The Catholic Church claims that it is the oldest Christian Church in the world, dating back to Jesus himself. In the time that the Church has been on earth, many unusual traditions have arisen. While most of them seem perfectly normal to Catholics, to non-Catholics they often seem outright bizarre. This is a list of the ten most bizarre aspects of Catholicism. In no particular order:
1. Stigmata Wikipedia
Stigmata is when a person has unexplained wounds on their body that coincide with the traditional wounds that Christ had. In some cases the wounds can appear in only one or two of the areas, but there have been instances of it occurring in all five places that Christ was wounded. The wounds can cause considerable pain which has been known to worsen on certain religious feast days. There have been occasional cases of falsified stigmata in the past and some people claim that even those which are not proven to be falsified are somehow part of a hoax.
The photograph above is of Saint Pio of Pietrelcina (Canonized in 2002) who is the most recent stigmatic in the Catholic Church. Saint Pio is the latest in a long line of famous stigmatics – the most famous of whom is probably St Francis of Assisi. Writing to his spiritual director, Saint Pio said:
Then last night something happened which I can neither explain nor understand. In the middle of the palms of my hands a red mark appeared, about the size of a penny, accompanied by acute pain in the middle of the red marks. The pain was more pronounced in the middle of the left hand, so much so that I can still feel it. Also under my feet I can feel some pain.
It is also alleged that Saint Pio was able to bi-locate (appear in two places at once) and to read the sins on a person’s soul.
2. The Cilice Catholic Encylopedia
A cilice is an item worn on the body to inflict pain or discomfort for the sake of penance (remorse for your past actions). Originally a cilice was an undergarment made of rough hair (such as a hairshirt) or cloth. In recent times it has been seen as more discreet to wear a chain which has spikes on it. Contrary to popular belief, the cilice does not break the skin – it merely causes discomfort. It is usually worn around the thigh.
The Catholic Encylopedia of 1913 says:
“In modern times the use of the hairshirt [(cilice)] has been generally confined to the members of certain religious orders. At the present day only the Carthusians and Carmelites wear it by rule; with others it is merely a matter of custom or voluntary mortification.”
In recent years the cilice has gained a great deal of publicity due to the book The Da Vinci Code in which it is worn by the main antagonist of the story – though in the story it is exaggeratedly described as causing wounds. Wearing the cilice has always been an optional practice for Catholics. Some famous people in the past to have worn them are Saint Thomas More and Saint Patrick.
3. The Flagrum Catholic Encylopedia
The Flagrum is a type of scourge with small hard objects attached to the length of its cords. It is traditionally used to whip oneself (self-flagellation) and is most commonly found in conservative religious orders. The flagrum is held in one hand and thrown over the shoulder in order to cause the cords to strike the flesh. The purpose of self-flagellation is voluntary penance and mortification of the flesh (a safeguard against committing further sins).
The most famous Saint to use the flagrum is probably Saint John Vianney, who would give his parishoners very light penances in confession and then flog himself in privacy for their benefit (it is believed by Catholics that acts of penance can be offered for the sins of other living people or the souls of the dead). When Saint John Vianney died, the walls of his bedroom had spatterings of blood on them from his extreme use of the flagrum.
According to the Catholic Encyclopedia:
“St. Peter Damian (died 1072) [...] wrote a special treatise in praise of self-flagellation; though blamed by some contemporaries for excess of zeal, his example and the high esteem in which he was held did much to popularize the voluntary use of the scourge or “discipline” as a means of mortification and penance.”
Most Catholics who practice this form of discipline will not admit it publicly as it would be seen as a lack of humility that could lead to the sin of pride.
4. Confraternities of the Cord Catholic Encylopedia
The third, (and final) of the penance-related objects, the Confraternities of the Cord are groups who wear a knotted cord around their waist as a form of penance and in order to help prevent future sins. The cord can be worn loosely in remembrance of the Saint for whom the cord is named, or it can be worn tight enough to cause pain, as has been the case with numerous saints in history.
