WARNING: Some adult and shocking content is featured here. This article shows some of the most bizarre art in modern history. Art has progressed well past the concept of recognisable structures to completely outlandish (and often nightmarish) images. Seeing is believing, so here is the list:
1. The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living [Wikipedia]
Artist: Damien Hirst
Damien Hirst (born June 7, 1965) is an English artist and the most prominent of the group that has been dubbed “Young British Artists” (or YBAs). He dominated the art scene in Britain during the 1990s and is internationally renowned. Death is a central theme in his work. He is best known for his Natural History series, in which dead animals (such as a shark, a sheep or a cow) are preserved, sometimes cut-up, in formaldehyde.
His iconic work is The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living, a 14-foot tiger shark immersed in formaldehyde in a vitrine. Its sale in 2004 made him the second most expensive living artist after Jasper Johns. In June 2007, Hirst became the most expensive living artist with the sale of a medicine chest, Lullaby Spring, for £9.65 million at Sotheby’s in London.
2. My Bed [Wikipedia]
Artist: Tracey Emin
Tracey Emin RA (born 3 July 1963) is an English artist of Turkish Cypriot origin, one of the group known as Britartists or YBAs (Young British Artists). She has succeeded in equalling, if not surpassing, Damien Hirst among the YBAs in terms of notoriety among the general public.
A drunken outburst on a Channel 4 TV discussion, and My Bed — an installation in the 1999 Turner Prize exhibition, consisting of her own unmade dirty bed with used condoms and blood-stained underwear — both caused a media furore.
3. Bend IT [Wikipedia]
Artist: Gilbert and George
Gilbert Prousch (or Proesch) (born in San Martin (San Martino), Italy, September 11, 1943) and George Passmore (born in Devon, England January 8, 1942), better known as Gilbert & George, are artists. They have worked almost exclusively as a pair. The two first met on 25th September 1967 while studying sculpture at St Martins School of Art, now Central Saint Martins College of Art and Design, one of six colleges in the University of the Arts, London.
They were initially known as performance artists. While still students they made The Singing Sculpture (1970), for which they covered themselves in gold metallic paint, stood on a table, and mimed to a recording of Flanagan and Allen’s song “Underneath the Arches”, sometimes for hours at a time.
4. Dolls [Wikipedia]
Artist: Hans Bellmer
Hans Bellmer (1902 Kattowitz, Silesia – 23 February 1975 Paris, France) was an artist, best known for the life-sized pubescent female dolls he produced in the mid-1930s. He is also commonly thought of, in the art world, as a Surrealist photographer. Since 1926 he had been working as a draftsman for his own advertising company. He initiated his doll project to oppose the fascism of the Nazi Party by declaring that he would make no work that would support the German state.
Bellmer’s doll developed from a series of three events in his personal life: meeting a beautiful teenage cousin in 1932; attending a performance of Jacques Offenbach’s Tales of Hoffmann (in which a man falls tragically in love with an automaton); and receiving a box of his old toys. After these events he began to construct his first doll.
5. Cadaver 3 [Wikipedia]
Artist: Gunther Von Hagens
Gunther von Hagens (b. Gunther Liebchen, January 10, 1945) is a controversial German anatomist who invented the plastination technique to preserve specimens and is heavily involved in its promotion. He developed the Body Worlds exhibition of human bodies and body parts. Von Hagens has a distinct German accent, and wears a black hat during his instructional cadaver dissection videos.
In January 2004, the German news magazine Der Spiegel reported that von Hagens had acquired some corpses from executed prisoners in China; he countered that he did not know the origin of the bodies and went on to cremate several of the disputed cadavers. German prosecutors declined to press charges, and Von Hagens was granted an interim injunction against Der Spiegel in March 2005, preventing the magazine from claiming that Body Worlds contain the bodies of executed prisoners.
6. Death II [Wikipedia]
Artist: Jack and Dinos Chapman
Jake Chapman (born 1966) and Dinos Chapman (born 1962) are brothers and English conceptual artists who work almost exclusively in collaboration with each other. They came to prominence as part of the Young British Artists movement promoted by Charles Saatchi. In their early career they worked as assistants to Gilbert and George.
