WARNING: spoilers. Murder is bad, wicked, evil. Most people would agree that it’s the very worst thing a human-being can do. We condemn murderers in the press, but at the same time we obsess over knowing every tiny detail. We want to know why, where, who, how: how they did it, how they became so alienated from regular functioning society, how they feel after. There’s an obsession with murder and murderers that mirrors our obsession with celebrities.
Below I have collected the top ten movies that had murderers who were sick, vile and twisted, yes, but also endearing. Murderers who we rooted for to live past the end of the movie, escape or beat the lame hero. Whether it was their charisma, the redemption they found, revenge, the message implicit in the murders or the reasons behind them, these ten murderers (all men), while we might not invite them over for dinner with our family (except for possibly # 7), all have a special place in our hearts.
Note: There are only two qualifications. The movie has to have been made in the last twenty years (since 1990), and the person in the movie has to have killed more than one person (whether on screen or implied in the time-frame of the movie).

Bateman is a unique psychopathic serial killer. He’s unbelievably handsome, fit, rich, narcissistic, and he listens to Phil Collins. The shallow, ornamental, material-based society Bateman inhabits is starting to drive him insane. The creepy, self-narrated scenes where Bateman describes his mind unraveling, while he’s doing 2,000 + sit-ups, lying in a tanning bed, or putting on kiwi facial masks more expensive than most people’s cars, are beyond disturbing.
The reason Bateman is on this list, beyond being a nerdy, yuppie serial killer, which admittedly is kind of cool, is that somehow,at some point in the movie, we begin to feel sorry for this shallow, egotistical monster, who has everything we could ever dream of.
Because, as the audience, we are given access to the lives of these rich-boy yuppies we see that their internal lives are empty. Everything’s an ornament: business cards and attractive blonde fiancés are just won to compare with the business cards and attractive blonde fiancés of other yuppies. We see that, maybe, climbing and spending lead only to more climbing and spending. Bateman’s character only evokes pity. While he does have a certain unique sense of cool, ultimately we just feel sorry for the poor demented bastard.
During one of the final scenes of the movie, where Bateman sobbingly confesses to his lawyer on the phone, (“I guess I’ve killed twenty people….maybe forty” “I ate some of their brains, and I tried to cook a little.”) we feel how scared he really is—for his sanity, for his freedom, for being revealed for who he really is. This is how Dostoevsky portrayed a person who has just committed murder in Crime and Punishment—scared, guilty, ashamed, alone, and I imagine this is how it really feels.
From the final monologue of the movie: “There is no catharsis. My punishment continues to elude me. And I gain no deeper knowledge of myself. No new knowledge can be extracted from my telling. This confession has meant nothing.”
Note: I know some of you will say that the murders never even occurred—that it was all in Bateman’s head. But you’re wrong. You’re dead wrong.

One of Quentin Tarantino’s greatest strengths is his ability to combine the ultra-violent with the everyday. This is why Pulp Fiction was so original and accessible to almost everyone who watched it. There’s murder and violence and obscenities, but there’s also Seinfeldish discussions about the most mundane topics. That these hit men might talk about the same things we talk about with our friends is surreal, and just really freaking cool. Not to mention that all the characters above are all three-dimensional and accessible. They’re bad people, but they’re not just bad people. They can be charming and worrisome and kind people, as well. Tarantino makes them human.
All three of these guys are ultimate bad-asses. They take crap from absolutely no one. Ving Rhames and Bruce Willis’s characters get the nod for their scene in that awful pawn shop together, where they were about to murder each other and instead bond with a shared decency and the disgust they both have for sexual deviants. As much as they might dislike each other—they respect each other. They might be killers, but they’re not perverted sickos.
Samuel L. Jackson gets the nod for the redemption he found. He feels like God intervened in his life and, not willing to ignore it or pass it off as coincidence, he decides to change his murdering ways. “I’m trying real hard here, Ringo.” And, though we never see what happens to him, we do witness what happens to his partner (John Travolta), who did pass the intervention off as a coincidence. Jackson’s character is the only one on this list who changed his ways. Because of that he deserves our respect, and is possibly even more bad-ass because of it.

The movie Se7ven is disturbing, frightening, dark and melancholy. And the scope of what John Doe does is jaw-dropping. A lot of serial killers brag about numbers, or trophies, or the pain they’ve caused. A lot of serial killers kill for no reason except to cause pain, but they have no vision beyond the murders; they are ends in themselves. But all of John Doe’s murders (even his own) were means to an end.
His immense scope and patience and time-in would be respectable if, say, he were doing research on cancer, or studying ancient cultures, but he’s a killer. Not just a killer—a monster. The most sadistic, depraved, frightening, intelligent monster ever shot on screen. What Hannibal Lecter did was peanuts compared to John Doe. While he only committed six murders, and never once on screen, and appeared in the film for only fifteen or twenty minutes he still remains one of the grittiest, most visceral sadists every conceived.

Vic Vega is the smoothest, most reserved psychopath ever shot on camera. Before he ever comes on screen, Mr. White and Mr. Pink create a myth of his actions in the foiled bank robbery. They imply that he’s an unhinged, psycho-deviant, without any self-control. But, when he finally arrives at the warehouse sipping soda out of a straw (what is Tarantino’s deal with food and violence), he’s the epitome of cool and calm. He stands up to the most bad-ass actor of all time: Harvey Keitel. “Are you gonna bark all day, little doggy, or are you gonna bite?”
