Today’s weapons of war are increasingly geared towards felling an enemy in as humane a way as possible, with high velocity firearms ensuring a quick death. Soldiers are also trained to kill enemies quickly and (well, almost) painlessly, with bladed side-arms. However, in times gone by, humane weapons were the last thing warriors were looking to wield. Pain and maximum suffering were the order of the day, and the popularity of a weapon could be measured by its brutality. For good reason, too! A weapon that scared the crap out of your enemy was a useful tool, as well as an empowering asset.
Let’s take a look at some of the more fearsome, and downright nasty, weapons employed by warriors of times gone by. In no particular order (I wouldn’t fancy encountering ANY of these!):

A knobkerrie refers to any blunt impact implement located at the end of a shaft weapon or staff. Usually a small ball of wood or metal, a knobkerrie would be used by being slammed into the nose or groin at close range. This type of weapon has been used in many different incarnations over time, but was originally used in Africa by tribal groups as a means of self defense. This weapon is still used today and can be found on the end of most hunting knives, in the form of a small ball or point of metal at the end of the handle.
Notable appearance: The Knobkerrie is employed by numerous Zulu warriors in the movie “Zulu”.

Most famously used in ninja movies, and the like, a caltrop (or caltrops) are objects with multiple sharp points, designed to be dropped when under pursuit, in order to either catch your pursuer off guard and cause nasty injury to the feet, or to force approaching enemies in to following a certain path as a trap. The primary idea behind these nasty implements is to be used as a trap which will render your foes immobile, or at least in great pain!
Notable appearance: Caltrops appear in a number of James Bond movies as a feature of Bond’s car, dropped from the vehicle to puncture the tires of pursuers.

The mace’s nastier cousin, the morning star, consists of a solid wooden or metal shaft atop which sits (in most designs) a large metal ball adorned with a number of spikes or blades. The morning star was used by infantry and horsemen, alike, in medieval times. The primary method of attack was to simply swing the weapon at your foe. The most common target was, logically, the face or head, although the blow could be directed at the legs or knees in order to disable a foe. Morning stars have returned in different forms since medieval times, and are often confused with the mace, the difference being that a mace has no spikes, instead favoring metal studs. Another form of this weapon is the well-known flail, which incorporates a chain between the shaft and spiked ball, allowing the weapon to be swung harder with less exertion.
Notable appearance: The Cave Troll appearing in The Lord of the Rings books and movies wields a huge Morning Star as his weapon of choice.

Often misidentified as a Glaive, which is actually a pole weapon similar to a pike, a Chakram is akin to a large throwing star (or shuriken). Also known as a war quoit, the weapon is of Indian origin and was usually a large bladed metal disk. Chakrams were used both for throwing, like a Frisbee, or in melee combat, where slashing was the usual method of attack. Another form of the Chakram was the Chakkar, another bladed throwing weapon in the shape of a hoop rather than a disk. Chakkars were used by Sikh warriors, again, as both a throwing and melee weapon. The weapons have a frightening range of up to 100 meters, if well manufactured.
Notable appearance: Xena, in the Xena: Warrior Princess series often uses a Chakram as a throwing weapon.

Similar to a modern sledgehammer, the Maul is a nasty blunt force weapon, initially appearing in use by French citizens. Mauls were not originally used particularly as a weapon, rather as tools, but in time they have been employed by various factions for combat purposes. There is no particular method for using a Maul, aside from striking almost anywhere on the body for severe damage. Common target areas would be (as is common with blunt force weapons) the head, arms or legs. A single blow from a Maul is sufficient to shatter bones and cave in skulls, even when a helmet is worn. The length of the handle allowed for the Maul to be wielded in two hands. A common tactic was to break the legs of the victim with a stout blow to the knees or shins, then finish the poor guy off with an over-head smash to the skull.
Notable appearance: Leatherface in the original Texas Chainsaw Massacre movie, uses a sledgehammer as a Maul to incapacitate one unlucky victim.

Adapted from the common farming tool, war scythes were altered so that the blade pointed straight from the top of the shaft. War scythes were used as both a slashing and a stabbing weapon, their weight and aerodynamic shape making them devastating. Capable of cutting through a metal helmet, the weapon is thought to have originated from use as an improvised weapon by peasants, which was then adapted for military use. Arguably worse than the military form, the version wielded by peasants in revolts would often be blunt from use in farming, meaning the victim was likely to survive numerous slashes before dying.