The Chapman brothers were nominated for the Turner Prize in 2003. As well as including Insult to Injury, their Turner Prize exhibit debuted two new works Sex and Death. Sex directly referenced their previous work Great Deeds against the Dead. The original work shows three dismembered corpses hanging from a tree, Sex shows the same scenario, but in a heightened state of decay.
7. Janet
Artist: Clare Shenstone
Clare Shenstone completed her MA at the Royal College of Art in 1979. She was told that a ‘distinguished visitor’ had been looking at her degree show and left his telephone number. She phoned: it was Francis Bacon, who said ‘I love your work’. He wanted to by a particular piece titled ‘Janet’, this had been the artist’s first attempt at what she calls ‘cloth heads’.
Over the following two years she spent a lot of time with Bacon, making over fifty oil, gouache, pastel and pencil sketches of him. Since then Clare has exhibited widely across London and completed numerous other notable commissions including portraits of Zöe Wanamaker, Ronald Harwood and David Bowie.
8. Fountain [Wikipedia]
Artist: Marcel Duchamp
Fountain is a 1917 work by Marcel Duchamp. It is one of the pieces which he called readymades (also known as found art), because he made use of an already existing object—in this case a urinal, which he titled Fountain and signed R. Mutt. Marcel Duchamp had arrived in the United States less than two years previous to the “creation” of Fountain, and had become involved with Dada, an anti-rational, anti-art cultural movement, in New York City.
Like the use of the word “Dada” for the art movement, the meaning (if any) and intention of the signature “R. Mutt” is difficult to pin down precisely. Mutt and Jeff was a popular contemporary comic strip. It is not clear whether Duchamp had in mind the German “armut” (meaning poverty), but he did state that the initial “R” stood for “Richard”, which is slang in French for “moneybags”. It is also suggested that R. Mutt is a play off R. Mott, the company that produced the Paris sewer pipes.
9. Innocent X avec viande [Wikipedia]
Artist: Francis Bacon
Francis Bacon (28 October 1909 – 28 April 1992) was a gay Irish figurative painter. He was a collateral descendant of the Elizabethan philosopher Francis Bacon. His artwork is well known for its bold, austere, and often grotesque or nightmarish imagery. The philosopher Gilles Deleuze has contributed greatly to the interpretation of Bacon’s work.
This work, Completed, and delivered to the Beaux-Arts gallery in February 1953, of “Study after Velázquez’s Portrait of Pope Innocent X” (1953), Bacon said “I wanted to paint a head as if folded in on itself, like the folds of a curtain”. The Titian Portrait of Cardinal Filippo Archinto (c.1551-1562) is often cited as an ancestor to this device.
10. Vanitas: Flesh Dress for an Albino Anorectic [Wikipedia]
Artist: Jana Sterbak
Jana Sterbak (born 1955) is a Canadian artist best known for her works constructed from meat. Two sculptures, Vanitas: Flesh Dress for an Albino Anorectic (1987) and Chair Apollinaire (1999), were both works whose primary medium was cured flank steak.
Sterbak’s works deal primarily with issues of power, sexuality, and control, and she also explores the relationship between humanity and the technology it has created. Her Standard Lives – Abridged was displayed in the centre of Newcastle-upon-Tyne in September-October 1990.





























120. HiellaGuru-
well, how nice of you. art is many things, art is everything, and art is nothing. you made your point.
Art is as important as philosophy these days,one might argue even more so, since its in ones face as many would argue it should be, here we have the sword of Damocles. While philosophy is the base on which art is founded its nonetheless in the boiler room and in an unholy mess. Since philosophy and art are our main avenues for evoloution they are also the avenue to devoloution. I dont think art or philosophy should be looked at as a means in themselves. They are at the very core of what we are and are to become. I would consider therefore most modern artists as primative, neglectful, inconsiderate with little or no relevance to our development. Duchamps expansion of art into three dimentions is valid, however he misses the innumerable dimentions of someone like Dali. Just because something is presented two dimentionally dosent mean that it is two dimentional, only that the media is. Surely atrt transcends its medium if that is infact what it it.
