[WARNING] This list contains descriptions and images of human experimentation which may cause offense to some readers.] Human experimentation and research ethics evolved over time. On occasion, the subjects of human experimentation have been prisoners, slaves, or even family members. In some notable cases, doctors have performed experiments on themselves when they have been unwilling to risk the lives of others. This is known as self-experimentation. This is a list of the 10 most evil and unethical experiments carried out on humans.

The Stanford prison experiment was a psychological study of human responses to captivity and its behavioral effects on both authorities and inmates in prison. The experiment was conducted in 1971 by a team of researchers led by psychologist Philip Zimbardo at Stanford University. Undergraduate volunteers played the roles of both guards and prisoners living in a mock prison in the basement of the Stanford psychology building.
Prisoners and guards rapidly adapted to their roles, stepping beyond the boundaries of what had been predicted and leading to dangerous and psychologically damaging situations. One-third of the guards were judged to have exhibited “genuine” sadistic tendencies, while many prisoners were emotionally traumatized and two had to be removed from the experiment early. Finally, Zimbardo, alarmed at the increasingly abusive anti-social behavior from his subjects, terminated the entire experiment early.

The Monster Study was a stuttering experiment on 22 orphan children in Davenport, Iowa, in 1939 conducted by Wendell Johnson at the University of Iowa. Johnson chose one of his graduate students, Mary Tudor, to conduct the experiment and he supervised her research. After placing the children in control and experimental groups, Tudor gave positive speech therapy to half of the children, praising the fluency of their speech, and negative speech therapy to the other half, belittling the children for every speech imperfection and telling them they were stutterers. Many of the normal speaking orphan children who received negative therapy in the experiment suffered negative psychological effects and some retained speech problems during the course of their life. Dubbed “The Monster Study” by some of Johnson’s peers who were horrified that he would experiment on orphan children to prove a theory, the experiment was kept hidden for fear Johnson’s reputation would be tarnished in the wake of human experiments conducted by the Nazis during World War II. The University of Iowa publicly apologized for the Monster Study in 2001.

Project 4.1 was the designation for a medical study conducted by the United States of those residents of the Marshall Islands exposed to radioactive fallout from the March 1, 1954 Castle Bravo nuclear test at Bikini Atoll, which had an unexpectedly large yield. For the first decade after the test, the effects were ambiguous and statistically difficult to correlate to radiation exposure: miscarriages and stillbirths among exposed Rongelap women doubled in the first five years after the accident, but then returned to normal; some developmental difficulties and impaired growth appeared in children, but in no clear-cut pattern. In the decades that followed, though, the effects were undeniable. Children began to suffer disproportionately from thyroid cancer (due to exposure to radioiodines), and almost a third of those exposed developed neoplasms by 1974.
As a Department of Energy Committee writing on the human radiation experiments wrote, “It appears to have been almost immediately apparent to the AEC and the Joint Task Force running the Castle series that research on radiation effects could be done in conjunction with the medical treatment of the exposed populations.” The DOE report also concluded that “The dual purpose of what is now a DOE medical program has led to a view by the Marshallese that they were being used as ‘guinea pigs’ in a ‘radiation experiment.’”

Project MKULTRA, or MK-ULTRA, was the code name for a CIA mind-control research program, run by the Office of Scientific Intelligence, that began in the early 1950s and continued at least through the late 1960s. There is much published evidence that the project involved the surreptitious use of many types of drugs, as well as other methodologies, to manipulate individual mental states and to alter brain function.
Experiments included administering LSD to CIA employees, military personnel, doctors, other government agents, prostitutes, mentally ill patients, and members of the general public in order to study their reactions. LSD and other drugs were usually administered without the subject’s knowledge and informed consent, a violation of the Nuremberg Code that the U.S. agreed to follow after WWII.
Efforts to “recruit” subjects were often illegal, even discounting the fact that drugs were being administered (though actual use of LSD, for example, was legal in the United States until October 6, 1966). In Operation Midnight Climax, the CIA set up several brothels to obtain a selection of men who would be too embarrassed to talk about the events. The men were dosed with LSD, and the brothels were equipped with one-way mirrors and the “sessions” were filmed for later viewing and study.
