Conflict and opposition have been a common trait of the human experience throughout history. Some rivalries come and go, but some rivalries have become so inherent to our lives that no one can deny their influence on the modern world. Even if some rivalries seem petty and unimportant, they secretly represent a much deeper conflict that may occur in our world and sometimes within ourselves. This list of the Top 10 ultimate rivalries reminds us of a world in black and white, where conflicts are much simpler and innocent; when in reality we live in a complex and chaotic world, tinted in many shades of gray.
Spy vs. Spy is a silent comic strip created by Antonio Prohias and published in Mad Magazine from 1961 to this day. In the strip, two spies known only as White and Black, are constantly in a battle of deception to steal the other side’s secret plans while at the same time setting up intricate traps to kill each other. Just when it seems that one of them will be falling into a lethal death trap the other one lay out, the trap is ingeniously backfired by the first, and the other spy is comically killed while the first spy escapes with a mischievous smile and doing the v sign with both hands. In a few occasions, a third, female spy known as Lady in Grey is involved, and always ends up besting both Black and White, mostly due to them being helplessly in love with her.
Prohias, whose name appears in every strip in Morse code, and who fled from Cuba just before Castro took over the free press, considered himself a spy of sorts, and drew the cartoon as a satire of the Cold War and a criticism of its pointlessness. By 1990, health complications impeded his work on the strip, and other editors of MAD took over the task. Prohias passed away on February 24, 1998. Spy vs. Spy is possibly the longest running feature in MAD magazine, and the hilarious battles of wit between Black and White are still ongoing in the pages of the satirical magazine.
The two biggest cola brands in the world, Coca-Cola and Pepsi, have almost always been in direct competition, as they have both risen to global fame and have come to be hugely popular in all corners of the world. The immense popularity of both carbonated beverages has led to many a battle for the preference of the public in what has come to be known as the Cola Wars. What began as a struggle to strive in the American soft drink market, within a century became a global battle for cola domination in almost every nation of the world. During most part of the 20th century, both beverages rose to fame almost shoulder to shoulder, with no apparent winner.
But the ‘conflict’ escalated when Pepsi unveiled its “Pepsi Challenge”, where people were given a taste test of two unlabeled cola cans, and most of them turned out to prefer the can containing Pepsi. As a response, Coca Cola concocted a new formula for their beverage and released it as the “New Coke”. This new Coke was quite unpopular among the public, and Coca Cola quickly returned to its old formula, calling it “Coca Cola Classic”. After this, both companies have undertaken fierce advertising campaigns aimed mostly at a teenage audience, trying to one-up their rival in the global cola market through catchy slogans, different flavors and spin-offs, and celebrity spokespersons. Although Coca Cola dominates the market overall, Pepsi still possesses several bastions of popularity around the world, and is hot on the heels of its rival of this 100-year+ conflict.
If you want the ultimate conflict within the almighty geek populace, spanning several decades of shaping and reshaping pop culture as we know it, and bringing war to space and cyberspace alike, yet with no apparent winner to be found, then you need to look no further than the “Star Wars vs. Star Trek” debate. Each of these powerful franchises have defined the genre of Science Fiction across the media industry through TV shows, major feature films, spin-off books, video games, conventions, and toys. As a result, seemingly endless battalions of die-hard fans of each franchise have taken it to themselves to defend their obsessions by lashing out against their sci-fi counterparts at conventions and internet chat rooms.
Although both franchises have several similarities which roughly unite them within the Science Fiction genre, such as laying out an entire galaxy teeming with alien species ready to battle each other in outer space with cool spaceships and other futuristic technologies, they can also be considered completely different and opposing when it comes to thematic undertones and philosophies, among many other things that fans are able to rant incessantly about. No matter how many words are posted in message boards about the subject, no matter how many fanfiction crossover stories may be written; this battle for the supremacy of sci-fi may never see a true resolution.

The impact of the advent of computers onto the modern world is undeniable. And on the forefront of this revolution were two particular businesses which started small, but dreamt big, and became the most important computer corporations in the world. By the early 80′s, Apple Computer, founded by Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, was already enjoying success from its innovative series of “Apple” computers, while Microsoft, founded by Bill Gates and Paul Allen, was just releasing its first operating system (or OS). But after getting a contract with IBM, Microsoft released its DOS series of operating systems and experienced a rise in the industry as it began to dominate the market through DOS and several software products aimed for businesses. Apple acknowledged the presence of Microsoft, and in 1984 launched a major advertising campaign for its new Macintosh computer. The success of the Macintosh was limited, and Microsoft on the other hand kept on the rise with its several forays into the computing market, and especially its new Windows series. By 1993 Microsoft already dominated the market while the Apple industry started to struggle. During the 90′s Apple was on such a slump that it had to cut deals with both IBM and Microsoft to release joint products in an attempt to recover. Microsoft and its Windows OS series became synonymous with Personal Computers, while Apple became the less popular alternative.