Notable appearance: The grim reaper, death himself, is usually depicted wielding a scythe type weapon.

This nasty piece of kit was employed by Chinese warriors as a means of ensnaring and immobilizing a victim. The weapon consists of a metal head bearing two or more serrated hooks, attached to a length of rope or chain. Used by “casting” out the head, the aim was to pierce, or snag, a part of the foes body with one of the hooks, and then reel them in for the kill by pulling on the rope. This often resulted in tearing the victim’s body as they struggled to escape. Arterial damage was common and the victim was often killed by the hook itself, before they could be reeled in. The Dragon Beard Hook originates from the Song Dynasty.
Notable appearance: The Mortal Kombat character, Scorpion, uses a weapon similar to a Dragon Beard Hook to drag distant opponents into close range.
![Nunchaku[1]](http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/nunchaku1.jpg?w=400&h=364)
Originating as a tool for threshing crops, nunchaku are an Okinawan weapon consisting of two lengths of wood, or sometimes metal, joined by a chain. The weapon is used by holding onto one of the wooden arms and swinging the other extremely quickly at the victim. The target area would usually be the face or arms, with the aim of breaking bones or causing blunt trauma. Nunchaku come in various flavors, ranging from the basic wooden or metal arms, to arms with attached blades or razors for extra damage. Nunchaku use is considered an art, and a skilled wielder can operate the weapon at such speed, passing from hand to hand, that they could potentially strike a victim a number of times per second. A trained user is also able to “bluff” swings, making it very difficult to defend against, since it is nearly impossible to predict where the blow will come from. Nunchaku can also be used in pairs, with one pair in each hand.
Notable appearance: Almost any martial arts movie!

This weapon lies somewhere between a polearm and an axe (a family of weapons known as poleaxes), consisting of a long pole with a wide axe head attached along the side and tip of the shaft. The Bardiche is of Eastern European and Russian origin. Used as a slashing or cleaving weapon, the weapon was wielded in two hands and swung both horizontally and vertically. Bardiches were often wielded alongside a firearm for use in the event of close-quarters encounters, although weapons of this style were in use long before the arrival of firearms. The power of the weapon came from the weight of the blade, which was usually over 2 feet wide. The method of attack would usually consist of cleaving at the limbs or torso of the foe.
Notable appearance: Bardiche variants are often seen in fantasy and manga stories, often in the form of a giant axe with a short handle running behind the blade.

The only firearm to make this list, the Blunderbuss was an early form of shotgun, using powder and shot. The weapon was muzzle loaded and is identified by the distinctive flared muzzle. The nasty part of the Blunderbuss was actually a flaw in the design, the flared muzzle caused the shot to spread quite widely and reduced the muzzle velocity, meaning that shots outside of very close quarters resulted only in shrapnel wounds rather than death. A blunderbuss could, in theory, be loaded with any kind of shrapnel or shot, small stones or scraps of metal were used as ammunition at times. The gun was used by armies of various nationalities, although the weapon originates from Europe. A smaller, one handed version of the Blunderbuss, called a Dragon, was also used. Wounds sustained from a close range hit from a Blunderbuss would be brutal, potentially blowing away whole chunks of the body.
Notable appearance: Jack Sparrow, of the Pirates of the Caribbean movies, wields a handgun similar to a Dragon, while at least one member of the undead pirate crew seen in the first movie uses a Blunderbuss type firearm.




















Gruesome
i don't know who you are, or where you come from, but for some strange reason, we share the same RL first name, it seems…
holy crap! two Nates on the same planet?!?! I'm totally freaaking out maaan
Great List! I love old weaponry.
I don't really understand the inclusion of nunchucks in this list, they were hardly a weapon of war and against an armored opponent they wouldn't have been effective, if you'd manage to not hit yourself with them first. And where's a halberd, which was probably the most effective close combat weapon? Or, if you want to go for sheer brutality why not include a greatsword, as wielded prominently by Swiss mercenaries? Not a big fan of this list.
You would have to agree though that Bruce Lee was cool with nunchucks?
