Top 10 Scientific Frauds and Hoaxes
Published on April 9, 2008 - 93 Comments
A lot of fame and money can be made by scientists who make amazing or unique discoveries, and while this generally provides a motivation for good research, it is occasionally abused. This is a list of 10 cases of scientific fraud that fooled many people. Perhaps this can serve as a reminder that some scientific “discoveries” need be taken with a grain of globally warmed salt.
Jan Henrik Schön (pictured on the left), a researcher at Bell Laboratories in New Jersey, had five papers published in Nature and seven in the journal Science between 1998 and 2001, dealing with advanced aspects of electronics. The discoveries were abstruse, but he was seen by many of his peers as a rising star.
In 2002, a committee found that he had made up his results on at least 16 occasions, resulting in the public embarrassment of his colleagues, his employer, and the editorial staffs of both the journals that accepted his results.
Schön, who by then was still only 32, said: “I have to admit that I made various mistakes in my scientific work, which I deeply regret.” Nature also reported him as adding in a statement, “I truly believe that the reported scientific effects are real, exciting and worth working for.” He would say no more.
The Cardiff Giant is one of the most famous hoaxes in American history. It was a 3 meter (10 foot) petrified body of a man. It was discovered in 1869 by a team of workers digging a well behind the home of William Newell in Cardiff, New York. As it turns out, the giant was the creation of a New Yorker named George Hull, an atheist, who decided to create the giant as a joke on fundamentalist minister Mr Turk who believed that the Bible told of literal giants who roamed the earth.
The giant became so popular that P T Barnum offered $60,000 for a 3 month lease of it. He was turned down so he had a replica made which he put on display. When his replica became more popular than the original, the owner of the “authentic” fake tried to sue Barnum. The judge threw the lawsuit out stating that unless the original could be proven to be real, there was nothing wrong with Barnum producing his own fake.

Cars that run on water and fusion machines that generate more energy than they use are staples of inventors’ fantasy. They pop up all the time. Charles Redheffer raised large sums of money in Philadelphia with a perpetual motion machine and then took it to New York in 1813, where hundreds paid a dollar each to see it.
It did, indeed, seem to keep itself turning. In the end, skeptics offered a large sum of money to “prove” that the machine was in fact a fraud. Redheffer took the money and the skeptics removed some wooden strips along the wall from the machine. When they did so, they found a cat-gut belt drive, which went through a wall to an attic where an old man was turning a crank with one hand, and eating a loaf of bread with the other.
In 1726, Johann Beringer of Würzburg published details of fossils found outside the Bavarian town. These included “lizards in their skin, birds with beaks and eyes, spiders with their webs, and frogs copulating.” Other stones he found bore the Hebrew letters YHVH, for Jehovah, or God. He believed them to be natural products of the “plastic power” of the inorganic world, and said so in a book.
In fact, they had been planted fraudulently by spiteful colleagues. The legend is that Beringer impoverished himself trying to buy back all copies of his book, and the finds became known as lügensteine, or “lying stones”. The colleagues who perpetrated the hoax lost their jobs and reputations over the scandal.
In 1971, a Philippine government minister (Manuel Elizalde) discovered a small stone age tribe living in isolation on the island of Mindanao. This tribe, called the Tasaday, spoke a strong language, used stone tools, and exhibited other stone-age attributes. Their discovery made television headlines, the cover of National Geographic, and was the subject of a bestselling book. When anthropologists tried to get a better look at the tribe, President Marcos declared the land a reserve and made it off-limits to all visitors.
When Marcos was deposed in 1986, two journalists visited the site and found that the Tasaday in fact lived in houses, traded with the local farmers, wore jeans and t-shirts and spoke a modern local dialect. The Tasadays explained that they had moved in the caves and behaved in a stone-age manner because of pressure from Elizalde. Elizalde had fled the country in 1983 with millions of dollars he had stolen from a foundation set up to protect the Tasaday people.
Shinichi Fujimura was one of Japan’s leading archaeologists - despite being self-taught. In 1981 he made his first discovery of stoneware that dated back 40,000 years. It was the oldest stoneware ever found in Japan and this discovery launched his career. During the following years he discovered older and older artifacts that pushed the limits of Japan’s known pre-history.
On October, 2000, Fujimara discovered a cluster of stone pieces that they believed to have been made by primitive people; they also found several holes that they claimed were to hold supports for primitive dwellings. The find was believed to be over 600,000 years old - making the oldest signs of human habitation in the world. This lead to international coverage.
