Top 10 Worst Engineering Disasters
Published on December 4, 2007 - 81 Comments
Mankind, for all its genius and amazing achievements, is still far from infallible. Buildings still have to be built, and that takes the collective know-how of hundreds of people, and anywhere along this chain of human assistance could easily appear a weakest link. Take the Titanic, for instance, sure they rammed into an iceberg, but had it not been for a design flaw in the ballasts and the hull surrounding them, the impact could have been significantly less devastating. Here are ten more ways humans are far from perfect.
10. Tacoma Washington Bridge Disaster
The Tacoma Narrows Bridge is a pair of mile-long (1600 meter) suspension bridges with main spans of 2800 feet (850 m). The first bridge, nicknamed Galloping Gertie, was opened to traffic on July 1, 1940, and became famous four months later for a dramatic wind-induced structural collapse that was caught on color motion picture film. Surprisingly the only fatality was a black Cocker Spaniel. The first replacement bridge opened in 1950, and a parallel bridge opened in 2007. The video is amazing.
9. Cleveland East Ohio Gas Explosion
This disaster occurred on the afternoon of Friday, October 20, 1944. The resulting gas leak, explosion and fires killed 130 people and destroyed a one square mile area on Cleveland, Ohio’s east side. At 2:30 p.m. on the afternoon of Friday, October 20, 1944, above ground storage tank number 4, holding liquefied natural gas in the East Ohio Gas Company’s tank farm, began to emit a vapor that poured from a seam on the side of the poorly structured tank. As the gas mixture flowed and mixed with air and sewer gas, the mix ignited. In the ensuing explosion, manhole covers launched skyward as jets of fire erupted from depths of the sewer lines. One manhole cover was found several miles east. At first it was thought that the disaster was contained, and spectators returned home thinking that the matter was being taken care of by the fire department. At 3:00 p.m., a second above ground tank exploded, leveling the tank farm.
8. Hyatt Regency Hotel Walkway Collapse
This was a major disaster that occurred on July 17, 1981 in Kansas City, Missouri, killing 114 people and injuring more than 200 others during a tea dance. At the time it was the deadliest structural collapse in U.S. history. On July 17, 1981, approximately 2,000 people had gathered in the atrium to participate in and watch a dance contest. Dozens stood on the walkways. At 7:05 PM, the walkways on the second, third, and fourth floor were packed with visitors as they watched over the active lobby, also full of people. The fourth floor bridge was suspended directly over the second floor bridge, with the third floor walkway set off to the side several meters away from the other two. Construction issues led to a subtle but flawed design change that doubled the load on the connection between the fourth floor walkway support beams and the tie rods carrying the weight of the second floor walkway. This new design could barely handle the weight of the structure itself, much less the weight of the hundreds of spectators standing on it. The connection failed and both walkways crashed onto the lobby, killing 114 people and injuring more than 200 others.
7. Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Disaster
This incident is the worst nuclear power plant accident in history and the only of the level 7 on the International Nuclear Event Scale, resulting in a severe nuclear meltdown. On 26 April 1986 at 01:23:40 a.m. structurally unsound reactor number four at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant located in the Soviet Union near Pripyat in Ukraine exploded. Further explosions and the resulting fire sent a plume of highly radioactive fallout into the atmosphere and over an extensive geographical area. 336,000 had to be relocated.
6. St. Francis Dam Flooding
William Mulholland’s career ended on March 12, 1928, when his St. Francis Dam failed just hours after being inspected by Mulholland himself, and sent 12.5 billion US gallons (47,000,000 m³) of water flooding into the Santa Clarita Valley, north of Los Angeles. A 10-story wall of water rolled down the Santa Clara riverbed at 18-mph (29 km/h) towards the sea at Ventura, and the next morning revealed unbelievable catastrophe. The town of Santa Paula lay buried under 20 feet (6 m) of mud and debris; other parts of Ventura County were covered up to 70 feet (21 m). Disaster recovery crews worked for days, and the final death count has been estimated at 450, including 42 school children.