Of course… But Bruce lee would look cool using pretty much anything
You have to consider the setting for the nunchuku. It was a farming tool that the farmers used against raiding thieves in ancient times. It wasn't primarily a weapon of war. However, with the evolution of nunchuku techniques, a skilled wielder could hold his/her own against a sword.
Try peasant flails. More bruises with less training…
I practice with nunchuks a lot and… all I can say is, it takes LOTS of practice to hit a target with it AND avoid/deflect the incoming recoil of the nunchuck club, unlike in movies where the nunchuck club just goes through, when a nunchuck hits a target, it bounces back, and unless you got your other hand up to catch the recoil or you don't moves your nunchuck away in anticipation, you'll get hurt by recoil. Plus, a lot of the fancy nunchuck spinning tricks wouldn't work too well, other than for show.
It generally seems to work better as a grappling implement, seeing as it's historically, it's an easily concealable weapon that is used as self-defense to deflect other weapon attacks (like sword or spear – it has the advantage of momentum in short distances, making it good at deflecting), then immediately close in on the enemy and use the nunchuck as a means to entangle a limb or strangle (as they may have nunchucks with longer chains at the time).
I doubt they'd use the nunchuck for striking much in the era when nunchucks were fist used as a weapon, since they're up against armored Samurai at the time. Striking with nunchucks seems to be something more modern – a rounded, metal edged variation was used in Filipino Kali/Arnis primarily for striking, and the nunchuck was introduced to Bruce Lee via his (Filipino) student, Dan Inosanto. Bruce Lee then made the nunchucks popular
Is it just me or is the chakram a beautiful and elegant weapon?
Kinda disappointing to see a firearm as number 1, when all the others were melee weapons, but all in all, a very good list, thanks kutuup. This makes me want to play Dynasty Warriors.
"In no particular order"
They are placed randomly.
The morning star is the worsest.
Good list.
They are in no specific order, couldn't make up my mind which I would least like to face
I agree. The inclusion of a gunpowder weapon, no matter what position in the list, just hit me like a punch to the gut.
But to have it appear in the number one spot was just a disappointment. Kind of like abruptly leaving an era.
Maybe that feeling is what it was like for the ancients to realize their old favored weapons of choice had just become obsolete?
Never really cared for war and weapons, but OK and well-written list.
War
what is it good for
Anyways,very well written list.
Could have added more ranged weapons though like the shuriken, the bow and arrow, the crossbow, or even one of the oldest weapons the sling
"War does not determine who is right- only who is left." -Bertrand Russell
I would put Greek fire in the list
Hooray for humans. Aren't we clever?
#1 is a knobkierrie (pronounced kee-ree) not ‘kerrie’. Kerrie means curry. Other than the spelling error – good list!
Just a tidbit, the Zulu knobkierrie/knobkerrie/whatever is called an Iwisa.
boring
Congratulations! Your the first jackass to appear on todays list!
your mom is boring
Arrgghh, the Dragon Beard Hook! Having jagged myself on fishing hooks many times over the years I shudder to think what the Dragon Beard Hook would feel like. The ideas we humans come up with to inflict pain on each other never ceases to amaze. Good list.
The crossbow was so lethal it was banned by the clergy, how is it not on the list?
Also, an episode of Spike channel's 'Deadliest Warrior' would show that half of the weapons on this list would prove to be very ineffective for killing.
i.e. Where's the Katana? Sword of Mars? Gladius? Kilij? Long Bow? etc etc.
"ineffective for killing. "
But VERY effective for mauling and disabling. Isn't a slow bloody death WAY more brutal than an outright one-stroker?
And the list IS titled "brutal" weapons.
If you're going by that logic, you might as well attach a blender to a steel chain and swing it around
Well wouldn't that depend upon the type of blender we are talking about.
If you mean the blender I use to mix my cake batter, I see your point.
If OTOH if you're speaking of the device I use to blend a tasty margarita, then I beg to differ on the appliance's ability to maul and mangle due to the glass container that also houses the blades.
That doesn't preclude the blender's ability to be used as a flailing sledge, but hey, I can get the same effect from wielding my toaster.
In all cases I will assume we are using ELECTRICAL appliances…. in which case I shall dismiss the extraneous use of an attached chain, after all most appliances come pre-equipped with a cord. (Some of which have a convenient built-in cord storage feature that allows me to use my weapon in a much more travel friendly manner.)
