Throughout time, scientist of one school or another have contributed great innovations to the world of medicine, alchemy, chemistry, physics, and more. Most of these gifts have been exceedingly useful and set the stage for even greater advances in the field. However, the coin has another side… a far more sinister and selfish side that somehow twists the very minds of the scientists making them want to do more harm than help. Granted, said scientific minds often believe that the evils that they are ultimately performing are doing good, and this is what truly makes these individuals mad. Here are ten of the most diabolical scientific minds in history.
10. Paracelsus 1493-1541
Switzerland, Paracelsus’ contributions to toxicology were based heavily in astrology and he is quite well known for offering the community a wide array of useful ideas and innovations. However, for all of his use, he also thought he might be able to create homunculi, or small humans, who stood no more than a foot or so hight and performed actions very similar to Golems. His are said to have run away after turning on their master. The homunculus creation used bits of people including semen and hair.
9. Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer 1904-1967
Heading up the Manhattan Project, the very group responsible for the creation and use of the atomic bomb, Dr. Oppenheimer was a brilliant nuclear physicist. Oppenheimer said he was “a member of just about every Communist Front organization on the West Coast,” a subscriber to the People’s World, a Communist Party organ, and, he testified, “I was associated with the Communist movement.” He claimed to be horrified by the result of the project’s work. A co-worker, Victor Weisskopf said:
He did not direct from the head office. He was intellectually and even physically present at each decisive step. He was present in the laboratory or in the seminar rooms, when a new effect was measured, when a new idea was conceived. It was not that he contributed so many ideas or suggestions; he did so sometimes, but his main influence came from something else. It was his continuous and intense presence, which produced a sense of direct participation in all of us; it created that unique atmosphere of enthusiasm and challenge that pervaded the place throughout its time.
8. Alfred Nobel 1833-1897
Discovering the use of nitroglycerine in his invention of dynamite, Nobel gave the world its first mass-produced use of deadly explosives. Killing first his own brother Emil and several others in a factory accident, the future death toll from his creation will number in the hundreds of thousands. Eventually he used his significant earned wealth to fund the yearly Nobel Prize to distract people from his invention, after reading his own obituary (mistakenly printed as he was not actually dead) which called him the “Merchant of Death”.
7. Trofim Lysenko
While his experiments did not result in mass deaths, Lysenko needs to be on this list for his utter dishonesty in the field of Science that ultimately set the Soviet Union back decades in research. Lysenko was director of the Institute of Genetics and specialized in agricultural research. Lysenko’s habit was to report only successes. His results were based on extremely small samples, inaccurate records, and the almost total absence of control groups. There can be no doubt that there has never been such an abuse of the name of science as that of Lysenko. Here is a quote:
“In order to obtain a certain result, You must want to obtain precisely that result; if you want to obtain a certain result, you will obtain it …. I need only such people as will obtain the results I need.” Lysenko
6. Dr. Jack Kevorkian 1928
Kevorkian is most noted for publicly championing a terminal patient’s right to die via physician-assisted suicide and claims to have assisted at least 130 patients to that end. Imprisoned in 1999, he served eight years out of his 10-to-25-year prison sentence for second-degree murder in the 1998 poisoning of Thomas Youk, 52, of Oakland County, Michigan. The judge that convicted him said:
“You were on bond to another judge when you committed this offense, you were not licensed to practice medicine when you committed this offense and you hadn’t been licensed for eight years. And you had the audacity to go on national television, show the world what you did and dare the legal system to stop you. Well, sir, consider yourself stopped.”
Regardless of your views on euthanasia, the fact remains that Kevorkian swore an oath to save lives, not to take them.
5. Members of the Tuskegee Study
For forty years between 1932 and 1972, the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) conducted an experiment on 399 black men (mostly impoverished and poorly educated share-croppers) in the late stages of syphilis. The essence was to gather data on the course of the disease when left untreated. The researchers understood from the outset that test subjects would provide most of their useful information in the form of autopsies, so great pains were taken to insure that subjects didn’t obtain medical care elsewhere. The program came to an abrupt halt in 1972 when its existence was made public by the Washington Star. It would be easy to dismiss this as a case of simple racism by a public institution, but that is not the case: The project was enthusiastically hosted by the Tuskeegee Institute, a historically black college, and many key researchers and staff on the project were, themselves, black.