St Joseph, St Francis, St Thomas, and St Augustine, St Nicholas, and St Monica all have Confraternities of the Cord named after them. The Catholic Encylopedia says:
In the early Church virgins wore a cincture as a sign and emblem of purity, and hence it has always been considered a symbol of chastity as well as of mortification and humility. The wearing of a cord or cincture in honour of a saint is of very ancient origin, and we find the first mention of it in the life of St. Monica.
The various confraternities differ in the number of knots on the cord.
5. Relics Catholic Encylopedia
Relics are objects related to Saints. There are three categories of relics (from wikipedia):
1st Class
Items directly associated with the events of Christ’s life (manger, cross, etc.), or the physical remains of a saint (a bone, a hair, a limb, etc.). Traditionally, a martyr’s relics are often more prized than the relics of other saints. Also, some saints relics are known for their extraordinary incorruptibility and so would have high regard. It is important to note that parts of the saint that were significant to that saint’s life are more prized relics. For instance, King St. Stephen of Hungary’s right forearm is especially important because of his status as a ruler. A famous theologian’s head may be his most important relic.
2nd Class
An item that the saint wore (a sock, a shirt, a glove, etc.) Also included is an item that the saint owned or frequently used, for example, a crucifix, book etc. Again, an item more important in the saint’s life is thus a more important relic.
3rd Class
Anything which has touched a first or second class relic of a saint.
In order to prevent abuses, Catholic Church law (Canon Law) forbids the sale of Relics (Can. 1190 §1). Catholics venerate relics in the same way as they venerate images, statues, and saints. This is often confused for idol worship, but veneration is actually the act of giving respect, rather than the act of worshipping which is forbidden. By canon law there must be a relic in the altar stone of any altar in a Catholic Church upon which Mass is to be offered.
6. Indulgences Catholic Encylopedia
Catholics believe that when a person sins, they have two punishments to suffer – eternal (Hell) and temporal (punishment by suffering on earth or in Purgatory). Indulgences are special actions that a person can perform in order to reduce or remove the temporal punishment they are owed. The idea behind it is that certain acts of holiness can take the place of punishment. Indulgences must be declared by the Pope.
There are two types of indulgence: Plenary (removes all temporal punishment) and partial (removes some punishment). A partial indulgence can be for a specific number of days or years. Some indulgences only apply to the souls in Purgatory but any personal indulgences can also be offered for those souls, rather than your own. An example of an indulence is: “An indulgence, applicable only to the Souls in Purgatory, is granted to the faithful, who devoutly visit a cemetery and pray, even if only mentally, for the departed. The indulgence is plenary each day from the 1st to the 8th of November; on other days of the year it is partial.” (from the Enchiridion of Indulgences).
During the middle ages, a number of Bishops and Priests, seeking to make money, told people that they could pay for indulgences. This abuse partly contributed to the sparking off of the protestant reformation. While the Catholic Church tried to suppress this behavior, it took a great deal of time for the traffic in indulgences to stop completely.
It is quite common for the Pope to announce new indulgences from time to time, to mark special occasions – such as the Jubilee in which Pope John Paul II granted a plenary indulgence.
7. The Real Presence Wikipedia
The Real Presence is the term used to describe the bread and wine in a Catholic Mass. Catholics believe that after the words of consecration have been spoken by the Priest, the bread (host) and wine change their substance to become the body and blood of Jesus. It is considered by Catholics, therefore, to be appropriate to worship and adore the changed objects. This is often seen as idol worship by non-Catholics as they do not believe the change of substance has occurred.
Because of this belief, Catholics have a special ceremony called Benediction, in which a consecrated host is placed in an ornate case called a monstrance and the people are blessed with it and kneel and pray before it. you can see an image of Pope Benedict XVI blessing people with a monstrance here.
An interesting side note is that it is believed that the modern term “hocus pocus” comes from an aberration of the words used by a priest at the moment of the consecration, in which he says: “Hoc est enim corpus Meum” meaning “for this is My body”.
