Throughout the years many people have perpetrated hoaxes – often for publicity, and sometimes just for the hell of it. Of all the hoaxes through history, the ten in this list are the most famous. In at least two cases (the Book of Mormon, and the Priory of Sion) millions of people have been fooled – or continue to be fooled! In no particular order, here they are:
1. The Book of Mormon 1830
The Book of Mormon is considered by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints to be a divinely inspired book of equal value to the Bible. Joseph Smith, founder of the Mormon religion, claimed that he was directed by an Angel to a hill near his home in which he found golden tablets containing the full text of the book. With the books he found two objects called the Urim and Thummim which he described as a pair of crystals joined in the form of a large pair of spectacles. Unfortunately, after Smith finished his translation, he had to return the tablets to the Angel, so there is no physical evidence that they ever existed.
The book refers to a group of Jews that moved to and settled in America where Jesus visited them. Some segments of the Book of Mormon contain sections copied directly from the King James version of the Bible – the Bible that was most popular at the time and used by Joseph Smith. One example is Mark 16:15-18 which is quoted nearly word-for-word in Mormon 9:22-24. In addition, the book mimics the literary and linguistic style of the King James Bible. Linguistic experts have stated that the entire book is written by one man, and is not written by a combination of authors (the prophets as claimed by Smith). Additionally, the book refers to animals and crops that did not exist in America until Columbus arrived: ass, bull, calf, cattle, cow, domestic goat, horse, ox, domestic sheep, sow, swine, elephants, wheat, and barley.
The most compelling proof that Joseph Smith was perpetuating a fraud is the Book of Abraham. In 1835 Smith was able to use his Urim and Thummim to translate some Egyptian scrolls that he was given access to (at that time no one could read hieroglyphics). Upon inspection, Smith declared that they contained the Book of Abraham. He promptly translated the lot and it was accepted as scripture by the church. The scrolls vanished and everyone thought the story would end there. But it didn’t – in 1966 the original scrolls were found in the New York Metropolitan Museum of Art. The scrolls turned out to be a standard Egyptian text that was often buried with the dead. To this day the Book of Abraham is a source of discomfort for the Mormon religion.
2. The Cottingley Fairies 1917
The Cottingley Fairies are a series of five photographs taken by Elsie Wright and Frances Griffiths, two young cousins living in Cottingley, near Bradford, England, depicting the two in various activities with supposed fairies. Elsie was the daughter of Arthur Wright, one of the earliest qualified electrical engineers. She borrowed her father’s quarter plate camera and took photos in the beck behind the family house. When Mr. Wright, upon developing the plates, saw fairies in the pictures, he considered them fake. After the taking of the second picture, he banned Elsie from using the camera again. Her mother, Polly, however was convinced of their authenticity.
In the summer of 1919, the matter became public and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (author of Sherlock Holmes) wrote an article for a leading magazine claiming that they were authentic. Not everyone was taken in by the fraud, as this statement from a leading Doctor at the time attests:
“On the evidence I have no hesitation in saying that these photographs could have been `faked’. I criticise the attitude of those who declared there is something supernatural in the circumstances attending to the taking of these pictures because, as a medical man, I believe that the inculcation of such absurd ideas into the minds of children will result in later life in manifestations and nervous disorder and mental disturbances…”
For fifty years the girls avoided publicity and the hoax continued to be believed by many. In late 1981 and mid 1982 respectively, Frances Way (née Griffiths) and Elsie Hill (née Wright), who took the photographs admitted that the first four pictures were fakes. Speaking of the first photograph in particular, Frances has said: “I don’t see how people could believe they’re real fairies. I could see the backs of them and the hatpins when the photo was being taken.” Both of the girls claimed, right up to their deaths, that the fifth photo was, in fact, authentic.
3. Alien Autopsy 1995
In 1995, Ray Santilli instigated a wide reaching “alien autopsy” controversy when he claimed to possess footage taken in a tent by a U.S. military shortly after the 1947 Roswell UFO incident. Santilli first presented his film to an invited audience of media representatives, UFOlogists and other dignitaries at the Museum of London on 5 May 1995. Although the broadcast version did not show the actual “autopsy”, video editions have the complete and unedited film, plus previously unreleased footage of wreckage presented as the remains of the alien craft reported to have crashed in Roswell. The show features interviews with experts on the authenticity of the film.