In 1973, CIA Director Richard Helms ordered all MKULTRA files destroyed. Pursuant to this order, most CIA documents regarding the project were destroyed, making a full investigation of MKULTRA virtually impossible.

South Africa’s apartheid army forced white lesbian and gay soldiers to undergo ‘sex-change’ operations in the 1970′s and the 1980′s, and submitted many to chemical castration, electric shock, and other unethical medical experiments. Although the exact number is not known, former apartheid army surgeons estimate that as many as 900 forced ‘sexual reassignment’ operations may have been performed between 1971 and 1989 at military hospitals, as part of a top-secret program to root out homosexuality from the service.
Army psychiatrists aided by chaplains aggressively ferreted out suspected homosexuals from the armed forces, sending them discretely to military psychiatric units, chiefly ward 22 of 1 Military Hospital at Voortrekkerhoogte, near Pretoria. Those who could not be ‘cured’ with drugs, aversion shock therapy, hormone treatment, and other radical ‘psychiatric’ means were chemically castrated or given sex-change operations.
Although several cases of lesbian soldiers abused have been documented so far—including one botched sex-change operation—most of the victims appear to have been young, 16 to 24-year-old white males drafted into the apartheid army.
Dr. Aubrey Levin (the head of the study) is now Clinical Professor in the Department of Psychiatry (Forensic Division) at the University of Calgary’s Medical School. He is also in private practice, as a member in good standing of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta.

There have been many reports of North Korean human experimentation. These reports show human rights abuses similar to those of Nazi and Japanese human experimentation in World War II. These allegations of human rights abuses are denied by the North Korean government, who claim that all prisoners in North Korea are humanely treated.
One former North Korean woman prisoner tells how 50 healthy women prisoners were selected and given poisoned cabbage leaves, which all the women had to eat despite cries of distress from those who had already eaten. All 50 were dead after 20 minutes of vomiting blood and anal bleeding. Refusing to eat would have meant reprisals against them and their families.
Kwon Hyok, a former prison Head of Security at Camp 22, described laboratories equipped respectively for poison gas, suffocation gas and blood experiments, in which 3 or 4 people, normally a family, are the experimental subjects. After undergoing medical checks, the chambers are sealed and poison is injected through a tube, while “scientists” observe from above through glass. Kwon Hyok claims to have watched one family of 2 parents, a son and a daughter die from suffocating gas, with the parents trying to save the children using mouth-to-mouth resuscitation for as long as they had the strength.

The Poison laboratory of the Soviet secret services, also known as Laboratory 1, Laboratory 12 and “The Chamber”, was a covert poison research and development facility of the Soviet secret police agencies. The Soviets tested a number of deadly poisons on prisoners from the Gulag (“enemies of the people”), including mustard gas, ricin, digitoxin and many others. The goal of the experiments was to find a tasteless, odorless chemical that could not be detected post mortem. Candidate poisons were given to the victims, with a meal or drink, as “medication”.
Finally, a preparation with the desired properties called C-2 was developed. According to witness testimonies, the victim changed physically, became shorter, weakened quickly, became calm and silent and died within fifteen minutes. Mairanovsky brought to the laboratory people of varied physical condition and ages in order to have a more complete picture about the action of each poison.
In addition to human experimentation, Mairanovsky personally executed people with poisons, under the supervision of Pavel Sudoplatov.

The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male was a clinical study, conducted between 1932 and 1972 in Tuskegee, Alabama, in which 399 (plus 201 control group without syphilis) poor — and mostly illiterate — African American sharecroppers were denied treatment for Syphilis.