8. Exorcism Catholic Encyclopedia
Exorcism is the practice of evicting demons or other evil spiritual entities from a person or place which they are believed to have possessed (taken control of). Solemn exorcisms, according to the Canon law of the church, can only be exercised by an ordained priest (or higher prelate), with the express permission of the local bishop, and only after a careful medical examination to exclude the possibility of mental illness. The Catholic Encyclopaedia says:
“Superstition ought not to be confounded with religion, however much their history may be interwoven, nor magic, however white it may be, with a legitimate religious rite”
During the ritual of exorcism, the priest commands the devils within the body of the afflicted to leave and uses a number of blessings with Holy Water and oils. To listen to two authentic recordings of exorcisms, visit the Top 10 Incredible Recordings. Of interesting note, the Catholic Church gave permission for a priest to appear in the film The Exorcist on the grounds that is was true to the methods used by the Church to determine whether an exorcism is warranted. A much more indepth article on exorcism including audio, videos, and images can be found here.
9. Papal Infallibility Catholic Encylopedia
Roman Catholics believe that, under certain circumstances, the pope is infallible (that is, he can not make a mistake). The Catholic Church defines three conditions under which the Pope is infallible:
I. The Pope must be making a decree on matters of faith or morals
II. The declaration must be binding on the whole Church
III. The Pope must be speaking with the full authority of the Papacy, and not in a personal capacity.
This means that when the Pope is speaking on matters of science, he can make errors (as we have seen in the past with issues such as Heliocentricity). However, when he is teaching a matter of religion and the other two conditions above are met, Catholics consider that the decree is equal to the Word of God. It can not contradict any previous declarations and it must be believed by all Catholics. Catholics believe that if a person denies any of these solemn decrees, they are committing a mortal sin – the type of sin that sends a person to hell. Here is an example of an infallible decree from the Council of Trent (under Pope Pius V):
If anyone denies that in the sacrament of the most Holy Eucharist are contained truly, really and substantially the body and blood together with the soul and divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ, and consequently the whole Christ, but says that He is in it only as in a sign, or figure or force, let him be anathema.
The last section of the final sentence “let him be anathema” is a standard phrase that normally appears at the end of an infallible statement. It means “let him be cursed”.
10. The Scapular Catholic Encyclopedia
The Scapular is a type of necklace worn by many Catholics. It is worn across the scapular bones (hence its name) and it consists of two pieces of wool connected by string. One piece of wool rests on the back while the other piece rests on the chest. When a Catholic wishes to wear the scapular, a Priest says a set of special prayers and blesses the scapular. This only occurs the first time a person wears one.
For wearing the scapular, Catholics believe that Mary, the mother of Jesus, will ensure that they do not die a horrible death (for example by fire or drowning) and that they will have access to a priest for confession and the last rites before they die. As a condition for wearing the scapular and receiving these benefits, the Catholic must say certain prayers every day. The Catholic Encyclopedia says this:
According to a pious tradition the Blessed Virgin appeared to St. Simon Stock at Cambridge, England, on Sunday, 16 July, 1251. In answer to his appeal for help for his oppressed order, she appeared to him with a scapular in her hand and said: “Take, beloved son this scapular of thy order as a badge of my confraternity and for thee and all Carmelites a special sign of grace; whoever dies in this garment, will not suffer everlasting fire. It is the sign of salvation, a safeguard in dangers, a pledge of peace and of the covenant”.
The brown scapular, known as the Scapular of Our Lady of Mount Carmel is the most commonly worn scapular, though others do exist. When the scapular is worn out it is either buried or burnt and a new one is worn in its place.






























You forgot Bingo.
To this day, whenever I am asked to play Bingo, I am forced to decline, due to the fact that I was brought up Roman Catholic and, by law, may not play with amateurs.
OK, that’s pretty much a lie. But, I remember those halycon days back at Stalag St. Edward’s, where we took our Bingo pretty darn seriously.
Some day I’ll have to tell you about my theory on the various Orders of Nuns.
RobS: haha – very amusing
But… but I was serious.
Hokay, My Theory on the Various Orders of Nuns and How it Relates to Their Innate Strictness.