Then, on November 5, the Mainichi Shimbun newspaper published three photos on the front page, which showed Fujimara digging holes at the site and burying the artifacts that he later dug up (see image above). At a press conference that day he admitted that he had planted the stones and had faked most of his discoveries. With his head bowed in shame, he said: “I was tempted by the Devil.”
In August, 1835, a series of articles appeared on the front page of the New York Sun. The articles listed a series of incredible astronomical breakthroughs that the British Astronomer, Sir John Herschel, had made using a unique large telescope and special methods. The article said that Herschel had developed a “new theory of cometary phenomena”; he had discovered planets in other star systems; and he had “solved or corrected nearly every leading problem of mathematical astronomy.” The article then mentioned Herschel’s most stunning achievement: he had discovered intelligent life on the moon.
He described vast forests, seas, and lilac-colored pyramids on the surface of the moon. He described herds of bison that wandered the plains and blue unicorns which lived on the hilltops.
The article was, of course, a very elaborate hoax. Herschel had not really observed life on the moon, nor had he accomplished any of the other astronomical breakthroughs credited to him in the article. In fact, it later turned out that Herschel was not even aware of many of the discoveries attributed to him. Despite this, the Sun continued to publish copies of the article before the public realized it was a hoax.
During the 1920s an Austrian scientist named Paul Kammerer designed an experiment to prove that Lamarckian inheritance (the notion that organisms may acquire characteristics and pass them to their offspring) was possible. His experiment involved a species of toad called the Midwife Toad. Most toads mate in water - resulting in scaly black bumps on their hindlimbs which allow them to hold on to each other during mating, but the midwife toad mates on land - and therefore does not have these lumps. Kammerer said that by forcing midwife toads to mate in water, he could prove that they would develop the same bumps.
Kammerer mated a number of generations of toads in a fishtank full of water. Eventually he announced that he had succeeded and he presented a group of midwife toads with black bumps on their hindlimbs.
However, in 1926, Dr G. K. Noble studied the famous toads and discovered that the black bumps were in fact ink that had been injected in to the hind legs of the toads. When the fraud was unveiled in 1926, Kammerer was humiliated. He insisted that he had not injected ink into the toads and suggested that one of his lab assistants might have done it. Kammerer committed suicide a few days later.
The Sokal affair was a hoax by Alan Sokal (a physicist) perpetrated on the postmodern cultural studies journal Social Text (published by Duke University). In 1996, he submitted a paper of nonsense camouflaged in jargon to see if the journal would “publish an article liberally salted with nonsense if (a) it sounded good and (b) it flattered the editors’ ideological preconceptions.”
The paper, “Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity”, was published in “Science Wars” that year. On the day of publication, Sokal announced (in a different paper,) that the article was a hoax. He said that Social Text was “a pastiche of left-wing cant, fawning references, grandiose quotations, and outright nonsense”. Much heated debate followed, especially regarding academic ethics.
Another recent example of this same situation is the 2005 Rooter Paper; this was a paper randomly generated by a computer which was submitted - and consequently approved as legitimate - to a scientific conference.

The Piltdown Man is a famous hoax in which pieces of a skull and jawbone found in 1912 were believed to be the fossilized remains of an early form of human being. The specimen was officially given a latin name (Eoanthropus Dawsoni) after its collector Charles Dawson. In 1953 it was exposed to be a fraud consisting of the jawbone of an orangutan and the skull of a fully developed adult man.
The Piltdown hoax is probably the most famous hoax in history. It has become so well known for two reasons: the attention it brought to the issue of evolution, and the length of time (over 40 years) that it took for anyone to discover it was a fraud.
Sources: The Guardian, Wikipedia, The Museum of Hoaxes
Related ListsTop 20 Amazing Science Facts20 Weird English Words Top 10 Scientific Mnemonics Top 15 Misconceptions about Evolution |
SubscriptionsLike this article? Subscribe to the RSS feed to keep 'em coming, or subscribe via email: |
If you find this site helpful, please leave a donation so you can enjoy the spirit of giving too.
Email This Post










1. ROYCE - April 9th, 2008 at 7:33 am
CARRRAZY LIIST
2. stevenh - April 9th, 2008 at 7:35 am
Great list - interesting reading
3. Csimmons - April 9th, 2008 at 7:38 am
great list, very interesting, what about scientology? LOL!