This study became notorious because it was conducted without due care to its subjects, and led to major changes in how patients are protected in clinical studies. Individuals enrolled in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study did not give informed consent and were not informed of their diagnosis; instead they were told they had “bad blood” and could receive free medical treatment, rides to the clinic, meals and burial insurance in case of death in return for participating. In 1932, when the study started, standard treatments for syphilis were toxic, dangerous, and of questionable effectiveness. Part of the original goal of the study was to determine if patients were better off not being treated with these toxic remedies. For many participants, treatment was intentionally denied. Many patients were lied to and given placebo treatments—in order to observe the fatal progression of the disease.
By the end of the study, only 74 of the test subjects were still alive. Twenty-eight of the men had died directly of syphilis, 100 were dead of related complications, 40 of their wives had been infected, and 19 of their children had been born with congenital syphilis.

Unit 731 was a covert biological and chemical warfare research and development unit of the Imperial Japanese Army that undertook lethal human experimentation during the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945) and World War II. It was responsible for some of the most notorious war crimes carried out by Japanese personnel.
Some of the numerous atrocities committed by the commander Shiro Ishii and others under his command in Unit 731 include: vivisection of living people (including pregnant women who were impregnated by the doctors), prisoners had limbs amputated and reattached to other parts of their body, some prisoners had parts of their bodies frozen and thawed to study the resulting untreated gangrene. Humans were also used as living test cases for grenades and flame throwers. Prisoners were injected with strains of diseases, disguised as vaccinations, to study their effects. To study the effects of untreated venereal diseases, male and female prisoners were deliberately infected with syphilis and gonorrhea via rape, then studied. A complete list of these horrors can be found here.
Having been granted immunity by the American Occupation Authorities at the end of the war, Ishii never spent any time in jail for his crimes and died at the age of 67 of throat cancer.

Nazi human experimentation was medical experimentation on large numbers of people by the German Nazi regime in its concentration camps during World War II. At Auschwitz, under the direction of Dr. Eduard Wirths, selected inmates were subjected to various experiments which were supposedly designed to help German military personnel in combat situations, to aid in the recovery of military personnel that had been injured, and to advance the racial ideology backed by the Third Reich.
Experiments on twin children in concentration camps were created to show the similarities and differences in the genetics and eugenics of twins, as well as to see if the human body can be unnaturally manipulated. The central leader of the experiments was Dr. Josef Mengele, who performed experiments on over 1,500 sets of imprisoned twins, of which fewer than 200 individuals survived the studies. Dr. Mengele organized the testing of genetics in twins. The twins were arranged by age and sex and kept in barracks in between the test, which ranged from the injection of different chemicals into the eyes of the twins to see if it would change their colors to literally sewing the twins together in hopes of creating conjoined twins.
In 1942 the Luftwaffe conducted experiments to learn how to treat hypothermia. One study forced subjects to endure a tank of ice water for up to three hours (see image above). Another study placed prisoners naked in the open for several hours with temperatures below freezing. The experimenters assessed different ways of rewarming survivors.
From about July 1942 to about September 1943, experiments to investigate the effectiveness of sulfonamide, a synthetic antimicrobial agent, were conducted at Ravensbrück. Wounds inflicted on the subjects were infected with bacteria such as Streptococcus, gas gangrene, and tetanus. Circulation of blood was interrupted by tying off blood vessels at both ends of the wound to create a condition similar to that of a battlefield wound. Infection was aggravated by forcing wood shavings and ground glass into the wounds. The infection was treated with sulfonamide and other drugs to determine their effectiveness.
This article is licensed under the GFDL because it contains text from Wikipedia.




















1 and 2 are equally horrible but the reason 1 got that spot was probably because it’s more known. The pictures are just straight up CREEPY!!!
Uh, as an indentical twin, that last one didn’t sound too good. (Though none of them really did.)
Here is the official website (written by the Psychologist that lead the study)-before commenting on the validity of it being an “evil” experiment, please read through it-watch the clips and THEN decide. http://www.prisonexp.org/
Psychological torture can be as devistating as physical. And so you know, as is stated on the official site, this is the first study of it’s kind, with 100% willing participants-no one knew the first thing about what the outcome would be. I find it so easy to judge the study/the psychologist without really knowing the full scope-compared to the virtual imprisonment and non-consentual nature of the other experiements on the list, I would consider it to have had DIRE consequences, but I wonder: Is evil dictated by direct careless disregard for human life or simply the outcome of the act itself?