5. The Vasa
The Vasa was built top-heavy with insufficient ballast and foundered and sunk in 32 meters of water just 120 meters from shore as soon as she encountered a wind stronger than a breeze, just a few minutes after first setting sail on her maiden voyage on August, 10th, 1628. Despite clearly lacking stability even in port, she was allowed to set sail. This was caused by a combination of impatience from King Gustavus Adolphus, who was abroad on the date of her maiden voyage, to see her join the Baltic fleet. An inquiry was organized by the Privy Council to find someone responsible for the disaster, but no sentences were handed out. The death toll reached between 35-50 sailors and crew.
4. The Boston Molasses Disaster
At 529 Commercial Street, a huge molasses tank 50 ft (15 m) tall, 90-ft (27 m) in diameter and containing as much as 2,300,000 US gal (8,700,000 L) collapsed. Witnesses stated that as it collapsed there was a loud rumbling sound like a machine gun as the rivets shot out of the tank, and that the ground shook as if a train were passing by. The collapse unleashed an enormous wave of molasses between 8 and 15 ft (2.5 to 4.5 m) high, moving at 35 mph (56 km/h). The molasses wave was of sufficient force to break the girders of the adjacent Boston Elevated Railway’s Atlantic Avenue structure and lift a train off the tracks. Nearby, buildings were swept off their foundations and crushed. 21 were killed along with 150 injured.
3. Skylab
Weighing 75 Metric tons, Skylab was launched 14 May 1973 by a Saturn INT-21 (a two-stage version of the Saturn V launch vehicle) into a 235 nautical mile (435 km) orbit. The launch is sometimes referred to as Skylab 1, or SL-1. Severe damage was sustained during launch, including the loss of the station’s micrometeoroid shield/sun shade and one of its main solar panels. Debris from the lost micrometeoroid shield further complicated matters by pinning the remaining solar panel to the side of the station, preventing its deployment and thus leaving the station with a huge power deficit. The orbiting space station never fully recovered to its initial standards and ultimately the cost reached $3.6 Billion.
2. R101 Airship Disaster
The R101 departed on October 4 at 6:24 p.m. for its intended destination to Karachi via a refueling stop at Ismaïlia in Egypt under the command of Flight Lieutenant Carmichael Irwin. Over France, the R101 encountered gusting winds that tore back the outer covering, exposing and rupturing the first gas bag. The R101 crashed into a hillside near Beauvais, north of Paris, at only 13 mph (20 km/h). The crash ignited the leaking hydrogen and fire quickly engulfed the entire airship. 46 of the 54 passengers and crew were killed. Two men who survived the crash died later in a hospital bringing the total to 48 dead. This particular airship disaster is worse than the ill-fated Hindenburg.
1. 1970’s DC-10 Disasters
In 1979, after a string of numerous malfunctions including door issues, DC-10s (all series) around the world were grounded following the crash of American Airlines Flight 191. Flight 191 lost its number one wing engine after taking off from O’Hare International Airport in Chicago, USA, May 25, 1979. As the engine separated upwards, it ripped through the leading edge of the wing; rupturing hydraulic lines which caused a hydraulic cylinder that locked the port wing slats to fail. As airspeed was reduced per AA emergency climb-out procedures, the slats retracted, the left wing stalled, the plane rolled left and crashed before the flight crew could recover. All 271 people on board, plus two on the ground, were killed in this accident, the worst single plane crash in America.
Related ListsTop 10 Worst Dolls EverTop 10 Worst Scenes In Movies Top 10 Worst Artists in Music Top 10 Deadliest Natural Disasters |
SubscriptionsLike this article? Subscribe to the RSS feed to keep 'em coming, or subscribe via email: |
If you find this site helpful, please leave a donation so you can enjoy the spirit of giving too.
Email This Post










1. evan - December 4th, 2007 at 2:04 pm
you might want to change this to just 10 Engineering Disasters. Or US Disasters…
2. evan - December 4th, 2007 at 2:05 pm
opps forgot about Chernobyl
3. Randall - December 4th, 2007 at 2:20 pm
Should have mentioned… the Vasa was later raised, and now resides in a museum setting…
4. Ozhan - December 4th, 2007 at 2:28 pm
Ah, I forgot all the details. Watched last year or so… A foreign country, a wedding party, dancing people on 2nd floor and it’s collapsed! I dont know how many deaths.