He’s in bewilderment that Mr. White and Mr. Pink are giving him a hard time for assassinating a few expendable hostages. His calm presence makes Mr. White and Mr. Pink look like two little school-girls at their first dance. On reflection, Mr. Blonde makes every other person in this entire movie look like whiny little school-girls (besides, maybe, Joe the ringleader of the whole thing, and his son).
We feel bad for the cop getting his ear cut off—for his family—for staring into the face of a real-life psychopath, who couldn’t care less if he knows anything—just wants to torture him because he enjoys it, but damnit, it’s still one of the coolest scenes in all of cinema. Thank you Mr. Blonde.

As the title of the movie suggests, there was blood, and it was Daniel Plainview who spilt it. He’s a self-proclaimed oil man, with a menacing mustache, dark beady eyes and a stubborn limp—he drags around his leg as if it were an albatross he’s been cursed to carry. He’s stubborn and impatient; he’s an alcoholic, a self-made millionaire and father to his creepy little son. And he murders exactly two people in this movie. The first, a vagabond who made the mistake of impersonating his brother, and the second the whiny, creepy preacher, Eli Sunday, who is the only character in the movie as unhappy and misguided as Plainview.
Plainview works his whole life to build an empire, and then when he’s sitting on it he has no idea what to do with himself. He uses everything at his disposal to advance himself, but what he’s really doing is taking steps backwards, toward depravity.
He is on this list, because he’s empathetic. A lot of people really do just care about themselves. A lot of people in the world really are not good people. He hates other people, but he genuinely wants one person to whom he can relate. His son is this person, until he goes deaf in a drilling accident, and becomes unreachable to someone as impatient as Plainview. He then meets someone he believes to be his long-lost brother, and he opens up—let’s himself be vulnerable, until he finds out that it’s not his brother at all—just some drifter who wanted to cash in on his fortune. He murders him, and tries to reconnect with his son, but it’s too late.
He’s lost. He becomes exceptionally lonely, and drowns himself in decadence and alcohol in his mansion. Then he murders Eli Sunday, because he’s a slimy little weasel, yes, and he has nothing to live for, but, fundamentally, because he sees himself in Sunday. And he hates himself more than anything else in the entire world.
Note: The abruptness and finality of Eli’s murder in this movie is shocking, and unexpected. It really can be that easy to murder someone. It really can just happen when we least expect it.

Coming in at around 5’4’’, Joe Pesci plays the ultimate bad-ass in this Scorsese film. Whether he’s stabbing someone in the chest with a pen or shooting an innocent waiter to death for a mild insult, nobody ever willingly crosses Tommy Devito. He’s ruthless, dangerous, prone to violent outbursts, has severe anger issues and can kill people who cross him with any object that happens to be lying around. Basically he’s a psychotic, murderous Mafioso.
But he still functions. He has beautiful girlfriends, and cool friends, and he’s rich. Not to mention, he’s entertaining as hell to watch. He’s somebody who would be cool to hang out with, if there wasn’t a substantial chance he would stab you to death in the face. He kills because he enjoys it. But at least he’s honest.
More than any other person on this list, Tommy possesses undeniable charisma. After murdering a made guy by stabbing him in the chest with a pen, and then later a knife in his trunk, he goes and eats pasta at his sweet mother’s house with his friends, laughing and drinking like nothing happened. The scariest thing about Tommy is that he might not even be insane. He just doesn’t care. He’ll shoot you, or stab your sister, for one slip of tact. But he’s still a funny guy. (“What do you mean I’m funny? What like a clown? What I’m a clown?”)
Even though he got what was coming to him in the end, and was extremely unstable, we all still kind of wished that Tommy was getting made in his last scene instead of getting whacked.

Another unforgettable movie. While most of the characters on this list are cold-blooded murders, without any morals or empathy, Karl Childers is not one of them (even though he does eat his dinner of french fried ‘petaters’ on a table not three meters from where he just clobbered someone over the head with a lawnmower blade).
In Billy Bob Thornton’s directorial debut, Karl Childers is a semi-retarded inmate being let go from a mental hospital in the South, decades after killing his mother with a sling blade (some people call it a Kaiser blade). Days later he befriends a slow, father-less young boy, who quickly convinces his loving, but submissive, mother to let Karl live in their garage. This sounds like a simple movie, and inherently it is, but it remains one of the sweetest, most uplifting, most genuine movies ever made. Thorton’s character has been the butt of countless jokes, impersonations and even a mock movie, but he rode it all the way to the upper echelons of Hollywood.
There is no doubt in my mind that Karl is the most harmless character to ever murder two people using long, sharp objects. He’s sweet, and has the mental capacity of his slow 12-year-old friend, and so cannot be anything but honest about what he sees, does, witnesses…etc. Before murdering the abusive step-father character, Doyle (portrayed exceptionally well by country singer Dwight Yokam), with a lawnmower blade, he asks him what numbers to dial for the police. Then when Doyle asks him why he wants to know he says, “I reckon I’m gonna kill you with this here lawnmower blade.”
That last scene pretty much sums up the entire mood of the movie. A simpleton, abused by his parents, who sees the same thing happening to the boy he loves more than the world itself, and who will not allow it. This movie would be funny, if it wasn’t so heart-wrenching, to watch this simple, kind man let out into a world that’s too big for him to comprehend.
