This list takes a look at some important and well intentioned inventions that eventually ended up causing catastrophe through environmental damage or loss of life. All of the inventors were honest scientists who were trying to improve the world, but unfortunately ended up doing quite the opposite. This list is in no particular order.
Fritz Haber was a Nobel Prize winning Jewish scientist who created cheap nitrogen fertilizer and also made chemical weapons for the German side in World War I. It was his creation of an insecticide mainly used as a fumigant in grain stores that was responsible for the deaths of an estimated 1.2 million people. His Zyklon B became the preferred method of execution in gas chambers during the Holocaust.
Arthur Galston developed a chemical that would speed the growth of soybeans and allow them to be grown in areas with a short season. Unfortunately in high concentrations it would defoliate them and it was made into a herbicide even though Galston had grave concerns about its effects on humans. It was supplied to the US government in orange striped barrels and 77 million litres of Agent Orange were sprayed on Vietnam causing 400000 deaths and disabilities with another 500000 birth defects.
Richard Jordan Gatling invented the Gatling gun after he noticed the majority of dead from the American Civil War died of illness, rather than gunshots. In 1877, he wrote: “It occurred to me that if I could invent a machine – a gun – which could by its rapidity of fire, enable one man to do as much battle duty as a hundred, that it would, to a large extent supersede the necessity of large armies, and consequently, exposure to battle and disease would be greatly diminished.” The Gatling gun was used most successfully to expand European colonial empires by ruthlessly mowing down native tribesmen armed with primitive weapons.
Joseph Wilbrand was a German chemist who discovered trinitrotoluene in 1863 for use as a yellow dye. It wasn’t until 1902 that the devastating power of TNT as it is better known was fully realized and it was adopted as an explosive in time for extensive use by both sides in World War I, World War II. It is still in military use today.
Thomas Midgley discovered the CFC Freon as a safe refrigerant to replace the highly toxic refrigerants such as ammonia in common use. This resulted in extensive damage to the Ozone Layer. His other famous idea was to add tetraethyl lead to gasoline to prevent “knocking” thus causing worldwide health issues and deaths from lead poisoning. He is considered to be the man that – “had more impact on the atmosphere than any other single organism in Earth’s history.”
Dr. Gerhard Schrader was a German chemist specializing in the discovery of new insecticides, hoping to make progress in the fight against hunger in the world. However, Dr. Schrader is best known for his accidental discovery of nerve agents such as sarin and tabun, and for this he is sometimes called the “father of the nerve agents”.
Sir Marcus Laurence Elwin Oliphant was the first to discover heavy hydrogen nuclei could be made to react with each other . This fusion reaction is the basis of a hydrogen bomb. Ten years later, American scientist Edward Teller would press to use Oliphant’s discovery in order to build one. However, Oliphant did not foresee this – “We had no idea whatever that this would one day be applied to make hydrogen bombs. Our curiosity was just curiosity about the structure of the nucleus of the atom”.
Despite a lifelong passion for astronomy and a dream that rockets could be used to explore space, Wernher von Braun’s talents were used to produce the Nazi V2 rocket which killed 7,250 military personnel and civilians and an estimated 20,000 slave laborers during construction. Later in the US he developed a series of ICBM rockets capable of transporting multiple nuclear warheads around the globe before redeeming his reputation with the Saturn V rocket that put men on the moon
Frederick Roberts, 1st Earl Roberts set up “refugee camps” to provide refuge for civilian families who had been forced to abandon their homes for one or other reason related to the Boer War. However, when Lord Kitchener succeeded Roberts as commander-in-chief in South Africa in 1900, the British Army introduced new tactics in an attempt to break the guerrilla campaign and the influx of civilians grew dramatically as a result. Kitchener initiated plans to- “flush out guerrillas in a series of systematic drives, organized like a sporting shoot, with success defined in a weekly ‘bag’ of killed, captured and wounded, and to sweep the country bare of everything that could give sustenance to the guerrillas, including women and children.” Of the 28,000 Boer men captured as prisoners of war, 25,630 were sent overseas. The vast majority of Boers remaining in the local camps were women and children. Over 26,000 women and children were to perish in these concentration camps.
Anton Köllisch developed 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine as a by-product of research for a drug to combat abnormal bleeding. It was largely ignored for 70 years until it became popular in the dance clubs of the early 80s. It was only when the Rave culture of the late 80s adopted Ecstasy as its drug of choice that MDMA became one of the top four illegal drugs in use killing an estimated 50 people a year in the UK alone. Its inventor died in World War I.






























