Top 10 Bizarre Surgical Procedures
Published on September 25, 2007 - 64 Comments
WARNING: This list contains images of surgery. This list does not include surgical procedures that are now obsolete or obsolescent. The list also excludes cosmetic surgical procedures.
1. Hemispherectomy
Believe it or not, this surgical procedure involves removing or disabling an entire half of the brain. This procedure is used to treat a variety of seizure disorders where the source of the epilepsy is localized to a broad area of a single hemisphere of the brain. It is reserved for cases which can’t be managed with medication alone. The first time this surgery was performed on a human was in 1923 by Walter Dandy. All of the patients who receive this treatment suffer from partial or full paralysis on the side of the body opposite to the side of the brain removed. Most patients who have undergone this procedure will have neurons from the remaining hemisphere take over the tasks from the lost hemisphere by making new neural connections.
2. Hemicorporectomy
Also known as translumbar amputation, this surgery removes the lower half of the body from above the pelvis. The result is that the sexual organs, anus, rectum, legs, pelvis bones, and urinary system are removed. It is a severely mutilating procedure recommended only as a last resort for patients with severe and potentially fatal illnesses such as osteomyelitis, tumors, severe traumas and intractable decubiti in, or around, the pelvis. This surgery has only been performed in a small number of cases. The surgical procedure is often done in two stages; however it is possible to conduct the surgery in one stage. The first stage is the discontinuation of the waste functions in colostomy (rectum) and ileal conduit (bladder). The second stage will be the actual amputation.
3. Bilateral Cingulotomy
This is a brain surgery used in pain treatment for severe cases of cancer. It involves disabling the cingulate gyrus, a small section of brain that connects the limbic region of the brain with the frontal lobes. It has also found use in psychosurgery (surgery for mental disorders) where it is very controversial. As a psychosurgical treatment it has almost totally replaced lobotomy as a procedure. Its use for alleviation of pain in cancer patients is reasonably well-documented and well-supported, but its use in treating people with depression is not.
4. Endoscopic Thoracic Sympathectomy
ETS is a surgery in which oprtions of the sympathetic nerve trunk are dissected. By cutting these nerve sections, the surgeon is able to treat severe cases of hyperhydrosis (excess sweating). What makes this bizarre is that a side-effect of this treatment is that the person no longer blushes. For that reason it has also become a cosmetic procedure for people who blush excessively. If only one side of the body is treated, a person who has undergone this surgery will have half of their body blushing while the other half remains in its natural state. For this reason the treatment is always performed on both sides of the body.
5. Vaginectomy
In a Vaginectomy, part or all of the vagina is surgically removed. This is normally used as a treatment for various forms of cancer but it also occurs in some sexual reassignment surgeries. It is normal for a surgeon to reconstruct the vagina after this surgery by using other parts of the patient’s body.
6. Lobotomy
Lobotomy is a very controversial medical treatment in which the frontal lobes of the brain are destroyed. It consists of cutting the connections to and from, or simply destroying, the prefrontal cortex. While it is seldom performed nowadays, it does still occur. Lobotomies have been used in the past to treat a wide range of mental illnesses including schizophrenia. This procedure often results in major personality changes or even mental retardation. President Kennedy’s sister was given a lobotomy. Wikipedia has this to say:
Rosemary Kennedy, sister of President John F. Kennedy, was given a lobotomy when her father complained to doctors about the 23-year-old’s moodiness and growing interest in men. The procedure was personally performed by Walter Freeman. Instead of producing the desired result, however, the lobotomy reduced Rosemary to an infantile mentality that left her incontinent and staring blankly at walls for hours. Her verbal skills were reduced to unintelligible babble. To avoid political scandal, the nature of Rosemary’s affliction was hidden by her father for years, described to the public as the result of mental retardation. Her sister, Eunice Kennedy Shriver, founded the Special Olympics in her honor in 1968.