But hey that's just me.
the fact that youve given this much thought to the whole matter is part of the reason i like ya —
your post reminds me of that old ass quote from rich needham: "people who are brutally honest get more satisfaction out of the brutality than out of the honesty.”
and, from your first post above,
@deeeziner: ""Isn't a slow bloody death WAY more brutal than an outright one-stroker?""
so its the mental and physical negative reprocussions of being beaten to a bloody pulp with a kitchen-aid that make it so devistating and formidabble.
in fact, i believe ive convinced myself it belongs as an honourable mention ;-o
:):)
Whatever you do, don't try messing with my egg-os.
That was the arbalest, not the crossbow, that got banned by the clergy (or at least banned its use against fellow Christians), due to its ability to easily penetrate a knight's armor.
Oouchh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
awesum original list, fun to read aswell.. what kind of sick bastard invented the morning star haha! also how about knife that splits open once plunged inside the victim? the blunderbus reminds me of the beano comics! top 10 torture devices would be a cool predecessor to this list (wait i think i've read that one here aswell)
Well, I quite like this list, especially wepaons are my kind, but firearms are my favorite, so, where the hell is the patriotic weapon of the five shot crossbow? I thought that thing originated when that thing was loaded five arrows (i mean this is like a cannon, the arrows are a meter in length) and when shot at you and it hits the ground you will have extreme pain (and will die, of course) and you die standing up or in a backward-kneeling position
) but love this list,
Where the hell is the SWORD? isnt it the most famous and brutal weapon in medieval times? along with bros. and cousins SCIMITAR, LONGSWORD, SHAMSHIR, AND DAGGER? holy hell! yeah, a katana and the chakram is kinda cool, but i know one that was used by em natives (i forgot what they were called) that wield shackram-like thingies thats bigger than your mom.
I left swords out since I wanted to go for weapons that are lesser known, an early draft did include Sai and Katana though.
hehe, well, that's quite thoughtful, yes, thoughtful indeed of including weapons that are lesser known and POWERFUL, badass i mean
The enemy deserves pain and purnishment before death. Otherwise what is the point? Great list.
The most brutal historical weapon I’ve known is manured katana. Soldier would rack katanas in a pool of manure overnight, blade side down, so they’d be infected with tetanus and god knows what, then lightly wipe out the manure before apply. When applied, it’d confirm a sure kill whether from the cut or the disease.
And I wouldn’t consider nunchuks as “weapon of war.” Sure, you could break a face with a pair of those, but it’d be totally useless against armored samurais, whose majority wielded katanas or spears.
Nunchaku aren't exactly a weapon of war, I'd agree, but they have been used in warfare, usually by armed civilians, as the article says.
Variations of these weapons are pretty nasty too eg the scythe chariot.
I wonder how the soldier of today would handle having to kill with a morning star instead of the "humane, kill from a distance" weapons used now, especially from a psychological standpoint.
A friend of mine who has been through several missions says that they do not really care how an enemy dies, so long as they die. Because if they're dead, that's one less killing machine they have to worry about.
Thanks for a great list, James/kutuup! Really like the chakram (aesthetically at least); but the morning star looks the most evil to me.
Thanks! The Chakram looks awesome, right? Might have to track one down for my weapons collection
The Morning Star is definitely the nastiest in my opinion, it was at #1 until I couldn't decide how to order the others so I drew then at random from a hat and put them in that way lol
Interesting list. The chakram is an elegant looking weapon, at least in that picture. The only addition I'd suggest is a bucket of burning oil, poured from the castle parapets.
pretty sure there are more elegant and brutal weapons than 'a stick with a ball on top'
or a 'hammer.'
like the crossbow perhaps or even Greek fire was insane and unique!!!
your last senetnce is true — uniqueness/insanity award goes to the greek fire
elegance award may very well go to the crossbow
walking up to someone and beating the ***** out of them with a spikey-ball on top of a stick wins in the brutality category —
when something like a mace has a "nastier" cousin — beware of said cousin
I have, as far as I know, one phobia. It is of being locked in a pitch dark room with someone I can't see who is armed with a razor sharp weapon which he is swing wildly about.