5. mklong - December 4th, 2007 at 2:31 pm
he put in chernobyl. for got the titanic tho.
6. mklong - December 4th, 2007 at 2:32 pm
nvm evan read that wrong. sorry.
7. Gravy - December 4th, 2007 at 2:51 pm
cool
8. Blogball - December 4th, 2007 at 2:51 pm
I’m not saying we are perfect but with all of the strict building codes there are in the US (Most of these on the list are US disasters) there must be engineering disasters in other parts of the world particularly in the 3rd world countries that are much worse.
Here is one that came to mind that was not on the list
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banqiao_Dam
9. Marco - December 4th, 2007 at 3:04 pm
The Vaiont Dam disaster needs an “honourable” mention at very least.
http://www.geocities.com/geogsoc2000/Vaiont1.htm
10. Cat Skyfire - December 4th, 2007 at 3:15 pm
On the Vasa : It says “This was caused by a combination of impatience from King Gustavus Adolphus, who was abroad on the date of her maiden voyage, to see her join the Baltic fleet.”
That’s not a combination, that’s a single item. What else was a factor?
11. dave4248 - December 4th, 2007 at 3:22 pm
I don’t think that the Tacoma Bridge or skylab s/b in this group. Nobody died, so they can’t be considered “worst engineering disasters.” Tacoma s/b replaced by the collapse of the “silver bridge” in Ohio circa 1966. 44 people were killed. Skylab wasn’t as bad as either space shuttle explosion or Apollo 1, which killed about 16 or 17 people between them.
12. Black Lutefisk - December 4th, 2007 at 3:22 pm
Not the New Orleans Levee system? Politics aside, it could have prevented the damage. The Army Core of Engineers insisted it was sound, ignoring the calls of everyone from local musicians to Mr. Bill back in 2004. And it wasn’t that the levees weren’t high enough…they were. But they weren’t able to take the force. It all could have been prevented. Years later, the city is still a disaster area. This should be on the list. http://politicalhumor.about.co.....ricane.htm
13. Nelia - December 4th, 2007 at 3:27 pm
That bridge collapse is crazy to watch. Thank god no people were killed, but i do feel bad about that poor dog though.
14. Angelina - December 4th, 2007 at 3:57 pm
What year did the Molasses disaster happen? Death by syrup. . . sorry.
15. Cat Skyfire - December 4th, 2007 at 4:06 pm
I think the Tacoma bridge qualifies under the ‘engineering disaster’ title. An engineering disaster doesn’t have to claim human life to count. The Tacoma bridge is a prime example of an engineering error that should’ve been avoided. It even gets some bonus points for being a ‘not long after it was completed’ disaster.
16. JMurf - December 4th, 2007 at 4:10 pm
I don’t know about it being classed as an engineering disaster, but what about the Hindenburg?
17. JMurf - December 4th, 2007 at 4:12 pm
Sorry missed the last sentence on #2
18. Kelsi - December 4th, 2007 at 4:18 pm
Yeah, that bridge collapse is really interesting to watch! What a video, wow.
mklong: The titanic wasn’t really an engineering disaster…the ship would have been fine if it hadn’t hit an iceberg. And the people would have survived if it had been properly stocked with lifeboats. That’s more protocol than engineering of the ship itself.
I read a book in elementary school about a boy who loved molassas and he was in Boston during (after?) the expolsion and ate a ton of it. Looking back, it was sort of inappropriate considering how many people died.
19. Tony - December 4th, 2007 at 4:19 pm
WOOP WOOP TACOMA!
20. zubair kaka - December 4th, 2007 at 6:28 pm
what happened to jrafter? is he on holidays? 19 messages no reply…
what abt the millenium bridge in london…no deaths but after plenty of Who-Ha it closed on day 1!
21. CK - December 4th, 2007 at 6:39 pm
I remember my parents telling me about #8. I was born shortly before it happened and we lived in Kansas so they knew it well. For a long time during my childhood my mom would always tell me not to cross on walkways.