I’d imagined leaded petrol and CFCs would be no. 1 & Edward Teller was the archetypal stupid clever person!
Interesting list though.
Wow sad list but intresting none the less.
wow,…………….
This is a great list! i like how its mostly devoid of biasness and it really tries to defend the inventor of some of the worst inventions of the last 100 years. While showing how cruel we can be.
@Greg (4): I agree – this is a great first list for the contributor – it is very interesting
Personally, I don’t see how you have Ecstasy as the number one useful invention that went bad.
I know that it may sound terrible, but I laughed when I saw number 10. I just opened up a new tab with this on it thinking “this should be pretty interesting” and then I saw Zyklon B. It was a terriblet thing that Nazi’s did with it, but it was more humane than the previous way of doing it.
Maybe Himmler did have a conscience after all.
I agree, this is a great list. I’m a science nerd so I find it fascinating how such products have been found for example ecstasy.
@l3lazec (6): nor me, not when the death of jews is mentioned twice… How many million more of them were killed.
Anyway, it was a great list. A lot more informayive than recent ones. Oh and OMG, is that how the vietnamese were treated??? That’s sick.
*informative
Unforeseen and unpredictable guns and rifles on the list, G.
Whodathunk atom-splitting would reek (wreak, wreck) so much havoc yo?
@Chineapplepunk (9): Just throwing it out there that the list probably isn’t ordered… Not in the least because the title is “10 Useful Inventions That Went Bad,” nothing about being the Top 10
what about Thalidomide, it was used to help women with morning sickness and cause 1,000s of birth defects
Ecstasy is not nearly as dangerous as it’s made out to be, at least not in its pure form MDMA. People often cut it with other things like caffeine, amphetamines and even cocaine to make it cheaper thus making it more dangerous. Also most people who die from it die from dehydration where they don’t have any friends with them to tell them they need to drink after dancing so much. Why is heroin not up there instead?
Ecstasy, according to wikipedia, is less dangerous then *****. I’ll stick with the pot either way.
Interesting fact about Thomas Midgley, his reputation of bad inventions followed him to his death when a complex system of pullys and strings he invented to help him with a disability ended up strangulating him!
@JJjames (14): I think that’s a bit narrow-minded. I doubt that the only effects of ecstasy is the damage – or lack of
– to the “congestee”.
@Mark: Yeah maybe but I’m not saying take drugs but there is no point just scaring people like governments do. If they told the truth everyone would be much better off. Whatever laws they put in people are always going to take drugs so it would be better to inform people so they take the least harmful drugs and stop wasting their money implementing the regulations over them. Also the long-term effects are not fully known but most respectable scientists who have carried out tests on this say that if there are any they will probably be largely insignificant. It’s up to the user to know what they should do if they take the drug and weigh up the risks but as long as they are not harming anyone else, (which on ecstasy it’s far more likely that they will be hugging instead of harming) it should be their own choice what they put into their bodies.
i see, i see. these people would be turning in their graves!
Maybe I’m just showing my lack of knowledge in this area as it’s been years since I studied it, but wouldn’t it be Nuclear Fission, not Fusion? I always thought the Bomb was a fission reaction.
Actually you are 'half right' – the hydrogen bomb is a fusion device but its triggered by a fission reaction. So its actually a fission-fusion bomb with the fission stage being relatively small (kiloton range) and the fusion stage being very large (megaton range)
i love it!
@JJjames (18): Yeah, I guess that’s reasonable. As long as some random on LV can’t possibly conceive how drugs could possible cause harm outside of adverse effects to the takers’ bodies then I guess governments should legalize drugs…
You obviously think you could take drugs responsibly. You probably can, good for you. I’m sure there are people out there who could drive safely at 120km/h, maybe even 140, 150. But then there are people that can’t be trusted to hit 60 – me! – so the government imposes speed limits to protect the majority. Drivers can cause damage, so can drugs. I hate arbitrary laws more than anything else in the world, yet I can follow that logic.
It is funny that there is so much good that can be accomplished with science, like the small pox vaccine for example, and so much destruction that can be brought about at the same time.
So many lives both saved and destroyed. It’s crazy how things work out sometimes.
Outstanding list!