Note: Dwight Yokam’s character, Doyle, would also definitely earn a spot on the top ten people in a movie that you want to get brutally murdered.

They’re cool, casual, confident and hot. They’re funny and obnoxious and unhinged. They’re the sexiest serial killers in the world. Say hello to Mickey and Mallory Knox.
Oliver Stone got a lot of heat for making this movie. And more than one psychotic couple has cited this movie as the inspiration for their own shooting spree. John Grisham tried to sue Oliver Stone for inciting violence. Quentin Tarantino wrote the script and then removed his name entirely from the film, which I don’t understand, because I’m not sure that Tarantino could have made this movie any better, himself.
A lot of people think this movie promotes senseless violence, but I disagree, wholeheartedly. This movie is a social commentary on the United States: the media and the phoniness stuffed down our throats at every turn. Are Mickey and Mallory psychotic? Yes. Are they evil? Maybe. But they weren’t born psychotic and evil. Stone tries to make it very clear that they are products of their environment.
Neither of them were killers when they met. But there is something about their love that sparks their endless killing spree. The first time Mickey kills is to protect Mallory—who symbolizes natural love. Then something is unleashed. “You’re free, Kevin.” They go on a rampage, killing people because at least murder is something real. And while they kill randomly, without remorse or empathy, all the other main characters in the film are worse.
The cop chasing them is just as psychotic as they are, the warden is a masochistic sociopath, and the journalist (Robert Downey Jr.) is a phony who represents everything wrong with America. The journalist is worse because, even though he doesn’t have blood on his hands (at least before the ending), he represents something more damaging and irreparable. He’s perpetuating the tenets of mindless passivity—to just put filler out for the lost generation out in T.V. land to sit back and watch.
In contrast to Robert Downey Jr’s phony character, is the Native American shaman who tries to help Mickey and Mallory, and who was not a part of the society that created and shunned them. Because of this polar separation from American society, he represents the only purity in this movie. It’s important to note that this is the only victim Mickey and Mallory regret killing, and that his murder was unintentional.
They eventually slay Robert Downey Jr’s character at the end of the movie, even though he helped them escape and had an “epiphany,” which was just as fake as everything else he represented. And maybe, just maybe, you could perceive Mickey and Mallory as agents of rightful retribution, wiping out all the fakeness they see around them, because there’s no other solution. Or maybe they’re just insane.

No Country for Old Men is a masterpiece. It’s easily one of the best movies made in the last ten years. And while the two other male leads in this movie played their roles so well that I found myself gripping (literally gripping) the theatre seats in anticipation of the ending, what truly makes this movie stand out as one of the best of all time is Javiar Bardem’s character: Anton Chigurh.
He’s a vicious, cold-blooded psychopath with a bad haircut who murders everything in his path on his way from point A to point B. On the surface it might appear that he’s after money, or that he enjoys killing, but he’s really just an avenger, avenging every mistake ever made on earth. He doesn’t care whether or not his victims are specifically responsible. He’s not a cause, but a byproduct of the new evilness hinted at by the sheriff and the title of the film. He’s the embodiment of retribution and death, killing the majority of people who have the misfortune to cross his path.
He kills out of some purpose we aren’t ever shown, and has morals that we can sense but can’t really imagine. But while his other-worldliness should create a distance between himself and the audience, it is contrasted by these regular human actions, like eating a bag of peanuts while he’s deciding whether or not to kill an innocent (or is he only innocent by how we see things?), gas-station owner, or drinking a bottle of milk inside Llewelyn’s trailer, Into which he has just broken to murder everyone inside. He is human, which we can forget. He can be hurt. He gets shot and he bleeds and cringes and limps just like anyone else would. He’s not from another planet.
And he’s comedic in some way only the Cohen Brothers could have invented: this dry, matter-of-fact, awkwardly candid, honest humor that’s so bewildering and hypnotizing that we’re not even sure if it’s funny, or even whether it was meant to be. It’s this contrast that makes him so accessible. Not to mention he’s super bad-ass, self-sufficient, intelligent, cool, and he uses probably the most bad-ass weapon in any movie, ever.

Of course Dr. Lecter had to be #1 on this list. Throughout three movies he dazzled us with his charm and wit. In Silence of the Lambs, we heard about his vile crimes before we ever met the man. And, at first, we might have believed that Hannibal was just a kindly old man, trapped in a brick cell for crimes that sounded a little too exaggerated. But very soon we see that isn’t the case at all. His creepiness and power are cerebral. Within minutes of meeting her he puts dainty Clarice Starling on her psychological ass (“You know what you look like to me with you good bag and your cheap shoes, you look like a rube”) His murders are some of the most violent, and yet he remains sophisticated and respectable, no matter how deranged his actions. Not only does he have a svelte, hypnotic voice that manipulates victims and other serial killers alike, he is also the most intelligent and classy serial killer we’ve ever met.
While Mickey and Mallory Knox might dine on some greasy breakfast food at a truck-stop, our dear Hannibal requires nothing less than the finest caviar and Chianti to be found anywhere in the world. Whether cutting off guard’s faces, feeding an out-of-tune violinist to a table of aristocrats, getting one of his patients to cut off his own face and feed it to his dogs, or biting off a nurse’s tongue while his heartbeat remains under 85 beats a minute, Dr. Lecter remains a true gentleman to the end, not killing good people unless he has to, and cutting off his own hand instead of Clarice’s—his muse—when push comes to shove.