By the turn of the new millennium Apple experienced a revival of its brand through the introduction of the iMac and other products sharing a new, fresh, streamlined style of computers. But it wasn’t until the release of the iPod that Apple was back again on top of the world. The huge success of the iPod popularized the new Apple style, and the iMac computers would rise in popularity as a result. Nowadays, Apple’s ‘fresh’ and ‘young’ style has come to directly antagonize the more ‘traditional’ style of Microsoft, as depicted by the ‘Mac vs. PC’ series of ads. Although Microsoft still dominates the PC industry, Apple has an undeniable influence over modern electronics through the iPod and its more recent iPhone, which have once again made Apple a worthy contender against the Microsoft empire.
Although they are not predator and prey, dogs and cats could nevertheless be considered the most famous “natural enemies” on the planet. Since the dawn of civilization, both canines and felines have held a place of privilege within the cities and homes of mankind; and as such, they have inevitably come to face each other in an ultimate battle for man’s fondness.
This rivalry becomes more intense when we consider that they have seemingly opposing traits (even if this is true mostly as a stereotype): one is sly and cunning, while the other is brawny and brash; one acts like a loner who demands man’s attentions, and the other glows with friendliness towards its master. Whatever your predilection, dogs and cats will continue to resent each other as long as there are human homes to contest and back alleys to claim.
What makes us who we are? Is it a lifetime of nurturing and experiences, or were we predestined by our genes to become who we are today? Is our behavior defined by biological imperatives, or do we have some say in what we eventually become in life? How important are my genes in defining my life as opposed to the way I was raised? All these questions seek to find a solution to the “nature vs. nurture” debate. Some think that genetics and biology are quite irrelevant when it comes to defining your personality, and we are basically a blank slate (“tabula rasa”) ready to be shaped into whatever kind of individual our parents and society wants us to be. Yet others emphasize the importance of heredity and genetics in defining people, since it is through those traits inherited from our parents that we become predisposed to certain behaviors and characteristics. Genes could be the primary trigger which defines our propensity to be intelligent, to be fat, to smoke, to be an athlete, to be bitter, to like rock music or classical music, etc.; in short, since the moment we are born, we would be predestined to be who we are.
But, the environment may also play an important role when it comes to those genes actually ‘expressing’ themselves in our lives; so even if genes have an important role in defining our personality, so would the way we are raised and our experiences in life. Genetics and behavioral sciences have come to make the subject very complex and fill it with even more questions about the nature of humanity.

This evident and very significant rivalry could be presented as stemming from the most basic dichotomy in nature, where the biological need for harmony between the male and the female for the purpose of survival contrasts with the usually radical differences between the genders. It could also be presented as an undeniable element in the history of human life, where women have needed to struggle through the ages against the social and cultural injustices of a seemingly male-dominated culture.
I prefer to present this conflict in terms of how kids have defined their reasons for enmity and bitter war against each other: girls have cooties, and boys are gross. Simple, huh?
The rivalry between the so-called Eastern and Western cultures is a very complex and extensive subject, spanning many centuries of history, and deeply defining human civilization up until modern times. Throughout the ages, this conflict has taken many shades and names, with religious and political struggles occurring. Defining the East and the West in itself is difficult, since it is not at all a purely geographical condition. But there’s no denying that several major wars and events in world history have happened directly from the opposition between the two. Arguably, religion and political ideologies are the two most important traits used to define this opposition, but these characteristics become evident only by observing the societies that have been established within each; or in other words, the way human beings have embraced and expressed their lives as a product of living in those cultures of the world.
This rivalry is quite evident in modern times, where the current major global wars taking place can be considered a struggle between the cultures of the East and the West. But at the same time, thankfully, an important process of global integration and diffusion of information is taking place, through the use of modern communications, as well as an increased interest for foreign cultures all over the world. Hopefully, this process will bring forth a much needed understanding of other cultures which are not our own, and help us appreciate the differences between our cultures; helping us perceive, through those very differences, what we all have in common as human beings.

