The identity of Jack the Ripper is probably the most famous unsolved crime in history. With the horror and the history surrounding the events, it has become an increasingly popular topic in recent years with many new suspects being put forth. This list looks at 10 of the most interesting suspects – some considered by the police at the time, and others recently suggested.
Carroll, author of Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass, was named as a suspect based upon anagrams which author Richard Wallace devised for his book Jack the Ripper, Light-Hearted Friend. This claim is not generally taken seriously by other scholars. Wallace posited that Carroll was assisted in the crimes by his friend Thomas Vere Bayne. This theory was based primarily on a number of anagrams derived from passages in two of Carroll’s works, The Nursery Alice, an adaptation of Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland for younger readers, and from the first volume of Sylvie and Bruno. Wallace claimed that the books contained hidden but detailed descriptions of the murders. This theory gained enough attention to make Carroll a late but notable addition to the list of suspects, although one that is generally not taken very seriously. It should be noted that Carroll was very interested in word tricks and this certainly gives a little more weight to the theory.
Prince Albert Victor, Duke of Clarence and Avondale (8 January 1864 – 14 January 1892) was first mentioned in print as a potential suspect in 1962 when author Philippe Jullian published a biography of his father, Edward VII of the United Kingdom. Jullian made a passing reference to rumours that Albert Victor might have been responsible for the murders. Though Jullian made no reference to the date when the rumour first started and did not detail his source, it is possible that the rumour derived indirectly from Dr. Thomas E. A. Stowell. The theory was brought to major public attention in 1970 when Stowell published an article in The Criminologist which revealed his suspicion that Prince Albert Victor had committed the murders after being driven mad by syphilis. The suggestion was widely dismissed as Albert Victor had strong alibis for the murders, and it is unlikely that he suffered from syphilis.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and William Stewart advanced theories involving a female murderer dubbed “Jill the Ripper.” Supporters of this theory believe that the murderer worked, or posed, as a midwife. She could be seen with bloody clothes without attracting unwanted attention and suspicion and would be more easily trusted by the victims than a man. A suspect suggested as fitting this profile is Mary Pearcey, who in October 1890, killed her lover’s wife and child, though there is no indication she was ever a midwife. E. J. Wagner, in The Science of Sherlock Holmes, offers in passing another possible suspect, Constance Kent, who had served 20 years for the murder of her younger brother at the age of sixteen. There is some inconclusive DNA evidence taken from the letters sent to the police – this evidence does not rule out the possibility of the killer being a woman.
Cream was a doctor secretly specializing in abortions. He was born in Scotland, educated in London, active in Canada and later in Chicago, Illinois. In 1881 he was found to be responsible for fatally poisoning several of his patients of both sexes. Originally there was no suspicion of murder in these cases, but Cream himself demanded an examination of the bodies, apparently an attempt to draw attention to himself. Imprisoned in the Illinois State Penitentiary in Joliet, Illinois, he was released on 31 July 1891, on good behaviour. Moving to London, he resumed killing and was soon arrested. He was hanged on 15 November 1892. According to some sources, his last words were reported as being “I am Jack…”, interpreted to mean Jack the Ripper. He was still imprisoned at the time of the Ripper murders, but some authors have suggested that he could have bribed officials and left the prison before his official release, or that he left a look-alike to serve the prison term in his place.
Francis Tumblety was a seemingly uneducated or self-educated Irish-American raised from an infant in Rochester, New York, where he ostensibly trained as a homeopathic physician at Hahneman Hospital. He earned a small fortune posing as a quack “Indian Herb” doctor throughout the United States and Canada, and occasionally travelling across Europe as well. Tumblety was in England in 1888 and had visited the country on other occasions; during one such earlier trip he became closely acquainted with Victorian writer Thomas Henry Hall Caine, with whom it was suggested he had an affair and from whom he tried to borrow money. He claimed to have treated many famous English patients, including Charles Dickens, for a variety of illnesses. He was arrested on 7 November 1888, on charges of “gross indecency”, apparently for engaging in homosexuality. Notorious in the United States for his scams, including selling forged Union military discharge papers during the American Civil War and impersonating an army officer, news of his arrest led some to suggest he was the Ripper.

Kominski was a member of London’s Polish Jewish population. He worked in London as a hairdresser, but he was born in Kłodawa. He was certified insane and admitted to Colney Hatch Lunatic Asylum in February 1891. He was named as a suspect in Chief Constable Melville Macnaghten’s memoranda, which stated that there were strong reasons for suspecting him, that he “had a great hatred of women, with strong homicidal tendencies”, and that he strongly resembled “the man seen by a City PC” near Mitre Square. Aaron Kosminski meets some of the criteria in the general profile of serial killers as outlined by Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) criminal profiler John Douglas and Robert Ressler. He also lived within a mile of the sites of the murders.
In November 2008, a newspaper reported that files released from Broadmoor high security hospital indicate that Thomas Hayne Cutbush may have been responsible for the murders, which ceased from the time of his detention. Cutbush was sent to Lambeth Infirmary in 1891 suffering delusions thought to have been caused by syphilis. After stabbing one woman and attempting to stab a second he was pronounced insane and committed to Broadmoor that same year, where he remained until his death in 1903. The paper also reported that Cutbush was the nephew of a Scotland Yard superintendent, and speculated that this may have led to a cover-up of the killer’s identity. The idea that Cutbush was the Ripper was first raised by newspapers shortly after his arrest.
Gull was physician-in-ordinary to Queen Victoria. He was named as the Ripper as part of the evolution of the masonic/royal conspiracy theory. Thanks to the popularity of this theory among fiction writers and for its dramatic nature, Gull shows up as the Ripper in a number of books and films (including a 1988 TV film Jack the Ripper starring Michael Caine and the graphic novel From Hell written by Alan Moore). It is just possible that Gull’s “candidacy” as a Ripper suspect is due to an odd item connected to his career. In April 1876 Gull was one of the physicians called to “the Priory”, the home of the barrister Charles Bravo when he was poisoned. Gull (like the other physicians) did what he could do, but he was hampered in not knowing the nature of the poison involved. His bedside manner on this occasion, even given the horror of speeding events or sheer desperation, were hardly conducive to easing the dying man’s mind. Gull would testify at the massively covered coroner’s proceedings that summer, and insist it was suicide.