And just as we can see the progression of affection our dear Clarice feels for this man (although she would never admit it) we, too, become paralyzed by his charm, even knowing all that we know. Detective Will Graham called him insane, and he probably is—must be—but a part of all Hannibal’s fans realize how thin the line between genius and insanity really is.
Honorable Mentions: Leon (The Professional), Ryan Gosling (Murder By Numbers), Travis Bickle (Taxi Driver), Dennis Hopper (Out of the Blue and Blue Velvet), Benicio Del Toro (21 grams).



















Omgosh! I've never watched any of these O.O
Time to get downloading then!
I recommend Silence of the Lambs first!
Seriously? Wow lol, I haven't seen some of them (2,4,5,6) but I'm really surprised that you haven't seen Silence of the Lambs or Pulp Fiction, Lot's of great movies =.)
dude, about time. the only one i havent seen is Sling Blade. I'll look for it today.
You really need to see sling blade and silence of the lambs!
"Of course, Dr. Lecter had to be #1 on this list"
He's #10????
My #1 right now would have to be Hit-Girl from Kick-Ass.
Yes, yes, yes. Oh my God YES.
Hit-Girl and Big Daddy were awesome, but they weren't really murderers. They were super-heroes.
Super heroes don't murder if they can help it. They bring the wrong-doers to justice and lets the law handle them, never taking matters into the heroes own hands. Big Daddy and Hit Girl were murderers in capes.
That's not true about all the so called super heroes. Some of them would kill a bad guy without a blink of an eye.
most of those guys get classified as 'anti-heroes'. Wolverine, Deadpool, i don't know who else lol. I don't think there have been any heroes that kill who have been glorified in the way Batman or Superman (or the villain has to be an alien/monster, human killing seems to be a no no).
I like to think Hit-Girl and Big Daddy represent how real life 'superheroes' would really react in those situations.
Hit girl is noting compared to these, maybe better than the tarentino characters on the list, but you can't compare her to Hannibal, Anton Chigurh, John doe, Tommy devito and Daniel Plainview, cuz those are all better characters.
totally agree with #1
I relly think Dexter should have been in this list =)
Dexter is indeed a complicated and endearing character who has us rooting for him in every situation, but unfortunately, this list was made about movie characters only, as stated in the introduction. Perhaps some ambitious list writer will come up with a list of televion murderers we secretly love. Any takers?
Straight away, I thought of Dexter and Sylar for that topic. HINTHINT to list writer. :3
indeed, Sylar for #1 if this list was about TV villains.
HINTHINT? You mean: nudge nudge, wink wink?
Benjamin Linus for #1
Without a doubt, and the Boondock Saints deserved at least an honorable mention…
Agreed, if TV killers were included. AND, anyone who hasn't seen Dexter, you are really missing out. Best TV show ever.
One of the best. Twin Peaks must be up there also, as far as TV shows are concerned. And Ren & Stimpy.
I thought of Dexter too until I read that the list was from movies only.
No 2 – Willis, Jackson, Rhymes
Rhames perhaps?
Indeed. Corrected. Thanks.
Bring out the Gimp
Fabienne: Whose motorcycle is this?
Butch: It's a chopper, baby.
Fabienne: Whose chopper is this?
Butch: It's Zed's.
Fabienne: Who's Zed?
Butch: Zed's dead, baby. Zed's dead.
nice list.
tony montana from scarface is cool too
Hmm, I thought the door was left open as to whether Bateman murdered anyone at all?
***** you Prawnburger! Hmmmm stick it up ye butthole.
hah the author of the list mentioned that and I deleted it. So you are not alone in thinking it
man — deleting it was a weird move j.
i mean– for the purposes of this list, deleting it was probably smart — this is a ""murderers you secretly love"", not the list of"" people who daydreamed about *****ing people's worlds up"".
im sure you were able to predict that someone at some point was gonna say this, and spark a couple retorts. i suppose you do know what youre doing
the scene when bateman is instructed by an atm, to feed a homeless cat — it all spiraled downhill for them, and many others. — in a way it just opened up more something.
—–why was allen's apt empty when bateman went to check it out.
—–why is it that bateman's lawyer is eating dinner with allen (who is supposed to be dead at that point)
—–why was everyone ignoring him all the time
actually, in "Lunar Park" Bret Easton Ellis himself mentions that the murders taking place in "American Psyco" was all a part of the narrators fantasies. His use of himself as a protagonist in the supernatural story of "Lunar Park" just confirms his love for unreliable narrators, ..wich also makes the statement above kind of questionable. hm..
I couldn't agree more with this list, I've seen all 10 of these movies, and 8 of them would be in at least my top 15, I'm very happy with number one as that is my favorite of the list and one of my favorite performances in a movie (definitely Christian's best).
Personally I think I would have moved Hannibal and Anton into the 5th and 6th places and moved the others back, their performances were amazing. Honestly, even though he did murder two people, I just don't see Daniel Plainview as a murderer, but it's no secret that I loved his performance.
Great list! Completely agree with:
Hannibal
John Doe
Patrick Batemen
and Daniel Plainview – but probably because I have a crush on Daniel Day-Lewis
oh.
i went through the list without noticing it's a 90-present list. so i guess Tony Montana isn't qualified to be in this list.
it is specifically about murderers only. Montana did kill people but usually for power, money or control.
We all love Montana, but he does not belong in the context of this particular list.