4. stevenh - April 9th, 2008 at 7:39 am
Jamie -
Editing error in description of #6…
5. warrrreagl - April 9th, 2008 at 7:45 am
Carl Sagan and The Amazing Randi have both contributed a wealth of imformation towards rooting out these and other sicentific hoaxes. The main problme is that scientists are easy to fool because they assume their subjects are playing fairly and are not trained to spot deception.
6. fishing4monkeys - April 9th, 2008 at 7:47 am
Great list! I knew what #1 would be even before I clicked on it. It’s crazy what some people will do…
7. fishing4monkeys - April 9th, 2008 at 7:48 am
Yeah and like stevenh said there is an error in #6
8. jfrater - April 9th, 2008 at 7:50 am
thanks stevenh: I have fixed the error
9. SoCalJeff - April 9th, 2008 at 7:52 am
Are we ready to dismiss this whole earth is round thing yet? If so that’s should be up on top of the list.
10. dangorironhide - April 9th, 2008 at 8:13 am
SoCalJeff: Wait, the earth is round??? All these years people have been telling me the earth is banana shaped… They were lying! I can’t beleive it…
Oh, and nice list
11. JT - April 9th, 2008 at 8:15 am
This list makes me sad at what some people will do for attention and fame.
Reminds me of those stones that featured people hunting dinosaurs or that guy who claime to have found Noah’s Ark in Turkey.
12. hippymom - April 9th, 2008 at 8:17 am
wow! great list!!!
13. Joss - April 9th, 2008 at 8:22 am
#2 and #8 are awesome!
14. Mom424 - April 9th, 2008 at 8:26 am
Excellent list Jamie. I’m kind of surprised the cold fusion debacle didn’t make the list, mind you I’ve seen more than one instance of mistake/fraud pertaining to it and it’s unlimited energy potential. Do a whole list on it just about.
By the way, I learned a new word today. I have a veritable treasure-trove of words at my disposal and still you stumped me. Abstruse = complicated, difficult to comprehend.
Good Job!
15. szcastle - April 9th, 2008 at 8:33 am
What about man made global warming? That is a huge one designed to make 1 ex vice president very wealthy.
16. SlickWilly - April 9th, 2008 at 8:37 am
I’m kind of disappointed not to see Hwang Woo-Suk and the Korean stem cell fraud not on here. In 2005, Hwang Woo-Suk claimed, among other things, that he had successfully cloned a human embryo and extracted viable stem cells from it, and also that he had successfully created 11 different lines of stem cells genetically tailored to 11 different patients (of course raising hope about stem cells’ viability in curing alzheimers and a variety of other disorders). It was found that he had fabricated almost all of his results to acquire government funding. He was denounced and removed from his position at the university. Since then, Hwang’s whereabouts have been unknown.
17. troyfamu - April 9th, 2008 at 8:38 am
Great list. All of these hoaxes served a greater purpose though: they kept others honest in their “discoveries”. Also, be wary of a discovery that only one or two persons were present to see.
18. TheAwesome - April 9th, 2008 at 8:59 am
Just some grammar Nazism: In #4…there’s only one solar system in the universe. This is the Solar system because our star is called “Sol.” Anything else is just a star system.
19. Metalwrath - April 9th, 2008 at 9:15 am
I can’t believe some scientists would actually do that kind of shit just for fame.. its not like we wouldn’t end up realising they were wrong or frauded…
As for that japanese archaeologist, as a student in archaeology myself I find it totally “repulsive”(?) that he should lie on historical findings… especially that if it weren’t discovered as a fraud we might be learning that shit in history books and for objects that old it would be normal to never find other proofs because they are so rare… so his fraud could have passed.
Good list.
20. GForce - April 9th, 2008 at 9:20 am
Im from the US but live in Korea teaching English. On some of our textbooks we have prominent figures in history like MLK, Mother Teresa, Gandhi, JKF and other prolific people. On a few older books, Hwang Woo-suk is shown in his lab. Of course he was disgraced with his cloning hoax that his picture was replaced by Edison. Just interesting to see what a national hero he was and how fast he fell from grace. Koreans are so desperate to be recognized on an international stage, they idolize anyone who makes it big, like the Superbowl MVP a few years back. Last I hear, Hwang has set up shop in Thailand where he can get plenty of embyros with no questions asked.
21. srichards - April 9th, 2008 at 9:28 am
is the black hole theory also fake?
