Since the beginning of modern science we have been solving the great mysteries around us. Because of recent advances in science and technology we now have the ability to unravel some unknowns like never before. This list consists of 10 such mysteries which, fortunately, do not render any of our previous “unsolved mysteries” lists defunct!
The Ancient Theater of Epidaurus near Athens Greece was constructed in the late 4th century BC and is one of the best preserved ancient theaters. Even in ancient times, the theater was considered to have great acoustics. The actors can be perfectly heard by all 15,000 spectators without amplification. To demonstrate the theaters great acoustics tour guides have their groups scattered in the stands and then show them how faint sounds can be heard at center-stage. How this sound quality was achieved has been the source of academic and amateur speculation for many years. One of the theories suggested that prevailing winds were carrying the sounds. It turns out that that answer is in the seats. In 2007 researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology have discovered that the limestone material of the seats provide a filtering effect suppressing low frequencies of voices, thus minimizing background crowd noise so the seats act as natural acoustic traps. It is still unknown whether the acoustic properties are the result of an accident or the product of advanced design.
Interesting Fact: The orchestra (or dancing floor) has the shape of a perfect circle, with a diameter just above 19,50 meters. A circular base still preserved at its exact center most probably held an Altar to Dionysos (The Greek god of wine). You can watch and hear a demonstration of the theaters great acoustics here.
Most people are familiar with crystal skulls from the film Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. However there are actually many serious crystal skull collectors that claim they are pre-Columbian and were made during the Aztec or Maya civilizations and exhibit paranormal phenomena. In 2008 a team of British and American researchers using electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography examined skulls from the British Museum and Smithsonian. A detailed analysis of the skull’s surface revealed minute rotary scratch marks around the eye sockets, teeth and cranium. This was clear evidence that the skull was cut and polished with a wheeled instrument – and the Aztecs never used the wheel. The researchers concluded that the skulls were cut from a piece of Brazilian rock crystal in Europe. They were then probably sold to collectors as a relic from the ancient Aztec civilization. Many museums now have removed the skulls from display because of their questionable origins.
Interesting Fact: For the hardcore crystal skull fans out there I should mention the Mitchell-Hedges Skull which is probably the most famous skull of all. It was allegedly discovered in 1924 by the adopted daughter of British adventurer author F.A. Mitchell-Hedges. Hedges claimed that the crystal skull dates back at least 3,600 years. Detailed examination like the experiments mentioned above have never been done on this skull because the present owner of the skull will not allow testing.
On May 19, 1780 an unusual darkening of the day sky was observed over the New England states and parts of Canada. Since communication of the day was very primitive, some people in New England applied religious interpretations to the event. Even today New England’s Dark Day is still regarded by many as a supernatural event. Different explanations were discussed from volcanic eruptions to celestial cataclysms. In 2008 Nearly 230 years later, University of Missouri researchers combined written accounts and tree ring records from fire-damaged trees to determine that the dark day was caused by massive wildfires burning in Canada. During a fire the heat goes through the bark, killing the living tissue then a couple of years later the bark falls off revealing the wood and an injury to the tree. The researchers studied tree rings from the Algonquin Highlands of southern Ontario and many other locations. They found evidence that a major fire had burned in that time period that would have affected atmospheric conditions hundred of miles away. Large smoke columns were created and carried into the upper atmosphere accounting for New England’s dark day.
Interesting Fact: Accounts of ‘New England’s Dark Day’ include mentions of midday meals by candlelight, night birds coming out to sing, flowers folding their petals and strange behavior from animals.
The Cydonian region on Mars attracted a great deal of attention because one of the hills in that region looked remarkably man made. The region was first imaged in detail by the Viking 1 orbiter that was launched in 1975. Several images were taken by the Viking including one taken in 1976 showing one of Cydonian mesas had the appearance of face. Scientist dismissed the face as a trick of light and shadow but then a second image also showed the face at a different sun-angle. This caught the attention of organizations interested in extraterrestrial intelligence and some talk show hosts who believed the Face was a long-lost Martian civilization. Most scientists still held the belief that the face was just a consequence of viewing conditions. In 2003 when the European space agency launched Mars Express it was able to combine data from a high resolution stereo camera and create a 3D representation of the “Face on Mars”. The most recent image (bottom) I think would silence even the most faithful believers. The image shows a remnant massif thought to have formed from landslides and an early form of debris apron formation but no face in sight.
Interesting Fact: The Cydonia area is of great interest to planetary scientists because of their location. The mesas are in a transition zone between cratered highlands to the south and smoother lowland plains to the north. Some think the northern plains are all that’s left of an ancient Martian ocean.
The fascinating aspect of the barreleye fish is the tubular eyes which are excellent at collecting light at depths up to 2500m. The puzzling part is that the eyes appear to be fixed in place directly above its head. This had baffled physiologists for decades because it would be almost impossible for the fish to look for food. Recently scientists using a remotely operated vehicle studied the fish at depths ranging from 600-800 meters. They discovered a previously unknown fact, the tubular eyes exist behind a transparent fluid filled dome and the eyes can rotate within a transparent shield that covers the fish’s head. This allows the fish to peer up at potential prey or focus forward to see what it is eating. The Barreleye Fish was first discovered in 1939 but the transparent nature of the fish wasn’t known because when the fish was caught in nets at a different depth of water the see through part is destroyed.
Interesting Fact: Keep in mind when you look at the above picture that the two small holes in front of the fish are not eyes. The eyes are the two green domes inside the top of the head. You can see a clip of the barreleye fish swimming around here.
Checkers (Draughts) has been around for more than 400 years and has been enjoyed by millions of players. Since 1989 computers have worked around the clock to try and decipher the game’s 500 billion billion possible moves. In 1992, a computer was narrowly defeated by world champion Marion Tinsley who is widely regarded as the best human checkers player ever. Finally in 2007 a computer program called Chinook developed by researchers at the University of Alberta can now play a perfect game of checkers. In 2007 using between 200 desktop computers at the peak of the project Chinook can recognize every possible move made in a checkers game and determine the correct counter move. If neither player makes a mistake the game will end in a draw.
Interesting Fact: Checkers is the largest game that has been solved to date, with a search space of 5×10^20. The number of calculations involved was 10^14 and it was done over a period of 18 years.
Days after the Titanic sank the body of a baby boy was found and recovered from the North Atlantic. After the child could not be identified he was buried in Nova Scotia with a tombstone reading simply ‘The Unknown Child’. In 2001 researchers at Lakeland University in Ontario were granted permission to exhume the body. By consulting the passenger lists they had narrowed down the possible identity to one of four children: Gosta Paulson, Eino Panula, Eugene Rice and Sidney Goodwin. Initial tests concluded that the body was Eino Panula. However in 2007 this was shown to be not true. More advanced DNA testing was carried out on a tooth from the body and when compared to the DNA of a surviving Goodwin relative it proved an indisputable match. It confirmed that ‘the unknown child’ was Sidney Goodwin. Sidney was the youngest of six children born to Fred and Augusta Goodwin from Fulham, England and were immigrating to Niagara Falls New York. (All were onboard) Neither Sidney’s parents nor his siblings’ bodies were ever recovered. You can see a photo of the rest of the family here.
Interesting Fact: The sailors aboard the recovery ship were very upset by the discovery of the unknown boy’s body and paid for his monument. He was buried on 4 May 1912 with a copper pendant placed in his coffin by recovery sailors that read “Our Babe”. You can see the grave monument here.