4. Johann Konrad Dippel 1673-1734
Dippel was born at Castle Frankenstein and is rumored to be the inspiration for Shelley’s vile doctor. This is disputable, but what isn’t is the fact that this brilliant doctor performed vivisections on many recipients. Working with nitroglycerin he destroyed a tower, but also detected the medicinal use of it. It is rumored that he also preformed gruesome experiments within this tower with so called “cadavers”. Though the actual details of the experiments have never been truly confirmed it is rumored that he attempted to transfer the soul of one cadaver into another. Interestingly, his greatest contribution to the world was his animal oil (Dippel’s oil: a nitrogenous by-product of the destructive distillation manufacture of bone char) commonly known as a base product in Prussian blue – the low cost blue dye that is used to this day by artists; previously, blue dies were extremely expensive to create.
3. Dr. Sigmund Rascher 1909-1945
Rascher was a despicable scientist during the Nazi use of concentration camps during WWII. Rascher’s infamous medical experiments at the Dachau concentration camp included hypothermia research in which three hundred test subjects were used against their will (one third of them perished), in high-altitude, malaria and medication experiments. At Dachau, Rascher also developed the standard cyanide capsules, which could be easily bitten through, either deliberately or accidentally. Ironically, this became the means by which Himmler (Rascher’s friend) committed suicide.
2. Dr. Joseph Mengele 1911-1979
Mengele gained notoriety chiefly for being one of the SS physicians who supervised the selection of arriving transports of prisoners, determining who was to be killed and who was to become a forced laborer, and for performing human experiments on camp inmates, amongst whom Mengele was known as the Angel of Death. On several occasions he killed subjects simply to be able to dissect them afterwards.
1. Shirō Ishii 1892-1959
Ishii was a microbiologist and the lieutenant general of Unit 731, a biological warfare unit of the Imperial Japanese Army during the Second Sino-Japanese War. He was born in the former Shibayama Village of Sanbu District in Chiba Prefecture, and studied medicine at Kyoto Imperial University. In 1932, he began his preliminary experiments in biological warfare as a secret project for the Japanese military. In 1936, Unit 731 was formed. Ishii built a huge compound — more than 150 buildings over six square kilometers — outside the city of Harbin, China.
Some of the numerous atrocities committed by Ishii and others under his command in Unit 731 include: vivisection of living people (including pregnant women who were impregnated by the doctors), prisoners had limbs amputated and reattached to other parts of their body, some prisoners had parts of their bodies frozen and thawed to study the resulting untreated gangrene. Humans were also used as living test cases for grenades and flame throwers. Prisoners were injected with inoculations of disease, disguised as vaccinations, to study their effects. To study the effects of untreated venereal diseases, male and female prisoners were deliberately infected with syphilis and gonorrhea via rape, then studied. A complete list of these horrors can be found here.
Having been granted immunity by the American Occupation Authorities at the end of the war, Ishii never spent any time in jail for his crimes and died at the age of 67 of throat cancer.
Bonus: Daedalus
Granted he is a character of legend, but Daedalus deserves a place on any list of this type because he is probably the first recorded mad/evil scientist. Daedalus is often credited with inventing the very first labyrinth in which he imprisoned the step-son of King Minos, a minotaur. He is also, sadly, charged with killing his own son, though inadvertently, by creating Icarus and himself a set of wings used to escape his very own labyrinth. Icarus didn’t heed his father’s warnings about flying too close to the sun, thus melting his wings and plummeting to the earth.































Putting Oppenheimer, Noble and Kevorkian on this list is absurd. Lysenko also was more of a Lamarkian idiot than evil.
what about the dude who invented chemical warfare?
for number 3 did you mean hitler
Actually, the Hippocratic oath that Kevorkian and all doctors take does not pledge to save lives it says “First, do no harm”. Allowing people to choose the time of their own death and to do so with dignity and self-worth is far better than causing the harm of forcing them to stay alive as long as possible with no hope of recovery and only pain and debilitation to look forward to.
Only in a religious context can a man who attempts to ease pain, suffering, injustice and indignity (Dr. Kevorkian) be labeled “evil”. Religion and it’s fanatics invert everthing that they touch. Perverse.
Kevorkian has more integrity in his little toe than all of his detractors combined.
Scary list,You should feature old lists like this if you can Jamie, I think at least.
