Land mines are controversial because they remain dangerous after the conflict in which they were deployed, killing and injuring civilians and rendering land impassable and unusable for decades. The International Campaign to Ban Landmines has sought to prohibit their use, culminating in the 1997 Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction, known informally as the Ottawa Treaty. The UN estimates that with current technology, it will take nearly 1,100 years to clear all the mines in the world.
Landmine Count: 1 million
The mine problem in Somalia is a result of various internal and regional conflicts over an almost 40-year period, with the first reported occurrence of mine-laying in 1964. Central and southern Somalia are heavily contaminated with mines and unexploded ordnance (UXO). The UN claims that the socioeconomic impact of landmines can be seen in almost every aspect of Somali society: reduced land available for livestock and agricultural production, increased transportation costs, poor performance of rehabilitation and development efforts, loss of life, disabilities, a general lack of security of communities, and obstacles to repatriation and reintegration. Casualties continue to be reported from mines and UXO. The UN also believes, however, that the mine and UXO threat in Somalia is “a finite problem” and one that “given sustained attention,” can be solved in a seven- to ten-year period with adequate resources. Somalia cannot accede to the Mine Ban Treaty because it has been without a central government since the 1991 fall of the government of Siyad Barre.
Landmine Count: 3 million
After almost thirty years of war, Mozambique is one of the poorest countries in Africa. Grain must be imported and the economy depends heavily on foreign aid. Mozambique is faced with desertification, pollution of surface and coastal waters, and severe drought and floods in the central and southern provinces. In addition, much of its farmable land is unusable because of landmines. “Perhaps the most devastating use of land mines was the random dissection of mines in fields and along access paths to stop peasants from producing food,” notes Human Rights Watch Africa in a report entitled “Land Mines and Economic Life”. Mines manufactured in 15 different countries were used by all sides in the fighting, accelerating a devastating famine cycle in the 1980s that sent a huge refugee exodus across the borders with South Africa, Zambia, Tanzania and Malawi. According to Handicap International, an estimated 20 people step on landmines every month in Mozambique. Sixty percent of them die because they lack access to health services. In 1996, Mozambique’s Defense Minister estimated that there were still about 3 million landmines in Mozambique. The devastation caused by mines in Mozambique is striking. In addition to farmable land, power lines, roads, bridges, railroads, and airports, even schools, factories and cattle dip tanks were mined. Wildlife is also threatened by mines: elephants have been found maimed by anti-personnel mines and killed by anti-tank mines. The average life expectancy in Mozambique is about 46 years.
Landmine Count: 3 million
Bosnia-Herzegovina is heavily contaminated with landmines and explosive remnants of war, primarily as a result of the 1992-1995 conflict related to the break-up of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. The mine contamination is generally low density. Mines were used extensively along confrontation lines, which moved frequently. Most minefields are in the zone of separation between the two entities; this is 1,100 kilometers long and up to four kilometers wide. In southern and central Bosnia-Herzegovina, mines were often used randomly, with little record keeping. Some of the affected territory is mountainous or heavily forested, but the fertile agricultural belt in Brčko District is one of the most heavily contaminated areas. Every month landmines kill or injure 30-35 people, 80% of them civilians. The presence of these deadly weapons is hindering reconstruction, severely reducing food production and diverting resources needed to rebuild society. So far, only a small percentage of mine-contaminated land has been cleared according to humanitarian standards. Most minefields remain unmarked.
Landmine Count: 5 million
Kuwait’s history has been filled with stress due to the vast amount of oil found throughout the country. During the Gulf War, Iraq occupied Kuwait from August 1990 until February 1991. The Iraqi troops planted millions of AP and AT mines in the “Kuwait Theater of Military Operations.” Approximately 97.8 percent of Kuwait’s land became mined or UXO affected. Heavily mined areas were the northern cost of Kuwait Bay and the Kuwait-Saudi Arabia border. Immediately after Kuwait’s liberation, the government planned for an integrated mine action program. The duration was 24 months and cost $128 million (U.S.). According to the Landmine Monitor Report, as of April 3, 1999, almost 2 million landmines had been recovered from coastal and desert areas of Kuwait. A mine awareness program was also established to inform civilians about the dangers of landmines.
Landmine Count: 8-10 million
Three decades of war in Cambodia have left scars in many forms throughout the country. Unfortunately, one of the most lasting legacies of the conflicts continues to claim new victims daily. Land mines, laid by the Khmer Rouge, the Heng Samrin and Hun Sen regimes, the Vietnamese, the KPNLF, and the Sihanoukists litter the countryside. In most cases, even the soldiers who planted the mines did not record where they were placed. Now, Cambodia has the one of the highest rates of physical disability of any country in the world. While census data for Cambodia is sketchy, it is generally accepted that more than 40,000 Cambodians have suffered amputations as a result of mine injuries since 1979. That represents an average of nearly forty victims a week for a period of twenty years. While it is believed that no military groups are still deploying mines, the devices are still being used in new and horrible ways: Civilians have used mines to protect property and settle disputes; poachers are reportedly using mines to hunt tigers, which are prized for use in medicines in neighboring Vietnam; and in once incident in 1998, police surrounded a forest with mines in order to capture a murder suspect who had hidden there. He emerged from the forest and stepped on a mine, and was then shot to death by police. At the current rate of progress, it may take as many as 100 years to clear all the mines in Cambodia.
Landmine Count: 10 million
Iraq is severely affected by mines and unexploded ordnance (UXO) as a result of the 1991 Gulf War, the 1980-1988 Iraq-Iran War, two decades of internal conflict, and even World War Two. Landmines and UXO pose a problem in the north, along the Iran-Iraq border, and throughout the central and southern regions of the country. The number of mines planted in Iraq is not known, but it is estimated by the United Nations to be at least 10 million. A recently completed Landmine Impact Survey confirmed that all twenty-five districts in the three provinces (governorates) comprising northern Iraq are mine-affected, and 3,444 distinct areas suspected of mine and/or UXO contamination affect over 148,000 families (more than one in five) living in 1,096 mine-affected communities.
Landmine Count: 10 million
Afghanistan has suffered greatly from war since 1978, and all sides to the various armed conflicts have used antipersonnel mines, particularly Soviet forces and the Afghan government from 1979 to 1992. Landmines have been planted indiscriminately over most of the country. Agricultural farms, grazing areas, irrigation canals, residential areas, roads and footpaths, both in urban and rural areas, are contaminated. Mines are a major obstacle to repatriation, relief, rehabilitation and development activities. Landmines kill or maim an estimated ten to twelve people each day in Afghanistan. It is believed that almost 50 percent of landmine victims die due to lack of medical facilities.