That’s not true. Pesci’s character from Goodfellas killed for power and money, too. He killed to get higher in the Mafia. Yes, he enjoyed it a litle too much, but so did Montana. The only reason Tony Montana couldn’t be on this list is the timeframe.
I know he’s not a movie character but a TV one, but, Dexter Morgan.. He’s my favorite murderer
Where's Light Yagami? He's perfect for this list!
I'd go with Lelouch personally but yeah i agree with you
It was a flautist,Benjiman Raspail, that Hannibal killed and fed to the Orchestral Board of Directors wasnt it?
Great list.Seen them all,need to watch Slingblade again soon…
Yeah I think this was posted in reverse order.
Bateman is a legende, a cult classic! It is a shame the film did not quite live up to the book
I am kinda glad it didn't – I had to stop reading the book because the violence churned my stomach. On the other hand, the movie was a pleasure to watch.
Well, did you stop just for a while and finish the book later? Or did you stop altogether and never finished it?
I stopped altogether. I have read other books by Ellis but have never finished American Psycho. I am sure in time I will go back to it.
You should. If you get past the violence (which is pretty gruesome, I'll admit that), you might enjoy Ellis's dry humour, etc. Plus, the ending is a bit confusing… like it's meant to be, I suppose.
I agree with L, Yagami Light AKA Kira is one of my personal favourite killers. Correct me if i'm wrong but i think his body count is higher than all of the top 10 combined.
These are all fiction.
there is no such thing as a good real murder.
You make a very good point.
Would we love the characters on this list if they were actually our neighbor or a family member?
I can say that some of these fictional characters are necessary to our human desire for justice in some situations that we know will be unpunished. (like Karl Childers in Slingblade.) To have a fictional character helps to release some of the outrage we feel when we see the weak harmed in our everyday real life.
It also reminds us that though we as humans in society don't need to go to the extreme that Karl went to, to ensure his young friend's safety, we are morally bound to do what we can legally to help the abused.
Some of the other characters mentioned here help relieve us of the impotent anger we feel when we come across others who stomp upon the niceties we grew up with. Hannibal Lector mentions he prefers to eat the "rude". Free-range rude, I believe he calls them.
Who here hasn't fantasized at one time or another a little bit of social pruning when being in the midst of an absolute boor, or the selfish, or the cringingly stupid? You can almost see Lector's actions as a way to keep the gene pool vibrant and forward moving.
I'm sure there are many other pros to having an imaginary killer to keep our true human hands free of blood, but I try to resist the urge to go all wordy on my soapbox.
Maybe some of the other readers can give some feedback on the subject.
Agreed. However, I think the point wasn't a justification of their actions. It was rather the depth and complexity to their characters that make them fascinating to us. It's easy to make a character in a story who is just plain evil and easy to hate, but the storytellers above have taken one of the worst transgressions a person can commit and skewed our view of it, sometimes to the point of questioning the characters' "evilness", so to speak.
Plus I don't think IanT made any mention of these people actually being "good" people.
However, I think an interesting idea for a list would be "Top 10 Murderers You Secretly Love (Real-Life Edition)." I guess it sort of has already been done by lists of murderers in the past, but I think someone could put a new spin on it.
A wery well written and very well thought list. This is why I visit this site every day.
Billy Bob Thornton's portrayal of Karl Childers was both brilliant and heartbreaking. No one who watched this movie could fail to be moved by his innocent naivete and his genuine love for the child he befriends. Both murders he committed could be argued to be justifiable when all the facts are known. But, in my mind, Karl committed no crime at all. He was merely acting on his reasonable assumption that people deserve to be treated with respect, whoever they may be. I loved this movie, and I am happy that it was included in this list. Nice job, IanT!
Hannibal should have been number 1. As much as I love Christian Bale and his portrayal of Patrick Bateman in American Psycho, Hannibal Lecter should have been number 1! Number 2 spot goes to Patrick Bateman; he has a hot ass; the shower scene, AAH!
Maybe you want to look at the numbers again. This list starts from #10 Patrick Bateman, and counts up to #1 – Hannibal Lecter.
i thought tom cruises' character from collateral was pretty cool
Anton Chigurh is totally my favourite. ( Great movie too.) He is cold, get's the job done, can fix his own gunshot wounds, and doesn't even let something like eating lunch get in the way of the job at hand. Next time I need someone taken care of, I will hire him. (Yes, I know he is fictional.)
"Are you going to kill me?"
"That depends. Do you see me?"
Awesome.
The spoilers you provided were generally unnecessary to divulge in making your list, I'm still swimming about why you included them- especially the ones at the end for Goodfellas and NBK. Oh well. At least you provided a warning.
Aside from that, I'd agree with plenty of these. And more than that, I appreciate you refraining from including slasher/horror/comicbook characters like Jason, Joker or Jigsaw.
Keep up the good work!
I was kind of expecting Heath Ledger's Joker, though. I think he'd have been a good addition, myself.
Nice call on the Jigsaw suggestion.
Though it may be time to let the franchise rest in peace. To continue to milk a dead cow might be rude enough to warrant a trip into one of Jigsaw's character building "puzzles" for the makers themselves.
Every sigle one of these films are honestly excellent, but your words on Anton Chigurh are so true.
Also; "But, when he finally arrives at the warehouse sipping soda out of a straw (what is Tarantino’s deal with food and violence)" made me laugh pretty hard
backwards
That was a surprisingly good list. The *****ysis was both deep and to the point. Very nice.