Regarding the Tusgkeege Experiments:
“It would be easy to dismiss this as a case of simple racism by a public institution, but that is not the case: The project was enthusiastically hosted by the Tuskeegee Institute, a historically black college, and many key researchers and staff on the project were, themselves, black.”
The fact that black people were involved in the commission of the study does not absolve it of its core racism.
The high level CDC decision makers were still White and they chose to continue funding the study despite ethical concerns.
Not saying the black doctors and researchers are free from guilt. Just that you can’t flat out say its not “racism” just cause blacks were in the mix as well.
I see this argument all the time and often it fails to take into account the “big picture”: That institutionalized racism comes from the top and affects everyone.
I’m so gutted you would put Kevorkian on this list. He is utterly misplaced here. Controversial scientists yes, but not ‘evil’.
FJ
Very funny!!! Rascher definitely does not deserve to be on the list.
Alfred nobel?
If you all don’t agree with this list so much, why don’t you go to write your own?
Interesting list. I may not agree with all of the entries, but I’m not going to complain about them here. Instead I plan on doing my own research. So thanks for sparking my interest
I 100% agree with “Fe” about Kevorkian. He was only trying to help people.
Oppenheimer is a terrible choice for this article. Many scientists were conflicted on the Manhattan project. In the end, many decided that it was the lesser of two evils to trust the bomb to the Americans instead of the Nazis. In fact, Oppenheimer was one of the scientists who signed the Szilard petition, begging Truman not to drop the bomb. It was signed by 67 of the top minds involved.
After the bomb was dropped, even Teller admitted that it was a mistake not to show Truman the petition. Oppenheimer was very concerned about the ethical consequences of nuclear weapons. The petition claimed that the spread of nuclear weapons would one day put American cities at an even greater risk than the Nazis ever did. Of course, they were right; look at what’s happening today in Iran, North Korea, Syria, etc…
To Bruno: Nuclear deterrence is NOT outdated. We surely need to consider transnational terrorist organizations as a potentially new threat not explained in the model, but you can’t forget that that’s not the only way a nuclear catasthrophe could occur in today’s world. You can’t forget the conflict between India and Pakistan, between North Korea and its neighbors, and the very serious threat arising from Iran gaining nuclear capability and blowing Israel to pieces. Now, do you really think these countries wouldn’t destroy each other if it wasn’t for nuclear deterrence? As long as nations with nuclear capabilities are in conflict, deterrence will be relevant. And for the terrorist organizations…well, that’s a tough one. It’s very possible that a nuclear core from any of the countries of the former Soviet Union might fall into terrorist hands and there’s so much we can do to stop them…a bleak prospect indeed.
Where’s Sir Francis Galton? The inventor of eugenics?
Mengele should be #1 Shipman #2
Nobel and Oppenhiemer weren’t evil
ive said this once before, (comment #62)
why is the dude that developed chemical warfare in WWI not on here?
i apologize for not giving a name but i forgot what it was
6.Dr. Jack Kevorkian
The comment “Regardless of your views on euthanasia, the fact remains that Kevorkian swore an oath to save lives, not to take them.” is incredibly trite. An oath taken at one point in a person’s past does not override convictions and personal beliefs that might develop in the future.
what about Maxim. his machine gun was the invention most responsible for the carnage in WWI. Even worse, he invented it purely for the make a money.
Dear lord! Alfred Nobel on the same list as Mengele, and Shiro Ishii? Calling Nobel evil for inventing dynamite would be the same as call Henry Ford evil for allowing the mass production of cars, or Marconi evil because the wireless paved the way for military radios and air strikes, or even Prometheus evil for bringing fire to the world.
#5. “… go on national television, show the world what you did …”
Apparently, national TV reaches the world.
That poor baby looks terrified.
Nobel invented dynamite for mining not killing. He was horified when he discovered it was being used to kill people.
Alfred Nobel’s invention of dynamite was actually intended to save lives. It replaced the much more unstable nitroglycerine that was used in mining.
The “inventor” of chemical warfare was Fritz Haber, who provided chlorine gas that the Germans used in WWI. (Ironically, he was expelled from Germany by the Nazis because he was Jewish.)
