the easiest way to explain the inexplicable. As humans advanced in fields of science, less was put on the shoulder of God. God deligates through science.
I wish I lived on a Martian base, provided there were no portals to Hell.
64 defil3r
December 29th, 2009 at 7:08 am
@necro_penguin (64):
quantum computing with DNA drivers
think about the processing power
you can just find the genome of any cancer in anyone and make lock-key combo medicines specified to that
also the ToE would just give us the answeres to cancer curing etc…
65 elbobbo
December 29th, 2009 at 7:18 am
The fact that things like moon bases and manned missions to mars are being even remotely considered combined with wasting hundreds of millions of dollars to crash a rocket into the moon to check for the amount of water shows me that governments are more concerned with wasting money than with fixing real problems like poverty, homelessness and, especially in the U.S., declining quality of public education.
66 Ineptly
December 29th, 2009 at 7:24 am
The reason that there is such a drive to leave Earth and reach the moon, Mars, etc is because there are plans to start a new Earth, free of the poor and uneducated and smelly. It’ll be paradise. Criminals and the ailing will be sent right back to Earth. Not the new Earth, the old Earth. We’ll call it Earth-One to prevent confusion.
Life will be different on Earth-Two. No crime, usage of renewable energy, no health or hunger problems. This has been a practice Earth. All those nerds we made fun of in school will have their Utopia. It’ll be kind of like the movie Idiocracy. On Earth-One, not on Earth-Two; earth-Two will be like some other movie where all the inhabitants are happy and safe and respected. It’ll be like what Earth-One was supposed to be like.
I want to go to Earth-Two now
67 defil3r
December 29th, 2009 at 7:28 am
@Ineptly (68):
we wANT YOU to go earth no.2 as well ¬¬
JOKE xD
nahh butfair point
but tbh e2 will only be afordable by the superrich bill gates/warren buffets of the world
^^
68 timmar68
December 29th, 2009 at 7:30 am
“If God didn’t want us to do all this, then he wouldn’t have given us the knowledge to do so.”
That’s my argument when I come across religious fanatics who don’t believe in evolution and the like. It usually shuts them up.
69 defil3r
December 29th, 2009 at 7:33 am
@timmar68 (70):
2 easy comebacks
1-seeing as ‘we’ had to work hard to find it out….not really given to us? ie marrie curie dying of cancer to reasearch radioactivity
2-we also have the knoledge to murder…<—nuff said
70 El the erf
December 29th, 2009 at 7:33 am
You say “exterior shells” and who says not to bring out what lies beneath? There is uranium n oil n gems and there is info about quakes as you say..
But when at 93 million miles away from the 5000°C red-hot surface of the sun we are getting more than nuff energy then pray,what need do we have to plunge in some odd 2500 miles into the earth which has roughly about the same temperature??
71 defil3r
December 29th, 2009 at 7:35 am
@El the erf (72):
Uses less energy to use gravity and go down (when techno gets to that level)
also, there is no way to harness suns energy
so i guess that should be a point on the list
#11- harness suns energy/cold fusion?
72 Morticia
December 29th, 2009 at 7:35 am
@Chanchita (43) – Thank you for putting it across more eloquently than I did! How any one can look into the haunted eyes of a malnourished child and think instead – “yeah, lets beat the Russians / Americans / Chinese to Mars” is completely beyond me.
73 El the erf
December 29th, 2009 at 7:37 am
Re (58) i.e.
74 Moonbeam
December 29th, 2009 at 7:48 am
This has to be one of my favorite lists. Nice job Thempler. It’s thought provoking and – what a surprise – it has once again inspired the god exists vs religion is fantasy debate. How about we respect each others beliefs? Nah, what am I saying? No fun in that.
I wonder what the point would be to have a permanent moon base? Does any one know what value, scientific or otherwise, that it would have? (Of course I was compelled to comment on the moon entry. After all, it’s my name.)
75 defil3r
December 29th, 2009 at 7:50 am
@Moonbeam (76):
1- i guess moon base would alow us to enterprise a whole new place roughlt 1/4 the size of earth
2- moonbeam, how you get a picture for your profile. i cant seem to add one to mine
76 Ny
December 29th, 2009 at 7:52 am
#5 – Honestly, everything I know about such a matter is from Doctor Who. ie, we shall have a base on Mars named Bowie base 1 by the year 2059 and then will be infected by a water-monster named the Flood and ultimately explode.
Good times.
77 El the erf
December 29th, 2009 at 7:53 am
@defil3r (73):
“also, there is no way to harness suns energy”
WHAT!!!
We can cook using the sun’s energy.
We can generate light using the sun’s energy.
We can even fly using the sun’s energy (yes! the Solar challenger ,an airplane whose power came entirely from electricity generated from solar power crossed the English Channel on July 7, 1981)
So dearie, what you talking about??
78 Metalwrath
December 29th, 2009 at 7:58 am
Nice list.. I don’t understand the haters, all the items of this list are very possible, and although some may sound extravagant, they are definitely being researched. I’d be most excited for those concerning space, like a mission to Mars and a space elevator.
One thing that could be added to this list is a fully operational exo-skeleton (like in the Starship Troopers book, or like Space Marines in Warhammer or Starcraft). I know exo-skeletons are currently being developed by the US army, it would be pretty cool :p
Also, robots with some form of autonomy or AI is another scientific achievement which is very possible and which we are waiting for.
79 defil3r
December 29th, 2009 at 8:00 am
@El the erf (79):
solar challenger had something like a weight of 100kg?
it would never be practiacly viable
also, solar energy is soooooOOOOOOO000ooooo ineficient due to the loss in heat
it can never be done harnessed@a level that makes it economicly viable
current solar panels have…at best…a pay back time of 3-5 years!
80 defil3r
December 29th, 2009 at 8:01 am
@Metalwrath (80):
like…I AM IRON MAN ^^
@El the erf (41): (last line)
81 El the erf
December 29th, 2009 at 8:07 am
@defil3r (82): no arguments there
82 Arsnl
December 29th, 2009 at 8:16 am
@defil3r (81): what about the solar panels on satelites. Do you think they care AA batteries:p. Hubble has them. The ISS also. Im not saying woow everybody should go and put solar panels on their roof but in some places it is usefull. Ive also hear france and germany plan to install solar panels on a huge surface in the sahara desert. Its obvious thag the future wont be focused jusg at one source of energy (like we have fossil now) but a multitude of sources: nuclear solat wind etc etc
83 randomprecision24
December 29th, 2009 at 8:36 am
Interesting list. I’m looking forward to the trip to Mars.
84 Ray Naldo
December 29th, 2009 at 8:40 am
My List:
1- Time Travel
2- Penis transplant
That’s it.
85 GTT
December 29th, 2009 at 8:49 am
@Armodillotron (47): @chubbmeister (54):
I agree… Who knows how the future would be altered if you changed the past… You kill Hitler but you might get another (possibly worse) dictator in his place…
I would love the idea of time travel only to be able to see different cultures up close. Can you imagine going back and living amongst the ancient Egyptians for a week? or the ancient Greeks? Or the court of Henry VIII? Fascinating.
86 deni
December 29th, 2009 at 8:52 am
good information,
but what about death
beating the death or staing young is the best goal.
87 MzFly
December 29th, 2009 at 8:53 am
LMAO @ the pic for #3! So a man wrote this list right?
88 JustSayin’
December 29th, 2009 at 9:01 am
@ spaghettiworshipper (59)
“What makes your God (out of thousands) so special?” GREAT point.