This could be a case of one scientifically solved mystery solving another so I will try and explain the second one under “Interesting Facts” The circular clay tablet shown above was discovered 150 years ago at Nineveh the capital of ancient Assyria, in what is now Iraq. The tablet shows drawings of constellations and pictogram-based text known as cuneiform which was used by the Sumerians, the earliest known civilization in the world. For decades scientists have failed to decipher the tablet. In 2008 two scientists, Alan Bond and Mark Hempsell from Bristol University finally cracked the cuneiform code. By using a computer program that can reconstruct the night sky thousands of years ago. The two scientists were able to establish the tablet was a night notebook of Sumerian astronomers and refers to the events in the sky before dawn on the 29th of June 3123 BC (Julian calendar).
Interesting Fact: What makes this discovery even more amazing is the tablet also shows a large object travelling along the constellation of Pisces. The symbols show the trajectory of the object to an error of one degree to hit Köfels Austria. Köfels is recognized as the area of the largest rockslide in the crystalline Alps and has given rise to numerous theories about the cause of the rockslide. There is no crater so to modern eyes it doesn’t look as a meteor impact site should look. However from the information gathered from the tablet, the trajectory explains why there is no crater. The in-coming angle was very low (six degrees) so the scientists theorize that the asteroid clipped a near by mountain called Gamskogel and this caused the asteroid to explode before it reached its final impact point. To explain how they were able to get this much information from this little tablet is above my pay grade. You can see a picture of the rockslide area here.
In 2001 a Hammerhead shark was born at the Henry Doorly Zoo in Nebraska with three potential mothers in the same tank. All had been in captivity for at least three years. The birth of the shark baffled scientists for years. Some scientists thought one of them might have mated before being captured and stored the sperm for fertilization. Some scientist believed that sharks might be able to reproduce asexually through a rare method known as parthenogenesis (a direct development without the need of a sperm). Many were skeptical but in late 2007 scientists confirmed this through DNA testing. After they determined which of the three females was the mother they subtracted the mother’s contribution from the offspring and in this particular case after the DNA was subtracted there was nothing left. The researchers were forced to conclude that the pup had no father, making this he first documented case of asexual reproduction of a shark.
Interesting Fact: In 2008 Scientists confirmed a second virgin birth of a shark at the Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center. A 5-foot, 94-pound Atlantic blacktip shark died of stress-related complications related to her unknown pregnancy. During the necropsy a 10-inch shark pup was found surprising aquarium officials. DNA testing on the embryonic pup proved that the pup carried no genetic material from a male.
This is at the number one spot because it inspired the list. As I was growing up I used to hear when you take in consideration a bees wingspan along with the bees weight ratio it is aerodynamically impossible for them to fly. I also used to hear the only reason a bee can fly is because it thinks it can. I always thought that was a really cool explanation even though I knew it was probably not true. Scientists had many theories but were not able to explain exactly how the un-aerodynamic bee was able to fly. Finally in 2005 with the assistance of high-speed cinematography and mechanical models of the bee’s wings, scientists were able to put this perplexing mystery to rest. As it turns out the bee flap its wings an amazing 230 times per second, much faster than smaller insects. Their analysis revealed sufficient lift was generated by unconventional combination of short, choppy wing strokes, a rapid rotation of the wing as it flops over and reverses direction, along with a very fast wing-beat frequency.
Interesting Fact: In order to understand more how bees fly their heavy little bodies around, the researchers forced them to fly in a small chamber filled with a mixture of oxygen and helium which is less dense than regular air. (As if the aerodynamically challenged bees didn’t have enough on their plate) This required the bees to work harder to fly and gave the scientists a chance to observe the bee’s wings and body under stressful conditions. You can watch a bee’s flight in super slow motion here.
The reason for bellybutton lint has been the subject of mystery and speculation for many years. Now after three years of research and chemical analysis of 503 pieces of lint from his own bellybutton, chemist Georg Steinhauser from Vienna University has revealed the secret. The pieces of fluff were not made up of only cotton from clothing but there were also flecks of dead skin, fat, sweat and dust. His observations also showed that abdominal hair often seems to grow in concentric circles around the navel and act like a kind of barbed hooks. Dr Steinhauser established that shaving one’s belly will result in a lint-free navel.
Interesting Fact: I should also give credit to another research scientist and radio/TV personality Karl Kruszelnicki (Dr Karl) from Australia. Several years earlier he studied bellybutton lint samples sent to him by almost 5,000 people and found some similar findings and that the typical lint producer was “a slightly overweight, middle-aged male with a hairy abdomen”. The photo above is a 25 year collection of bellybutton lint from another Australian Graham Baker. This gave him a place in the Guinness Book of Records.

























April 7th, 2009 at 1:06 am
Fascinating! I’d only heard about 1 and 2. Great list!
April 7th, 2009 at 1:16 am
Wow, #3 and #2. And #8, that would have had to had been one hell of a fire. Was all of Canada on fire? Great list though!
April 7th, 2009 at 1:20 am
Crystal skull? never heard of it…..interesting…….
April 7th, 2009 at 1:20 am
Very interesting
April 7th, 2009 at 1:28 am
Regardless of any unearthly properties the crystal skulls may or may not possess, the question remains: where did they come from? There are countless hypotheses that they are the legacy of some higher intelligence. Many believe they were created by extraterrestrials or beings in Atlantis or Lemuria. One elaborate theory maintains that the skulls were left behind by a sophisticated Inner Earth society which lives at the hollow center of our planet, and there are thirteen “master skulls” which contain the history of these people.
April 7th, 2009 at 1:29 am
very cool
but i am sure there are many many more of those out there
April 7th, 2009 at 1:29 am
Great list
April 7th, 2009 at 1:37 am
Glad to see weird mysteries and topics back in the list. This is what brought me here in the first place. Let’s see if someone can work politics into the conversation on this one.
April 7th, 2009 at 1:42 am
Just how energy efficient creature the bumblebee is? I mean, it sucks some flowers and then flies around for hours, despite serious aerodynamic disadvantage. It’s far better than anything humans ever built, that’s for sure…
April 7th, 2009 at 1:46 am
this list reminds me of eagle eye mysteries – i miss that game
for #3 i read that they also discovered some ancient but recognizable optical lenses from the fertile crescent. this could explain why the mesopotamians knew so much about astronomy – they may have invented refracting telescopes, simply by playing with a couple of these lenses, centuries before newton!
also the bonus item would have looked like candy if it weren’t for the “navel fluff” labels
April 7th, 2009 at 1:47 am
very interesting list! thanks listverse! i expect more! long live to you! mabuhay!
April 7th, 2009 at 1:48 am
oh god i’m 13th! that’s not fair!
April 7th, 2009 at 1:52 am
Hurray for bees!! Apparently people used to use bees as an argument for proof of god.
I never realised that some people were that obsessed with bellybutton fluff….gross!
April 7th, 2009 at 2:02 am
How awesome would a Barreleye fish be in an aquarium?! Certainly a talking point!
April 7th, 2009 at 2:09 am
Great list, the best so far IMO
April 7th, 2009 at 2:17 am
Ok, nitpicking coming up——In #10, it’s whether, not weather. Ok, nitpick over!
*goes back to reading the rest of the list*
Very intersting by the way!
April 7th, 2009 at 2:18 am
What a great list! Good job, Blogball!
April 7th, 2009 at 2:18 am
Great list Blogball, thank you.
I found items 2 & 3 very interesting as well.
Now to item 9 Crystal Skulls, With due respect to the experts of the field I still consider these artifacts to be mysterious, as most have been located in their finished form in the Americas. The explanation to their mystery, as presented in your list, involves trans- Atlantic travel, long involved manufacture skills and a return trip to leave them in obscure locations. To what goal on the part of the artisans, would such extreme effort be worth undertaking?