On April 4, 2006, two days prior to the UK release of Alien Autopsy Ray Santilli and fellow producer Gary Shoefield announced that their film was only partially real (a “few frames,” in their words), while the rest was a reconstruction of twenty-two rolls of film, averaging four minutes in length, which Santilli had viewed in 1992 but which had subsequently degraded from humidity and heat. According to Santilli, a set was constructed in the living room of an empty flat in Rochester Square, Camden Town, London. John Humphreys, an artist and sculptor, was employed to construct two dummy alien bodies over a period of three weeks, using casts containing sheep brains set in jelly, chicken entrails and knuckle joints.
4. Piltdown Man 1912
The “Piltdown Man” is a famous hoax consisting of fragments of a skull and jawbone collected in 1912 from a gravel pit at Piltdown, a village near Uckfield, East Sussex. The fragments were thought by many experts of the day to be the fossilised remains of a hitherto unknown form of early human. The Latin name Eoanthropus dawsoni (“Dawson’s dawn-man”, after the collector Charles Dawson) was given to the specimen.
The Piltdown hoax is perhaps the most famous archaeological hoax in history. It has been prominent for two reasons: the attention paid to the issue of human evolution, and the length of time (more than 40 years) that elapsed from its discovery to its exposure as a forgery. It was exposed in 1953 as a forgery, consisting of the lower jawbone of an orangutan combined with the skull of a fully developed, modern man. The identity of the Piltdown forger remains unknown, but suspects have included Dawson, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin and Arthur Conan Doyle as well as numerous others.
From the outset, there were scientists who expressed skepticism about the Piltdown find. G.S. Miller, for example, observed in 1915 that “deliberate malice could hardly have been more successful than the hazards of deposition in so breaking the fossils as to give free scope to individual judgment in fitting the parts together.” In the decades prior to its exposure as a forgery in 1953, scientists increasingly regarded Piltdown as an enigmatic aberration inconsistent with the path of hominid evolution as demonstrated by fossils found elsewhere.
5. Feejee Mermaid 1842
The Feejee Mermaid was presented as a mummified body of something, supposedly a creature that was half mammal and half fish (like a grotesque version of normal mermaid stories). The original exhibit was popularized by circus great P.T. Barnum, but has since been copied many times in other attractions, including the collection of famed showman Robert Ripley. The original exhibit was shown around the United States, but was lost in the 1860s when Barnum’s museum caught fire. The exhibit has since been acquired by Harvard University’s Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology and is currently housed in the museum’s attic storage area.
The Fiji mermaid came into Barnum’s possession via his Boston counterpart Moses Kimball, who brought it down to Barnum in late spring of 1842. On June 18, Barnum and Kimball entered into a written agreement to exploit this “curiosity supposed to be a mermaid.” Kimball would remain the creature’s sole owner and Barnum would lease it for $12.50 a week. Barnum christened his artefact “The Feejee Mermaid”.
In reality, the mermaid was a gaff, the work of an Indonesian craftsman using either papier-mâché and materials from exotic fish, or the tail of a fish and a torso of a baby orangutan, stitched together with the head of a monkey
6. The Priory of Sion 1956
The Priory of Sion has been characterized as anything from the most influential secret society in Western history to a modern Rosicrucian-esque group, but, ultimately, has been shown to be a hoax created in 1956 by Pierre Plantard, a pretender to the French throne. The evidence presented in support of its historical existence is not considered authentic or persuasive by established historians, academics, and universities, and the evidence was later discovered to have been forged and then planted in various locations around France by Plantard and his associates.
Between 1961 and 1984 Plantard contrived a mythical pedigree of the Priory of Sion claiming that it was the offshoot of the monastic order housed in the Abbey of Sion, which had been founded in the Kingdom of Jerusalem during the First Crusade and later absorbed by the Jesuits in 1617. Plantard hoped that the Priory of Sion would become an influential cryptopolitical irregular masonic lodge dedicated to the restoration of chivalry and monarchy, which would promote Plantard’s own claim to the throne of France.
The priory recently gained interest again (despite easily obtainable proof that it is a fake) through the publication of the book The Davinci Code which the author, Dan Brown, claims to be fact (proving that he lied outright about his alleged years of research for the book).