And I suppose that Karl and the few other religious apologists on here haven’t heard about the story which I read a few years ago regarding a group of doctors-in-training in the U.K. They were studying MEDICINE yet were pressing the administration to permit them to opt out of the required courses in reproduction because such knowledge would violate their delicate religious sensibilities. It is true that great scientific knowledge has come from the Arabs (many of whom were, naturally, Muslim) but that was many centuries ago. The Islamic world has in relatively recent times started to regress rather than progress, due solely to a repressive fundamentalist resurgence in many of the region’s nations. And don’t think for a minute that if Christian fundies in the West–particularly in the U.S.–finally achieved the power that they lust for (isn’t that a sin, by the way?), it would be any different here than it is in so much of the Middle East.
P.S.: And let’s not get into the whole Einstein debate. Anyone who’s ever taken the time to research the matter would know that the man was in no way a fan of religion, nor was he a believer in any traditional sense. God, for him, was naturalistic, much as he was for the Deists, many of whom could be counted among America’s Founding Fathers.
89 JustSayin’
December 29th, 2009 at 9:03 am
I forgot to point out that the med students in my above example were Muslim.
90 poopi
December 29th, 2009 at 9:03 am
hi ray what about ur ass too its nice and full of shit. u wanna transplant that too moron?
91 GTT
December 29th, 2009 at 9:07 am
@spaghettiworshipper (59):
You dont necessarily have to hold religious beliefs to be opposed to things like abortion, stem cell research or cloning.
Oh, and just as a side note, not every person with religious beliefs is opposed to the theory of evolution. In fact, the Catholic Church has no problem with it. So maybe, just maybe you should stop spouting your uninformed stereotypes all over the Internet.
92 Skrillah
December 29th, 2009 at 9:09 am
Well as an undergraduate of astronomy and physics (NTU UK) in the final year, I don’t just accept anything written by, as you said unknown eisteins. And by the way Einstein’s knowledge is not the universal truth, so even if einstein himself had written it I would’ve never jumped to any conclusions.And this is not an article on some irrelevant blog trying to be controversial, this just represents the ”Developing underground status” of modern day,( modern; 2000 and beyond)Cosmology. It seems to me that you have just skimmed through the article because the belief you have about the occurrence of a Big Bang was so powerful that your mind automatically turned anything that poses a threat to it( By the use of Logically and mathematically derived points) away from your psychological debate hall.The author of this article is not the founding father of a ”Big Bang Hoax Clan” or anything, he’s just an individual trying to surface the hitherto suppressed questions that we never asked about the BB theory.And this just 1 out of thousands of online and offline material thats written regarding this matter.( It’ll reach the popular culture status by at least 2011) You said that you feel safe with the masses( scientists), while i respect your right to choose a side, let me also point out that most of the time the masses are proven to be asses and the majority of americans also felt safe when they chose Bush as their president.
In simple terms, The whole big bang theory boils down to one thing. SINGULARITY. What does it mean? well.. as Michio Kaku the popular American theoretical physicist puts it ” Singularity represents our ignorance.. why? because it means that we don’t know anything about it”
And remember Big Bang is just a theory which was put forward to explain the reasons behind certain phenomena. i.e. Red shift, Background radiation etc. What if we know exactly why far away galaxies seem to accelerate away from us?
“The conclusions derived from quantized red shift are devastating to the conventional view of the universe created in a single Big Bang, as devastating as Galileo’s first telescope was to the theory that the Earth was the center of the universe.
Georges Lemaître (like Aristotle) assumed there was no other explanation for the red shift he observed than the motion of the observed objects relative to Earth. But given the theory that the universe is expanding uniformly, the amount of red shifts would have to be uniformly and randomly distributed.
But they aren’t.
The observed red shifts in the sky are quantized, falling into discreet intervals. This is not explained by the theory that the red shift is produced solely by relative velocity. Some other effect is at work. And that means that the assumption that the universe is expanding based solely on the red shift is invalidated. Some other effect IS at work that explains the observations, quite possibly one that triggers a quantized red shift over vast distances without respect to relative velocity.
Which means the universe is not expanding. Which means there was no moment of creation, no “Big Bang” with an epicycle-esque cosmology to explain why the greatest black hole of all didn’t behave like a black hole. Which means that the background radiation mapped by COBE which didn’t quite fit the Big Bang model is probably the remnant of the stellar explosion that created the heavy elements making up that computer you are reading this on.”-http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/bang.html
A closed mind won’t change on its own, it continuously seek recommendations from its surroundings.
93 defil3r
December 29th, 2009 at 9:10 am
@spaghettiworshipper (59):
troll
94 Skrillah
December 29th, 2009 at 9:11 am
Comment 94 is a response from me to comment 62 by Arsnl.
95 Lifeschool
December 29th, 2009 at 9:22 am
Hi all,
I found the list today quite interesting on a number of levels, and it provoked me to chip in my two cents worth.
#10 – I think science is currently trying to remove the monkey altogether in order to get straight to the organ grinder.
Reminds me of Mnemonics, as in the book and movie Johnny Mnemonic, where a device is interted into the human brain. Or the movie eXisTenZ. DNA computers are possible, in fact science has at some stage wondered if all the information in the world would fill just a single drop of water. However, their experiments with DNA are currently (like GM crops) messing with natural perfection and are controvertial to say the least.
#9 – A moon base would only be of worth to re-fuel ships already headed for Mars. The moon is a baron rock mostly consisting of KREEP and Granite, and any value in mining would be far outweighed by the cost of transport (fuel), and other logistics such as building costs and even air. Even with space elevators in operation and robotic mining drones, there still wouldn’t be any point. However, a moon base would be a vital element in a Mars settlement program as a slingshot from the moon would negate the cost of fuel altogether (they wouldn’t need any!).
#8 – If a funland on the moon reminds me of Futurama, then the head transplant does too. If they can turn the brain into a super computer as they are trying to do (see #10 above), the’ll simply download your mind into the mainframe before you go ‘offline’ every night. Scary.
#7 – Cars can run off water. Generators can run off steam. Seems to me that as soon as we go 100% green they’ll just start moaning that there’s too much ‘water vapor’ in the air. Time to cap and trade that toxic H2O!
#6 – ‘Money, so they say, is the root of all evil – today.’ ~Pink Floyd. Big Pharma eh?
#5 – If something the size of a bus should strike Earth it could spell the end of life as we know it. The moon may be a second defence, or it could be blown out of it’s orbit like in the TV show ‘Space 1999′. We’re long overdue an apocalypse according to many scientific predictions based on previous cataclysmic events. Having said that, we still need a way to produce water so that it can be used to tame the red planet and to give us hydrogen and oxygen for breathing. Taking that much water with us will likely take a thousand years unless we invent an atmosphere processor (Aliens movie) or a space pipeline or something. Still a long way to go then before we step onto that very cold red planet. It may actually be cheaper to build a deathstar(!) and use that!
#4 – The idea is well over 100 years old and designs have been tested over the years. Arthur C. Clarke happened to push this idea in the mid 20c and many books and films have taken it futher (remember Dahls ‘Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator?’, anyone?). Unexpectedly, the only real sticking point facing this creation is How Do You Make A Continuous Cable Long Enough To Reach All The Way Into Space!! ‘Nuff Said.
#3 – Bill Hicks said it best.