Landmine Count: 10 to 20 million
Estimates of the number of Angolan landmines range between 10 and 20 million, which equates to at least 1 to 2 land mines for every person in the country. U.N. estimates put the number of Angolan amputees resulting from the silent killers at 70,000. For three decades mines were scattered in Angola’s fields, villages, roads, and other unexpected places to intimidate, maim and kill innocent victims. Land mines have a devastating effect upon the environment by restricting the movement of people, deterring farming, disrupting economies, and killing and mutilating many innocent men, women, and children. In 1993 a UN General Resolution moratorium on the sale and export of antipersonnel land mines was passed. However, international consensus has yet to be achieved and Angola’s problem continues unabated.
Landmine Count: 16 million
Landmine and unexploded ordnance (UXO) contamination in west and southwest Iran, particularly the provinces of Kurdistan, Western Azerbaijan, Khuzestan, and Kermanshah, results from the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq conflict. Government officials claim that Iraq planted some 16 million landmines in Iran during the 1980s, contaminating an area of over 42,000 square kilometers. Landmines and UXO are reported to have severely limited agricultural production in the five provinces along the Iraqi border. They also compromise exploitation of oil fields. Mine and UXO contamination has affected historical sites and hindered archeological studies in southwest Iran.
Landmine Count: 23 million
World War II and the Egypt-Israel wars of 1956, 1967, and 1973 have left Egypt a mine-affected country. Egypt often cites a figure of 23 million landmines buried in the country. Egypt’s problem stems from the fact that its land mines are old and hard to locate and were designed for use against tanks, whereas international criticism is generally focused on anti-personnel mines. According to the ministry of defense, mines have hampered human and economic development and have killed and injured thousands of civilians. Seven million mines have been cleared from the western desert in the past 15 years and three million from the Sinai desert. The nomadic people refer to waste tracts of desert minefields as “The Devil’s Garden.”
Contributor: rushfan
Have your say... [Read me first | Top of page, comments]
You must be logged in to post a comment.
























August 12th, 2008 at 3:18 am
Uhhh, list where did you go?
August 12th, 2008 at 3:18 am
I think something is wrong with the page, I only have the first one. even after reloading the browser.
August 12th, 2008 at 3:19 am
The land mines blew up the rest of the page
August 12th, 2008 at 3:24 am
2 Countries With The Most Landmines
August 12th, 2008 at 3:27 am
Only 2 countries are showing — Somalia at #10 and Mozambique at #9.
My money’s on Cambodia for #1.
August 12th, 2008 at 3:27 am
emmstein: yes and clearly Somalia has the most LOL
August 12th, 2008 at 3:28 am
Only two countries could qualify for top 10?
August 12th, 2008 at 3:29 am
henry o: I say Vietnam would be on number 1
August 12th, 2008 at 3:32 am
oops – fixed – sorry. I am having technical problems tonight – most annoying!
August 12th, 2008 at 3:43 am
i think egypt will be no. 1…
August 12th, 2008 at 3:44 am
pankhudi: not even on the list.
August 12th, 2008 at 3:45 am
Jfrater had to defuse the e-landmines.
August 12th, 2008 at 3:48 am
emmstein: yeah, I lost
But I still think Vietnam should have been on the list. Was surprised to see Egypt in the list and that too on number 1. By the way, where is this Bosnia-Herzegovina? Africa?
And yeah, nice work, rushfan.
August 12th, 2008 at 3:51 am
Great List, it makes you think how devestating mines can be. Not only can they seriously maim you, but it also effects travel and economy too.
August 12th, 2008 at 3:54 am
f-ck third world countries
August 12th, 2008 at 3:55 am
Egypt??? I would never have guessed.
Very interesting list, rushfan. What a lovely species we are.
August 12th, 2008 at 4:02 am
“The most important countries producing and stockpiling landmines that have not signed are the People’s Republic of China, India, the United States and Russia.”
Go USA, GO!
August 12th, 2008 at 4:04 am
pankhudi: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosnia_and_Herzegovina
August 12th, 2008 at 4:06 am
Barabas: India has not signed the treaty because it deems landmines necessary to prevent infiltration of Pakistani trained Islamic extremists into Jammu and Kashmir state.
August 12th, 2008 at 4:07 am
stewart: thanks
August 12th, 2008 at 4:14 am
pankhudi:
So what? Dont have any statistics atm but I am sure that more civilians are killed by landmines then actual enemy soldiers.
I think when even countries like Turkey singed the treaty there have to be other ways to prevent that kind of infiltration
.
August 12th, 2008 at 4:25 am
Barabas: I don’t deny that civilians are not killed by mines but I don’t think that a country like India which is not having any internal conflicts will deploy its landmines in a civilian area. Mines are deployed mostly in the rocky area where civilians don’t inhabit.
August 12th, 2008 at 4:30 am
When they first invented landmines they should have though further than the immediate need to blow up humans and vehicles.
They could have built in a device that would deactivate the mines primer after a say five years. Like an acid that would eventually eat though a container and deactivate a connecting component.
Or maybe a hamster on a hamster wheel that after x amounts of turns the land mine deactivates itself?
August 12th, 2008 at 4:48 am
I’ve always wanted to go to Egypt… this makes me want to go a little less =\
August 12th, 2008 at 5:20 am
Gotta love the human race for coming up with new ways to kill indiscriminately… and forget where they put the damn things. There should be an internal law stating that when you’re done with you’re war, you have to pick up your toys afterwards.
August 12th, 2008 at 5:57 am
Sad, 4 of the countries are in Africa, where ZERO landmines are manufactured!
August 12th, 2008 at 6:01 am
Good one Rushfan.
Informative list, Egypt was a surprise I had no idea they had so many.
slipstick @ comment 25. well said.
August 12th, 2008 at 6:04 am
I’m from bosnia. Damn, we can’t be the first in anything
August 12th, 2008 at 6:07 am
The world seems like such a messed up place sometimes
August 12th, 2008 at 6:17 am
Cool list, I agree with Tempyra. That’s humans for you
Anyway, good job rushfan.
August 12th, 2008 at 6:18 am
Oh and I agree with slipstick no.25 Definitely.
August 12th, 2008 at 6:27 am
Very interesting and original list, Rushfan.
Thank you!
August 12th, 2008 at 6:30 am
well done rushfan. amazing that egypt is #1 with most of the leftover mines coming from a conflict 60 years ago.
why should they be banned, though? i go back and forth on the whole idea of “rules of war”. it’s a war for crying out loud. you have decided that whatever the dispute is, it is worthy of picking up arms over. that is like telling two guys in a bar room brawl that they cannot punch in the face, only the body.
August 12th, 2008 at 6:43 am
Let’s do a quick strawpoll this morning:
How many of you think the United States should join the Ottawa Treaty?
dischuker: What if you got into a bar room brawl with a chap and as soon as it began, he went straight for your crotch? Wouldn’t you say there’s an unwritten rule against that?