22. Martin L - December 4th, 2007 at 7:26 pm
MKLong: Titanic was not really an engineering disaster. It was more like retribution for the hubris of the ship’s builders, operators, and commanding officers. The ship was traveling much too quickly in the North Atlantic in the winter, when icebergs were a known seasonal danger, because the White Star Line was also trying to make the ship break all speed records for the Liverpool to New York run on her maiden voyage, purely for publicity’s sake. In many respects, the ship was one of the best engineered of its time, with a double hull and electrically operated watertight doors, as well as the most up-to-date wireless telegraphy of the day. The most serious flaw that cost the most lives was the insufficient number of lifeboats for the number of people aboard, simply because it was truly believed that “God Himself couldn’t sink this ship.”
Strangely enough, the silent film showing in the ship’s theatre on the night in question was “The Poseidon Adventure.” There was a silent version of that turkey before Irwin Allen made his! (Who knew?)
Anyway, another list to add to the list of tres cool lists on LV!
23. 20Fan20 - December 4th, 2007 at 8:36 pm
I am not sure the N.O. levee system was an engineering disaster (the local and federal governments response sure was.)
The levees were topped. This caused the water on the back side to weaken the soil. This reduced the support on the levee walls causing them to fail. They could not hold the water back in many areas becuase more water fell than they were designed to hold, hence being topped. As far as wanting levees that can hold back a hurricane of that size is easy for a CE to design. The hard part is getting people to pay for it, maintain it and want to live next to giant concrete walls.
24. Punjar - December 4th, 2007 at 8:50 pm
The show Modern Marvels on the History Channel does a show once or twice each season about engineering disasters. They did Engineering Disasters in October, in fact (Though there are more than 21 such episodes, as not all are numbered). I’ve seen most of the items on this list on the show. I think the #8 was on the last one, though it might have just been an old one that was re-run recently.
25. strych9 - December 4th, 2007 at 9:08 pm
I think South Korea’s Sampoong Department Store collapse of 1995 should be here. Textbook case of needless greed and corruption compromising human safety even in this day and age.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.....e_collapse
Can the fact that numerous airplane safety measures throughout airline history could readily be implemented if not for cost-effectiveness be considered an engineering disaster?
26. Black Lutefisk - December 4th, 2007 at 9:20 pm
20 Fan: The failure is in having levees that couldn’t withstand the force against them. What water topped the system was minimal. Truly, it would have been an obnoxious flood…maybe even 7-figure damage. But not the disaster it was. And only because, yes, they built cheap and not for what was necessary. Engineers failed New Orleans. It deserves to be up here.
27. jongleur - December 4th, 2007 at 10:26 pm
I guess if it happens in the Third World, it doesn’t really count. Bhopal certainly qualifies for this list in my mind, poor design compounded with worker inattention or lack of training. Up to 5,000 immediate deaths, and an estimated 20,000 deaths all told as a result of exposure to Methyl isocyanate.
The financial costs of this aren’t insignificant either. Union Carbide got off cheap by it happening in India, the total is probably around $700million. On the other hand, we’ll see that amount awarded here in the USA, the next time someone serves some idiot a hot cup of coffee without extensive warning labels on it.
28. ChuChu353 - December 4th, 2007 at 10:59 pm
The 1937 New London School Explosion
29. ChuChu353 - December 4th, 2007 at 11:00 pm
I ment to add a Wiki link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N....._explosion
30. jfrater - December 5th, 2007 at 1:57 am
zubair - I am here
I had Internet troubles
31. RobS - December 5th, 2007 at 6:12 am
Martin L.,
I’ve read that the steel used in the construction of the Titanic was of inferior quality (Something about it having a high sulphur content and therefore being more brittle than it should have been), so that when the ship struck the iceberg, part of the hull actually shattered.
If that’s so, that would make it an engineering disaster.
32. Randall - December 5th, 2007 at 7:16 am
RobS is correct; the latest theory is that it was the brittleness of the steel, which was inferior grade (due to the sulphur content) which exacerbated the damage to the Titanic’s hull. The proper grade of steel would have *crumpled* rather than split apart, or at most would have produced a far smaller puncture, which would not have led to the sinking of the ship. Or, worst-case scenario, the ship would have still sunk—but at a much slower pace, allowing for the rescue of far more people.
