Civil lawsuits cost the US economy over 200 billion dollars per year! According to the US Federal News, every taxpayer in the US is now paying a “lawsuit tax” of around $700 – $800 per year. It is no surprise that personal injury lawyers are thriving in the States and that the law schools are packed to overflowing with potential new lawyers. This list takes a look at some of the bizarre lawsuits that these lawyers have had to handle – some dealing with personal injury lawsuits, and others with cases so weird that they lack a category entirely. This list deals with recent lawsuits only.
Robert Lee Brock, a prisoner in Virginia in 1995 wished to be removed from prison and placed in a mental institution. In order to achieve his goal, he decided to sue himself. He claimed that his crime was committed whilst he was drunk, which was a violation of his religious beliefs. He claimed that he had violated his own civil liberties. He sued himself for $5 million but to make matters worse, he claimed that the state should pay as he was behind bars and without an income. Thankfully the case was dismissed and Brock didn’t get his transfer.
In 1999, Daniel Dukes, a 27 year old moran from Florida hatched a clever plot so that he could have his life long dream of swimming with a whale fulfilled. He hid from the security guards at Sea World and managed to stay in the park after closing. Shortly after, he dived into the tank containing a killer whale – fulfilling his dream. Daniel was killed by the whale. His parents proceeded to sue Sea World because they did not display public warnings that the whale (Tillikum) could kill people. They also claim that the whale is wrongly portrayed as friendly because of the stuffed toys sold there. Tillikum is pictured above at Sea World, where the trainers will not enter the pool with him due to the fact that he has now been involved in two deaths. [Image source]
A 27 year old New Yorker is suing Subway because he took a bite of a sandwhich and found a 7 inch knife baked into the bread. The knife did not cut him and he did not swallow it. The reason he is suing is because he was violently ill with “severe stomach issues” for three hours and he claims that he caught food poisoning from the handle of the knife which was plastic and, according to the man, filthy. He is suing for $1,000,000.
This is a true case of believe it or not. Christopher Roller, a resident of Minnesota sued David Blaine and David Copperfield – demanding that they reveal their secret magic tricks to him. He demanded 10% of their total income for life. The reason for the suit is that Roller believes that the magicians are defying the laws of physics, and thereby using godly powers. But it gets worse. Roller is suing not just because the magicians are using God’s powers – he is suing because he thinks he is God and therefore it is his powers they are stealing.
Marcy Noriega, a California police officer decided to tase a suspect in the back of her car when he became uncontrollable and started kicking at the windows. Noriega drew her taser from her belt and fired it at the man. Unfortunately for the crook, the officer had accidentally drawn her gun instead, and she shot him in the chest – killing him. The city is now suing the taser company, arguing that any reasonable officer could mistakenly draw and shoot their gun instead of their taser. They are suing for the full costs of the wrongful death lawsuit which the man’s family has filed against the city.
This is a recent case in which a 52 year old traffic officer from Los Angeles sued Victoria’s Secret for damage to her eye. The damage was caused, claims the cop (Macrida Patterson), when she was trying on a new thong. The tight fit caused a metal clip to fly off hitting her in the eye. The case was filed on June 9, 2008 and Officer Patterson is seeking unspecified damages. The courts have not yet informed the officer that as a traffic cop, she doesn’t need fancy underwear as she is unlikely to ever have a date anyway.
PETA, the often-insane animal loving organization held an anti-hunt protest in 2001 – defending the rights of deer to live. On they way home from the protest, two members hit a deer which had run on to the highway. The members informed the New Jersey Division of Fish and and Wildlife that they intended to sue for damages and injuries. In their letter they stated that the Division were responsible for the damages “as a result of their deer management program, which includes, in certain circumstances, an affirmative effort to increase deer population.”
For a while in the 1990s, Anheuser-Busch, the producers of Budweiser, ran a series of ads in which two beautiful women come to life in front of two truck drivers. A Michigan man bought a case of the beer, drank it, and failed to see two women materialize. Cue the lawsuit. He sued the company for false advertising, asking for a sum in excess of $10,000. Thankfully the court dismissed the suit and the man remained penniless and dateless.
We all know that the weather reports are frequently wrong and we take that into account when planning our days, but this was not the case for an Israeli woman who sued a TV station for making an inaccurate prediction. The station predicted good weather but it rained. The woman claimed that the forecast caused her to dress lightly – resulting in her catching the flu, missing a week of work, and spending money on medication. She further claimed that the whole incident caused her stress. She sued for $1,000 – and won.
In 1992, a seventy-nine year old Albuquerque woman (Stella Liebeck) bought a coffee from a McDonald’s drive through. Her grandson was driving and he parked the car so she could add cream and sugar to the drink. She put the cup between her knees and pulled the lid toward her – inevitably the coffee spilt in her lap. She sued McDonald’s for negligence because she claimed the coffee was too hot to be safe. Unbelievably the jury found that McDonald’s was eighty percent responsible for the incident and they awarded Liebeck $160,000 in compensatory damages. But it gets worse: they awarded her $2.7 million punitive damages! The decision was appealed and the two parties ultimately ended up settling out of court for a sum less than $600,000.
Contributors: damien_karras, and JFrater
























January 28th, 2009 at 3:14 am
i liked this one better than the disco one
January 28th, 2009 at 3:15 am
Hmm… who would have thought that a KILLER whale would be capable of killing a man? Genius.
January 28th, 2009 at 3:18 am
God that picture of the weather-man is hillarious, when I read the title Women Vs Act of God I thoght she was suing out of a different reason
January 28th, 2009 at 3:19 am
for the love of money
great list
January 28th, 2009 at 3:20 am
Lols, reminds me of the Billy Connelly movie: The Man Who Sued God
January 28th, 2009 at 3:22 am
OMG, the first and second ones are the most ridiculous indeed.. :/
January 28th, 2009 at 3:23 am
Ummm, too American????
Should no 9 read “man” or “moron”?
January 28th, 2009 at 3:23 am
The case in no 1 is more complex than it is represented here. The woman had good reason for suing, and McDonald’s did alter their standards for the better after the case. You can read about it here. http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cur78.htm
January 28th, 2009 at 3:26 am
i wonder if no1 would have sued if it was too cold & didn’t get burnt
January 28th, 2009 at 3:28 am
No. 7 made my jaw drop!! How insane! Hmmmm… Maybe I’ll have to think about suing Jfrater for keeping me from my work while I read all these lists! ….. NAH!
January 28th, 2009 at 3:29 am
astraya: naughty! As for number 9 spelling error – here is why I spelt it that way.
January 28th, 2009 at 3:29 am
writergal: don’t even THINK about it!
January 28th, 2009 at 3:30 am
There are some friolous people out there. They can’t buck up and own up to their idiocy and cry foul when someone (or thing) else is even remotely. All they try to do it get money without working for it. They should look at their own responsibilties first and realise how pathetic some people can be.
Sorry for the rant, these type of lawsuits make me realise how crazy people can get.
January 28th, 2009 at 3:31 am
hahahaha – Jfrater: You’re lucky I don’t like lawyers! Anyhow, look at this face! Would I do that? NEVER!
January 28th, 2009 at 3:31 am
* Frivolous
** even remotely involved
*** all they try to do is
Sometimes i get all mixed up with my words so i do aologise for the grammar in my previous comment
January 28th, 2009 at 3:34 am
that peta sucks picture awesome.
January 28th, 2009 at 3:54 am
Still doesn’t make up for the last few lists…but good list nonetheless! Some people will do insane, harmful, illegal things for money…lucky for us ALL the people on this list just said “screw it” and decided to sue some people
January 28th, 2009 at 3:57 am
I love hearing about this stuff-when the idiot loses. The ones that win make me angry that stupid people can spend the money and waste the time in a hail mary attempt to get rich or get what they want. Great list though. I’d never heard of some of these. I laughed out loud at the jackass who decided to swim with a KILLER whale. :O)
January 28th, 2009 at 3:59 am
What really amazes me is not so much how stupid these lawsuits are but there are lawyers out there who are prepared to take them on …, they truly are the despised bottom-feeders popular culture makes them out to be.
January 28th, 2009 at 4:00 am
writergal: If you want money from Jamie, you’d better start by clicking on advertising links and buying merchandise from the List Universe store, so he’s got money when you sue him.
January 28th, 2009 at 4:05 am
Used to love a Very old English TV series called “Misleading Cases” with the wonderful Roy Dotrice as the vexatious bored pensioner and Alistair Sims as the Judge.
That man could spot a legal absurdity!
Remember him presenting a signed cow at his local bank to reluctantly pay a bill, and ending up in court!
The TV world makes a good living off the law too…
January 28th, 2009 at 4:06 am
Astraya: I’ll definitely do that – I get so much enjoyment out of this site (both the lists and the comments) that I feel I SHOULD be paying Jfrater!
January 28th, 2009 at 4:50 am
I actually recently read a more thorough account of the woman who sued McD’s… While at the time she was the poster-girl for frivolous lawsuits, her coffee actually severely injured her. She had third degree burns! She actually had to have skin grafts! For a woman of her age, that is really dangerous. And why does coffee need to be that hot?
I know it sounds like an idiotic thing to sue about, but when a company gives you a dangerous product, doesn’t warn you about the severe consequences associated with it, have a well documented history of complains about severe burns from their product, and you need money for skin grafts… well. I can’t say I really blame her. We live in a sue-happy culture these days, but this is one case where I think it was warranted.
January 28th, 2009 at 5:03 am
Loved the list. I’m easy to please though as I love all the lists on this site, gives me something to look forward to read each morning.
And I must be a “moran” as I never noticed the misspelling until I read the comments LOL
January 28th, 2009 at 5:11 am
Awesome list (and I don’t think it needs to make up for the last few, they were great too.)
I had actually heard of the McDonalds scalding suit but seriously, suing yourself?! Maybe I’ll give that a go :p I might sue my university for ‘emotional damage and stress’ due to the amount of work I have to do….. what d’ya reckon my chances are?
And with that, back to work!
Thanks damien_karras, and JFrater
January 28th, 2009 at 5:12 am
There is a senator from Nebraska that recently tried to sue God. I got a good laugh when i heard about that and thought for sure it would be included on the list when i read the title.
January 28th, 2009 at 5:15 am
Addendum to #7…I have a pending lawsuit against Christopher Roller for falsely impersonating me, God.
January 28th, 2009 at 5:18 am
Sometimes, the legal system just amazes me as to how stupid it is, and also the people who file such arrogant lawsuits. What makes matters worse is that sometimes, a jury is used and the jury itself makes a stupid decision. You just can’t try juries these days… they’ll believe anything a lawyes will tell them.
January 28th, 2009 at 5:23 am
I’m never surprised by the amazing and often times ridiculous claims that people will try to pass off to make some money from either a profitable corporation or somebody who is completely innocent. In a few incidents it can be very amazing that a lawsuit such as a few in this list will win too! Good List to see on this site.
January 28th, 2009 at 5:36 am
Ok only in America do we have stupid people like this. PETA incident is funny as hell. They just don’t realize animal control through hunting is a good thing as long as you don’t go overboard. I would like to see a list of lawsuits like this for other countries. Just so I won’t feel like American’s are the only idiots out there.
January 28th, 2009 at 5:36 am
How about this one?
A $10 dry cleaning bill for a pair of trousers has ballooned into a $67 million civil lawsuit.
Plaintiff Roy Pearson, a judge in Washington, D.C., says in court papers that he’s been through the ringer over a lost pair of prized pants he wanted to wear on his first day on the bench.
He says in court papers that he has endured “mental suffering, inconvenience and discomfort.”
He says he was unable to wear that favorite suit on his first day of work.
He’s suing for 10 years of weekend car rentals so he can transport his dry cleaning to another store.
January 28th, 2009 at 5:42 am
the case no 1 reminds me of a similar situation in which kramer in seinfeld once found himself
D
January 28th, 2009 at 5:44 am
this isnt really a lawsuit but it has to o with PETA. They are asking american schools with mascots as fishes to change their name to sea kittens
January 28th, 2009 at 5:46 am
When I was at law school, we learnt about tonnes of similar cases. One of my favourites was a guy who broke into someones house while they were on holidays and accidentally locked himself in the garage. He survived for a couple of weeks on what he could find in the garage, a case of pepsi and a bag of dog food. He was released when the owners returned home and successfully sued them.
My other favourite case was a guy in america who spoke english as a second language and who bought a campervan. The campervan had cruise control on it. The man thought that cruise control was the same as auto pilot, so he put it on cruise control and went out the back to make himself a cup of coffee. Needless to say the campervan crashed. He successfully sued the campervan company and is the reason all campervans come with warnings about not to leave the drivers seat.
We learnt tonnes of these cases as a bit of fun at the end of one of our torts lessons, the theme of which was basically ‘only in america’. There are a couple of silly cases in Australia, but none as crazy as the American ones!
January 28th, 2009 at 5:48 am
I just remembered another one of my favourites. This was a British case where a guy bought a pair of jocks from a clothing store and wore them without washing them first. It turns out someone with crabs had tried them on at the store, and he ended up getting crabs from the underwear. He tried to sue the store but the Judge decided that a reasonable person would wash their underwear before wearing them and thus the store was not at fault and he lost the case. The British legal system makes much more sense!
January 28th, 2009 at 6:01 am
The McDonalds coffee lawsuit really doesn’t belong on this list. The woman ended up with third degree burns all over her nether regions, and spent weeks or months in the hospital in excruciating pain while she received skin grafts.
The reason she WON the case is because McDonalds was negligent. Just because on the surface it “sounds” funny or frivolous doesn’t necessarily mean it is. I’m disappointed that you guys didn’t do your homework on this one.
January 28th, 2009 at 6:03 am
i assume that the ones that don’t tell us the result of the suit are still in litigation?
if peta wins the deer-case i will be ashamed of america again……
January 28th, 2009 at 6:03 am
Lol
I remember hearing the story of that woman who decided to dry her pet cat by putting it in the microwave. The cat obviously died and the woman sued the microwave company for not having a label on it that said “Do not put your pets in here”
I suppose this list goes to show that some people are just plain stupid.
And definately that the legal system is in dire need of sorting out.
Good list
PS – I am all for animal rights but I seriously hate PETA
January 28th, 2009 at 6:05 am
The Macdonalds case was perfectly fine. Macdonalds did have their coffe at too high a temperature. Thank God they fixed it.
Also the Killer Whale case was special no doubt. Killer Whales, despite preying on everything from turtles to seals to whales to sharks, do not prey on humans.