Art really took its cue from the renaissance as a counterpoint to religious virtuosity. Even though the churches are empty it still raps on this theme… yawn.
It brought about a change in perception and revoloution!
So apropos what is art? What is its purpose? Can we discover its fundamental aspects? Plumbing is not thereoetical physics, which is coming to accept though light years from confirming what we knew all along. Something can be infinitely large and infinitely small simultaneously. Finally the world is coming to accept, perhaps influenced by my conceptual piece “Dinasaur Chicken” that birds have evolved from dinasaurs. Discover the artist within you and you wont need takeaways.
“I’ll be back.”… exterminate… exterminate… I am a Dalek!
I hereby throw down the gauntlet and challenge the very foundations of the art establishment, however high the brow, however erudite, to prove their metal. Perhaps a few Doctors of art, (generally more reasonable than the Doctorors of art)and of course the chuwawas of the art world, better known as the art critique for which I have the utmost respect. Established artists or otherwise at the high end are most welcome as indeed is anyone capable of decorum. Do bear in mind this is not a fishmarket, nor is one dealing with the Gestapo. Do forgive attendant errors in grammer and spelling, I am somewhat dyslectic though not intolerably so. However, more often than not spelling mistakes are not spelling mistakes at all but rather a device of color and sound to convey the ineffable. I wish to discuss “Distributed Being”, which I have aptly renamed “Tosspot” in defference perhaps even defiance of the author and which is a substantial conceptual piece. It is neither influenced nor has anything to do with the attendant sobriquet but everything to do with fine art and accompanies my minamilist composition “For Want Of A Better Word”. “I’ll be back”.
HiellaGuru may be a conceptual art piece, but not one which appeals to me. I understand it. I am capable of it, or at least I did it when I was young and inexperienced.
I take my art very seriously now, though seriously is the wrong word for something which brings such joy and playfulness to my life.
Let’s say I disagree with HiellaGuru stylistically. Doesn’t mean either of us is wrong. Just that we approach Art differently.
There is room in the world for all sorts of Art.
No doubt “For Want Of A Better Word” is not the final word on minimalism, which is an extremely complex form. Perhaps though not “perhaps” “is” the final word, if anyone can come up with a better one i’d love to hear it.
104. gabi31: Same here on the Duane Hansen. They had “The Swimmer” on the second floor and I nearly screamed when I saw it. It looked like the guy was about to stand up and start talking. I literally ran out of that section and hid in the one next to it. The friend who was with me at the time offered me $20 to go up to the “Security Guard” for a closer look and I flat out turned her down.
His work is more unnerving than wax museum sculptures.
segue-
i think i’m with you. your experience is probably twice mine (in years and in output -probably much, much more of the latter
i left sculpture, ceramics, and poetry for science -in the day to day, anyway!) and i sense HiellaGuru’s is less. and that doesn’t make me disapproving or a censor of his/her “piece,” it’s just not what i would have done, not now.
so HiellaGuru have fun, see where it takes you
HiellaGuru is not art she dosent even exist, she may well be an artist but her fluids are discreet.
Duchamp took to playing chess and did so with a plum.
I drove him to it. Generally speaking she drives one crazy and one cant help oneself.
Hiella is a concept by which one measures ones pane.
Sorry I havent been myself lately… “I’ll be back”.
But of course we’ll never survive unless we get a little bit crazy. I mean shes got to be pulling my leg or is she pulling hers?
No really i’m back, though not for good, I hope. Nothing like losing oneself for a while, its a pity one cant make a permanent departure and simply become selfless. I cant help feeling sorry for that poor distributed being. One thing i’m sure of they had potential. The distributed being in question was in a terrible state when he told his tale. He was mopped up with the others. Must leave now… but… “I’ll be back”.
130. lo – “i left sculpture, ceramics, and poetry for science”
I did the opposite! well…no…I double majored in art (concentration in oil painting) and biology (to be biochem) and simply dropped the biology.