Chapman was born Seweryn Kłosowski in Poland, but went to the United Kingdom sometime between 1887 and 1888, later (c. 1893/94) assuming the name of Chapman (no relation to Annie Chapman, one of the victims). Without question a duplicitous and cold character who undertook several aliases, he was guilty of successively poisoning three of his wives, crimes for which he was hanged in 1903. He lived in Whitechapel, London, at the time of the killings where he had been working as a barber since arriving in England. He was at one time the favored suspect and is considered by many modern commentators to be the most likely killer. Chapman is supposed by some to have had the medical skills necessary to commit the mutilations (although the level of skill evidenced by the Ripper is a matter of debate, and divided medical opinions at the time). However, the main argument against him is the fact that he murdered his three wives with poison, and it is uncommon (though not unheard of) for a serial killer to make such a drastic change in modus operandi.
Druitt was born in Wimborne Minster, Dorset, England, the son of a prominent local physician. He was educated at Winchester College and New College Oxford. He graduated from Oxford in 1880 and two years later was admitted to the Inner Temple and called to the bar in 1885. He practiced as a barrister and a special pleader until his death. His body was found floating in the River Thames off Thorneycroft’s torpedo works near Chiswick on 31 December 1888. Medical examination suggested that his body was kept at the bottom of the river for several weeks by stones placed in his pockets. The coroner’s jury concluded that he committed suicide by drowning “whilst of unsound mind.” His disappearance and death shortly after the fifth and last canonical murder (which took place on 9 November 1888) and alleged “private information” led some of the investigators years later to suggest he was the Ripper, thus explaining the end to the series of murders.
This article is licensed under the GFDL because it contains quotations from Wikipedia.
Contributor: JFrater























February 9th, 2009 at 1:41 am
Cool
February 9th, 2009 at 1:43 am
Great list JFrater!
February 9th, 2009 at 1:44 am
If Holmes, Monk, Shawn, Conan and all other brilliant fictional detectives I’m not aware of aren’t fictional, I wonder if they would be able to solve this case.
February 9th, 2009 at 1:46 am
I didnt know that there were that many suspects. Also, I cant believe I’m one of the first to leave a comment. I love this site!
February 9th, 2009 at 1:58 am
alas another interesting topic… =)
February 9th, 2009 at 2:04 am
Saucy Jack, He’s a naughty one..
February 9th, 2009 at 2:06 am
Wonder what happened to the “Top Political Families”. Did it disappear and will make a re-appearance after clean-up?
February 9th, 2009 at 2:12 am
Meg-
Yes, each of these great (albeit made-up) detectives would have solved the crimes at the end of its respective book/epispode. Don’t forget that Grissom, Caine, and Hunter (80’s U.S. television detective) would have also brought the Ripper to justice. However, the real issue here is that the Ripper is actually Gabriel Gray (a.k.a. Sylar) who has gone back in time, with the help of some powers he has newly acquired, and committed these horrible atrocities. But have no fear, our heroes Claire, Peter and Parkman (along with some help from the anti-hero Noah Bennett) will be hot on his heels. You can see all this and more, this fall – Monday nights on NBC.
Seriously!…Just watch, I dare you.
Great list, love the site, blah blah blah, and all that good stuff.
February 9th, 2009 at 2:20 am
John Leslie Stephenson
February 9th, 2009 at 2:23 am
WARNING. Jack is back. Suspected for the killing of the Top Political Families list…..8)
February 9th, 2009 at 2:29 am
Kalyan: it disappeared – it may come back one day
stevek: that was me doing the killing – so be good or I might make you victim 7!
February 9th, 2009 at 2:29 am
Saucy Jack, he’s a haughty one!
February 9th, 2009 at 2:29 am
What about walter sickat?
February 9th, 2009 at 2:33 am
cb: Sickert is very interesting and I would have put him on the list as number 11 – not because of his actions, but the weird actions of Patricia Cornwell who was desperate to prove it was him. Experts in the area don’t give a bit of credence to her claims though. Wikipedia has a short article on him which mentions Cornwell too. Thanks for mentioning him
February 9th, 2009 at 2:41 am
@Confused: It seems that at the end of the day, this will still be a job for Superman. T_T
lol
February 9th, 2009 at 3:05 am
Great list!
February 9th, 2009 at 3:23 am
jfrater. At last, a way for me to have my 15 mins of fame.
Stevek, victim 7 of Jack the Ripper, 120 years after victim 6.
Jamie still claiming he is not the Ripper, or a time-traveler, but talks about the people on his list as if he knows them personally.
And I’m sure I have seen your face in some of the old pics in your lists.
I’m keeping both my eyes on you, well at least your lists, I’ll find the proof in here somewhere.
Now you have a new conspiracy theory for another list. lol
February 9th, 2009 at 3:46 am
I never knew Dr Kay Scarpetta was that old. LoL
February 9th, 2009 at 4:07 am
Carlos #4 – there are over 30 suspects listed in the Jack the Ripper “Casebook” and there are about a dozen others who have been ‘named’ over the past 120 years since the killings that don’t make the ‘Casebook’s’ list.
Try researching the “Casebook: Jack the Ripper: site – it’s extensive and mind-boggling in its complexity.
In ‘05 my son and I had the privilege of going on a Jack the Ripper walking tour of Whitechapel (at night) including a brief stop over at “The 10 Bells” pub.
February 9th, 2009 at 4:13 am
Interesting list! I shouldn’t really comment cos I have homework but I’m insisting it’s a scheduled break.
I read Patricia Cornwell’s book where she suggests Jack was the artist Walter Sickert. Dunno if anyone else has read it but it struck me as being somewhat shrill with a certain amount of jumping to ridiculous conclusions. At most I felt he could have written the famous letters to the police. I also read that she purchased some of Sickert’s work with the sole purpose of destroying it. Anyone know if that’s true? I lent the book to someone and never got it back so I can’t check if it was there that I read it.
February 9th, 2009 at 4:27 am
This is quite funny as I went to the london dungeons last week. Jack the ripper is a large part of the experience. Wasn’t there a rumour that the elephant man was the ripper? I think it was proved impossible as he couldn’t have ran to the scene or something like that. As if the poor guy didnt have enough problems…
February 9th, 2009 at 4:29 am
wahhahaa
i thinnk it would be prince albert
February 9th, 2009 at 5:08 am
Jfrater: thanks for the details. I have a mate that is certain it’s him so I was surprised to not see him on the list, it just goes to show how many people it could really be!
February 9th, 2009 at 5:40 am
JFrater, A little more research would lead you to find that the theory of Prince Albert being jack the ripper was a sham created by a man so he could money from selling yet another Jack The Ripper story to the press.
Prince albert also did in fact have syphilis but it was too far gone by the time of his murders that his hands would tremble
February 9th, 2009 at 5:41 am
I agree with Spange. I too read the Patricia Cornwell’s book. I have to agree about Sickert. It’s not a story but her accounts investigating the murders.
