In this list we see a combination of two of my favorite things – ancient (well mostly) history and warriors. While most of these warrior groups come from ancient history – one or two come close to modern history. They all, undoubtedly, belong on this list. Please mention other groups who might be considered for a future list in the comments.
The Aztecs were famous soldiers and ruthless in battle. They were usually dressed like animals like the eagle or the jaguar. They used pretty primitive weapons like clubs and bows but used them with great effectiveness. The “Shorn Ones” (Cuachicqueh) were the greatest warriors and as soon as the enemy came they swore they would not take another step back. They were eventually defeated by the Spaniards with much more modern weapons but they were a great empire in large part due to their great warriors.
The Mongols were considered barbarians and savages. They dominated Europe and Asia and were most famous for riding on horseback lead by one of the greatest military commanders in history, Genghis Kahn. They were highly disciplined and masters with using the bow and arrow on horse back. They used a composite bow that could rip through armor and were also pretty good with lances and scimitars. They were masters of psychological warfare and intimidation, and built one of the largest empires the world has ever seen.
A mamluk was a slave soldier who converted to Islam and served the Muslim caliphs and the Ayyubid sultans during the Middle Ages. Over time, they became a powerful military caste often defeating the Crusaders. On more than one occasion, they seized power for themselves; for example, ruling Egypt in the Mamluk Sultanate from 1250–1517. After mamluks had converted to Islam, many were trained as cavalry soldiers. Mamluks had to follow the dictates of furusiyya, a code that included values such as courage and generosity, and also cavalry tactics, horsemanship, archery and treatment of wounds, etc.
The backbone of the Roman army that led to an empire that was unrivaled in terms of size and power. They were usually heavy infantry with armor and a shield modeled after the ancient Greeks. They were masters of the sword and spear combination going along with a shield. They were made up of the wealthiest soldiers that could afford to make the best weapons and armor. They were disciplined, well-armed, and had great strategy which lasted beyond their empire.
The apaches were like the ninjas of America. They would sneak up behind you and slit your throat without you even knowing. They used primitive weapons made mostly of wood and bone. They were also the greatest knife fighters the world has ever seen and were pretty good with the tomahawk and throwing ax. They terrorized the southwest United States and even the military had trouble beating them. They were great hit and run fighters and their descendants teach modern day special fighters how to fight in hand to hand combat.
The samurai were the knights of Japan and the masters of the katana. They were heavily armed soldiers covered in armor and willing to die for their masters. They wielded the sharpest sword the world has ever seen and it could easily slice a man in two. They were also masters of the yumi (bow) and were some of the best shots of the ancient world. They were like professional soldiers and were harshly trained and fought knowing their honor was on the line. Due to their violent habits, peasants soon rose up against them and the ninja was born.
The ninja were the masters of stealth and sabotage. They were originally peasants trained to defeat marauding samurai, but the eventually became the legendary assassins that most people think of today. They are known for using a Kanata like sword, blowgun, ninja stars, and kusarigama which would be my weapon of choice. They are known for being stealthy shadow warriors of the night. They greatly feared for their ability to kill and just disappear. They were also great martial artists and underwent rigorous training.
Vikings – the terror of Europe. The most feared warrior of the ancient world. They terrorized Europe with their raids and pillaging. They were ferocious in battle and used weapons that suited their stature. They were big and mean and used their axes, swords, and spears expertly in the conquering of cities. Even their religion was about war and they believed when you died in battle you fought once again in a never ending battle. They were all you would want in a soldier and proved it on the battlefield by destroying all in their paths. On the flip-side, they were also incredibly good traders so they also brought much good to Europe.
You thought they would be number one didn’t you? The Spartan culture was all about war and training men for war their entire lives. They had a saying: “come back with the shield or on top of it” which means don’t come back unless you are victorious. They were some of the toughest soldiers the world had ever seen and have become infamous for their last stand at the battle of Thermopylae. They were masters of the shield and spear combination that was later copied by many other armies.
Knights were great warriors clad in full body armor on horseback. The warrior of feudal Europe, the protector of kings. They were the richest, most trained warriors, and had the armor, weapons, and horses to get the job done. They were among the toughest soldiers in history to kill because of their armor. They were highly effective soldiers that had trained almost their entire lives (due to boys of the day wanting to grow up to be one) and became the tank of the ancient world. The reason they are listed as item 1 – instead of Spartans (which most people would have expected) is that knights were also expected to behave in a moral manner and from the fact that most did, we have the term chivalrous which comes from old French chevalier meaning “knight”. The knight was the perfect example of a warrior and a gentleman.






