7. Penectomy
A Penectomy is the total removal of all, or parts, of the penis. It is normally used as a treatment for cancer, but it has sometimes had to be performed after a botched circumcision. Some men have undergone penectomies as a voluntary body modification, but professional opinion is divided as to whether or not the desire for penile amputation is a pathology, thus including it as part of a body dysmorphic disorder.
8. Circumcision
Circumcision is a very common procedure performed for religious reasons (amongst Jews and Muslims) and by many doctors who claim health benefits. Much controversy surrounds this procedure (in which the foreskin of the penis is surgically removed) as it is a non-essential surgery normally performed on a child that has no say in whether it is performed or not. Some adult men develop psychological issues as a result of circumcision, which leads us to the next bizarre surgery: foreskin restoration.
9. Foreskin Restoration
Foreskin restoration is the process of expanding the residual skin on the penis, via surgical or non-surgical methods, to create the appearance of a natural foreskin (prepuce) covering the glans penis. Foreskin restoration techniques are most commonly undertaken by men who have been circumcised or who have sustained an injury, but are also used by uncircumcised men who desire a longer foreskin and by men who have phimosis. Some men cite a desire to regain a sense of control over their sexual organs and regaining lost self esteem. European Jews, along with men circumcised for medical reasons, sought out underground foreskin restoration operations during World War II as a method to escape Nazi persecution.
10. Lindbergh Operation
The Lindbergh Operation is included here as a special mention. It was the first surgery ever performed entirely with robots being guided by doctors through telecommunications. The surgery occurred in France and was controlled by French doctors in New York. The operation was performed successfully on September 7th, 2001 by Professor Jacques Marescaux and his team from the IRCAD (Institute for Research into Cancer of the Digestive System). This was the first time in medical history that a technical solution proved capable of reducing the time delay inherent to long distance transmissions sufficiently to make this type of procedure possible. The 45-minute procedure consisted in removing the gallbladder of a patient in surgical ward A in Strasbourg Civil Hospital, in Eastern France. From New York, the surgeon controlled the arms of the ZEUS™ Robotic Surgical System, designed by Computer Motion, to operate on the patient. The link between the robotic system and the surgeon was provided by a high-speed fiberoptic service deployed thanks to the combined efforts of several France Telecom group entities.
Sources: Wikipedia
Technorati Tags: Bizarre, surgery
Related ListsTop 10 Things You Didn’t Know the Ancients HadTop 10 Bizarre Piercing Images 10 More Bizarre Videos Top 10 Bizarre Mustaches |
SubscriptionsLike this article? Subscribe to the RSS feed to keep 'em coming, or subscribe via email: |
If you find this site helpful, please leave a donation so you can enjoy the spirit of giving too.
Email This Post












1. Cyn - September 25th, 2007 at 8:00 am
ETS is a surgery in which oprtions of the sympathetic nerve trunk are dissected
uh..that’d be portions
otherwise..cool list! gruesome but cool.
2. jfrater - September 25th, 2007 at 8:08 am
Cyn: oops
3. Juggz - September 25th, 2007 at 8:36 am
Gruesome but enlightening.
4. conni - September 25th, 2007 at 8:40 am
Ugh!! They still do lobotomies?? I find that barbaric and primitive. I have seen one performed and it is really disturbing. Gee, a moody 23 year old interested in men? What a scandalous girl! Not!! Stupid man. Great list again! Thanks jfrater!
5. jfrater - September 25th, 2007 at 8:48 am
conni: apparently so. It is not legal in many Western countries but apparently they do still happen from time to time. I agree about it being disturbing. Especially when they knew the result was often retardation!
6. mix2323 - September 25th, 2007 at 9:18 am
Penectomy thats a little scary if you know what i mean
7. wowzer - September 25th, 2007 at 9:45 am
Great list! I love nothing more than finishing my breadsticks at lunch and seeing amputees. Thank you List Universe!
8. Kelsi - September 25th, 2007 at 11:36 am
Circumcision…most bizzare? Hm. I dunno.
How about a Top 10 most common/ asked for cosmetic surgeries?