And you mention that a lot of the displayed skulls have been removed from their public exhibition due to the very controversial status they still hold.
No, I still believe the skulls to be a mystery.
But overall–Good read.
April 7th, 2009 at 2:24 am
Great list, but then we expect this from Blogball.
I suspect that something typographical is missing from #5. 5 x 1020 should possibly be 5 x 10 to the power of 20 ie 5 followed by 20 zeroes. (This is sometimes written with a superscript “20″.) 1014 should possibly be 10 to the power of 14. Just my guess.
April 7th, 2009 at 2:29 am
Hehe, navel fluff! Also, bellybutton lint is also not from the shirts someone wears, but actually from their underwear. Friction throughout the day helps the belly hairs to capture the lint from the underwear and move it upwards until it becomes trapped in the bellybutton. Sorry if that doesn’t make sense, i’ve been up all night and i’m not very articulate this morning.
Great list!!!!
PS: do outies get as much bellybutton fluff as an innie? I’ve always wondered that…
April 7th, 2009 at 2:32 am
Dr Karl rocks!
April 7th, 2009 at 2:46 am
I love this site, and the list today is exceptional, but the one thing that gets me is the language. Come on… Weather (whether)? In site (Sight)?
April 7th, 2009 at 2:59 am
amazing list !!!!!!!!! fascinating..
#3 is the one that made me yell ‘WOW’
April 7th, 2009 at 3:06 am
@Carlos: No, not all of Canada was on fire. Canada is a huge place, after the fall of the USSR Canada was the largest country by land mass in the world, no forest fire could possibly get this big. Quite a few years ago when I was a child wild fires in Quebec turned the sky a very eerie shade of yellow and made it unusually dark for days here in nova scotia, which is hundreds of miles away.
April 7th, 2009 at 3:39 am
Another great list….your site is a daily “must read” for me Jamie, thanks.
April 7th, 2009 at 3:59 am
ewww..belly button lint..ewwww
April 7th, 2009 at 4:23 am
I never had lint in my bellybutton. Does that make me a freak of nature? This has been the best list produced in a long time. you cannot really go wrong with science type list. Great work Blogball.
It does not bother me but seeing that it pisses off so many pedantic people on the site I might aswell mention it. In the Interesting Fact section of #3 you used the word “theologize”, when I assume the word you meant was “theorize”. Thanks for another great list.
April 7th, 2009 at 4:25 am
@Manon Hmmm, interesting; Thanks for answering me, I appreciate it. And speaking of the sky turning colors, has any one here ever looked out side to see the sky give off the most vibrant color purple? I mean, to the point that it makes every thing outside appear to have a purplish tint? I remember the first time I seen that happen when I was little and I swore I was dreaming but then I seen it happen again. I tried looking it up a couple years ago and all I could find was something about the way the sun appears to be different colors as it sets and rises because of the different chemicals and weather conditions in the atmosphere. But from the way it was described in the explanation I found, it wasnt the same thing I was witnessing. So what I guess you could really say that I’m asking is, am I just crazy?
April 7th, 2009 at 4:49 am
Go Australia!
We are lint champions!
April 7th, 2009 at 4:57 am
Manon, I remember that day! I’m in Nova Scotia as well. Damn Quebecers, they light a fire and it has to affect half of Canada! It was the last day of school, I thought it was the end of the world, possibly because my mother is a Jehovah’s Witness and took this as a sign of Armageddon. But I’ll never forget that orangie dark day. I can understand how people viewed a day like that as supernatural.
April 7th, 2009 at 5:00 am
NOW THAT’S WHAT I’M TALKIN BOUT—Super list. Crystal Skull, who’d a thunk they wuz hand made.
April 7th, 2009 at 5:44 am
Very good list Blogball. Another feather in your cap.
April 7th, 2009 at 6:06 am
I’m so happy my belly is hairless..
This list was just plain cool
April 7th, 2009 at 6:14 am
Great list. i loved it!
April 7th, 2009 at 6:23 am
Great list and very informative, kudos Blogball.
Regarding the crystal skulls I seem to recall reading that it is believed a number of them were deliberately made (or commisioned) by a dealer in France who then sold them on at great profit by inventing wild stories about their origins. There was quite a vogue for the supernatural at the end of the 19th century and through the early 20th, I suppose such a thing would really pique the interest of antiquarians and supernaturalists of the day. I can’t quite remember where I read about it, I’ll have to see if I can find it.
April 7th, 2009 at 6:24 am
Very entertaining and well written list.
April 7th, 2009 at 6:28 am
Looks like my recollection was a little off, but there are interesting articles here:
http://www.britishmuseum.org/the_museum/news_and_press_releases/statements/the_crystal_skull.aspx
http://www.archaeology.org/0805/etc/indy.html
April 7th, 2009 at 6:30 am
I’ve actually seen the shark from #2.
Great list as usual.
April 7th, 2009 at 6:32 am
blogball: excellent work. this type of list is what got me first addicted to this site and i am sure many others.
in regards to #8, the explanation is somewhat lacking. it seems the rest of the list is answered with actual fact. the solution to the “dark day” is just a guess. as far as i know, tree rings just count in years. how could they possibly tell you what happened on a certain day in that year? while the fire may be a reasonable guess, it hardly means that the the mystery is solved.
April 7th, 2009 at 6:43 am
Awesome list! Barreleye fish are just amazing. I never thought of eyes inside your head! That gives a new meaning to the word ‘face’. I wonder if aliens could have evolved that way? Though for land organisms, would there be any good in having a transparent head and eyes inside?
o.0 freaky
April 7th, 2009 at 6:43 am
One of the best lists in a while.
No. 3 is mind boggling, how advanced Sumeria was.
April 7th, 2009 at 6:48 am
24. Manon
Russia is still the largest country in the world by landmass after the fall of the USSR. =P
April 7th, 2009 at 6:55 am
blogball – omg, you read my mind,i was going to start writing a similar list. i think instead i’m going to put in the link for the website i found, it has LOADS of debunked mysteries in it. i found it when i read the misteries of the world list and i googled the ica stones.
http://www.skepdic.com/
worth a look.
April 7th, 2009 at 6:56 am
apologies for the bad spelling, i’m real tired
April 7th, 2009 at 7:01 am
Woohoo!!! More scientific mysteries! Thank you for the list!
April 7th, 2009 at 7:01 am
This was so cool! I love learning new things and I only knew of one of these, so great list! (the shark was the only one I knew)
btw…if you clean your bellybutton daily…no lint! That bonus gave me a shudder. ewwwww!
April 7th, 2009 at 7:07 am
Who is this Science guy who solved all these things? Must be a pretty smart fellow. Oh wait, by “SCIENCE!!!”(TM) you just mean knowledge and logic like people have used for all of human history? Meh. There’s nothing new in worshipping Athena, you know.
April 7th, 2009 at 7:23 am
Very cool list. I heard something about the bees flying thing – that the original assertion that bees shouldn’t be able to fly were based on mass/wingspan calculations usually applied to aircraft. Another example of arrogant scientists overreaching themselves?
No. 3: Think you’ve got a typo there. Not sure the scientists meant to ‘theologize’ about the asteroid. Maybe they meant to theorise?
April 7th, 2009 at 7:29 am
Blogball:
Excellent list! A few of these I knew but most were completely new to me. I love lists where I learn something new!
Just as a side-note, though, the picture of the navel fluff made me gag… ewww!