August 12th, 2008 at 6:44 am
Well I got 10 countries now that are off my vacation list
August 12th, 2008 at 6:47 am
Oh and well done writing this list Rushfan
I am off to cheer myself up by baking and decorating cup cakes
August 12th, 2008 at 6:50 am
From the US Dept. of State website:
In addition, travelers should be aware that landmines have caused many casualties, including deaths of Americans, in Egypt. All travelers should check with local authorities before embarking on off-road travel. Known minefields are not reliably marked by signs, but are sometimes enclosed by barbed wire. After heavy rains, which can cause flooding and the consequent shifting of landmines, travelers should take care driving through build-ups of sand on roadways. Though mines are found in other parts of Egypt, the highest concentrations are in World War II battlefields along the Mediterranean coast west of Alexandria, the Eastern Desert between Cairo and the Suez Canal, and much of the Sinai Peninsula. Travelers are urged to be especially prudent in these areas.
August 12th, 2008 at 6:59 am
obiterdicta: you have to assume that i haven’t already gone for his. in a fight, where personal injury (possibly death if you get hit wrong) is likely, i will do whatever i need to protect myself.
if the US was under attack, where i live, and my government had a great deterrent to the attackers but didn’t use it because there was some “unwritten rule” i would be very disappointed.
and i don’t want to hear that we need to think about the future. if your defense isn’t adequate, you don’t have a future to worry about.
August 12th, 2008 at 7:01 am
while this is an excellent (and in many ways, sad) list, i suspect the 23 mil count for egypt. this number is not an outside assesment, but quite possibly one that was created under the old regime of abdel nasser, well known for his extraordinary propaganda.
it is also important to note that egypt also spread many of the mines found in the sinai as a blockade to israel, so unlike most of the others on this list, they are just cleaning up their own mess.
August 12th, 2008 at 7:08 am
A very sad list.
With one exception, these are among the poorest countries in the world, least able to cope with urgent and long-term medical care for the ongoing injured.
August 12th, 2008 at 7:11 am
Stevenh ~ It was hard to find accurate up to date stats on numbers of landmines. I don’t know if it’s even possible to know exact numbers. Here are UNICEF’s numbers:
http://www.unicef.org/sowc96pk/hidekill.htm
Croatia has 3 million on that list, but they have recently removed the bulk of their landmines. Interestingly, they used rats to find some mines. I’ve also read of using dogs and bees.
August 12th, 2008 at 7:14 am
I’m with diskhucker. There are no rules in love or war. I would fight dirty as hell, fight to win. Whats the point in starting if you can’t finish on top.
August 12th, 2008 at 7:30 am
War sucks…
I can understand some of these:
Hitch was a psycho and his friends could not pick up their stuff, because they lost the War,
Josif Visarionowitch didn’t ever care,
Middle East has vast oil resources.
But why a hell africans (for decades) maim each other down when there’s a pile of sand to fight for?
August 12th, 2008 at 7:36 am
… or maybe the whole african population are actually like fremen from Frank Herbert’s Dune and are collecting tons of pure water underground?
August 12th, 2008 at 7:46 am
I saw a show about landmine removal and we have these huge tank trucks with ball and chain attachments in the front that tear up the land and blow up the mines. Why can’t we send a few of these over and start cleaning up the world?
The technology is there, why don’t we use it to better the world – especially the really poor countries.
August 12th, 2008 at 7:58 am
lebanon?
August 12th, 2008 at 8:01 am
It is estimated that 150,000 landmines of all categories are currently in Lebanon.
http://maic.jmu.edu/journal/5.3/focus/Harald_Wie/Harald_Wie.htm
August 12th, 2008 at 8:03 am
rushfan,
thank you for the source link.
it is also sad to note that there are only 30 countries listed with full or partial moratorium on mine exports (contrast with 204 countries in the olympics).
wouldn’t it be interesting if a country had to sign the ottawa treaty (or some such) prior to participating in international games… not very likely, i suppose.
August 12th, 2008 at 8:10 am
i just noticed that the 30 count is from 1995 – i guess the united nations does not spend much time on keeping their website current
August 12th, 2008 at 8:30 am
rushfan, while this list is very well researched and well written, it is the saddest list we’ve had here in a long time.
Some day, I’d like to find the answer as to why it is we humans find it acceptable not just to kill and maim those other humans, with whose governments our governments happen to be at war, but to contaminate their land as well, so future generations, with whom we have no argument, continue to be maimed or killed by a war long gone.
I can easily understand a fit of rage; a crime of passion; even some wars make sense to me while they are happening. When they are over, they’re over. Leaving killing machines behind means, to me, that hostilities have never ceased. The war, treaties or surrenders aside, continue, and will continue until all of the machines of war have been collected or disarmed.
Sorry about the endless sentence, I was channeling Proust.
August 12th, 2008 at 8:30 am
where is croatia?
August 12th, 2008 at 8:31 am
Fully half of my post did not show up!
August 12th, 2008 at 8:34 am
dischuker: You can certainly make a solid argument in favour of availing yourself of any means necessary to defend your own life. My point was that there *are* unwritten rules in bar room fisticuffs, so your original analogy didn’t really hold water. Whether there *should* be such rules is a different matter.
You are entirely right in the Morganthau-esk sense that when a state’s very survival is at stake, it will likely use whatever weapon is at its disposal to defend its territorial integrity, and its people, regardless of what treaty it has signed on to in the past. Rules of war exist today (mostly of the written variety – see the Geneva Convention) in an attempt to limit the suffering imposed on non-combatants and to prevent the more barbaric aspects of war, and they are based more on reciprocity than on morality: I won’t torture your soldiers because I don’t want to see my own soldiers tortured, I won’t use chemical weapons so long as you don’t use them, etc. Granted, all such niceties may fly out the window when hostilites reach a certain level, but I feel there is some value in knowing that in the smaller regional conflict that we see today, no one will break out the mustard gas.
August 12th, 2008 at 8:44 am
segue: did you leave an HTML tag open? Or use one of these
August 12th, 2008 at 8:46 am
segue: uh, I forgot that I was trying to put an arrow head in there and it wouldn’t work… silly me
There’s a forum topic that explains why the latter parts of people’s comments go missing in the Listverse Discussion part (I started it after experiencing the same problem).
August 12th, 2008 at 8:49 am
dude3: Croatian is next to Hungary, Slovenia, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Serbia, and Montenegro
August 12th, 2008 at 8:50 am
I am not getting anything right on the first go! I meant Croatia, of course…
August 12th, 2008 at 9:05 am
Hmm, I was sure Colombia was going to be in this list, but I was wrong.
Colombia may not have the most landmines, but it does have the most landmine victims per year in the world. The great majority of these victims are civilians living in rural areas, especially children.
Definitely not something to be proud of.
August 12th, 2008 at 9:05 am
dude3 ~ Croatia is successfully removing their landmines.
http://www.landmines.org/programs/croatia/
August 12th, 2008 at 9:06 am
obiter: good point about reciprocity. however, if we ever get in a fight in a bar, you better be wearing a cup, some sort of bite proof clothing, goggles to stop my fingers from gouging your eyes out, and i’ll even do a titty-twister if the opportunity presents itself
.
August 12th, 2008 at 9:07 am
Good job Rushfan. One of many sickening things about my government is their opposition to the Ottawa Treaty. Clinton and Bush dropped the ball on this one, to our everlasting shame.