9. Adia - September 25th, 2007 at 11:54 am
Lobotomies should only be performed on serial murderers and rapists in my opinion. Who knows it might make their time in prison easier for them to handle.
10. Hannah - September 25th, 2007 at 5:40 pm
My mother works for a general practitioner who has to perform a couple of circumcisions each year on older boys/men thanks to chronic infections of the foreskin. I know that this is a big debate, but there there are medical benefits to circumcising a penis.
11. conni - September 25th, 2007 at 6:06 pm
Hannah, I agree about medical benefits to circumcision. I have 3 sons and the first wasn’t circumcised. That experience made me decide to have the next two done. The first one had some minor but annoying trouble.
12. jfrater - September 25th, 2007 at 10:16 pm
I am constantly impressed by the quality of the comments on this site! Keep it up everyone - and thanks
13. heavenlymayday - September 26th, 2007 at 8:52 am
The thing with circumcision is this- it is not necessary, at all. It can be beneficial if someone develops a problem but I really don’t think that foreskin problems are at all as common as some would think. When a foreskin is not messed with it is a beneficial organ. Many instances of infection and problems in foreskins are the result of misinformation, namely- many parents are told that if they have an intact son they have to pull back the foreskin and clean under it at every diaper change. This is not only completely unnecessary, but VERY harmful. In an intact penis the foreskin is fused to the tip of the penis like a fingernail is to the finger- and it’s supposed to be that way! It protects the infants penis from harmful materials (like urine and feces) and injury. It is not supposed to be retractable until the child is older, sometimes not even until puberty. When a child’s foreskin is forcibly retracted it causes small tears in the skin and opens the foreskin up for infections and problems.
I could go on and on, but I’ll stop. It is a procedure that fits perfectly into bizarre surgical procedures. How many other amputations are performed routinely as a matter of course on infants with no medical necessity? As far as I am concerned it equates to the same thing as removing an appendix because it might get infected or surgically removing fingernails to prevent hangnail infections. It’s circular- if the foreskin is not removed it might become infected and need to be removed later… Ok, so to keep from having to remove something you remove it anyways?
Oops, I was going to stop…
14. matticus - September 26th, 2007 at 10:30 am
i was going to point out some of the points of why i thought circumcision has a rightful spot on this list, but it looks like heavenlymayday beat me to the punch. thanks
great list.
15. jfrater - September 26th, 2007 at 10:38 am
great comments - thanks
16. heavenlymayday - September 26th, 2007 at 10:39 am
The hard part was keeping myself from going on. I think that there are better venues to discuss this topic out there though so I cut it relatively short.
Oh and I agree, great list.
17. jfrater - September 26th, 2007 at 10:41 am
heavenlymayday: you should definitely not hold back - the lists are here to promote the discussions - this is the perfect venue
18. chace - September 26th, 2007 at 11:46 am
“Circumcision…most bizzare? Hm. I dunno.
How about a Top 10 most common/ asked for cosmetic surgeries?”
Kelsi, BIZARRE does not mean uncommon, rare, original or out of the ordinary. It’s more of a reference to strange or far fetched. I’m assuming you’re female by your name, and by the fact that you don’t think having a knife to your penis is crazy! =)
It certainly fits the bizarre list.
Oh, and cool list jfrater.
19. jfrater - September 26th, 2007 at 11:49 am
chace: thanks
20. ben - September 26th, 2007 at 4:08 pm
Ew weird list….keep em comin!
21. jfrater - September 26th, 2007 at 11:19 pm
ben: I will definitely do that
22. batesman - September 27th, 2007 at 2:23 am
I dunno, being circumsised has made it helluva lot easier to get genital piercings, so I really don’t mind all that much.
Speaking of which, I’d hereby suggest a list of the most unusual piercings. Uvula. Gums. Eyelids. Need I say more? Check bmezine for inspiration
23. Jackie - September 27th, 2007 at 7:00 am
Hemicorporectomies (#2) sounds like torture! It must be a pain in the non-existent ass to pee and poo after…
ETS seems to me a very drastic measure to get rid of a fairly insignificant problem.