I just noticed that Christian Bale's most famous roles are Patrick Bateman and Batman… Neat
Hey – I never noticed that! How weird. Maybe he could appear next in a Simpson's film as "Bartman"! Just to complete the trilogy.
Another slightly more random connection to evil people is that his character in Empire of the Sun was named "Jamie" and Jame Gumb (Buffalo Bill) is the name of the bad guy in the silence of the lambs film (listed here also). Spooky.
….and your name is Jamie! The connection is just too strong. Do you have anything to tell us? Homicidal tendencies or anything? LV is an accepting place. You're safe here.
Yes, Good list. But, Hannibal along with Bateman should be the bottom 2. And No country for old men sucks ball sack.
American Psycho is defintly one of my favourite films of all time. Bale is brilliant in it.
"Try getting a reservation at Dorsia now you *****lng stupid bastard!"
hahah that was one of my favorite parts too! And the part where he pretended to his secretary (Chloe Sevigny) that had managed to get reservations THAT DAY at Dorsia and she gave him a look of complete disbelief. That film just has so many great moments!
I can recite the business card scene, word for word because i've watched it so much. It's just such a quotable movie.
"Do you guys know Ed Gein?"
"Ed Gein? Maitre'd at C***** bar?
Read the book people, it makes the movie look tame in comparisson. Bale was great.
I'm actually reading the book at the moment, it's on my desk.
Well, i shot a man in Reno, just to watch him die…
Johnny Cash
The Anthony Hopkins Hannibal seems a bit too suave I think. Brian cox’s portrayal in manhunter was creepy and menacing, much more like lector should be.
I don't think I could love the Lektor from Manhunter…..Sir Anthony Hopkins all the way.
i watched manhunter a few weeks ago and said the same exact thing. it kind of ruined the movie for me!! hah
I have put the list back into the order in which it was sent and added back some of the comments the author made. Obviously he knew this topic better than I
i am aware that in movies, there are lots of characters written in vastly diifferent styles, with different points of focus, etc., that a list like this serves as an excellent building block for conversation and debate. most everyone will have one character in their mind that is justified over someone else's pick for various reasons. these lists kick ass but in 3 years, i think iive only seen about 5 comments that said "i wouldnt change a damn thing" — anyway, ian…..very nice.
i want to point out one — i was super skeptical when someone told me to go see mr. brooks a couple years ago. aside from the fact that the plot read familiar and uncomplicated, and i cant stand 4 of the 5 main actors. demi moore, as the cop — ok —- not a fan of cook, w.hurt, costner (unless hes playing baseball–see: ray kinsella and crash davis), or helgenburger
anyway i was pleasently surprised.
it was no amer. psycho (which did deserve to be at #1 i.m.o. — even thought im not convinced he killed anyone — see furture comment), but written with interesting premeses, and played out in fairly original manner
if youve seen this movie, you must acknowledge one thing —–
it must must get an honourable mention (or a special slot at #8.5 or something) for the simple reason that:
he kills dane cook
on screen
with a shovel
thanks to everyone who had a part in this wonderful piece of cinematic imagry.
Excellent choices – well written and researched
Hey there. Killers we love? I can see it in some of these but only a few. Yeah, that scene in Pulp Fiction where the Travolta character accidentally blows the guys head off in the back seat of a car is one of the funniest things I’ve ever seen. That dialogue is a masterpiece! So yeah, I love all the killers in that movie.
I also love that Pesci guy in Goodfellas – “Yeah funny how? – I amuse YOU??”. Yeah he was great.
My other personal favs include:
Jack Nicholson in Batman (original)
Gene Hackman in Superman 1/2
Clint Eastwood (in anything)
Arnie in Terminator 2
oh and Darth Vader.
oooooo…….Darth Vader….for whatever reason, I got a soft spot for him. He's a cool villain.
This was a great list! I agree with all of these choices and so many more that it would be hard to choose which. Kudos for taking that on!
I saw in the comments about adding Light Yagami…..he fits this list perfectly. I have the movie Death Note (live action movie not the anime) and would say it was awesome to watch him become so cold and calculating.
Anyway, really enjoyed the list.
But the anime version is great as well.
hans landa from inglorious basterds defenitly
Loved the list and loved all of these movies. Nice job IanT. Want to watch almost every one of these again right now. And since they have been posted on such a mainstream site, I don't feel like nearly the morbid ghoul for loving them.
I WAS a little surprised not to see The Bride from "Kill Bill 1 and 2", but have to say that your list was very well rounded.
Also, thank-you for the tidbit about Tarantino doing the script for Natural Born Killers. I never knew and will enjoy passing that little nugget of knowledge to friends and family.
One entry I can't get behind would have to be the Joe Pesci dude in Goodfellas. He always struck me as a rabid dog with jealousy issues. I can respect the Mafia's method of justice, and have always seen the practicality of the hitman profession, but Tommy DeVito was rather too out of control for my taste.
u might find it weird but in most movies i always want the bad guy to win…does that say anything about me??
You should watch "The Great Silence" by Sergio Corbucci, with Klaus Kinski as the bad guy.
One question though….
Why was the entry for Pulp Fiction the only one titled by the actor's names as opposed to the characters they played in the entry?
I know that it has no bearing on the awesomeness of the list, and I know I've opened myself to the finger pointing cries that will label me some kind of Nazi, but it just stuck out at me and I had to ask.