129. quicksilvermad
I suggest checking ahead of time to see if Mark Jenkins is “exhibiting” before you go back to DC then. Most of his stuff is much more whimsical but occasionally one or two still scare me. Once I saw what I thought was a homeless guy in a blue hoodie sitting against a building and I thought “hmm, no beard…” and when I tried to look at his face as I was dropping some change and THERE WAS NOTHING THERE.
127. segue – “seriously is the wrong word for something which brings such joy and playfulness to my life”
But seriously, I understand. …It’s that yearning for creative challenge, comfort of being in my element and relishing the joy of making something I’m really proud of – that’s what gets me up in the morning.
Serious is the right word! Serious about finding joy and playfulness!
138. gabi319: Oh dear God… That is really freakish. I live in the DC Metro area and I tend to hang out in the National Portrait Gallery (I sit in the sculpture rooms and sketch) rather than the Hirshorn or the Eastern Wing of the Smithsonian Gallery. Mainly because I’m more a fan of portraits in general. I’m an illustrator/graphic designer just three weeks away from graduating with my BFA. I’ve never really been able to enjoy “modern art” as my personal gestalt is geared more toward Rockwell, Vermeer, and the daddy of all photorealists: Chuck Close.
Chuck has a paper pulp version of “Philip” on display in the “modern” section of the National Portrait Gallery (right across from another freaky Duane Hansen piece). I long ago made a solemn vow to see at least one of Chuck’s earlier nine foot portraits (the ones he did with just an eraser, a knife, and a tube of black paint) in person. His paper pulp work is close (from far away), but I want to be able to feel that punch in the chest of awe like I did with the first Norman Rockwell painting I saw.
139. quicksilvermad
O RLY?! I live around the area too! But when I can sneak into DC I usually gravitate between the East and West wing of National Gallery – ESPECIALLY on the weekdays because there’s less people to bother me. During summertime in middle school, I’d take art workshops and we’d take a Saturday to spend at the Gallery to wander, sketch, whatever. Without fail, half of us would come back with stories about how we’d be sketching and some tourist would either stand behind us and watch our every move or worse, stand next to or in front of the art, I suppose in hopes of being “drawn in”. I had the second. He must have stood there for nearly five minutes in what I assume was his thoughtful superman pose. Too bad I was sketching the piece next to the one he thought I was drawing.
I occasionally go to the Hirshorn just to see what’s going on in contemporary life but…meh. For some reason, the interior just seems so…depressing. I THINK I’ve seen that Chuck Close you talk about but wasn’t there a really really huge Chuck Close there? I could’ve sworn I had seen a huge Close self portrait there but it’s been a while since I’ve been to NPG so I might be confusing it with a different gallery… Were you there to see Stephen Colbert’s painting? I saw the tv segment about it and thought it was hilarious. They placed it between the men’s and women’s bathrooms and he was so proud because “it was the most visited portrait in the whole gallery.”
I can’t really say if I have a particular favorite painter because of my profession as a visual alchemist (technically scenic artist but I think visual alchemist sounds cooler). I make wood look like brick, foam look like rock and pvc pipe look like tree and the occasional painting-of-different-genres reproduction work that kind of demands me to be a jack of all trades in paint styles which kind of bled into a jack of all trades in terms of style and artist preferences…hence, there really isn’t much I won’t dismiss. But modern art was a hard one to venture into, so I definitely know what you’re saying! Congrats on almost graduating! You’re in a really good place to graduate; There’s a HUGE market here for graphic design.
140. gabi319: Oh man, I hate it when people hover when I’m sketching. They pace “nonchalantly” behind me for about ten minutes before I get tired of them and slap my sketchbook shut. I could spend all day in the NPG—it’s so huge—but my feet end up killing me after five hours.
I think they moved the other Chuck Close. Or it could have been in the Eastern Gallery for a while. I haven’t been back there since the Dada exhibit (and fulfilled every artist’s life quotient of seeing a Pollock, a Rothko, a Picasso, and a Caulder) so I guess I should check it out again. I go during the week as well and plan on doing the “gallery rounds” right after graduation. When it’s slightly warmer. Our portfolio show is actually on March 26th at the National Building Museum (quite the name, huh?).