One of the most relevant conflicts that define the very nature of our humanity is the constant struggle between our reason and our emotions. Many philosophical works have been written through the centuries trying to discern how these two aspects of our mind come into play to define human thinking. Yet, as of today, we still know very little about the way our mind works. If reason is the logical use of our mental faculties, something that is arguably exclusive to humans, then it is thanks to this aspect that we have developed as a superior species and have erected our grand civilization throughout time. But it would be foolish to limit human thinking and acting as only out of rationalization, because emotions constantly play a big part in the way we act. So, if emotion is a more primordial aspect of our minds, then how could we claim to be rational beings? What if you’re driven by your emotions? What if you’re too cold and rational about life? How could we find a true understanding of our minds without falling to the whims of one aspect or the other?
This antagonism is actually deeper than it seems, because it is thanks to this conflict that we have come to wonder about more mystifying aspects of life. What is love? Is it a completely emotional and biological process, or does something else, such as reason, come into play when we decide to be with someone for the rest of our lives? Is religion an emotional urge of some sort, or is it derived from our reasoning of something which may exist beyond us? What are the limits of the power of the mind as it perceives and shapes reality? What is ‘real’? Does the soul exist? What is God? Are we really able to answer these questions when we know so little about how our very minds work? Scientists, philosophers, priests, and even you and I are looking for answers to these questions, and as long as they remain unanswered, our reason and our emotion will keep on struggling in order to find the answers.
The ultimate rivalry is as old as time itself, and has been known by many names throughout the ages: Yin vs. Yang, light vs. darkness, creation vs. destruction, order vs. chaos, God vs. the Devil… Since antiquity, human beings have been involved in this eternal battle. In just about every story ever written you’ll find this struggle between good and evil, whether literally or symbolically. The presence of good and evil in humanity is not at all straightforward, for example: justice, an eye for an eye, conscience and lack thereof, pure evil, survival of the fittest, religion, politics, etc. etc.
Ethics and morality have been used to try to define what is inherently good and evil. Many philosophers have tried to explain the nature of evil and the nature of good. All religions explain the reasons and justifications for good and evil acts in their own way. There are daily acts of goodness as well as daily acts of wickedness throughout the world. Although it seems like the most basic of rivalries, it is, in fact, the most important conflict that humanity has ever seen. Shouldn’t all of us be concerned about knowing if what we are doing is for our own benefit only, or is actually helping others’ lives as well? Shouldn’t we place the welfare of others before our own? Shouldn’t we all make certain that our actions are bringing either good or bad to the world? Despite all the confusion, it should be imperative for everyone to understand whether what they are doing with their lives is selfish and harmful to others, or if what they do every day is making the world a better place for everyone on it.
What side are you on?
Notable omission: Kasparov vs. Deep Blue
Contributor: kreachure



























7 Microsoft vs. Apple. For me, not hard.
I started on an apple in 1983 or 84, and just stayed with the brand. They handle graphics better than Microsoft, and since much of what I use a computer for is graphics related, Macintosh is the best choice for me.
My husband, who keeps our business’ books, uses a Dell, but is considering switching to the new Mac Leopard, which has both platforms, thereby eliminating the need for choice.
Both of my machines can be upgraded to Leopard, from Tiger.
Excellent list kreachure! There’s so many possibilities out there for this list, and I think you did a great job of selecting them. Glad you left off sports rivalries, that could be a list of it’s own.
Very interesting list.
a few more rivalries:
Lakers vs Celtics
Chevy vs Ford
Ali vs Frazier
Democrat vs Republican (similar to Good vs Evil)- just kidding
Rivalries denotes a more personal relationship between two (or more) opposing sides (be they teams, clans, societies, governments, etc.). This list went all over the place with regard to the use of ‘rivalry’ in context. Not to say the list wasn’t an interesting read. I simply think it could have held more truly to the classic use of the term, and avoided the ideological/metaphorical bent that makes this list a bit jumbled and incohesive.
My personal thouhts on the above list, on a lighter note:
Spy go boom!
No Coke; Pepsi!
He who warps fastest gets to bend the rules.
Tiny rotten fruit.
It aint rainin’ until there are cats and dogs!
It’s only natural to be nurturing…
Without boys and girls there would be no girls and boys.