And vaginectomy just sounds terribly painful - and I’m sure men would be horrified by the male equivalent.
Now I’m just grateful that I’m healthy. Great list as usual!
24. jfrater - September 27th, 2007 at 7:10 am
Jackie: The list certainly made me appreciate my health too! I wanted to be a doctor as a young man but now that I can see the things they have to do - I just couldn’t cope!
25. wowzer - September 27th, 2007 at 7:20 am
I’ve actually seen a hemecorporectomy patient before. It was kind of sad, and he constantly seemed angry because people kept coming up and either asking what had happened or tried to give him money. Not a pretty picture
26. jfrater - September 27th, 2007 at 11:39 am
wowzer: that sounds awful.
27. alex parker - September 30th, 2007 at 2:36 am
sympathectomies have destroyed lives and caused suicides. it is a surgery also used for mental disorders
28. amanda - October 3rd, 2007 at 2:02 pm
They’ve now found that circumsised men are 63% less likely to contract AIDS. http://news.nationalgeographic.....ision.html
29. al parker - October 3rd, 2007 at 5:22 pm
circumcision has also been listed as helping to reduce cervical cancer in women . (cited years ago in JAMA)
30. zombiejorge - October 20th, 2007 at 9:36 am
heres another one that i felt was on the same level as these listed.
wikipedia says:
Trepanation (also known as trepanning, trephination, trephining or burr hole) is a form of surgery in which a hole is drilled or scraped into the skull, thus exposing the dura mater in order to treat health problems related to intracranial diseases, though in the modern era it is used only to treat epidural and subdural hematomas, as an extreme body modification, and for surgical access for certain other neurosurgical procedures, such as intracranial pressure monitoring.
The strangest part is that a few people still continue this practice believing there are numerous medical benifits, or a sense of added spiritual awareness. However since no sane doctor would administer such a practice they do it to themselves.
31. jfrater - October 20th, 2007 at 10:26 am
Zombiejorge: It is still a standard practice for some problems - but you are totally right about the bizarre aspect which is people doing it to themselves. I think the common tool used is a power drill. Yum.
32. MammieJaye - November 10th, 2007 at 11:16 am
Personally, most guys I know are too lazy to clean anything on their body thoroughly. I’ve only come in contact with one uncircumcised guy in my life sexually, and that put me off oral sex for sooooo long, the nastiness hiding below there.
If I have sons, I’ll likely have it done, at birth with local anethesia. For the sake of the fact that I have no clue how to properly clean them (and that’s just a wee bit important in the first few years before they learn to clean themselves), and for their future girl(boy)friends’ sake.
33. dofnup - November 13th, 2007 at 1:20 pm
Ah, yes, let’s mutilate our sons’ genitals so that we don’t have to go through the trouble of learning how to clean them.
You know, I’ve met guys who don’t clean their ears properly, either … maybe we should cut parts of their ears off, too?
Sorry for the sarcasm, but it bugs me when people use “inconvenience” to justify circumcision.
Oh, and I love this list and the entire listverse site ^_^
34. jfrater - November 13th, 2007 at 1:25 pm
dofnup: Thanks
I am glad you like it - there are 315 lists and more every day 
35. SortaListless - November 18th, 2007 at 8:35 pm
Okie dokie, about the photo of the penectomy. Am I seeing an Aladdin’s lamp tattoo? As in, I want one of my wishes to be that this annoying penis disappears?
Lobotomies. I believe I heard that current lobotomies do not have to be surgical; they can be chemical? (Kind of like castrations.) According to the NPR story about Eunice Kennedy Shriver’s work with Special Olympics, Rosemary was born with mild mental retardation, and the lobotomy was meant to help her. I am horrified.
Citation: http://www.npr.org/templates/s.....Id=9136962
36. Dre - November 25th, 2007 at 4:49 am
First off: great site, just found it this morning, and having a great time reading the list and comments!