I got to see the Colbert Portrait twice. I did a dorky photo with me holding up his book next to it. And this is the Close piece they have on display.
I’ve got two words for my personal “worst” example of “modern art.” Barnett Newman and his “12 Stations of the Cross.” It’s just twelve blank canvases. I have never understood how a blank canvas can be considered art.
138. gabi319-
well, i spent 2 years majoring in fine arts studio with an english minor beginning back in 1998. then i spent a year and a half as a ceramics TA/general studio assistant at another college where i wasn’t enrolled -i wasn’t in school at all at the time (hired based on portfolio and enthusiasm). then life took me many other places, now i’m back in school studying botany and plant & soil sciences with an end interest in non-traditional/urban & tropical agriculture.
i never gave up on loving and seeing art in my life, i just found something else to do that i also loved
and traveling and learning other trades just allowed me to see the art in even more of life’s strange realities.
Bizarre! No doubt one is familiar with the erudition and sublime output of GG Allin.
A matchless performance artist that would put Andres Serrano to shame.
‘Madonna and Child II’ is simply breathtaking. In fact so shocking is the imagery that I have yet to catch my breath. Deeply disturbing Halo’s counterpoint innocente marbelesque ephemerati immersed in urinic gold. “Lay off the coke Andres try Acid” it seems he took my advice.
Allin has always been staunchly conservative, drawn to minimalism at an early age, he progressed rapidly to Neo Dadaism before finally finding his niche in “Performance Art”.
I’m quite fond of blank canvases. The blank canvas is an attempt to have the last word on minimalism. However, since I have that “honour” it smacks of primate. He may argue a case of “conceptual” validation, but i’d take him apart. I display blank canvases sometimes and invite people to paint whatever they can’t paint. Kids love it.
Now for something completely different….
“Deconstructional Mathemathics In Bra & Panties”. owes absoloutely nothing to Surrealism and wouldnt pay up if it did!
Deconstructional mathemathics is basically a method of philosophical and literary language which emphasizes the internal workings of language and conceptual systems, the relational quality of meaning and the assumptions implicit in forms of expression applied to mathemathical structure for which an empirical model is required. Perhaps this is oversimplistic…
When I first “saw” this conceptual masterpiece it didnt add up… It took a later work “The 21 dimentions Of Sal.” to convince me that it had effectively Deconstructed Surrealism.
Is it conceptual one may ask? Well not exactly. Its really a study of Relativistic Inconceptual Realism and as such belongs to this category. However, I feel the work itself would not take umbrage for being panned as “Conceptual” being more concerned with its attire.
Arthur Gobb (Art) and Hans Spittel (Flemish) both agreed that it was a “travesty of justice” which is not to be confused with Spittels “Travesty of Justice et Julienne” which Gobb has condemned as “a culinary distraction”. There damnably difficult to work with always at one anothers throats, its pathetic.
142. lo
Weird, mine’s the COMPLETE opposite! Two years into Bio major right before redefining it into a biochem major (how they preferred to do things at that place) BUT I had to drop it because the Graphic design department stipulates that you cannot be a double major. It was a hard choice and though I love science, art has always been had the strongest pull on me regardless of whatever else I get involved in. That’s all pointless now since I dropped GD and went to visual art. I always said I’d give myself five years to see if I found this job worthwhile and if not I’d go back to school for biochem. Sometimes I think I’d go back to school part time even if I plan to stick with scenic art because on occasion, I do miss the rigid structure of the Scientific Method, haha
141. quicksilvermad
I am very familiar with Barnett…he doesn’t do anything for me either…but I’ll try to shed some light on his m.o. to see if that opens up a small level of understanding why he does what he does. Barnett (and a number of other artists like Frankenthaler, Stella) seem to play more mechanics than artists in the traditional sense. They don’t focus on the world surrounding them (basically art before 20th century), they don’t focus on surrounding world in a new perspective (impresssionist, post-modern, etc.), they don’t create art to explore the mind (Pollock, Dali, etc.) but rather take a mechanical engineering approach to art by simply studying what they have (i.e. the canvas, the paint, the brush). They create solely through those materials to explore the possibilities with just what is given to them rather than complicating it with what they consider are unnecessaries. In their minds (and technically, the goal of much of the art journey in the 19th and 20th century) the purest possible art that can be created. But again speaking technically, while purest that can be physically sought, it’s still not the its true purest form. Just as pure thought goes through some alterations on its journey from brain to mouth, there’s still something lost from creative idea to creative expression, which is why some artists are still seeking to find new ways to further the groundwork Barnett had explored.