7. The Turk 1717
The Turk was a fake chess-playing machine of the late 18th century, promoted as an automaton but later proved to be a hoax. The Turk made its debut in 1770 at Schönbrunn Palace. Its owner, Kempelen addressed the court, presenting what he had built, and began the demonstration of the machine and its parts. With every showing of the Turk, Kempelen began by opening the doors and drawers of the cabinet, allowing members of the audience to inspect the machine. Following this display, Kempelen would announce that the machine was ready for a challenger.
Kempelen would inform the player that the Turk would use the white pieces and have the first move. Between moves the Turk kept its left arm on the cushion. The Turk could nod twice if it threatened its opponent’s queen, and three times upon placing the king in check. If an opponent made an illegal move, the Turk would shake its head, move the piece back and make its own move, thus forcing a forfeit of its opponent’s move. Observers of the Turk would state that the machine played aggressively, and typically beat its opponents within thirty minutes.
The Turk was in fact a mechanical illusion that allowed a human chess master to hide inside and operate the machine. With a skilled operator, the Turk won most of the games played. The apparatus was demonstrated around Europe and the Americas for over 80 years until its destruction by fire in 1854, playing and defeating many challengers including statesmen such as Napoleon Bonaparte and Benjamin Franklin.
8. Loch Ness – the Surgeon’s Photo 1934
One of the most iconic images of Nessie is known as the ‘Surgeon’s Photograph’ which many consider to be good evidence of the monster, although doubts about the photograph’s authenticity were expressed from the beginning. The image was revealed as a hoax in the 1990s. The photographer, a gynecologist named Robert Kenneth Wilson, never claimed it to be a picture of the monster. He merely claimed to have photographed “something in the water”. The photo is often cropped to make the monster seem huge, while the original uncropped shot shows the other end of the loch and the monster in the center.
Just a year before the hoax was revealed, the makers of Discovery Communications’ documentary Loch Ness Discovered did an analysis of the uncropped image and found a white object evident in every version of the photo, implying that it was on the negative. “It seems to be the source of ripples in the water, almost as if the object was towed by something”, the narrator said. “But science cannot rule out it was just a blemish on the negative,” he continued. Additionally, analysis of the full photograph revealed the object to be quite small, only about two to three feet long.
9. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion 1890
The Protocol of the Elders of Zion is a text that purports to describe a Jewish and Masonic plot to achieve world domination. It is one of the most well known and discussed examples of literary forgery. Numerous independent investigations have concluded it to be either a plagiarism or a hoax. The Protocols is widely considered to be the beginning of contemporary conspiracy theory literature, and takes the form of an instruction manual to a new member of the “elders,” describing how they will run the world through control of the media and finance, and replace the traditional social order with one based on mass manipulation.
Continued usage of the Protocols as an antisemitic propaganda tool substantially diminished with the defeat of the Nazis in World War II. It is still frequently quoted and reprinted by some anti-Semitic circles, and is sometimes used as evidence of an alleged Jewish cabal, especially in the Middle East. Elements of the text in the Protocols appears to be plagiarized from an 1864 pamphlet, Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu, written by the French satirist Maurice Joly. Joly’s work attacks the political ambitions of Napoleon III using Machiavelli as a diabolical plotter in Hell as a stand-in for Napoleon’s views.
Interestingly, many of the protocols aims have been achieved. For example: Universal suffrage, wide acceptance of pornography, the spread of Darwinism, Socialism, and Materialism.
10. The Cardiff Giant 1869
The Cardiff Giant, one of the most famous hoaxes in American history, was a 10-foot-tall (3m) “petrified man” uncovered on October 16, 1869 by workers digging a well behind the barn of William C. “Stub” Newell in Cardiff, New York. Both it and an unauthorized copy made by P.T. Barnum are still on display. The Giant was the creation of a New York tobacconist named George Hull. Hull, an atheist, decided to create the giant after an argument with a fundamentalist minister named Mr. Turk about a passage in Genesis that stated that there were giants who once lived on earth.
Hull hired men to carve out a 10-feet-long, 4.5 inches block of gypsum in Fort Dodge, Iowa, telling them it was intended for a monument of Abraham Lincoln in New York. He shipped the block to Chicago, where he hired a German stonecutter to carve it into the likeness of a man and swore him to secrecy. Various stains and acids were used to make the giant appear to be old and weather beaten, and the giant’s surface was beaten with steel knitting needles embedded in a board to simulate pores. When the giant had been buried for a year, Newell hired two men, Gideon Emmons and Henry Nichols, ostensibly to dig a well. When they found the Giant, one of them has been attributed to saying “I declare, some old Indian has been buried here!”.