@MArk: Nah it’s more the fact that it doesn’t really work. For example in the Netherlands where ***** is legal the percentage of users is lower than in the UK where it is a class B drug
@brandiwine (13): I totally agree with you – should have been on the list
great list…
btw i noticed that all lists on this site always mention is the subject at hand is jewish or not which is kinda strange but being a jew myself i think it’s awesome
The Large Hadron Collider at CERN could top the lot – if that were to go bad we would all be in trouble.
i was hoping to see less on explosives / war and more on something else… but whatever
pretty nice
@JJjames (24): Thank you for pointing out that widely overlooked fact. [/sarcasm]
I think you’ll also find that there are more violent crimes per capita in the UK than in the Netherlands. OMG!!!! I just proved that drugs cause violent crime!!!!! Or maybe, just a crazy, crazy leap-of-faith of logic here, cultural differences might account for some discrepencies.
Sorry if I like my logic de-fallaciated.
No mention of DDT?
@Mark (22): I think I have raised this issue before – but what about the idea of legalizing all drugs but only via prescription. Then the govt has a list of users and extra tax money to build rehab centers for those who need it and want it. That makes drugs cheap – so lessens drug crimes and provides a non-judgemental place for rehabilitation.
@flgh (29): I think DDT would be on the opposite list – 10 inventions considered bad that are actually good. DDT is one of the most effective aids in the fight against malaria. It is wrongly stigmatized IMHO.
@jfrater (30): You sure have. I think it’s preferrable to a wholesale “take what you want, why should we care” approach. But I’m not convinced, I’m obviously a rather prudent person on some issues (which, if you knew me well, would suprise you as much as it does me).
And rehab’s never going to be non-judgemental.
@Mark: Yeah but violent crimes aren’t legal in Netherlands
Also, if the government doesn’t tax the hell out of the newly legalized drugs I would be extremely surprised. I know you’re a smoker, and let’s face it, the tobacca industry is the prime example of the government wanting a cut. Tobacco – in commercially available form – is dangerous there’s no rationalizing it, there’s no “moderation” here, there are far too many studies tying it to cancer/s.
Can you see government administered drugs turning out much differently?
@jfrater (31): Funny I could say the same thing about TNT and open-cut mines
“10 More Useful Inventions That Went Bad”
Can’t wait
@JJjames (33): Well done failing to address anything that I brought up in my previous comment. If you’re going for the quick and disgraceful way out of this debate, you’re going it well.
@Mark: This mass-debate may be disgraceful, but it sure isn’t quick or going well
@fishin(20): The atomic bombs that were used in World War II were fission bombs, yes. However, most countries with a modern nuclear weapons program possess two-stage thermonuclear weapons (aka hydrogen bombs). In these nuclear fission (first stage) is used to ignite and initiate the second phase. If you want to learn more about how weapons that use nuclear fusion operate look up the Teller-Ulam nuclear weapon design.
On another note… so the gatling gun went bad by… killing more people? I’m not sure that quite qualifies for a “good invention gone bad.” Even though the inventor made terrible assumptions about how it would be implemented , its intention was always still to mow down someone.
I guess I feel that nuclear fusion hasn’t really done anything bad AS YET, whereas fission killed a hell of a lot of people. So I think fusion doesn’t really belong on the list. Yet.
Bad things happen all because of good intentions. Fits this list perfectly. That gatling gun….wow. Want to get more people then disease. What sick thinking on that one.
Cool list, djalabajoe.
@JJjames (37): How is it disgraceful? The debate is neccesary, without it, people like you wouldn’t be getting heard at all. It’d be me all the way.
IMO slowly is the way to go. Keep an acceptable status quo until we can think of an even better way to change it, one that we can agree on. Because after all, last time we changed the status quo in finance, we created the largest economic downturn since the Great Depression.
@mark: Yeah it was a really bad joke, you’ve made good points(Y)
@oouchan (40): What’s really funny looking back at it is the fact that this guy couldn’t deduce that when – not even a question of if – the enemy got these weapons, you were going to have to to match them for manpower again. It was just going to lead to proportionately equal sized armies, albeit with much bigger, deadlier weapons.
concentration camps were first used by the Spanish a few years before the British copied the idea… Kitchener shouldn’t be credited with the invention
the spanish ones were technically internment camps and not concentration camps, so…
Fantastic list. I do agree with the people who have already mentioned ecstasy though, how it made it on to a list like this, especially at number one, is quite strange.