did the 13th century scots have a name, or were they just the 13th century scots…..
they were badass…most people would recognize them from 'braveheart', which i have never seen, because mel gibson is such a *****ing twerp
i did, however, learn *something* in school, somewhere along the way
i wouldnt ***** with them
yeah they were offsprings of scandinavian vikings
WRONG
No they wern't lmfao, They were celtic. They were savages and in braveheart it completely doesn't make them out like they actually were, The romans didn't even enter Scotland because they were like '***** that' They used to run into battle fully naked with primitive weapons. They were also Pagans.
Crazy doesn’t make great warriors, bud.
Tell that to a berserker.
Amazon women? On the moon?
I was under the impression that Amazon women were mostly mythological and such. There’s a lack of archeogical evidence to support the theory, although certain graves and tombs where women were burried with weapons and armour, and one’s leg bones were bowed, which means she would have spent a lot of time on horseback. That’s the best evidence, and people still aren’t sure if those were the Amazon race or just female warriors from once upon a time where women might have been considered in that kind of esteem.
The amazons were real but there’s no clear evidence of how their society was structured and everything! So I guess they don’t really qualify for real warriors.
MAn that viking in the picture is so badass! but more historical deatil on the subject matter wouldve been appreciated . The movie 300 was cool but in reality the spartans ( and many other similaire civilisations in that area ) buggerd little boys , so maybe move them to no.10 ?
Spartans were NOT “buggering” young boys. Those were the Athenians mainly! Do not confuse the whole ancient Greek cities with the customs of SOME city-states.
The Spartans were trained warriors since childhood. The boys were given little food during training so they’d learn to make it work, and if they got caught stealing the punishment wasn’t for theft; it was for getting caught. They were a force. And the city-states of Greece were each different someway or another.
Actually Athenians were more about buggering little boys under the olive trees; Spartans had a cult of (grown) male lovin'. Their army was the army of couples/lovers because it was believed–and all those victories kept proving them right–that if you fill the army with lovers, each troop will fight thrice as hard in order to be a hero (or not to be a coward) in his lover's eyes.
This has nothing to do with their prowess in battle. Regardless of who they spent their *****ual life with, they could lob your head off and probably any of the others in this list in one on one combat.
wrong adult homo*****uality was not excepted anywhere in Greece let alone Sparta. second only 19th to present historians make false claims about Sparta. all classical historians with the exception of Plutarch( who wasn’t a classical wrighter) state pediphilia was not excepted. only whacked out politically correct dumb ass make such claims. further more no where was it exceptable for grown men to have a relationship period. only the sacred band of thebes was known to do this and that was a 400 man strong special unit. Philip the great hated Sparta because the Spartans openly criticized Thebes and Philip admired them. I’d suggest doing your own research before believing Hollywood and progressives.
Thrace in fact had an openly homo*****ual population in their military if I remember correctly. Not Spartans or Athenians though.
@Swede [25]:
Believe it or not, there was a previous list that clarified those myths. At least the one about the viking helmets that is. Don't have the direct link though.
@Julius [27]:
This would have worked if the Samurais fought against themselves.
The problem is they not only had to fight against Kublai Khan's army but also the arquebus used by Nobunaga's army but they had to deal with ninjas and the samurai armor was also mainly used in full scale battle.
Technically the knights were the same but as you said their swords were mainly to stab so in an un-armored battle, fencing techniques would have had made up for the lack of armor.
Overall in terms of the different variables the armor was supposed to defend against during it's time, the Samurai's armor design was among the most inferior armor built for it's time but it also seemed un-upgradeable in that compared to Spartan, Legion or Knight armors the design had sort of reached it's peak and although the overall armor was well designed, again it just came a time where it seemed inferior and wouldn't create a titan-like formation compared to the earlier armors or the armor of Knights which were still much more reliant on quality than design.
@gav [60]:
Well I'm new to this site so I wasn't aware of a top Hannah Montana list but I don't think it's about nitpicking stuff. Even if it were, it would add and not detract to the quality of a list as more accurate information = better knowledge/trivia gained.