22. SlickWilly - April 9th, 2008 at 9:38 am
srichards: Are you talking about black holes in general, or a specific theory?
TheAwesome: If you’re a grammar nazi, does that make Jfrater a grammar jew?
Oh man, that was bad.
23. Joss - April 9th, 2008 at 9:42 am
@#22 - Wow. That is funny and horrible.
24. otay - April 9th, 2008 at 9:59 am
Great list Jamie, infomative and entertaining. Reminds me of the saying “if you cant dazzle them with brilliance, then baffle them with bullshit”!
25. Kreachure - April 9th, 2008 at 10:07 am
Nice list. Several I hadn’t heard of.
But indeed I feel Hwang Woo-Suk’s cloning circus is missing here too.
26. Randall - April 9th, 2008 at 10:09 am
GForce:
You know what you should tell your Korean students and friends? To not worry about the “big name” heroes–because they have countless “little” heroes working all over the world in the sciences–doing great things in research. I work at a major university where the sciences are hugely important…. we have a great number of Korean graduate students and postdocs doing really important work—and we’re only one major, prestigious university, amongst a few others of similar standing in the US, and dozens of slightly lower rank (where, nevertheless, some great work is done). I know a few excellent students from Korea, and they’re a highly intelligent, skilled and personable bunch.
They should all be very proud, and so should your students. I’ve heard colleagues say that their Korean students are some of their best and brightest. They’ll go places… and it’s only a matter of time before one of them, at least, *does* make a big name for himself or herself.
27. Randall - April 9th, 2008 at 10:13 am
The Cardiff Giant, by the way, is on display in Cooperstown, NY as part of the Farmer’s Museum there.
28. CK - April 9th, 2008 at 10:15 am
Fascinating list. Another fraud that could have been put on this list (at least, I think it was a fraud), is brontosaurus.
Brontosaurus was my favorite dinosaur growing up so I was very sad to learn that it did not actually exist. I’m not exactly sure if it was meant to be a fraud or if it was just a scientific mix-up though.
29. troyfamu - April 9th, 2008 at 10:17 am
Wasn’t there a hoax many years ago about Long Island sinking and someone tricked alot of people into thinking that the city was going to cut it off and turn it around? Maybe I’m mistaken. Anyone…?
30. Randall - April 9th, 2008 at 10:24 am
CK:
That’s a mix-up, not a hoax, due to the mistake made by a prominent paleontologist. And really, something of scientific nit-picking, in regards to the name.
Othniel Marsh discovered and named Apatosaurus in the late 19th century. Some short time after another was found that he mistakenly identified as a separate species—Brontosaurus. The skeleton was mounted–but with the wrong head, as I recall… further fueling the belief that this *was* a legitimately separate animal. But it wasn’t… a while back the mistake was discovered… and paleontology voted to with the *original* name… and consign Bronto to the scrap heap.
Same short shaft that Pluto got, if you ask me.
31. CK - April 9th, 2008 at 10:32 am
Randall - Thanks for clearing that up! And about Pluto, that still weirds me out, my junior high solar system project would be considered all wrong now! =)
32. Miss Destiny - April 9th, 2008 at 10:36 am
Very interesting! I’d never heard of any of these before I read this. Thanks for my daily edumacation!
33. goof_ball - April 9th, 2008 at 10:37 am
ur moms a hoax!
34. otay - April 9th, 2008 at 10:39 am
I wonder how many people i could fool if went deep into some cave and painted some crude pictures of “cavemen” hunting a wooly mammoth with AK-47s or M-16s……
35. Csimmons - April 9th, 2008 at 10:43 am
otay: You’d fool just about every dumbass who believed these stories.
36. miller - April 9th, 2008 at 10:48 am
soon to come…. grammer concentration camps….
37. RobS - April 9th, 2008 at 10:52 am
Take a look at the Piltdown skull. His tooth is “twinkly”.
Which just goes to show that even fake cave men brush regularly.
38. SlickWilly - April 9th, 2008 at 11:02 am
“Anne Frank’s Diary of Grammar and Vocabulary.” Anyone? Anyone?
Grammar showers? Grammar ovens? Nah, that’s tasteless. And uninspired.
39. Csimmons - April 9th, 2008 at 11:08 am
slick: That’d make a funny parody though, well to those who aren’t jewish at least.
40. otay - April 9th, 2008 at 11:09 am
Grammar crackers are pretty tasty with butter or peanut butter on them.