January 28th, 2009 at 6:13 am
it’s true that “killer whales” don’t seek out people as a food source, but they are large and inquisitive animals with powerful jaws full of teeth.
one could very easy kill a human while “toying” with them to investigate what they were. i can especially see this happening when the whale is isolated and bored in a seaworld tank, and all the sudden someone unknown jumps in -it’s very likely the whale thought “food? new toy? i’ll find out” and that was the end of the “moran.” in the wild they have been known to kill people, just not usually eat them afterwards, it’s thought they mistake the people for seals, but who really knows.
January 28th, 2009 at 6:15 am
My personal favorite it the thief who tried to sue a homeowner after he broke a window (to rob the place) and cut himself, nearly dying.
Oh, and as for the list being too American (astraya #7), the wonderful thing about listverse is you can submit a list yourself…
January 28th, 2009 at 6:17 am
As mentioned before NO 1 is often citied as a example of the stupidity of common law but the case is totally different than how it is portrayed. Another such case was the whole americans sue tobacco companies. People in Europe often thought that they sued them because cigatrettes cause cancer when in fact they were sued for changing the amnount of nicotine and other substances when sales were low.
January 28th, 2009 at 6:20 am
Yeah, I once found a big chunk of broken glass in an omelet. It was obviously an accident. I asked for another omelet, not a bajillion dollars.
January 28th, 2009 at 6:23 am
And the reason there are so many bizarre and frivolous lawsuits to put into listform? Because some of them wins, and people are greedy.
January 28th, 2009 at 6:27 am
I think with No. 1, the stupidity has nothing to do with the 3rd degree burns, but that one should expect coffee to be hot.
It maybe true that McDonalds should adopt a certain temperature for serving their coffee. But even so, it would be expected common sense for people to be careful not to spill coffee onto themselves.
January 28th, 2009 at 6:30 am
google StellaAwards
January 28th, 2009 at 6:41 am
archangel – i would treat coffee differently if it I knew it might dissolve my skin because it was so hot. I make coffee at home and I buy it at stores and I’ve spilled it on myself more than once. I spilled some coffee on my hand today in fact. Fact is, I didn’t do it on purpose, and I would have been pretty pissed if it was hot enough to give me a third degree burn. Coffee is for drinking, not melting terminators.
I’m sure she didn’t intend to spill it all over herself. I actually just read the article posted above about it – the judge found her 20% responsible for her burns, since she wasn’t careful enough.
January 28th, 2009 at 6:49 am
I can’t understand how someone can take a paper cup fill with hot liquid and sit it between their legs. Yes the liquid may have been too hot, but they didn’t have to find Macdonalds 80% responsible.
January 28th, 2009 at 6:53 am
#2 just really gets me. I wonder if the judge/jury passed a high school biology class? How you dress and the weather has nothing to do with catching the flu. A person has to come in contact with the flu virus to get sick. Very simple stuff here folks. This case would be just as insane as someone suing the doctor whose office gave them a flu shot and they ended up getting the flu. The flu shot only contains a certain strain of the virus, therefore if a person comes into contact with a different strain of the virus they can get sick. People are just stupid. By the logic used in these cases I should sue all fast food joints for my weight gain (which I think that some tried). Or I should sue the diaper company for causing me to do more laundry because a couple time my daughters diaper leaked. I could do this all day. People are just greedy, sheesh!!!
January 28th, 2009 at 6:53 am
36. Catherine: Its funny because it is funny, the lady is stupid and deserved to get burned, it is hot coffee, do not place hot coffee in your lap, period. I would like to thank her, now when i order my coffee i know for sure it is hot, always. I used to hate when i ordered my coffee and it was cold…..
January 28th, 2009 at 6:54 am
This is the biggest problem with the world. We protect/reward stupid people.
January 28th, 2009 at 6:55 am
also, my girlfriend found a grasshopper in a wendys salad, now we have $27,000….JACKPOT!
January 28th, 2009 at 6:55 am
Khen913 (41) Believe me, he knows he can submit his own lists since he his done it before. As for his comment, it is a slight play on the fact that all of this idiocy comes from America.
January 28th, 2009 at 6:55 am
Unbelievable. It’s sickening how some people seem to find lawsuits as means of coming up with some quick cash. But, such is the American way to sue, sue, sue.
About that coffee one, I work at a Dunkin’ Donuts, and I can’t even begin to describe how much the training courses/managers impress upon the employees to be extremely careful to make sure the lids are secure on the drinks. If it weren’t for ridiculous crap like this, I’m sure they wouldn’t pay it a second thought.
January 28th, 2009 at 7:05 am
To all the people who comment on the fact that this list is “Americanized” would you like a follow up list that contains world-wide idiotic lawsuits? Because theres plenty.
And I’ll make it.
January 28th, 2009 at 7:06 am
52. AllDayDre. So how did it feel to sell your soul? Liberating I bet.
January 28th, 2009 at 7:10 am
55. damien_karras
Feel free. But its always the Yanks that take the cake. Then they drop the cake on their toe, let it fester for a year, catch gangrene and then sue Sara Lee because it caused their sons ADHD.
No! That didnt really happen!!
January 28th, 2009 at 7:20 am
Honorable mention: Ernie Chambers v. God
http://www.ketv.com/news/14133442/detail.html
January 28th, 2009 at 7:26 am
On one hand I think these people are all morons and the dead ones are prime candidates for the Darwin Awards, if not already included. On the other hand, I think – well given the opportunity, why not screw the system. If the system is so ridiculous to allow such lawsuits, then go for it and make a bit of money. If people complain about these lawsuits costing them tax money, then perhaps the system needs to be changed. But also consider that these cases are just a very small fraction of the genuine cases. There always going to be extremes – if the system was tightened up, then some genuine cases might be excluded
January 28th, 2009 at 7:27 am
I agree with Catherine and Nelia wholeheartedly. This was a famous case we studied in my law school classes in an effort to teach us how the media can distort the facts of a case to the public. At the time, McDonald’s kept their coffee 20 degrees hotter than was recommended by the FDA. At that temperature the coffee’s steam weakens the plastic on the lid causing it to potentially fall off. The car was not in motion as McDonald’s had tried to claim (even one of the employees denied that) and the reason she had to put the coffee between her legs was because they were out of cupholders (she asked for one because the car didn’t have it). The woman did indeed have VERY serious injuries including third degree burns that required skin grafts. She was in the hospital for over a month. If McDonald’s was not in the wrong, why did they lower their coffee temperature to FDA recommended levels after the suit? Why did they redesign their cups and lids to make them stronger and include a hot warning? Why did they instruct their stores and franchises to never be out of cupholders under any circumstances? Maybe the amount she was rewarded seems like a lot, but how much is 600K to a company like McDonalds?
January 28th, 2009 at 7:31 am
I was once awarded $20000 in a suit because of injuries suffered whena store that I had entered that just opened for the day had not unlocked their exit door. Unknown to me when I went to leave the store I pushed on the door glass and went through it shattering the whole door and cutting my hand and arm with some severe cuts. They had no handles on the door yet and having the exit door locked made them negligible
January 28th, 2009 at 7:42 am
Wally: whats a YANK? It sounds vagely dirty
Seriously… Im an American not a blithely spewed sterotype
January 28th, 2009 at 7:47 am
None of these really shocked me, except the guy suing himself.. that seemed a little.. odd.
Oh, and 34. Tookyb and 38. Copaface, I’m pretty sure that snopes.com debunked the cruise-control and microwaved-pet stories.. but I can still see people suing companies for things like this. What has the world come to?
January 28th, 2009 at 7:48 am
I’m going to defend number 8, here. Maybe a million bucks is too much to ask, but baking a knife into a loaf of bread is clearly negligence (not to mention disgusting). That man could have been severely injured or even died from the contamination.
January 28th, 2009 at 7:53 am
If someone got 3rd degree burns from coffee, it is way too hot. I’ve spilled lots of coffee on myself (having worked in two different coffee shops) and never received anything worse than a 1st degree, there is no reason to keep coffee THAT hot.
January 28th, 2009 at 7:57 am
Are you guys serious with the defense of the hot coffee lady? Including a ‘hot’ warning? How about including a warning that people with shit for brains shouldn’t drink beverages intended to be served hot? Do we really have to explain what happens when you pour something hot in your crotch what will happen next? At what point does a liquid become too hot for someone and too tepid for someone else? Shame on McDonalds for intentionally going out of their way to damage the crotches of mouthbreathers out there.
She was in the hospital for a month for a reason – she’s fucking stupid. And McDonalds lowered their coffee temperature to avoid shit heads who can’t hold onto a cup of coffee with their hands and not their naughty bits.
Wow, this coffee burned my tender loins, how odd.
And you wonder why there are instructions for using shampoo, and warnings on hair dryers to not be used while bathing in the tub. Congratulations, we now have to dumb everything down so that the people who used to be scratched out due to natural selection are now being rewarded for their gran-mal shitheadedness.
Pretty soon the king will be the one who just doesn’t shit himself.
January 28th, 2009 at 7:58 am
I like the guys who sue Hooters for sexual discrimination because they don’t hire men.
January 28th, 2009 at 8:01 am
good job, monkey.
I don’t understand the defending of number one. I’m sure people are more apt to complain about lukewarm coffee (ugh) than extra hot coffee, especially since extra hot coffee can be special ordered in some shops. Additionally, by the time you’re 79, one would hope you’ve learned that pulling or handling by the lid could potentially make it fall off. Her stupidity was not worth $600,000. I spilled boiling water on my kitchen floor trying to make mac and cheese once. A bunch of it splashed up and gave me burn blisters on my feet and legs. Did I sue Kraft for not telling me to be careful about draining my noodles? No, I laughed at my dumbassery. Responsibility doesn’t float out the window just because you hurt yourself.
January 28th, 2009 at 8:03 am
This list would be a lot better to me if there were sources cited that we could refer to read the actual case (assuming that the cases were reported in some sort of legal reporter). Either way, I would appreciate a list of sources. I think reading court decisions would make this even more funny. Thanks for the list!
January 28th, 2009 at 8:13 am
Great list :]
very interesting.
people are so freaking stupid.
January 28th, 2009 at 8:15 am
Thanks, JT, for the link to more details on the McD’s case (comment #8). I knew there was a lot more to that story than mainstream media would share. Yes, we should already know that coffee can be hot, but there’s a limit. If I were to spill a cup on my lap, I would probably be sore for a couple days, and my legs would be a lovely shade of pinkish red. Stella’s legs were so badly burned she needed skin grafts and hospitalization. There’s something wrong with that coffee, methinks.
January 28th, 2009 at 8:16 am
65. bucslim
“Pretty soon the king will be the one who just doesn’t shit himself.”
Dennis Miller?
January 28th, 2009 at 8:18 am
this one was good. interesting and well written:)
have hear about the guy who sued at car company. he was on the high way then switch on to cruise control while taking a nap. believing the car would navigate by itself. even though his stupidity only cost him a rather unpleasant wake up and a bumb. he sued the company -
theres also the one about a old lady. who sued a micrhowave company becuse they didnt advertice againts cats..
January 28th, 2009 at 8:23 am
Bucslim – At what point does a liquid become too hot for someone and too tepid for someone else?
Um… right around when it causes 3rd degree burns. I’m pretty sure there is no one in the world who can drink a cup of coffee that would require a women to get skin grafts.
I am curious though, have you really never once, in your entire life, spilled coffee on yourself? What about tea? Soup? Cause I don’t think you have to be “fucking stupid” to do that.
January 28th, 2009 at 8:24 am
Yes Kiribub, you caught me stealing from the master.
January 28th, 2009 at 8:31 am
i think its pretty smart i think i might sue whataburger for putting too much damn mustard in my burgers.
January 28th, 2009 at 8:33 am
Good list. The fact that there are probably enough of these cases to make three more lists goes to show how “sue happy” people have become. People expect others to pay for their irresponsibility instead of dealing with the consequences of their actions.
January 28th, 2009 at 8:34 am
I would be interested in reading a Europen version of this list…or a rest of the world version. It’s instances like the above that make americans seem a few sandwiches short of a picnic!
January 28th, 2009 at 8:34 am
Of course I’ve spilled coffee, tea and soup on myself. But I don’t sue Tetley’s, Folgers or Campbells for my clumsiness. I don’t sue the inventor of the fork because I have a fat ass. I don’t sue the homeowner I’m trying to rob because I was cut with glass when I fell through their skylight.
I don’t sue other people for my stupidity. At some point we all have to look into the mirror and decide that we should be responsible for the shit that goes down in our life, instead of blaming everyone else. The problem is for every douchebag out there who can’t get through life by themselves and their own cleverness fails them, there is an even bigger douchebag carrying a briefcase who will enthusiastically rubberstamp this kind of grabassery in a court of law.
January 28th, 2009 at 8:35 am
Great list.
BTW:
PETA – People Eating Tasty Animals
just saying
January 28th, 2009 at 8:36 am
lol
January 28th, 2009 at 8:37 am
You know what’s sad though – some of these people actually WIN??? Insane – I sometimes hate human beings in general.
January 28th, 2009 at 8:37 am
damien_karras – A list from other countries as well would be great. thanks for the offer.
January 28th, 2009 at 8:39 am
I understand your point Bucslim… but what I’m saying is that you (probably) didn’t spend a month in the hospital due to these accidents. Plus, of course, you probably heated the water for those things yourself to a somewhat normal temperature.
I dislike people who sue for stupid reasons – such as pretty much everyone else on this list. Home invaders who sue get a special place in my “you are a jackass of the highest order” box. I just think this is a case of the media making a knee-jerk assumption, putting the bare minimum of facts out there, and having a field day.
Alright, off to work. Interesting list!
January 28th, 2009 at 8:43 am
34. tookyb – January 28th, 2009 at 5:46 am
“When I was at law school, we learnt about tonnes of similar cases. One of my favourites was a guy who broke into someones house while they were on holidays and accidentally locked himself in the garage. He survived for a couple of weeks on what he could find in the garage, a case of pepsi and a bag of dog food. He was released when the owners returned home and successfully sued them…”
I had heard that one too although I always sort of regarded it as an urban legend. I refused to believe that the American legal system could be so asinine (no offense).
Most of these are just as stupid. The lady with the weather (and 3. DerShmoo, I saw the same thing!
)? An waht´s up with the traffic cop and the underwear?! Ridiculous…
The one I have to say I would agree with is the knife in the sandwich… If they are careless enough to drop a KNIFE into a batch of bread, then they should be punished. Someone could have gotten hurt.
And the truly despicable people in this are the lawyers who take on these ridiculous cases. It boggles the mind.