Having said that the rest is very interesting, if somewhat depressing.
I really expected to see Nobel on this list he had to invent a peace award after he saw how people used dynomite.
You should have added the ski mask. I mean the guy who invented it must of had the greatest of intention only to have it be made infamous for its use in crime
50 kills per day and you put ecstasy in number 1, besides things like sarin gas and concentration camps??
I agree – Ecstasy just doesn't work for me as number one. Heroine is a better example, it is far deadlier, killing thousands of addicts each year. Its original use was as a painkiller/anesthetic. In fact Karl Marx's statement about "religion is the opiate of the masses" is completely misunderstood today.Today we take it to mean that he was denouncing religion as addictive and dangerous, when in fact he meant that religion is soothing and comforting to those in (emotional) pain.
And as per Calvin and Hobbes, the says "he ain't seen nothing yet!"
@Petarded, its 50 kills a year, not day. More people die in car accidents a year then that so essentially the Car is worse then ectascy as it destroys the planet and straight forward kills people
Sorry i meant per year.
Given that Werner von Braun knew full well that his V2 rockets were being created using the slave labour mentioned in the very next entry after his I don’t think that he ‘redeemed his reputation’ with the Saturn V.
The man was brilliant, but he was also an amoral scumbag of the highest order who would surely have been sentenced to death at the Nuremberg trials if he hadn’t been deemed too valuable to kill. The Saturn V would have still been invented, at most a couple of years later than it was.
Good list though.
2. Concentration Camps
While 26,000 women and children were to perish in these concentration camps thousands and thousands more women, children and natives starved of exposure and hunger as the British troops burnt, looted and devestated their crops and homesteads.
Ironicly one of the worst cases of “Useful Inventions That Went Bad” were the pass laws implemented by the British under colonial rule.
With the idea to protect indigenous peoples from flocking to the colonial white city’s and thus loose their cultural background and leaving their families back home in destitute, The Natives’ Land Act of 1913 [1] was the first major piece of segregation legislation passed by the Union Parliament. The subsequent Native Urban Areas Act of 1923 deemed urban areas in South Africa as “white” and forced all black African men in cities and towns to carry permits called “passes” at all times . When South Africa got it’s independance in 1961 and became a Republic these laws remained a cornerstone of Apartheid until the 1990′s when it was replaced by the current policy of land restitution.
Hey, I think you need to add that the people that died in the concentration camps in #2 died of disease. I think it needs to be added cos when people say concentration camps they automatically think of the purposeful murder that occurred during WW2.
ah, you bet me to it
Hang on, no you didn’t, lol. And I think the numbers of those that died of disease in these camps was about 28,000 Boers and about 14,000 black Africans. Its interesting to note, that when the British closed these camps to new entrants, it sped up the end of the war. As the mobile Boer forces were left with the impossible task of trying to look after and feed the starving populace in their areas.
@Yawyack (53):
If you accept holding captured war weakened women and children dying of malnutrition and contagious diseases in tents without any infrastructure or protection during bitter cold winters in concentration camps and don’t think of it as “murder” I would hate to be at your mercy .
The British called this their “Scorched Earth Campaign”
Excellent contribution djalabajoe; interesting how we humans can find the worst possible use for everything.
Kind of a pity about MDMA, LSD, Heroin, Weed and a host of other recreational drugs. Hysteria and misguided laws have and are preventing legitimate use and research into their properties. There is hope – the FDA has recently approved Ecstasy for human research. In the articles I’ve read it seems to be a very promising tool for Psychiatric intervention. I’ve heard similar claims for LSD.
Jfrater: I agree with your drug policy. Laws have never prevented addicts from getting their drug of choice; just makes criminals out of addicts and provides organized crime with an obvious cash flow bonanza. Legalize it, tax it. Provide treatment for those who want it. All good.
i dont know why ecstasy is number one on this list.. for instance just look at the use of alcohol and alcohol related deaths in comparison to ecstasy. i dont think it should be on this list at all let alone number one.
@tripsyman
Precisely how is the LHC supposed to “go bad”? All particle accelerators do is replicate what nature has been doing for billions of years. Every day countless millions of high-energy collisions take place in the upper atmosphere with far more energy than the LHC can generate…and guess what? We’re still here.
Its because tripsyman has been listening to the 'its going to create mini black holes and destroy the earth' nonsense. Morons – learn some basic physics…
Well, at least Von Braun got us to the moon.