April 7th, 2009 at 7:34 am
I thought New England’s dark day was caused by the New York Giants…
April 7th, 2009 at 7:37 am
My only problem’s number one. There wasn’t really that much of a problem with aerodynamic theory and bumblebee flight. We didn’t understand exactly how it worked, but nobody can track down the purported calculations that ‘proved’ that bumblebees couldn’t fly.
Here’s a link, though, to a 2000 study that demonstrated why they could:
http://www.news.cornell.edu/releases/March00/APS_Wang.hrs.html
April 7th, 2009 at 7:41 am
Ain’t science grand?
I always say:
The more we learn what is truth, the more we discover what is myth.
April 7th, 2009 at 7:48 am
I learned lots of new stuff today! Thanks Blogball! I am particularly interested in #3 having learned about it in school but we were left with “it could be this…” or “it may have been used for that…” Time to do some extra reading…
Great job, Blogball!
April 7th, 2009 at 8:07 am
nice list Blogball
The Barreleye Fish – one of the strangest creatures I’ve seen – creepy but fascinating.
April 7th, 2009 at 8:09 am
Fantastic list, Blogball! Of course, being the nerd of all things trivial, I knew almost all of them already (barring the bellybutton lint), but you made it so much fun to read and threw in so many bonus bits it was quite a treat!
32. Randall: Very good list Blogball. Another feather in your cap
You realize Randall, that with too many feathers in Blogball’s cap, something we are, even now, approaching critical mass, that Blogball will be able to fly? And that will be all our fault?
But…but wait a minute! That’s a good thing! We’ll tie a tablecloth around his neck, stitch a big B to the front of his shirt, and he’ll be Blogman, fighter for good in a world gone mad!
Yeah, I like it.
April 7th, 2009 at 8:11 am
In #4 – it was LakeHEAD University (in Thunder Bay, Ontario) that exhumed the body and did the DNA research. There is no Lakeland University.
April 7th, 2009 at 8:12 am
aww poor little fat bees haha. no but this was a really cool list!
April 7th, 2009 at 8:40 am
I would like to see the mystery of the crop circle be solved. I can only think that they are being made by extra-terrestrial beings. It seems that the cause of the design of the crop circles perhaps comes from an in the sky source.
April 7th, 2009 at 9:20 am
Great list, one of my all-time favourites:) And I had no idea we were such excellent mystery-solvers in Canada… go us!
April 7th, 2009 at 9:22 am
#3 was the most interesting one to me.That’s amazing. #2 sounds a little fishy(please excuse the pun)
April 7th, 2009 at 9:27 am
Cybogen- most the crop circles i’ve seen could easily be made by people. i have seen a few that are hard to explain, but if aliens were here why would they do nothing more then make a complicated pattern and disappear? i heard an explanation a while ago that the crop circles were made by people being directed from a hot air balloon, i dont think thats realistic but more real then aliens coming, drawing then leaving.
April 7th, 2009 at 9:32 am
Great list! I had never heard about the bees flying issues, though it kinda makes sense now that I look at them.
I was personally disappointed when they “debunked” the Face on Mars. Fortunately, there are other items in the Caledonia area that help perpetuate the oddity of the region, including a straight “wall” and a geometrically arranged grouping of small pyramids. Could still be all-natural, but the coincidence and concentration of unusual formations in that region is pretty high.
April 7th, 2009 at 9:33 am
r u kidding, Cybogen?
crop circles have been admittedly proven to be hoaxes…many college students have shown how easily this can be accomplished with some rope, a board, a field, and enough alcohol to entertain a group of students…
i bet you also are curious about lake monsters and ufos…
*awesome list, blogball! i appreciated the bumblebee info… i’m a bee nut! love dem bees!*
rtr
April 7th, 2009 at 9:35 am
58 Cybogen (re crop circles): I can only think that they are being made by extra-terrestrial beings.
Doesn’t that fly counter to your usual religious proselytizing?
April 7th, 2009 at 9:40 am
for you crop circle wanna-bees
http://science.howstuffworks.com/crop-circle5.htm
http://www.circlemakers.org/guide.html
http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2008/2008.html
enjoy enjoy! enjoy!!!
rtr
April 7th, 2009 at 9:40 am
Very cool list. I didn`t know about most of these things.
Except #7.
April 7th, 2009 at 9:50 am
sorry – Cydonia not Caledonia *sigh*
April 7th, 2009 at 9:52 am
Now explain why men have nipples! smartguy!
April 7th, 2009 at 9:58 am
That was really interesting. Thank you, Blogball.
April 7th, 2009 at 10:30 am
Fantastic list. The fish was especially interesting.
April 7th, 2009 at 10:40 am
Awesome list Blogball – as usual. I read about the eyeball dome fish a couple of weeks ago – way too cool.
Dischuker: I think they can date trees pretty accurately by tree rings. They can tell the age by a variety of means using this method. Here’s a link that explains it very well.
http://www.nytimes.com/1988/04/12/science/world-history-as-tree-rings-tell-it-gains-accuracy.html?sec=health&spon=&pagewanted=all
They can in fact count backward and by analyzing atmospheric particulates trapped in the wood see what was going on at a specific point in time.
April 7th, 2009 at 10:42 am
hey, v cool list Blogball – but you knew it would be – right? The Amphitheaters shape reminded me of audio speakers…? The skulls: The article doesn’t say what date these have been carbon dated to – and as they are rock crystal (calcium carbonate is it?) that shouldn’t be so hard. I personally think the mayans knew enough about circles to carve a circle out of a rock, and with a shaft of wood in it’s center could have made a simple sanding tool. Once again it comes back to “just ‘cuz we haven’t found it, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist”. The sharks were very interesting, and explains why the oldest killing machine has survived for those X million years. Finally, the Bee may have scientific potential, but come on.. how many millions of dollars and wasted hours does ’science’ really need to spend on checkers? Oh, thats just so important…
April 7th, 2009 at 10:51 am
Oh, ugh! Those dratted crop circles! They have been debunked over and over and yet people keep believing the least possible choice! Why? Do some people just need to believe in something so powerfully that they’ll choose the most ridiculous option?
**67. toecutter : Now explain why men have nipples! smartguy!
****
That one is too simple! As an early embryo we are all asexual, fitted out with the proper equipment for either sex. At about six weeks gestation, the hormones from the fertilized egg determine which sex the fetus will be, and the unneeded sexual organs are simply absorbed by the body (except in rare cases which I will not go into here). The nipples on male fetuses are left from the early days of fetushood.
April 7th, 2009 at 11:11 am
re no. six – the barrel eyed fish.
What are those things at the front of the head, that look just like eyes but are not eyes?
April 7th, 2009 at 11:20 am
Awesome list I agree with # 55 seque to many feathers can make you fly.
But we can ( Im sure ) depend on Skydiver to rescue any feather induced human falling out of the sky.
April 7th, 2009 at 11:29 am
you know what mystery isn’t scientifically solved? Why people still believe in religion
April 7th, 2009 at 11:58 am
@patrick1 i agree with you totally
April 7th, 2009 at 12:22 pm
Thanks for the comments Listversers!
I had a lot of fun researching this stuff.
whoopee(71) Those 2 little holes are olfactory organs called nares, (analogous to human nostrils)
Also, sorry for the silly mistakes like Weather (whether) In site (Sight) theologize( theorize)
Those kinds of mistakes seem to be par for the par for course every time I write a list.
I guess another mystery needs to be solved: How to invent a Blogball word checker.
April 7th, 2009 at 12:23 pm
Awesome list Blogball.
I’m dying to see a barreleye fish for realsies.
April 7th, 2009 at 12:24 pm
I meant par for course not par for the par for course.
See what I mean!