“The strictness of any given nun can be measured by the length of her Order’s name. ”
For example, Franciscan Nuns are not that strict and many things can get past them, if you are a canny lad. The same can be said for Carmelites. However, The Pious Little Sisters of the Sacred Heart are feared by many for their Gestapo-like tactics when on duty as playground monitors.
The Dominicans are not only one of the less strict orders, but they are also very good at basketball, oddly enough.
This phenomenon is still being studied.
Thank you.
Rob
I was brought up Catholic and wore a scapular after my first communion. I wore it until the cord broke. I never thought it was that strange haha.
Catholics are so crooked…that list it’s the very tip of the iceberg…it just gets worse…
Leo: Most of the ones I know aren’t crooked – that is a bit rough isn’t it?
I meant Catholics as a church/organization, most Catholic people are normal-nice-happy people who have no idea what’s going on, that’s the biggest flaw is catholicism, they profess only the priesthood has the right to know and to everything and the laymen are supposed to do whatever they are told without arguing or questioning…God didn’t intend it to be that way…actually God didn’t intend many things to be the way they are…Good list though, I just found out about your blog a few days ago and I really enjoy it.
Intersting thought on the stigmata: I was once playing the role of Agnes in Agnes of God, which you may have heard of. Anyway, in the play she has the stigmata, and my drama teacher said that before cutting was as common as it is now, people in extreme emotional or mental distress would sometimes work their palms with their hands in fists and this would cause bleeding. While I’m sure this doens’t explain many cases, weren’t there some crazy people with stigmatas? Just a thought…I really know nothing about Catholic historical figures.
Leo: Thanks
I am glad you like it. One thing – the priests don’t really have any information that the laymen don’t have. There have been too many priests leave the Church for secrets to stay secret long
Any layperson curious enough can learn everything a priest learns in the seminary by buying the books himself (Aquinas, etc.)
Kelsi: there have been cases of stigmata caused by self-mutilation – they are usually very easy to detect. The ones I mentioned are not considered (even by science) to be caused by that – but by other reasons unexplained (or divine reasons according to the Church).
Ok.. to be fair, are you going to do a list of bizarre practices by Jews? Such as draining all the blood out an animal to make it kosher?
Or how about how it is ok for a Jew to lie and steal, so long as he is lying or stealing from a Gentile…
and you missed the top bizarre catholic tradition… moving *****ual predators around to different churches and protecting them, instead of kicking the bastards out and pressing charges…
sakul: the muslim and Jewish practice of draining the blood from animals before eating was not weird enough to make it to the top 10 bizarre religious traditions – there were other weird things. On the lying to a gentile thing – I included the muslim tradition of being allowed to lie to non-Muslims. And your last comment is not a Catholic doctrine – it is an abuse by members of the Church so it is not appropriate for this list.
I am extremely interested in just catholicism in general, and I’d love to read a basic book (except the bible, go figure) about it. I’ve looked, but there’s so many I don’t know where I should start.
Dan: I read a book called “The Faith of Millions” about the Catholic Church when I was young – I found it to be extremely easy reading and very informative. It appears that it is still available in print from amazon from only $1.50. I would definitely recommend it. You can get it here
there is a review on there that leads me to believe it’s totally on the side of catholicism. i’m still iffy about god, and I don’t want to hear a guy telling me it’s real, I just want the facts (no real opinion, so I can make my own) I will check it out, though. thanks.
also, i’m a bit confused with the differences between catholicism and Christianity. are they one in the same or have many differences?
retarded
Dan: I think it is on the side of Catholicism because it is by a Catholic about Catholicism
Maybe a better start would be this website. It seems to deal with the fundamentals of Catholic beliefs in a very straight up way.
As for the other part of your answer, Catholics consider themselves to be the first Christians – in fact historically they do have their roots in the apostles. There are quite a number of differences between modern Christians (normally called protestants who broke off in the 16th century) and Catholics but they are mostly doctrinal and relating to salvation. The Faith and Beliefs section of that site I posted above seems to cover some aspects of that.
This article on Wikipedia just gives the basic historical facts about Catholicism and does not really go in to beliefs too deeply.
And Catholic.com has some information and writings by very early Christians.