Whoa everyone, watch out! The Consistency Nazi is on the loose!
(I was kind of wondering the same thing)
somebody just beat me to it. colonel hans landa (christoph waltz) in inglorious basterds. the opening scene is, i think, one of the best in cinema. the colonel is talkative, polite, intriguing and completely comitted to killing all jews he comes across. i was going to be pretty upset if he didn't win the academy award for best supporting actor.
"What Hannibal Lecter did was peanuts compared to John Doe." Then why is John Doe so far down on the list? Why is he not #1, or at the very least, #2? Great list otherwise…
Very excellent list. Maybe my favorite Lv movie list ever. Great job!
I, to this day, still can't watch the torture scene from Reservoir Dogs. There are many more blatantly violent offerings that I can sit through. Maybe it's the background music used to great effect by Q.T. As always. The very ordinariness (although awesome 70's fare) of the tunes made the torture some how worse.
And I too agree – Christoph Waltz was awesome in Inglorious Basterds. Deserving of the accolades and the oscar.
I really enjoyed this list.. well done sir!
One point of contention i have is how John Doe found himself on this list. This delusional man only murdered others to satisfy his penchant for divine retribution of sorts. He has absolutely no redeeming qualities whatsoever (that i can imagine), and the author makes no mention of any characteristics that could make the viewer empathetic to him. I don't find anything enviable or redeeming about the character whatsoever.
one movie murderer i love is otis from house of 1000 corpses and the devils rejects. That whole family you fall for! i remember watching it with my sister, and halfway through the movie i said, "is it weird that i love them all?' she laughs and says "i was going to ask you the same question." You feel bad for them, instead of glad when they die. its very psychological.
I agree, but the whole family and not just Otis. The genre change in the movies was the reason so many people felt bad for them in Devil's Rejects at the end. Going from being the ones commiting the violence/torture in House of 1,000 Corpses to being shown as humans that are vulnerable in Devil's Rejects. When they are tied up and being totured by the Sheriff you really feel bad for them especially when Captain Spaulding tries to deflect some pain from Baby by trying to "claim" one of the photos. In the first movie they appear deranged and it's hard to evoke any "love" for them, but by the "sequel" showing that "monsters" really do have feelings it puts them back on a relatable/human level. Both excellent movies!! And I could talk all day about how I LOVE Daniel Plainview from There Will Be Blood, but this post is already long enough!!
yeah i agree with everything you said. i kind of meant the whole family, so i dont know why i only wrote otis. but no, you really do feel bad for them in the ending, not going to deny that at all!
Agreed, so much. After watching House of 1000 Corpses with a friend, I told her that at the end of Devil's Rejects, she would feel bad for the Fireflys and be rooting for them. She couldn't understand how. That family definitely should have been on here.
She still can't.
Thank-you Guest. I might have been intrigued by the actions of the family through the two movies. But love them? Not even close. They were a bunch of inbred torturers that had absolutely no redeeming qualities.
The minor torture they received in Devil's Rejects was nothing more than a mosquito bite compared to the amount of suffering they laid down on 4 family albums of victims.
The final run straight into death wasn't heroic or noble, it was just the only option left to a carfull of optionless deviant rednecks.
Deviant rednecks? Or perhaps "people rejected by society"? For me the transition as weirdo backwoods lunatics into actual people with back stories cemented the fact that they ARE worthy of some kind of empathy or for some viewers, love. Any movie focusing on the serial killer point of view normally captures the few human characteristcs that the killer/s has and perhaps offers a reasoning on why the individual/s decides to murder people. The top 10 list includes murderers that killed to get rid of the "bad" people that were not what they thought worthy of living, people who had wronged them or people who were in the wonrg place at the wrong time.
So how is it that they can illicit feelings of love whereas the Firefly family does not. Sure there were a lot of "innocents" killed-some because of the wrong place-wrongtime factor , but others were spared that COULD have been killed ("Goober" at the liquor store, the woman & her child that Captain Spaulding let go). The family also showed a sense of love/caring with one another with the banter between Baby, Otis and Spaulding about ice cream and Mother Firefly's concern for her daughter in the beginning shoot out and the women saying I love you to one another. If some empathy is to be evoked it certainly would come from The Devil's Rejects and not House of 1,000 Corpses, but to say they are not deserving of "love" would be quite hypocritical seeing the other characters mentioned in the list. Yes they are sick, sadistic, and at times, cruelty at it's finest, but if you can "secretly love" some of the other "madmen" listed, then why not a little love for the rejects….Hell doesn't want them, hell doesn't need them, hell doesn't love them, this world rejects them-but I, for one, LOVE them!
The banter between Baby, Otis and Spaulding could have just as easily happened over a victim's liver or other body part.
One little scene that involves ice cream does not a hero make.
No the scene doesn't "make a hero" in showing the banter, but it does show they have feelings for one another, nevermind the situation they are in at the time. I don't feel the other entries on the list are heroes either. I never argued them to be heroes, but I do think there were many viewers of the movies that liked or "loved" the characters they portrayed. They are ruthless and savage at times, but you can see the love they have for one another and their strength as a "family". I believe each character had redeeming qualities about them, not necessarily saying they were not majorly flawed, but still very likeable as who they were.
did anyone actually root for john doe though? For me of all the characters in the list, he is the one i least had any empathy for whatsoever, he wasn't charming like lecter, he wasn't in the movie long enough for us to know anything about him or understand his motivations…he was a john doe! so why do people like him at all in the film, all i wanted to know was why he did what he did and i wanted him to get his just desserts, at no point was i rooting for the sicko.