January 28th, 2009 at 8:46 am
um..buc?
Your use of grabassery sounds very similar to my use of dumbassery. It’s clear from the order of comments that my noun-assery phrasing was used before yours. I’ll therefore sue you for trademark infringment unless you’d like to settle with me to the tune of $800,000.
Respectfully,
Callie
January 28th, 2009 at 8:56 am
I’m sorry, I have to say it.
I saw phallic imagery in number 2.
January 28th, 2009 at 8:58 am
Callie, I will represent you for 20%
Bucslim, I will represent you in a counter suite of 1,000,000 based on freedom of speech in a public forum for 20% of the mil.
oose85
man I should have been a lawyer
Na
January 28th, 2009 at 8:59 am
bucslim: i thought your line was a variation of monty python search for the holy grail. did dennis take it from there?
January 28th, 2009 at 9:01 am
Nelia – it really doesn’t matter what the consequences are for sticking your hand in a running fan, licking a metal pole on a cold day, or chainsawing your leg instead of the log. The responsibility for these misfortunes lies with the person with chopped up fingertips, frozen tongue and a peg leg. So what if she spent a month in the hospital, that isn’t McDonald’s fault no matter how hot the coffee is. It would be if the drive thru person tossed the coffee in her face. She should have spent that time in the hospital contemplating why in God’s name she is still breathing.
We’re supposed to sympathize with that? We’re supposed to give them money? WTF?
Nelia, there is no defense for this on any level. But your comments proves that there will be plenty more people in court pleading their cases and judges and juries will actually listen.
January 28th, 2009 at 9:06 am
Disc – Monty Python -
He must be a king.
Why?
He doesn’t have shit all over him.
Dennis Miller -
Pretty soon the king will be the one who just doesn’t shit himself.
Yeah, there might be a connection, both invoke kings and shitting. Python’s is outside the robe, Miller’s is inside the robe.
January 28th, 2009 at 9:08 am
Callie, oose85 – is Johnny Cochran still around?
If my head’s full of shit, you must aquit!
January 28th, 2009 at 9:14 am
The facts behind #9 are flawed. Tilikum was involved with the first incident with two of the other whales when a trainer slipped into the pool – note trainers were not entering the water where those whales were held. In the second case, the one described, the most widely accepted theory is that the man died due to drowning caused by the effects of hypothermia. He was found on Tilikum because simply because his corpse was there and the whale simply acted naturally by treating it as a toy. There is little evidence to suggest that Tilikum had anything to do with his death.
Moreover, the reason behind Tilikum not working with trainers is NOT due to his involvement in two deaths. The death of the trainer lays more with the other two whales who were pregnant at the time and were thus more aggresive when the trainer entered the water with them. Tilikum simply joined in interpreting it as play (a male orca will almost never hold dominance over female ones, especially when they are with child). He is not dealt with by the trainers anymore because of his sheer size – the incidents noted above simply support this belief. He is the largest orca in capativity so even if he is feeling playful he can do more damage than he means to do.
Bottom line is that he is a “killer whale” because he is an orca, not because he is some murderous sea beast.
January 28th, 2009 at 9:14 am
I´m the dude, now get me my white russian.
January 28th, 2009 at 9:20 am
When I was 18, I was sued by a woman claiming that I ran her over in my car while going 70 mph. She only had some bruises on her legs. About 90 days into the lawsuit she produced a dress with tire marks across them. The police knew that it was BS but said that she had the right to sue me. So it cost me money for attorney fees and time off of work.
I love the PETA one, that organization is full of morons.
January 28th, 2009 at 9:21 am
i heard of a case where a guy bought a motor home and was driving it on the highway then he put it on cruise control and went to make coffee then he sued the dealer because he crashed.
January 28th, 2009 at 9:23 am
I’m going to add my voice to the list of people arguing that the McDonald’s case is not as cut-and-dried as it sounds. At the time, McDonald’s served their coffee much hotter than anyone else, and they knew that. The heat caused the plastic lids to weaken, and they knew that. In the trial, it came out that they’d had hundreds and hundreds of complaints regarding coffee cup lids giving way and burning people’s hands or arms or legs, and paid $500,000 in small increments to settle burn lawsuits. But then the worst possible case happened, and an elderly woman, slow to react, spilled the coffee on her crotch when she was in a position where she couldn’t move easily and got third-degree burns on her genitals, and McDonald’s was sued for… $20,000. *Not* $2.8 million, not even $600,000. $20,000 to cover the medical bills, and McDonald’s told her to get lost. Even after she sued, her attorney put forward two settlement offers ($90,000 and $300,000), both of which McDonald’s shot down. The state of New Mexico brought in a neutral third-party arbiter, who suggested a settlement of $225,000, which McDonald’s also rejected.
In retrospect, McDonald’s probably should have counter-sued their lawyers for gross incompetence. Any time the plaintiff’s settlement offers increase during pretrial negotiations, that’s a warning to the defense that things are not going well. Instead, McDonald’s went to trial. This was a potentially difficult situation, as defending a company from charges of “inflicting third-degree burns on an elderly grandmother’s genitals” requires a certain degree of gentleness and tact, which the McDonald’s attorneys, to put it mildly, did not have. It takes a certain kind of attorney to lose a lawsuit so badly that the jury awards more than 13 times what the plaintiff originally asked for, but McDonald’s had that kind of attorney.
(For a good neutral take on the case that presents both sides, check out Wikipedia.)
This is not to say that there aren’t plenty of truly frivolous lawsuits — the Washington pants lawsuit (comment #31) is in legal reality even more frivolous than the pop-culture version of the McDonald’s coffee lawsuit — but a handful of silly-sounding-but-legit cases sometimes get included in these lists.
January 28th, 2009 at 9:24 am
buc
your smartassery is astounding
January 28th, 2009 at 9:25 am
#1 needed to happen. The coffee was way too hot, and McDonals had been warned multiple times before that incodent and ignored the complaints. Many people think that this was rediculous but if you look into the facts it was a resonable lawsuit.
What about people slipping on ice and suing the owner of the sidewalk, or burglers who sue because they get hurt while robbing someone. Are these just urban legends or are they true?
January 28th, 2009 at 9:25 am
think about mcdonald’s lady’s case -if the coffee was consistently being served at a temperature that would cause instant 3rd-degree burns it would damage the mouths of everyone who every took a sip! there were never reports of this as a wide spread problem -no to mention mcdonald’s would lose money by losing sales if they served coffee that cooked everyone’s mouths! there are more details of her case:
“On February 27, 1992, Stella Liebeck, a 79-year-old woman from Albuquerque, New Mexico, ordered a cup of coffee from mcdonald’s. She placed the coffee cup between her knees and pulled the far side of the lid toward her to remove it. In the process, she spilled the entire cup of coffee on her lap.
Liebeck was wearing cotton sweatpants; they absorbed the coffee and held it against her skin as she sat in the puddle of hot liquid for over 90 seconds, scalding her thighs, buttocks, and groin. Liebeck was taken to the hospital, where it was determined that she had suffered third-degree burns on six percent of her skin and lesser burns over sixteen percent.”
so it was the combination of HER outfit and actions with the coffee that burned her, i’d say she was about 95% responsible, not merely 20%. when i worked at starbucks there were always some people who’d order “extra hot @180F” drinks, hot enough to scald the milk, and start sucking it down the second in was in their hand. maybe her grandson who was driving should have offered to help grandma open her damn coffee cup…
January 28th, 2009 at 9:27 am
Only in america…
January 28th, 2009 at 9:29 am
I’m going to reitterate what a lot of other people have pointed out. The McDonald’s coffee case was a bad call. Replace it with the stupid lost pants case because that was actually a frivolous lawsuit. While the case did seem bizarre, I’ll give you that, it was a serious case.
At the time of the incident, I lived in ABQ and went to that McDonald’s. They did have their coffee way too hot and knew it. They had been told both my customers and according to rumor by the health department that it was too hot before the elderly lady was burnt. They told people to just wait a minute or two before drinking it rather than turning down the burners. It was a pretty clear cut case of negligence.
The lady had multiple skin grafts to her vulva and inner thighs. She was in the hospital for a good while. It was all over the media and she really tried to be out of the media circuit as possible while her family pursued the case to get her medical bills covered.
January 28th, 2009 at 9:31 am
maybe granny was jonesing for that caffeine real bad. I’ve burned myself on pizza cause I couldn’t wait for it to cool off before needing to stuff my face with it. mmmm…steamy
January 28th, 2009 at 9:33 am
Callie – your asshatassery is retarted
January 28th, 2009 at 9:33 am
well then, telo, maybe they SHOULD have waited a minute. before pouring it down their gullets. See my pizza story above. And “according to rumor” should never be used to prove facts. That’s actually the opposite of facts.
January 28th, 2009 at 9:34 am
What a horrible time to be living in. This suing culture is sucking the life out of everything. Do I need my bag of peanuts to have the warning “May contain nuts”? I wonder if everyone who has been lent money by the banks in the last 10 years or so can sue the said bank for recklessly lending money. Or whether we can sue the government for falling house prices?
January 28th, 2009 at 9:35 am
An absolutely hilarious list!
Another example of how dumb, lazy, and greedy this society has become. I remember several of these cases, #1 (yes, given all the facts I still say she was an idiot; no one with half a functioning brain puts a cupful of hot liquid between their legs!), and #9 leapt immediately to mind (yes, Mr. Duke should have been the recipient of the Darwin Award for his incredibly moronic action…had he never seen nature footage of a Killer Whale attacking a seal?).
I’d love to see a list from other countries. America certainly has our share of idiots, but they aren’t our exclusive property. Let’s see what the rest of the world has to offer!
January 28th, 2009 at 9:38 am
buc.
My ass is perfect…and my hat is cute. It has pink earflaps. And my tarts are good enough to be retarted over and over.
viva la assery.
January 28th, 2009 at 9:40 am
Telo, it is really difficult to drink coffee when your head is up your ass.
Listen, no one wants to pick on granny for an accident that burned her womb. But I would put forth the scenario that had it happened earlier in life, she wouldn’t have the ability to pollute the gene pool with more goofs who force us to put up with their slack jawed offspring.
January 28th, 2009 at 9:42 am
A friend of mine, was once late for a bus. He ran after it, clapping on the door, The Bus driver was so shocked, he stopped the Bus imedietly while my friend stumble and falls right under the front wheel. he then lay more then 2 hours, with his leg stuck underneath the wheel, waiting to be rescued. he did´nt broke any bones but he did get a skin transplanstation.
he then sue the bus company and won his case. Gaining 400000kr mutiply with 5 and you have the current in dollars..
January 28th, 2009 at 9:42 am
Callie – now everyone in the office is wondering what I’m laughing at. I’m probably going to be sued for lack of productivity. Not the least of which the time I take explaining common sense to jagovs.
January 28th, 2009 at 9:53 am
Nice trolling, Bucslim and Callie.
While the interior of the mouth can handle higher heat than the exterior skin, particularly around the genital areas, there are limits to how hot that can be before burns occur. Anything that can cause third degree burns is too hot to drink. Should she have waited for it to cool off, arguably yes she should have. However, it is hardly unreasonable to think that even should you spill the entire mug onto the surface of your skin that you should go say ‘ouch’ and be a bit embarrassed at the mess, but not actually be seriously hurt by it. It is true that your skin tissues do get to be more delicate with age, but even then serious scalds should not be possible from a hot cup of coffee.
I said according to rumor meaning exactly that. It was a rumor that I heard on 770AM KKOB the local talk radio station, but have never been able to directly verify. Frankly, at the time I was in high school and couldn’t be bothered. Comment number 96 by Cminus gave a wiki link, I suggest you read through the entire thing before trolling further, it will make you more effective instead of simply sounding like an asshat looking to stir up faux controversy.
January 28th, 2009 at 9:53 am
Freshies asked in comment #98 “What about people slipping on ice and suing the owner of the sidewalk?”
This isn’t as frivolous as you would think. Both businesses and homeowners have a legal responsibility in most municipalities to clear their sidewalks of snow and ice. Here in Toronto, the bylaw requires sidewalks to be cleared within 12 hours of the last snowfall. Failure to do so can result in a fine from the city, and leaves the business or resident liable for any injuries sustained as a result. Nothing frivolous about that.
January 28th, 2009 at 9:55 am
buc, I can only imagine what working in an office with you is like. I look at the man most like what I think you’re like in my office (…maybe it’s YOU!) and just giggle.
January 28th, 2009 at 9:58 am
“While the interior of the mouth can handle higher heat than the exterior skin, particularly around the genital areas, there are limits to how hot that can be before burns occur”
Guess I should relay that to my dom next time he brings up candles and wax. Safeword is popcorn.
January 28th, 2009 at 10:02 am
Callie, I thought the candles used for that were supposed to have a lower melting point so as not to cause permanent harm? Last I checked they were pretty easy to get a hold of at any good kinky sex shop. Now that I think about it, I need to go get some for the next bridal shower I’m hosting….
January 28th, 2009 at 10:04 am
What about the guy with the $8 Millon pants in washington
January 28th, 2009 at 10:05 am
are we friends now? cause only buc gets to make fun of my ass and hat without saying sorry.
January 28th, 2009 at 10:16 am
Telo – who’s trolling?
What is painfully obvious to the rest of us is somehow being missed by you. If you piss into the wind, you’re going to get wet. If you put hot coffee next to your junk you’re going to have roasted nuts or an open faced roast beef sandwich depending on your designation. If a person has to be instructed on the intricacies of hot beverages in the no-no zone, they probably should stay home.
We shouldn’t have to tell people to put a loaded mouse trap in their pants because it’s obvious what will happen. We shouldn’t have to tell people to gargle with Draino. We shouldn’t have to tell people to not put their pets in a microwave after they’ve given them a bath. We shouldn’t have to tell people to not swallow the enema. But because some chucklehead out there actually might try this stuff, including holding the molten coffee with their thighs, that we have to put instructions on potato chip bags, shampoo bottles and lampshades.
Again, there is no defense for this.
January 28th, 2009 at 10:16 am
blitzez: we could make a TON of money where I live
Let’s go break a clavicle on public property together
January 28th, 2009 at 10:16 am
I wouldn’t say we are friends, but it is good to know we both share a sense of humor.
I’m not emotionally invested enough in the comment system to be truly offended by much.
I just remember the case pretty well and that the lady was hurt badly and shouldn’t have been. Yeah, she did something a bit dumb, but people do stupid things all the time. You do something stupid and there are consequences, in this case the consequences were way more severe than they should have been. I burn myself cooking all the time. It’s my own stupidity and I deal with it. Still if I spilt my entire coffee pot on myself, I would not expect to have 3rd degree burns. It wasn’t an unrealistic expectation that she could put her cream and sugar in, thereby cooling down the coffee some, without being seriously hurt.