Hi! I just want to make a gentle correction. Catholicism began in the 3rd century during Constantine's rule. There is nowhere in the Bible that condones or promotes the ornamentation or clergy-laity that is pervasive of Catholicism. In fact, churches in the New Testament were lay-led. This, not Catholicism, is not only the first church, but it is Biblically based and backed; therefore, it also is the true church.
i feel i need to clarify something. muslims arent allowed to lie to anybody muslims or non-muslims. i dont know where u got that from. on the contrary the wierd thing is that we are not allowed to tell the whitest of lies(unless your life DIRECTLY depends on it), the existence of the tooth fairy for example or santa claus bringing gifts on christmas….even such harmless things told to kids are considered lies and thus forbidden in islam.
Shebab: Taqiyya.
Surely all Muslims want to see the conversion of all non-Muslims, which would be a “praiseworthy aim” – that would suggest you can lie to a non-Muslim if it means you will trick them in to converting – or so it seems to me anyway.
I find comfort in knowing that all who actually devote an extraordinary amount of time reading the Catechism, in a concerted effort to attack and discredit It, become the most devoted converts to Catholicism. They are the Church’s most fervent writers… that started reading the Catechism as the most fervent protest-ants. (Don’t get me started on the Crusades, the defensive wars, and the Spanish Inquisition, where the Vatican provided “defense lawyers” and prisoners in the secular prisons committed blasphemy just to get into the more humane “Catholic-prisons”.)
Kevin67: did you feel that this was an attack or attempt to discredit Catholicism? I didn’t think so – I tried very hard to state the Catholic view without putting an anti-Catholic slant on it.
JFrater – There is a German phrase (and I quote it inaccurately here) that says: “The hammer having struck the anvil – breaks.” I asked a Lutheran priest(he left the Church in order to wed – and ultimately divorce) once why the Catholic church does not defend itself as strongly as those who wish to destroy it and the German quotation was his answer. Do you know this phrase?
jfrater: Your list was very well written. In fact, I commend you on presenting the “bizarre things” quite fairly. Your detailed explanation of Papal Infallibility included things that true anti-Catholics conveniently leave out. My comments were just a statement for those that would use your facts to further their emotionally-based anti-Catholic agenda, as they intentionally confuse the humanity of the Church with the Divinity of the Church. Still, stronger qualifying statements would be appreciated to differentiate simple past practices from actual Dogma.
Magid: I don’t know it – is it referring to the Catholic Church as the anvil?
kevin67: ah I see – thanks. The only items on the list which you could say are dogmatic are infallibility, the real presence, and indulgences (indulgences stem from infallibility). The rest of the items are still practised by Catholics but as personal devotions (except exorcism of course, which is not a personal devotion but a religious ritual).
Oh, yes, jbrother, you are so so fair and don’t have a bigoted bone in your body. Actually, you begin with bigotry by the very use of the term ‘bizarre.’ And your enlightened, condescending attitude and half-knowledge just expose you the more so. A couple of things to read: The New Anti-Catholicism, the last acceptable prejudice. And How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization. But you won’t because you won’t want to give up your delicious beliefs in the Black Legends. You won’t want to know that when real, solid scholarship comes along, it does not tear down or belittle the Catholic Church, but builds it up. Why publish this list in the first place? What was your motivation? How did you envision people reacting? What did you think they’d think of you?
PatrickB: If you are so well versed in Roman Catholicism, you will know that every item on this list is real and is presented in a factual non-biased way. At no point have I said that they are bad or false. It seems that you think they should be kept secret for some reason – why? The Catholic Church does not keep secrets. Do you think the Catholic Encyclopedia believes in Black Legends? I have cited it for all but one of the items on the list. Oh – clever with the “jbrother” thing, though my surname is of German origins and not Latin.
didnt kno abt this before as it is not mentioned in the Qur’an. after doing a little research this is what i found. taqiyya is a shia concept ( which is why i dint kno abt it as i am a sunni muslim) used when shias wer being prosecuted and had to hide their religion. most sunni scholars think of it as just lying. neways taqiyya can only be carried out under the following situations: (direct copy n paste from wikipedia)
1) Taqiyah is done for safety reasons. For example, a person fears that he might be killed or harmed, if he does not observe Taqiyah. In this case, it is obligatory to observe Taqiyah.