Like I previously alluded to, some of the definition was just off. Some of the pics were off.
The rankings were…weird.
Even the choices seem based on popularity rather than including 1 or 2 choices that are barely known thus proving the author's attempt at creating a somewhat accurate list.
I found the list you mention, another poster put up a link to it. Anyway, I’m sorry now that I was so critical, since the picture apparently wasn’t chosen by the list’s author. Especially since I’ve seen the sheer amount of negative commentary this list has engendered. I suppose the author is a young man or boy, rather than a historical researcher, and as such, he’s probably made as good a list as can be expected. I hope he won’t give up writing altogether because of massive negativity; with diligent work he may surely improve in the areas of research and presentation.
Dont forget the janissary corps.
go vikings!!!!!!
So many historical accuracies make my historian-ego churn.
*inaccuracies, whoops
Samurai is my fav lol
Did you see ’300′, ‘The Last Samurai’ and ‘A Knights Tale’ and decide to do a list? Awful!
Impressive list as I would never be able to compare the various warriors from around the world. Omissions I noticed straight away were the Zulu Impis of the 19th century, the Maori warriors, the afghan badmashes, 1970′s Leeds United supporters and probably other groups I wouldn’t like to meet on a dark night.
The information on the Roman legionaries is only true up to the Marius reforms in the later Roman Republic. After these reforms there was no welath criteria for the common soldier and they became a professional army. The wealthiest citizens became the commanders of the legions. Even non-citizens could join as auxilliaries with the reward of citizenship after their service.
Ninja’s have a pretty awesome reputation but I think thats all hollywood rather than reality. I might be wrong but i think ninjitsu was all about the art of running away and hiding. Their martial skills were more about hampering persuers rather than taking them on and killing them. Good list though.
You might want to research a bit on ninjutsu. While it is true that their skills with regard to escape were great, given their purpose, infiltration skills were more important. As for martial skills, it's best if you find that out for yourself. All i can say is efficiency was key in their line of work.
bad list
You should have wrote it Edskibobble. Sounds like you know a thing or two about actually something.
Kick ass list. I don’t like how all the warriors were accurately depicted except the vikings. Listverse does it all the time. The creators of the list somehow include their lil’ biased opinions. Then again, you’re not real authors/journalists.
Unfortuantely, I have to agree with the previous commenters. Too much fan-boy squee. Not enough research. While I commend that you have looked to several usually underrated warriors, there is not enough information here to take it from ‘stuff I leant at the movies’ and take it to ‘stuff I would actually pass if I handed this in as an assignment’.
” They would sneak up behind you and slit your throat without you even knowing”. So i should think that they would slit my throat and then i could go on with my day woth absolutely no problems.
“They were big and mean “. So vikings were some kind of hulks? Were they also green? And i dont mean to be annoying but whats with the pic for the vikings entry, jfrater. Did you take it from a comic book?
Also, doesnt ancient refer to antiquity? If so why did you consider vikings to be part of the ancient world? It just doesnt make any sense.
Since this list was annoying for me id give it a thumbs down. The previous historical warriors was way better than this one.
Dear dear me….this is pretty basic and fairly generic….not good
what about the Assyrians?
When i read the list’s title i was like ‘great idea for a list’ but after reading it was more of ‘wtf?’
so i have to totally agree with cammykinnis and ziraphen! I mean that this mean that this list greatly lacks research work.
you could have included much more information(verified) to make the list entertaining.
1.time frame for the groups.
2.the spread of their territory(something like the terrors of europe don’t give an accurate idea where they situated themselves)
3.did they have any leaders? Think about vikings,spartians and romans..don’t you feel something is lacking.
4.what brought them to their downfall?
5.did they have any rivals,enemies?
6.and do warriors war? So why is there no depection of any of their conflicts(or massacre in some cases)
7.do they have any legacy?
there are too many questions that can be asked after reading this list..really not enough information! And if i am not wrong the vikings’ god was odin.
They may not belong on this list, but the Zulus under Shaka probably deserve a mention.
