Although it has nothing to do with the list, I consider this fact very interesting: Leonardo da Vinci invented the sniper firearm. It was not a rifle, as its barrel was smoothbore, but he greatly improved its accuracy by bolting one of his refracting telescopes onto it, aligning it precisely, and used it, in the company of his employer, the Duke of Milan, to shoot enemy soldiers off castle walls from 1,000 yards. He claims the equivalent of 1,000 yards in his notes, but I doubt the distance was this great. He provides no explanation as to why this weapon never became popular. So now, after that moment of randomness, here is the list:
President Washington never owned a set of wooden teeth. He did however own a set of hippopotamus ivory teeth, a set of horse teeth, donkey teeth, and human teeth (from various sources), a set of 18kt gold teeth (he tried 24kt but they were too malleable), and a set of lead teeth, which were not particularly good for him. These four sets of dentures (the human and animal teeth were mixed) are in the National Museum of Dentistry. No other dentures of Washington have been discovered.
Amazingly, many Christians believe that Satan is sitting on a throne in Hell, laughing at all the agony of the poor damned souls, while his imps and demons run around with pitchforks. None of this is Biblical. Satan is quite frequently described as living on Earth, and doing what he does best, corrupting mankind.
The tradition of a ruler in Hell comes from the Greek god Hades, at least, and perhaps even earlier with the Egyptians. Hades sits on the throne of the Underworld, just as Zeus, his brother, sits on the throne of Olympus.
The Biblical description of Hell is clearly anarchic. No one is in charge. Everyone is screaming and writhing, etc., in a lake of fire. Satan has never been there, and will not go until the end when he loses his fight against God.
The Christian tradition of Satan ruling Hell comes largely from John Milton’s “Paradise Lost.” “Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heav’n,” Satan says, in Book I.
There is a very common myth about psychology in which people believe they will alleviate their anger by “letting it out”. This is such a popular concept that many therapies have grown up around it – things like punchbags, squeeze balls, etc. In fact, the opposite is found to be true. When a person expresses their anger regularly, it becomes habit forming. While there may appear to be a temporary relief from the anger when you smash a plate against the wall, ultimately your fits of anger will become an addiction and you will begin to seek out more reasons to become angry – in order to achieve that nice feeling. So ultimate, the best thing to do: bottle it up!
Don Knotts, who played the lovable Barney Fife on the Andy Griffith Show, is said to have been a Marine Corps drill instructor during WWI, on Parris Island, SC, of the savage caliber of R. Lee Ermey. Not true. Knotts enlisted in the Army, not the marines, and served as a traveling comedian, entertaining troops overseas, during WWII, but never trained anyone, and never fired a rifle at anyone.
Caffeine will do a lot of negative things to you, but it will not stunt your growth. It has nothing to do with growth. Experiments have shown that children who consume caffeine do not grow any slower or less than children who are not allowed caffeine, over a period of years.
The myth was probably dreamed up by some clever parent who didn’t want his or her child drinking so much Pepsi.
Absinthe was never any more poisonous than whiskey. The myth goes back at least to the 1800s, and claims that it causes hallucinations, as potently as LSD, and fries the brain. Not true. Absinthe is manufactured from Artemisia absinthium, a plant which has no poisons in it. It is very bitter, like the Greek Ouzo, and the distillation process routinely results in absinthe proofs of 100 to 180 (50% to 90% alcohol by volume). This is significantly stronger than the average whiskey, but will not affect the drinker in any way other than drunkenness.
The truth, though, is that during the Moulin Rouge days of Toulouse-Lautrec and van Gogh, starving artists liked getting drunk, and couldn’t afford the good stuff. So they bought absinthe from cheap street vendors, who did not care to sell uncontaminated products. Cyanide and strychnine were found in this absinthe, and caused hallucinations.
Today, it is legal in the U. S., and perfectly safe to drink if bought commercially.
Opening windows will not spare your house, or any other building, from a tornado’s destructive power. The strongest on record measured 318 mph, which is more than sufficient to blast any building into pieces, except steel-reinforced concrete, and even then, the building must be short, or the wind will blow it over.
Do not hide under overpasses. The confined eaves in these places only increase the force of the wind, which has been reported as strong enough to drag F-250 pickup trucks out from under overpasses and throw them through barns 1000 yards away.