#8, the Morning Star, in it's iron version, new, sharp as a tack, would actually work quite well as the weapon (I had always envisioned long, thin razors).
often in people's fields of expertise, there are a few key points that some experts may not understand in totality
my dad had a doctorate in mathematics, and another in physics — and in all the math classes he took, he never really got a hang of shapes-class — he couldnt even help me with geometry crap.
me? i just dont get phobias.
what i dont get about them is in the definition — irrational fear, being the buzz phrase.
seggie — what youve described is less irrational – and therefore within the realm of my understanding.
now, my sister has always been extremely afraid that an airplane was going to crash into her roof and kill her whilst she slept — and she lives close enough to heathrow that she is uncomfortable at times. — this is more irrational than yours, but less irrational than bugs
i may catch ***** from some people — but i simply do not understand the necessity for "spider warnings". — i understand not liking spiders, but i have never understood not being able to talk about them — i respect oouchan not liking them, but i dont totally get it.
at any rate — im quite sure sometime in the next 3 days, i will wake up panic-y due to "long, thin razors".
Oh! I am sorry that you might catch a dose of my "long, thin razor".
I grew up about a mile from what is now called Hollywood/Burbank Airport, but at the time was Lockheed. One night, when I was a child, a cargo plane did crash a couple blocks from my house, in the fog, taking out an entire block of homes. Even though my brother and I went running over to see what had happened immediately, and again the next day, that incident did not inflict any fear of flying or of planes crashing into my house.
My mother, otoh, became incapacitated regarding aircraft. Years and years later she would not even go drop anyone off at the airport.
The not-really-a-phobia is the result of an extremely vivid migraine hallucination I had at about the age of 14. So, in a way, I experienced it, although in reality, I didn't.
My mind can't tell the difference.
The crossbow was hardly an elegant weapon. It required very little skill compared to the crossbow or other ranged weapons.
Compared to the bow, not the crossbow
can’t edit in the damn mobile version..
i was going with the def. "of a high grade or quality, splendid"
divinci's sketch of a crossbow is on a friend's wall, and it looks splendid — however, i concede the point about difficulty of use.
i actually didnt think of that — but to me, its still elegant — just ineffective and "non-user-friendly", for lack of a better term
how about that liquid fire that greeks used to throw at their enemies during naval batles?
Awesome yet gruesome list!
The double bladed battle ax could come in as a notable mention. Just swing it from side to side…for maximum damage and carnage.
Wasn't the morning star known as the holy sprinkler? Or was that another weapon? Can't remember.
Most clubs with one or more spikes were known as Morningstar, goedendag, or holy water sprinkler.
I know I'd sprinkle a bit of water while shouting "holy" something or other if I was being chased by a morningstar wielding enemy.
2 bladed axes weren’t that common, as the extra weight slowed the attack down, also the standard axe fighting style (overhead chops) made the second blade kind of unnecessary
I could be wrong, but I thought the holy sprinkler was an instrument of torture from the inquisition not a weapon… similar in appearance to the morning star but the end being a hollow ball with holes instead of spikes which was filled with molten lead or hot oil then used to sprinkle its contents onto the victim.
Where is the flamethrower? By far the most brutal way to kill somebody
Not exactly historical enough for the purposes of this list IMHO
Why do I have this sudden urge to play some Diablo 2?
I'm with you there, quite like my halberd.
On the programme a few weeks ago on The History Channel, It showed The Peasants Revolt. And other medieval weapons that peasants used. And it showed the war scythe. It`s thought that a war scythe was used to cut off the Archbishop of Canterburys head. Which has been KEPT, as a sign of respect. And it also showed the nunchukas. They were originally used for farming. Only peasants would get nunchukas, and stick nails in, so they could be deadlier.
The revolting peasants didn’t use nunchucks, they used flails, the agricultural Tool that nunchuks are based on.
Yeah, that`s right. The Guy who Tony Robinson spoke to, said that the flails, and other farming tools, could be used as weapons. The club that they used, was awesome.The bloke on the programme, has also been on Ancient Disoveries. Which is another cool show.
Caltrops were used during the Viet Nam war. As well, coal miners use them during strikes. Work well against modern pneumatic tires of strike-breakers. Thorns make good ones, and a child's jacks can be sharpened.
Great list. I didn't know any of these except the nunchaku (a friend of mine who did Kyokushinkai karate was great at wielding double nunchucks; haven't seen him for a long while, though). But what about balisong (the butterfly knife)?
this list would give any 14yr old boy a wet dream.
The assegai was also used by the Zulu warrior to good effect, it was used by them in the Battle of Blood River in December 1838.