Quicksilver:
Brett Favre Packer Jersey?!?! oh you better hide that one, haha… I was living in Milwaukee when the Colbert painting was up (ONLY reason why I missed taking my picture with it). Just as the community mourned when he decided to retire (mourned, I mean truly MOURNED…the atmosphere was depressing)…they put as much energy into scorn and a little bit of anger at Favre’s decision to come back.
Damien Hirst better known as “Charles Saatchi’s barrel-organ monkey” ref item 1.
On 10 September 2002, on the eve of the first anniversary of the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks, Hirst said in an interview with BBC News Online:
“The thing about 9/11 is that it’s kind of like an artwork in its own right … Of course, it’s visually stunning and you’ve got to hand it to them on some level because they’ve achieved something which nobody would have ever have thought possible – especially to a country as big as America. So on one level they kind of need congratulating, which a lot of people shy away from, which is a very dangerous thing.”
Of course he later apologised they always do!
On one occasion he attempted to emulate GG Allin by putting a cigarette in the end of his apendage in front of journalists. Unfortunately it wasnt lighted and was inserted the wrong way.
Poor Damien “A dedicated follower of fashion.”
I guess what Damien would like to say as indeed would many modern artists is that Hitler was an artist. Why so shy?
Certainly a lot went into his “work”! Perhaps we’ll be the next exhibit.
Of course things are not always pretty but theres a difference between Saving private Ryan, The Grey Zone…
and saying “Way to go mate”.
Many raise the question of freedom of expression. It would seem that this freedom extends to crucifying anyone that has the audacity to embrace life… “I’ll be back”
So maybe this isnt rocknroll but then it isnt genocide either. “Art” is a “creative” mechanism. Truth is lies… Freedom is slavery… ring any bells? We’ll be the first to go.
These rather bizarre creatures would be very much at home as camp administrators, fortunately they do have this avenue of pretence to vent their frustration… ouvre le chein…
Theres only one question… Albert Camus implies in the “Myth of Sisphus” Live or Die or put another way Love or Hate or put another way create or destroy.
Camus is perhaps the most underated Philosopher and writer of the twentieth century.
A. R. Rahman made his choice (a matter of public record) and while I cant abide his airtel number… I mean its so sickly.. he made a choice hes not going to regret… Some good songs too, nothing terribly deep.
I’d quite like “Damiens Head” a conceptual piece though admittedly not one of my best… which consists of Damiens rotting head infused with live maggots and dead flies. Pretty much the state its in at the moment… “I’ll be back.”
Well thats certainly a point, but how can you kill something thats dead already!
Modern Art, Post Modern Art, dead and buried.
A clue…
“Full Throttle”, an unambiguous depiction of avant gaurd eclecticism. The use of suffused black unashamedly delineating the raw power of an antique enfield voluptuously consuming a robust conceptual skyline.
Eruditely applied rapid fire brushwork pulsates outwardly from this curious canvas.
Use the technique, paint it if you like it.
The concept isnt the paint, it isnt the media, these are the tools used to put it to rest.
Neither can I and I wouldnt if I could.
Not being able to paint is a distinct advantage since it enables one to paint what one cant paint.
In other words one has complete freedom of expression.
The most valued possession of an artist is ones integrity, lose that and one loses ones art. Duchamp lost his so he took to playing chess. In other words he could no longer be honest about his work. He did the right thing in continuing to be honest about himself.
I have reason to believe there is life on Alpha Centauri does any one have a telescope large enough to confirm the observation? Must leave now… but… “i’ll be back”.