Tornadoes can, in fact, form in winter, and cause just as severe damage as during any other season. They have been seen traveling over snowfield, almost utterly white, and slamming into residential areas.
They can storm through large cities without any problem, as opposed to the belief that they will never damage Oklahoma City. Fort Worth suffered one in 2000, which killed 2 people, and destroyed 8 skyscrapers. 17 others were severely damaged. 60+, in all, had their windows blown out.
The myth has gone on for years now that Shakespeare invented about 1,700 words still common in English. Not true. He Anglicized many Latin and Greek words, among other languages, thus coining new English words. But to be invented, a word must have no etymology before a single person imagines it.
He is said to have invented “assassination,” but what he did was derive it from the Medieval Latin “assassinare,” which means “to kill an important person.”
All of the words he is reputed to have invented can be explained this way. He did, however, devise first name uses for quite a few words, including Viola, Jessica, and Adrian. The first is Latin, the second Hebrew, the third Greek.
Sidenote: Sir Isaac Newton Anglicized “gravitas,” which is Latin for “weight,” into “gravity.” As he was the first to discover the mechanism and its properties, how they work, he had to come up with a word for it. No one else had ever called gravity anything.
Debaters on both sides are grossly misinformed. Darwin never states in his book On the Origin of Species that humans evolved from apes. He states, quite differently, that apes and humans both evolved from a common ancestor. This seems somewhat less offensive to fundamentalists, and if both sides were to consider it, it might smooth the relationship between fundamentalists and science.
This story of how the kangaroo got its name is unfortunately not true. It states that Captain James Cook first landed on Australia, near modern day Sydney, and met the Gweagal tribe of Aborigines on the beach. At this moment, a kangaroo hopped out of the forest with its joey in its pouch and the Europeans, having never seen such a strange animal, asked the Aborigines, “What in the world is that?!”
The Aborigines turned to each other, then shrugged, and one of them said, “Kangaroo!” which is Gweagal for, “I don’t understand what you’re saying!”
Well, the truth is much more banal. “Kangaroo” is derived from the Guugu Yimidhirr (another Aborigine tribe) word “gangurru,” which means…”kangaroo.”






























Flamehorse is proving to be a nightmare for list submitters
I’d say the best way to deal with anger isn’t to vent it nor to bottle it up, but to deal with the problem that’s making you angry. Good list, lots of interesting facts. And I for one am now going to spend the rest of the night laughing at the mental image of Leonardo da Vinci in a sniper’s perch.
Who cares whether you call a kangaroo kangaroo or jfrater or flamehorse Laughoutloud.
Who cares whatever darwin says. Its just a theory,blah
i love the tornado myths!
another myth: tornadoes only happen in tornado alley. actually they can and do happen in all fifty u.s. states (even alaska) and many countries all over the world!
“This seems somewhat less offensive to fundamentalists, and if both sides were to consider it, it might smooth the relationship between fundamentalists and science.”
…wha? Scientists have been saying this for years! “Consider it”? That’s OUR line! Good grief.
I rock
Anyone with a decent scientific literacy will know about Myth 2.
It’s actually the theist side that believes (likely due to a lack of scientific literacy) that man evoleved from apes/monkeys, and thus use the argument “well if man evolved from apes/monkeys why are there still apes/monkeys?” to refute the theory of human evolution.
Number 9 is very interesting though.
I read in the dorling kindersly ency. that better be safe in your car rather than risking your head under a tree in a lightning storm. Dunno much about tornadoes though.
Talk about anger, counting from one upto 10 which was taught to me never helped, until listverse came by! Now climbing down the list from 10 to one easily milks my anger
The Absinthe entry is incorrect. While not a hallucinogen Absinthe, traditionally does contain thujone which is a substance that the body reacts to in a similar fashion that THC would cause. THIS IS ILLEGAL in the united states. You are becoming confused by variant products created without the substance but through similar means called “Absinthe” in an attempt to cash in on the current popularity of the drink, imaging cigarettes rolled up and being sold under the assumption is was pot, same concept. One should not be confused by the two products who are very separate and during the time of the artists listed may have had a much much higher Thujone amount than todays brands. Van Gogh hallucinated becuase he would put his paint brush in his mouth while he worked to hold it, and oil paints in this day had lead in them.