My entire high school went to that McDonald’s for off campus lunches and enough of them had directly told the staff the coffee was too hot that it wasn’t a shock that this case happened. The health department rumor was from one of the former employees who called in to the radio station. In New Mexico, we love hot foods. It has to be pretty damn hot for the locals not to be able to eat or drink it. The shock was really that the case got national attention and that the lady was so severely hurt. The entire state of New Mexico has the same area code, 505, which says a lot about the size of the population.
January 28th, 2009 at 10:20 am
Callie – Who’s making fun of your ass? I just wished you’d send me the pictures you promised.
January 28th, 2009 at 10:21 am
I agree that these are dumb, except the 7 inch knife in the bread. That does seem rather nasty and dangerous or is that just me? Plus the poor granny, i was a nurse, 3rd degree burns are nasty! I also worked at burger king and even before the lawsuit deal we were supposed to check the coffee temp every morning because the machine can over heat the coffee.
January 28th, 2009 at 10:27 am
Callie, send them to jfrater, he could do a best pictures of Callies ass.
January 28th, 2009 at 10:29 am
A woman sued Kraft for fraud when she thought they guacamole didn’t have enough avacado…
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003454425_guacamole30.html
January 28th, 2009 at 10:32 am
I’ve read ALL the comments and I still think the lady who sued McDonald’s is an idiot.
January 28th, 2009 at 10:35 am
After reading the link JT posted I have to agree with him/her. No food or beverage you buy should be hot enough to cause 3rd degree burns. If it’s that unsafe to spill on yourself than it’s that unsafe to put in your mouth
January 28th, 2009 at 10:40 am
Here’s my own personal story: When I was a freshman in college, living in the dorms, I stubbed my toe on my bed. My toe got a nasty infection and I had to have surgery to fix it. How all that happened from stubbing my toe, I have no idea. I had to take Vicodin for a couple weeks and limp around for months while it healed. I didn’t sue.
Another story I’ve mentioned before here: I almost died when I was young because I rode my bike off a small cliff in my neighberhood into some boulders. I spent 4 weeks in the hospital with a lacerated liver, broken ribs, and bruised lungs, and 6 months without doing anything more physical than walking so I wouldn’t reopen the wound in my liver. I (along with my family) could’ve totally sued the city for not putting up warnings or a fence along that cliff. We didn’t.
January 28th, 2009 at 10:44 am
#2 looks like the weather man has a boner lol
January 28th, 2009 at 10:47 am
lol
January 28th, 2009 at 10:49 am
Telo, let them have their fun. I think it’s cute, but entertaining. I think they’ve both earned their List-wings.
Coffee is hot, people, whether it’s rediculously or mildly hot. If she had sense enough not to drive, she should’ve known that she had other issues in motor functions. The jury must have been song and danced like in Chicago. I hate McDonald’s, too, but Stella, the namesake of the Stella Awards (as mentioned), deserves to be at the ridicule of the world. McDonald’s was stupid for not taking the earlier litigation amounts, but this case was not worth multi-millions. I wouldn’t have kept it- I would have returned it or donated the remainder. She stupid and greedy.
January 28th, 2009 at 10:52 am
bucslim – “I don’t sue other people for my stupidity.”
Good point, what she did was pretty stupid. I just think her only defense was the fact that McDonalds was making their coffee “hotter” than it needed to be for drinking and like any other person she was gonna ride that train for as much money as possible. You can serve hot coffee at boiling temperature, but does it really need to be that hot?
As for this list, good one, especially the Killer Whale one, stupid “Moran” haha. But honestly the ones that hit a soft spot for me were #6 and #8.
#6 because a similar case happened this past New Years where I live. Very sad. A BART (public transit) officer shot and killed a 22 year old man who was cuffed and face down with another officer on top of him, claiming he was going for his taser. Even worse, clear video of the incident is all over YouTube and it has been shown on the local news. Here’s the link to one of the many articles.
http://www.ktvu.com/news/18475843/detail.html
Ironically, number 8 happened to me yesterday. I was eating at a cafe close to my work and felt something like a pebble or rock in my mouth while I was chewing, turned out it was a piece of glass!! There was more on my plate too. Now sure I was pissed and I probably could have gotten a good lawsuit out of it, but I was just more thankful I didn’t swallow any of it or get cut, scarred the shit out of me though. (I could have been on this list which I’m sure you would all LOVE) Anyways, a few months ago I also had a friend find a Screw in her food at a different resturaunt. So, having a knife baked in bread is not that far fetched I think.
Good List!
January 28th, 2009 at 10:54 am
Ummm – money and more money, I was reading an article a while back about some surfers on the beach.
Apparently they were sitting on their boards waiting for a good wave, and when it did one of the surfers got in the way of another guy, and he sued him for taking ” HIS ” wave.
Another nice list would be – The 20 most lamest excuses after an accident.
Well done.
January 28th, 2009 at 10:54 am
Comment #31, the pants thing, was covered in another list I believe. Anyone got the link?
January 28th, 2009 at 10:59 am
The other issue with the McDonald’s case, and what gave her punitive damages so high, was that it was discovered that McDonald’s heated their coffee to a temperature that would prevent it from cooling down over the course of an average sit down McDonald’s breakfast. As a result, fewer people would get free refills which supposedly saved McDonald’s millions a year. The issue was the coffee was hot enough to cause third degree burns, and this was done for the sake of a larger profit. That’s a hard one to get past a jury…
January 28th, 2009 at 11:01 am
Oh, how about when Spike Lee sued Spike TV claiming that they ‘hijacked’ his name??
http://www.dailyhaggis.com/2003/07/08/spike-lee-vs-spiketv-lawsuit-settled/
January 28th, 2009 at 11:09 am
I used to work for a veterinarian who was married to high-end defense attorney.
there was a case here in Fort Lauderdale when a burglar broke into a family home. while in this house illegally, stealing items of value, the family dog, a labrador retriever, attacked the criminal and bite him quite severely on his leg. the family returned home to find the dog sitting in front of the hall closet, wagging his tail. when the husband opened the door, the criminal had wrapped himself in jackets & was cowering in the back, with blood all over the floor & clothes.
this individual managed to sue this family & WON!(soemwhere in the $10,000 range for hospital care & suffering) the reasoning? the dog owner’s family did not have a “Beware of Dog” sign placed every 10 feet around the perimeter of the fencing!
that’s screwed up.
ringtailroxy
January 28th, 2009 at 11:13 am
Haha, love no.9 “….a 27 year old moran ” Great!
No.7, if I found a massive blade in my sandwich, Id probably sue too! (If I was in America, people arent too bothered about suing in England.)
January 28th, 2009 at 11:13 am
The stupid PETA lawsuit makes we want to go have some sea kitten for dinner in their honor.
January 28th, 2009 at 11:16 am
yup…only in America!
87. adoh: so did I!
People will sue for anything. The sad ones are for someone being stupid and getting killed and their family sues because of it. If you were being stupid…you deserve your fate! I don’t blame the animals (like the elephant who took out the trainer or the panda who got that guy who wanted a hug from the panda!) I blame the stupid people! People, who for whatever mental breakdown that caused them to “check out” of reality, got themselves killed. Less stupid people in the world….that’s what we need.
We also need to stop these stupid lawsuits. They waste time and money…however, they are good for a chuckle or two.
January 28th, 2009 at 11:19 am
That way, people can make a lot of money. next time a “accident” occure i will diffenitly have too consider more then twice if can to sue somebody….
January 28th, 2009 at 11:22 am
I am sueing http://www.listverse.com. As I was reading this list I laughed. I happened to be drinking chocolate milk at the time and sprayed it all over my new Chuck Norris t-shirt. I am sueing 25 euro for the t-shirt and 200 million in damages due to stress and anxiety since the incident. I cannot sleep as I am in fear of Chuck Norris coming into my house and decapitating me with a roundhouse kick for spilling milk on a t-shirt with a picture him on it.
Show me the money JFrater!!
January 28th, 2009 at 11:26 am
92. TMX
Thanks for that information regarding the orca. For some reason, though I feel bad for the folks whose lives were lost, I am relieved to read that the whale was not, in fact, attempting to kill anyone. Are you a marine biologist, perchance?
January 28th, 2009 at 11:36 am
Chuck Norris has no weapons, he is one.
January 28th, 2009 at 11:40 am
Awesome list!
January 28th, 2009 at 11:49 am
” McDonald’s was stupid for not taking the earlier litigation amounts, but this case was not worth multi-millions. I wouldn’t have kept it- I would have returned it or donated the remainder. She stupid and greedy.”
You’re absolutely right, it wasn’t a multi-million dollar case. It was a case that should have covered the cost of her hospital stay, and that’s about it. She should have just asked for the money to cover the cost of skin gafts.
Oh wait. She did. McDonald’s refused. And again and again. I don’t agree that the woman should have gotten millions of dollars out of it, but if it takes millions of dollars to make McDonalds change their underhanded policies, maybe that’s the way it has to be. Look at it this way, they only need one multi-million dollar suit to change their ways.
January 28th, 2009 at 11:51 am
Telo, people do indeed do dumb things all the time. The point is they don’t deserve $600,000 for being dumb.
Buc, I would send pics, but you’d just mess them up
January 28th, 2009 at 11:54 am
great pictures! the weather man and the PETA one are hillarious.
January 28th, 2009 at 12:19 pm
hahaha, at the pic on #4. ya just gotta hate PETA.
January 28th, 2009 at 12:32 pm
Tsiamon – put it this way. You come to my house. You say you’d like to have some coffee. I make some and give it to you. You put the cup of hot coffee in your crotch and some of it spills on your package. On what fucking planet is that my responsibility? I didn’t tie you to the chair with your legs splayed out and poured the coffee in the cup between your legs.
If you ask for a dry ice smoothie and put that between your legs are you going sue me for frozen junk?
What if the lady placed the cup on her head and tried to balance it there while they were driving and got burned when Junior pulled a Starsky and Hutch? I know it sounds stupid, but hot fresh coffee doesn’t belong in a cup on your head OR BETWEEN YOUR LEGS!!
I can’t control what you do with the hot or cold beverages you purchase. If you purchase a badger and he happens to rip your thorax off after you put it between your legs, that’s on you too. You know why? Badgers are ferocious critters and are known to get nasty when they are held down. Hot coffee wasn’t meant to be placed in your crotch during the cooling down process.
January 28th, 2009 at 12:33 pm
#6 is not a frivolous lawsuit at all. Far from it. Here in the Bay area we just had another incident. A BART police officer apparently killed a suspect by mistake, thinking he’d drawn his Taser instead of his pistol. It ended up causing a riot in Oakland a couple of days later.
They must make tasers that are brightly colered and have a clearly indentifiable (by touch) grip.
January 28th, 2009 at 12:39 pm
haha those peta guys most really hate picture 4. im sure they are getting their vegetables ready 8-I
January 28th, 2009 at 12:43 pm
If I know something (drink, food, plate, whatever…) is going to be hot, I don’t put it anywhere near a sensitive skin area, especially near the crotch. Cold drinks held between the legs? Fine. Coffee, hot cocoa? Hell no, it either stays on the dashboard with a hand outstretched to hold it up (and a small wedge of napkins wrapped around it if there’s no holders) or I wait till I find a table after I get out of the car.
January 28th, 2009 at 12:49 pm
Great list.
The situation in number 6 is kind of complicated though… I’m not sure how I feel about that one.
January 28th, 2009 at 12:56 pm
And PETA. It’s too bad about them. I think the message they try to convey is a good one… I like animals too… but the way they do it just makes people resentful and brings ridicule to themselves… therefore counteracting their message… and probably making it worse for the animals they wish to save.
January 28th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
bucslim wrote: And you wonder why there are instructions for using shampoo, and warnings on hair dryers to not be used while bathing in the tub. Congratulations, we now have to dumb everything down so that the people who used to be scratched out due to natural selection are now being rewarded for their gran-mal shitheadedness.
LOL! Gran-mal shitheadedness! That is absolutely the right term for it!
Awesome list damien! Well done, my little smoking monkey, well done! Now get back to rubbing my shoulders!
January 28th, 2009 at 1:23 pm
The McDonalds lawsuit is legit. McDonalds mgt said they knew their coffee was hot enough to burn people, but the percentage of victims would be too small for them to lower the temeprature. The jury wanted to make a statement to McDs that it wasn’t OK to burn only a small percentage of their customers, that is why the person was awrded so much.
January 28th, 2009 at 1:23 pm
Another voice in favor of poor, maligned Stella. As I recall, not only was she so severely injured, she only went to court because McD’s refused to help with her medical bills. All she wanted FROM the lawsuit was the cost of court and the medical expenses.
The judge, however, read McD’s full history regarding coffee-related injuries. The company had been cited multiple times in the past, and HAD NOT CHANGED POLICY. Each time, the fine was only a few thousand dollars; not enough for the company to even notice. So he decided to do something to get their attention.
Stella did not ask for millions of dollars. The judge presiding over the case – since he could not levy fines over the offense, only declare an amount of money that McDonalds owed Stella – awarded her an amount of money equal to one day’s worth of coffee sales from McDonald’s. He did this to punish the company for its gross negligence in the only way that he could.
January 28th, 2009 at 1:24 pm
143. Kiribub
Ha, nope I am not a marine biologist in the least. Perhaps I should have become one though. Several months ago one of my “wikihunts” as I like to call them led me to something about whales. It then hit me that in my elementry school years I was actually really into whales. So I stayed on this track of just looking up various things that I felt compelled to learn more about.
Long story short my discovery of the information I gave was based out of finding out just how many “Shamus” there were. I mean, SeaWorld has assembled the lineage of Shamu in such a way that you could legitmately think there are only legitmately these three whales (Shamu, Baby Shamu, Grandbaby Shamu) and you can believe that when you are only 10 or 11 years old. Once you get older, though, you realize there is probably a little more to it. Inevitably you end up finding out about all the incidents that each whale has been involved with.
It leaves me with mixed feelings about the whole thing. Undoubtedly “Shamu” is probably the most well-known whale and played a key part in orcas becoming such a beloved animal. As such there is a lot of people who are able to learn about them. But of course it comes at the cost of keeping these animals in capatvity. Now with most animals I don’t have a problem that certain numbers are kept in captivity so long as they are treated well by the institution that is responsible for them and given their space. Whales of this size really need to be given more room than any capativity and some of the stories can be pretty heartbreaking when it comes to them reacting negatively to their captive enviroment. And that alone only scratches the whole issue of the conservation of marine life.