Wait…..maybe its graham crackers…..whatever!
41. jestr - April 9th, 2008 at 11:19 am
Is anyone familiar with facilitated communication? I think that it is a huge omission from the list.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F.....munication
42. NeoLudd - April 9th, 2008 at 11:24 am
The famous “Doctor’s Photo” of Nessie.
43. SlickWilly - April 9th, 2008 at 11:28 am
NeoLudd: I think you missed the point of this list…
44. Csimmons - April 9th, 2008 at 11:31 am
neoludd: That was a more of a “look at this wackjobs” hoax.
45. Poopy Pants - April 9th, 2008 at 11:38 am
Feces. Superb!
46. DiscHuker - April 9th, 2008 at 11:40 am
jestr: i have studied FC a little bit, sparked mostly by a law and order episode. very interesting stuff with the mixture of emotion, hope and fraud.
47. SlickWilly - April 9th, 2008 at 11:44 am
jestr: I think the negative components of facilitated communication were unintentional leading cues by the researchers. It was proven false due to uncontrolled researcher error that affected the outcome, not because someone was consciously manipulating the results (at least, not that I know of), so I don’t think it would qualify as a fraud or a hoax.
48. Blogball - April 9th, 2008 at 11:50 am
Interesting & fun list to read.
I remember hearing about this a while back.
Thought it kind of fit in with the other stuff on this list.
http://blog.wired.com/tableofm.....skele.html
49. Csimmons - April 9th, 2008 at 11:54 am
Blogball: That would have been a good addition to this list.
50. copperdragon - April 9th, 2008 at 12:52 pm
I’m surprised PT Barnum himself isn’t on the list.
He created several scientific hoaxes, all in the name of turning a profit.
“This way to the egress! Come see the great egress!”
egress = exit
51. StinkyTheCat - April 9th, 2008 at 1:16 pm
cough cough. what? no scientology? come on. we all know that’s the biggest fake-ass hoax on the planet. or should i say universe?
52. Schiesl - April 9th, 2008 at 1:17 pm
What about the Alien Autopsy of the Roswell UFO crash video. That was a great hoax
53. Schiesl - April 9th, 2008 at 1:24 pm
or what about the case of “Cold Fusion” that still has merit today, but most ppl believe was a completely false claim by Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann
54. Kelsi - April 9th, 2008 at 1:58 pm
I’m a little bit confused by number 10. What were his claims? Too complicated for us little people to understand?
And I totally love number 2, being a college student who is forced to read vast amounts of bullshit academia type books and papers. Why can’t people just say what they need to say without sticking their heads up their asses about it?
55. rangerjoe8999 - April 9th, 2008 at 2:21 pm
Anthropogenic global warming should be number one. Other than that, great list.
56. SlickWilly - April 9th, 2008 at 2:43 pm
Kelsi: Oh man, Kelsi, I think that all the time (about academia). My goal as an academic is to write my thesis as clearly, succinctly, and simply as possible. I hate the constant use of jargon and the whole elitist mentality that shines through in those papers. I feel that everything I write should (within reason) be easily understood by the layman. (We are all laymen when it comes to most subjects.)
rangerjoe: There is no clear evidence that shows that humans have not exaccerbated global warming. Most of the evidence available suggests that we have.
57. Dana - April 9th, 2008 at 3:05 pm
Fascinating list. I remember my dad bringing home a stack of National Geographics one time - probably the early 80s - and Tasaday tribe was in one. I found them absolutely absorbing.
58. Csimmons - April 9th, 2008 at 3:26 pm
Scientology isn’t on here because why? I mean that’s the biggest pile of horse shit I’ve ever heard. I mean the whole thing is a cult.
59. StinkyTheCat - April 9th, 2008 at 3:31 pm
hey. someone agrees with me!
60. SlickWilly - April 9th, 2008 at 3:32 pm
Csimmons: Yes we know. But I think the important thing here is that the fraud was taken *seriously* by the established academic community, and was hailed by their contemporaries as a major scientific discovery/break-through. Scientology was never taken seriously by anyone with a brain. Or a *good* brain, anyway.
61. Csimmons - April 9th, 2008 at 3:58 pm
slick: Good point, And it does sound like crap to everyone except Tom “Xenu’s Bitch” Cruise anyway.
62. jfrater - April 9th, 2008 at 4:02 pm
Csimmons: hahah I can’t believe you remembered that reference!
63. Matt - April 9th, 2008 at 4:02 pm
Great list!