The whole myths debunked lists are pretty poorly set up, usually containing myths no one has ever heard of, are clearly false, or are only wrong on a technicality (like the Shakespeare entry, and the absinthe as stated above), I know thats harsh but I like this site and don’t want a slippery slope of poor lists.
No wonder the father of the nation doesn’t smile in any of his portraits.
I never knew George owned a hippopotamus, a horse and an ass as pets. lol. And they too needed a set of dentures like their owner. Double lol.
“Do not hide under overpasses.”
Tell me that the people in the following video would have been better off standing out in the open during this tornado:
I don’t think so.
@El the erf (4): who cares what you say. you obviously have not yet grasped the complexities of evolution, nor do you even have the slightest inkling to do so.
that’s okay. neither did i before i was in my mid-20′s.
it’s quite interesting and once fully understood. it’s complexities are visible in everything. metaphors aside, all things, concepts, ideas, and languages evolve.
’nuff said. go curl up with your Bible and read some half-assed accounts of ancient lineages written 200 years after the family clans had been assimilated by other groups.
Pity,Cook had such a good chance naming an animal after him. But then,had that been the case…today we might have been calling the aussies cooks rather than kangaroos! I guess that would be sound weird.
In a cricket match if the aussies beat NZ, the headlines would read : ‘ Cooks cook kiwi soup ‘.
I do love when myths get debunked. Cool list, FlameHorse.
I knew about the tornado ones as I lived for a brief time in tornado alley. I had 2 very close encounters with some tornados…one at an overpass. It made us float a bit, but thankfully didn’t pick anyone up.
@El the erf (16): You do realize that you called Australians, kangaroos…right? That’s not nice.
While the list is interesting, and quite benign for flamehorse, I have to ask… what’s up with the sniper bulls***t in the opening?
Sorry Flamehorse… you seem bright and all, but there’s something creepy going on with ya (and I also would comment that sniper-talk at this particular moment in time is in poor taste, considering the mass shootings that have been happening here in the US the last couple days…)
Can we revert to less controversy and more trivial matters please? Is it worth the time to submit a list of my own, or are there bushels of them?
@DM (14):
uhm, the audio on that very clip agrees with the list. not to even mention all the debris whipping through that underpass like bullets. i believe you’re actually supposed to lie down flat with your arms protecting your head and neck in the ditch at the side of the road or other low point and wait if caught outside……
I believe nearly everyone KNOWS that satan is not the ruler of hell..he is predestined to burn in hell and has an appointed time on earth till the end of days to mislead the human race and the disbelievers will follow him to eternal doom.
And whoever is a good christian,muslim or jew and believes in #2 is a blasphemer.
What is the thumbnail photo on the first page and at the top of this page meant to represent?
@oouchan (18): I believe you’ve not witnessed a cricket match yet,ain’t it? Australian players feel quite proud when referred to as kangaroos. Same with the New Zealanders( the kiwis). Its not offensive at all. It just goes with the game.
They call the bangladeshi’s ‘tigers’ in the game of cricket. But that doesn’t make them tigers, does it?
Anyway, its the kangaroos who win always. Cheerio!
Of course satan walks on Earth, we have drinks every so often; but he goes by “Kristen Bell” now…
Read the name and instantly knew it was Flamehorse. Atleast its a good one. The Satan and Darwin entries will probably rack up a few hundred comments. I thought someone who bottles up their anger is just passive aggressive, isn’t that worst. Anyway, good list. Nice job Flamehorse.
@lo (20)
You may have noticed that while the people in the video were shaken (who wouldn’t be), everyone was fine. Given the choice between laying exposed in a ditch and tucked up in an underpass, I’d take the underpass hands down like the survivors in the video did.
@T.J. (11): commented before I read all the comments. this tj guy sounds like he knows his absinthe. and as far as I know its only legal in europe so far. also you make a good point at the end about list quality, which is quite evident in the last couple lists…sooo, when are we gonna see a T.J. list?
number 9′s image is from Doctor Who, isn’t it?
anyway, very nice list, I love thses “myths debunked” lists
#2 is just plain ridiculous. No credible scientist would ever believe that darwin stated this and to even suggest it makes a mockery of the entire list.
#1 reminds me of a similar story regarding the name of the Indian city Calcutta now renamed ‘Kolkata’.It goes like this:
When the British landed up in India,some of the englishmen while exploring around came upon a city.To enquire about the name of that city,they asked a local grasscutter in English “What is the name of this place?”