#2 – Nanites are here, and have been for some time now. Imagine what would happen if this was used to manipulate and destroy instead of to cure? What would happen if this technology fell into the wrong hands?! Oh shit – too late.
#1 – Would provide absolutely no advantage to Man whatsoever. We know as much as we ever needed to know about a sea of magna in a mantle 2,890 km (1,800 mi) thick and over 3,000°c in temperature. Jules Verne it aint.
96 CandJ
December 29th, 2009 at 9:23 am
Interesting list,however speaking as a Cancer survivor,I think a cure for Cancer should be #1,just imagine how amazing that will be,if/when that day comes.
97 mom424
December 29th, 2009 at 9:29 am
Good premise but I would have preferred a little more technical data (well ‘cept the head thing).
@dbrownl (23): Nasa, Telecommunication companies, Satellite TV providers; lots of reasons for a space elevator. Do you have any idea how much it costs to place a satellite in orbit?
@Paul (28): Good plan Paul. We already have people murdering other people over the loss of potential life. And you want to kill actual life. Talk about a shit-storm.
@SteveC (45): We here in Canada already have tons of folks with their own private windmills/wind farms. We can hook-up to the grid and sell our excess power – and we can get a grant to do it. Also most of our power is hydro-electric; although not perfect it’s a damn site better than coal.
98 T
December 29th, 2009 at 9:36 am
I agree with #24. A cure for cancer is the most important thing.
99 Lifeschool
December 29th, 2009 at 9:42 am
Correction: #5 “to give us hydrogen [for fuel/warmth] and oxygen for breathing.”
100 Arsnl
December 29th, 2009 at 9:45 am
@Skrillah (94): well i guess you better knownledge in this field than me but i still feel that the level of knowledge needed to fully understand the phenomenon is beyond even you reach. The guy just made some statements in a blog. I really dont buy it. Again its a thing of choosing what side (well your statement about the masses is very wrong. Its like me saying that scientists are dumb cuz once upon a time a flying machine heavier than air was thought imposible. And the bush thing. Again wrong; plus im not such a big fan of kaku ever since i saw him on discovery channel talking -very seriously- about aliens and
how the look like on some planet). Ill just go with the thousands of smart people that work at the lhc and at cern and with my physics prof. Where i dont have the capabilities i prefer to go with people that seem thrustworthy.
Ps to all those people that are talking about religion- read the Read me first page. Is religion mentioned in the list. No. Is it an intersesting topic. No. So please stop boring people.
101 damien_karras
December 29th, 2009 at 9:45 am
Unfortunately, as cool as it would be to go back in time, Ronald Mallett and Hawking generally agree that going FORWARD in time is certainly possible, but you can only go back as far as when the newly invented Time Travel device was switched on.
As far as changing events in the past, the popular argument that puts a hole in this premise is the Grandfather Paradox. Multiple timelines, however, cannot be ruled out.
102 asdf
December 29th, 2009 at 9:49 am
Huh. I really thought flying cars would be there.
103 Lifeschool
December 29th, 2009 at 9:54 am
@asdf (104): Hi there. I once heard the main reason for no flying cars was the thought of congestion. If a pile-up happens on a motorway/freeway, hundreds of people are wounded…
104 PETER
December 29th, 2009 at 10:22 am
teleportation, time travel, flying car….
loved this list! Should have won the x-mas competition instead of that piece of shit christmas list
105 Cosmo312
December 29th, 2009 at 10:29 am
@Lifeschool (97): Number 1 is not pointless.
“We know as much as we ever needed to know about a sea of magna in a mantle 2,890 km (1,800 mi) thick and over 3,000°c in temperature.”
Except how to get at that practically infinite source of energy. Travelling inside the earth would be a test of technology, which will give us an invaluable source of information about how to tap at that energy.
It’s like the moon landings – they didnt in themselves actually acheve anything, just going to a big rock in outer space. But the moon landings gave so much to the science of space travel in the process, they were ultimately worth the effort.
106 stung4ever
December 29th, 2009 at 10:30 am
I’d say a big one, not on the list, would be a Star Trek type transporter. Even if it turned out to be feasible for living matter, it would save millions of dollars and man hours transporting goods.
107 Moonbeam
December 29th, 2009 at 10:34 am
@defil3r (77): To add a picture go to “Register” at the top right of this or any list page. It’ll take you to WordPress. I think you just follow along filling in the blanks, then upload a photo. My “name” Moonbeam was already taken, so I had to come up with a slightly different name for wordpress, but I can still use “Moonbeam” for Listverse by typing it in along with my email address as I did before I registered.
My moon picture is actually a photo my husband took from our back yard.
108 El the erf
December 29th, 2009 at 10:44 am
Flying cars!
That reminds me of the material ‘flubber’ from The Absent Minded Professor (the original 1961 film, not the 1997 trash remake, Flubber).
It was the coolest thing I ever saw as a kid, just next to monster blood…until Iron man happened.
109 Zak
December 29th, 2009 at 10:49 am
Where is cold fusion?
110 Arsnl
December 29th, 2009 at 10:55 am
@Cosmo312 (107): well since they didnt repeat the experience (i mean in a different space program than apollo) and since -to my knowledge- nasa moved the dates of new lunar landings further away all of it may have been worth is but just for a limited number of times. Also really massive and very complex projects really tend not to work properly – take a look at the lhc. So i really doubt drilling to the magma and getting energy is very wise. Plus imagine that the tectonic plates always move so again you would built on “shaky soil”.
111 Lifeschool
December 29th, 2009 at 11:17 am
@Cosmo312 (107): I can see your points there, and yes they could find infinite energy there – but what happens when we drill holes to find out? It will either aleviate the pressure (like accupuncture) or create a shaft a magma which spews out like the air from a balloon! I wouldn’t be willing to chance anything.
Besides, why don’t they just cap volcanoes and stick pipes down into them? Perhaps they don’t want to risk an erruption?
112 Sanja22
December 29th, 2009 at 11:26 am
At 10defil3r: I totally argee with you about the tesla thing!
113 deeeziner
December 29th, 2009 at 11:34 am
I too would like to see less money worldwide devoted to projects like a moonbase, manned Mars mission or space elevator.
At least until we actually have located a planet that can support human life on it’s own merits. i.e. Human viable atmosphere, water, already existent eco-chain.
Don’t try to convince me that a Mars base would make the locating of such a planet easier, or more likely to succeed. The distance between Earth and Mars may be vast to the common way of thinking, but not nearly so vast as to make a dent in the amount of space being scanned from Earth for such a planet.
On the other hand I hold no degrees, but in this time of recession/depression in the U.S. and worldwide it seems some of the space exploration budget would be better spent for projects here on Earth.
Interesting list Thempler, Thought provoking, and has proven to liven up the comments area.
114 cascading spirit
December 29th, 2009 at 11:41 am
Head transplant???? Is that a joke?
115 samfishers
December 29th, 2009 at 11:55 am
I believe you forgot(to my opinion at least) speed of light and to completely explore the deep blue sea.
116 Penis
December 29th, 2009 at 12:16 pm
Cool list
117 Armodillotron
December 29th, 2009 at 12:25 pm
Well(GTT)yeah, you`re actually right, going back in time and killing Hitler sounds good, but it could have negative effects. but if you went back and talked to him, saying, “look we`ve lost the war,” and encouraged him not to try and conquer the world, It wouldn`t have any negative effects. But if you went back and stopped Henry VIII from becoming King, there`d have been no split from Rome, Dissolution of the Monastries, no Mary Tudor being Queen, no civil war, no reformation, no Gunpowder Plot, and no sexy The Tudors show. so England and the world, would be an even more different place if you got rid of Henry VIII, than if you killed Hitler.