2) Reconciliatory Taqiyah. This type of Taqiyah is done when a person intends to reconcile with the other side or when he intends to soften their hearts. This kind of Taqiyah is permissible but not obligatory.
3) Sometimes, Taqiyah may cause a more important obligation to be lost or missed, if so it is forbidden. For example, when I know that silence would cause oppression and infidelity to spread and will make people go astray, in such a situation it is not permissible to be silent and to dissimulate.
4) Sometimes, Taqiyah may lead to the death of an innocent person. If so, it is not permissible. It is therefore haram (forbidden) to kill another person to save your own life.
i really dont see what is wierd with this. and the way u say ” muslims allowed to lie to non-muslims” sounds like muslims are allowed to tell non-muslims that there is a bridge up ahead when there isnt one and the non-muslim plunges into his/her death.or i tell a non-muslim bomb squad officer to cut the red wire when he shud be cutting the black one and everything blows up in his face.this certainly isnt the case.
shabab: hey – don’t quote me out of context! If you re-read what I posted, it doesn’t say that Muslims can lie to cause harm – only that they can lie if it leads to a good outcome (though that can lead to problems as we all have different ideas of what a good outcome is). Thanks for the extra information incidentally.
Old religions are full of old practices. None of these things are so much bizarre as ridiculously dated.
AJ- The thing about religions today is that they are not supposed to change with the times, and yet they have. You can’t stop practicing part of your religion and just say “it’s old and doesn’t really apply to us”.
It shouldn’t be relative to what era you’re in. If you are going to claim a religion, you should probably claim the whole thing.
(I’m not attacking AJ by any means. Just ranting about my problems with organized religions in general.)
Wahfoolz: I would agree with you on that – if you are going to do it – do it right, don’t modify it to your own liking.
It’s a shame that people get so offendable when there is discussion about religion, although it is explainable, cuz religion is faith in the unseen. I believe people sholud always be open minded, cuz that’s the only way God spirit can make work in them.
Once when person was unbeliever, it was the open mind that allowed that person to became believer. And does God want to stop there, and make person close his mind, or He wants to further develop person?
jfrafter, by not modifying religion does that include stoning people? That’s in the Old Testament, but I’m pretty sure that got changed somewhere along the way. Some changes are good.
MadBess: yes – but the practice of stoning is still condoned by those who follow the Old Testament exclusively (Jews) as their religious literature. So it hasn’t really been changed. But yes – some changes are good – I am talking more about fundamental doctrines rather than practical matters though – they can change while doctrines should not – if a doctrine changes the entire basis of the religion is fraudulent IMHO.
Hocus Pocus was an actual magician long ago, whose name became so synonymous with magic, that it is used as “magic words” today.
Much like Houdini has been made into a verb to describe an escape. As in, “The prisoner pulled a houdini and escaped his cell.”
Mattsiah: I can find no references to a magician named “Hocus Pocus” – the closest I can find is a Norse mythological magician called Ochus Bochus.
I’ve finally read through almost all of this site, and have managed to avoid saying anything till now. Just a quick bit of help, if you want to know more about Catholicism (or most any other things)the “For Dummies” books are a great, completely unbiased source. Catholicism for Dummies has a lot of good info, and clears up a lot of misconceptions (like the prohibition against female clergy, for example). Also, “Pope Fiction” is a great, easy read to dispel some sereous anti-Papacy rumours. Oh yeah, and I’m an Evangelical Protestant, so I’m not exactly pitching the Church.
i find it so funny that when it comes to religious debates on here christians go on the defensive and put down people,,, muslims just want to clear up misconceptions and jews dont seem to be bothered at all,, says something about christians doesnt it?
Shabab- I would think lying to your Muslim kids about Santa Clause on Christmas would be a pretty bizzare tradition in and of itself.
*Claus
Stupid Tim Allen.