The grasscutter thought they were asking “When did you cut the grass”? and therefore replied in Bengali(his mother tongue) “Kol kata” meaning “I cut it yesterday”…
And thus it came to be known as Calcutta-the anglicized version.
Sorry,badly written but that’s it.
@El the erf (4):
You have misunderstood the scientific meaning of the word ‘theory’.
Caffein is banned by the IOC. Also by NCAA. Poor athletes, how do they survive without their morning cuppa of java.
@archiealt (33): It would have helped if you would have atleast tried ‘xplainin’ things.
Two small contibutions to etymological matters:
1) “Assassin”, “assassination” and other words in this semantic field are believed to derive either from the arab hassassin or persian hashashin. Either way, it refers to a sect that existed during the Middle ages and resorted to political murdering to attain its goals. The word is commonly believed to refer to the followers of Hassan, the group leader Hassan-i-Sabbah. There other hypothesis, though, that even link the term with hashish consumption.
2)It’s interesting to note that the words gravitas, gravium and its other declinations were quite present in the work of Newton’s predecessors. In fact, it was one of the major problems that were worked on in the field of physics – the movement of heavy bodies, or the Moto Gravium, as in the title of one of Torricelli’s works. It does not rob Newton, though, of the glory of havig isolated and named something no one had never divised before.
Ahem… “contributions”, not “contibutions”
@The boy from troy (32): I have heard about it. Btw its name has reverted back to kolkata from calcutta, hasn’t it?
@El the erf (35):
Speaking shortly, El, there are different epistemological concepts, or tools, that play different roles in the making of science.
What is commonly called theory is actually closer to a hypothesis – a general idea that may sustain a body of knowledge that shall be built upon it. One may say that the objects fall because the Earth attracts them, or that it so happens because their natural position is near the center of the Earth. These are both hypothesys.
A theory correlates the data acquired through observation oriented by the hypothesis, actually building the aformentioned body of knowledge. A theory tries to describe and explain the processes concerned in the field of observation. A scientific theory tries to answer the question, “how?”.
Laws constitute the generalizations that can be achieved through the observations and the theoretical descriptions. A law doesn’t describe, it simply states, in lack of better words now, a scientific truth. So, Newton’s Law of Gravitation states that any two objects exert a gravitational force of attraction on each other, and that the magnitude of the force is proportional to the product of the gravitational masses of the objects, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. This allows us, for example, to make predictions, but provides no explanation to how this process actually happens.
I hope this helped.
Today’s not my day…. “aforementioned”, not “aformentioned”.
Sorry, FlameHorse. I generally enjoy reading your lists but this one was pretty random and very oddly written.
I’d write a much better written comment but I sort of am kind of late-ish for work-ish (but only by an hour and 10 minutes. However, I still have to get ready for work). Among the things that really stood out for me:
Leonardo da Vinci’s “employer” should really be called “patron”. As far as his supposed rifle… LdV is a prolific thinker but not much of a prolific DOer. It’s far more accurate to consider him an excellent designer rather than inventor because he rarely fully transformed any of his drawings into functional pieces. Hell, he rarely even finished his artworks, commissioned or otherwise. THAT is why it is highly unlikely he would have constructed a rifle that accurate. But you are right. That opening paragraph is very random.
#8 & #2 stuck out the most. Neither are really backed up with a lot of insight so it makes it sound more subjective than anything. General consensus in #8 is that HOW you express your anger is the way to determine if it is a good way to vent or not. Even proponents of this anti-vent movement, such as Alex Spiegel, don’t believe in repressing it but rather to do anything but yell about it. The Evolution item makes it sound like Evolutionists also once thought that humans descended from apes, which they wouldn’t believe if they know the topic well. And knowing it doesn’t smooth any feathers. Quite a number of anti-Evolutionists will still be put off by the idea of being related to animals in any fashion. The way you wrote it makes it seem as if both parties were at fault for this myth. Just browsing through http://listverse.com/2008/09/14/your-view-should-creationism-be-taught-in-schools/ and you’ll be hard=pressed to find any evolutionist who claims that on that 3000+ thread. The very weird wording and lack of…lengthy paragraph(s)… makes me wonder if it was just thrown in the list purely for its controversial comment potential.
@El the erf (38): Yeah,it’s now Kolkata only but earlier before Calcutta,was it named Kolkata..I dunno.Indians hate these anglicized names coz it reminds them of their enslavement to the british.And for that you’ll have to confirm from an Indian citizen.