Look into it.
February 9th, 2009 at 5:50 am
Great List, but, i just bought the book “the suspicions of Mr Whicher” about the Kent murder at Road Hill House of 1860, and #5 has just ruined the ending for me.
February 9th, 2009 at 6:50 am
very interesting, i didn’t know any of these.
February 9th, 2009 at 7:00 am
This has always been very interesting to me. I think though, that the abundance of suspects proves the desperate situation the police were in, to find the killer and make the area safe again. I think that some of the suspects were picked simply because justice needed to be done and any “evidence”, no matter how far fetched, was used to try and place the blame on someone.
One of the great mysteries of the criminal world.
Great List.
February 9th, 2009 at 7:08 am
Fascinating list! I wonder if the mystery will ever be solved?
February 9th, 2009 at 7:29 am
anyone else find it slightly ridiculous that one of the suspects was named “Cutbush”?
February 9th, 2009 at 7:35 am
John Douglas’ “The Cases That Haunt Us” makes a good read on the subject, as well as other unsolves murders
February 9th, 2009 at 7:39 am
My money is on number six. That’s a killer ’stache.
February 9th, 2009 at 7:59 am
I did a research paper on The Ripper in high school. I remember a couple of these names. I think I recall reading there was a LOT of evidence pointing to Tumbelty.
February 9th, 2009 at 8:12 am
That picture of “Jill The Ripper” is CREEPY! I couldn’t scroll past it fast enough!
As for the true identity of “Red Jack” he was a malicious incorporeal entity that feed on fear. But don’t worry, Captain Kirk had him beamed into space at maximum dispersion, spreading him into billions of harmless atoms.
Case closed.
February 9th, 2009 at 8:18 am
@30. Writergal – “I wonder if the mystery will ever be solved?”
Does anyone know the longest any unsolved murder/cold case has gone before being solved?
February 9th, 2009 at 8:38 am
What about James Maybrick?
February 9th, 2009 at 8:52 am
Good job at making me believe half these guys were Jack.
Tumblety’s mustache is amazing.
Also, why am I not surprised that an abortionist found killing his patients to be a good way to spend the day?
February 9th, 2009 at 8:55 am
I got to number 7 and I thought “Wow. Neat moustache.” Then I scrolled down to number 6. That thing is hilarious.
February 9th, 2009 at 8:56 am
well there’s a list cold cases solved after a extremly long time
February 9th, 2009 at 9:00 am
You left out Boris and Natasha
February 9th, 2009 at 9:04 am
Well, as they say so often about other lists being to American, THIS IS TOO MUCH OF AN ENGLISH LIST. Oops, trying to get my tongue out of my cheek.
February 9th, 2009 at 9:10 am
Great list. Love it when I learn a thing or two when reading the contributions to the website. The Prince Albert theory would make a great movie.
February 9th, 2009 at 9:32 am
Walter Sickert should’ve been 1st in my opinion. There’s a book named “portrait of a killer” which gives very very good reasons why he was Jack. I am convinced he was Jack the ripper. Awesome book!..I def. recommend it. but good list though.
February 9th, 2009 at 9:33 am
joss: “Also, why am I not surprised that an abortionist found killing his patients to be a good way to spend the day?”
i don’t understand what you mean by this statement.
February 9th, 2009 at 9:34 am
Oh and Kominski has some bitchin’ sideburns. I’m sure that was his secret to luring women to commit his murders if he was jack..lol
February 9th, 2009 at 9:57 am
Interesting! Lewis Carroll? That poor guy was accused of too much in his life. I believe that the only thing about him was he wasn’t interested in the greed, hate, and business minds of his peers… and that he wrote wonderful stories.
It makes sense that the Ripper was a woman.
February 9th, 2009 at 10:16 am
Good list JF
I dont think this case will ever be solved – you need witnesses, or the actual perpetrator confessing on his\her death bed.
Their was something on Sky News the other night about a guy confessing to a murder he commited in the 50s in the UK he was also sickly and only had a short time to live.
I would recommend – clean your slate – before the shit hits the fan, you dont know what St. Peter has in mind for you.
February 9th, 2009 at 10:17 am
I think the moral of this list is people with syphilis should be locked up before they go rippin on the ho’s.
See what happens after you let Prince Albert ‘out’ of the can?
February 9th, 2009 at 10:41 am
Great list. I put my money on “Dr” Francis Tumblety’s moustache- that thing could kill cats and small goats from 20 yards away!
February 9th, 2009 at 10:56 am
Excellent list! I have always been fascinated by Jack the Ripper, and it seems I am far from being alone on that front.
I have read everything I could find (non-fiction) I could find on the subject, and even questioned John Douglas about it…his suspect is not on the list, btw.
Only one phrase jarred me out of my complete enjoyment of the list:
“Constance Kent, who had served 20 years for the murder of her younger brother at the age of sixteen.”
I makes it seem as if poor Constance killed her brother four years before she was even born. I know, of course, exactly what you meant, but it’s sort of dangling participle time there, and dangling participles are my favorite grammar mistakes of all. They are the easiest to make and the funniest.
Seriously though, Jamie, this is one of the best lists of the past three or four months. Extremely well researched, informative, and a subject matter that still fascinates everyone.
February 9th, 2009 at 11:22 am
Great spooky list – seems like these kind of lists are Jamie’s forté these days. Too English? There are quite a lot of country specific subjects – such as Route 66. Being written exclusively by a New Zealander, this typifies the developing role of global journalism in the emerging ‘citizens of the world’ era. Yes, that does sound a bit overblown – but we’re gettin’ there.
As for the list – great – although quite heavy considering my psychic links. Having looked into the faces of all these characters, the strongest reaction came from No. 5. Very deep and dark energies there.
February 9th, 2009 at 12:20 pm
No.1 is from my hometown, and if I remember correctly, he’s buried there too. Huzzah! Nice to see it mentioned on listverse.
February 9th, 2009 at 12:22 pm
Love this list! I got to go on the night-time walking tour of the murder sites a couple years ago and it is quite creepy. Even worse was that the end point of the tour was not the starting point so the group I was with had to go searching around for a tube station after hearing all these stories!
Thanks for the good reading today.
February 9th, 2009 at 12:35 pm
is it wrong that i think #1 is pretty hot?
February 9th, 2009 at 12:49 pm
I believe that the History Channel did a 1 hour show on Jack and named Prince Albert as the best and likley suspect.
Interesting list.
February 9th, 2009 at 1:15 pm
Great list! I love this subject and read several books on it. Marray (#37) suggested James Maybrick, and the “Diary of Jack the Ripper” covers a supposed “diary” of the murderer. It was never proven or disproven, but evidence does point to the fact that it was probably written at the time of the murders.