118 sophiamercadini
December 29th, 2009 at 12:36 pm
Head transplant.. To watch out for..
119 saranciel
December 29th, 2009 at 12:53 pm
defil3r here
anywhoo…i think that nanonmachines are cool
@moonbeam i got the picc
120 Luv4Tahoe
December 29th, 2009 at 1:02 pm
I think teleportation would be great. Just imagine being able to jump into your teleporter, enter your destination, and POOF, you’re there. No planes, no long car trips. I think about this every time I have to take that damn car ride all the way to my parents house to visit 320 miles away. I won’t fly there, it is a VERY small town, and any plane that would land/take off from that airport, is NOT a plane I would get on. TELEPORTATION, why can’t we have it yet?!
121 tripsyman
December 29th, 2009 at 1:08 pm
Don’t know if anyones mentioned it yet but what about stopping the aging (is that how its spelt?) process. There must be some way to turn of the gene that causes the body to slowly break down.
122 Yoyos
December 29th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
Tripsyman – There are some creature that are thought to either undergo aging very slowly or even never. One is called Hydra (Genus): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydra_(genus)
And to the list – very good, but i’m sure someone said somewher that there is cures for cancers, but not a single cure.
123 bug9513
December 29th, 2009 at 1:28 pm
“A greater fear is that if head transplants were combined with cloning, then people might murder their own clones to double their life spans.”—Does’t that statement basicaly sum up the theme to the book, The House of the Scorpion.
Also, a “journey” to the center of the Earth would benifit nobody, but at thoe pressues and temperatures, would most likely to create a mega-volcano more devastating than if Yellowstone were to blow, so this “journey” would be more dangerous than benificial, if at all possible.
The permanent moon base is a lot further off than 2024, because it wouldhave to be entirely self sustaning and would probably have to find a way to produce food, orwe would have to be flying shuttles up there at least bi-weekly, or thye would starve, and dehydrate to death
124 nolightshed
December 29th, 2009 at 1:44 pm
You know, there already is a proven cure for cancer. It’s just that nobody wants to fund the production. Global conspiracies and stuff. See more here – http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=125794056478
125 redcabose
December 29th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
Thanks for a real interesting list. I think that someday we will have most of these, and so much more.
And for you nay-sayers and not job out there, ease up. This was a fun list.
126 Armodillotron
December 29th, 2009 at 1:54 pm
Luv4Tahoe-There doing experiments with teleportation. There doing it with light particles, and have Succeeded! But teleportation a good idea? Have you seen The Fly? Suppose you go in your teleportation machine, and instead of a Fly, a Spider has built it`s web in there. You know? What would make more sense, would be if we had a TARDIS. Where you can go through space and time.
127 bassbait
December 29th, 2009 at 2:08 pm
lacks:
Discovery of life outside of earth
discovery of inhabitable planets
time travel
teleportation
ability to make a planet inhabitable (terraforming? I don’t know what it’s called).
Otherwise, good list.
128 bassbait
December 29th, 2009 at 2:10 pm
I also forgot:
Discovering the truth to the bermuda triangle
being able to accurately predict, avoid, and possibly terminate natural disasters such as hurricanes, earthquakes, tornadoes, etc.
129 GTT
December 29th, 2009 at 2:13 pm
@Armodillotron (119): No offense but you really, honestly and truly think you can rationally talk Hitler out of “conquering the world” for his master race? I think I´m going to start working on the time machine just so I can see you try.
In any case, changing Hitler´s course of action (even though peaceful, communicative means) would have profound effects on the modern world. Our collective conscious would be different. Without Hitler we would probably not have had a WWII, no Cold War, and you could even argue that the US would not be the superpower it is today… Again, vastly different modern world with who knows what consequences.
130 Theodore
December 29th, 2009 at 2:55 pm
What about anti-gravity machines?
Sci-fi always has one of those, e.g. UFOs that just sit there in the air, Luke Skywalker’s speedster, etc
131 Moonbeam
December 29th, 2009 at 2:55 pm
@saranciel (121): I’m glad I could help!
132 Muscarius
December 29th, 2009 at 3:08 pm
STOP AGING and DYING! How the hell this is not in the list?
It’s the single most important thing we as human race have been needing since we started speaking!
We DO NOT NEED to die! Death was good for evolution! Now we can handle our DNA and we can rely on science for evolution, not on random genetic code errors appearing between generations!!!
Overpopulation? One problem at a time! First I need stop aging. Then we’ll discuss overpopulation!
133 John Dudey
December 29th, 2009 at 3:19 pm
7 6 and 2 are the most important right nkow
134 John Dudey
December 29th, 2009 at 3:20 pm
7,6,2 arethe most important
135 frog
December 29th, 2009 at 3:25 pm
I thought Arthur Dent said the theory of everything was 42
136 oouchan
December 29th, 2009 at 3:41 pm
@frog (137): I thought it was Zaphod who said it as an answer to the Ultimate Question.
137 John Dudey
December 29th, 2009 at 3:48 pm
i thought it was 1.618
138 Andy
December 29th, 2009 at 3:59 pm
Dear Listverse, SITE YOUR FUCKING SOURCES! With Hate, Andy
139 k1w1taxi
December 29th, 2009 at 4:04 pm
42 is the answer to the Meaning of Life, The universe and Everything as supplied by Deep Thought.
Cheers
Lee
140 Ghoti
December 29th, 2009 at 4:08 pm
To all those advocating time travel. You do realise that a time machine on its own would be completely useless, don’t you? for example, if you travelled back in time say 5 minutes, you would stay in the same place. however, the Earth has moved 1000 miles in that time frame. so you could be anywhere from 1000 miles up, to buried 1000 miles undergroud. move any meaningful amount of time, and suddenly the Earth is nowhere to be seen. hope you can hold your breath.
To be effective, you would need a time and space machine. Then you’d have to know exactly where the Earth was at any particular point in time you wished to go to, taking into account the earth’s rotation. Because if that were miscalculated, you could end up in the pacific.
Also Frog, that was the answer to life the universe, and everything.
141 astraya
December 29th, 2009 at 4:11 pm
@defil3r (63): Han said that the Falcon could make the Kessel run in “less than twelve parsecs”, which is a load of rubbish. A parsec is a unit of distance. It is the equivalent of me saying “My car is so fast I can drive from here to the centre of Sydney in less than twelve miles”.
Later explanations include that the Kessel run includes several black holes, and one must navigate as close to them as possible to produce the fastest run, but Han is not boasting about his navigational skills.
@frog and oouchan: “The Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything” was calculated by the computer Deep Thought.
@John Dudey: Life is irrational!
Try http://www.matematicas.unal.edu.co/airlande/phi.html.en (the golden number to 17 billion digits).
142 astraya
December 29th, 2009 at 4:11 pm
Damn. Spent too long typing.
143 skwirl
December 29th, 2009 at 4:27 pm
You, I and everyone else on this planet are part of the universe trying to figure itself out.
I once read that in the very distant future, after the universe has grown cold and only patches of random particle movement exists; everything that could be will have been.
This list is the Top ten Achivements We are waiting for.