Hemingway wrote of absinthe in his (I feel) oddest book “The Garden of Eden.” Its been many years since I read it but I never forgot it.
The satan in hell thing. There is another great book out there called “Good Omens” By Neil Gaiman (sp?) I highly recommend this book. It puts an interesting spin on things.
Lake Michigan protects the city proper from tornadoes. There are tornadoes in Illinois (I drove through one in Naperville in the late summer of 2007)but not in Chicago.
Never heard the caffeine one before, I know for a fact it’s not true though. I’ve been a caffeine addict (mmm coffee) for most of my life and I’m 6’5 (about 195cm)
@Kanza (39):
WoW,that was complex! but i got the idea.
While I was reading your post, I was getting an image of a Harvard professor talking to me
Oh my I didn’t pay attention to the Shakespeare inventin’ assassinate or anythin like that in the list and of course Kanza is right in his statement.
@El the erf (35):
Define: Theory (Princeton.edu) – a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world; an organized system of accepted knowledge that applies in a variety of circumstances to explain a specific set of phenomena. “Theories can incorporate facts and laws and tested hypotheses”; “true in fact and theory”.
By using this definition, we observe Disease, make measurements using tools and instruments, and theorize that disease is caused by germs (AKA Germ Theory of Disease).
You (and many others) seem to be confusing ‘theories’ with ‘hypotheses’. A hypothesis may, perhaps explain one or more observation in a meaningful manner, it must be testable, and it must make predictions about future tests. The hypothesis is promoted to a theory when it has withstood all legitimate attempts to falsify it. A ‘theory’ has never been shown to be false, despite thousands or perhaps hundreds of thousands of attempts to debunk.
And while some of its mechanisms may be hypotheses, the fact remains, the Theory of Evolution has withstood all legitimate tests.
While we’re on the topic: also note that in science, a ‘law’ it not an elevated hypothesis or theory – quite the opposite. A scientific law (e.g. Law of Gravity or Kepler’s Three Laws of Planetary Motion) is a descriptive generalization of observed events – how something behaves, and not why it behaves in that manner.
@El the Erf (45):
Maybe it was a little over the top, then!
Fantastic list, as per usual, FlameHorse! Interesting facts and a great mix of topics. I would, however, suggest that instead of “bottling up” your anger, you find a healthier way to deal with it.
@stevenh (47):
I think hypothesis and theories have distinct places and functions in the making of science. A theory, for instance, must have an explanatory power that is not required of a hypothesis. It tries to provide a model that exposes how such hypothesis is feasible. The theory is then tested, and if corroborated by experimental data, will attain a place in its field. And theories may be found false, there’s nothing that prevents it. Lots of theories have been found false throughout the centuries; they become obsolete, but remain theories just the same. It happens precisely because a theory is not a promoted hypothesis, but a methodical explanatory attempt.
I thought George Washington had wooden teeth. LOL, guess not, thanks for enlightening me!
@El the erf (35):
What ‘Kanza’ said was spot on. However I implore you not to believe him or I. Don’t use the internet as a place of learning. Never believe anything you read on the internet without second checking it for yourself first. Including this list, i’m not saying it’s wrong, but we just don’t know. We have absolutely no idea who ‘Flamehorse’ is or where he gets his information from. Every word of what is written could be a lie.
The internet is a playground. We should come here to waste time, to procrastinate and have a break from our boring lives. Not to gather information.
@stevenh (47):
Kanza cleared up the clouds in my heads pretty well.
but that was awesome too! thanks!
@rushfan (49):
I have already suggested that in comment 10! better to read items from 10 to 1 in listverse rather than counting from 1 to 10 in order to contain your anger!
@archiealt (52):
Thanks for that piece of advice, sir. I’ll keep it in mind.
@El the erf (54):
Don’t listen to advices on internet:)
Damn, El, half the comments on this list are yours.
By the way, great list. You never disappoint, flamehorse.
Cool list FH
Yeah, I believe the only side that argues that Darwin claimed we came from apes is the Creationist side. This is a clear example of Balance as Bias.
Humans didn’t just evolve from apes – we are apes.
Try explaining that to a fundamentalist.
If someone is claiming we’re not, that just means they do no know what “ape” means.
nice list! cheers from the philippines!