Love the theory that the Elephant Man was the ripper. “I am not an animal! I’m Jack the Ripper!”
February 9th, 2009 at 1:58 pm
Of all the suspects on this list, Kominski is the most likely. Or somebody much like him, as Roy Hazelwood of the FBI said (I think it was Hazelwood). Cutbush seems to be similar to Kominski. All the others are not too believable.
February 9th, 2009 at 2:20 pm
Ummm… the butler did it.
You missed the opportunity to have this be a contest, jfrater. If the list reaches so many comments, one person will be selected at random to be murdered. lmao
Sorry, been up for way too long and feeling a bit wonky. I think it’s time for some rest. Great list, though.
February 9th, 2009 at 3:03 pm
I think the one guy’s name is Aaron Kosminski not Kominski
February 9th, 2009 at 3:23 pm
#37 Murray – James Maybrick – the Liverpool cotton merchant – has been discredited as the Ripper. I don’t recal the details, but it appears there are certain aspects of the diary which, while not fraudulent, appear to be TOO “well-rehearsed” as though written with knowledge of the events as would be known be an investigator or “Ripperologist” (even an antique one) as opposed to thw Ripper himself.
As for Druitt – he is undoubtedly one of the best candidates; however, the ONE thing that sets him apart is the fact that he apparently suicided around the same time that the Ripper Killings ceased. However, serial killers are rarely self-terminators; so either he was identified as Jack and quietly ‘liquidated’ (no pun intended) or he wasn’t Jack – certainly his habits don’t always maatch up.
A better candidate is the Surgeon Sir John Williams – the most recent addition to the ‘Line-up of Suspects’. He was the subject of a book entitled “Uncle Jack” which was written by a descedant relative ( a grand/great-grand nephew); Tony Williams. Mr.Williams makes a compelling case which the JTR Casebook calls “conjectural”; based on the fact that “In their opinion, John Williams was a cold character, but nothing in his nature suggests he was a killer”
Nothinhg about Bundy or Dahmer was suspected until they were caught either!
However, the members of the Tour Company who led us through the streets of Whitechapel are rostered to do so ONLY if they are confirmed ‘Ripperologists’ and know their material exceptionally intimately – and one of whom is a PhD in History from Cambridge and whoi has made Jack a lifelong study are all CONFIRMED believers in the fact that Williams is, far and away THE best candidate for being Jack the Ripper himself.
It was they who recommended the book “Uncle Jack” – and it IS a very compelling read.
Writergal (#30) and Confused #36) – not a chance Jack will ever be “caught” (or identified). Too much time has passed, too little evidence remains, too mauch conjecture obtains and too many suspects in the mix.
February 9th, 2009 at 4:07 pm
What about Walter Sickert there has been some mitochondria DNA linking him to Ripper letters.
February 9th, 2009 at 4:07 pm
Sorry just noticed CBs comment
February 9th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
Donald Rumbelow published a great book on this some time ago. The Cornwell book is utter trash.
February 9th, 2009 at 4:38 pm
Excellent list Jamie. I’ve read about the dna findings as well; maybe Sickert did write the letters – the folks who have studied Jack don’t believe that most of the letters were written by him, but rather by a journalist wanting to cash in. The exception of course being the letter containing the kidney and thalamus (?).
Others have mentioned but it’s worth repeating; if you’re interested, check out Casebook. It has a mind numbing amount of information, in fact probably just about everything available publicly.
February 9th, 2009 at 6:22 pm
Nice list and well researched.
If it really was # 6 (Tumblety) and one of his victims got away the lady could describe the guy to the police as someone with a birds head stuck up his nose with a wing span of about 12 inches.
February 9th, 2009 at 6:32 pm
Jamie – awesome list. Great reading.
Have a McHappy day.
February 9th, 2009 at 7:47 pm
it was me
February 9th, 2009 at 8:48 pm
no it wasn`t it was me
February 9th, 2009 at 9:05 pm
bigski ill stab u ok
February 9th, 2009 at 9:08 pm
Bring it on bi-atch. My middle name is Dexter.
February 9th, 2009 at 9:33 pm
You should do a list about the Black Dahlia murders next.
Just a recommendation.
February 10th, 2009 at 12:23 am
The Black Dahlia appears in at least one other list…
February 10th, 2009 at 2:30 am
Regarding Lewis Carroll as a suspect, based on clumsy anagrams: this theory was decisively mocked into well-deserved oblivion by a “Straight Dope” column in the late 90’s.
February 10th, 2009 at 6:41 am
yess a jack the ripper list!
love it!
February 10th, 2009 at 7:32 am
Hello? People? It’s obviously Cutbush (#4)! Look at the picture!!!
February 10th, 2009 at 8:26 am
henry silva posited that it was the loch ness monster
February 10th, 2009 at 1:41 pm
72. Jael: You should do a list about the Black Dahlia murders next.
Just a recommendation.
****
I’ve met the son of the Black Dahlia murderer. He wrote a book: Black Dahlia Avenger, his name is Steve Hodel. Weird character. The book is amaturish and poorly written, but quite convincing.
February 10th, 2009 at 10:15 pm
I think it’s Cutbush too, but for a somewhat different reason than his picture…..Hmmm……What obvious clue could point us at Cut Bush?
February 11th, 2009 at 12:04 pm
@scottrodo – Lame. He never cut bush. At least not literally.
And the suggestion about the Black Dahlia murders.. there are no suspects for that one as far as I know. o.O What would it be? A list of the circumstances, which you can find anywhere on the internet?
In related topic:
Great list, but what about John Leslie Stephenson? I think he was the guy they connected with through handwriting that the Ripper left at the scene one time. Never proved though, as I think the person saw the handwriting many years after seeing JLS’s. Or something similar to that. Anyhow, just making a suggestion.
February 11th, 2009 at 2:34 pm
I love Jack the Ripper stuff (and I’m glad many more people feel the same!) Has anyone been watching a series called Whitechapel on ITV1 (U.K)? Although it isn’t laterally about the Ripper, I’ve learned a lot about the murders and I’m fascinated abouthe/she/it(?) was never caught! Great list!
February 11th, 2009 at 7:37 pm
Very cool list JF.
I too read the book by Patricia Cornwell. It was a fun read but hard to take seriously.
She seemed to be patting herself on the back a little too much.
February 11th, 2009 at 8:33 pm
I don’t think Cornwell really believes her conclusion. I think she became too invested (literally and figuratively) in the idea to be able to back out gracefully, once the real Ripperologists “ripped” her to shreds. It was just an added bonus that a decisive answer is unlikely to ever be known.