So no, I’m just a dude who likes whales. I’m very much into the idea of there being so much undiscovered marine animals in the deep sea (my mind knows Carcharodon megalodon can’t possibly be alive, but my heart wishes otherwise) and the appreciation of the size of some the creatures that inhabit the ocean. I’ve been lucky enough to see some pretty impressive breaches by humpback whales at a relatively close distance – such things really do humble you, realize your place in the world, and give you an appreciation for what such animals are capable of doing.
A little longwinded and off point, I know. At least it breaks up all the comments about how stupid you may or may not be to spill coffee on yourself and make a lawsuit about it.
January 28th, 2009 at 1:27 pm
The reason that these lawsuits continue is that they pay-off.
A young lady I know slipped on ice going into the school one morning and broke her ankle. She was awarded $100,000 dollars, 70 grand after the lawyer took his cut. Which of course I’m paying through my taxes. The fact that 2000 other kids managed to traverse the snow and ice without incident didn’t count for anything. It’s winter in Canada; there is going to be ice and snow. You are supposed to take extra care. (The girl in question is a klutz). Paid her for what they figured her sore ankle, swelling up in bad weather or after standing on it all day, was worth. C’mon everybody has something that gives them trouble from time to time, we just all don’t cash in on it.
That said the McDonald’s case is different. They had ample warning about the nuclear quality of their coffee and the flimsy inadequate protection their lids and cups provided. They consciously decided that the benefit of doing something about it was more costly than putting up with 700 or so cases a year. They deserved what they got for being so callous with other folks’ well-being.
January 28th, 2009 at 1:43 pm
Christ, I just looked at #4 again. PETA is insane for defending the defenseless, and those two douchebags in the photo are what, normal?
January 28th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
http://www.stellaawards.com/stella.html
Stella was an idiot and deserved nothing.
January 28th, 2009 at 1:50 pm
When I first opened this page I thought to myself…is it just a coincidence that there are 3 separate law firm ads at the top of the page? After reading the list, and the comments, I thought nooo…no coincidence there lol. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, some people just shouldn’t be allowed to breed.
January 28th, 2009 at 1:53 pm
OK, I just read the wiki article on the coffee lady and I just cant belive that she won that case. She put a cup of hot coffee between her legs and then proceeded to spill THE ENTIRE CONTENTS of said cup on herself. Now, I am trying to keep in mind that she was 79 but sitting in a puddle of hot liquid, wearing super absorbent cotton pants for 90 seconds… She was only 20% responsible?!? And what % of responsibility does her grandson have? He seems to have just sat there (maybe he was too busy calling the lawyer to actually try to help granny…) It´s just stupid.
And these laws syaing that I am responsible if you slip on ice in front of my house?!? Shouldn´t it be the city´s responsibility to keep roads and sidewalks clear?
And dont get me started on those that state that a homeowner is responsible if someone has too much to drink at their home…
All these laws do is pander to the inability of some to take responsibility for their own actions.
(And yes, the phallic storm cloud in #2 has me giggling every time I see it!
)
January 28th, 2009 at 1:58 pm
161. YogiBarrister
in this case PETA isn’t “insane for defending the defenseless.” it’s insane for for staging a protest against the culling and hunting of deer as a population control in areas where humans have long since eliminated their natural predators, then being injured by one of those very same, precious, defenseless deer on the way home and SUING on the grounds that a “deer management program, which includes, in certain circumstances, an affirmative effort to increase deer population,” caused their car crash.
basically suing because the very management program the were protesting in SUPPORT of had, in their own view, led to their injuries. that what we call ironic, and asinine.
January 28th, 2009 at 2:02 pm
Oh, and a couple more thing (from a link provided above):
“The plaintiffs were apparently able to document 700 cases of burns from McDonald’s coffee over 10 years, or 70 burns per year. But that doesn’t take into account how many cups are sold without incident. A McDonald’s consultant pointed out the 700 cases in 10 years represents just 1 injury per 24 million cups sold! For every injury, no matter how severe, 23,999,999 people managed to drink their coffee without any injury whatever. Isn’t that proof that the coffee is not “unreasonably dangerous”?”
And then it says…
“The National Coffee Association recommends coffee be brewed at “between 195-205 degrees Fahrenheit for optimal extraction” and drunk “immediately”. If not drunk immediately, it should be “maintained at 180-185 degrees Fahrenheit.” ”
Sorry, there´s just no getting around it: the case is just retarted.
January 28th, 2009 at 2:07 pm
160. Mom424 : It isnt 700 a year… It was 700 cases in 10 years…
January 28th, 2009 at 2:23 pm
Lo #165, I agree that PETA’s lawsuit is worthy of this list. My point was that the two grinning douchebags in the photo are loathesome, utterly vile, lacking purpose. I don’t mind sharing the planet with eccentric humans like PETA memnbers. Those two f&%kwads, not so much.
January 28th, 2009 at 2:23 pm
Regarding #1; Doesn’t it say CAUTION: CONTENTS HOT on the side of the can?
January 28th, 2009 at 2:27 pm
GTT – I stand corrected. Makes little difference; they still knew and didn’t fix anything until they lost a zillion dollars. I do resent the little old lady being portrayed as a greedy conniver – she didn’t really request much more than her costs; it was the lawyers and jurors who made the award so ridiculous.
January 28th, 2009 at 2:54 pm
seinfeld did an episode on the same thing as #1 and kramer ended up with the lawsuit. i dont see how #8 is so bizarre, if i found a knife in my food id sue subway too, lol.
January 28th, 2009 at 2:54 pm
Im gonna sue McDonalds for making me a fat ass. After all they did MAKE me drive there everyday and force it down my throat.
January 28th, 2009 at 3:09 pm
Mom424: True. The jurors and her attornies made it bad and she was made to look bad because of it.
Still…she did spill coffee on herself. She does have herself to blame. That’s my 2 cents.
January 28th, 2009 at 3:13 pm
Mom424:
In one of the links above (and I stated the piece in one of my above posts), it says that the National Coffee Association recommends coffee being served at the exact temperature McDonalds was serving it. It has to do with the oils and extracting the full flavor of the coffee from the bean. What is so wrong with serving coffee at the prescribed correct temperature?
January 28th, 2009 at 3:28 pm
After reading all the comments, it seems that people knew McDonald Coffee was served in flimsy cups and lids inadequate for the degree of heat of the liquid.
So why would you buy coffee there in the first place?!
January 28th, 2009 at 3:42 pm
63. Bad Hair Bear and 85. GTT – Both of the cases I mentioned had won Stella Awards, so I assume this means that whoever hands out the Stella Awards had researched them and found the cases to be real. I also assume that my law lecturer had checked up on them as well. For memory the proper case citation had been given. I am willing to be corrected though.
January 28th, 2009 at 3:43 pm
As a law student I’ve seen many of these cases before, especially the ones where people have won.
The McDonalds case is a classic example of people making snap judgments without having all the details of the case: in that case the coffee was not merely ‘hot’ it was so hot that it caused third-degree burns to the woman’s thighs, bad enough that they required a skin graft. Serving a beverage at a temperature hot enough to CHAR SKIN (the definition of a third-degree burn) is a clear and obvious case of negligence.
January 28th, 2009 at 3:44 pm
Woman on “Man Vs Anheuser-Busch”
– who is it?
January 28th, 2009 at 3:46 pm
lol good list!! i knew of someone once who was gonna sue burger king for not making his ice cream the way it looked on their board. god some people are such losers!
January 28th, 2009 at 3:57 pm
#1 is one of the stupidest lawsuits ever. McD’s aught to get their money back. Stupid bitch.
January 28th, 2009 at 4:05 pm
176. tookyb
I am not doubting you, just merely wondering at the irrationality of these cases… It seems almost too idiotic to believe, does it not?
What surprises me the most are the judges who award these ridiculous settlements. Do they get a cut or are they just that plain retarted?
January 28th, 2009 at 4:06 pm
#169 “Regarding #1; Doesn’t it say CAUTION: CONTENTS HOT on the side of the can?”
LOL,
If they served their coffee in a can, that would be reason to sue alone right there. X-D
January 28th, 2009 at 4:19 pm
Maybe the old lady just finished smoking a fat one and spilt coffee on herself.
January 28th, 2009 at 4:27 pm
Q: What do you call 1000 dead personal injury lawyers?
A: A good start.
January 28th, 2009 at 4:44 pm
If it were me, I would have taken all of these people out back and shot them. These people are motivated by nothing more than greed, and not by retrieving reasonable compensation for anything. It’s either that, or they’re incredibly dim-witted. Either way, is this really what we are coming to?
January 28th, 2009 at 4:52 pm
62. damien_karras – January 28th, 2009 at 7:42 am
Wally: whats a YANK? It sounds vagely dirty
A ‘Yank’ is slang for ‘American’, short for Yankee. The Aussie rhyming slang is ‘Septic tank’. Which would you prefer?
Nice list by the way. Certainly got people going!!
January 28th, 2009 at 5:07 pm
Finally, a good list! The recent lists have been boring. I wish each case had a little more info, though.
January 28th, 2009 at 5:13 pm
Lizzie: I’m a Yankee? Where’s my multi-million sign on bonus?
January 28th, 2009 at 5:23 pm
i wish people would research the mcdonald’s coffee incident more because it’s almost always presented out of context. the coffee burned the woman’s skin off like acid, she had to stay in the hospital for eight days to get skin grafts, and two years of treatment followed that. the only reason she sued was because mcdonald’s refused to help her pay the medical bills. it’s common knowledge that coffee is hot, but it just isn’t supposed to be so dangerous.
January 28th, 2009 at 5:47 pm
Not to pick nits, but for #5? It’s actually spelled Madera, not Medera. I should know, I was born and raised there and live there right now
January 28th, 2009 at 5:48 pm
Oops, #6, not #5. My bad Jfrater!
January 28th, 2009 at 5:57 pm
I just wrecked my car last spring when driving down HWY 1 on the California coast. A doe and a fawn ran across the road in front of me and I swerved to avoid them. I went off the road directly onto sand, and was not able to brake or steer. I hit a tree. Luckily, the tree was not hurt, my dogs and I in the car were not hurt, and most importantly the deer were not hurt. My car was totalled, but that’s what insurance is for. It would NEVER occur to me to sue the wildlife agency or the highway builders, or ANYONE! I LOVE to see wildlife, which is why I live where I do, and it would have devestated me to hit the deer, especially the fawn. I can’t see how a person of integrity could try to turn an accident into a lawsuit. It is pure, unadulterated greed.
As the Bible say, “The love of money is the root of all evil.” (Oops! I hope I didn’t open up a whole new can of worms by quoting the Bible! Sorry, folks!)
January 28th, 2009 at 5:58 pm
“says”
January 28th, 2009 at 6:24 pm
What about the few people out there who have sued fast food restaurants for making them fat???
January 28th, 2009 at 6:35 pm
192. BooRadley: Boo, Hwy 1 is the main road through the Village where I live, on CA. central coast! I can imagine you having that accident quite close to where I live.
I’m glad to hear you weren’t hurt, nor were the dogs, nor the deer (who tend to treat my garden as their own private salad bar!).
I wouldn’t live anywhere else.
January 28th, 2009 at 6:53 pm
Actually, the McDonald’s lawsuit was actually of great benefit to the McDonald’s corporation, no matter how much money they had to pay out. The lawsuit was so big in the United States that every news station, not to mention late night talk shows, carried the story.
This amounted to hours upon hours of national media exposure. In talking to an advertisement exec. he informed me that the sheer amount of time that McDonald’s name was said on air would have cost almost a billion dollars, it’s kinda hard to estimate. Compound that with the fact that everyone in America was talking about McDonald’s only helped them more. Especially since they had to pay what seems like so much meant the average person thought if they went to McDonald’s, they could become accidental millionaires too.
The lawsuit was the greatest advertising campaign ever put together.
January 28th, 2009 at 7:33 pm
While I was in high school I worked at a fast-food chain. One morning during an ice storm, I was working the drive-thru, passing out drinks and food to the customers, mostly through their open car doors because all their windows were frozen shut. A woman pulled up to my window in her mini-van, looking harrassed and annoyed, and nearly yanked the small coffe and bagel out of my hands, not even bothering to say thank-you or “have a nice day.” To make matters worse, before I could pull my hand out from behind her car door (her window had frozen shut as well), she slammed the door shut, smashing my hand inbetween the door and the car frame and breaking it, two fingers, and my wrist in eight different places.
Not only did this woman refuse to pay for my medical bills “because I didn’t perform my job properly”, but she had the gall to sue seven months later because of damage caused to her car door/window, and for the emotional distress I put her children through, who were in the backseat of the mini-van during the incident, and witnessed their mother mauling the bejeezus out of my poor appendage.
The case was ultimately dismissed before it even made it to court, my bones healed just fine (apart from the occasional stiffness during changes in the weather) and I haven’t seen that oh-so-pleasant woman since. The only regret I have from my incident is that I didn’t manage to spill the woman’s coffee all over her before my hand was smushed, but then again, she probably would have sued me for that too and, by the looks of this list, she would have won!
January 28th, 2009 at 7:53 pm
1 is not a frivolous case, believe it or not. I read an article about it, and she did have some pretty good points (she got second degree burns due to the fact that she was wearing a suit that held the coffee against her skin, also I believe over 50 percent of her body was burnt). Although, “hot coffee” means hot coffee
January 28th, 2009 at 7:59 pm
Also, I remember reading about this one where a woman was looking through a phone book for a doctor to do liposuction on her, and she found a dermatologist, who botched the job. Then she sued the PHONE COMPANY for not stating that the dermatologist wasn’t certified to do liposuction.
January 28th, 2009 at 8:13 pm
Great list, the one about the taser doesn’t seem that stupid, although maybe the police officer should be sued. Don’t tase me bro!
speaking of PETA, they’re petitioning to have fish renamed “sea kittens”! That’s hilarious.
January 28th, 2009 at 9:01 pm
if i found a goddamn knife in my sandwhich, subway better have plenty of moolah to keep me quiet
January 28th, 2009 at 9:02 pm
oh and every time peta does something retarded, i bake a kitten.
its gamey
January 28th, 2009 at 9:03 pm
and comment #27 is hilarious
January 28th, 2009 at 9:07 pm
#184, Matt123: You’ll appreciate this one…
Why does New Jersey have the toxic waste dumps and New York have all the lawyers??
Because New Jersey got first pick.