Mine in no order:
-The singularity
-NanoFog/nanoassemblers (Drexler Utopia)
-Quantum Teleportation
-World Barter/Monetary system
-Inexpensive water treatment and irrigation systems
-Full bionic interfaces
-Discovery of a graviton and study of its structures
-Dyson Sphere technology
-Consciousness(sp?)(cognative) Transfer/Teleportation
-Population Control
My lists could go on forever but those 10 should suffice.
We are a young entity in the universe, Our minds have only been developing about 1 million yrs. Most of us think the far future is 10,000yrs.
Last estimates put the universe at 14 BILLION yrs and our sun will last another 6 BILLION yrs. Stars with greater mass and longer lives are still being born so we can estimate the universe lasting much longer than another 14 BILLION yrs. Our essence could survive longer than our sun but only if we can escape the confines of our starsystem. Space exploration is fundamental to our survival.
What will we be in 5 million yrs? Will we still be considered human?
144 deeeziner
December 29th, 2009 at 4:39 pm
@Andy (140): Learn how to spell “CITE”
145 deeeziner
December 29th, 2009 at 4:47 pm
@astraya (143):” @frog and oouchan: “The Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything” was calculated by the computer Deep Thought.”
Nice curveball Astraya, and ultimately accurate.
146 skwirl
December 29th, 2009 at 4:51 pm
I apologize for the double post but there are a few more things I wish to communicate.
Spirituality is the knowledge that there is something in the universe that is greater than you. Religion is man’s attempt to confine spirituality to specific boundries. Neither is wrong as long as you agree inside. You can fool other people but you CanNot fool yourself. nuff on that. Believe what you want – I know I do.
As ‘WE’ I am refering to the human endeavor. We as a species not a specific entity.
We have stopped a photon. Then restarted it.
We have established the universe is FULL of life building molecules.
We have manipulated atoms.
We have expanded our visual spectrum
We can see thru solid objects
We can comprehend complex ideas
We can create theoretical models
We ‘Sense’ the ethereal
We established scientific method
We create art and music
We empathize with other lifeforms
I barely scratch the surface of our accomplishments.
All of what we are has only had about 1 million yrs to grow. As a species we are young. Insects are far older than us but we seem to have out paced them in many ways. What if our species lasts as long as insects or plants? How far will we grow? All of everything we have ever accomplished would be an eyeblink in those time frames. We are only limited by our own restrictions.
I won’t live to see many of this top 10 list. I am but a particle of the foundation that we will become. To think anything else is an illusion of grandure. Reality is far starker than we wish to see.
147 americaprime
December 29th, 2009 at 5:02 pm
If America gets to the core first, and the worlds oil is more easily accessible, we can then PUT OUR STRAW IN THE WORLDS MILKSHAKE!!! WE DRINK IT UP!!!! HAHAHHAH
148 Blogball
December 29th, 2009 at 5:05 pm
Concerning # 1 here is something neat we could build after we solve that “entire weight of the world is on top of you” problem. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_train
149 skwirl
December 29th, 2009 at 5:06 pm
[quote]To be effective, you would need a time and space machine.[/quote]
Time travel is interesting to me.
Perhaps we did establish time travel. What if!
What if:
*UFOs were real but they were not aliens but our descendants?
*The common alien – Grey?- was just a future evolution of us?
*Time travel becomes possible not 1,000s of years from now but Millions or even 10′s of millions of years from now?
A note about displacement
appx 225 million years for our star to circle this galaxy.
Its unknown to me how long it takes this galaxy to circle its supercluster but this all indicates that even if we were to step off and wait for the sun to come around on the guitar we would still miss our mark because the galaxy had moved. Unless – Time is spacially locked within a galaxy. That would indicate that time could not be constant in the universe.
A time traveller from 225 million years in the future could not dock our dimensions and walk across. They would need precise calculations accounting for earth rotation, solar rotation, galactic rotation, supercluster rotation and universe rotation, side drift and fluctuations. Not impossible but far beyond any means currently comprehended.
Time travel may be possible but no where close to within our grasp.
150 therush
December 29th, 2009 at 5:15 pm
Here’s the real top ten list:
1. Commercially viable jetpack
2-10: Nobody cares because we have jetpacks.
151 Z0mgZ0rs
December 29th, 2009 at 6:03 pm
Bad list. Nuclear isn’t clean. Opposite of clean. Worse than fossil fuels. Clean Energy isn’t a scientific achievement, it’s something that is blatantly obvious that is already being done, but being suppressed by both the oil companies and the government.
/rant
152 nuriko
December 29th, 2009 at 6:03 pm
head transplant is ridiculous!
153 Arsnl
December 29th, 2009 at 6:22 pm
@Ghoti (142): when you that if you enter a time machine you may end up on the bottom of the pacific you are selecting an universal referential. A no no if you consider general relativity. But its quite an interesting point of view ive never thought about. I guess its due to the fact that we imagine time machines as big boxes with a door
154 trfan
December 29th, 2009 at 7:31 pm
My scientific achievement I’m waiting for is a more humane alternative treatment for cancer than chemotherapy (radiation notwithstanding). There has to be a better way of treating cancer than by poisoning the patient. My sister has gone through two rounds, and the cancer has still spread. I don’t know if she’ll still be here next Christmas. If things like the nanotechnology would work without killing the patient, I’m all for it.
155 calm_incense
December 29th, 2009 at 8:08 pm
Great list. Shame the comments are so full of stupidity.
156 segues
December 29th, 2009 at 8:36 pm
Personally, selfishly, I am looking forward to Nanomedicine. I have an extremely rare, and severely painful disease which, because it has attacked my spinal cord’s nerve roots, sheathes, and peripheral nerve bundles; encasing them in tumor like casings, squeezing them from every direction, even to the point of deforming the spinal cord itself.
Naturally, surgical options are not an option for me, but Nanomedicine, tiny DNA directed swarms of certain help, would be fabulous.
I think of all the various cancers and other diseases which could be helped by this new technology and pray it will come sooner, rather than later.
On a more lyrical theme, I hope to see the TofE! I have been reading Physics for 20+ years and the very idea is exciting beyond words.
157 littlegoldwoman
December 29th, 2009 at 8:36 pm
We already have something that explains the theory of everything. G-d!
158 scientister
December 29th, 2009 at 8:47 pm
the list loses all its credibilty by simply putting ToE in at number 3
159 bryainiac
December 29th, 2009 at 9:44 pm
to number 18 person who probably won’t reply to this, the flying car already does exist, you would be amazed at what the government does not show the citizens that pay for their experiments. we don’t need gas anymore for cars but companies need money, technology is so advanced you think they don’t have a solution for the oil problem, they do, its called water and they have mad cars that can run fully on water. the cure for cancer thing would be great, only problem is that cancer has like over 50 different forms so it should be like the cure for cancers. i don’t mean to offend but the space elevator just sounds ridiculous, i mean the earth moves at such a fast speed that a tower THAT huge would have to keel over with the speed of the rotating earth, i am not a person who knows about buildings but it sounds like a bad idea.
good list though, people should stop knocking it, it really is good.
160 Chanchita
December 30th, 2009 at 4:47 am
@ Armodillotron (119) My mum often tells me that if it weren´t for Hitler, her ex husband´s mum would never have fled Poland to go to England, and my mum would never have met her ex husband and moved to London, where she met her current husband, and I would never have been born.
Not saying that my life is worth all the lives of the people who died because of Hitler, I´m just saying, everything in history has had far-reaching consequences that we don´t even imagine. Changing one thing might fuck up absolutely everything.