Besides, everyone focuses on well-known (or reasonably “knowable” suspects), quite forgetting that it is entirely possible that the murders were committed by some no-name psycho who dropped completely from history because a viable paper trail simply no longer exists for him. It wasn’t exactly the InterNet age.
February 11th, 2009 at 9:34 pm
(a) what do the deciphered anagrams of Lewis Carrol say?
I’m no bibliophile or scholar or code breaker by any means, but I have come across anagrams before in books I have read. Where does this originate? Was there a purpose other than what seems to be a game? Such as a riddled brain teaser that camouflages insight or knowledge?
I know it seems off subject but, in a way it isn’t.
(b) No need to repeat my thoughts on the Cornwell book and Sickert. Refer to the recent “firsts” list (a leftover rushfan submission?) . Wait…. it wasn’t that recent apparently. I don’t remember the exact title. Haven’t been here in a while. I thought I was then begining to muster up an interesting argument or thought process (although it might have gone in the direction of art, celebrity, the idea of time creating a larger complexity, puzzles, cultural icons,ect ), but like most of all my comments here, when a reply to me does occur, an exchange doesn’t continue much after one, or at most, two. and the interest dies . or it seems to (i blame myself). who knows. so, why do I bother? perhaps I don’t stretch out. Not always the best place to rest…but still I sniff and pee and chew on garbage and the like.
Self analytical demise.
(c) I sorta wish that there was more weight to the Ripper in New York hypothesis.
(d) anti climatic truths tend to be what underscores the larger ships that are built over minds and imagination.
but not always. the undeniable outcome and the open-ended—
(e)…
February 12th, 2009 at 8:16 pm
According to the Australian Biography site, Constance Kent was brought to Australia by her younger brother William soon after her release in 1886. She spent the rest of a very long life there, as a nurse, and other respectable positions. Thus she, likely, was NOT available to sneak back into England a couple of years later to slice and dice some random prostitutes. Indeed, she doesn’t seem to have killed anyone else at all once she was set loose, in nearly 60 years of freedom. And her brother, a respected expert on sea life and successful businessman, doesn’t appear to have suffered by his association with his notorious sibling.
February 13th, 2009 at 10:34 am
Always love your list, Jfrater, but I felt compelled to comment on this one because I’m quite the Ripper-ologist, as they say.
I’m impressed that Thomas Cutbush came up, as that is the only one of the 10 I’d never heard of before, and I thought I’d heard it all about the Ripper case…hehe… However, I must say (and you DID point this out several times) that pretty much all of these suspects have been ruled out by experts of the case EXCEPT for #5 – Aaron Kominsky.
Kominsky has been often confused by a couple other obscure names in the Ripper suspect list over the years – that of Nathan Kaminsky and one David Cohen. John Douglas, the celebrated criminal profiler, looked at this case from every angle, with all the evidence available to him. He concluded that, due to their behavior and proximity to the murders, the likeliest suspects out of the hundreds that have been named, were Kominsky and Cohen.
They both exhibited EXTREME antisocial tendencies to the point of ridiculously bizarre behavior. Kominsky was known to refuse food from people and instead eat scraps off the street. He often threatened passersby with knives and kept running conversations with himself as he wandered the streets. Finally, he was quietly taken away and taken to the nearby hospital where he died several years later. Kinda fits but Douglas liked Cohen even more for the murders….
David Cohen was in his early to mid 20s and picked up by the authorities when residents of the East End complained of a wandering, raving lunatic in the area. When they brought him to the mental hospital nearby, he would tear off whatever clothing they gave him and attacked anyone who got near him. He finally died a year later from “exhaustion of mania”, a 19th century term for a massive nervous breakdown. When you see the ever-escalating insanity of the murders, from a couple fairly straightforward throat-slittings in the beginning to a maniacal dissection of Mary Kelly in the end, it’s pretty clear that whoever was responsible was at the end of his mental rope. And the mysterious David Cohen character certainly seems to be a strong suspect.
February 15th, 2009 at 3:14 am
i think this jack fella stole my pants and ripped em
February 15th, 2009 at 11:10 pm
It was Keyser Soze I tell ya. He’s the one that did it
February 15th, 2009 at 11:13 pm
The Usual Suspects.
February 15th, 2009 at 11:33 pm
LoL @ Patrick & bigski. Why not Stefeno DiMera?
February 16th, 2009 at 5:50 pm
uncle sam – i’ve read the ‘uncle jack’ book too. i agree, it’s really good and informative. made a lot of sense.
i recommend it too! the evidence does seem to add up!
February 23rd, 2009 at 8:49 pm
Jill is tore up from the floor up!
February 25th, 2009 at 5:36 pm
I worked at Leavesden mental hospital in Hertfordshire from 1985-1991 as a nurse & during that time a doctor friend of mine had accsess to some very old medical records which were placed in the basement stores of the main hospital(since been demolished & replaced by a housing developement-so the records have been moved but shouldnt be too hard to locate).
One day whilst the doctor was trawling through some of these dusty,old,neglected early to late victorian records he was astonished to find the records of Kominski,one of the alleged Jack the rippers?!.
The medical notes were either brought there from London colney or Kominski could have spent time at Leavesden hospital itself,but the notes stated CLEARLY that this WAS the ripper,Kominski apparently confessed in full detail.
The government did not want another purge on the Jews so obviously kept the matter very quite as Britain had some very prominent Jews at the time-Disraeli(a Jew)had recently been prime minister.
If anybody with the time & means were to locate those medical records WE could become very rich indeed!!,ive wanted to tell the world this for a long time so there it is,i hate mysteries with no ending so heres an end to one of the greatest mysteries of all time.I hope those records have not ‘dissapeared’as some medical notes seem to when hospital negligence cases are running!!!
Keep me informed of any progress as i may be of some help.
Paul C
February 25th, 2009 at 6:17 pm
Ps-only an insane!& illiterate immigrant would would spell Jews as JUWES!,ie Aaron Kosminski/Kominski
February 27th, 2009 at 7:43 am
I think Patricia Cornwell was right on when she figured it out to be Walter Sickert. He had all the traits of a true psychopath, especially his early childhood trauma. They didn’t know if he was a boy or girl and dressed him in girl’s clothes until he had three surgeries around age three on his private parts and declared him a male with a very small penis. That right there is enough to turn someone psycho. But the rest of his life was just as appalling. Who in God’s name would paint a picture of that monster Jack the Ripper and call it The Ripper’s Bedroom with a shadowy figure looking out the window. All Sickert’s paintings were dark and gloomy. I think he was the Ripper and so does a detective in London that Patricia Cornwell worked with.