If you go far enough east, you’re west!
I find that I’m a reasonably emotional person.
Ah, it’s good to be evil!
nice list.
what about cats VS mice.
dogs and cats could be friends but not mice and cats.
hehehe.
I think there is good and there is evil. you can even weigh things using your conscience..unless you don’t have it..
if there is positive there is negative.
if there is optimism there is pessimism.
Soc’s vs Greasers
Shirts vs. Skins.
These thoughtful debates remind me of why I hate being smart.
I could enthrall a date debating the merits of Nature vs. Nurture, tying in the debates of Reason vs. Emotion and (inevitably) Good vs. Evil. Among the most open-minded of us, we can only conclude that the answer is not clear cut, and that everything is a certain Shade of Grey.
But when I say that Star Trek is DEFINITELY better than Star Wars… well that ruins the date. MAN! I hate being smart!
Where are the Hatfields and McCoys??? Great list.
few others Palestine – Israel, Clash – ***** Pistols, Ali – Cosell, Letterman – Leno, Morality – Temptation, Rock = Paper – Scissors, Kirk – Picard
I always thought that good and evil were circumstantial view points. Both of which rely heavily on what was taught to on either side children. In Nazi Germany, for example, the German were taught from birth that they were genetically superior to everyone else, and from their point of view they were only doing what they thought was right. I’m not saying Nazi’s are good, just that they believed what they were doing was right. I , in no way, condone being a Nazi.
fantastic and original list.
although I remember hearing that coca cola owns a company that owns Pepsi, anyone know about this?
There used to be:
Kodak vs. Polaroid – I think Polaroid is gone now.
Potatoes vs. StoveTop Stuffing – but that was just an old commercial
Domingo (131) – it was the ‘Arian’ race that was supposedly superior among races, not the Nazi’s, who were members of the Nazi party. Just clarifying….
GREAT LIST… CONGRATS
gargamel vs smurfs
Ooo i know!
Holdens vs Fords! *cough* HOLDENS *cough*
Jap cars vs European
Simpsons vs Family Guy
Mince and Cheese pie vs Steak and Cheese pie.. mmm pie…
Macdonalds vs Birger King (like the BK ad that had little Buffy the vampier slayer in it and Mcdonalds banned her..)
134. JayArr…it was the ‘Arian’ race…
****
It’s spelled Aryan in this instance.
There is an Arian, but it refers to the followers of Arius, who lived and taught in Alexandria, Egypt, in the early 4th century. He was basically known as a nontrinitarian, that is, he didn’t believe in the “Holy Trinity”, which got him into a lot of trouble with the Holy Roman Church.
Where’s Luke skywalker vs. Darth Vader??
Jon: fighting it out on a spaceship somewhere?
Curse the spelling errors…. some days I’m an ‘airyann’
#140. JayArr
Curse the spelling errors…. some days I’m an ‘airyann’
****
lol JayArr, I really should be the last person on earth to point out a spelling error.
Last night I was writing my oldest daughter an email, and at the end, apparently, my bedtime meds hit me like a sledge-hammer! The last 3 words were pure gobbledygook! Even I can’t tell what they were supposed to be.
Typo be thy name.
Amen
Hruary for splelnig erorrs! I always hate it when I fire off a memo to my team or division director that includes typos – I embarrass myself despite myself sometimes.
142. JayArr
I always hate it when I fire off a memo to my team or division director
****
What kind of team?
rushfan (126) Greasers definitely. Hands down and away. I loved that book. Read it to pieces 3 times.I had to get a new copy each time the binding finally fell apart.
Pony Boy, Johnny, Soda Pop, Two Bit, Dally, Darry. I would love to have my way with any of them. (Not the movie actors, but if they were real people). Except maybe Two-Bit.
i guess you can never tell how those that wish to reply in type will take form or flight. Here for instance, I think its a shame that some of the ideas and thoughts you have brought up in you list haven’t been discussed at all really..and definately not by the grand zealous commentors that suck on this site like a bunch of hungry calfs at times (and thats not an insult). This is perhaps the way things are, as some ideas may best be left to read and think about outside of the debator’s claw shadow.
For instance, “#2 Reason vs. Emotion” is beautifully written and expressed. I can read it again and again, as i have and still think of something new or different than before. Hanging on to the flow of thoughts and to create an image or recognized a voice, a familiar touch.
The mind as the last frontier.