Laura “fivestring63, would you prefer we not try to examine the causes for these atrocities and prevent them from ever recurring? Those who don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Should these people and incidents go unpunished or forgotten?”
No Laura , all I was saying is people saying things like Gw, any Democrat, all religions, or Atheists are the evilist people ever.
I’ll throw one in too. That little squirrel looking thing on “Iceage”. If it wasn’t for him pushing that nut in the ground and splitting the continents in half this would be a peacefull world. What an evil squirrel.
I was *this* close to studying under Dr. Zimbardo at the Pacific Graduate School of Psychology. Not an evil guy by any means; he’s actually rather pleasant. And as evil as the experiment ended up being, the results are to this day regularly cited in most social psychology courses.
#123 Satori, i absolutely agree with you. it seems that people do not count psychological tests as having the same negative consequences as physical.
what about Milgram’s study at Yale in 1961, where he made people think that they were administering debilitating shocks to people, and in come cases that they actually killed someone? Way to mess with someone.
http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Milgram_experiment
Mel: I’ve heard about that experiment!!!! I was so shocked, I couldn’t imagine going through that, I would have been traumatized.
Mel: The craziest thing about the Milgram experiment was that the vast majority of people continued to administer the shocks per the instructions of the experimenter, even after it appeared that the shock recipient had already passed out or died. Interesting to note that compliance went up considerably when the experimenter wore a white lab coat. Just shows how obedient some people are to authority figures. I don’t think it was evil though; no one was actually getting hurt. Unethical? Absolutely. Evil? Eh…I personally don’t think so.
SlickWilly – neither Milgram’s nor Zimbardo’s experiments were evil in their inception, unlike the others on this list, but they both produced horrible effects.
Imagine living the rest of you life thinking that you were capable of killing someone? Because, for one monent, you thought you actually had.
You suddenly realise that the person you thought you were and the person you really are are 2 completely different people, and that can be mind-shattering.
Mel: Yes, but I think it is important to recognize that quality about ourselves and try to prevent anything serious from stemming from that tendency in the future, rather than to live in willfull ignorance and only find out later that we are capable of such things. The results of both experiments were unethical, but extremely useful in diagnosing the human condition. I would say that – in the example of those two specific experiments – that the positive benefits outweigh the negative.
the experiments in this list are gut wrenching.
experiment #6 – So basically, if a man is attracted to another man, let’s turn him into a woman…..then there won’t be any homo*****uality in our army. Fu@#ing brilliant. I cannot believe that the doctor responsible for the forced ***** changes and chemical castrations in South Africa is now a professor in Calgary, Alberta, Canada!!! I wouldn’t mind letting the professor be the lone participant in the recreation of his past experiment.
post #131;
sorry, this was my comment…i didn’t realize that I was logged in as ‘Satori’. It is 2:30am where I am so I’m blamming the hour for my failer to notice. I don’t want to have Satori’s name on my post, just in case someone disagrees or wants to respond.
long time reader, first time caller.
as a buddhist, i am disinclined to see things in what i view as a primitive dichotomy of good and evil. Evil simply does not exist, to me. I have yet to see an example of human behaviour called ‘evil’ I could not qualify through scientific deduction. What it is, is ignorance backed by power. The people doing those experiments were ignorant enough to believe they had the right to, and empowered enough by their surroundings to believe ‘they’ were actually the good guys. They saw themselves as being the good guys. To me- that’s more insane than ‘evil’.
again, being a buddhist, i find the idea of causing animals undue suffering to be terribly ignorant, but it is also ignorant of me and any else who claim so, to deny that in the proper research fields, that testing that occurred has and may in the future, literally save millions of humans.
i don’t place humans over animals, but the truth is also that animals are tested on to advance the fields of animal health. the real quandary to me is how to achieve valid results without ever resorting to subjecting someone against their will as a test subject.