The giant drew such crowds that showman P.T. Barnum offered $60,000 for a three-month lease of it (in his memoirs he said he wanted to buy it). When the syndicate turned him down he hired a man to covertly model the giant’s shape in wax and create a plaster replica. He put his giant on display in New York, claiming that his was the real giant and the Cardiff Giant was a fake. On February 2, 1870 both giants were revealed as fakes in court. The judge ruled that Barnum could not be sued for calling a fake giant a fake.





























Yeah, the bible says the earth is 6000 years old. And the sun orbits the earth?
No, it doesn’t. You don’t know anything but hate do you. Seriously blow yourself.
The Bible never stated the actual age of the Earth, but over the centuries many have tried to calculate it through THEIR interpretation of the book. The most famous being Archbishop James Usher in the 17th century who “…most famously published a chronology that purported to establish the time and date of the creation as the night preceding Sunday, 23 October 4004 BC, according to the proleptic Julian calendar…” (6000yrs ago). Many Creationism groups believe this. Just a side note: It’s highly believed that Sir Issac Newton was one of the many who tried to calculate the birth of the Earth and came up with… ironically… 4000 BC.
As for the Sun orbiting the Earth, it’s not stated in the Bible but a few verses were interpreted as such by the Catholic Church as being true during the 16th and 17th centuries when Galileo made his “controversial” claim that the Sun was the center of the universe and not the Earth. Meaning the Earth moved when the Bible had stated in Psalm 93:1, Psalm 104:5 and 1 Chronicles 16:30 that it cannot be moved as interpreted by the Catholic Church. The Holy Church didn’t like Galileo much after that. Poor bugger.
I practice Buddhism btw
A man in Greece some 300 BC with his crew measured the earth and came up with some 26,ooo miles in circumference..in the 1950s the earth was measured at around 24,800 feet..not bad for a backward people..
We were talking about the AGE of the Earth, not its size or circumference. Nor was I implying that all people back in the day were idiots, just the ones who believed what they were told by power hungry religious leaders regardless of what scientific evidence was presented to them. There are still people like that today but they number far less than the idiots back when the Holy Church was more powerful than whatever King or Queen ruled at the time.
PS. I think you meant 24,800 MILES not feet. Eratosthenes would be amazed!
big foot video
mix: good addition – did they prove it a hoax?
Good list! one thing though. your knowlege of mormon theology is wrong. for example, yes, joseph did say that the scrolls held the book of abraham. however, those scrolls were destroyed by a mob. the ones on display are the scraps left over. Keep up the good work!
What about the bible or the Qu’ran?
eddy: Bible is tough because half of it is at least 3 thousand years old – and we the Quran was written down after the fact without the use of magic glasses
I am working on a top 10 Christian Sects and their origins though – so that will cover at least reformation and later Christianity.
Besides, jfrater is Catholic and hoaxes are defined as things that don't fool him. The bible wouldn't qualify as a hoax for him.
For rational people however . . .
It’s doesn’t qualify as a hoax either…
jfrater:yea they did prove it to be a fake they guys who shot the video said so on there death bed they did a special on it on the discovery channel
mix: heh typical
I think the Book of Mormon hasn’t been proven a hoax any more than any other religious text.
Christopher: I don’t think it says the earth is 6000 years old – that is a calculation made by modern religious people. Not sure about heliocentricity either – can you quote a verse?
Robert: umm – did you read the item?
people fooling people. what is real?
i vaguely remember the construction of the earth in “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” where workers install fossils into the earth, heh.
Whenever I want a laugh, I read something about PT Barnum. The guy was a hoot and a half. Showman and conman, with a good sense of the ridiculous all mixed up into one. Whenever the word hoax is used, Barnum is the first person I think of.
Christ
Eddy: Whether you believe the bible or not, the text has been corroborated by several independent non-christian sources. While many of these texts don’t refer to Jesus as God or the Messiah, they also don’t deny that he performed the works he did. Most just say he used magic or sorcery. Red the book “The Case for Christ.” It gives a good general picture of how much of at least the New Testament is based on history. And it references several other books if you want to get more in-depth on a specific detail.
Sumerian texts are way older than the bible and it is viewed as fantasy … Hey I guess we are living in a hoax – who is first to laugh ?