August 12th, 2008 at 9:18 am
No not egypt! Why egypt, why?!
August 12th, 2008 at 9:24 am
Very interesting list! I had no idea . . .
August 12th, 2008 at 10:00 am
Continuation of #51
I can understand rage, crimes of passion, even some wars make sense to me while they are happening.
When they are over , they’re over. Or should be.
Treaties or surrenders aside, leaving killing machines behind is a continuation of hostilities. Landmines, whether left from WWI, WWII, or any of the more current civil (or not so civil) wars, are a direct continuation of those wars.
At the end of WWI, there was no way, short of well-kept records (and I admit there was precious little time for that), were impossible to find in the aftermath. Likewise, WWII. Today, with advanced sonar tracking, even small objects underground are findable during flyby.
Why isn’t this technology being employed?
Think of the millions of lives it would save, either entirely or by blasting off a limb or two.
Think of the suddenly arable land available for farming, and the decrease in famine.
To remove the landmines would do only good for the people of the affected nations.
To leave them in place is an evil in which every advanced nation shares.
August 12th, 2008 at 10:11 am
Mines are primarily a defensive weapon, usually planted by the side that is losing the conflict.
August 12th, 2008 at 10:20 am
The fact regarding Bosnia is wrong. There are 220 000 suspected mines left in the country (www.bhmac.org) and NOT 3000000, big difference I think. GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT.
August 12th, 2008 at 10:21 am
We don’t live in any of the *top ten*, thank Mercy. But we do happen to live in a landmine, country, Chile.
Luckily the population is low, and the mines were sown where hardly anyone goes, so mutilations are very few and far between. So far as we recall offhand, deaths have been zero.
It all came about over 20 years ago thanks to the evil dictator Pinochet. But wait, before another crime gets pinned to his justifiably blackened name, let’s put a smidgeon of grey into the picture, which historically he never gets.
Argentina was sabre-rattling and threatening to go to war against Chile over possession of a couple of completely uninhabited, treeless, windswept islands at the very tip of the South American subcontinent. War was finally called off literally within an hour or so of its intended start. There is a wonderful, humane, tragi-comic Chilean film about this event called ‘My Best Enemy’. As it happens, The Vatican adjudicated in Chile’s favour. As a further irony, Britain’s victory on the Falklands War also put paid to aggressive intentions by Argentina against Chile over the same issue.
At the same time, Bolivia and Peru, anticipating that Chile would be fully stretched against Argentina way down south, were preparing to invade and attempt to reoccupy the regions of northern Chile lost by them during the Pacific War (1879-1886).
My wife, Anita’s, two brothers, young men at the time, would have been called up as combatants.
Because of armamaments embargoes reulting from Pinochet’s dictatorship, Chile was also weakened technologically. Her fine Hawker Hunters were now obsolete and completely outclassed by the opposition. Chile was also massively outnumbered in manpower by the three opponents combined. So the desperate ad hoc defence strategy was to lay minefields in the border areas of the Atacama desert in the north, and in similar vulnerable stretches of the Magellanic and Patagonian steppe in the south. An only available system of protecting the homeland against perilous outside aggression? If not, what?
We work in the field in Chile. There are certain quite large areas in the south which are still fenced off with skull warning signs, “Danger, minefield”. We cannot explore them.
The north is worse. No mine maps were made. The exact whereabouts of many are unknown. That depends on the long memories of soldiers at the time. Much of the relevant terrain is barren sterile or desertic, and covered with loose material which shifts in the wind, in rare rainstorms and by earth tremors. As a consequance, mines have become displaced. A few years back, a Chilean tourist’s 4WD was blown up in the high desert, and he was injured. Again, there are places we would like to explore for our work, but won’t.
A great deal has been done successfully, and continues to be, by brave Chilean army engineers to clear the mines in both sectors.
Sorry this is such a long post, and over such a minor case with no terribly tragic consequences. We hope it might be of some interest as we are able to relate the entire history of one particular country’s mines, how they came to get placed and the consequences.
Apropos: when we worked in Turkey in the 1960s, we knew about and saw people near the desert border with Syria who had been mutilated by mines. Many lived as beggars in the local towns. The best recommended strategy was always to use your goat and sheep flocks to test the way ahead.
August 12th, 2008 at 10:25 am
Anon: Forgive my ignorance, but why on earth would the Vatican be the decider of a territorial dispute between Chile and Argentina?
August 12th, 2008 at 10:32 am
dischuker: If I ever find myself in a bar with you, I think I’d rather avoid the whole thing by buying you a cold one
August 12th, 2008 at 10:43 am
segue,
I hope my (67) may explain why the issue of mines can, at least on occasions, be far from clear-cut, and may lead to future post-conflict disaster.
In the case of Chile, the problem is internal. Self-evidently, no country which does not suffer from severe and continuous internal ethnic or regional conflict would want to leave its own territory sown with mines. In this case the sheer expediency of providing defence in a desperately short time-span can be seen as the cause.
Anita has just pointed out that there was no obvious strategical reason for laying one particular local sector of mines, which might have been aimed against movements of Pinochet’s political enemies. But that is a fraction of the total, which clearly were for national defence.
August 12th, 2008 at 10:47 am
ads ~ http://www.bhmac.org ~ this site is not in English, so I cannot read it. I’d be interested in reading stats that are more current than the ones I’ve found. I tried very hard to find current accurate stats, so there’s no need to be rude about it.
August 12th, 2008 at 10:54 am
Sorry, didnt mean to come across rude, I’m just fed up of finding lists which are incorrect. The website is in english (just click on British flag in top right corner). If you then click on the “mine situation” on the left hand-side you’ll get all the updated stats. That is a website of the organisation which deals with landmines in Bosnia.
Any chance the list could be updated (i.e. Bosnia being taken off or put in correct position)?
August 12th, 2008 at 10:57 am
Ads- and how do you know yours is right, hmmm?
Great list, Rushfan- the quality and topic I expect from you. You have a great gift at picking socially consciensious lists and writing them well. Thank you.
August 12th, 2008 at 11:04 am
I know that I am right because i got the information from a reliable source. At the state level, Bosnia and Herzegovina Demining Law regulates Demining Commission as a central body responsible for the longterm conduction of mine action activities and removal of mine danger in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Commission is a part of BH Ministry of Civil Affairs.BHMAC is its technical body. And if anyone would know – they would.
Go check it out if you dont believe me. http://www.bhmac.org
August 12th, 2008 at 11:05 am
Ads ~ Thanks for the info, I appreciate it. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I got the impression they were stating those stats as the “strategic plan for the next ten years” not necessarily the current stats.
Cedestra ~ Thank you very much, I appreciate that. I’ve been working on this list since I first discovered this website. As I’ve stated previously, it was hard to find current, up to date statistics as this is an evolving situation with work currently being done to remove mines, plus we’ll probably never know how many mines a country really has, since accurate records are nearly impossible to keep or find.