The Titanic disaster occurred because of a combination of factors—some blame can be laid at the captain’s feet, and some blame goes to the number of lifeboats on board, which led to the large number of deaths, and so on. But as a matter strictly of engineering, one can say that what did the Titanic in most of all was poor quality steel.
33. Bonnie_ - December 5th, 2007 at 8:35 am
Martin L, the RMS Titanic had no movie theatre. Plus, “The Poseidon Adventure” was a novel first published in 1969 by Paul Gallico. It was never a silent movie and could not have been shown on the Titanic.
Love the Tacoma Narrows bridge, though there were no deaths. It would be an interesting list to see the greatest engineering disasters ranked by loss of life. Though I’m afraid China would win all the top slots…
34. Randall - December 5th, 2007 at 8:45 am
Bonnie: Martin is right about one thing–there *was* a silent film called “The Poseidon Adventure.” I know nothing of it being played on the Titanic–that sounds like an error—but such a movie did exist. Of course it had nothing to do with the later novel and 70s disaster epic. Remember—titles are not copyright-able.
ALSO… there was a novel published some years prior to the Titanic disaster, about a ship called “The Titan.” VERY similar circumstances to the Titanic… fascinating coincidence.
35. neilos - December 5th, 2007 at 8:58 am
I can’t access the larger images. When you click on it you get a message, “this image is from the list universe”. No biggie, but I used to be able to enlarge the thumbnails.
36. Scott - December 5th, 2007 at 9:08 am
Hello? Ever heard about the Hindenburg disaster?
37. Bonnie_ - December 5th, 2007 at 9:10 am
Randall, this story is a tongue-in-cheek urban legend. Take a look at the page that references this legend of a silent poseidon adventure:
http://www.snopes.com/lost/poseidon.htm
Hmm, seems like it’s confirmed, doesn’t it? But if you try the link to imdb, you get a clever fake. Check out the cast and you’ll find no listing of that movie in their biographies. Check out snopes and imdb and you can find no reference to a silent poseidon adventure.
Then look at the parent page of the odd-looking snopes article:
http://www.snopes.com/lost/
It says “We created The Repository of Lost Legends (TRoLL for short) for those of you who don’t let the truth get in the way of a good story.”
It’s a joke. Fun story, but not true. To wrap: There was no movie theatre on the Titanic, and there was no silent film version of “The Poseidon Adventure” shown there that night.
38. Rey - December 5th, 2007 at 9:18 am
jfrater, I’m also getting the “This image courtesy of…” pictures all over the site and the forums.
39. StewWriter - December 5th, 2007 at 9:34 am
Scott: I had indeed, but as the paragraph states under the airship in number two, it was actually a bigger disaster than the Hindenburg, so, not wanting to have two Zeppelin wrecks in ONE list, I went with the worst one instead. Thanks for calling me on it, though, I knew I’d get some flack for not mentioning it more!
40. jfrater - December 5th, 2007 at 9:47 am
Rey okay thanks - I will contact the sysadmins
41. RockChalk - December 5th, 2007 at 9:53 am
I have a friend whose mom died in the Hyatt bridge collapse. She was in a marachi band that was playing when walksways failed.
42. Mystern - December 5th, 2007 at 9:56 am
The Tacoma Bridge Disaster could have been totally avoided. The Golden Gate Bridge was built in 1937 and is a great example of how a suspension bridge should be constructed.
43. jfrater - December 5th, 2007 at 9:57 am
neilos: I have the sysadmins on it now - sorry about that
44. shaunism - December 5th, 2007 at 10:05 am
Ozhan: I saw that too - it was in Israel, I believe. Crazy video!
45. Shane S. - December 5th, 2007 at 10:08 am
What about the I-35W bridge collapse in Minneapolis this past August? 13 people died and 50 or more were injured.
46. shaunism - December 5th, 2007 at 10:17 am
Shane S.: I think that was more a case of maintenance neglect than a structural flaw, per se.