I tread lightly, scared and cautious about the steps I take. the questions asked are connected to an ultra sensitive machine, where the needle or the tremor, the breeze or synapse..snap…crack….
ah whatever.
real nice list dude!
I dig it!
oops,
“The sum of the square roots of any two sides of an isosceles triangle is equal to the square root of the remaining side”.
that’s what i meant.
diogenes (146) Huh? If I have an isosceles triangle with a 10 10 14 dimension, the sum of the square roots is not the length of the third side. Give me an example.
Vera – i think he’s confused himself and you at the same time, but yes he is incorrect, fistly he went with square roots and not the singular and 10 10 14, how can the square root of the 14 be equal to the whole of 10 10, it cant be correct.
Note: i aint no mathematician but it just dont LOOK right, sorry diogenes.
scarecrow.
oz!
my joke
Vera ~ Glad to hear from you! Hope you’re doing well. I personally *love* the movie. It was a huge part of my childhood and I will love Tom Howell forever.
I find myself saying lines from that movie all the time, not even caring if people know. Lately I keep saying “that don’ bother me none” in my best Matt Dillon voice, from the scene where he picks up Johnny and Ponyboy from the church and they go get burgers and Johnny asks if his parents have asked about him. I’m sure you know…anyway, I love that movie. It’s a classic for sure.
p.s
subtract the “d*ldo” , my mistake..(moniker from the last dum mistake)
and the joke backfires.
i hear the “ta dah..dah…. tisssssss” of the drum and highhat
anyway
the scarecrow is still the scarecrow
even with a new brain, he doesn’t quite make sense
not right off the bat anyhow.
rushran (150) You never read the book??!! You must. Really. Trust me on this. If you liked the movie(It sucked) you have to read the book. By S.E. Hinton. A girl of 17.Please Please Please. You wont regret it. I promise. It’s 150 pages or so.
I didn’t know it was by a girl. That’s awesome. I had a cousin growing up who read and re-read the book like you.
I’ll definitely grab a copy.
Mario vs Bowser?
I like the picture reference to bucky and satchel from get fuzzy….:)
Segue(143) – systems developers
rushfan (153) I think her name was Sue Ellen. They thought that it (the book) wouldn’t sell or it would be dismissed as not genuine so they hid the fact that it was written by a girl. Interesting. I had to read it in 6th grade. Devoured it. I think I read it about ten times in a row. Back to back.
you forgot to mention the most important rivalry of the modern world whch is capitalism vs socialism. thanx
actually, its a right triangle that follows the formula:
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
The square of the hypotenuse (c) is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides (a and b)
salt v. pepper
butter v. margarine
silicon v. natural
soup v. salad
My answers:
spy (there are no other choices)
coke (I prefer it over Pepsi)
Star Wars (It’s cooler than Star Trek and less nerdy)
Microsoft (I use it)
cats (I think they’re cuter, well in exception to the shih zhou dog)
nurture (life is what you make of it)
equal (I’m a feminist yet I’m a guy)
east (I’m from the Philippines, a country in the east)
reason (come to think about it, most crimes and evil are from the grasps of emotion, especially those of revenge. It roots from human failure to reason)
equal (whether you believe me or not, there is a good reason why evil exists. I do believe that if God ever exists, he must have bended over the power of evil. Evil brings momentarily pleasure but ends up in eternal anguish. The good’s task is now to find the window of opportunity opened up by evil to succeed in life. Notable example of this profound thought is Dave Pelzer. I have finally regained my faith when my religion teacher told me that the Bible is not to be taken literally.)
More…
lust and love
man chauvinist and feminist
pink and blue
Nickelodeon and Disney Channel
Discovery Channel and National Geographic
conservative and liberal
*ABS-CBN and GMA (Philippine channels, you won’t get this if you’re not Pinoy)*
republican and capitalist
Christianity and Islam
McDonald’s and KFC
Shakey’s and Yellow Cab
coffee and tea
Lola and Virginia
Derek and KC (Life with Derek)
idealism and realism
optimism and pessimism
emo/punk/goth and little miss/mister sunshine
jock and nerd
hedonism and self-denial
whites and blacks (races)
justice and mercy
let-go-and-learn and protection (how parents treat their children)
movies and books
tradition and innovation
religion and science
art and math
Krusty Krab and Chum Bucket
ice cream and milkshake
similarity and contrast
tall and short
maximalist and minimalist
revealing and modest
creation and evolution
believe and verify
sand castle making and snowman sculpting
fairy princess and grim reaper
Jupiter, Zeus, and Odin
hand drawing and computerized graphic designing
caveman and robot
socialite and loner
and a lot more! there are infinite numbers of rivalries and conflicts throughout everywhere.
oh, and I forgot…
rock vs mellow (song types)
great taste v less filling
You left the biggest rivalry in the history of the world…and very well the universe..wheres the Yankees vs Redsox rivalry?