August 12th, 2008 at 11:11 am
The plan is to have the whole country free of mines by 2019, the estimated number of mines at begining of 2009 (taking into consieration demineing going on at them moment) is 220 000.
August 12th, 2008 at 11:16 am
And one thing, majority of contaminated areas are marked.
August 12th, 2008 at 11:31 am
This is one of those lists that prompted me to search around Internet to get even more info on the subject.
Thanks for a great list rushfan!
For what its worth, I did read that the US does spend more money to clear landmines & help mine accident survivors than any other country. I know the US has not joined the Ottawa Treaty which disappoints me but I was thinking if the US did join that would leave People’s Republic of China, India and Russia that would have the advantage to protect strategic boarders.
August 12th, 2008 at 11:38 am
Tempyra, (68),
Sorry, missed you post until just now, and we are about to go off the air for a good while for technical reasons too.
Answer. The best way to avoid to avoid armed conflict is to appoint a neutral arbitrator or go to law. The case was first taken to the International Court of Justice at The Hague (Anita cannot remember who demanded, but logic would suggest Argentina, since Chile has always held possession. We haven’t got time to research now, sorry.) Argentina refused to accept that verdict, can you imagine (!), and asked for the verdict to be set aside and for the Pope to decide instead (both countries are fundamentally catholic), which they would accept without further argument. Chile gave way (as she often seems to in these matters) and accepted.
The Vatican also favoured Chile. I understand there were still powers within Argentina in favour of going to war, even after that.
Apropos, the entertaining ‘Between Extremes’ by Brian Keenan and John McCarthy, the two journalists imprisoned so long by extremists in the Lebanon, deals with their journey along the length of Chile. In it Keenan bends over backwards to paint Chile as a state with a constantly aggressive attitude towards her passive neighbours. Don’t believe evything journalists write!
August 12th, 2008 at 12:53 pm
we are trying to ban landmines for the same reasons we banned mustard gass and flamethrowers. two words. indiscriminate killing.
August 12th, 2008 at 12:56 pm
Thanks, rushfan, for such a thought-provoking & dismaying list. (Am I right in thinking that your last published list concerned the worst abuses suffered by women? Equally dismaying.)
V surprised to see Egypt at #1; I was sure it would be Cambodia, simply because there are so many amputees there compared to anywhere else I’ve been. The maimed children in particular are heartbreaking. It’s like you’re faced with constant evidence of mankind’s moral bankruptcy.
I’m going to be in Egypt for most of December. I’ll tread carefully.
August 12th, 2008 at 1:01 pm
ciunas: you are right – rushfan also contributed the abuses suffered by women list. Enjoy Egypt and think of me when you are there – I haven’t managed to visit yet and I have wanted to since I was a kid.
August 12th, 2008 at 1:05 pm
stewart: that is an extremely good idea (self-disarming landmines) but I am afraid the people who make them would not be so keen to inflate the prices just for safety – they do make weapons of mass death after all!
August 12th, 2008 at 1:09 pm
interesting list, nice rushfan!
August 12th, 2008 at 1:38 pm
Egypt being number one was a genuine shock :/
August 12th, 2008 at 1:45 pm
Very good Rushfan. It is good to remind us of our failures from time to time. The Ottawa Treaty was championed by Lloyd Axworthy, Canada’s Foreign Minister at the time, and Princess Diana.
DiscHuker, Longball; There are already rules to the conduct of war. How can any agreement that has the potential to lessen civilian casualties be bad? Somehow can’t imagine the USA requiring land mines to protect it’s territory from either Canada or Mexico.
The USA claims to have stopped manufacturing anti-personnel mines since 2004. From what I understand this is the replacement
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/radam.htm
It is sown by bomb and is a combo weapon, contains both anti-personnel and anti-tank munitions. A whole whack of them in a war-head that auto-disperses said mines. With a time delay no-less. Somehow this is better than landmines? Only for the folks deploying them.
August 12th, 2008 at 1:50 pm
that’s shocking to know that egypt is #1. very interesting list.
August 12th, 2008 at 2:46 pm
Great list, although I think an honorable mention should go to my back yard. My dog/bulldozer is soley responsible for dispersing so many landmines that the entire region has been rendered unsuitable for any type of human habitation. You might not lose a limb, but you’ll lose a shoe.
btw – the pic for #10 is awesome on so many levels I had to steal it for some future use.
August 12th, 2008 at 2:55 pm
its not so much that landmines are considered dirty in war like a punch to the nuts would be in a brawl. but they vastly affect the area after the war and even if the two countries succeeded in a truce, innocent people would still be killed over a war that is not taking place. its like the use of agent orange in vietnam. it was effective but it completely decimated the countries natural resources and environment years after the war ‘ended’. These types of things should be banned from war because they are so catastrophic in the long run.
August 12th, 2008 at 3:59 pm
“Somehow this is better than landmines? Only for the folks deploying them.”
Well, yeah…it is a weapon, they are supposed to kill.
It’s always interesting here at the LV!
I think it’s naive to call to ‘ban’ certain weapons form the field of battle. To think that one can simply sign some legislation and somehow limit or end the horrors of a weapon like land mines is a little too Pollyanna.
Land mines are a cost effective way of protecting avenues of attack\approach and denying you enemy strategic terrain…the short of it is, nations (like the US) that can afford to develop time delay detonation munitions will do just that. Realistically, that is the best you can hope for.
The sad fact is, the only time a country will not use a weapon, is when they know the enemy will use the same weapon on them, the the cost would be too great. Which is why you see very few CBRN munitions used. Mutually assured destruction while sad commentary on the nature of humanity, does in fact work, for those of you who experienced the cold war.
Land mines simply do not rise to that level, so I am afraid you will continue to see their use, regardless of any legislative efforts.
August 12th, 2008 at 5:25 pm
89. munro, do you bother to read?
Your points have been raised, and discussed earlier in the posts by a group of posters. You’re a day late and a dollar short.
August 12th, 2008 at 6:04 pm
Hoo-Ray for Population Control
August 12th, 2008 at 6:28 pm
Egypt has the most ! 23m can you believe it ? Sounds like every square feet of that place is planted with explosives!
August 12th, 2008 at 6:45 pm
I have a picture of a man who had his lower leg blown off and I mean Blown Off. His exposed bone is shattered. Like a broken splintered baseball bat. Gruesome and unforgetable.
Think about how much food could be bought instead of landmines. All those starving people. Worse that they cannot farm the available land. They can use convicted murderers to walk the fields. If they live, they get released. If not, well they were on Death Row (or the equivalent) anyway.
August 12th, 2008 at 7:42 pm
Russia isn’t on this list, so I don’t know how many landmines they have there,
but my mom went to a camp as a kid (back in Communist Russia),
where each counselor was in charge of about 40 kids,
and 3 kids went off playing,
and accidentally set of a land mine.
2 of them died and the third was badly injured.
The counselor was blamed and fired for losing track of them.
Land mines suck.