47. Randall - December 5th, 2007 at 10:47 am
Bonnie: VERY good. You’re a woman after my own heart—unwilling to accept what you read on the internet, even on Snopes.
I actually think I heard of a “silent” Poseidon Adventure somewhere else…I don’t recall seeing the page you linked me too… and I vaguely recall it was NOT about a sinking ship, but rather some kind of a war picture, I think… but then since my recollections are clearly just that—recollections (and extremely vague ones to boot) and YOU have uncovered real facts—then the hat’s tipped to you. Nice work.
And the band on the Titanic didn’t play that song, whatever it was… “Nearer My God to Thee”? either.
48. Bonnie_ - December 5th, 2007 at 11:09 am
Thanks, Randall. In an internet full of shouting people, it’s so nice to hang out on the listverse with quiet, courteous types who are inquisitive.
Also better than average looking, or so I hear.
49. Randall - December 5th, 2007 at 12:14 pm
Bonnie:
“In an internet full of shouting people, it’s so nice to hang out on the listverse with quiet, courteous types who are inquisitive.”
Are we talking about the same site?
Have you checked out some of the people on here? Quiet and courteous aren’t the descriptives that would leap immediately to my mind.
But I’m not being fair, really. Many of them seem nice enough, and willing to learn and spread some wisdom around.
“Also better than average looking, or so I hear.”
Is that so?
(But you know, it’s discounted if you only hear it from your mother.
)
50. SubliminalDeath666 - December 5th, 2007 at 12:54 pm
Chernobyl is probably the world’s most nuclear and chemically hazardous part of the world!
51. 8rustystaples - December 5th, 2007 at 1:12 pm
This list, even if labelled “U.S. Engineering Disasters”, is incomplete without mentioning the New Orleans levee system. Acknowledged by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as faulty in design and build, when the flood walls of the Industrial Canal and the 17th Street Canal and London Avenue Canal were breached after Hurricane Katrina, 80% of a major metropolitan area was flooded and uninhabitable. 1300 people died, and tens of thousands more were left homeless.
52. shaunism - December 5th, 2007 at 1:18 pm
8rustystaples: you are so right! I can’t think of another US engineering disaster that comes close to that.
I haven’t seen the Spike Lee movie about it yet. I should bump it up my LoveFilm queue…
53. 8rustystaples - December 5th, 2007 at 1:19 pm
20fan20, get your facts straight. The N.O. levees weren’t topped. Not even close. The flood walls were improperly built, the underground support for the wall not being long enough for structural integrity. That allowed water to seep under the flood walls which loosened the supporting substrate. The pressure from the increased volume of water in the canals (also man-made, by the way) caused portions of the inadequately supported walls to give way. The Army Corps of Engineers has admitted that not only were the walls not built properly, but that they knew about it at the time the flood walls were built.
That, my friend, is an engineering disaster.
54. Rey - December 5th, 2007 at 8:52 pm
Thanks jamie
Although I still have a few kinks on the right sidebar and the top frame.
55. jfrater - December 6th, 2007 at 1:14 am
Rey: If you hold down the shift key and press refresh does it fix the problem?
56. Rey - December 6th, 2007 at 2:25 am
Unfortunately it doesn’t.
57. jfrater - December 6th, 2007 at 2:28 am
Rey: is it the images at the top right? They are coming from a subdomain (images.listverse.com) which may be the problem - I will tell the sysadmins.
58. Patrask - December 6th, 2007 at 9:53 am
I find it interesting that every item on this list (except the Vasa and Chernobyl) are American.
Vasa is Swedish, Chernobyl would be either Russian or Ukraine.
59. ed9362 - December 6th, 2007 at 10:55 pm
Here is a good one, in 1970 the westgate bridge in melbourne, australia collapsed during the final stages of construction, 68 workmen fell 160 feet into the yarra river 35 of whom were killed. the list of engineering stuff ups that led to the collapse is longer than your arm,
This is considered one of the worst bridge building disasters in history.
http://www.trivia-library.com/.....n-1970.htm will give you more details.
60. Rey - December 6th, 2007 at 11:20 pm
Jamie: It includes the latest lists, the comments, the christmas competition picture, the pictures below (under the ad), and the topmost left pictures.