one idea springs to mind: heavily violent criminal offenders; in exchange for good behaviour and willing, informed consent before trial, would it be immoral to offer them incentives (say, extra yard time, or a private tv/computer) to take part in non lethal tests?
i have several friends who took part in end stage testing in toronto and were paid quite well for it and none suffered anything more than a headache for their troubles. but then we are back to the dilemma… it was end stage because any harm would have been detected in the animals previously tested on.
so rather than bicker about dichotomies- why don’t you/we try to pool our creative intellect into finding ways to subvert this paradigm and at the same time still reap the benefits. any suggestions?
bushidoboy; I see no way to eliminate animal testing. Even if convicts were somehow included in the pool for human testing, animal testing must come first. Just because something is innocuous when tested on cell cultures and the like does not make it safe in a living/breathing system.
The difficulty with using convicts in the pool of human test subjects is considerable. Is it truly an informed choice when the subject is incarcerated? What is the compensation? More yard time? Better food? Conjugal visits? I can see coercion becoming a perceived problem if not a real one. Also generally speaking, convicts are not often top of the gene pool; how intelligent do you have to be to provide informed consent?
Sorry, animals are the way to go at least for the foreseeable future and likely well beyond that. Progressing from the test tube to living beings must begin somewhere and Dogs, Bunnies, Chimps, and rats are preferable to humans. I would like to agree that all living things have equal value, but its not true. Even humans are not all of equal value, take a look at the evil men list.
Man! What’s wrong with those people?
Just one point I’d like to make: Evil is subjective.
Other than that, great list. I didn’t know about most of that stuff, and few of the details. It’s really interesting to see what some people are capable of.
what about the milgram experiment and the wave (i dont know if its the real name i just know the book)
Algodon: read comment #126 and subsequent posts
ive been to 7 of the concentration camps used by the nazis, among others Auschwitz. it no longer looked like a concentration camp, but a museum, there are barely any reminders of the horrific things that happened.
nr 2 is worse than 1, placing them as the worst simply because its the nazis is against the purpose of this list.
Abu Ghraib is a vialation of bills the U.S. have signed, but yet, they think they can crap on people that LOOKS suspicious. if you dont want to follow the rules of a game, you shouldnt sign up for it.
romero-
you give zombies like me a bad name
i’ve got twin sisters ? so i think we should be more like dr mengele ! stop animal testing & test on twins ! it’s better for everyone in the long run trust me
Haha sidvee.
My brother and sister are twins and my father is Jewish– our family is orignally from Autria. So when I think of Dr. Mengele, it gives me shivers.
And I disagree with the people who say that #2 is worse than #1. Mengele was as equally bad as the Japanese in Manchuria; many of his base activities were not put up here. He tried to prove that Noma, a disease found among the malnutrition-suffering children in the camps, was caused by genetic inferiority. Here is a quote copied from http://www.wikipedia.org
“Mengele occupied his time with other numerous acts of the most base cruelty, including the dissection of live infants; the castration of boys and men without the use of an anesthetic; and the administering of high-voltage electric shocks to women inmates under the auspices of testing their endurance. On one occasion Mengele even sterilized a group of Polish nuns with an X-ray machine, leaving the celibate women horribly burned.”
I am horrified at 1-5 equally.
I will say that 2, 4, and 5 may be worse out of the sheer volume of the tortured. Many are still suffering the repercussions of Japan’s attacks; they spread the bubonic plague by dropping fleas from low-flying airplanes and isolating disease-causing-bacteria and putting it in bombs to be dropped on villages. They designed a disease that causes open wounds on the legs that fester and never heal; survivors still have them today and many can barely walk.
It was the Japanese in Manchuria who figured out how long it takes for people to die of starvation by forcibly starving Chinese.
They injected horse ***** into people’s kidneys.
They hung people uside-down until they choked.
They put people in centrifuges until they choked.
1 and 2 are both truly horrible. The descriptions of the japanese vivisecting people without anesthesia are truly horrible. To those who say there is not ethical dilemma in using the data from these studies, keep in mind that one reason the director, Shiro Ishii, got of scott free was that the Americans wanted those records. As a result, the progenitor of one of the most appaling cases of mass torture paid no price for his crimes.