147. gabi319: *SHAME* Oh, please do not judge me for my Favre jersey. I mourned as well—more when Reggie White retired (and even more when he passed)—but still… I’ve been a Packers fan since I was a kid and finally had enough to get the jersey. Then he goes and “retires.”
Then joins the Jets.
And I hang my head in shame.
But at least I got a major portion of actual portfolio work done yesterday. That’s a load off my shoulders.
Dan Sly, Stella Plop:
gee, thanks for letting me know I am schizophrenic… I’m sure my doctors are completely incompetent for never picking that up…*sarcasm sarcasm sarcasm*
In case you didn’t read the above posts, it’s a conceptual piece involving stream of consciousness. We haven’t necessarily agreed with any of it but a number of young artists simply feel the idealistic need to “go against the grain” and “attempt the ‘new’ and ‘original’”. She isn’t harming anyone so why not indulge her fancy?
164. quicksilvermad
hey, no shame. My dad’s a diehard skins fan so saying I liked Favre was kinda not allowed but that Seattle game last year kinda cinched it for me – I actually asked for a Favre jersey for my birthday last year, haha. I had the poor timing to ask the day before he officially retired so I definitely was not getting one. But it was a great game and my friends back here got to see how I did things in MLK.
I hope your portfolio show goes well! I’m not sure how things go from a week to week basis, but if it’s open to the public, I’ll try to stop by!
~sigh~ I can see hell is still frozen over. So, I’ll be back. I’ll be back. I’ll be back. I’ll be back. I’ll be back. I’ll be back. I’ll be back. I’ll be back.
segue-
no.
but apparently this list’s content section has become an art house chatroom.
or did i stumble into another dimension? *blinks*
no f’ing clue what most of the preceding comments have to do w/ this list.
think we need a list of ‘top 10 lists w/ comment sections that have totally gone off topic’ or something like that.
*sigh* apparently some folks have nothing better to do or worse yet, commandeer sites for free for their own use.
Cyn, it’s as if someone who can’t *do* art has decided to *become* art, and failed miserably. Someone needs a dog.
167. Cyn – ‘top 10 lists w/ comment sections that have totally gone off topic’
Only 10? Good luck picking out ONLY 10!
segue – or a blog they pay for to post their ‘art’
gabi- ’10′ being an arbituary #
& actually, lotta lists have drifted…considerably…but then either returned to the ‘essence’ of the original list or simply died due to lack of attention. i’m thinking of lists w/ comment sections that have evolved into whole different life forms *wink wink nudge nudge*
& thankfully not too many of those…..yet.
I’m pretty sure “My Bed” is a reference to Robert Rauschenberg’s work of the same title…
http://www.moma.org/collection/browse_results.php?criteria=O%3AAD%3AE%3A4823&page_number=4&template_id=1&sort_order=1
171. agrivatedplatypus: Being very familiar with Rauschenberg’s work, I’d say you were right.
I used to go to his gallery openings at Gemini GEL, oh, so long ago. I knew that whole crowd, if only peripherally, but enough to get invited to private showings.
So long ago, so far away.
Hieronymus Bosch has to be #1 and as an earlier poster said Geiger and of course Dali, art as they say; is in the eye of the beholder but the glorious minds which conceive them…aah…beauty!
173. lostatsea: art as they say; is in the eye of the beholder…
****
Or, as the old joke goes, Art is a window washer in Seattle.
The video for #3 – Bend IT was extremely trippy.
Hmm, having bashed modern art for years, I’d actually love to have a good look at Hirst’s shark. But its the sort of thing that should be in a museum not an art gallery.
The problem with modern art is that there is rarely any sense of accomplishment in the productions.
Von Hagens stuff is possibly the most seminal work.
Believe it or not, but Marcel Duchamps Fountain is voted as the most inspiring art in conceptual art ever
Art? Please…. A toilet? A dead shark? Meat? A dirty bed?
I love the work of the Body Worlds exhibit. I saw it while it was in my hometown and it was stunning and spectacular. It was bizarre, but so beautiful. An incredible view of the human body. Awesome job for including it!
Yes, I know “Janet”… She is very much.