The problem is that when something becomes so historical that it loses focus, proof is just not possible. In a way that makes some of these lists easier to write
“In at least two cases (the Book of Mormon, and the Priory of Sion) millions of people have been fooled – or continue to be fooled! ”
~ I noticed the omission of a another religion that was created recently by a single man.
One that likes to sue detractors?
Mark: are talking Scientology? If so, I have done two articles on them already
http://listverse.com/bizarre/top-10-problems-with-scientology/
http://listverse.com/miscellaneous/top-8-levels-of-scientology/
There are a few more big ones you missed:
11. Stonehenge in England
Supposed to have been built by ancient Britons centuries ago, in fact it was created by 19th century entrepreneur, Baron Greville with the intention of attracting tourism to the region. As recently as 2006 a UK opinion poll found that 92 per cent of Britons still believe it to be an ancient structure.
12. Howard Hughes’ biography
In the ’70s author Clifford Irving claimed he had exclusive access to the billionaire Howard Hughes and sold the rights to his biography to a major publisher. It was only when the normally reclusive Hughes surfaced to deny Irving’s claims that the truth was uncovered.
13. Roman numerals
In fact the Romans didn’t have a standard counting system, but adopted different methods at different stages in their history. The system we now know as Roman numerals was actually devised by Lithuanian monk, Irma Ferhar in the 12th century
14. Picture postcards
Probably one of the biggest hoaxes to be perpetrated upon holidaymakers is the idea that anyone is interested in what you did on your holiday, or that you should waste valuable holiday time writing about it, or that you should stress yourself before your holiday making sure you have the addresses of all your friends and relatives.
15. Australia
Cartographers drawing up the first maps of Australia were shocked to discover that its shape closely resembles an embarrassing part of the human anatomy. To spare the blushes of the then somewhat straitlaced society they slightly stretched and distorted the actual shape. Although we live in less prudish times the hoax continues today giving rise to occasional misjudgements by sailors and airline pilots.
16. Musical scales
For centuries musicians have been hoaxing non musicians by making them believe there are more scales than there actually are. For example C flat major is exactly the same scale as B major, D flat major is exactly the same as C sharp major and F sharp major is identical to G flat major, but you won’t find many musicians owning up to this.
17. Icelandic
As anyone who has ever visited Iceland or inspected an Icelandic dictionary will quickly discover the native language of Iceland is French. This was a source of embarrassment within the country for years until 1911 when Iceland’s Prime Minister Björn Jónsson decreed that his people spoke ‘Icelandic’, which he claimed was a unique language in its own right. The hoax backfired big time when major French companies withdrew from the country in protest causing significant job losses.
Ok, very funny. But with musical scales, there are many that you do not know about. What about Phrygian on G, Mixolydian o C, or Aeolien on F. Go to a piano and start on a G and and play all the way up to the next G playing only the white keys. That is not major, it is called Mixolydian.
Let’s not forget our minor scales either, of which for each key signature there are three types. As a Music Major, I don’t deny that several scales have 2 names. We recognize the scales as 12, because of the key signature. Transitions in music based on certain scale degrees make it prudent that “enharmonic tones” or notes that have two names, be named as such because of the original key signature on in which the original tone occurs. Btw, I’m a Convert to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. If the Book of Abraham is such an “embarrasment” to the Church, why is it still part of our Standard works of Scripture? The Book of Mormon has NEVER been definitively proven as false. It never will be either, just as the Bible won’t, though we know from historical fact that “books” of the Bible were removed during the Council of Nicea.
@anton
ooook…..
(Apart from 12…)?????????
The Bible is the “Word”!!!! Period! Scientists needs proof for Everything that they cant explain,,,,so they “invented” the “Big Bang” as to how our world came into being
Crazygal: I agree. And it’s interesting because there’s no proof of the “Big Bang.” Stupid scientists…
I think I’d rather believe in a GOD then that a big explosion created the universe.
I believe in the word “god” being either “god” (noun) or “God” (proper noun). Alternatively, get over your inferiority complex?