“By the time of Shaka’s assassination in 1828, it had made the Zulu kingdom the greatest power in southern Africa and a force to be reckoned with, even against Britain’s modern army in 1879.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaka#Shaka.27s_social_and_military_revolution
What about shaolin warriors? You guys must be laughing right now because you think this guy is bull*****ting. But go do a research yourself about shaolin warriors. They have served ancient china many times when china is in trouble. Japanese pirates, criminals, rebellions…
@Crazedfishuk [16]:
Agreed. I know very little about the subject but it has to be said that it’s too generic and too confusing.
For example something like:
The apaches were like the ninjas of America. They would sneak up behind you and slit your throat without you even knowing. They used primitive weapons made mostly of wood and bone. They were also the greatest knife fighters the world has ever seen and were pretty good with the tomahawk and throwing ax.
Needs more than one sentence to justify. It just screams “Did he just think ninjas = hit and run scouts instead of assassins?!”
Even the top requirement makes no sense:
The reason they are listed as item 1 – instead of Spartans (which most people would have expected) is that knights were also expected to behave in a moral manner and from the fact that most did, we have the term chivalrous which comes from old French chevalier meaning “knight”. The knight was the perfect example of a warrior and a gentleman.
So how does that explain a Ninja then?
…or of the Samurai who’s Hagakure/Bushido exceeds the Knight’s Chivalry?
P4P Samurais were often defeated by more strategic warriors precisely because they combined the sturdiness of the Spartans, the berserkish charge of the Vikings and the honor and combat style of Knights.
At the same time, they had inferior armor, expensive swords and came in a time where they have to deal with things Viking didn’t have to (gunpowder) so the criteria is just all over the place.
I am dead sure this list will get many many more comments.
by the way it would be nice if the administrators come up with a site update or list about the figures and statics of the year 2009(or till now) about the site. It would be great what list were the most commented,most viewed or simply the most controvesial for the last couple of months! Just a suggestion. Have a nice day everyone!
the vikings did not believe they went to an eternal battle when they died they believed they went to valhalla were they could kill each other everyday and wake up just fine the next morning.
No they believed that they went to Valhalla to feast with the gods until the final battle.
Terrible list, rife with historical inaccuracy and generally very badly written.
@bluesman87 [15]: I don’t know about the aztecs and the medieval knights, but besides from them everybody on this list “buggered” little boys
Yes, there are some errors in the picture of the Viking:
o Vikings did not know about stirrups, which is why they only fought on foot. They would ride to battle and then dismount for the actual fighting.
o They did NOT have horned helmets (how often will this have to be said before the artists finally get it?)
o In the Viking era, no self-respecting woman in Europe or Asia would dress like the woman in the picture. (A furry swimsuit? Give me a break! People didn’t wear swimsuits in those days, Skin-dipping was the norm on the beach until the 19th century, when continental influence finally managed to convince the Scandinavians that it was somehow indecent to bathe in the nude.)
o The axe looks too heavy even for an unusually big man as the one depicted. Viking battle-axes were no heavier than they had to be to inflict damage, rarely over 2 kg.
o Viking horses were small, think “pony”.
Would’ve been a good/interesting list, were it written in an un-opinionated and semi-scholarly manner. I.e. not written by a simpleton.
@Sluiq [22]: The samurai didn’t have inferior armor. The samurai armor was designed to withstand the slicing attacks of a katana and they did that very well, whereas the european armor was designed to withstand the stabbing motion of sword/spear. Neither did they really fight like knights anyway. Their mainweapon, the katana was a slicing weapon, designed for quick sweeping attacks whereas the european sword was meant for stabbing.
@milqytoast [27]: I think JFrater took that picture from a comic, but I agree there is a LOT wrong with it…
@Edskibobble [9]:
1970 Leeds utd supporters. Excellent comment
@Harry [5]:
Ditto, when I read it, it sounds like my HS education on history. Thankfully, I studied history in uni, and learned how basic and …well inaccurate a lot of this list is.
@basil [17]:
Thats what I was thinking, or the Mughals
@Ziraphen [13]:
I think its not too bad if its like the last paragraph, like some posters due with
“Interesting sidenote” or something
@Bullitt [19]:
Yeah!
On to the list:
#9 – What made the mongols great was their assimilation to the culture they conquered. For example, in China, they continued the tradition of Dynasties, and became a dynasty themselves, they didnt impose their believes. Same in the middle east when they were the ilkhannate, and the golden hoarde in the north. The only thing they tore them apart was the death of khan and the division of power after that.