August 12th, 2008 at 8:11 pm
Nice list, very interesting. I would have never guessed Egypt.
August 12th, 2008 at 9:47 pm
EGYPT, What a shame!
August 13th, 2008 at 12:10 am
Hi,
I’m working in demining company in Croatia. Estimated mines left in Croatia aprox. 110 000 and estimated mines left in Bosnia&Herzegovina aprox. 220 000 due to http://www.hcr.hr/hr/minskaSituacija.asp and http://www.bhmac.org/ba/stream.daenet?kat=1
We, in Croatia, cleared most of our minefields in last 15 years but still unfortunate mine accidents happens. Mines and minefields are, very often, located near villages, towns and houses, in gardens, fields, arable areas and around roads. Mines were set in war conditions under enemy fire so, very often, there were no time for writing and drawing mine maps while bullets flying above your head.
Regarding mine-clearing techniques and technologies.
For mine clearing we are using men power; highly skilled deminers full equipped with bullet proof vests and helmets and metal detectors.
Where applicable we are using demining machines. These machines are heavy armored and uses chains with weight to crush mines deeper than 25 cm in soil. Of course these machines we can be used only in arable areas and fields.
In some rare occasion we are using mine detecting dogs (MDD), usually when we find lots of garbage and metal parts where is
difficult to use metal detectors or demining machine.
Other technologies than that are not yet explored very well (rats, bees, tabaco plants etc), not applicable or very expensive for mine production business like some remote deactivation device (I’m very sorry for rudeness but they are all sons of a …).
I’m sorry for my bad english and I hope I explained some things.
August 13th, 2008 at 12:12 am
Btw nice article rushfan
August 13th, 2008 at 12:32 am
Ivan (98),
Brilliant entry. For Heaven’s sake don’t apologise for your English. It’s remarkable. There are other Croatians in LV who put the languages ability of myself and I don’t know how many other other native English speakers here to shame. Could I but speak Serbo-Croat so!!
These sites are full of people who talk and offer opinions or agonising, including me. You are doing something. Admiration unbounded.
August 13th, 2008 at 12:33 am
“Well, yeah…it is a weapon, they are supposed to kill.”
Surprisingly, land mines are not supposed to kill. Land mines is supposed to injure and mutilate enemy soldiers. Why? Because, when land mine kill soldier that’s one man less but when land mine injure soldier then 2 other soldiers needs to carry him to the hospital (ambulance or whatever), so you have 3 soldiers less in first line.
August 13th, 2008 at 12:40 am
Oh noooo, not Egypt!!!
I was planning a vacation to Egyptin this fall. Now, I’m having a major rethink!! TWENTY THREE FRIKKIN MILLION MINES!! WOW!
This list really was an eye-opener (not just because it changed my holiday plans). I had heard about the mines issue before but I never knew that the porblem was this serious. Count me in when campainging against mines.
Great list.
August 13th, 2008 at 12:42 am
Ivan, (101),
I imagine landmines are intended to scare and slow down the enemy, perhaps even more than anything else. I can scarcely imagine how I might feel suddenly finding I was in the middle of a minefield, but I’ve seen enough realistic films (movies) on the subject to begin to have a pretty good idea.
Given detecting apparatus, I’d want it used if I were involved. However, that slows movement so much it seems it can seldom be used in actual battle situations. Avoiding armed conflict is the only sure solution.
August 13th, 2008 at 12:54 am
Correction
‘I was planning a vacation to Egypt this fall’
August 13th, 2008 at 2:01 am
Anon,
Thanks for your explanation(79). I had forgotten how Catholicism is so widespread in South American countries. It still seems odd to me that two countries would willingly choose a religious institution to arbitrate. I guess if both countries were closely aligned with the church then it would make sense to them.
August 13th, 2008 at 2:44 am
Can you please change picture of Bosnia and Herzegovina? It does not tell anything about mines in our country… And why did you put all “nice” pictures to other countries and the worst one for our? such places you can find everywhere…
August 13th, 2008 at 3:30 am
Great list, Egypt is indeed a big surprise.
Lj., don’t worry, if anyone ever goes to BiH, they’re in for a big surprise if they expect to see only dirt (jelda?:)).
I hope JFrater won’t delete this comment if I compliment Ivan on his work (in Croatian):
Face ste nema sta, razminiravanje je jedno od najstrasnijih zanimanja koje mogu zamislit. Pogotovo bez potpore vlade kakvu bi trebali imat. Svaka cast na hrabrosti!
August 13th, 2008 at 4:26 am
Ivan ~ I greatly appreciate your input. You should be very proud of the work you are doing. I did the best I could getting stats together for this list, but apparently I didn’t find current stats for BiH. I found info regarding the progress made in Croatia, but not BiH. Thanks for the links.
Tomo ~ see comment 37 above regarding travel to Egypt. I, myself, would still travel there if given the chance.
August 13th, 2008 at 5:45 am
Rushfan, did you find anything about North and South Korea border? I read somewhere that place is one of the most mine polluted per square meter on world.
BTW, Bosnian MAC web-page, English language: http://www.bhmac.org/en/stream.daenet?kat=19
Croatian mine action centre, English language:
http://www.hcr.hr/en/protuminskoDjelovanje_u_rh_uvod.asp
My recommendation is to follow “Mine situation” link on both pages. There you can find maps with mine field in Croatia and
Bosnia.
Also, follow those links at right bottom side: Mineaction.org, Norwegian People’s Aid, Geneva international centre etc.
For Hannibal: thank you and hvala
August 13th, 2008 at 5:55 am
Ivan ~ Thanks a lot for the links. All I could find on the Koreas states “The ROK government has reported an estimated one million mines are buried in the 151-mile Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) along the North-South Korean border.” Once you get to one to three million mines, there are actually quite a few countries in that range, so it turns out I should have maybe left off BiH and probably added the Korean DMZ to the end.
August 13th, 2008 at 6:49 am
Maybe not Rushfan. The DMZ is not in a spot where they are going to be detonated by accident. Not a place civilians are likely to wander. The minefields of the DMZ are often cited as the main reason Clinton would not endorse The Ottawa Treaty.
August 13th, 2008 at 7:03 am
I am living about 50 km from the DMZ. So far as I know, all the landmines in Korea are concentrated there, and not anywhere else. There was no warning from the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs about landmines. As Mom said, no-one is going to wander there by mistake.
Interestingly, the DMZ is the last major tract of open land left in Korea. Possibly there are species there that are no longer found anywhere else in Korea, or even Asia. If (when) there is reunification, management of the DMZ is going to be a major priority, but that will leave a permanent zone across the country. I had a discussion about this with my advanced students last year or very early this year.
August 13th, 2008 at 7:24 am
Lecter,
my (100):
“Brilliant entry. For Heaven’s sake don’t apologise for your English. It’s remarkable. There are other Croatians in LV who put the languages ability of myself and I don’t know how many other other native English speakers here to shame. Could I but speak Serbo-Croat so!!!”