January 28th, 2009 at 9:09 pm
segue (195):
I live in Eureka, and was on my way down to visit some friends at Sea Ranch. Have you been there? It is so beautiful. I love the coast, too, as do my dogs. I have one who swims in the ocean, and one who doesn’t even like to get his paws wet. They both love to run and chase balls and play with other dogs… I know they’re both convinced that everytime I go to work, I’m actually going to the beach without them. Poor things! Yeah, Cali can be wonderful!
January 28th, 2009 at 9:14 pm
My dad once had a dentist break off a drill bit in his upper jaw, then cover it with a filling and tell him to wait and see what happens… after weeks of headaches, dad went to a doctor who told him (after an x-ray) that the bit had pierced his sinus and was working its way towards his brain, and had caused permenent nerve damage.
Dad sued (ever heard of a better reason?) and the doctor said the wrong thing by accident on the witness stand. The dentist, to my extreme annoyance, got off scott free.
Just for clarification here… dad didn’t want to sue, i convinced him to. In my mind, the whole point of suing is to correct a problem. Some people seem to be expounding on how they didn’t sue when something bad happened to them… well, I’m sorry, if you don’t want the money, donate it or something, but if a company or council or individual is causing danger or suffering, and it’s within their power to fix it, suing is a way (admittedly, a last resort) to get them to put up.
I mean, usually these things seem to happen because they don’t want to spend time or money fixing a problem or mistake in the first place… being able to sue is being given a certain amount of power.
It requires responsibility sure, but that doesn’t mean you never use it. That’s almost as bad as using it the way some of these people did.
January 28th, 2009 at 9:43 pm
i want to sue al gore for global warming.
January 28th, 2009 at 9:43 pm
i want to sue God for dying.
January 28th, 2009 at 9:44 pm
i want to sue santa claus for not existing.
January 28th, 2009 at 9:57 pm
If anyone looked at the info provided online about Tillikum, the KILLER whale, it is made quite clear that he was not responsible for either death. The first death, of a trainer, was caused by the two female whales he was living with. The trainer fell into their pool and they proceeded to play “catch” with her; she died of drowning. As for the unfortunate Mr. Dukes, he died of hypothermia. Neither time did Tillikum harm anyone.
I once was having dinner at a very fancy restaurant in celebration of my grandfather’s 85th birthday, and I found a metal shaving in my dessert. I just asked if I could have a new one
January 28th, 2009 at 10:03 pm
194. Jenna_Bug
Depending on the dates the are citing it is not as ridiculous as a lawsuit as you may initially think. Keep in mind that McDonald’s and other fast food chains did not provide any nutritional information publicly (at least not to the point where it was posted inside; I’m unsure of if you could have asked and received it) until the mid 90’s. Some people use the argument that though they knew the food was probably unhealthy they did not think it was THAT unhealthy. My mom has expressed such things to me and admits she probably wouldn’t have taken us as often as we went if she knew just how unhealthy it was. So it is not completely unthinkable that a case with that premise might actually be given serious consideration.
200. MPW
And that is Stephen Colbert suggested that must mean we are now to now call cats “land fish.” Mmmm mmm, I sure love me some fried land fish.
January 28th, 2009 at 10:12 pm
Lots of fastfood restaurants are offering hot drinks that are way beyond the normal temperature. We should all be suing them until they get their jobs done right! (This rant is actually my first post here… way to start my Listverse life!)
January 28th, 2009 at 10:38 pm
Amen, DerShmoo (#3) – I was expecting the same thing; I must admit I was disappointed. The pictures searched for this list were quite good – especialy loved the PETA photo – and totally agree with it as well.
January 29th, 2009 at 1:36 am
With regards the Sea Kitten thing. No problem, when I get attacked by A Great White Pointer Sea Kitten I will sue PETA for giving it such a misleadingly cute name. With all those supermodel members they should be good for several tens of Millions
The lost pants first mentioned in #31 just stuns me in that the plaintiff was a judge so you would think he might have some idea what a truly stupid waste of court time it would be.
Cheers
Lee
January 29th, 2009 at 1:38 am
LOL as the page refreshed after the last post what should the ad be Kayak with Killer whales LOL
Cheers
Lee
January 29th, 2009 at 1:39 am
The Budweiser man should have been slapped on the way out of the courtroom.
And as for the old broad…first of all NOBODY should be eating that trash…McDonald’s is bad for your colon and the leading cause of obesity. Secondly, she should not have put that hot coffee between her old ass knee caps. She is old enough. She should know better. No pity for her.
January 29th, 2009 at 1:48 am
I dunno, some of these dumbasses might be onto something…
Think about it. Arbitrary accidents like some of those mentioned above can happen to pretty well anyone, right? So capitalize on it- the world hates you for a week, then they forget about it and move onto a new scandal (except when it comes up again on websites like this one)- you endure the hatred for that week, show up in court and cry a few times, and you’re a million dollars richer.
Well hell, I’d consider it.
On another note, I remember reading several years ago about a couple who sued a bottle water company for some ridiculous amount of money because there was a dead fly in one of the bottles. The wife, who was pregnant at the time, said the discovery completely traumatized her, gave her nightmares, and made her anxious about drinking water and taking showers. I don’t recall the outcome of the case. But, y’know, send the water back and get a new one?
My other favourites are those chubsters who sued McDonalds for making them fat- okay even if you didn’t know just *how* bad it was for you, how much education do you need to not wolf down a Big Mac, fries and coke for lunch everyday? In high school I ate poutine (Canadian dish- fries, cheese and gravy), a chicken burger and coke from a chip truck everyday for awhile. I didn’t know how many calories there were in that meal. I gained 10 pounds. I didn’t sue the chip truck for giving me food I’d paid for.
As for the “ridiculous warnings” some people have mentioned, I always liked the one posted on some chainsaws- “Do not attempt to stop with your hands or genitals.”
January 29th, 2009 at 2:06 am
176. Tookyb
I’m not suggesting that snopes is the be-all and end-all when it comes to these cases, but it tends to be pretty darn accurate most of the time.
Cruise Control – the snopes entry states that this case was listed as a false entry to the Stella awards.
Microwaved Pet – no mention of the Stella awards, but cites many varied examples of the story which have been told for decades.
January 29th, 2009 at 2:22 am
Oh, and Tookyb.. I really hate being a spoil sport but the burglar locked in a garage doesn’t seem to be true either.
January 29th, 2009 at 2:26 am
Jessy (217)
HA! Too funny! Now, WHO would be stupid enough to try to stop a chainsaw with their genitals?
Only an asshat retarted moran, that’s who!
January 29th, 2009 at 2:35 am
I think the McDonald’s case is misunderstood. From what I had heard, the coffee was hot enough to melt the fabric in her pants. The woman had 3rd degree burns on her genitals. That’s too damn hot.
January 29th, 2009 at 2:51 am
Has anyone noticed how number 2 looks like a penis?
January 29th, 2009 at 4:19 am
Kailum – if you R-E-A-D the comments above, you will notice that, yes, at least two people have. For example:
87 adoh
I saw phallic imagery in number 2.
129 Simons
#2 looks like the weather man has a boner lol
January 29th, 2009 at 5:11 am
Heard about the one with the ski resort. Its not bizzare or frivolous but funny. There was a ski resort (forgot where) which was sued several times a year by visitors who received injuries through skiing accidents. The resort management consulted lawyers and were told to put up a large wirning sign on the mouantain side to warn skiers to be careful. The next season, the first skier to take to the slopes crashed into the sign board and sued the resort for putting up a signboard that endangered skiers!
All this talk about people being stupid and PETA being nuts reminded me of what Chris Rock said when one of the tigers attacked Siegfried (or was it Roy?) in Las Vegas. “Everybody says that the tiger went crazy and attacked the guy. The tiger didn’t go crazy. The tiger went tiger!!”
January 29th, 2009 at 6:55 am
It’s human stupidity and selfishness like this that makes me want to fucking hurt myself. Funny how all these lawsuits are American, too. Jesus.
January 29th, 2009 at 9:12 am
Ugh, I hate how everyone makes fun of the poor woman in #1. Yes, it does sound ridiculous she sued because the coffee was too hot, but when she obtained THIRD DEGREE BURNS and extensive damage to her genital area you have to think that was one really frickin’ hot coffee.
January 29th, 2009 at 10:50 am
I may have missed it if someone else here has asked, or if it has already been answered, but what is the rationale behind PETA & the Sea Kitten thing? It sounds a bit fishy to me!
January 29th, 2009 at 10:53 am
#1 has always been misrepresented. McDonald’s overheated their coffee above standards so it would stay hot all day therefore it would avoid costs by brewing several times a day.
January 29th, 2009 at 11:16 am
No it didn’t mongo.
January 29th, 2009 at 11:52 am
The number one story is misleading. The coffee was OVER 170 degrees, which was at the time, a McDonald’s standard. Just so you know, this is 30-40 degrees hotter than any other main chain of restaurants sold coffee at. It was completely McDonald’s fault and in the lawsuit they admitted that they know keeping the coffee that hot was dangerous, but it tasted better at that temperature, and they had to brew less if they kept it consistently hot. On an even more important (and unmentioned) matter in this story, the old woman suffered 3rd degree burns to about 20% of her body as a result of the coffee spill.
January 29th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
The law professor of my legal writing class got into an extended discussion of case #1 one day. According to him Ray Kroc’s coffee policy was to brew a new batch of coffee at a fixed time interval (something like every half hour). Therefore, an entire generation of McDonald’s coffee drinkers became acustomed to to their coffee being served at a specific temperature. When Kroc died, McDonald’s changed their policy and a new batch of coffee was only brewed when the the last one was finished. To keep the appearance of freshness, McDonald’s significantly increased the temperature of the coffee. The company deliberately chose profit over public safety. There were several similiar coffee spill accidents that resulted in serious burns at around this time.
In regards to the settlement of the case, the woman’s attorney originally asked for a modest sum to cover her medical costs from the extensive burns. McDonald’s refused to negotiate. The attorneys representing McDonald’s were overheard on multiple occasions making fun of the plaintiff and the area where the trial took place, most likely influencing the jury to generously award the plaintiff. The amount the jury awarded was eventually brought down on appeal, which is what usually happens.
January 29th, 2009 at 1:36 pm
Also, everyone that has found the award amount ridiculous, McDonald’s is a multi-national corporation with millions if not billions of dollars at their disposal. They showed a disregard for public safety of an extended period of time. The slap on the wrist fines for a few hundred or thousand dollars obviously made little difference to them. The amount awarded by the jury, in this case as well as others, often has as much to do with punishing the defendant as it does rewarding the plaintiff.
January 29th, 2009 at 1:58 pm
Ouu, I love reading cases like these. In my high school, I took Law, and every Thursday my teacher would tell us about frivilous lawsuits from the States (I live in Canada).
January 29th, 2009 at 2:10 pm
You guys are still missing the point. The drive through person didn’t open the door and pour hot coffee on the old lady. SHE DID THAT HERSELF!
So why in fuck would McDonalds be responsible for something the old bag did to herself? I don’t give a shit that it was hot, it’s supposed to be hot for crying out loud. If you take the time to read the case, or post 166 you’ll notice that coffee is supposed to be served at that temperature. And the fact that millions of other people purchased and drank the coffee without any problems whatsoever. So McDonalds is responsible to pay someone who can’t hold a cup of hot coffee in her hand? What happened the other times this old lady ordered coffee from McDonalds? Did she bitch about the temperature then?
She put the cup between her legs, she didn’t have any help from a McDonalds employee. She spilled the coffee on her naughty parts and a McDonalds employee wasn’t shaking the car, or the old lady or anything else for that matter. Disregard for public safety my ass!
If you order hot coffee, you should know two things:
1. It’s hot
2. Don’t put it between your legs or anything else for that matter that might do damage to your junk, like knives, guns, uranium, or furry creatures with claws and sharp teeth.
If you’ll take the time to notice, there aren’t any cars being sold with cup holders in the middle of their seats, because the auto industry understands that most of us don’t drive around with steaming hot beverages between our thighs. Mainly because most of us who have a brain bigger than a squirrel know that it’s bumpy when we drive and that shit might ruin our day if it spills.
If some of you would just think about what happened instead of trying to defend the indefensible this thread wouldn’t last as long as it has.
January 29th, 2009 at 2:47 pm
230. Corey:
As stated in post 174, the National Coffee Association recommends coffee being served at the exact temperature McDonalds was serving it. It has to do with the oils and extracting the full flavor of the coffee from the bean. Please read above posts before stating the exact same thing that has been posted before.
And as an OCD-FYI, she suffered 3rd degree burns in 6% of her body, the rest was 2nd degree burns.
———————
227. writergal – January 29th, 2009 at 10:50 am
I may have missed it if someone else here has asked, or if it has already been answered, but what is the rationale behind PETA & the Sea Kitten thing? It sounds a bit fishy to me!
I absolutely had to check out the sea kittens thing but Websense blocks damn PETA website. All I could get is the following blurb on the Google search:
“Would people think twice about ordering fish sticks if they were called sea kitten sticks? Learn more about our ingenious campaign to save fish by changing …”
Apparently, they need a dictionary so they can look up the word “ingenious”…
I´m all for the ethical treatment of animals but these asshats are just retarted morans.
January 29th, 2009 at 3:31 pm
Bucslim, what point did I , or other people that have argued that this case is far more complex and interesting than the standard reported version of the story, miss exactly? Your point, about how in your personal opinion, hot coffee should not be held between one’s legs? I assure you I have no doubts on your feelings about handling hot liquids. I’ll even concede that your opinion has merit, and that I agree with you. However, I don’t think that is the crux of the case and I don’t think that particular detail makes the plaintiff’s claims frivolous. Apparently, a jury made up of the plaintiff’s peers, multiple judges at different levels of court, the state of New Mexico, and an independent third party arbitrator agree with me. I also don’t follow your logic in regards to McDonald’s not being liable because an employee didn’t pour the coffee on the plaintiff. If McDonald’s knowingly gave you a hamburger that it had made more dangerous (for example purposely buying sub-grade or tainted meat because it is cheap), without telling you, to maximize profit, and you put the hamburger in your mouth, chewed it, and swallowed it by yourself, McDonald’s would still be liable (I apologize for the run-on). I would also like to point out that sometime after this case went to trial, McDonald’s improved the safety features of its coffee cups, a measure that has increased both the convenience and the safety of the product.
January 29th, 2009 at 4:08 pm
Yes Nick, very well put. If they serve me bad meat and I get sick, they are liable. I wasn’t expecting to eat a maggot burger or one with spit like Rod Farva. I would expect them to compensate me for their negligence.