61. jfrater - December 7th, 2007 at 1:13 am
Rey: thanks for keeping me updated - I have contacted the sysadmins again and they will hopefully fix it this time once and for all!
62. jfrater - December 7th, 2007 at 1:50 am
ed9362:thanks for the link and for mentioning it. Definitely worthy of a mention here.
63. aplspud - December 8th, 2007 at 9:56 am
How about a counter list on amazing engineering successes? For example, the Brooklyn Bridge was erected in the late 1800s and was supposed to last for one hundred years, and its still going strong!
64. Rey - December 9th, 2007 at 6:22 pm
Rey: I tried surfing the site using a Mac, and listverse doesn’t have to seem to have any problem with a Mac Firefox browser. The problem is still with me
65. jfrater - December 10th, 2007 at 4:05 am
Rey: Is it still happening now? I have just been told by the admins that they have made more changes to fix it. If it is occuring in only one browser you have, I would suggest that the problem might be with either the browser or maybe even a firewall. Have you tried emptying your cache and doing a refresh?
66. Rey - December 10th, 2007 at 6:24 pm
Jamie: Everything is fine now. Thank you very much!
Back to my listverse addiction.
67. max - January 22nd, 2008 at 11:52 am
i don’t know if it belongs here but at the university of alberta in Edmonton, Alberta, in canada the one engineering building started to sink because the engineers who designed it didn’t take into cnosideration the equipment and machines to later be placed in the building
68. nelson - February 9th, 2008 at 5:42 pm
o video é mesmo espectacular
69. Hedlylamarr - June 25th, 2008 at 9:13 am
Fantastic film footage of the Tacoma Narrows bridge collapse.
I don’t recall ever seeing it in colour, has it been colourised I wonder ?
70. Rob - July 21st, 2008 at 4:41 pm
Skylab ultimately achieved all of its objectives. I’m not sure if you call it an engineering disaster as it was caused by a panel seperating from the rocket after liftoff. There was a plan to even extend its life but NASA sent all of its money to the space shuttle.
71. @WORK - July 28th, 2008 at 11:15 pm
typical egocentric american viewpoint … america, despite what most americans think, is not the WORLD … perhaps it’s just that deaths in other parts are of no importance.
72. Anon - July 29th, 2008 at 12:05 am
Does the 1879 Scottish Tay Bridge disaster qualify? If so, it’s another non-American. Without it we would also lack *William Topaz McGonagall’s famous deathless piece of commemorative poetry, ‘The Tay Bridge Disaster’. If you don’t know it, hunt it down.
*Widely acclaimed as the worst poet in British history (Wikipedia), so he goes with the theme!
73. jack - August 8th, 2008 at 3:42 am
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T.....e_Disaster
74. E3 - September 19th, 2008 at 7:59 am
this website sucks
75. Alex - October 1st, 2008 at 5:51 am
well that sucked
76. Alex - October 1st, 2008 at 5:52 am
sucky
77. Desertrogue - November 14th, 2008 at 12:36 pm
Thats an inreresting comment regarding the attempt of the Titanic to break a transatlantic speed record. This would have been impossible for the Titanic to achieve. The Blue Ribband for the fastest Westbound crossing was held at the time by RMS Mauretania which set the record in 1909 with an average speed of 26.06 knots over a period of 4 days, 10 hours and 40 minutes. The Titanic could not make over 23 knots. She used outdated reciprocating engines on her outer shafts and only used a single turbine on her center shaft. Mauretania had 4 shafts to Titanics 3 and all 4 were turbine driven. The Mauretania made 68,000 shaft horsepower in her oringinal configuration and weighed 31,938 tons while Titanic made only 59,000 shaft horsepower and weighed in at a portly 46,328 tons. Power to weight ratio, baby. Mauretania also had much slimmer, finer hull lines than Titanic. No way could Titanic have been the fastest not while “Maury” reigned.
78. pyderz - December 5th, 2008 at 4:37 am
Chernobyl should of been number one, that was easily the worst disaster there, effects of it are still felt today.
And james Liverpool FC BABYYY ALRITEEEE!!! TOP of the Leaguee!