While I’m not a “Creationist,” I also do not believe in an Exo & Helo creation or in other words, creation out of nothing. Who’s to say that Jehovah of the Old Testament didn’t cause “the Big Bang?” Matter is neither created nor destroyed, it is merely changed. A day to God, is not the same as it is to us. In the original Hebrew text, it was “creative periods” and “In the beginning” has the meaning of “this is where we begin our record.” There are many Hebrew words and phrases that just don’t translate well into English. They did the best they could with the alteratiions that had been made by Monk scribes who couldn’t read and write that well, or didn’t always like the way something sounded. Then there were other forces at play too. I recommend a three part series on how the King James Bible came to be called “The Fires of Faith.” Though it can be found on BYUtv.com, it is not an LDS (Mormon) film. It is quite well researched and very well put together. Anyway, I once heard it said: those who seek to find fault or be offended, they will succeed. “It is impossible to convince someone of something who is suffienciently determined not to believe it.” Richard Dawkins, Rick Santorium, The Taliban, environment killers like BP Oil, repeat drunken drivers, and some idiots in Congress come to mind.
Anton: I am guessing you are posting for a joke, but just so people don’t get confused:
11. Stonehenge is ACTUALLY a prehistoric monument – erected around 2200 BC.

12. Fake Howard Hughes biography: this is true
13. Roman Numerals were used by the romans – check out some monuments in Rome. They grew from the Etruscan numbering system.
14. Postcards: this is more of a conspiracy
15. Australia: we can see it on the globe now – it looks pretty much the same there as it did on every map I have seen of it. Are you talking about a very early map?
16. Musical Scales: I studied music – there are definitely different scales
17. Icelandic is a very ancient language – speakers and readers of Icelandic can still read their ancient books. It has no relation to French at all which is a Romance language. Icelandic is a Germanic language.
you said stonehence instead of stonehenge…
and also, anton…how the hell did you get all of that?
im going to get out of character here really quickly and say that anyone who believes that is a gullible moron
Fruckert: thanks
Crazygal: a fitting name.
Stephen: Interesting you say you would “rather” believe that there was a god than a big bang.. Scared of hard facts? And there is indeed evidence of it, contrary to your beliefs.
And “stupid scientist”???? – you mean those guys who find cures for fatal illnesses, make long distance calls possible, people like that famous “stupid” guy Einstein? Yeah, right, I can see where you are coming from…
Read the God Dillusion by Richard Dawkins if you haven’t already done so..
Book of Mormon is not a hoax. That doesn’t mean it’s true. It is extremely likely Joseph Smith created the Book of Mormon from various references such as the Bible and the Qu’ran, however Smith and his brother both were lynched for their beliefs and there are several million Mormons who believe it’s real. So, it doesn’t seem very “hoax” like.
You’d think that if there was one true god then there would only be ONE religion…and that god its self would punish the morons who changed his original word…..just had to get that off my mind..PS i know i used its self to referance god ..its because we do not know if it is a he, she or something else
James: Really, where is this “evidence” that a big explosion created the galaxy. Did they find a video on YouTube?
If there is no God, then how did things exist in the first place? Atoms and Molecules popped into existence with no cause?
Stephen: Very good point. Evolutionists say that at some unknown time billions of years ago, matter and energy collided to form the beginnings of an ordered universe. The problem with this is that huge, natural energy forces do not cause order. If you set a tornado loose in a trailer park, you will not see the park becoming more organized. If something is struck by lightning, that something is usually destroyed or damaged, not rearranged to be more organized than it was. The second law of thermodynamics goes strictly against the theory of evolution and the Big Bang Theory. It states that everything in the universe is running down, deteriorating, constantly becoming less and less orderly. Evolutionists are then faced with the question: at what point in history did that law of science change? If there was a point when matter was congealing and forming itself into planets and extremely intricate organisms, like humans, over a huge course of time, when did everything suddenly switch and start deteriorating again? They fall back on the concept that with unknown amount of time, anything is possible, but there is to this day no proof of that. That actually sounds more like a fairytale than the concept of Creation. People don’t want to admit that the world just might have been created by an intelligent God because that would therefore mean that we are all accountable to Him. This is just too hard for some people to admit.
The Swiss Spaghetti Harvest of 1957 was the first of its kind, i’m told.
Though you might want to keep it for a future “Top
10 April Fools” list…
The most famous hoax isn’t listed here.
For a Hoax to be real, it must never be discovered.
All listed here are just pretenders to the throne.