Wrong v. Right?
You ever noticed Coca-Cola is red, while Pepsi’s blue. That’s the same colors as the two rival gangs (bloods and crypts)! That’s just strange…
Cowboys – Redskins are the biggest rivals in sports, tied with Sox-Yankees (and only tied because of the late resurgence of the Boston Redsox).
You put in two inanimate soda flavors, and not thousands upon thousands of men that have given more than their normal all against the villain of their franchises?
What about Rebulicans – Democrats? Fantasy series vs real world consequences. This list is just @#$%ing retarded.
Hmm.
I was certain i would see France VS England
A sports rivalry thread would see no end of controversy.
American sports rivalries – even Cowboys-Redskins and Red Sox-Yankees – pale in comparison to, say, Rangers-Celtic, Liverpool-Manchester United, Tottenham Hotspur-Arsenal, Real Madrid-Barcelona, Inter-Milan, etc…
Chances of being killed due to sports rivalry-related violence are greater in Europe too, I believe.
Number 1 is inaccurate at best. To have a rivalry the two sides have to be relatively equal in strength and ability. The Raiders vs the Giants (two NFL teams) in 2008 cannot be rivals because one is so much more dominant than the other. Whether it be the actions of a human being or the quality of negative vs positive emotions there is no rivalry. The biggest faux pas on the list is that God somehow has a rivalry with the Devil? Like there is some kind of equality in power there?
I am not complaining, I have come to expect such ignorance from the people who compile these lists along with the obvious bigoted anti-religion sentiment.
how about the red sox and yankees
Great list! Long time reader, first time commenting. There is some more rivalries, Conservative verses Liberal. When discussions of these topics occur, heated arguments often follows (The TV show “The View” for example). Other rivalries include Ford vs. Chevy and might as well be New York City vs. Boston since these cities tend to rival each other in everything
5. tis not all black and white, we can all be products of nature and nurture!!
If this “red sox and yankees” rivalry is so big, then why have I never heard of it. Also if you include them you must include the two Milan’s (AC and Inter). They regularly attack each other on the streets.
Also here’s my assessment of the top ten included
10. White (don’t like black looks evil)
9. Coke
8. Star Wars
7. Microsoft
6. Cats (Dogs look more violent)
5. Nurture
4. Equal (I believe neither is better than the other)
3. West (Just seems more civilized)
2. Reason
1. Good
Notable exceptions
Right vs. Left
Religion vs. Science
Police vs. Criminals
PC:
“If this “red sox and yankees” rivalry is so big, then why have I never heard of it.” (sic)
Because your primary residence must be under some sort of large outcropping of what we call “rock”?
The Boston Red Sox are well-known bums. The New York Yankees, of course, are America’s team. This is the way god intended it and the way it shall always be, no matter a fluke World Series win here and there by the Sox.
As far as I’m aware I’m not under a rock. Unless England is a rock and also just because everyone in America or maybe even just your area has heard of it doesn’t make it a rivalry to challenge major ones like good v evil or left v right. Its sport it’s not meant to be taken seriously. Take a chill pill the lot of you.
Jessy (107) I am also from Ottawa and I know for sure that the Montreal Canadiens – Toronto Maple Leafs rivalry is more serious than any other “rivalry” in Canada.
But nowadays, it seems like it is Montreal against every other team in Canada. “The West hates Quebec, Quebec hates the West, and we all hate Toronto!”
178. gatineau:…Montreal Canadiens – Toronto Maple Leafs…
****
gatineau, I have been wondering about this for a long, long time, and I hope you will be able to help me with the answer.
Why is the name of the team The Maple Leafs, instead of the more grammatically correct The Maple Leaves?
I know that’s nit-picky at it’s ultimate, but it just make me wonder, that’s all.
Segue
The Maple Leafs say that the name was chosen in honour of the Maple Leaf Regiment from World War I. As the regiment is a proper noun, its plural is formed by adding a simple ‘s’ creating Maple Leafs (not *Maple Leaves).