"and i wanted him to get his just desserts"
I think THAT very sentence is why he made it into this list.
I don't get it, how does me wanting him to die an equally sickening death equate to him being a 'murderer you secretly love.' With some of the others, im not gonna lie i wanted them to get away with their crimes but him i felt the same repulsion for that i feel for most serial killers so how does he fit in this list? The introduction for this list states that these are murderers we root for to escape, I certainly didn't want him to get away.
whoops forgot to use the reply button
Oh deeziner i finally thought back to the movie which i watched years ago and got what you meant. Good point, However i still dont believe he fits the list criteria of being endearing or for us rooting for him.
Jean Reno as Leon is one of my favorites, but i totally agree with you on 2. No Country for Old Men also has one of my fav "walking away from an explosion without looking at it"-scene.
I don't get it, how does me wanting him to die an equally sickening death equate to him being a 'murderer you secretly love.' With some of the others, im not gonna lie i wanted them to get away with their crimes but him i felt the same repulsion for that i feel for most serial killers so how does he fit in this list? The introduction for this list states that these are murderers we root for to escape, I certainly didn't want him to get away.
How about the Boondock Saints? Also, the scene where they accidentally shoot the cat was just as funny when they shot Marvin in the face in Pulp Fiction.
Nice list
There will be blood – Love Daniel. DO NOT love or relate to No Country for Old Men! It was a good film (There Will Be Blood was better), gripping, suspensful.. but didn't relate to Javier Bardem's character.
What about Alex from A Clockwork Orange?
CO well predates the time frame of the list. Otherwise a definite possibility.
Cheers
Lee
How about all the muurderers in ALL tarantino movies.
I agree with ya there.
Mr.Blonde from Reservoir dogs is the elite of Tarantino bad guys.
Real life murderers can be charming, too. Serial killer Ted Bundy received quite a lot of lonely hearts fan mail while in prison.
When I saw the title I thought, "Oh, Lecter, Numero Uno, without a doubt." Glad you didn't disappoint.
@wade2528 – Alex from A Clockwork Orange only killed one person, an older woman, and even that was an accident, so he wouldn't qualify for the list (have to have killed more than once). Also, that movie was made before 1990, disqualifying it twice. But I still would have left it off, because for as much as I was fascinated by the character, I didn't secretly like him, and would NOT have wanted to spend any time with him – contrary to most of the murderers who made the list.
Perhaps the title should have mentioned that these are fictional characters.
Perhaps you should have seen the spoiler warning and realize there are no spoilers for real life.
I'm not sure what the qualifiers for this list are. Somebody suggested Scarface but was shot down cause "he did it for money and power". Well so did the three guys from pulp fiction and Daniel Plainview and Vic Vega.
You should rename this list "people who killed people in a movie that I liked released after 1990".
"Note: There are only two qualifications. The movie has to have been made in the last twenty years (since 1990),"
?
Does anybody read the introduction anymore
Ok, that is the worst criteria for a list ever. That's like saying "greatest guitarists of ALL TIME", and the criteria is that they have to be as new as 2000 and they can only play music that I like. This list blows because murderers can only have one murder, and they can predate 1990. It's unfair, and it's just an excuse to have as many Tarantino movies as possible on here.
I read the intro fool. I was referring to the fact that half these people are tarantino creations. which means that they are MADE to be cool and ergo likable. The other half are serial killers who are MADE to be creepy/deplorable. Thus with the tarantino types you like cause they are ultra cool most of the time and hate them because they have relatively minor indiscretions. Whereas the real killers on the list you hate because they are ultra deplorable and like because they have some minor cool points.
The Tarantino characters are like a car that gets good gas mileage because its been stripped of all the parts that make it a decent car. Whereas the other killers are like a car that has been built well and gets good mileage cause of good engineering. The former you like cause they are bombastic cartoons which serve one purpose. the latter you like because they manage to evoke the actual persona of a killer and end up being well rounded characters because of this.
Actually Vic Vega didn't make the list.. (which I don't understand.)
The entry for Pulp Fiction only covered the characters played by Bruce Willis, Sam Jackson and Ving Rhames. No Travolta.
I know, a little snarky of me, but I've already left a comment somewhat on that subject.
what the hell? Vic vega is No.7 dude. READ.
In the second paragraph of her post, it’s apparent that she was referring to Vincent Vega, the Travolta character in PF, not Vic Vega from RD. As an aside (you probably already know this), the two characters are brothers.
what? no Jean Reno as Leon?
i think he played a wonderful killer.
but otherwise another interesting list and a spur to re watch some classic movies.
The only good quality about 'No Country for Old Men' was Anton Chigurh. Hated the rest of the movie: should had never won Best Picture. However, the presentation of Chigurh should be why no one should screw around with other people's illegalities.
i have to watch Silence of the Lambs at least once a month. Anthony Hopkins sends chill down my spine everytime.
No country for old men sucked!!!!!!!!
I hated the ending especially. But i will admit that Chigurh was F-ing freaky. He was really the only good part to the whole thing.
I know its weird, but i couldn't help but feel as though Gerard Butler from Law abiding citizen should be on here. Maybe a bad guy, maybe a good guy. You decide>