@DiscHuker: “why is there no “throw the baby out with the bathwater” reaction to scientific thinking when realities like this are brought to light?”…b/c religious extremists are purposefully working to convert everyone to their path (it’s the explicit mission of Mormons to convert every person on earth), including spending millions of dollars. today’s scientific evildoers? justa coupla freaks in basements. (if only we could relegate the religious equivalents to basements…)
What are you people crying about? We should do more of these experiments. Destructive *****ysis can be very revealing. Science and morals have nothing to do with each other. Besides, many experiments like these are done on animals now so it’s not like this type of research just vanished after WWII.
I’ve linked to this post in my blog
I’ve also linked in my blog post to the Milgram experiment as a related experiment. It seems a lot of these experiments were done for either of a couple of reasons:
a) the belief that the experimenter was superior to the victim
b) scientific query makes it morally right, or at the very least, morally acceptable
c) the victims weren’t seen as human
Make of that what you will.
And what about Nagasaki nuclear experiment? Not bloody enough?
I definitely think you should include the Milgram experiment. It is generally talked about as one of the experiments leading up to the Stanford Prison experiment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment
I was in a replication of it at UCLA in the late ’60s (yes, I gave the subject the highest shock, or so I thought) and later when I found out what was going on it haunted me for years afterward.
Richard: I discussed the Milgram experiment with a couple of people in comments 126-130. While unethical, it hardly qualifies as evil.
The electroshock and sensory-deprivation experiments that Ewen Cameron did for the CIA are particularly deserving of notoriety: Not only did he conduct these without the subjects’ consent (duh), but his work formed the basis for the modern torture techniques used today.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Ewen_Cameron
concerned scientist: you are a completely SICK bastard and perhaps you should cut all your limbs off for scientific revealing purposes and then come back to this website and tell us how it will benefit the good of us all! IDIOT you are!
how bad could number 10 be?
…we talked about this in class as well…it made people who, before the experiment best friends, end up doing worse then killing each other due to the roles they were given…
this experiment was completely and entirely psychologically horrifying.
I think MK-ULTRA has to be the worst. *****ing with a person’s mind is far more harsh than physical torture. Not that I would know, but I can only imagine. And now they’ll use all that info they obtained to control our minds. This can’t happen.
“What are you people crying about? We should do more of these experiments. Destructive *****ysis can be very revealing. Science and morals have nothing to do with each other. Besides, many experiments like these are done on animals now so it’s not like this type of research just vanished after WWII.”
You need to be put down like a dog with rabies. You’re mentally insane. If you want an experiment to go down, you volunteer.
@ concerned scientist:
Alright, then YOU are the volunteer, OK?
THEY FORGOT ONE EXPERIMENT AN THAT WOULD BE AIDS..NOT HIV BUT AIDS ADMINISTERED IN A LAB..TAKE A LOOK AT THIS VIDEO GENIUSES AND COME TO YOUR OWN CONCLUSION..http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDxZ7PX8YGI
AND THEN WATCH THIS..http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edikv0zbAlU
Reverned Wright: No need to shout. And if you’re going to spout conspiracy theories, at least try to spell your own screen name right. It’s hurting your credibility.
thank you SlickWilly. too bad not enough people know that writing in all caps online is considered shouting and therefore in this context quite rude.
Cyn: No problem. I got your back.
Milgram experiments anyone? Sure he discovered the Six Degrees of Separation, but his “Germans are Weak Minded” experiments are kind of sick.
It’s interesting to note the degree to which sociopathic behaviors pervade society. It’s been said that a single person is only capable of viewing a finite number of people as individuals, and all others are classified in bulk by the mind based on their occupation or perceived effect on the person in question. This is the only reason I can imagine that a person would be capable of committing such atrocities against others.. They don’t view them as equals, or even individuals. I’m sure there are those that truly lack the ability to empathize with others.. But I’m equally certain that the majority of abusive individuals simply justify their actions with themselves to soothe the conscience.