February 27th, 2009 at 12:24 pm
You are still guessing?!,a lot of smokescreens were thrown up by the media/police&government desperate to shield the real killer-& a couple of convenient & coincidental suicides by suspects were recorded after the rippers last murder!.
Kosminskis files were obviously lost/misplaced as are thousands of other medical records in the nhs,Kosminskis notes just happened to be found(with a SECRET stamp marked on them)by an eagle eyed doctor working at Leavesden hospital,which is no more than 8 miles from London colney lunatic asylum.
THEY knew who the real ripper was &for the reasons i mentioned before they have kept it secret,i am 100% certain that the evidence given in the notes is completely true & accurate,no doubt about it-i KNOW it was Aaron Kosminski
March 26th, 2009 at 11:17 am
Just found out that the Kosminski notes which were stored in the vaults under the main canteen of Leavesden hospital,Herts were SHREDDED before the hospital was demolished,how utterly convenient?!,my friend who worked there witnessed the process,shame on u all.
March 26th, 2009 at 1:52 pm
96. paul c:…the Kosminski notes…were SHREDDED before the hospital was demolished…shame on u all.
****
Hey, paul, I live in another country, I wasn’t there, I didn’t have anything to do with it and I’m not ashamed of anything.
So there
April 2nd, 2009 at 7:01 am
what about Walter Sickett?
April 2nd, 2009 at 7:05 am
i don`t think we will ever know for sure who did these hideous crimes. there are many conspiracy theories surrounding this subject and i for one find it hard to sort the wheat from the chaff.
April 14th, 2009 at 6:54 pm
Sweet Marie: If you really look at 99% of Cornwell’s statements they usually begin with “It may have happened”, “He may have felt this”, “It was most likely” and so on. I think there’s afew too many maybes in her case against Sickert.
I’ll give her points for persistence, that’s about all.
Bottom line? She didn’t solve Jack, in my opinion.
April 16th, 2009 at 9:32 pm
I agree with idesofmarch,Cornwall has No proof, just speculation ie: may have, could have, was maybe there… wouldn’t know a ripper from a zipper. Douglas believes that Kominski and Cohen were one and the same and that the Cohen name came from the practice of calling male members of the Jewish race by the generic name of cohen (re; The Remaining Suspects, The Cases That Haunt Us)
I am suprised that no one has mentioned the (in my humble opinion) best and most difinite case study of the crimes (Rumbelow non-withstanding) that of Philip Sugden,titled The Complete History. He gives a professional, accurate debunking of the rumors(!) and myths touted out by the more sensational and repetitive mongerers who were too lazy or disinclined to do their own research. Although I may disagree with Mr. Sudgen’s opinion, his book is a study in detail. The only indisputable fact about the case is that, unless a manuscript is suddenly or finally found , documented to one of the original case investigators, we’ll never know Jacks identity. And wouldn’t it spoil the game if we did!?
April 17th, 2009 at 1:52 am
I dont know about you lot but i KNOW it was Kosminski,put it this way-it HAS to be one of the suspects on the list but i have heard or seen NO evidence of the ripper being anyone else but Kosminski,maybe some people want the great mystery & suspense to go on forever for financial reasons?!,it is a great story & money spinner after all!.
Put all the evidence ive mentioned together & there has to be NO DOUBT ABOUT IT.
The ripper was crazy,a crazy person would not feel guilt and commit suicide if he was cornered/suspected of the crimes?,that takes out a couple of suspects.How many of the suspects were apprehended by the police & placed into a lunatic asylum just outside of London at around the time of the last murder & had “jack the ripper” written in their medical notes with a secret stamp on them??=NONE OF THE SUSPECTS EXCEPT AARON KOSMINSKI !!,do you hear what im saying
April 22nd, 2009 at 10:10 pm
102.paul, Are we getting a little maniacal about this whole thing? Perhaps a little shrill? This is after all,nothing but speculation and mental exercise. We may all have an opinion, I doubt that yours carries any eccessive weight more than mine. A discussion should be just that, not a discourse on your opinion. Of course, Boss, thats just me!!
May 2nd, 2009 at 3:00 am
An interesting addition would be Dr. Jose Rizal, the national hero of the Philippines.
May 13th, 2009 at 7:53 am
Ron-i really dont give a shit who did what-im just telling u what I KNOW so the mystery is solved for me-ur just sour cos ur well out the game son!!
May 13th, 2009 at 8:19 am
I believe it was the guys in the grassy knoll.
j.k. Great list!~
June 11th, 2009 at 3:47 pm
my money is on the royal
June 12th, 2009 at 3:16 pm
EW
I certainly wouldn’t like to meet him on a cold, dark night. He gives me the creeps.
June 26th, 2009 at 2:11 pm
Great list.
But I really feel sorry for Montague John Druitt, he seemed like he had so many problems, and I wouldn’t be suprised if he didn’t outburst a violent attack on people for whatever his reason. Plus, this sounds completely messed up seeing as he’s a #1 suspect for a killer case, but he is actually quite fit haha. But what convinced me he was the killer was the fact he was very intelligant, he went to Oxford and alsorts, think about the writing on the wall, the way they misspelt “Jews” the way the letters misspelt “Kidney”, perhaps he was trying to cover his tracks up, make him less convincing.
I think that Joseph Barnett was quite suspicious, to me anyway, if you think about it, Mary Jane Kelly’s murder, the door was left after the killing, without a scratch, not a mark, someone had to have opened it, with a key perhaps, Joseph was her lover, he had a key, no one else did, Jack The Ripper dosen’t just let himself out. Plus the fact, all the other victims were older, perhaps after he had killed all the other prostitutes in the town, he decided to strike on his wife, you don’t just go from prostitutes at the same age, to a woman much younger than your other victims.
At first I was convinced it was William Sickert, because of the letter-stamp.
I’d say either Montague John Druitt (God forbid) or Joseph Barnett, but some how I think we can never be sure, which saddens me, because I am really intrested in this case, I would pay a lot of money just to find out who it was, but there’s so many suspects now, it just makes it impossible unfortunately.
June 26th, 2009 at 10:58 pm
omg, that woman’s picture for #8 is going to give me nightmares!
June 28th, 2009 at 4:24 am
Hey call me crazy but there’s something that don’t add up here.. the last suspect in the jack the ripper case was seemingly James Thomas was it not ? the police had him as a suspect then let him go. Now if you look at this map closely… http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/39/Whitechapel_Spitalfields_7_murders.JPG
what’s odd is it seems to form a arrow. The point of the arrow hits near st james … then the other end of the arrow is near thomas rd … Its a ironic thing and probs could be a far stretch since the man couldn’t write for shit as seen in the letters im pretty sure he could not have planed it to work out like that. but its a stab in the dark i guess.