Now, on topic:
Quote dofnup [Ah, yes, let’s mutilate our sons’ genitals…]
I think you are putting it a bit strong here. After all, it is just a little flap of skin that is removed. Nothing at all like female circumcision, where the entire clitoris is removed. I’ve been circumcised at very young age, because the opening was so small I was peeing in every direction but forward. I don’t remember having a foreskin, never missed it, or felt less of a man for not having it.
37. jfrater - November 25th, 2007 at 5:05 am
Dre - welcome to the site!
38. roxy - November 27th, 2007 at 8:53 am
oh-what a great list!
about circumcision:
circumcision become common first in desert dwelling nomadic socities.
1.) not much h2o is in the desert to clean yourself with. men produce a secretion, smegma, that coats the glans and keeps things moist & happy down there. in a desert, the build-up of sweat, sand, and smegma could lead to crippling penile infections. so circumcision would prevent this from being so severe, although an circumsized penis can still get infected from uncleanliness and bacteria. (it still produces smegma)
2.) circumcision is a way for the men of one family, or clan, to be “connected” to one another in a unique bond. it’s a form of tribal solidarity.
3.) many cultures use circumsion as a right of passage-young boys, aged 3 to 9, get circumcised in elaborate ceremonies. it is brutal, cruel, and a pact is formed in blood and pain to family.
now, most americans have access to water, soap, and are not running around in long clothes in a desert getting sand in their underwear…it’s a barbaric, out-dated practice with no real need in today’s world.
now, to the women who say “it’s for my baby’s cleanliness”, i say let’s think of our own anatomy. you don’t see doctors hacking away at newborn baby girls’ labias in an effort to reduce future yeast infections, vaginitis, and uncleanliness, now do you? yet it’s all just “extra skin” right? WRONG! all of that skin (whether labia or foreskin) evolved to PROTECT our genitalia. yeash. this topic always gets me fired up. i hate socity justifying mutilation in any form.
check out this site…
http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/
39. happy i’m nipped - December 14th, 2007 at 4:56 pm
have to agree with dre about it not being at all like female genitalia mutilation.normal practice is for it to be done within a few days after birth.I had mine at a couple days old and dont remember a thing.I know a middle aged guy had to have his done and he remembers it vividly.It is so common now-a-days the uncircumcised penis is the oddity.be back later,I need to call mom and tell her thanx for getting me circumcised as a new born
40. suzi - December 29th, 2007 at 2:43 am
There are many good points made both for and against circumcision. However, my stepfather was not circumcised, but as an adult developed an extremely painful complication which required getting it done. After that, he urged every pregnant woman he met to make sure and circumcise if they had a boy. I guess what he went through was horrific.
Now, comparing male circumcision to Female Genital Mutilation is just ridiculous. Not even close.
41. Abby - January 20th, 2008 at 8:37 pm
How is it ridiculous to compare cutting off fully functioning genitalia from a male infant vs. a helpless female? An infant can not defend himself any more than a girl tied down to a bed during fgm could.
When men grow up and have complications they make a fully informed and elective choice to have a beneficial surgery to correct a PROBLEM. The vast majority of the world does not practice infant circumcision, and a large majority of those men do not suffer complications at all. There is no way of knowing which minority of children will grow up and experience problems with their foreskin. We do not cut off all female infants’ tiny boob tissue for the off chance that they may develop breast cancer. Nor do we cut one of everyone’s kidneys because two just aren’t necessary…
42. Csimmons - January 21st, 2008 at 12:06 pm
Im not sure what man in his right mind would want a penectomy. If i ever lost my johnson, id probably kill myself.
43. sevenlies - January 28th, 2008 at 9:19 am
i’m going to be annoying and point out that you can’t see the cingulate gyrus in the image for #3, but i strongly doubt anyone cares.
44. alexandra - January 28th, 2008 at 11:08 am
a friend of mine is 23 and had to have a circumcision because his foreskin was too tight. he couldn’t have sex and was unable to ever have kids without this OP
45. cryndigo - January 30th, 2008 at 1:49 pm
How funny that circumcision made the list.