But if I order HOT coffee, I have a reasonable expectation that the liquid in the cup with be HOT. And as soon as the handoff is made between the drive thru person and my hand, it then becomes my responsibility to try as hard as I can to not douche with it.
McDonalds has no responsibilty to tell me that coffee is hot. I’ve learned that through a lifetime of drinking coffee. If I was an alien who landed on this planet and decided to go through the drive thru and the lady asked me if I wanted some coffee and I said yes, then and only then do I not have an expectation that coffee is served hot. So when they handed me a hot cup of coffee I would pull out my ray gun and blast them for doing so.
C’mon Nick, do you have to be told that you have to peel a bananna before you eat it? Do you have to be told to open a can of tuna before you eat that?
Would you be surprised if they handed you a cup of coffee and said it was hot?
January 29th, 2009 at 4:31 pm
RE: the McDonalds thing.
No one’s mentioned that the huge sum, the punitive damages, is different from compensatory damages – the latter is to fix the plaintiff up for medical bills, stress, etc, while the punitive part is punishment to McDonalds – i.e. because $160,000 isn’t a drop in the ocean to McDonalds, the higher amount would be awarded to financially deter them from doing it again.
Also, in relation to the actual injury – I read something a while ago that contained the words “fused” and “labia”. $2.7 mil isn’t enough. Ow.
January 29th, 2009 at 5:01 pm
Bucslim, I think our differences are opinion and not fact based, so I fear we may never be reconciled. Hot coffee should be hot, I agree. However, McDonald’s increased the danger of their product for the sake of profit, without informing the public. Their coffee was served at a specific temperature (a temperature that did not cause third degree burns) for years. A decision was made later to increase profit, which resulted in serving significantly hotter coffee. I don’t claim to speak for everyone, but while I expect my coffee to be hot, I don’t expect it to be almost boiling. There is an expectation by the customer that they will be able to consume a food or beverage at the temperature served. This expectation was reinforced by McDonald’s for years because it served coffee at a temperature lower than what caused this incident. I’ll stop there because I am starting to repeat myself. I would be interested to know your opinions on case #10 if you are feeling inclined to discuss it.
Kate, for the record, I think I did broach several of the points you have made in an earlier post, but you have broken down how to interpret the damages far more ably than I.
January 29th, 2009 at 8:00 pm
I think someone mentioned this before earlier on and it stuck with me… the average daily sales of McDonalds coffee was estimated to be easily a million plus. Thats ALOT of individual coffee sales. If ALL these cups of coffee were of this scalding hot temperature, how come noone came forward before Stella had her accident with their lips burnt off?
January 29th, 2009 at 11:17 pm
Yea I totally disagree with #1 it was not a frivolous lawsuit. that McDonalds had already been cited for serving their coffee at near boiling temps. The woman did make a mistake by putting it between her legs but she received 3rd degree burns on like 30% of her body, 3rd degree is where the skin comes off! she originally sued for medical expenses only but after they wouldnt pay her lawyer went ofter them.
January 30th, 2009 at 12:41 am
I was just wondering how many times people are going to keep repeating the same things over and over again about the McDonalds case? Three words: We. Get. It!
January 30th, 2009 at 12:44 am
Akira: I have to agree. Good debate though – but I think its safe to say that the coffee was, well…. HOT! LOL
January 30th, 2009 at 2:12 am
luckily for me; this really IS an american phenomenon.
what about the lawsuit where to fat bitches sued mc.donalds, claiming their obesity was mc.donalds fault.
i believe there also was one guy who sued his neighbour for running over his cat, even though the man never had one..
January 30th, 2009 at 2:48 am
The doppler radar one was in my hometown, Columbus Ohio.
January 30th, 2009 at 8:14 am
Father Karras, people did come forward, repeatedly, as has been mentioned above. Also, McDonald’s was warned and fined many times leading up to this incident.
January 30th, 2009 at 10:22 am
All but 1 from America.
God bless them.
Supplying the world with morons to laugh at since 1776.
January 30th, 2009 at 12:18 pm
What most people don’t realise about the McDonalds issue is that the coffee in the restaurant was proven to be significantly hotter than the industry standard, that is what a reasonable person should expect. The reason for the initial high punitive award would be to force the issue among all restaurants and thereby- presumably – protect other people from coffee that was not just hot, but hot enough to permanently damage the skin and soft tissue of a customer.
January 30th, 2009 at 12:24 pm
thisnamestaken: actually after some extensive investigation, I found numerous examples of “world-wide” idiotic lawsuits. Trust me, America doesn’t corner the market on this subject.
Look for the list soon!
January 30th, 2009 at 2:57 pm
McDonald’s coffee was not hotter than the industry standard, it was the standard according to the National Coffee Association.
January 30th, 2009 at 3:00 pm
thisnametaken-1776 isn`t that the year we sent some foreign country (the name escapes me) packing ?
January 30th, 2009 at 6:47 pm
I was a kid working at McDonald’s when #1 happened.
The guy who owned our store ordered his head manager to gather us together & give us training on “coffee safety.” Even the manager couldn’t take it seriously. For a couple of months we were forced to warn our customers that the coffee could cause injuries if improperly handled.
We just called the woman who won the suit variations of “That Crazy Old B&^%# Who Doesn’t Know that Coffee is Hot!”
January 30th, 2009 at 7:23 pm
Randallphobia: thanks for presenting yet another side of this infamous lawsuit.
January 31st, 2009 at 7:17 am
Naupolis, I went looking for facts to prove you were incorrect when you said that that was the temperature standard. But you are, in fact correct, at least at the time of the lawsuit. I based my assertion that it was above the industry standard on a comment about frivolous lawsuits, made on CBC (Canada( radio a few years ago, by, I think, a lawyer.
However, I know that Randy Cassingham, who publishes “This is True” had addressed this in another endeavour of his, the “Stella Awards”. Randy researches his stuff, and when he is -rarely- wrong, he corrects himself.As I am doing, here. (How rare is that on the Net,lol?)
If you want to read the whole, researched story, try this link
http://www.stellaawards.com Don’t forget the rest fo the story, the link to which – http://www.stellaawards.com/stella.html – is on that first page. It’s not a huge post and won’t take long to read.
January 31st, 2009 at 2:03 pm
Basic first aid care involving burns is to cool the skin down as quickly and safely as possible (safely means using cool water not ice water). Human skin, much like pig skin i.e. bacon, will continue to cook even after taken out of direct heat. I’ll agree that McDonald was at fault for having crap beverageware, but it wasn’t McDonald’s fault she wore some nylon-cotton blend that melted, that she put it between her legs (that’s as stupid as the novice seamstresses who hold pins between their teeth and never expect it could get swallowed, shredding their their throats), nor was it McD’s fault that she and her grandson let her sit in the hot liquid and clothing long enough to grow third degree burns. I was using an industrial-style, hi-temp hot glue gun at work (these things run significantly hotter than the coffee) and some glue fell on a spot between my fingers. Stupid me was feeling pressure from time constraints so instead of caring for it, I picked off the glue and continued working. It took a couple minutes it to begin to blister (2nd degree burn) and before the blister, there was AT LEAST five minutes of obnoxious itching and heat that should’ve clued me in that it probably should be tended to. The 90 seconds some people mention she sat in the coffee would do significant 1st and possibly 2nd degree damage to a large portion of her body but it wasn’t hot enough for her to sustain immediate third degree burns in that short amount of time if they had administered first aid in a timely fashion. She deserves some money for damages but not that much unless they added a stupidity and negligence clause.
January 31st, 2009 at 2:37 pm
Here’s some more involving helicopter parents that drive me crazy:
In Arizona, high school officials allowed a student to graduate after her parents threatened to sue a teacher who failed her and didn’t allow the student to receive her high school diploma.
In Ohio, a student and her mother sued a school district and 11 teachers for $6 million, arguing that the school’s grading practices punished the girl for her repeated absences. The case has been dismissed.
In Kansas, parents threatened to sue school officials after a biology teacher failed 28 of her 118 students on a project she said students plagiarized. As a result, the local school board reduced the students’ penalties and ordered the teacher to change the project’s weight within the total semester grade. The teacher resigned.
January 31st, 2009 at 6:32 pm
255. gabi319: Basic first aid care involving burns is to cool the skin down as quickly and safely as possible…
****
When my children were young I always kept a large, healthy aloe plant in my kitchen. One day, my oldest daughter’s best friend somehow managed to put the entire palm of her hand on her mother’s iron, which was on it’s hottest setting. The mother ran the child down the block to my house, I ran cool water over the hand and then I striped open an aloe leaf and bound it to her hand. Afterward the mother took the child to the ER where they opened the bandage, looked at the wound, rebound the leaf more professionally, and sent her home. The hand healed without leaving any scaring at all.
I used aloe for burns, small cuts, mosquito bites…there wasn’t anything I didn’t try aloe for. It usually worked. But it *always* worked for burns.
February 1st, 2009 at 2:11 am
Okay, for the last time, here’s why the coffee lady received such a favorable judgment: McDonald’s kept the coffee at 180 degrees. An average mouth will burn at 140 degrees. Yes, she was partially responsible for the incident. Putting a hot cup of coffee between your legs is not smart. It is, however, foreseeable. Absolutely everyone that has driven a car has at some point placed a beverage between their legs. It happens. We all know it happens. McDonald’s knows it happens yet they still chose to serve the coffee at clearly excessive temperatures.
As far as the amount of the original award, they’re called “punitive damages” for a reason. The purpose is to punish. McDonald’s didn’t even feel this. Plus, the jury’s decision to award 2.7 million wasn’t just plucked out of thin air. 2.7 million was the amount of profit McDonald’s made per day, say again, per day on coffee alone.
February 1st, 2009 at 2:42 am
Haha, there are so many ways to look at the McDonalds lawsuit.
I completely understand you Yodz and why the jury had awarded the woman damages. I mean, it is reasonable to expect a coffee spill on you without incurring 3rd degree burns, and McDonalds should not have kept the coffee at 180 degrees as you said.
But I guess the other point of view is this…
She spilt the coffee, which was not McDonald’s fault. It was her actions that caused the incident. However, it does return to negligence where McDonalds served 180 degree hot coffee.
Nevertheless, that the lawsuit wouldn’t be as stupid if it had been more about getting McDonalds to set a standard temperature on the coffee rather than her suing for damages against something she incurred DIRECTLY upon herself. McDonald’s part in this case is INDIRECT as the action that caused the incident was on the fault of the woman. But for her spilling the coffee, there would be no lawsuit.
So I guess the stupidity comes down to a woman causing her own demise, indirectly by a company, and obtaining massive amounts of money for her own stupidity. Regardless, I’d imagine she did need some of that money to cure her 3rd degree burns so I’m indifferent towards that, and as you said, it was nothing to a rich company like McDonalds
February 1st, 2009 at 3:46 pm
KILLER WHALE! I think mr. dukes (#2) should have won a darwin award
February 1st, 2009 at 6:30 pm
260: kofeelite
I believe he did win the darwin award:
http://www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin1999-18.html
257: segue
I’ve used the aloe treatment too! I once housesat for this woman who had plants everywhere, including a gigantic aloe plant in the living room. I burnt my finger on the edge of a hot frying pan and snipped off a bit of an aloe leaf. I have no idea if the plant was merely ornamentation for the woman who owned it so I also cut dried and yellowing leaves so it looked like I pruned it.
February 1st, 2009 at 10:53 pm
261. gabi319: I’ve used the aloe treatment too!…including a gigantic aloe plant in the living room. I burnt my finger on the edge of a hot frying pan and snipped off a bit…if the plant was merely ornamentation…
****
gabi, in my experience, no one keeps an aloe plant indoors as an ornamental plant. They aren’t all that pretty, but they do act as first-aid kits in a pot.
When you get ulcers aloe juice, sold at health food stores, and taken by the tablespoonful, will heal them quickly.
I just have an over-riding belief in the curative powers of aloe!
February 5th, 2009 at 10:51 am
258. Yodz
For the last time, please check above posts before reposting the same argument ad nauseum, especially those regarding the recommended serving temp for coffee.
********************
segue: What a great idea! I´m going to go buy one for my house! Now, the only question remaining is whether the poor thing will survive my black thumb….
February 18th, 2009 at 12:51 pm
263. GTT
Aloe plants are surprisingly easy to maintain as long as you don’t overwater them (root rot). That and Philodendron…I’ve tried to kill that plant through neglect but to no avail. Only my dad was that successful, haha.
Found some other frivolous lawsuits on this site:
http://madconomist.com/10-most-outragreous-frivolous-lawsuits
For those who are link-leery, here’s one of the funnier ones:
6. 2002, Edward Brewer sued Providence Hospital for $2 million. He claimed that the hospital was negligent because it had not prevented him from raping one of its patients. The judge ruled that any damage Brewer suffered due to his crime was his responsibility for choosing to commit the crime, and that the hospital had no legal duty to protect him from that choice.
*shoot…I knew that other one was an overlap of the original post and kept a mental note not to copy and paste that…so of course I did the opposite of what I wanted, haha. moderator, this is the new copy!
February 27th, 2009 at 6:42 pm
wow! america is sue happy, what ppl will do 4 money!
March 9th, 2009 at 12:57 am
what about that one lawsuit that an overly obese woman sued McDonalds for not telling her that their food would make her fat???
I’ve heard about it all over, but I’m not 100% sure it’s true.
Answer, anyone????
March 15th, 2009 at 7:24 pm
WE’RE DOOMED!!!!!!!!! with things like that happening in the world, humans are doomed!
April 1st, 2009 at 7:55 am
a killer whale,killing a human?unheard of
April 6th, 2009 at 7:25 pm
Technically a killer whale killing a human is unheard of, if it’s on purpose. I thought that guy died of hypothermia first and not the Tili. Those guards there must have been lazy or something huh?
That man suing himself, i wonder how long it took him to come up with that.
April 6th, 2009 at 7:52 pm
269. Tili
Mentioned in that Darwin Article I linked above. Excerpt below:
(6 July 1999, Florida) A naked man was found dead on the back of a killer whale at Sea World in Orlando on Tuesday morning, a victim of drowning or hypothermia in the 55-degree water. “There were no obvious signs of trauma. He wasn’t chewed or dismembered,”…
May 7th, 2009 at 11:17 am
A small correction, the kid in No.2 was never proved to be killed by the whale, general belief is that he died of a combination of hypothermia and drowning
May 7th, 2009 at 11:19 am
I mean no.9..i forgot the lists were backward..:S
June 17th, 2009 at 9:15 am
The frivolousness of the McD’s case is way overblown due to, as usual, horrible reporting.