July 18th, 2009 at 9:49 am
lol i had great time reading this.
i think its Carl Feigenbaum (from wiki’s suspect list) and altho his profile is not that researched his description amazingly matches quite well…
altho, i have a hunch that i dont think its any of the above, haha. i read on wiki, and its strange how most of the people’s background don’t fit the description at all, maybe jack the killer was a few killers (like one original and a another or a few copycats?)
ohhh i’m just trying to be an amateur detective, this is so mysterious
July 24th, 2009 at 2:50 am
whilst researching this subject for a school project many years ago i came across evidence that a murder had been committed in southampton , of a prositute in very similar cercumstances, before these murders were commited.It is my belief that this was the work of the now famous jack.I think the suspect was later hanged in scotland for a different crime.
October 5th, 2009 at 7:53 pm
Jack the ripper is the lich king…
October 14th, 2009 at 6:05 pm
There is one other suspect ( which is the most believable) that this writer had forgotten to mention.
Walter Sickert.
I am reading ‘Case closed’ a portrait of a killer.
Highly recomended
He had a house about a mile away from where Emily Dimmock was murdered. His art work was very similair to the little sketches left by Jack in his tauntings to the police. The way some of the victims on a bed … was layed on a certain bed that was listed in some of his works of art.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Sickert
October 14th, 2009 at 6:09 pm
Nm someone named him. But I still would recomend the book for a very convincing read!
“98 deviantmiss
April 2nd, 2009 at 7:01 am
what about Walter Sickett?”
October 14th, 2009 at 6:09 pm
@Itsaysitall (115): Sickert? Saying that Sickert was the Ripper is like saying that the US Government blew up the Twin Towers. In other words, crazy!
November 3rd, 2009 at 4:06 am
Quite creepy!
November 10th, 2009 at 6:35 am
prince albert? is he hell what you makin stuff up for you saddo
November 12th, 2009 at 11:32 am
Thomas did it
November 18th, 2009 at 2:19 pm
Each one of these suspects with the exception of Druitt and Kosminski has been picked apart with serious investigations for example Cream was in prison at the time. I like the newly developed theory that Michael Kelly was the man escaping to New York after escaping the asylum where Ripper like murders continued there also he was the only one that killed someone by a neck slice(his wife). Chapman on the surface is a good suspect but he murdered his wives with poison and its almost unheard of to murder by mutilation and then poison. 2 different killers obviously. Its either Druitt or Kelly.
December 7th, 2009 at 8:53 pm
How can this not also contain the artist Sickert from London?
December 13th, 2009 at 3:52 pm
I have read Patricia Cornwells book and found parts to be quite convincing, however reading all the comments I am interested to know why it is so rediculous that Walter Sickett was the Ripper?
I would just like to hear the other side?
January 12th, 2010 at 2:14 pm
I’m surprised Bush wasn’t blamed
January 22nd, 2010 at 1:21 pm
why is lewis carroll one?!
January 23rd, 2010 at 7:04 pm
There are many suspects you can take off the list just by hearing about them so here’s a list and my comment. I think one future book author investigating Jack the Ripper will put the names of the entire population of England in 1888 in a book and go – ‘heres the suspects’. There are many suspects – too many, some invented by authors with great imagination. So here’s a short list and my comment.
A Royal Plot – This theory was by author Stephen Knight who talked to some grandson who said that his painter dad knew of a Royal duke who had a baby by a prostitute(who posed for the painter). The Royal family decided to split them up by exiling the Duke from the prostitute, the prostitute was taken to a mental home where she then died. Some friends of the prostitute attempted bribery on the Royal family by saying that they wanted money or that the whole of England would know of the affair. So the Queen inscribed the help of her doctor and Freemasons(Lord Salisbury and Sir William Gull) who then killed the prostitute friends with each Jack the Ripper murder. This theory has no proper basis – they had to kill these prostitutes by slitting their throats then they would mutilate them? It seems that real assassins would just slit their throats all in one location and hide it up so that no one would get wind of it. No assassin would mutilate his victims. It certainly wasn’t the case of the assassin copying the act of a serial killer to mislead people to thinking it was a one, because Jack the Ripper was the first serial killer and sex murders did not happen in those days. It was also said that they could of been ritual killings and a lot other combining theories with this one but they are all garbage. The grandson whose dad was a painter retracted his comment after the book and said that he made it up. Good one.
Doctors – Did Jack the Ripper need medical knowledge to kill his victims? Some doctor’s said he did and some said he did not.
So was Jack a doctor? Certainly some serial killers don’t need to have the knowledge to perform mutilation but others have. Dahmer had the medical experience for his seventeen victims and I think Edmund Kemper got the idea of dissection from reading books. But in all senses I don’t think Jack had human medical knowledge(certainly not for a killer like him – this is in my end profile of the killer).
Dr Thomas Neill Cream – Cream killed four women by poisoning them with pills containing strychnine. He was arrested by Scotland Yard on 3 June 1892 on suspicion of murder. He was convicted and sentenced to die by hanging on the 15 November 1892. When Cream was on the scaffold he was alleged to have said ‘I am Jack the…’ just as the bolt was drawn and he was killed. This one statement has made Cream a Jack suspect but either this statement is a lie by Cream or a lie by the execution staff. Neill Cream was a poisoner, he would never embark upon the throat cutting mutilation of Jack the Ripper. Whole different MO. It’s like saying that Jeffrey Dahmer could of stopped what he was doing and just become a poisoner(serial killers do change their MO when they gain experience but I’ve never heard of any killer going from mutilation to just poisoning). The whole thing is false.
George Chapman – In the late 1890’s Chapman married a woman who then mysteriously died when she became ill and had abdominal pains. He then married a barmaid and she died in the same conditions. He then married another barmaid and yet again she died in the same way as the others. Then someone became suspicious and suggested that Chapman poisoned them. An autopsy on all of the dead three found that they were killed by antimony poisoning. Chapman was convicted and hanged on the 7 April 1903. Somehow Chapman has been linked with Jack the Ripper. Chief Inspector Abberline, who was a detective in the Ripper case, said to the officer who arrested Chapman, ‘You’ve got Jack the Ripper at last!’. It was suggested that Chapman, motivated by sadism, gave up the Ripper-style murders because of the increased danger of detection, and took to poisoning his victims thereon. That is of course like saying that a senator will give up politics and start working in a factory because the people don’t like him. A serial killer will never change the way he murders his victims(the way he kills them-say mutilation or strangulation), so Chapman could of never been the Ripper.(You’ll find that every convicted killer around the 1890’s being a suspect to Jack the Ripper).