#3 – Actually the vikings werent really barbarians anymore by the time that they started moving into the roman empire. By the 400s, there were so many permanent military outposts in the ‘fronteir’ that Roman legionaires often married into viking families, and the ostrogoths (sorry mispelling) and the visogoths (again sorry) were great admirers of roman culture and acheievements so much so that the former restored much of the promise that was rome when they conquered it and it was (ironically) the attempt by Justinian that tore rome down.
what about pagans who fought against all europe
the vikings did not have horn on their helmets!
No way are medieval knights number 1!
ninjas of America? Ninjas were from Japan lol
awesome list as always, btw
@wilsonelectronics [36]: my bad, read it wrongly.
Disapointed with this very childish list.
With the title I was expecting individual warriors, when I realized it was about warrior civilizations i thought “fine”, but I certainly wasn’t expecting something this basic. I didn’t learn one single thing, I just noticed the inaccuracies and mistakes…
Also, that Viking drawing is “heroic fantasy”, it surely wasn’t meant to depict a realistic viking, so no need to complain about it being fake. But sure, another picture would have suited better for the vikings.
I agree with Metal, was really hoping for an indvidual warrior list rather then a list comprised of warrior cultures, especially because it just hammered home myths and hearsay about these cultures that may or may not be proven
@Julius [25]:
Most cultures listed there would not have had ***** with younger males. Only two listed, Spartans and Romans would have accepted that.
This is wrong…where are the US soldiers. US ROCKS!!!
Retreating. Having The marines clean up their mess. Or sitting on their asses letting the marines do all the work.
no glory there they gonna be the first to run
@AAA [35]: why not medieval knights as #1?
@Julius [25]: i dont know what to say except NASTY……..and boobs …………hold on i wanna say that again -boobs…..phew now i feel better
looooooooool, naive list, made like a bed time story…
This list is made by someone who studies history through historically inaccurate movies.
@DoubleT [34]: Mmmmmm….. I don’t think so. You’re confusing the movie “Meet the Spartans” with real history. Spartans didn’t brought their male love to the battlefield. Spartan male love was developed during the man’s youth between him and his mentor. AKA Male love in Sparta only occured while the young man is still in training. Not when he’s in the battlefield.
I thought the Aztecs would make the list. They were making weapons with obsidian.
The edge of obsidian can be easily sharpened down to one molecule.
Cool list tstrubi!
Very bad list sorry. Like the others already said. Childish and full of clichés. You learn nothing at all by reading this list except inaccuracies.
But hey at least it is unintentionally funny. This is my personal ‘highlight’:
“The apaches were like the ninjas of America.”
]: @Julius [25]: -@bluesman87 [43]: ok sorry that joke was SOOO lame
The last week or so the lists have sucked big time.J Frater whats going on.
No Celts?
You all thought it – Ok I’ll say it – The Nazi war machine
hi, perhaps this will settle (or just re-spark) the whole ‘who’s the greatest’ debate we had last year.
I would have appreciated (like #18) more information on these candidates – armour class, weaponary effectiveness perhaps, more about their lifestyle, and the range of their conquests. Not that I wanna play Top Trumps here. ::)
Just to be nit-picky for a mo, I don’t know, but I don’t think the Ninja (Shinobi) ever went to war, so are they war-iors?
I think the Mongols deserve the #1 spot, followed by the Romans, the Nazis, then the British and Spanish (oh sorry, wrong list).
@Swede [25]: You beat me to it. There is no evidence at all that suggests the Vikings wore horned helmets, and I’m getting tired of seeing pictures depicting this.
What the hell warriors kill people and you want them to ask permission before they chop a guys head off!!!!!
I have read all the lists on listverse. This is by far the worst one. What was this based on?
@tryclyde [52]: So how somewhere im sure the vikings think those hats are snazzy…..
O Yeah! By the way the Zulus and the huns would have rolled some of these groups of whatever…
Scythians
You forgot about the Scythians, deadly accurate with the bow.
http://listverse.com/2010/01/05/top-10-interesting-facts-about-the-scythians/
The Scythians get my vote. They could crawl behind their horses at full gallop and use the animal's body as a shield while firing arrows back at pursuers and the female warriors were so fierce that it was believed the Scythians married Amazon warriors. That's a force to be reckoned with.
Interesting article!! =)