# 11. Mom424 – March 14th, 2008 at 5:35 am
Amazing the cruelty human beings are capable of as soon as they adopt a mind-set of superiority. Germans were superior to the Jews, Homo*****uals, and Gypsies that populated the camps. Japanese thought they were superior to everyone. The white doctors in the Tuskeegee Experiment thought themselves superior to the black fellas. (Guarantee it wouldn’t have happened with a bunch of white syphilis victims). Prejudice is Evil.
On a side note, it horrifies me that the dirt bag doctor from South Africa is employed and certified in Canada. I do believe I am going to write some letters. Jamie, could you save me some time, provide me with some sources? Thanks
In a similar way to the way americans perceive the USA as the best country in the world and superior to everyone else, especially the middle east?
good times!
What no one seems to notice is that 5 of the top 10 were conducted by the USA !!
And of the rest we forgave the sins of 3 the top people running the experiments on condition that they turn their results over to us.
Out of the TOP TEN a full FIVE were conducted by the USA.
THINK ABOUT THAT.
ha most of them are nothing compared to what we still do to animals for instance pumping anti freeze into puppies stomachs or filling kittens lungs whith bleach the list goes on and far more relavent information can be gained from human tussue samples besides tousands of people have been killed by drugs proved safe in animal tests so before anyone starts going off on one about how animal experiments are good for people in the long run let me get this clear ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS KILL PEOPLE
There is a good chance the Japanese were far more brutal in their torture techniques than the Nazi’s…Anyone read “Rape of Nanking”?
inhuman gross ew
major fapage alert. fap fap fap.
Read the Red Cross report on detainees.
Horseplay?
Is this horseplay?:
http://www.disgrunt.com/blog/2006/10/31/judge-orders-release-of-abu-ghraib-child-rape-photos/
Ignorant public.
Speaking of the Stanford prison experiment, i highly recommend the book Zimbardo wrote about it, called “The Lucifer Effect”. It gives insight into how ordinary people can commit the atrocious acts that are highlighted in this list.
Hell is right here at earth.
what’s really sad is that this crap is going on in American gulags throughout the world, right now, at this very moment.
it is beyond any shadow of a doubt that the US is experimenting on people everyday with new and old methods of torture, using american psychologists to study the effects.
nothing has changed. it is only hidden better.
MK-ULTRA = free LSD?? Hooray!
… well… the bad thing about it was they didn't know they were getting lsd… just imagine having just taken it w/o realizing it and you start imagining weird things all around you and you don't know why…
just goes to show you. the nature of a lot of people is evilly curious, and just downright sadistic.
do the heaven father stop this human to do harm?
the anser in no
do the heaven father stop this human to attach ader human?
the anser is no
the heaven father have than samting to stop thos evil human to do harm to us no insted he lisen to tham mor than to us he canot becos he dont wont to and if ther one or hor human redy to do harm to us he is reddy to help them do it and than he blan the devil becos he than hem as he is
That is so sad what the Nazi’s did…I am almost embarrassed to be German
If you think about it… The nazis are not the worst: Their [i]intention[/i] was to quicken healing – while others where doing research into how to best-kill-a-man.
@ letface:
Some people were given LSD for 100 days in a row. Do you have any idea what that will do to a person? The American government is an evil institution. Don’t let all these smiling pretty faces fool you.
There are many monsters who have no morals or ethics and decide to conduct tests without care for the subjects being used. Take a look at number 1, without any anesthetics these experiments were conducted on people forced out of their homes, not actual prisoners for having committed crimes. I only speak of number 1 because it is the one I know about the most, there are many others such as the Tuskegee experiments that are also horrendous.
There are many monsters who have no morals or ethics and decide to conduct tests without care for the subjects being used. Take a look at number 1, without any anesthetics these experiments were conducted on people forced out of their homes, not actual prisoners for having committed crimes. I only speak of number 1 because it is the one I know about the most, there are many others such as the Alabama experiments that are also horrendous.