Since we are both here, I hope you would already be aware that was intended for yourself as well. I welcomed the opportunity to post the point here, as you would probably have rejected it as patronising in the other context.
Good to find us in agreement here (as we certainly would be over much else). How could it be otherwise?
I’d sign off in your language, but have since forgotten the few basic words I ever knew, even for *goodbye* (apart from jedan, dva, etc) and my little phrasebook disappeared equally long ago.
August 13th, 2008 at 7:43 am
Thanks Anon
I wouldn’t take it as patronizing, a compliment is a compliment
Even our complete disagreement on political matters doesn’t mean we can’t be “friends”
BTW, this little site:
http://eudict.com/?lang=engcro&word=goodbye&go=Search
might be of use to you if you’re really into learning Croatian words. I also found this:
http://www.hr/hrvatska/language/
but didn’t check if it’s any good. Maybe you can learn something in the line of “you can’t rob me”
August 13th, 2008 at 3:15 pm
wow, i would’ve never guessed Egypt was number one.
btww, first time posting,
but i’ve been reading the lists almost everyday for several months,
i think it’s about time i actually commented :].
August 13th, 2008 at 6:19 pm
Lecter,
Cheers, Nice one on the robbery front!
Please see over at the *nasty* site (I’d rather not be there actually, but you know what goddam war is. Once you’re in it it’s not so easy to get out!!!) There’s a bit more of an apology for you along the same lines there. Also more about friendship *across the lines* (Germans and Brits playing soccer at Christmas during WW1).
I honestly don’t think (and it has joined my life’s million-and-one regrets) that I shall ever be able to visit your lovely land again, *stuck* as I now am in Chile (well, that’s a lovely land too, thankfully). A dozen or so years ago, when we were still just about still hanging on in England, I had hoped to take Anita (Chilean) to Turkey via the alps, the Adriatic and Greece, but alas, fate intervened. It was not to be. Now we simply don’t have the resources.
August 13th, 2008 at 7:25 pm
OK, I know land mines are a serious problem, but the first thing I thought when I saw the pic of the guys in number three:
“Man, those dudes from Angoloa are CUT! They must do, like, a million sit-ups a day to look like that!”
August 13th, 2008 at 8:18 pm
sanasunshine – Welcome to the world of comments! Please feel free to join us in the forums, we need more commenters there, too.
August 13th, 2008 at 8:39 pm
116. Anon…(and it has joined my life’s million-and-one regrets)…
****
You know, more than anyone, that I could (probably am even entitled to) have regrets about my life.
Yet I don’t. I regret nothing.
I embrace what I *do* have, what I *have* done. This doesn’t mean I don’t recognize mistakes I’ve made, but most of them were due to youthful exuberance or, the latest ones, to medical interactions…out of my control, so not of my doing.
One should only regret having done something which hurts someone else, either physically or psychologically.
Regret is a huge emotion, an enormous word.
You have a wife whom you love, and who loves you; a career which has kept your interest all of your life.
These are treasures beyond measure.
Whatever you hold up against them as regrets, must pale in comparison, until they are nothing.
August 13th, 2008 at 10:29 pm
geez. crazy stuff. good list though
August 13th, 2008 at 10:44 pm
segue,
Thanks for that. I guess I either misused the word regret, or was not able to put into it the intended expression, which was actually a wistful sigh. No heavy or regretful sense was intended at all. It did not include people either. Who more could I wish for than those I have? (Well. O.K., nice to have David Attenborough as a next door neighbour, sure!) It was really simply meant to convey the vast amount of potentially wonderful experiences and things that are available in this wide world, and the pathetically tiny number even the luckiest of us are able to encompass, given the time and means available. (And am I one of the luckiest, and do I know it!) I regret nothing either, except mildly perhaps my own inability to make more of my own life at times. Regrets as expressed above are essentially little more than my acknowledgement of those boundless treasures out there, and how wonderful it would be to see more. Who couldn’t feel that about watching the Blue Bird of Paradise in New Guinea, or scuba diving one of the world’s finer reefs, or visiting far-flung friends, or seeing the giant panda at home among its bamboos, then climbing up to the seas of Himâlayan rhododendrons and on to Lhasa. Greedy, yes. Ungrateful or dissatisfied, never!
August 14th, 2008 at 12:21 am
Rushfan – Great list, something different from the norm
August 14th, 2008 at 10:55 am
121. Anon, I think what you were trying for, and something I feel as well, is a sense of wistfulness.
Just changing the word in your vocabulary, in your thoughts, makes an enormous difference in how you view yourself in the world.
Wistfulness. Wistful.
It’s gentler, too.
August 14th, 2008 at 11:04 am
segue, (123),
Yes indeed, acknowledged (as per my 121, l,2, word 7).
One writes at such speed here, at all times of day and night, in odd moments, sometimes dead beat, and in several lists near-simultaneously, also wondering whether a precise word in mind will just be too obscure and *intellectually snobbish*, and whether a *British* word will mean what is intended to an American, Aussie or Croatian, that I fear such slips are inevitable. As I
August 14th, 2008 at 11:12 am
segue, (123),
Yes indeed, acknowledged (as per my 121, line 2, word 7).
One writes at such speed here, at all times of day and night, in odd moments, sometimes dead beat, and in several lists near-simultaneously. Will a precise word in mind just be too obscure and *intellectually snobbish*? Will a *British* word or reference mean what is intended to an American, Aussie or Croatian? Under that combination of circumstances, I fear such slips are inevitable. As I’ve noted elsewhere, when I write for publication, I try to keep on re-reading until I can make no more changes. Sometimes that takes up to half-a-dozen or more times, with no guaratee I’ve got it right. The proof of the cooking is in the eating!
In fact I don’t and didn’t need to change my thoughts. My feeling was and remains spot on. It was picking the right word(s) to interpret that feeling to others. If, as a moderately successful wordsmith and thinker I can have that problem …
August 14th, 2008 at 11:16 am
You see, how can I be expected to get my *meaning* straight, when even my spelling comes out gash? (Guaratee: a sort of sluggish Latin American aquatic mammal, perhaps?)
August 14th, 2008 at 11:21 am
Sorry about the 124 *torso*. Yet another example of same. More haste less speed this time. I have a *screen-wandering* indicator on our new mouse, and it had *wandered* onto the Submit point while I wasn’t looking.
August 14th, 2008 at 12:04 pm
Anon, you’d be surprised at the words I can manage to figure the meaning of, if used in context.
I completely agree about writing dead tired, at full speed, on several lists simultaneously, and hoping to keep it all straight and in some form of understandable English!
God knows I have send posts with the most bizarre combination of thoughts (if one can, even kindly, call them that), after a bad day or two. Now, I try to wait until I am in a fairly good place, to post. Makes me look smarter than the proverbial roomful of monkeys at the keyboards.
I’m glad I don’t have the *screen-wandering* indicator mouse! I’d never get anything right.