Midgley developed CFC’s as a refrigerant gas to replace ammonia and sulfur dioxide. Many people had died when their refrigeration units developed leaks. At that time, CFC’s were considered non-poisonous and extremely stable. It was decades later that CFC’s effects on the ozone layer were discovered. Since I think “evil” is based on motivation, I can’t consider Midgley evil.
just one correction: Daedaulus didn’t create the wings to escape the Labyrinth. He created them so he and his son, Icarus, could escape Crete, where King Minos was holding them against their will.
he’s not really evil, either. He warned Icarus about flying too high, or too low. The story is a metaphor for living a balanced life. And also to not ***** with nature.
heh.
Dr. Oppenheimer was not an evil scientist. If you had read ANYTHING about the man, you would know that. I’m no expert, but I just read “The Making Of The Atomic Bomb”, which profiles him well. Above all else, he wanted the atomic bomb to END war. He figured, nobody would be stupid enough to fight eachother if everyone had one.
Too bad he was wrong. But that doesn’t make him evil.
p.s., from the above mentioned book I learned that the Manhattan Project helped invent Teflon. They needed something to hold their machines together that wouldn’t interact with the plutonium, and so they created a hard, see through, very slick plastic. Oila, teflon.
You have to put Dr. Gregory Pincus who promote de contraceptive pills trials in the women of La Perla, Puerto Rico. La Perla is a very, very low income community. You can check in the web the horrible effects of the trial on them.
Being evil is when you do something that you know is wrong, with the intention of it being wrong. Oppenheimer and Noble were not evil.
I don’t think Oppenheimer or Nobel were evil, really. I also don’t think Kevorkian is evil though you may disagree with his views. I wouldn’t class him as a scientist, either.
Glad to see Ishii and Mengele here
Nobel was not evil – towards the rest of his life he deadicated all his money, to the nobel prize award where they et grants for reseach. His own resarch killed his own brother in one of his factorys
the third picture scares the living hell out of me
i totally agree with Ishii and Mengele they were crazy and the bad thing is…….. Ishii never got prosucuted or even any jail-time for all the horrible things he did. But I don’t think that Oppenheimer did this for the fun of it, they paid him to make this bomb, I think?
“The comment “Regardless of your views on euthanasia, the fact remains that Kevorkian swore an oath to save lives, not to take them.” is incredibly trite. An oath taken at one point in a person’s past does not override convictions and personal beliefs that might develop in the future.”
^I 100% agree.
If its really about the oath, I don’t see how breaking it can make someone one of the top ten most “evil scientists” ever.
So if the US president changed his mind about upholding the constitution after he has sworn an oath, it is okay for him to dump the lot and pass unconstitutional laws? I guess we might as well just dispense with oaths entirely then – and the whole thing about “honor”.
wow!!!!!never knew an ancient character in Greek mythology is cruel!!!but how come that his story is popular in children books…this give a bad lesson to children
97. jfrater
I almost fell over when I read that post about oaths not meaning anything for the future. Being a doctor means upholding that oath, otherwise you have NO right to call yourself one. I guess your example abot the US president really sums it up nicely!
PS- That baby in the Rascher really does look scared to death! Poor thing…
PPS- It seems incredible that the US would grant amnisty to people working in Area 731. It´s condoning crimes against humanity…
4. Johann Konrad Dippel 1673-1734
Working with nitroglycerin he destroyed a tower, but also detected the medicinal use of it.
That’s funny, cause I believe nitroglycerin was invented by Ascanio Sobrero, who was born in 1812, thus after Johann Konrad Dippel died…
openheimer doesn’t desrve to be here, yes he did an unspeakably bad thing by inventing the atom bomb but realised his mistake and spent the rest of his life trying to put it right. he did a bad thing but was not evil by any measure.
well done for putting shiro ishii at 1 not mengele, he was easily worse
Thanks for this enlightening blog. Howbeit I’m afraid you’re only scratching the surface here, as only time will reveal what scientists have been up to during the past few decades…
I disagree with Oppenheimer, Nobel, and Kevorkian. But I’m glad you put Ishii before Mengele. Especially because Ishii never even had to go into hiding for his crimes.
This is a good list but the picture on number 3 scared the crap out of me. You could see fear in the baby’s eyes.
I protest your use of the word “evil.” I don’t think it means what you think it means.
What is the criteria of this list? Some of the choices is really stupid. If Nobel was evil for making dynamite then Karl Benz should be evil too for making the automobile. Evevy years there are hundred thousands of people die/injured from car accidents.