Frederick Bayley Deeming – Frederick Deeming lived in England and Africa before moving to Australia in 1891. In Australia he was arrested after a bad smell was emitting from his house, inside they found his dead wife under the floor. Police in England investigated Deeming and discovered the bodies of Maria Deeming and their four children cemented under the kitchen fireplace in their apartment in Liverpool. Deeming was found guilty and executed on the 23 May 1892. He was suspected of being Jack the Ripper. At the time of the Ripper murders Deeming was in Africa so he could of never been Jack, the MO is also completely different.
Freemasons – It has been said that the powerful Freemason community of 1888 London could of been responsible for the the murders in some sort of ritual killings involving Lord Salisbury and Sir William Gull. This theory also intertwines with the royalty one. These murders could of never been the act of many people, it was the act of a lone man, not a group of deranged masonic ritual killers. It was the act of a serial killer, a sex murderer, not a Freemason told to carry out ritual killings. Maybe I could be wrong, maybe the serial killer could have been a member of a Freemason ritual killings club(sarcastic-duh).
Midwife / Jill the Ripper – The suggestion that Jack could of been a woman is ridiculous. There has only been a few rare women serial killers and they have not carried out murders involving mutilation. It was suggested that it could of been a midwife because she could go around unnoticed with blood on her dress and stuff when all suspicions were on men. But then how could she control her victims? Bruises were found on victims so there was struggles and there’s no way a woman could control these women with such force. It has also been said that because Marie Kelly was killed indoors it could of been a midwife carrying out an abortion(this is also because clothing was found neatly piled on the chair next to the bed). There is no way that there could of been a female serial killer in 1888 carrying out murders on women with such sadistic force.
There are heaps of other suspects too, like one thousand, but they don’t get a mention.
Jack the Ripper’s crimes were indeed disorganized. If you see the classifications here they match entirely with Jack -
*
Murder usually happens spur of the moment(with no planning but the one simple objective to kill).
*
Does not bring any tools(‘rape kit’) to the kill except maybe murder device.
*
No contact with the victim prior to spur of the moment murder.
*
No rape, torture etc. will take place before murder.
*
Kills victim but does not care for evidence usually left at the crime scene(high degree of violence takes place at murder).
*
Will not move body in an attempt to hide, bury it etc., unconcerned of its discovery.
*
Killer might be involved further with the dead victim(mutilation, necrophilia, cannibalism, etc) and may also take souvenir.
Jack’s crimes showed much hate towards prostitutes, and females in general. Jack did not rape his victims but instead mutilated them, showing his anger and sexual frustration. The act of thrusting the knife into the body was a replacement for sex(this is called regressive necrophilia). Jack also killed the victim and left her in the same spot, with no will to clean up his mess or hide the body. It was highly probably that Jack had suffered from some mental illness to enact crimes of this classification. So what type of person would Jack the Ripper be?
A Basic Profile of Jack the Ripper
Jack would probably of grown up in a poor household, where the fathers work was unstable and where he experienced harsh discipline. The family could of also been subject to sexual abuse, alcohol or drug problems, mental illness etc. Jack would of been a shy quiet type as he had internalised the painful emotions at home. He would also have a poor self image with a disability or physical ailment, casting him from society and making him feel very inadequate. He would also be an underachiever and would probably have a menial job in the industrial sector. Jack would of been unable to live or socialise with other people, leading a very lonely life, the only people he would live with would be his parents or on his own. He would also have no relationships so his hate and anger would be aimed at the opposite of sex, but no rape, as he was very incapable. Jack’s mental illness would have played a big part on the murder and mutilation of his victims. He would also take little to no interest in the murder after it was committed so he would of never sent any letters(the media did). Jack’s motive was of course : sex. Jack was also a stable killer – a person who murders in the same basic area, so this means that it was quite definite that he lived right in Whitechapel in 1888.
January 30th, 2010 at 3:12 pm
JFrater, it seems that you have made the same mistake that the original Jack the Ripper investigators made in 1888.
Suspect #5 on the list, his actual name was Aaron Kosminski, not Aaron Kominski as you have spelt it. The Kosminski you name was a barber who was institutionalized in 1891, a full three years after the murders stopped. He died in 1919, and while incarcerated all those years never exhibited the extremely violent characteristics that a person such as Jack the Ripper would have shown.
But there was an individual named Nathan Kaminsky, whose last name is very similar to the Aaron Kosminski that you named. Many believe he was confused by the original investigators with Nathan Kaminsky, who was found wandering the streets of Whitechapel just after the last Ripper murder. He had gone totally insane and was obviously at the end of his emotional rope. He was mumbling to himself and picking up things off the ground and refused to accept food from anyone. He displayed the same type of paranoia that the true Jack the Ripper would have displayed. Plus, the true Jack the Ripper, after showing progressively increasing signs of insanity which is shown by the increasing viciousness with which he attacked and mutilated his victims, also most probably would have been at the end of his rope too right around the same time.
Nathan Kaminsky, who was picked up and labeled “David Cohen” (kind of like a generic John Doe) because he could not be readily identified, was institutionalized right after the last murder and died a short while later. Cohen (aka Nathan Kaminsky) exhibited violent, destructive tendencies while at the asylum, and had to be restrained during his short stay. He died not too long after the murders. Martin Fido, perhaps the world’s most respected and prominent researcher of the case, believes Cohen/Kaminsky is the true Jack the Ripper, and FBI behavioral profiler John Douglas also believes Cohen/Kaminsky (or “somebody just like him”) is the true killer. I’d have to agree.
But Suspect #1, Druitt, definitely did not do it. He committed suicide, and homicidal maniacs like Jack the Ripper almost never commit suicide after such a vicious and personal killing spree. Also, there is evidence that Druitt was at a cricket match during one of the murders.
February 4th, 2010 at 4:16 am
I think “Jack the ripper” was Dr francis tumblety !
All evidence points to him.
He came back to his lodging house at 2 am ,in a blood stained shirt, night of the double murders. He was in london at the time of the killings. The “from hell “letter is identical to his hand writing ! After he died , nuns found two rings on him identical to the ones took off annie chapmans fingers ! He had a large collection of uteruses and organs in glass jars, A hobby of his (Weird or what !).He had a great hate of women, especially prostitiutes. He just fits the bill of the killer !They should do a film about him, id say it WAS him!
February 8th, 2010 at 9:19 pm
I still can’t believe they haven’t solved this case yet. Anyways, it is clear jack the ripper died shortly after his last murder, since serial killers like that will only murder more and more as time passes.