And to those people who say that man-made global warning should be on here - get your head out of the sand!
The overwhelming majority of climate change scientists agree that “most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-twentieth century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations”.
64. Csimmons - April 9th, 2008 at 4:12 pm
jfrater: I still remember that because it’s so true
Matt: In english please
65. seeker - April 9th, 2008 at 4:17 pm
Check out the similar list of scientific frauds at Neatorama. It includes some important ones missing from this list including:
- Bernard Kettlewell and the natural selection of peppered moths in Britain - all fabricated, down to the famous photographs
- Alfred Kinsey’s estimates on the extent of homosexual behavior (38.7%, based on his interviews of prisoners and pedophiles, doesn’t match the current better data of 3-5%) were so fraught with bad scientific method, they bordered on fraud, if they were not outright fraud.
- The banning of DDT (PDF) - not only was it much less dangerous than opponents claimed, the ban actually cost thousands of lives lost to malaria
- “Lucy” the supposed humanoid turns out to NOT be human, and NOT an ancestor of ours, i.e. Lucy’ isn’t the ‘Missing Link
Of course, as a creationist sympathizer, I think that we will find out that *evolution* (descent with modification and natural selection) will turn out to be THE greatest scientific hoax ever perpetrated, and it’s influence on world despots like Hitler and later eugenics movements will make it doubly damnable.
66. Mom424 - April 9th, 2008 at 4:46 pm
Slick; I’m with you on the global warming thing. Sure the planet has cyclical temperature changes, but I have read nothing that says we are not responsible for the speed of change. Not entirely true; I have read a few things that try to negate the human factor, right-wing dish rags mostly. I have also read left-wing fairy tales (the kind where the wolf gets fat and red riding hood is dinner)that predict destruction as a result of it. I believe the truth to be somewhere in the middle. Unless of course the oceans warm up enough to release all that methane into our atmosphere - then all bets are off.
Anecdotally, we haven’t had a real winter in years. It does not get cold enough in winter, and when it does get even close it does not stay. We had maybe 14 days or so of -15°C (just over 0°F)in total. Spread out over the entire winter. Only a couple of days of -25/-30°(-20F). Used to be, and not that long ago, most of January and all of February were that cold. Spring has pretty much disappeared, you move directly into heat wave season. July weather from end of April ’til Mid-September. Generally arid weather punctuated with too much wind, and way more Thunderstorms and tornadoes. Geez we even get quite a few t-storms in winter. It used to be rare.
We have a feast or famine type of climate now.
And I haven’t lived all that long. Puny length of time in climatic circles.
67. Matt - April 9th, 2008 at 4:58 pm
Haha…well yeah that was a pretty verbose statement that I grabbed off the wiki on global warming and can be attributed to an IPCC report on climate change. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming
And sorry mate if don’t know what some of the big words mean look them up in a dictionary…it’ll do you some good
68. Karen - April 9th, 2008 at 6:18 pm
very interesting!
69. Csimmons - April 9th, 2008 at 6:34 pm
Matt: Oh, well F*** YOU! Just kiddin’
70. manashiori - April 9th, 2008 at 6:37 pm
#6. Gotta love my country for these type of things. Talk about embarrassing.
Great list nonetheless.
71. Cookie - April 9th, 2008 at 9:36 pm
#7, the poor guy. haha.
72. kiki - April 9th, 2008 at 10:00 pm
elizalde made big money off # 6
73. sue - April 9th, 2008 at 11:33 pm
Very interesting list…..:o)
74. nippy143 - April 10th, 2008 at 12:22 am
nice list…tasadays were really famous.It was even really written in philippine history books, this #6…too bad, i believed it then..
75. rneiderman - April 10th, 2008 at 7:00 am
How about the old Walt Disney nature film with the lemmings committing mass suicide? The filmakers caused them to rush into the water and drown, then claimed that this was natural population control. Years later, it was revealed as a fraud, but the idea of suicidal lemmings has become part of the popular consciousness.
76. BadassBookworm - April 10th, 2008 at 7:01 am
I remember learning in high school about a study on evolutionary adaptation. It involved moths that lived outside of a factory. The scientists discovered that moths exposed to the pollution of the factory changed their colors to match the soot on the tree, while others didn’t. This was a case study and proof that evolution happens even today.
Problem was that it was a hoax. They knew it was a hoax when my science textbook was written. Anyone else hear of this?