The greatest hoax isn’t famous yet, because nobody has uncovered it.
kmuzu: whether something is a hoax or not has no relation to whether people believe it. If a tree falls in a forest and no one hears it fall – it still fell. The fact is that scientific study and time have shown that the book of Mormon is not what Smith claims it was. Therefore, it is a hoax – he intentionally created the book in to tricking people. The only difference is that his hoax has been very successful.
Che: hilarious! Thanks for posting that.
Big fan of the site. Being a fan, I–like many–recognize that there's certain problems inherit in the lists (e.g., subjectivity being presented as fact, little to no evidence supplied for lists), but accept them as part of the site's ethos. I have to respond here though.
Claiming the Book of Mormon as a hoax is irresponsible on many levels. To question its origin is one thing, but to bypass nearly two hundred years of scholarly debate and evidence for and against the document is a hasty generalization.
The bigger concern is the logical fallacies being used to present the case. In the article and the following debates, jfrater and others used Poisoning the Well tactics and ad Hominem (perversely prevalent on chat boards) to weaken others' arguments. In other words, any scholar in favor of the Book of Mormon is obviously an apologist and therefore unreliable. The fallacies continue with Circumstantial ad Hominem and ad Hominem Tu Quoque.
In other words, jfrater presents The Book of Abraham as his main evidence on why the Book of Mormon is a hoax. Yet, the Book of Abraham has nothing in common with the Book of Mormon besides the fact it comes from Joseph Smith. As a modern example, most people respect M. Night Shymalan's first three major films, but the rest have tanked. Using jfrater's evidence, it would be the equivalent of a critic bashing "The Sixth Sense" using a review of "The Happening."
I know this is years old and nobody will read this, but I just wanted the site and users to know that this post is extremely below the quality I've come to expect from listverse. Keep up the good work, lose the hasty generalizations, and stay classy.
P.S. this comment, "Therefore, it is a hoax – he intentionally created the book in to tricking people" could be applied to most politicians if you substitute the "book" with x campaign. In a Post Hoc response, would that mean that all politicians are hoaxes too?
Ii think you should actually talk with a mormon to get mormon facts. Any other way is most likely coming from somebody who is already against the religion or doesnt understand it. Many so called “facts” against the mormon religion are obtained from the media who came up with the lies that they believe Mormons believe. The Mormon religion actually makes perfect sense when you have a full understanding of it. And btw when you call one thing a hoax that i know to be true it is hard to be sure if i can trust your opinion on any of your lists. Stick to the facts you didnt get from wikipedia
China tattler: so true, but it would be a boring list if I wrote only about the top 10 undiscovered hoaxes
Stephen: After aproximately 10 seconds of research on wikipedia I found this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_big_bang#Observational_evidence
To answer your question of how things came about would take too long and nobody really knows for sure.
However just because there is no certain answer as yet does not mean there is a god. Every time science cannot provide an answer religion immediately claims that as eveidence for god. That makes no sense Stephen.
Finally if god did make the universe it poses the more complex question – who made god? To answer a question with something that creates an even bigger question is no way to form an argument.
In time science will find the answer, just as it did about the world being flat. Until then lack of evidence is no proof of god.
“The priory recently gained interest again (despite easily obtainable proof that it is a fake) through the publication of the book The Davinci Code which the author, Dan Brown, claims to be fact (proving that he lied outright about his alleged years of research for the book).”
First of all, he deliberately did not specify which parts were fact or not. He also admitted he put the infamous disclaimer at the front of the book to get people to consider the story presented with a “what-if” frame of mind, not to claim When people asked him later why he’d lied to them, he basically said he was telling a story and people could take it how they wanted. Of course he did research…for story material. He is a novelist. This is a good list. Don’t let cheap editorializing ruin it.
Elle Rayne: in 2003, on CNN, Dan Brown said:
The problem is that the background is not true – the Priory of Sion is a hoax and if he had done his research he would have known that.
There is more information on what he has wrong on the Top 10 Errors of the Da Vinci Code
Hwy, mix, the patterson bigfoot movie hasnt been proven to be a hoax, infact rather the opposite. Noone of Gimli or Patterson has said it was a haox and the only people who officialy claim it is are lying and have all been disproved.
“The problem is that the background is not true – the Priory of Sion is a hoax and if he had done his research he would have known that.”
My point is, he doesn’t CARE it’s a hoax. It makes for good fiction. And he was true to legend. He didn’t say the legend was true. And again, this is part of his tongue-in-cheek humor in putting the disclaimer in front of the book. So, you still can’t say he didn’t do his research, because obviously he read about the Priory to include in his FICTIONAL BOOK. It’s still cheap editorializing.