If you can’t find enough evil science list, please make a shorter list. Don’t just put anyone you can think of here.
I’m sorry, I feel like, at least with Oppenheimer, Nobel, and Kevorkian–I don’t know enough about the others–this article is very biased and one-handed.
You didn’t mention the fact that one of Oppenheimer’s reasons for doing the project was he felt that the atomic bomb would be so destructive no one would ever allow it to be used (aka go to war) again. The fact that he was in “Communist circles” has very little to do with anything. It’s a political affiliation, just like Democrat, Socialist, or Republican.
Nobel didn’t have to set up a fund to reward bright minds in science, politics, and other areas that fostered or promoted peace, helping people, and generally trying to make the world better. But he did it anyway. If he was truly evil, he would have found another way to “distract” people, I’m sure. Or more appropriately for evil, probably, he wouldn’t have cared.
Kevorkian was just trying to help people die dignified–with the people themselves in control. You pointed out that he swore to save life, not end it. Call me pessimistic–but if I couldn’t do anything, was dying painfully or slowly, or couldn’t do the things I wanted to do because my body was withering right before me–I’d consider the end a -saving- grace.
—
If anything, I would consider these three people tragic characters, not evil ones.
I really hate dr. mengele he is extremely EVIL he use his power to kill innocent lives and then Dissect it… it is an Absolute inhumanity!!! what a Obnoxious character and to Nobel he only discover discover Dynamite in our own Image..
Annoyed with dr. Kevorkian
Oppenheimer, Nobel and Kevorkian in same company as Mengele?? This list is absolutely idiotic.
#106 Nelly is right. Even Einstein should be on this list based on the moronic logic used.
I see now, Oppenheimer was evil because he was Communist… Why didn’t I realise? It was barely about the bombs at all, why bother even including them?
One dependant clause about the bombs, but one complex sentence about him being a Communist? A bit paranoid still, the Cold War’s over, we won…
is this real or fake
scientist are not evil! they are only good! thats the evil christian way of thinking of it!
i dont care if they killed babies, rape people or torcher people, if its in the name of science it must be ok.
I disagree with Oppenheimer, he shouldn’t be on this list at all. He was a pretty interesting guy, and if you about his life post nuclear bomb, he was essentially leading the fight to stop any development of the H bomb. He was destroyed by the government for this, essentially destroying his credibility. Also, he did not advocate for the USE of the bomb, creating the bomb was a necessary political move, using it not so much.
Kevorkian shouldn’t be on here. A doctor’s job shouldn’t be to save lives, it should be to attempt to make someone’s quality of life better. If he can’t and that patient wants to die rather than endure days, months, or even years of suffering, he should help them do so. If you keep that person around while they suffer like that, you are extraordinarily selfish. Even if you don’t agree with my view, Kevorkian is far from ‘evil.’ Controversial perhaps, but not evil. Not by a long shot.
Nobel created nitro for the mining industry. The use of nitro as explosives for armaments did not come from Nobel any more than the use of gunpowder as an explosive came from the Chinese. To paint him as an “evil scientist” is a bit of a stretch. Nitro had many non-military uses which greatly benefited mankind.
Nobel’s evil? Really now…I recall reading about him in school achieving the Nobel Prize (well…yeah) and that his invention of dynamite was for good purposes, but he didn’t realize it became a deadly weapon for war and such things.
Man, I’m shocked of what they had done. And I can’t believe they would also invent those bad stuff. They deserve to go to hell.
only 5 – 1 are evil at all. this list sucks
Nobel did no evil, and what is this about his creation killed people over time.
The author of this thing must be kinda stupid, since dynamite is not used for warefare, and nitroglycerin was invented decades before. Half of the people you have on the list was never evil or will nor be called it by history.
Should for example the inventor or mathematics be called evil since economy has killed more people than any other science.(economics is the foundation of having religion by those who preach it)
Half of the people on this list are not evil nor mad. The author on the other hand is a retard and probably mad.
By far the biggest *****up by the author is to put Alfred Nobel on the list. Nobel was a pacifist and the dynamite was an improvement over the extremely dangerous nitroglycerin that, as mentioned before, was used in the mining industry. There was never a thought from the inventor to use dynamite as a weapon. Nobel was horrified when he heard that his invention was used to harm people, thats why he made up the Nobel Peace Prize; ever heard of that one?