April 7th, 2009 at 12:25 pm
LOL @ “theorize” vs “theologize”.
April 7th, 2009 at 12:35 pm
Not gonna lie…. BEST LIST EVER. I was rather disappointed lately but this list is AMAZING!
April 7th, 2009 at 12:44 pm
I think its great that you can get an idea from the belly button lint what color shirts that wierdo liked to wear.
April 7th, 2009 at 12:57 pm
wonderful list. I remember how disappointed I was when the face of Mars was shown to be a coincidence. The virgin shark birth was a total shock to me.
April 7th, 2009 at 1:06 pm
To Whoopi(74)
I found a lot if information on the barreleye fish at
MBARI website -Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute. these are a couple of quotes from their article on the subject.
Regarding the two spots on the fish that look like eyes:
“the two spots above the fish’s mouth are olfactory organs called nares, which are analogous to human nostrils.”
The fish is a deep sea denizen:
“At depths of 600 to 800 meters (2,000 to 2,600 feet) below the surface,”
(Nit Pick note: I re-read the list entry (#6) and noticed that depth is calibrated at 2500m, should be feet. Sorry to be a nit pick.)
April 7th, 2009 at 1:19 pm
What Grace said must be echoed: There is no Lakeland University. The university in Ontario with “lake” in the name is Lakehaead.
http://www.lakeheadu.ca/
April 7th, 2009 at 1:48 pm
Wow… We made it all the way to comment 76 before someone brought up religion. I think that´s improvement!
I keep going back to the picture of the barreleye fish… It´s so funky looking with the transparent head…
Oh, and just a few tiny details that bugged the crap out of me when I watched the Indy Jones movie:
1- Apparently they land in Cuzco, Peru and take a short ride to the Nazca lines… They are actually not close AT ALL. I´m talking a good 18 hours by car.
2- For some reason we are shown as having Mexican music, dress, etc. Not to mention that our indiginous cultures are portryaed as Mayan (again, Mayas lived in Mexico… We had Incas, nazcas, etc). Do they even know that Mexico and Peru are two different countries??
Apparently, the film producers did not care to look at a map.
Rant over.
April 7th, 2009 at 1:58 pm
These are the best kinds of lists. The videos of the fish and theater acoustics are cool
April 7th, 2009 at 2:27 pm
Great List
April 7th, 2009 at 2:36 pm
theologize – if that’s nor a Freudian slip I don’t know what it
April 7th, 2009 at 2:47 pm
ahhh… that’s why i hardly ever get any lint in my bellybutton. awesome list.
April 7th, 2009 at 2:51 pm
FASCINATING…Definitely a redeemer of the previously-deleted “Common Sickness list (whatever)” that pissed a lot of listversers…keep it coming man…it’s bore-buster..thanks
April 7th, 2009 at 2:58 pm
Excellent list, blogball. I was trying to come up with the same list, only different ideas. My list was not nearly as good as this, though. Thanks for fascinating me yet again.
April 7th, 2009 at 3:37 pm
Awesome list! #1 reminded me of one of my favorite books from years ago – The Bumblebee Flies Anyway by Robert Cormier. Great book and great list!
April 7th, 2009 at 3:49 pm
What an ace list – well done Blogball!!
April 7th, 2009 at 4:09 pm
Anybody ever seen the man in the moon?
Yeah, I know it’s corney, but there really is a face there. The best (and I use the term loosly) picture I have found showing the man can be found here:
http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/9293/maninthemoontb9.jpg
Ignore the bottom two, the top picture attempts to show the cartoon man with a cartoon eye (missing), a button nose (missing) and a pony tail. Better shots of the moon show the ‘man’ much clearer.
April 7th, 2009 at 4:14 pm
Has anybody ever seen the man in the moon?
Yeah, I know it’s corney, but there really is a face there. The best (and I use the term loosly) picture I have found showing the man can be found here:
http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/9293/maninthemoontb9.jpg
Ignore the bottom two, the top picture attempts to show the cartoon man with a cartoon eye (missing), a button nose (missing) and a pony tail. Better shots of the moon show the ‘man’ much clearer.
April 7th, 2009 at 4:30 pm
Now if only someone would figure out that damn Voynich Manuscript.
April 7th, 2009 at 5:21 pm
In the picture of Graham Baker’s collection, why is 1984-1993 all green and sort of yellow,1994-2000 mostly pink and 2001-present all different colours? Weird. I wonder what makes it change colour…
April 7th, 2009 at 5:40 pm
Someone above mentioned carbon dating the crystal skulls. If you were to carbon date a rock, wouldn’t that just tell you how old the rock was, and not when it was shaped into whatever shape it was worked into? I’ve always wondered that. I mean really, shouldn’t a crystal carving say that it was as old as the earth when it’s carbon dated?
Just sayin’….
April 7th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
great and interesting list!
April 7th, 2009 at 6:51 pm
87. GTT – “details that bugged the crap out of me when I watched the Indy Jones movie”
If that bugged you, I strongly recommend not watching National Treasure 2. My sister enjoyed it but I despise it. (dunno why but I feel compelled to warn of the spoilers ahead). Apparently to Disney, the Olmec civilization created El Dorado in South Dakota. The Olmec civilization lived in present-day southern Mexico. We’re talking 2,000 miles of land between their civilization and their city of gold.
April 7th, 2009 at 8:11 pm
gabi319 (102):
You know, the worst part is that getting the facts right would not alter the movie at all! I mean, play the right music, have them land at the correct airport… Either that or set the damn movie in Mexico, not Peru! I went in hoping to see something about my country and got totally ripped off.
Well, on the bright side, I wasnt planning on watching NT2 at any time so it´s not you put a damper on any plans!
April 7th, 2009 at 8:13 pm
Amazing list! Thank you for sharing these great facts with us.
April 7th, 2009 at 8:26 pm
I only knew #10 and that’s because I’m greek. Great list and thanks for finally learning what causes the Epidaurus Theater Acoustics! As for: “It is still unknown whether the acoustic properties are the result of an accident or the product of advanced design.” I’m pretty sure that it was intentional. Since there were no microphones at that time they had to come up with a way to create acoustics for the spectators! If you visit the Tomb of Agamemnon you can notice that it the centre of the tomb there is the same amazing acoustics. Why they created such acoustics in a tomb is something I really don’t undertstand…
April 7th, 2009 at 8:35 pm
1000 x’s better then the made up real sickness list, that consequently, has been removed.
April 7th, 2009 at 8:37 pm
Im hairy and get a lot of navel lint, but I’m only 26 and am thin.
April 7th, 2009 at 9:04 pm
Wicked List
Segue #73:
Just like toecutter I’ve always wondered why men have nipples. In your response you said it was simple but then didn’t really answer the question fully. It seems pretty obvious to me that nipples on men are leftover from fetushood.
perhaps a better phrased question would have been: Why aren’t male nipples absorbed when the fetus figures out its a dude. especially since human fetuses have multiple nipples in early stages of development which are usually absorbed before birth. There doesn’t seem to be a definitive answer to this.
Basically what I’m saying is there’s no need to be such a know it all. No offence (I can be one too from time to time)
April 7th, 2009 at 9:05 pm
Great job Blogball! one of my favorite lists to date. I love the thing about the Bumblebee.
April 7th, 2009 at 9:38 pm
105. magdalena – “Why they created such acoustics in a tomb is something I really don’t undertstand…”
Theatrics. It has a lot to do with theatrics. I couldn’t find much about the Tomb of Agamemnon through google but I found something that said all the treasures where looted because the tomb has always been visible and open to the public…am I in the right avenue? A number of ancient structures were either an homage to the gods or to inspire awe in the laymen. Many ancient cultures would strategically position their ceremonial buildings so that the ruler or priest/shaman/etc. would stand at the steps, wave his hands and “magically” the sun would rise. The acoustics, I assume, would inspire that same awe and same other-worldly sensation when walking through Agamemnon’s tomb when one was visiting.