August 14th, 2008 at 1:27 pm
segue,
Again a fatal lapse with so much else on my mind. I unpardonably forgot to add that my comment was intended as humble in the face of yourself, of all people. What you achieve under your cirumstances defies simple admiration. My only handicap and excuse is the feebleness and lack of mental agility that accompanies senility! Seriously, I confess though, I do go for poor quantity against high quality in LV. Just can’t resist.
August 14th, 2008 at 1:30 pm
segue,
That peripatetic e-rodent scares the daylights out of me. I know one day when we are online banking, it’s going to wander with mischief in mind and cause us to pay someone 1000 dollars instead of 10!!
August 14th, 2008 at 2:04 pm
segue,
Anon regrets he will not be able to post for the rest of the afternoon, as he is just going out to weed the garden.
Actually, that’s a lie, I popped out after the last posting but have just popped back for a cup of tea. Nevetheless, I shall be hitting Senecio vulgaris hard again when the cup’s empty. Weeding is disastrous for LV. One goes out into the garden with a vacant mind and it immediately starts filling with LV material!
So in the few minutes since my last, it occurred to me that regret does in fact seem to carry a wide shade of nuances, as per my above example. What I originally intended to put to Lecter was that I very much regretted the opportunity to revisit his lovely land would never occur for me again. Then I realised how much in life that applied to, started to think about 1000 blah, blah, blah to see or do before you die, and decided to put it in a wider context, keeping (or recycling) the word I already had in mind.
From my dictionary, regret (p.p.) “… to wish one could have, or have again …”
I hope I’m not simply trying to wriggle off the hook here. I hate it when people do that. If the motive is simply examination of language in all its glory, which holds a fatal fascination, then I’m happy!
August 15th, 2008 at 8:41 am
Im my view somalia is the firs country effected by the land mines, hosnestly i am staying in somalia and i know the reality each day on person dead for sake of the landmines, there is huminatarian agency attempting to protect the people.
August 15th, 2008 at 8:20 pm
The technology with the pouched rats is pretty exciting – they’re much more effective than dogs as they enjoy doing the same tasks over and over again, and they’re light enough that there’s pretty much no danger of them setting the mines off. They can do a few square metres at a time pretty quickly. Plus they’re very cute.
Interestingly, the same rats can detect tuberculosis at about 90% accuracy or something like that; smart little fellows.
August 15th, 2008 at 10:13 pm
I love how the picture depicting Iran is a mob and a guy throwing a rock. I understand theres a lot of internal conflict (my mom lived there until she was seventeen and was there last winter) but I think you could have shown a nicer photo. The persian culture is rich and beautiful. And if you look on wiki they’re considered the ‘first historic people’. I’mnot insulting you list or anything, just trying to raise awareness to those of you who may not know your history.
August 18th, 2008 at 8:11 am
I like the list, but could it be more representative of the threat the landmines pose in each country?
For example, percentage of population killed/maimed by landmines, landmines in populated areas or farmland?
August 18th, 2008 at 1:35 pm
Dear friends, I live in Iran and I feel very proud to be Iranian.
We love the people who live around the world. I think Iranian people are demonstrated badly in the world and that’s for the benefit of some people (not nations) and a few presidents who don’t care to kill the people for their own benefits.They kill people in Iraq,Afghanistan and many other countries but call us, terrorists.Where are these landmines coming from?
I sometimes see some pictures in some sites (like here) that I can’t even see them around myself.
I dare to say that’s wrong. Such pictures are demonstrated to ruin the face of the people who have a rich culture and kind hearts.
Have you ever seen REAL pictures from Iran and Iranian people? Have you ever traveled to Iran to see some historical monuments and truly great attractions of my country? What resources are you using to know my country? Change your point of view …
I have seen many tourists and I have always asked them this question. They almost always said:” what we see here is really different from what we have heard and seen about your country.”
I hope you one day discover this new world.A real paradise that is remained unknown.I’ll say again ,I feel very proud to be Iranian and WE love you … all of you……..
If there is anything that I can help with to know my country better,don’t hesitate
August 18th, 2008 at 6:14 pm
Ali
I only hope that one day the world will change for the better. The real terrorists are the ones who use the media to change the majority’s opinions for their own benifit. I think the picture above is not meant to hurt anyones fealings, but you are absaloutley right, the only pictures I have seen of your country Iran are of people kicking in the sand rioting about something or another. I enjoyed looking through some of your links. Believe you have at least one person here who dosent have a thing against your country, and never will.
August 18th, 2008 at 6:18 pm
I thought this picture was incredible. Lake Oroomieh – North-Western Iran. From the second link from the top.
August 18th, 2008 at 6:40 pm
wya & Ali ~ I can completely understand your frustration. You just have to realize who represents your country abroad. Your leadership speaks of destroying Israel and not much more. I’ve heard about “young Iranians” who want to change the country from within, but don’t have enough opportunity to do so. It’s forums such as this where Iranian citizens can speak out and represent *themselves* as individuals where we find out the truth about people. Maybe I’ll work on some sort of list about Iran or it’s history and culture.
August 18th, 2008 at 6:47 pm
Or better yet, you guys should write lists about Iran. After all, you’re there.
August 18th, 2008 at 10:18 pm
Hey Ali…I have an uncle named Ali. He lives here now though. And thats quite a common name over there. Still cool. My heart goes out to you. Do you live in Tehran? I have family there…I’m only half but I take pride in being persian. My mom got me the Farvahar when she was over there and I love it. Its so pretty and I wear it all the time. Not to mention Zoroaster is among the greatest people in the history of mankind. Stay strong! We love you too!!
August 19th, 2008 at 7:48 am
Thank you for your nice comments.Dear melina , I live in Isfahan .
If you found these links interesting please send them to your friends.I hope we see a day that all the people around the world are friends and there is no war in the world.
Thank you
August 19th, 2008 at 8:35 pm
I think the somlia picture is godlike
March 23rd, 2009 at 1:32 am
where’s vietnam?
March 28th, 2009 at 9:26 am
to clear up a few things about Egypt and its landmines record, as an Egyptian, we know that they do exist, but in the deserts, mostly in areas you would never consider going to, unless u really want to have some extreme safari with no human to be seen in a million mile radius or something!
please do not get discouraged by this list, you just have to be careful when going on a safari.there is more to egypt than venturing into the desert anyways. at least there arent any near the pyramids, which is our main tourist attraction!
April 20th, 2009 at 9:32 pm
i think this is a very very sad subject why do people put these devastating things out there it is jusy sick. i didn’t even no anything about landmines untill i read a book about a little girl that was maimed by a landmine it was very upsetting. i hope 1 day there will be no such things as landmines…
May 6th, 2009 at 7:15 am
yo bitches
October 26th, 2009 at 8:39 am
yeah my country is on the list,guess what it is???
February 21st, 2010 at 1:27 pm
@dude3 (51):Uhhh so you go down the road turn left, go past the school and hang a right onto main then you go into the giant warehouse 3 km on your right and there you will meet a man named Craig he will take you to humanitarian peninsula, you will get on the boat and sail to croatia, thats where croatia is.