161 saranciel
December 30th, 2009 at 4:48 am
@Chanchita (162):
hmmm true butterfly effect
162 moonsand
December 30th, 2009 at 5:04 am
Anyone who knows anything about physics knows a theory of everything would greatly surpass all the other items on the list, especially number one.
163 Ineptly
December 30th, 2009 at 6:55 am
Isn’t time travel the epitome of a paradox? I mean, if we create a time machine to go back and stop Hitler, then we would have never created the time machine in the future to go back and stop Hitler, meaning that we had never gone back in time to stop Hitler, meaning that Hitler still committed the attrocities of genocide. Therefore, is it possible to create a time machine at all; or can we just not have a purpose in mind before traveling? Time travel seems moot if we cannot travel with purpose. We would just become victims of our own devices. Or once we succeed in traveling through time, do we immediately enter into another universe/dimension? Is this correlated to the Membrane Theory?
Realistically, the most important scientific achievements for humankind would be some of the already mentioned like:
-Process by which we can create enough food easily and cheaply enough to feed the world over (cloning?)
-The cure for cancer and other major diseases and maleases
-Clean, non-destructive renewable resources (hydro, solar, wind)
Others to include (I haven’t seen them if posted):
-Process by which we can acquire clean and potable water
-Fat free, calorie free chocolate
-Perpetual energy
164 C. Boyle
December 30th, 2009 at 7:25 am
I am still waiting for teleportation. Airports suck!
165 calvin51
December 30th, 2009 at 8:09 am
I have some things to say.
1) Einstein was Jewish. So was he halted in scientific progress, henrysmyagent?
2) Time travel is theoretically an impossibility, concurring with Ineptly (165). This would be like shooting yourself in the past and causing a time paradox. And don’t start with black holes. Even if you entered one, your atoms would be all messed up, giving a blob of atomic structures.
3) This list was okay. I believe the theory of everything should have been number one or two, and a cure for cancer somewhere in the top three. Some of these are like doing something and wasting millions to see what happens. Other than that, it was relatively good.
166 Lifeschool
December 30th, 2009 at 8:49 am
@Muscarius (134): Ah yes, the aging process. Well, the people who ‘think’ they control the world publicise a 90% drop in population over the next generation or so. Last year they began the trials with H1N1. Imagine if we all lived forever! – with population growth as it is, we would cover every inch of land with habitation within a century. Somehow I can’t see your Universal Longevity dreams happening soon (outside the Biblical sense of course). I do however see bio-electro-chemical global mainframe in which memories never die and which we are all connected to. The prototype is here: The Internet.
Why oh WHY was I born in this time?
167 kutuup
December 30th, 2009 at 9:10 am
@ dr_hax0r
“ad hominem attacks are a logical fallacy; so there would be no point in debating you.”
You do realise that doesn’t even make sense, right?
What you basically said is the calling you an asshole because of your opinions (ad hominem argument) is a perfectly understndable (logical) mistaken belief (fallacy), and so there would be no point in discussing the person who said it (debating you???)…
I think you meant “Ad hominem arguments are ILLOGICAL, and so there would be little point in debating WITH you since you insist upon using them.”
Using fancy words only only sounds impressive if you can form an actual valid sentence that even somehow relates to the topic at hand with them. Your apparent logic would suggest that if I were to say “The quantum arbitrary exobytes form some manner of paradox within subatomic neutrality, the result of which is oncological hereditary juxtaposition.” I would therefore be the smartest poster on this board since by percentage my post contained the highest number of fancy words, regarless of the fact that what I said makes no sense by any stretch of the imagination.
Anyway, what I’m trying to say, in short, is you have encountered a logical and intellectual error and must be rebooted.
168 CandJ
December 30th, 2009 at 9:34 am
@158
Your not selfish,I have an Autistic son and I would give my life,for a cure for Autism.
169 segues
December 30th, 2009 at 9:47 am
@CandJ (170): As a mother of three myself, I can only imagine the pain in your heart. I know you must be a fierce advocate for your son, and for his health care.
I, too, would give my life gladly, to save the life of any of my children. I understand you, Cand, completely. It’s not even a question, is it?
I will now have your son in my thoughts every day.
Good luck to you, too, CandJ.
170 crispin
December 30th, 2009 at 10:01 am
@segues (158): I work for a pharma company that is investigating ways to cure ailments such as your own. I wish I could say more, but the specifics are rather proprietary; suffice it to say, from what I have seen in our company’s product development department, as well as news from other nanotechnology research, we are not too far away from acquiring and implementing the type of biotechnology that could cure conditions such as yours.
Nanotechnology is truly amazing, and mind-boggling fare. The product my company (Abraxis BioScience) currently makes treats breast cancer by encapsulating paclitaxel (a cancer-fighting agent) in the human albumin proteins found in yoru blood. Without going into great detail, through nanotechnology we are able to mix these two substances, which are like oil and water, into one nanoparticle. It still blows my mind every day.
171 segues
December 30th, 2009 at 12:18 pm
@crispin (172): Thank you for that ray of hope! I know I’m not alone when I say that living on a diet of strong narcotics, triplicates in bulk, is no way to live. Those of us in my position will celebrate the day nanotechnology becomes available for us all.
172 erickarthik
December 30th, 2009 at 12:23 pm
dumb list, except for the cancer cure thingy…
173 deeeziner
December 30th, 2009 at 2:29 pm
Backwards time travel would be a wonderful thing if it limited the traveler to the role of “observer only”. Imagine all the insight and understanding to be gained of our historical knowledge of man’s achievements ( and disgraces) as well as our understanding about how the Earth itself evolved. But I stress the words “observer only”.
@k1w1taxi (141): I apologize for skimming past your post and not recognizing you for your reference to Deep Thinker. I’m Sorry.
174 David
December 30th, 2009 at 2:52 pm
Why is it, that whenever their`s a debate about time travel, it always comes up, “you could go back and kill Hitler.” And cloning as well-”what if someone clones Hitler.” I`ve never got it. For Gods sake, it`s been over 60 years, since the old bastard died. You sometimes think the guy might has well as won the fucking War.
175 sammalamm
December 30th, 2009 at 3:30 pm
Hemp for fuel! Look into it! Read Jack Herers book “The Emperor Wears No Clothes.”
HEMP FOR FUEL!
176 moonsand
December 30th, 2009 at 4:34 pm
@Ineptly (165):
Those last two are paradoxes as well. Any form of ingested matter will have some calories, otherwise you wouldn’t be eating. Perpetual energy violates the law of conservation.
177 John Dudey
December 30th, 2009 at 4:34 pm
I believe complexity is the outcome of measurement, and is basically arbitrary.
In this context, I can’t help but think of what Gleick refers to as the Shoreline problem. The length of the shoreline of an island is a function of the length of the yardstick you use – the smaller the yardstick, the more little nooks and crannies you can measure.
In the same way, in many cases complexity is largely an outcome of scaling. Ignoring relationships reduces complexity, and which relationships we deem to be important is fairly arbitrary. If you throw a handful of sand onto a steel tray and decide that the total of relationships formed by a straight line drawn between any two grains is important to your measurement, then that’s pretty goddamend complex.
The question of what relationships ARE important tends to be constrained by what we can call control parameters. That is, what are the relationships which seem definitive to the dynamics of the system? Those are the ones we want to pay special attention to, and good modeling often boils down to the search for good control parameters.