Elle: I do see your point, but he insists on claiming that it is real and in doing so has deceived a lot of people who believe him. Someone quoted the Da Vinci code on the unsolved mysteries top 10 to prove his point. And what about the other points? Describing Windows overlooking certain areas which you would only think if you had only seen tour guides and not actually been the place? What about the French geography that was completely wrong? There are so many errors. If he told people it was tongue in cheek then fine – but he doesn’t – he insists that it is all factual.
jfrater: It sounds like you have some personal issues with Brown that I can’t help you with.
Elle Rayne: I have never met Dan Brown, so I don’t have any personal issues with him at all. I just take issue with him stating that his book is truth when it isn’t. Frankly, if you think I have issues, so does the New Yorker, and the New York Times
This is the weirdest list ever. Do you have something personal against Mormons? Because that’s the only reason I can see for putting a bunch of things that have been conclusively proven to be hoaxes in with the Book of Mormon, which… may be a hoax or may not be a hoax, but hasn’t been proven either way. The evidence you provide here is completely lacking in anything even vaguely resembling proof. And contains one outright falsehood, seeing as how I’ve never heard of a Mormon being embarrassed about the book of Abraham, they’re still printing it, endorsing it as scripture, and teaching from it. How is that “a source of discomfort”? If you want to convince people that the book is a fake, you might try sticking to facts and not inventing things.
spark: I don’t have anything against Mormons – I do have something against Joseph Smith because he was a trickster. Wouldn’t it be considered an embarrassment because of the fact the Book of Abraham is one of the most commonly pointed out errors of Mormonism? There are millions of pages on the internet dedicated to trying to explain away the realities of the Papyrus to support Smith’s view.
Are you really that retarded! When you don’t know something, you have to go to the Internet. If you don’t know, in this case your not Mormon so you don’t fully know the religion, then shut the F*** up!!!
BTW, the word is “proved” — ‘proven’ is an adjective.
BTW, nobody cares
Now now boys
I don’t know what this has to do with anything, just going to throw it out there….. The only reason Jesus isn’t remembered as the Greatest Magician in History is because the Deck of Cards hadn’t been invented yet.
Miguel, please don’t bore us with your ignorance of acceptable english grammar.
Ok I only have one comment for anyone who references where did matter aka. atoms, proton, neutrons, electrons, ect. come from and that is where did your god come from. Just poof mystical being somehow appears. So believe whatever you want to believe but do not undo your own logic with a stupid idea.
FYI, icelandic, as mentioned in another post, is not french. It is essentially the same language the vikings spoke. However, vikings settled in normandie in france, Which is why its called Normandie. The name refers to men from the north. So, Vikings have connection to france. French has no connection to iceland.
Anthropogenic Global Warming, the biggest hoax of our time.
Bill – I am considering a list related to that. We shall see.
mcp39: exactly!
Michael – indeed. Vikings have connections to most west european countries. They have also found ancient chinese coinage in archaelogical excavations in Denmark. They also traded with Asia.
Makes you think, huh ?
But the one thing about the Vikings that really impresses me is – the Normand kingdom of Sicily.
Amazing.
/Scots
//from Largs : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Largs
///We won – don’t worry about it, it was a long time ago.
////vive l’Europe.
Mark Hoffman deserves a spot on this list. he was able to produce fake historical documents that sold for hundreds of thousands of dollars and fooled even the library of congress. Coincidently, one of his favorite marks was the Mormon Church.
A book called: The Poet and the Murderer chronicles his exploits.
link to book at amazon
you missed the biggest hoax of all…
the holocaust
Michael: I have heard of him – he is a good addition to the list.
and the biggest most dangerous hoax of the 21st century….
The Iranian president said he wants nukes to wipe israel off the map…
total lies and propaganda… this lie is going to start ww3.
Interestingly, many of the protocols aims have been achieved. For example: Universal suffrage, wide acceptance of *****ography, the spread of Darwinism, Socialism, and Materialism.
….
what about the Jewish control of media and finance?
sakul: Considering that Rupert Murdoch owns a huge amount of the media, and he is Australian, I would say that Jewish control of the media is a conspiracy theory.
Rupert Murdoch’s mother was jewish, which, just like my own son… makes him jewish according to the talmud.