…or stealing…
April 7th, 2009 at 10:02 pm
excellent list
April 7th, 2009 at 10:04 pm
A couple answers here:
100: Carbon dating: Carbon dating tracks the isotope carbon-14, which is constantly present in the atmosphere due to solar radiation. It’s usually there at about the same concentration, and plants incorporate it regularly as part of their respiration (animals then eat those plants, or other animals that did eat those plants). When plants die (or are eaten), they stop taking in new C14 and the C14 present decays as isotopes normally do. By tracking how much C14 is present in something, knowing the amount that it started with and the rate of decay, we can figure out how long it’s been dead. The end result of this is, you can only carbon date things that were, at one point, alive – so crystal skulls are impossible to carbon date.
108: The fetus never ‘figures out’ that it’s male and not female. Genetics are not aware of the changes they make in the organism in question. The Y chromosome causes the fetus to develop male reproductive organs but does not specifically delete nipples from the chest, so males still grow nipples.
April 7th, 2009 at 11:11 pm
I WAS WILLIE CAMPBELL
April 8th, 2009 at 12:59 am
first time poster long time reader…
finally one of the other sides of the many listverse mystery coins
April 8th, 2009 at 1:17 am
It seems we never make any great scientific advances that are actually beneficial to mankind. You know, like finding the cure for AIDS, cancer, or any of the countless other diseases that there is no cure for. I’m not saying this wasn’t a great list, because I liked it, Blogball. I’m just saying that who really cares what the night sky looked like thousands of years ago? Or how a bumblebee flies, or how many moves there are in checkers? It all seems kind of trivial when people are dying constantly because of famine and epidemics running rampant in the less medically-advanced societies of the world, and even in our own advanced-yet-primitive “Utopia”, we have problems with countless other things that science has as of yet failed to counter.
April 8th, 2009 at 2:33 am
Yay, listverse back on track, one of the best lists in ages many thanks!
April 8th, 2009 at 3:20 am
talanic #112:
I know the fetus doesn’t literally figure out its sex I was just being a silly billy.
You still haven’t answered the question though (and I don’t expect you to because apparently no one really knows).
What I wanted to know is why doesn’t the Y chromosome ’specifically delete nipples’ from our chests.
The male sex chromosome of rats and mice manages to remove their nipples and our Y chromosome gets rid of the ovaries and the breasts and stuff, so all I’m saying is why leave the nipples.
April 8th, 2009 at 4:17 am
About number 1…my mother told me growing up (like, as early as 1995) that bees could fly because they beat their wings so fast, and that the design of the bee had inspired the helicopter.
I don’t know her sources, but it’s much earlier than ‘05.
April 8th, 2009 at 4:31 am
that god damn lint collection puts us Australians to shame.
who the hell collects shit out of their bellybutton.
seriously.
April 8th, 2009 at 4:52 am
115. illegal_immigrant
Understanding history and/or past cultures can help us understand how to function today.
Understanding the flight capabilities of bumblebees could open up new understandings of flight capabilities in Man.
Checkers, like chess, has more of a mathematical slant than a scientific one. This is greatly beneficial to the study of game theory which is used in…economics, politics and military theory off the top of my head.
There are agricultural advancements that include trying to grow crops in areas that cannot previously yield such vegetation.
There is a medicine that has thus far cured four dogs of cancer (may not seem fancy but seeing as they’ve used it in only four dogs, a 100% success rate seems pretty remarkable) and are at the moment trying see if there is potential for human use.
There are millions of scientists. They don’t all converge in one mystery at a time and solve it before moving on to the next. These people listed simply caught more lucky breaks than their colleagues.
Utopia’s kind of overrated. Look into history and the many horribly failed attempts to create utopia.
April 8th, 2009 at 5:08 am
117. samsung
Clown fish are capable of changing sexes. Salamanders can regenerate complete limbs….capabilities humans do not have. We are also likely incapable of complete nipple absorption you see in mice and rats. Yes we did start out with many nipples and reabsorbed all but two in respect to our “litter” producing capabilities. As to why men cannot reabsorb those two…I’ve never heard of specific chromosomes much less the Y chromosome (especially since segue and talanic have both rightly stated that nipples are not sex-linked characteristics) having the responsibility of reabsorbing vestigial organs but it’s early yet in gene mapping. Perhaps you will luck out in the near future. If they bother you too much to wait, then I recommend having them surgically removed.
April 8th, 2009 at 5:23 am
119. Georgia – “who the hell collects shit out of their bellybutton.”
Technically, no one has.
April 8th, 2009 at 5:51 am
I once had to take some medicine which, the teeny little slip of paper inside informed me, could cause lactation in men. Maybe that’s why men have nipples. Just in case
Seriously though, if men can lactate, wouldn’t that mean they still have breast tissue? I think they probably do, they can get breast cancer too. So the nipples are simply part of their vestigial breasts, ready to leap into action at the drop of a…um…pill.
April 8th, 2009 at 7:02 am
gabi_319…You’re right, but that doesn’t mean that some problems couldn’t already be solved if people, not just scientists, in general, tried a little harder. Don’t get me wrong, I love America, but we are the most wasteful nation on the planet. It goes to show that you don’t know what you have until it’s gone. People stuff their faces and restaurants until they’re full and beyond, and then when they get tired of eating, they have some busboy whisk away with the remnants of their food, which will be found in a trashcan hours later and eaten by a homeless guy who never imagined himself eating from a garbage bin. Sure, we’ve got soup kitchens where homeless people can come in, sit down, and enjoy a meal. Are we really helping them to improve their lives? No. Could we, if we tried? Yes. That’s just one problem, and it’s everywhere. I’ve seen a teen aged kid beat the shit out of a younger child who couldn’t have been more than 5. Over a muffin. The thing is, do they REALLY need the nutritional value of that muffin? Probably not, but people, as a whole, are far too concerned over living for themselves 100% of the time. So many things could be solved if the right minds aspired to do so, but we are mainly concerned with our own well-being. Sorry to rant like this, I could go on, but I feel that even this was too much.
April 8th, 2009 at 7:23 am
illegal_immigrant: plenty of resources are being tapped in attempt to find cures for the likes of AIDS, cancer, etc. Do you really think that by taking the scientists that study bee flight for example and throwing them at cancer research would result in finding a cure that much faster? Those kind of complaint scenarios are disingenuous IMO.
April 8th, 2009 at 7:24 am
124. illegal_immigrant
.
No, by all means, continue to rant…I enjoy reading rants
There are other issues to take into account (not only in the previous lists but also with your new angle on homelessness). Namely financial issues. Not to say that it’s moral but the money’s going to go where the moneygivers think the next new and/or lucrative venture is going to be. Grants are often so so hard to achieve. I’ve a grad student friend who’s boss has been trying to get a grant for years and years (just received one late last year. Nerd parties for grant offers are crazy, lol). So at least from a science department viewpoint, there’s one reason some projects are completed before others.
As far as social aspects… selfishness, for sure. I’ve always said working in human services (retail, IT, food, etc.) would be so much easier if the customers (especially the rude ones!) were required to work a certain period of time in retail and deal with the same crap they dealt to us. The view is definitely different on the other side of the counter. Don’t lose hope yet! There’s an increasing emphasis on philanthropic endeavors for the younger generations. I’m not sure how effective it is but Maryland students are required to volunteer a certain number of hours before qualifying for graduation.