Blood river was hardly a good example of the effectiveness of the assegai. Many thousand dead Zulu one injured Boer and that 'self inflicted' IIRC.
Cheers
Lee
Going a little Mortal Combat on us aren't you
Vlad the Impaler would often get a gigantic wooden stake and shove it up an enemy (still alive) from the bottom, up. Does that count as a brutal historical weapon?
I doubt that the vlachs would actually wait and place the stakes tip right exactly in the anus. “yo vlad retract the pole dude. You’re aiming from the prostate”. “Cant help it man. This guy is old and his prostate is HUGE”
The good old Impaler would get a long pole, stick it in the ground, and then the person would have his/her backside stuck on the pole, and it would slowly go through their body, until it came out of their mouth. Vlad didn`t stand there, and wait until it came out of him/her, he`d wait for it. It took days for it to happen. What sort of man does something like that?! I know he brought law and order, but for Gods sake.
Hey bucket what say you about the Dragon Bone Smasher?
The Dragon Bone Smasher would probably be a good canidate for this list? A blunt instrument that is as large as you are. But, I don't think it is historical though? Also, its more of a one hit kill thing. I think the Mokoto might work because it would make you bleed to death.
The Dragon Bone Smasher is still considered a blade but, blacksmiths joke that its a blunt because of its immense size!
It looks like a giganic bone… what else are we supposed to think? Though its thin as a strip of paper…
More like a brutal historical torture device…
My husband is a mechanic and has a sledgehammer he has named "The Negotiator", because it makes a hard situation go his way.
* * * * *
As a Navy brat I spent time in the Philippines, and it seemed like all the cool people my family knew had a plaque made by local artisans which showed a selection of about 20 of the world's meanest looking swords and other native weaponry.
Each tiny scimitar and barbed spear was scary and had multiple points on which to pierce flesh, and I thought that If I had all those miniature weapons, Barbie would be the baddest assed ***** in town.
Yeah Ken…Bow down and hail BadAss Barbie!!!
Sorry, but just look at Hiroshima and I'll say that the "bomb" is the most brutal weapon in history, just for sheer number, but also for extended suffering it causes. Also, Mutually Assured Destruction is pretty brutal.
Don't forget about the arsenal of weapons from the early Middle and South Americans.
Being slashed with a 'sword" edged with multiple shards of razor sharp obsidian couldn't have been a pleasant experience.
And dying a toxic and swift death from the stings of a few air darts laced with poison had to be somewhat humiliating to a beefy warrior.
I used to have an ornumental sword, with Sharks teeth on it. Is that a brutal weapon?
Are you sure your war scythe picture is actually a war scythe? It looks like more of a bill hook to me.
Other than that, excellent list.
Great list. I never heard or saw The Dragon Beard Hook. What an amazing weapon – hook your opponent and drag him in like a fish. I wonder what they used for bait?
Caltrops are the reason I never allowed my kids to own a set of metal jacks. Meeting one of those innocent looking toys during the midnite walk to the kitchen in bare feet only needs to happen once. Marbles are the other weapon used by kids to major effect.
The illustration for the Dragon Beard Hook looks like a trilobite on a string…..or an evil mad scientist's idea of a medieval IUD.
medieval IUD! LOL!
Have you ever stepped on a lego in bare feet? All I can say about that is OUCH!
Yeah…they hurt.
But the pain is counteracted by their awesomeness!!!
Damn that ***** looks like it hurts!
Let’s make more lists like this to inspire young impressionable males to design and create nasty weapons, and more lists about cannibalism and massacre, because our world surely needs more violence.
Yeah! this list has done exactly that to me!!!! i will create a weapon than is able to spew molten metal at people causing pain beyond imagination!!!!!!
Let's thumbs down this comment to inspire old *****es to stop creating nasty comments that imply males are the cause of and enjoy violence.
oh, puh-leaze
Good list, kutuup.
Not a happy, cuddly Sunday morning list, but a good list, nonetheless. I am always interested in any list which can teach teach me some historical fact, and which can, as is true in this case, urge me on to to find out more about the subject…as if I have time!…but I always make time to learn something new.
So, kutuup, thank you!
Thanks! It was fun for me too! It was interesting to research where they all came from.
You forgot the Keris…
Wavy blade dagger held in a pistol grip.