46. Cor - January 30th, 2008 at 2:27 pm
sevenlies: Actually I did look up the cingulate gyrus http://www.cnsforum.com/conten.....rg_OCD.png
47. satori - February 1st, 2008 at 3:14 am
In #7 you mention “Some men have undergone penectomies as a voluntary body modification, but professional opinion is divided as to whether or not the desire for penile amputation is a pathology, thus including it as part of a body dysmorphic disorder.”
It is NOT in fact Body dismorphic disorder-rather a seperate disorder wherein a person feels the desire or need to have a perfectly healthy body part amputated. It’s called “Body Integrity Identity Disorder”. You can find more info here
http://www.biid.org/
48. Bananas - February 14th, 2008 at 3:25 pm
my only comment is….. yuck.
49. benb - April 14th, 2008 at 10:08 am
is it possible to have a surgical vagina created while still keeping a functional penis so as to become hermaphodite
50. gemeany - May 13th, 2008 at 1:26 am
What is it called when someone wants to remove normal healthy genital or other body parts from a child?like an adult circumcising a boy or girl,doctor or parent ETC?
51. Paul B. - May 13th, 2008 at 6:13 am
Alexandra’s post - as well as the others by or about various mothers whose child “had to be” circumcised because of “infections” - illustrate only too well just how the degree of ignorance in society fosters the practice of circumcision.
The description of a “foreskin was too tight … he couldn’t have sex and was unable to ever have kids” is pitiful - to think that a doctor would either tell someone this, or fail to tell them that it was nonsense. Or worse, to profit by it by offering an unnecessary operation.
If a foreskin is too tight, you simply stretch it. Takes a little time to do but - why are people so desperate not to actually do something for themselves? In general, in the time that it would take to recover from a circumcision (at least a month), stretching will achieve substantial if not complete resolution of the problem. If stretching by hand does not do it, then a device such as the “GFS” can be purchased.
But the very suggestion that a non-retractile foreskin prevents intercourse is absurd, because the owner already *knows* that he can masturbate (in fact, with great ease), and if urine can come out, so can and does semen, so there is no restriction to fatherhood.
While foreskin problems in adults are almost always diagnostic of (uncontrolled) diabetes, a child with a foreskin problem is indicative of the stupidity of the mother (or parents in general) - either attempting to retract the foreskin before it is ready (which may not be until puberty) and/ or irritating it with soap (or dishwashing detergent = “bubble bath”). Dispense with the soap, cease the interference and virtually all of the problems vanish.
A parent with *genuine* concern for their child would be concerned to find out *why* such a problem occurred, and remedy the problem. Such problems are of course more common in girls - but (at least in the last 40 years or so) we do not hear the same “solution” proposed.
52. mommaof3 - May 13th, 2008 at 6:39 pm
to gemeany! it’s called CHILD ABUSE!
53. NTV - May 13th, 2008 at 6:53 pm
Foreskin restoration is *not* bizarre. Why isn’t stretching the holes in your ears with ever-growing larger gauge tube earrings or forking your tongue or implanting those metal spikes in your scalp as a mohawk not included if foreskin restoration is?
54. asunlitrose - May 13th, 2008 at 7:15 pm
I don’t really get how foreskin restoration is considered bizarre. You’re restoring a part of your body that has been cut off against your will…I compare it to breast reconstruction surgery, although mastectomies are done to save lives and are not a cosmetic procedure.
Foreskin is more than just a “flap of skin.” It is the most sensitive part of the penis. It is filled with nerve endings called stretch receptors that fire when they are stretched, rolled, or massaged, making sex more pleasurable. A study done in 2007 (http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06685.x ) found that circumcision removes the most sensitive part of a man’s penis. Sorrells and others enlisted 159 men from the San Francisco Bay area, 91 of them circumcised, and conducted touch-sensitivity tests, using instruments that press with calibrated hairs, on 11 or 17 different places on their penises. The men could not see where they were being touched.