As far as how to fix it. One person at a time. May not seem like much but that’s one less self-involved person.
April 8th, 2009 at 7:50 am
The Bonus jars of naval lint:
It looks like from 1994 to 2000 the collector went through his red hooded sweatshirt period.
Also 25 year collection of naval lint is the equivalent of a male chastity belt. Just a thought.
April 8th, 2009 at 8:03 am
Magdelena:
The so-called “Tomb of Agamemnon” (it’s usually called the “Treasury of Atreus”–no one knows whose tomb it actually was, and there are others very similar to it in the area surrounding Mycenae) is a beehive tomb of a type common to Greece during the late Bronze Age. These tombs grew out of a smaller, more compact form of cyst tomb where the body was interred with a number of grave goods (i.e., valuable booty and personal belongings, etc.). The beehive tombs (so called because their shape is very reminiscent of a beehive) were, like cyst tombs, dug into the earth and/or rock, built up with brick and/or stone, and then covered over once again with earth. They were not, however, meant to be hidden (as cyst tombs often are) since most beehive tomb that have been uncovered were augmented with immense arched doorways and “dromos” or paths cut into the earth which led up to the “entrance.” These tombs were almost certainly reserved only for royal personages or others of great importance, and were stocked with all kinds of valuable grave goods–some archeologists believing that all this was done in imitation of Egyptian burial practices, which the Bronze Age Mycenean Greeks were supposed to be familiar with (there are theories that the Greeks of this time served as mercenaries and/or allies in the army of the pharoahs, and so brought back not only Egyptian gold, but Egyptian fashion and practices, to Greece).
It’s because of the internal shape of the tombs–tapering to almost a point, some 30 feet above the ground level in some instances (in fact the Treasury of Atreus has the greatest open span without supports until Roman times) that they have such great echo qualities (well, the few that are intact, at any rate). This was probably not done intentionally, but was simply an accident of the design.
April 8th, 2009 at 8:03 am
haha, jayhawk
I can imagine a Monk-like closet with the same exact red hooded sweatshirt neatly hung in a row.
Where the pieces of lint the man pulled out really THAT big?! For some reason, these remind me of Fruit Pebbles. I’m swearing off cereal for the next decade or so.
April 8th, 2009 at 8:07 am
The fact that a man places Virgin Birth on the same list as Solving Checkers demonstrates why nature is phasing out the male.
April 8th, 2009 at 12:26 pm
130: QTKITTY – Do I detect a dry wit there, or just wishful thinking?
April 8th, 2009 at 1:49 pm
125. Maggot: Do you really think that by taking the scientists that study bee flight for example and throwing them at cancer research would result in finding a cure that much faster? Those kind of complaint scenarios are disingenuous IMO.
****
Hear hear! Maggot! And for those of us with extremely rare diseases, diseases for which the funding just isn’t there to study, the funds are still better off being used elsewhere, anywhere they have a chance of finding a cure.
April 8th, 2009 at 2:09 pm
“Seriously though, if men can lactate, wouldn’t that mean they still have breast tissue”
Yes men do have breast tissue just a lot less than women. As you correctly discern, that is why men can get breast cancer.
April 8th, 2009 at 2:15 pm
117. samsung: I didn’t answer your question any farther because you told me not to be such a know-it-all.
I’ve been on LV since almost the beginning and most of the folks expect a few of us to have most of the answers to most of the questions (we just happen to have advanced degrees, no big whoop, just true, and the advantage of age). However, once I’ve been asked not to answer, I don’t.
April 8th, 2009 at 2:40 pm
Spange (123):
Thank you for allowing me to bring up one of my favorite pieces of random trivia… Men can lactate. In fact, there have been a couple of cases where, due to extreme circumstances, men have been able to breat feed their children. Now if only I could get my husband to agree….
*****
illegal_immigrant:
Not to say I´m not with you on a lot of these points but you seem a little angry at the world… Like gabi319 said in comment 120, there are MANY aplications that can de developed from some of these discoveries, not the least of them being a better understanding of the history of mankind and the world around us. You also seem to be forgetting areas of specialty… Asking anthropologists to discover the cure for cancer is more than just a little illogical, dont you think?
April 8th, 2009 at 3:02 pm
GTT and Maggot, you’re both missing my points. I’m not saying EVERYONE and their mother should try to find a cure for cancer or AIDS or herpes, I’m saying that many of the problems that plague the world could and would be solved if everyone genuinely cared about the well-being of the next guy. There is so much unused and wasted talent floating around, that if more people got together and REALLY put forth an effort, half of the world’s problems would be solved.
April 8th, 2009 at 5:21 pm
Awesome list!
April 8th, 2009 at 5:57 pm
136. illegal_immigrant: While you have an excellent point, you miss an awfully important point yourself; many people’s talent lies in areas other than those medical. There are painters, writers, composers, singers, the players of instruments, actors, photographers, designers…and while these people may not be working toward a cure for any disease, they are certainly working to make the quality of life much more beautiful, improved, worth living.
That is something worth doing as well.
April 8th, 2009 at 6:00 pm
Samsung:
Your question still sounds like you’re ascribing conscious processes to genes, or putting the process backwards. Evolution doesn’t look at what’s needed and adapt the organism to fit; instead mutation occur at random, and if the mutant isn’t screwed over by the change, its offspring can inherit the mutation.
In other words, male rats didn’t lose their nipples because they didn’t need them. Instead, male rats that happened to not have nipples weren’t significantly weaker than male rats who did have them, so they wound up taking over the gene pool.
April 8th, 2009 at 6:42 pm
136. illegal_immigrant
Before you shake your head at what you’ve been reading in the previous comments… GTT, Maggot, segue…all of us get what your saying and agree to an extent. I think the issue is you don’t really see what we’re getting at. Yes, apathy is bad but this angry, ‘my way or the highway’, ‘one solution to end all problems’ aspect is extremely idealistic and frankly a bit naive.
Keep yourself informed about AIDs and about cancer research through published research and you’ll see that what we know now is far greater than what we knew ten years ago (there are a few cancers with a 80% survival rate…remember within this umbrella of CANCER are many different kinds of cancers that are treated differently). People do volunteer their time and company to those in need. People contribute their talents in a variety of fields as a way to advance the field and/or better the community…some just not in the way your comments appear like you’d want them to.
And I suppose part of the issue is you’re preaching about wasted talent to a number of people who have utilized their talents and live meaningful lives. Generalizations are hard to defend because there’s bound to be one or two (or fifty) people that are the exception to your rule. Particularly here where (if you’ve read a number of the lists) you’ll see that talent, intellect and life experience is most definitely not wasted.
April 8th, 2009 at 10:17 pm
#4. I’m also from Nova Scotia (Yay! Lots of us on here!) and people still leave stuffed animals and other children’s toys on that grave. I have a crayon rubbing of the stone as well.
April 8th, 2009 at 11:07 pm
To Tlanic, Samsung, and Segue. You are all wrong. Men have nipples so that we have a something to hang our keys on.
April 9th, 2009 at 12:47 am
135. GTT: “In fact, there have been a couple of cases where, due to extreme circumstances, men have been able to breat feed their children”
That is one of the most disturbing thoughts in the middle of a busy office day (speaking from a typically male perspective here…)!!!
*shudders*
April 9th, 2009 at 11:52 am
Here’s a perplexing mystery that I often wondered about…
Why does leg hair or armpit hair seem to stop growing after a certain length, yet the hair on your head can grow endlessly?