Havik from Mortal Kombat used a Morning Star as a melee weapon also.
He could also rotate his body and do a little spin which would do a small chunk of damage.
he was hilarious alright
I can't remeber if this was correct but didn't he have two moves in which he contorted his body and regenerated a bit of health?
i believe so
I recommend this book if you can find it: http://www.brepols.net/Pages/ShowProduct.aspx?pro…
This list is too Eurocentric.
That's because europeans had the coolest weapons. "Pain and maximum suffering were the order of the day, and the popularity of a weapon could be measured by its brutality." We rule in football, too: Germany took the bronze in the World Cup yesterday, and now it's either Holland or Spain that'll win. Yes, I said FOOTBALL, not soccer. Your American NFL is not football, it's some sort of silly wrestling or rugby with balls removed. Sorry if I hurt your feelings, but that's my opinion on American "football": it's rugby without balls.
As I like to recognize the fact that Soccer IS the ballgame that the rest of the world adheres to, I was enjoying your update on the FIFA standings.
Until you decided to go off on the game that we Americans tend to enjoy.
Wow –turning a good comment into a bad one in 30 words or less…that's brutal.
OK, I'm sorry… maybe I was a bit too harsh.
You know that American football uses a ball, right? You keep saying "with balls removed" and "without balls". Have you seen American football before? There was no need for that comment, it sounds quite ignorant in fact.
Well, since you're asking for a comment… no, that's not a ball what they use in American football. A ball is ROUND by definition, an American "football" is oval. But again, I apologize if my commentary made you pussies cry.
that's not a ball what they use in American football. A ball is ROUND by definition, an American "football" is oval.
It is also, by definition, a “ball”. Sorry. Get over it.
What definition?
According to dictionary.com, a ball can be non-spherical:
1. a spherical *or approximately spherical* body or shape; sphere: He rolled the piece of paper into a ball.
2. a round *or roundish body*, of various sizes and materials, either hollow or solid, for use in games, as baseball, football, tennis, or golf.
…
6. any part of a thing, esp. of the human body, that is rounded *or protuberant*: the ball of the thumb.
And an oval is a plane figure. The ball used in American, Canadian, Gaelic and Australian football, and in rugbies, is 3D, so is an oblate spheroid.
Ohhhh, see I didn't realize that you were just a troll looking for negative attention. Did Daddy forget to snuggle you last night?
Poor kid. There ya go though, ya called Americans pussies, you had your "snuggle" for the night. Now back to bed.
I'm not a troll, at least not all the time. But sometimes even negative attention is fun. I don't *****ing care, you can't reach me, I'm in Europe, and if you could I would still kick your ass! Pussies!
Europeans had the coolest weapons? You ever hear of the Macuahuitl? It's an obsidian tipped combat saw. As in "smack someone with it and then yank it out and cut a piece off of them", and it's covered in jagged bits of volcanic glass. Even if it doesn't kill you, bits break off, can get stuck in the wound (which is ragged and gnarly) and lead to massive infections.
Europe's got nothing on South America.
Also the South Americans added the use of a "throwing stick" when hurtling their spears/javelins.
It was a short stick with a slot that the spear end rested in, used to increase leverage to the throw, increasing distance and force of the strike.
American football incorporates two of our national characteristics: Violence, and committee meetings.
fenda, now I have to disagree with you about one thing here. RUGBY *is* a form of football.
I'll grant you that the NFL football game is utterly bewildering.
Although I'm an American, I did not grow up in a house where the American form of football was ever watched, talked about, or attended. I still have no interest in it. My youngest daughter played on a semi-pro Rugby team, as an adult, for 11 years, front line.
I knew rugby, basketball, baseball, horse racing and boxing. Baseball and basketball are okay for an American girl to know, even to understand, but as to the rest…well…I was a bit of odd man out.
Yes, well… I guess I've made some enemies with my comments about American football… well, if you like that game, you've got the right, who am I to say you don't? I prefer ice hockey and European football, though. I don't practise any of those myself, I've practised shotokan, taekwondo, taido aikido and han moo do. Nowadays I mostly do yoga.