Another way of saying that is, how much information can we ignore and still make accurate predictions? In the case of the brain, it seems that the state space of the significant relationships relative to the predictions we are interested in making are vast – ergo it appears to be an object of enormous complexity. But what if the only prediction we were interested in regarding the brain was its macroscopic structural integrity? Suddenly all that complexity goes away. We can take it for granted that most people will think the interesting behavior of the brain that is worth modeling/predicting is its cognitive behavior, but all that means is that in some cases most humans agree on what behavior is worth measuring.
In the words of Emo Philips, I used to think that the brain was the most fascinating thing there is. Then I realized, well, look who’s telling me that.
178 Miss_Info
December 30th, 2009 at 5:47 pm
Who won the iPod>
179 segues
December 30th, 2009 at 6:33 pm
@crispin (172): Do you know what Schwannomatosis is?
180 segues
December 30th, 2009 at 6:47 pm
@oouchan (138): oouchan, you are correct. In the Douglas Adams trilogy, The More Than Complete Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, Zaphod does, indeed respond to the Ultimate Question, that the answer is always 42.
In at least one (undoable) physics experience, he would be right, too!
181 Talim
December 30th, 2009 at 7:17 pm
@dbrownl:Don’t you understand? You see, we’re all waiting for the cure to cancer so I can see at least a bit where you’re coming from, but we need to focus on other things too. Like clean energy. Another disease could be even worse than cancer from pollution.
Nice list! I’d love to see all of this happen.
182 yrtsimehc
December 30th, 2009 at 9:34 pm
@ 169
what dr_hax0r said made perfect sense. It seems you’re the one who is mistaken.
Illogical = Logical Fallacy
so your “explanation” simply boils down to what dr_hax0r posted.
183 Rowena
December 31st, 2009 at 1:23 am
@134 Muscarius: Wouldn’t it get a little boring living for ever? Nothing changes.
I have heard a theory that life is only valuable because of death – without death, we can do anything anytime, and so we don’t have to do anything ever.
Also, Isaac Asimov pointed out once that virtually everyone who has contributed greatly to science has done so before they are 30 or 40 – afterwards they get stuck in their ways and merely chop down the theories of the up-and-coming scientists.
Oh, and to those people who said it is a grave minority of scientists who believe in some sort of god, that is actually incorrect. I have seen a survey in which 41% of the general Americans surveyed believed in some god. 42% of the biologists in the same survey believed. Unfortunately this is only biologists, but it is still a fairly interesting point.
A book I have read pointed out, also, that science started with Greeks (believing in many gods), Christians and Muslims. This is because they believe that a logical God created the earth and thus there are rules to be discovered. If they had not had a God, there would be no reason for them to suppose there were rules, and no reason to look for them.
184 Cj
December 31st, 2009 at 1:49 am
I’m not waiting for all these scientific achievements….
185 Chanchita
December 31st, 2009 at 5:59 am
@ Saranciel (163) WICKED film. Sorry, I know you weren´t referring to the film and it´s generally accepted to be a pile of shit, but I loved it. You´ve totally inspired me to go to Blockbuster tonight and rent it.
186 Muscarius
December 31st, 2009 at 9:22 am
Forever is a concept that I am sure nobody can grasp. I fear eternity both in life and death, but for sure, I’d chose to face it ALIVE!
Anyway: just think at extraordinary people that died. People whose minds gave so much to humanity. What’s the point of have them lost?
Also, again: overpopulation? Death as a solution for overpopulation? BUILD MORE SKYSCRAPERS! LIMIT 1 CHILD FOR COPUPLE! there are WISE ways to control overpopulation. Wiser than letting people die!
187 careless whisper
December 31st, 2009 at 2:20 pm
happy new year everyone
188 crispin
December 31st, 2009 at 3:04 pm
@segues (181): I was not familiar with that particular disorder until I googled it. I’m assuming this is what you deal with on a daily basis? I’m sorry if that is the case.
189 Jason S.
December 31st, 2009 at 6:10 pm
one of my fav lists stunning pics and awe inspiring theories
190 John Dudey
December 31st, 2009 at 7:07 pm
The merit of these theories is not in the scale of action in how broadly they explain the whole.
That’s a very good point, but I question whether descriptions at the smallest levels are truly broader. To take an analogy, does knowledge of the genetic makeup of an organism, or its celular structure, give us knowledge about the organism’s behavior?
Ultimately, the organism depends on its constituent parts, but large-scale phenomena aren’t necessarily comprehensible with reference to their constituent parts. Emergenct properties are simply not explainable by understanding the aggregate of their components – they are a fundamentally different animal.
> And could you explain what you mean about quantum weirdness being no more real the the macroscopic.
What I am referring to here is some of the weird outcomes of experiments pertaining to Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle, or the ‘Schroedinger’s Cat’ dilemma.
It seems to me that we can look at the world of macroscopic (perceptable) phenomena and question their ultimate ‘realness’, in the sense that we can take them apart and decompose them to smaller parts that have different characteristics. We can’t say a table is truly real, in and of itself, is we can easily break it and it is no longer a table.
Democritus had the idea that eventually you would get down to atoms that cannot be divided, and that these things are more real than anything else.
I think that’s basically been the presumption – that atoms are more real than molecules, which are more real than plants or rocks.
The problem is, on the quantum level you have the reverse problem of the macrsoscopic level. Nuclear particles exhibit perplexing behavior insofar as they are indeterminate or non-local. Take the problem of entanglement, for example, where you have particles locked in a fixed relationship. If you make a change to one of the particles, say, you reverse its spin, the other will change instantaneously, ignoring the spatial difference between them.
Our attempt to identify macroscopic phenomena as ‘fundamental’ is confounded by the problem that they can be decomposed into parts. Our attempt to identify atomic and sub-atomic phenomena as ‘fundamental’ is confounded in that they exhibit a character and behavior that is non-local in indeterminate.
191 Jeezlouise
January 1st, 2010 at 4:24 am
Cure for cancer should indeed be number one…
192 ccio
January 1st, 2010 at 4:27 am
@henrysmyagent (31):
I love you.
193 ccio
January 1st, 2010 at 5:12 am
@John Dudely (192):
It is not very realative to base our understandings of reality on the material endurance of things. From my idea of reality, either something exists, appears to exist(pictatorial realism), or it is simply not there, and it is whichever category it belongs to that determines the realistic features of the object. It is bogus to point out how unreal a table is on HOW easily it is broken, whether it CAN or CANNOT exist, or that WHEN something ceases to exist has an effect on its one-way-or-the-other inexistence/reality.
194 Ricochet
January 2nd, 2010 at 1:13 am
While my post is probably too late, this is to Karl and all the other religion apologists. Karl states that without religion we wouldn’t culture, or the arts. Talk about putting the cart before the horse! Religion is the end RESULT of culture and the arts. That fact that much art and thought has purportedly come from religion, the fact of the matter is that art existed long before organized religion, as did storytelling and literature. Religion has forever USED art and culture to propagate their own ideals, nothing more. Religion was the cause of all the wars Karl mentions. The fact that science has allowed mankind to develop more efficient methods of eradicating its cultures of opposition is INDEED not sciences’ fault. And finally, the simplistic statement that you don’t need religion to be against abortion and stem cell research is laughable and so poorly thought out, that it defies a logical response.
195 francesca
January 2nd, 2010 at 1:46 am
you think that man has reached his maximum but you are wrong I think in 10 years we will be like mother nature in what concerne our body!!!!!!!!!
196 mahala
January 2nd, 2010 at 4:23 am
i say TELEPORTATION! and time travel.
and government departments and professional counseling for the dead (ghosts).