77. Barnacle - April 10th, 2008 at 7:52 am
Number 8: Perpetual motion machine.
” …which went through a wall to an attic where an old man was turning a crank with one hand, and eating a loaf of bread with the other.”
A loaf of bread HAR HAR HAR. It sounds like something out of python. I can’t get this image out of my mind.
78. dave4248 - April 10th, 2008 at 8:11 am
What about Pons and Fleischmann? We were all “had” back in 1989 when they claimed to fuse hydrogen at room temperature.
79. Shadow - April 10th, 2008 at 11:05 am
Mom424 - I agree that we may be responsible for the speed of the change. However, this does not mean that we need to destroy entire populations and return to living in caves, something I’ve had people tell me to my face during discussions of certain topics. Of course when asked if they’d be willing to sacrifice, they turned out to love their conveniences far too much to do without them.
To me, Global Warming is a huge fraud, a criminal one too. However, I also have nothing to offer in rebuttal to these ideas, so I’ll stop here.
80. Ghidoran - April 10th, 2008 at 1:16 pm
Two of these (no.9 and no.1) are on anoter article.
81. seeker - April 10th, 2008 at 4:35 pm
bookworm, look at post #65 for your answer on peppered moths
82. Phillies - April 10th, 2008 at 9:31 pm
What about when I was told, all through my childhood, that pandas were more closely related to raccoons than bears. NOW they say that bears are a closer relative. This fraud has destroyed my childhood
83. davo - April 10th, 2008 at 10:15 pm
CK - the brontosaurus was real but had already been discovered and called an Apatosaurus.
84. Crandall P. Chuzy - April 11th, 2008 at 2:59 am
My sister Carleen invented the word “flesticle” in order to confuse the masses. I believe she is a dangerous pantocrater and ought to be restrained.
85. Crandall P. Chuzy - April 11th, 2008 at 3:00 am
By the way, she has an impressive rack. Just so you know.
86. Black-Yami-Cat - April 11th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
Well, what about the Snouters? That entire species list that was on taxonomy lists for years, even had books writen about them. They were a huge scientifical hoax, and pretty hillarious, if you ask me
87. LadyPit - April 12th, 2008 at 1:57 am
One could easily make a list “Top 100 Scientific Frauds”. No wonder the general public is easily deceived - I mean, in a matter such as “advanced electronics”- , but the astonishing thing is how many scientists can be fooled, often for decades, by impostors such as Bruno Bettelheim, the childcare guru of the century, who faked his entire list of credentials, or Professor Burt, the guru of “inherited intelligence”, wo faked most of his experiments with twins, and many others.
88. redskin - April 16th, 2008 at 5:14 am
You forgot Bre-X scandal, Canadian exploration company who claimed to have found 200 millions ounce of gold deposit in Borneo. The company market value rose up to $4.5 billion and its executive made million dollars of capital gain. When the fraud was discovered, the stock was fell 84% in a single day, and finally de-listed from Nasdaq. http://www.btimes.co.za/97/0511/news/news6.htm
89. Randall - April 25th, 2008 at 9:06 am
LadyPit:
Please don’t hit and run here on Bruno Bettelheim. A) there is no evidence he “faked his entire list of credentials.” He embellished them, yes. He never completed his PhD in Vienna, yes. But beyond that, no. Yes, there’s some evidence he also embellished stories from his personal life—his experiences in Europe during WWII for instance. But saying he faked all his credentials is going over the top. He was certainly no “imposter.” Indeed, he was a great theorist in psychology, and most people who knew him or were students under him or were his patients have said he was a compassionate, helpful man. There are stories of him acting tyrannical, but these aren’t well-substantiated and are opposed by at least as many stories that say he was just the opposite. Same goes for his patients.
For “The Uses of Enchantment” alone, Bettelheim should be remembered as a great man.
His theories on autism may be discredited now, but then lots of theories from the old school of psychology have been discredited.
90. Val - May 1st, 2008 at 8:54 pm
The Perpetual Motion Machine is in the news again. It will be interesting to see what develops from this experiment.
A new twist on an old idea - the perpetual motion machine makes a new appearance, and interestingly so!
Its name: Perepiteia
There’s an article from the Toronto Star dated Feb. 04, 2008L http://www.thestar.com/Business/article/300042
As seen on YouTube”
91. Val - May 1st, 2008 at 8:56 pm
Oops - here the link to the YouTube Video about’Perpetia’
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogLeKTlLy5E