@fendabenda: "Sorry if I hurt your feelings, but that's my opinion on American "football": it's rugby without balls. "
the turn this comment took was strange — what is, and isn't, a ball
am i really the only one who read this as balls=balls
– as in family jewels — as in nuts — as in cojones — as in 'the boys' — rocks — knackers — package — cods — cullions — bolloks — plums — pelottas — the hanging brain — gems
amer. football is rugby without testicles.
that makes more sense –
but perhaps i never thought of looking at it the way some people did — you know — cause of the presence of a *****ing ball on the playing field.
although i am a big raiders fan, and univ. of alabama crimson tide fan, i hope you come make a reply saying you were talking about nads.
In what way? By the time America came into existence as we know it now, none or very few of these weapons were even still around since firearms had become the dominant type of weapon by that time. Furthermore, what does it matter if there are no American weapons in there? Does everything have to involve America? If I made a list about pre 1400's sailing methods, would you complain that it didn't mention America?
How did the Kitten Cannon not make the list?
Number 4 looks like a bad I.U.D. I had in the 80´s, OUCH!
If You're Familiar With Kingdom Hearts, The Character Axel Uses Chakrams, And There's An Enemy Called The Morning Star. It's A Spiked Ball.
I was going to use that as the "Noteable appearance" for Chakrams, but I thought it was a little obscure, apparently KH is more well known than I thought lol
And Donald also gets a wand called The Morning Star which does not look like one at all… or so i'm told
I wouldnt neccessarily say that modern weapons are less cruel then olden ones. The difference is that cruelty had a function in their age and was used as a deterant or enpowerment for their armies, which actually avoided some confrontation.
I would say that most weapons on the list, if used correctly would be human (via shot to the head or jugular) they're slightly more "evil" then modern weapons but then again….
We made frag gernades, explosives, biological weapons, landmines, and undoubtably the most horrific weapon in history the atomic bomb.
If Nukes had been around in The Middle Ages, during The Crusades or The Hundred Years War, England or France, would have used it. Then, the attitude was, "Kill them all, let God sort them out."
#4: GET OVER HERE!!!
wtf? maybe you should watch deadliest warrior some time…
Deadliest Warrior is great. When is it going to be on again? The one I disagred with was when a Maori Warrior beat a Roman Soldier. YEAH. WHATEVER. I like the one where a Waffen-SS beat a Vietcong. One I`d like to see, is Bordacea vs Hilary Clinton.
I'm not sure but they were running a marathon yesterday! ^_^
i disagreed with the results of shaka zulu vs william wallace… most unexpected yet.
Deadliest warrior is such bull*****.
I'm not sure but they were running a marathon yesterday! ^_^
how so?
Watching the World Cup. What was up with the yellow card on deJong? Should that not have been a red?
No, I don't think so, a yellow card was enough. But the bronze match (Germany vs. Uruguay) was way more entertaining than this final so far.
You whats the most annoying thing. Ive a slower tv reception (maybe 1-2 secs slower) and i always had GOOOOOAAAALL shouts before each goal on my tv for the last 5 matches. It really takes out all the thrill out of it. And to top that up. I got goal shouts today even when there werent any goal (probably an over excited guy). It was so confusing.
A good thing maybe: i know what nationalities leave around me. Ive got some uruguayans dutch but most are spanish and germans.
You must live close to your neighbors!
Actually, segues, I watched it again and yes you are right, it should have been a red card. deJong did basically what we karate people call tobi mae geri, ie. jumping front kick to the opponent's chest area. Not allowed in football as far as I know
not much really new to me here but i always love seeing the morning star get some attention.
Spain scored!
Spain won! Damn! Well, congrats!
At least there was ONE Englishman in the final..!
Paul the octopus was right again, then… weird…
How the hell was Paul the Octopus right everytime?! That`s just unreal. Paul even predicted Germany`s defeat to Spain. And you know that after Germany lost to Spain, Paul got death threats? Unreal. It`s like Back To The Future, where Biff knows the result of every sporting event, because Future Biff gave Young Biff that mag. Did you know Paul is English? At least something good comes from this country.
*Breaking News* Paul the octopus admits role in match fixing ring XD
Most of these have a notable appearance in Diablo II.
Congratulations España!
Condolences Netherlands!
Does anyone know, just off hand, when was the last time the World Cup was played for by two European teams?
Yes, the 2006 cup. France vs. Italy
2006 France lost to Italy, Thanks to Zidane!
This is also the second time the Dutch have lost a final to a Euro team, previously Germany 1974.
Cheers
Lee