April 9th, 2009 at 4:39 pm
144. damien_karras: Why does leg hair or armpit hair seem to stop growing after a certain length, yet the hair on your head can grow endlessly?
****
It can’t. Head hair has a stopping point, which is different for everyone. Mens beard hair is also on a length leash, some men can grow long, flowing beards, while others grow peach fuzz all their lives.
Womens head hair can grow longer than mens head hair. Many women can’t get their hair to grow past shoulder blade length. Others waist length. A few can get it to grow to knee length or longer (but that is very, very rare). It seems to be connected to thickness.
For example, I have extremely thick hair. That is, each individual hair is thick and I have an unusual amount of them, so it’s thick+thick. I usually have my hair long, as in to my waist long. When I was young, in Uni., I could sit on my hair.
Friends of mine, with thin hair, would complain that they could not grow their hair any longer than shoulder length.
I’ve asked beauticans about this and have gotten this answer. So. Nothing is forever. With hair, anyway.
April 9th, 2009 at 8:18 pm
Wow! great list. Very interesting to read.
Thanks.
April 9th, 2009 at 8:31 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antikythera_mechanism
April 9th, 2009 at 9:43 pm
“Head hair has a stopping point”
It was my understanding that hair doesnt stop growing, it merely falls out after a certain length. This also explains why thicker hair can grow longer. But then I’ve never stopped to think about it!
Can anyone shed some light?
April 9th, 2009 at 11:31 pm
“Head hair has a stopping point”
It was my understanding that hair doesnt stop growing, it merely falls out after a certain length.
One and the same, sir. I suppose it would work to clarify that the hair follicle continues to produce hair but the hair strand stops at a certain point (I’m no hair expert but I assume the muscle supporting the hair strand can only handle so much weight). The hair strand is pushed out as a new strand grows. …unless the follicles stop producing hair and there you have baldness!
April 10th, 2009 at 9:39 am
#2. I was just at that zoo a couple of hours ago….. lol.
Also, i was very fascinated by the Crystal skulls…. But it would seem that those people who just cannot accept fun must ruin it for all of us again! Why must they remove all of our superstitious beliefs. In the name of science? Oh well.
April 10th, 2009 at 11:04 am
HAIR!!!
Goddamn it…. why can’t people just do some research? Here! Again, from Cecil Adams “Straight Dope” page (this is the third time in a week I’ve had to do this):
“What makes you think scalp hair grows indefinitely? Didn’t you ever listen to the title song from Hair (“Don’t never have to cut it ‘cuz it stops by itself”)? Each scalp and beard hair grows two to six years before stopping, attaining a typical maximum length of two to three feet. Then it becomes dormant for about three months, whereupon a new hair starts growing and pushes the old one out of the follicle from behind. That’s why even someone who’s not balding loses 70 to 100 head hairs a day. By comparison, the growth cycle for other body hair is only a few weeks.
Maximum scalp-hair length varies greatly among individuals. The all-time champ had 10-1/2 feet, although Diane Witte of Worcester, Massachusetts, is said to be closing in fast. Diane, whose hair grows at the rate of a half-inch per month, had 10-1/4 feet as of 1988 and by now has surely broken the record. Cecil’s staff contacted Ms. Witte in hopes of being there for the historic finale, but we were unable to agree on terms. No matter. I’m sure it’ll turn up eventually on “Wide World of Sports.”"
April 10th, 2009 at 11:35 am
Randall, thank you for backing me up on this. I went to beauticians for the answer, you go to Cecil Adams (a fine source for darn near anything), and we come away with the same answer…right down to it varying among individuals.
I have no idea how long my hair could get if I just let it grow, because I have never let it get any longer than long enough to sit on, then I cut it back ti it’s usual waist length. My beautician is of the opinion that my hair would be one of the rare cases where it could get to knee length or longer. I have no desire to know.
April 10th, 2009 at 5:12 pm
“Diane, whose hair grows at the rate of a half-inch per month”
HALF INCH PER MONTH?! I’m jealous. I’ve been donating my hair to Locks of Love since high school but it takes roughly two and a half years to get to donatable length (10 inches).
April 10th, 2009 at 5:16 pm
Randall, do you live near a puppy slaughtering facility?
I ask only because you seem to be constantly angry with everything!
April 10th, 2009 at 7:04 pm
Segue and gabi319, I know you guys get my point. I was in one of those moods where I was pissed and bothered by something that has no place here. Oh well. I just read the newer list about the Wild West fellows and my mind has wandered off on a different tangent.
April 11th, 2009 at 8:49 am
10-1/4 feet of hair? Holy cow that’s alot of dough spent on shampoo!
April 11th, 2009 at 10:54 am
What about the missing Romanov children, Anastasia and Alexi? There was a low key article published on cnn.com a few weeks ago saying that their bodies had been found and successfully identified, thus ending the mystery. What a terrible omission.
April 11th, 2009 at 6:48 pm
155. illegal_immigrant – “I was in one of those moods where I was pissed and bothered by something that has no place here.”
Hope you are feeling better. If not and you live in California, you can visit the Smash Shack and throw dishes and glassware at the walls. I think it would be an effective way to vent anger since they are technically not your dishes anyway.
April 12th, 2009 at 7:11 am
Gabi_319:
No way, you’re kidding me…
I just Googled Smash Shack…
I can’t believe there’s a place so lovely in the whole world… I’ll make a point to visit it when I’m passing through California at some point in my life.
That’s one of the coolest things anyone’s mind has ever conceived. And yet, so simple!
April 13th, 2009 at 6:24 am
cymbaconandeggsagoogan:
Yes, I AM rather angry quite a bit, aren’t I? My therapist always told me to meditate more. But I found meditating only made me seethe with rage, so I stopped.
BTW, re: puppies… my oldest daughter (who shares my propensity for disdain for a number of things in our world) has a great slogan for the hated Corporation of the Mouse that she wants to have embossed on bumper stickers or the like:
“Everytime a puppy dies, Disney gets a dollar!”
I like it. I see it in some happy, colorful font that the kids will love, plastered on cars and walls all over the country. She’s a genius.
April 14th, 2009 at 11:16 am
Randall, I love it that you get onto people for not doing their own research. Perhaps, by asking the question, they feel they are doing their research? Just sayin!
April 14th, 2009 at 4:13 pm
161. MisterSir : Perhaps, by asking the question, they feel they are doing their research?
****
Hmmmm? I wonder what would happen if injected some of the mold growing in this petri dish into a sick person?
Whoa! Am I exhausted! This research is killing me. Asking questions alla time. Maybe someone should be hired to find the answers.
April 14th, 2009 at 5:18 pm
finally a comprehensive study on belly button lint!!!!! AWESOMWE!!!!! that was the type of thing i thought about doing as a six year old!! haha
June 10th, 2009 at 2:50 am
Skepticism shouldn’t count as something “solved”. The Face on Mars is a much deeper subject than a few web-published images.
Every skeptic thinks science is on their side.
June 10th, 2009 at 2:59 am
164 8bit : “…The Face on Mars is a much deeper subject than a few web-published images…”
Woah dude, my hands are so big… they can touch anything but themselves… Oh… wooooaaahh…
July 7th, 2009 at 6:40 pm
If by any chance you can answer this question, I will be greatly appreciative: do bumblebees have belly buttons. . . as you can imagine, this is the Google search that I did and, while I was indeed fascinated by your number 1 mystery solved AND your interesting details on navel fuzz, my original quest remains just that – a quest. Can you help?
July 15th, 2009 at 4:18 pm
Rev. Deb, bugs grow in eggs.
July 16th, 2009 at 12:21 am
Why are none of these physics problems? Is it a more mature field or just less accessible to the layperson?