McD’s intentionally and knowingly made it a policy to heat their coffee to unsafe levels to cover up the fact that they were using cheap beans.
They had hundreds if not thousands of employees severely burned by the coffee.
The woman initially only sought reimbursement for medical costs (which were pretty high) but McD’s offered some ridiculously small amount.
2.7 million was 2 days of coffee sales for McDonald’s.
The case is not frivolous at all.
I wish someone would sue the media for all the bad reporting they do. Especially, the ridiculous fear mongering.
June 24th, 2009 at 9:18 am
Did you hear the one about the three convicts who sued over soggy cookies and cake in their rations these three crooks wanted 2 million dollars for their pains THEY GOT NOTHING becuase the judge wisly dismissed the lawsuit THESE JERKS COMMIT THESE CRIMES GET TRIED CONVICTED AND SENTENCED BY A FAIR JUDGE AND JURY THEN DEMAND SPECIALT TREATMENT this is real case for the DEATH PENALTY
July 5th, 2009 at 4:52 am
a guy, about 16, once jumped a fence and entered a warehouse. he then went on and started walking on the warehouse’s roof. After a while, he fell of it and hurt is skull badly. After he woke up from his coma, he sued the owner of the warehouse for making a fence that was jumpable. Even worse, he won and was awarded more than 100,000 dollars. I just cant remember where I heard that…
August 2nd, 2009 at 12:32 am
The 80 year old McDonald’s woman initially asked McD’s for only $20,000 for the medical costs which included skin grafts due to 3rd degree burns to her inner thighs, and entire genitalia. She was also “debrided”. After legal fees she got like $150,000.
August 19th, 2009 at 8:36 am
Yeah, most people think the McDonalds one is unreasonable because they don’t know the facts. Coffee should never cause anyone a 3rd degree burn if it is spilled. She didn’t sue because the coffee was hot at all, she sued because it was unreasonably hot.
August 19th, 2009 at 9:14 am
@Andy (277):
*sigh*
August 20th, 2009 at 4:31 am
I’m a lawyer myself but not in america. You wouldn’t get one single lawyer in my country to even look at you with these ridiculous stories. Burn or no burn. The only legitimate claim I see here is the subway claim. The rest should have been fined for wasting the courts’ time. The taser one is beyond ridiculous! That officer is an idiot and should be treated as such. Killer whales kill? Really? I’d beat that guy’s family. How foolish. Grumble. Grumble. Grumble. I love the list though. Only in america. Lol.
August 24th, 2009 at 9:45 am
We are doomed but only because of lousy reporting.
I wonder how many corporate frivolous lawsuits are clogging up the court system. My guess is the number is much higher then these frivolous lawsuits by common people.
Enterprise Rent-A-Car
In 1998, Enterprise Rent-A-Car files lawsuits against Rent-A-Wreck of American (tiny rental company) and Hertz Corporation and threatened to file lawsuits against several other car-rental companies who use the phrase “pick you up”, claiming that “We’ll pick you up” is Enterprise’s slogan. While those suits were pending, Advantage Rent-A-Car counter-sued Enterprise, claiming that Advantage had used the phrase “we’ll pick you up” long before Enterprise did. Enterprise argued in its lawsuits that the phrase means more than “we’ll give you a ride;” it means “we’’ pick up your spirits. Competitors said that there was no other way to say “we’ll give you a ride.” Enterprise attorney Rudolph Telscher said that “we’ll decide in the courtroom who is correct here.”
August 26th, 2009 at 3:50 pm
KILLER whales can kill people. And there stuffed animals make them look friendly. The stuffed lions look friendly too, why don’t I go pet them next time I go to the zoo.
Some people are just stupid. No wonder the economy sucks so much.
August 27th, 2009 at 5:23 am
With number 1, the same thing happened to me (minus the law suit…)
I had burns on my thighs for like two weeks and it hurt to put on pants! Not to mention the car accidents I could have gotten into… it’s hard to drive when boiling-hot water is spilled into your lap!
I was driving and when my boyfriend handed me my coffee, the McDonald’s lid popped off and everything spilled in my lap
August 28th, 2009 at 6:22 pm
The man who wss convicted of murdering my father from inside the jail sued me for $5,000,000. I had to spend my own money defending myself against this frivilous lawsuit. you can to to my website http://www.plagueofjustice.com to see more, including the CBS 60 minute segment about this case
August 29th, 2009 at 1:19 pm
On the side of every 5gal plastic bucket(used for everything from plaster to dill pickles)it says: Warning: small children can fall into bucket and drown. The manufacturers of these buckets have to take the time and expense to post this warning because parents aren’t watching their damn kids. Where is the personal responsibility?
August 29th, 2009 at 2:07 pm
Stella first approached McDonalds to settle her claim for 20,000 to which they replied to take them to court.
During the discovery procedures in the case McDonalds was forced to produce documents showing more than 700 claims made by people burned by its coffee between 1082 and 1992. Some claims were as serious as Stella’s. McDonalds quality assurance manager testified that the company requires its stores to keep its coffee at 185 degrees, plus or minus five degrees. He also testified that a severe burn occurs with any food substance served at 140 degrees or above. Stella’s expert, (if you are on the other side of the ego fence he is probably an idiot) a scholar in thermodynamics as applied to human skin, testified that liquids at 180 degrees will cause full thickness butn to human skin in two to seven seconds.
The jury awards Stella 200,000 which was reduced to 160,000. The punitive award was reduced to 480,00. Later Stella settled the case with McDonald’s and was required to sign a confidential settlement agreement. So I guess we will never know what this money grub of an old lady got.
This story sure gave the corporate King a story it could deform and distort and BS people with such as those commenting on this site.
Yes, I would have to agree there are a lot of idiots and morons in this world as is evident by the people leaving comments on this site about things they know nothing about.
August 29th, 2009 at 2:19 pm
Remember the old days. I remember when their would be heads bouncing all over the pavement after a severe collision by unsafe windshield glass. The auto industry knew of the hazard but it was cheaper to defend suits brought by some small time lawyer and pay the occasional verdict than to correct the verdict.
But finally the cost of defending the cases exceeded the cost to the companies to change over to safety glass.
Of how about belly-buster seat belts. How did that get changed. How many productive lives to society have been saved by this.
Maybe because of law suits some of you morons commenting on this site are still alive today because of what some trial lawyers did.
I am not a trial lawyer but I do know that the truth is always somewhere in the middle. Of course Americans seem to have lost their desire for truth and only want facts that support their side of the ego fence.
September 15th, 2009 at 9:53 pm
When i scrolled down the list and came to #2 women versus act of god, i thought the story was going to be about a woman suing for the pornographic image. or am i the only one that sees a penis and testes here.
October 6th, 2009 at 4:46 pm
Lets see. Hot coffee+coffee pot+plus warming plate=coffee that is still hot. She had no other place to put the coffee while putting the extra things into the coffee?
October 17th, 2009 at 3:22 am
Bizarre Lawsuits – Two of the best ones concern the musicians Neil Young and John Fogerty in the 1980s – Young was sued by Geffen Records for making music that was different to his earlier material, whereas Fogerty was sued for making music that sounded like Creedence Clearwater Revival (for those unaware, Fogerty was CCR’s main singer/songwriter)…
November 2nd, 2009 at 10:53 am
Hilarious. I must admit though, boiling water on your lap? Although the amount of money is insanely ridiculous, that is pretty hot and if the coffee was insanely hot…. hell one could be persuaded the coffee is too hot. But water reaches vaporization at 100 degrees Celsius so does that mean that all coffee is generally served at a temperature near 100 degrees Celsius? It seems ridiculous but I guess she should have watched out, still that could have been insanely hot.
November 20th, 2009 at 8:59 am
“McDonalds coffee was not only hot, it was
scalding — capable of almost instantaneous destruction of skin, flesh and muscle. ”
It is reasonable to think that spilling coffee on yourself will burn you, and thus should be avoided. It is not reasonable to expect the coffee to be so hot to FUSE YOUR GENITALS TO YOUR LEGS. She suffered 3rd degree burns because McDonalds was being unsafe with their temperatures, and they had multiple warnings. Even drinking it would have been disastrous; so you are a fool if you think it was frivolous.
November 20th, 2009 at 9:40 am
The McDonald’s coffee lawsuit is a stunning example of propaganda and how the American public just looooves to fuse their lips to corporate genitals. Ignorant jackasses are still bringing this thing up a decade later as an example of a ‘frivolous’ lawsuit, I guess because Google is too hard to use. But why actually look into an issue and learn facts when you can just go LOL HOT COFFEE, ROLLEYES
December 1st, 2009 at 3:28 am
No. 7 is fucked up
December 1st, 2009 at 9:15 pm
Of course there were only twenty lawsuits in the entire country so that makes 50% of the lawsuits frivolous. I wonder what the final settlement was? Of course you do not hear about the over 700 people injured by McDonald’s hot coffee before this or the five year old boy that burned his eyes and face from the hot coffee. Lawsuits are always frivolous if you are not the one suing.
December 15th, 2009 at 9:11 am
I still find it hard to believe that there are apologists for the McDonald’s coffee case.
First of all, with the exception of superheating, coffee can not be any hotter than ~212°F. That is the boiling point of water, and coffee is 98.5 to 99% water. I wanted to mention that because some people here seem to think that McDonald’s was able to heat the coffee to some magically high, outrageous temperature.
At the time, McDonald’s corporate specifications called for coffee to be served at a temperature between 180 and 190°F. The coffee that was served to Stella was 180°F. This is quite a bit cooler than instant coffee made at home, which is generally made with *boiling* water (when the tea kettle whistles, the water is boiling [212°F]).
The National Coffee Association of U.S.A. instructs that coffee should be brewed “between 195-205 degrees Fahrenheit for optimal extraction” and consumed “immediately”. If not consumed immediately, the coffee is to be “maintained at 180-185 degrees Fahrenheit”.
McDonald’s did nothing wrong here. Logically, Stella was 100% to blame. She accidentally spilled the coffee on herself. The coffee was of a temperature at which a properly brewed cup of coffee should be. The coffee container did not fail. Stella placed the cup of coffee between her legs and removed the lid.
So where are McDonald’s points of blame? They served the coffee at the correct temperature for *good* coffee, and their container did not fail. Stella’s own voluntary actions caused the coffee to spill in her lap. So in the blame department:
Stella = 1
McDonald’s = 0
This case is the poster child for frivolous lawsuits, and for good reason.
January 11th, 2010 at 3:34 am
The factthat this list brings up the McDonald’s lawsuit which proves that the writer is a fucking idiot. That is a perfect example of why civil lawsuits are SUPPOSED to exist. when a large corporation willfully breaks their OWN RULES of safety in order to save a few pennies a day.
McDonalds ADMITTED their were at fault and financially liable in that case. Any time a fucking little bitch whines about “Coffee is supposed to be hot” they just prove how ignorant they are. Both of common sense, and of this case. Coffee is supposed to be hot. IT is NOT supposed to be almost boiling. IT is not supposed to be hot enough to cause massive third degree burns that require months of skin grafts. People spill coffee on themselves every day. Most don’t require surgery. If they do, the company that served the coffee at that
January 11th, 2010 at 3:39 am
Maximum recoil…you are a compete idiot. Yes..you can’t heat water beyond 212. But McDonalds came VERY close. And that is WAY above what coffee is suppose to be. (You show your ignroance with your comment regarding coffee temperature as if you think that that is close to what coffee should be. Here is a newsflash for you you fucking idiot…You know who is agreed with the lawsuit? MCDONALDS! Yup…you dumb fuck..McDonalds ALWAYS admitted that they were at fault. They went to court over the amount. But at NO time did they claim that they were not at fault. They admitted that the particular location broke THEIR OWN RULES and caused the injury. Guess what you worthless little nothing…you spill things on yourself all the time. And while more people wouldn’t care if you got hurt or even died, luckily for you, you don’t get hurt because there is no willful negligence on the part of a large corporation.
January 11th, 2010 at 9:06 am
@Lakawak
“Maximum recoil…you are a compete idiot. Yes..you can’t heat water beyond 212. But McDonalds came VERY close.”
“MaximUM”? Do you have a reading impairment? In any event, the coffee that was served to Liebeck was 180 degrees (32 degrees less than 212, not “VERY close”). Not only did I state that already, but it was stipulated in the court case as well. Also, that is the same temperature that various other large chains served their coffee at the time (including Starbucks, Dunkin’ Donuts, Wendy’s, and Burger King); and it is at the *lower* end of the recommended temperature that coffee is to be maintained at according to The National Coffee Association of U.S.A., and significantly lower than the recommended temperature for freshly brewed coffee (The National Coffee Association of U.S.A. instructs that coffee should be brewed “between 195-205 degrees Fahrenheit for optimal extraction” and consumed “immediately”).
Additionally, the court was duped with one of the plaintiff’s main arguments, which was later rejected as being scientifically false in a British court (and rightly so).
*Logically* McDonald’s was not to blame at all (it is clear that logic is well beyond your mental capabilities), regardless of what may or may not have been “admitted” to for legal reasons. I’ll repeat:
They served the coffee at the correct temperature for *good* coffee, and their container did not fail. Stella’s own voluntary actions caused the coffee to spill in her lap. So in the blame department:
Stella = 1
McDonald’s = 0
You refuted nothing I said. The only thing you’ve done here with your babble is put your reading difficulties and stupidity on public display.
BTW, don’t ever make tea or instant coffee at home with *boiling* water (when the tea kettle whistles, the water is boiling, i.e., 212 degrees), because you clearly can’t be trusted with such hazardous material; and you probably won’t be able to sue anyone when you inevitably spill it on yourself.
January 11th, 2010 at 9:59 am
My goodness. The McDonalds case seems to bring out the worst in some people. I’m afraid to chime in with my opinion, lest I be accused of being a ^$**# with a *(%%* who doesn’t know #$*&% about #%&#*
January 12th, 2010 at 4:10 pm
The problem with the McDonald,s lawsuit is not that it was frivolous but the problem is that people get excited and believe this to be the norm. (Like falling in love and you become delusional.) It is unfortunate that with that big brain on our heads we so easily jump to conclusions. (We must not be using all of those brain cells.)
While there are frivolous lawsuits and we can debate this one all day long I have yet had anybody prove to me empirically what percentage of total lawsuits are frivolous. If no one can supply that number then it is no different then any other type of brainless marketing that is thrown into the media.
January 30th, 2010 at 12:16 am
the number 3 man has got to be the dumbess man in the world…