197 segues
January 2nd, 2010 at 5:01 am
@crispin (190): Yes, crispin. That is what has attacked my entire spinal cord. That’s why I am so interested in Nanotechnology. I’m a walking pharmacopeia now, and Id love to be free of that. I see my Pain Management doctor once a month, my Neurologist every other month.
I want freedom!
198 Mike
January 2nd, 2010 at 8:16 am
Human beings using a Time Machine…what could possibly go wrong here?
199 rainbowcloud33
January 2nd, 2010 at 10:14 pm
A space elevator-type contraption was used in William Gibson’s book Neuromancer. It was really more like a bullet train to space, but hey, sounds cool! I didn’t realize people seriously consider it.
200 Jeremy
January 2nd, 2010 at 11:22 pm
What a ridiculous list indeed. I laughed my ass off. The author has no idea about science at all. My daughter is 12 years old and even she laughed about it.
201 Jeremy
January 2nd, 2010 at 11:28 pm
I mean this are all legitimate achievements (more or less), but surely not the “Top 10 Scientific Achievements We Are Waiting For” except maybe the breakthrough in cancer therapy…
202 medstudent
January 2nd, 2010 at 11:46 pm
@segues
You don’t need a breakthrough in nanotechnology. What you need is a cure for schwannomatosis. I think this fits under the category “cure for cancer” much better. Even though schwannomas are benign tumors and not maligne. What I’m saying is – don’t focus on a popular stories pushed up by the media…
203 mandy
January 3rd, 2010 at 2:26 am
Great list! I really likes this one but what about fixing spinal cords so people can walk again and being able to get to the deepest part of the ocean. Who knows what creatures we have yet to discover!
204 Lifeschool
January 3rd, 2010 at 8:41 am
Time Travel and Teleportation….
Read the very LATEST news here:
http://www.examiner.com/x-2912-Seattle-Exopolitics-Examiner~y2009m12d31-Second-whistleblower-emerges-to-confirm-reality-of-time-travel
205 Trazz
January 3rd, 2010 at 9:24 am
this is really a silly, ill conceived list. obviously way out of the depth of the writer. i am surprised that you didnt say that we on the verge of time travel. really, too many people trying way to hard to be “intellectual” and end up sounding trite, contrived and pedantically banal. dont try so hard to be “interesting”, because it ends up…not.
206 segues
January 3rd, 2010 at 10:26 am
@medstudent (204): Thanks for your answer, med, but no one is looking for a cure for schwannomatosis. The very latest percentages of those affected by this disorder is 1:1,7,000,000.
We’re simply not cost effective.
207 mandy
January 4th, 2010 at 5:01 am
@ (207) Trazz
wow, kill joy much?
208 segues
January 4th, 2010 at 8:49 am
@crispin (172): Little?
209 l to the t
January 4th, 2010 at 6:14 pm
Privatization of space programs scares me. It pretty much means that any discoveries made do not have to be released to the general public after six months of being discovered (if not at all). It has always been this way.
Now if you have a commercialized space program *Hmph* well.. that’d be something.
210 uninsane
January 4th, 2010 at 9:27 pm
Love it….BEST LIST EVER
But I do think you need to add in human brain to computer interfaces.
211 Choosilicious
January 5th, 2010 at 12:41 am
The light at no. 3 shows where an American man’s pride, love and dignity is.
212 archangel
January 5th, 2010 at 4:19 am
Oooh fantastic list! I’d like to see all these be discovered in my lifetime!
213 chaos1111
January 5th, 2010 at 4:50 am
I really liked this list, I hope one day they can find a cure for all the most harmful desieses (AIDS, Cancer) and all the more common ones(asthma, eczema)
=D
214 Denzell
January 5th, 2010 at 5:11 am
@Choosilicious (213): lol!
215 Mike26
January 7th, 2010 at 2:41 am
Finding #3 would solve the other items on the list and anything else. Given humans could put the knowledge to appropriate use.
216 SB
January 7th, 2010 at 5:56 pm
Theory Of Everything [E8]
Physicist and surfer Garrett Lisi presents a controversial new model of the universe that — just maybe — answers all the big questions. If nothing else, it’s the most beautiful 8-dimensional model of elementary particles and forces you’ve ever seen.
http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/garrett_lisi_on_his_theory_of_everything.html
217 Razi
January 8th, 2010 at 10:01 pm
Time travel is chaotic, no one must be able to tamper with the forces of the universe, not even a race as intelligent as man.
218 Problematique
January 8th, 2010 at 10:54 pm
HIGGS BOSON! or finding extra dimensions. Proving black holes exist! oh god, so many necessary things we are waiting to discover to continue understanding the universe, and yet they list head transplants.
219 Ginger
January 10th, 2010 at 2:01 pm
Theory of Everything:
It looks like the centre of the universe is God’s penis?
220 Mrs. Antichrist
January 12th, 2010 at 3:46 pm
Unless the theory of everything is hidden in the Earth’s core, I can’t see why journeying into the centre of the planet even warrants being part of this list, let alone in the #1 spot.
221 muzli
January 14th, 2010 at 2:57 am
Cure for AIDS ! Or is there one? Some conspiracy theories suggest that there is one, or two, somewhere in the world.
222 littleheadspin
January 23rd, 2010 at 2:22 pm
@ Kibley (30)
“@dbrownl (23): A cure for cancer? We can make new people easily and cheaply. Putting shit into space easily and cheaply requires a space elevator”
Yes you ignorant ****! What about people like me who have just been diagnosed with cancer? when i have been healthy and active all my life. Who needs a bloody elevator if you die of cancer?. Cancer should be number one without question
223 CandJ
January 23rd, 2010 at 2:29 pm
I agree with littleheadspin#222,I’ve been through Cancer(and am always aware,it could return),Cancer is a matter of life or death,it SHOULD take top priority.
224 DontTalkShit
January 28th, 2010 at 1:46 pm
Actually for those morons that have a problem with #1, clearly they don’t understand the current problems in this world today.
i.e. Energy.
The idea is to tap into the centre of the Earth and harness the heat energy that could potentially be used to run boilers that convert water into pressurized steam that would turn turbines. This would solve the fossil fuel and clean energy problem.
My problem with it though is, by deliberately extracting heat from the centre when it has remained there is surely to cause other problems such as affecting the magnetic field which is caused by heat currents magnetizing the iron core.
BUT I think the heat extraction required would be so minimal that it may not have a major impact on everything.
My two cents.
225 ho
April 22nd, 2010 at 8:45 am
The answer to item 3 is 42
226 Dave
April 29th, 2010 at 3:54 am
I would like to add “FTL Engine” to the list.
Only with a Faster Than Light engine can we build super-sized space crafts and explore space beyond the solar system, gathering resources and hopefully establishing colonies, ensuring humanity will survive even if the Earth is destroyed.
Such an engine is hard to build, first of all because we have no idea how to achieve such a speed, and second because it would need a tremendous amount of energy to function.
227 markmbha
June 6th, 2010 at 8:16 pm
Most of these ideas are not practical, and will never be completed. A few are within our grasp now; we have the technology to complete them. They will be very expensive though.
228 blimbaam
July 5th, 2010 at 4:15 pm
I believe that im finding a metal/material that super conducts at room temperature, we have a solution to all our energy needs
229 Alisha
July 27th, 2010 at 5:47 pm
This makes me want to freeze myself, and come back when these things have happened