JFrater – Can I say, how refreshing it is to read descriptions of Catholic doctrine/practice that is presented so truthfully and objectively, without criticism or ridcule. Ok, you called them “bizarre” but I think anyone who is not a Catholic (not sure if you are or not) may be excused for thinking they might be a bit out of the ordinary. Thank you so much, you’ve made my day
teresita1897: thanks
I try very hard to be objective with my lists – sometimes I fail, but sometimes I don’t
I’m Catholic, and #’s 7, 8 & 9 are the only ones I have heard of being followed strictly. The others are either old-fashioned or used by extremists.
What about the Rosary?
Well maybe that isn’t truly bizarre.
Becca – who are these Catholic “extremists” you refer to ?
Hi jfrater
I agree with terisita1897. It is really uncommon to see a site that does not use a topic like this to flagrantly attack others who have little opportunity of defending themselves. And good job on keeping the posters honest as well!
I thought the list was informative, pretty much factual (in so much as it is a description of faith practices) and an enjoyable read.
Becca: The Pope has just issued a special plenary indulgence for all of 2008 – surely the Pope isn’t an extremist or old fashioned?
Kat: thanks – I try to be objective on all my lists
a special plenary indulgence for all of 2008
J – please explain.
Real presence is a Protestant concept. The RCs believe in Transubstantiation, Lutherans believe in Consubstantiation, and other Protestants believe in the Spiritual (or Real) Presence. Real presence is not a RC term.
Interesting list.I first heard of some of these when I read the DaVinci code a couple of years ago,and they freaked me out.Very informative as always,Jamie
I think the worst crooked religion is Islamism. Well, it really isn’t a religion. Formed by a man. Started with moon gods. Nope, I don’t think so. I have done my research. Now you must do yours.
How bizarre! How bizarre!
Objective? Funny how people try to disguise bigoted attacks on other peoples’ faiths as objective.
ProudCatholic – who is your comment about “objective” directed at? The author of the list ? If so…could you point out the bigotry that you are referring to ?
proudcatholic – give one example from this list which is not true. I have not said a single anti Catholic thing. I have quoted the Catholic Encyclopedia – in fact, it is the only reference I used for this list.
2,3,6,and 10 are rarely used anymore.
Indulgences are pretty much paying your way to get into heaven. Of course, this isn’t done anymore.
Now it’s not really done, and when PJII did in it caused great controversy.
We are often accused alot of worshipping idols, and having relics.. We don’t worship these items, yet we display them in places because we have such a history.
I agree that some aspects of catholicism are outdated and questionable.. but.. hell what religion isn’t?
Mormons wear secret underwear, various forms of christianity believe you must be “saved” to go to heaven.. which leaves the question..What about people like Ghandi? They’re going to burn in hell?
We’re never going to know all the answers.. But it’s sad when other sects of christianity hate on others ones..
We’re all equally corrupt and all in this together, through christ.
Duh.
Oh and by the way, this was well written. You said nothing anti catholic at all. I just think most readers don’t take into consideration that this was stuff we used to do ages ago.. Not your fault.
Good article.
Very good list Jfrater. Very accurate. As someone who was baptized and raised Catholic, I can tell you aren’t the least bit bigoted, as some here claim. They talk about anti-Catholic bigotry, but there’s also bigotry by Catholics against ANYONE outside the church. I’ve seen THAT a hundred times, not to mention a couple of times on this board. And don’t belive any of that rooster poop about these rituals being practiced only in the olden days. They’re still done now.
Great! Whip myself in the back to make Sado-Masacho god happy! How much do you have to despise yourself to partake in this form of self-torture?
I saw on the news, a bunch of Muslims (I believe) all chanting, and whipping their backs bloody on one of their pilgrimages…just plain dumb.
Instead of “respecting” these forms of self-hate as cultural differences, we should call it what it is:
Insanity practiced by the ignorent, the uneducated, the brainwashed.
666: rofl, i love that you misspelled ignorant. classic.
Fishchucker,
Indeed! That word is a thorn for me…a or e? they both seem right!
*****sucker,
Of course I understand why that would amuse you though, not having the means to combat content, you attack an ‘e’ instead of an ‘a’.
Like a cornered squirrel, very fierce!