Removing the foreskin would be exactly like removing the hood of the clitoris. Clitoral stimulation is possible by moving the hood, and this is what happens with stimulation of the intact penis. Would the pro-circers here be willing to remove their daughters’ clitoral hood to decrease the build-up of smegma?
55. jfrater - May 14th, 2008 at 12:07 am
NTV: Those things are bizarre too - that doesn’t mean that foreskin restoration is not - it just means that it is one of a group of bizarre things and it is that one I picked for the list.
56. Corey Carrier - May 14th, 2008 at 12:58 am
I think you might find this interesting and even amusing. It’s a list of “reasons” medical “experts” used to justify circumcision throughout history.
http://www.icgi.org/medicalization/#Page_1
I think circumcision to “cure” club foot or stopping Black men from rape has *got* to be one of the most off the wall things I’ve ever heard! Hindsight is 20/20.
57. Paul B. - May 14th, 2008 at 5:06 am
jfrater; I take your point - your inclusion of any particular procedure in this list does not *of itself* imply that it is necessarily either good or bad, and indeed many of the things you mention are “last ditch” medical resorts to otherwise fatal conditions, which are thus *necessary*.
What really is disturbing, is that some procedures which may be beneficial in a very small number of cases have been practiced far more widely for less than ethical and indeed, frankly evil purposes. Various versions of lobotomy have in the past fallen into this category and “One flew over the cuckoo’s nest” is in that respect far too close to the truth for comfort.
Circumcision is an even more blatant example - there are nowadays very few genuine medical indications for it, and all the “prophylactic” arguments for it are clearly bogus. Along with removal of the clitoris, it was introduced into “western” medicine to deliberately suppress sexual function (notably, but not exclusively, masturbation) so historically, both male and female genital mutilations are indeed, equivalent.
The *need* to achieve “restoration” of the foreskin is then, a direct consequence of this practice; really nothing more than an extension of it. It is bizarre *only* because circumcision is. Surgical techniques are by and large, quite unsatisfactory as the cause further injury and cannot improve sensation, but the “non-surgical” method of tissue expansion by persistent traction is rather elegant as it *retains* sensation.
The Lindbergh Operation is an interesting example; its rationale is essentially “because we can”. Robotic surgical assistants might put me out of a job, but I figure it’s a safe bet that I’ll be retiring first.
58. Mark - June 1st, 2008 at 2:14 pm
Penectomy and Vaginectomy were the weirdest. That guy with no wiener was freaky. How does he go pee-pee :O!? What’s so weird about circumcision? It’s good for you.
59. rushfan - June 12th, 2008 at 8:20 am
I saw a show once about limb lengthening procedures people in shorter-statured nations in Asia have done. Holy crap, unnecessary as well as painful.
60. NTVNAT - June 12th, 2008 at 2:30 pm
I think Chinese foot binding (via long, strips of fabric) and African neck lengthening (via gold bangles) while not surgical, is a freaky body-altering practice. It’s also dangerous.
61. jfrater - June 12th, 2008 at 2:37 pm
NTVNAT: food binding is on another list here
62. Melissa - June 27th, 2008 at 11:29 pm
I think there are plenty of horrible medicalprocedures for women… I cannotbelieve that people think the circumcision is so relevant. Women go through plastic surgery that sometimes their husbands pay for as soon asthey give birth. That is awful! Havin a metal T in your uterus because your husband does not want to wear a condom..that is awful! Female labia mutilation..how come it was not in the list? Histerectomy as opposed to vasecotmy, which is a lot simpler, that is awful! Birth control has many side effects on women, but if condoms had those effects on men, they would have been banned long timeago….I am sorry I kept talking,but I had to say it
63. desrtmushroom - July 2nd, 2008 at 5:35 am
Iam circumcised at the age of 7 and happy with that. For Some of my friends those who are not circumcised, the first time sex was painful due to the foreskin. It is very hygenic if you are circumcised and I have never felt that I have any disadvantage with the cut foreskin. It is also great for oral sex.