The concept of Christmas comes from the stories of a virgin birth. Below are ten stories that are no less bizarre – from the weird science to just plain weird. The stories may be wide and varied but there are some parameters that were set prior to making this list. You won’t find any stories of children born with congenital physical anomalies (although if you want to share some, please do so in the comments!). Any record-holding moms or babies had to have survived through the child’s infancy. These stories came as I found them and the only real “ordering” was done to put similar stories next to one another.
Mia Washington had twin boys but her husband is the biological father of only one. Washington had an usual case of birthing fraternal twins with two separate fathers. This story has become more common because of occasional in-vitro treatment tales of lab error in which a few eggs were contaminated with the wrong sperm, however, Washington’s story unfolds much more naturally. She first became pregnant when having a little fun with either her husband or lover. Very soon afterwards, she met up with the other man and a second egg was released and fertilized. This is a medical rarity known as heteropaternal superfecundation and only a handful of cases have ever been documented. When the two babies were born and one looked nothing like the father, the truth was discovered. Mr. Washington adopted Mia’s other son and took the fatherly role for both children.
The chances of a mixed-race couple having twins who look as if they are different races are a million to one but there are occasional stories that pop up about them, like Kian & Remee Hodgson (above) and Ryan & Leo Gerth. A British couple has become even more of an exception by having TWO sets of twins who look remarkably different. Miya and Leah Durrant were born in December 2008 and their older sisters Hayleigh and Lauren were born seven years earlier. Miya has the black hair and dark complexion of her father Dean Durrant and older sister Hayleigh while Leah has blue eyes and paler skin just like mom Alison Spooner and older sister Lauren.
In 2008 and at the age of 70, Rajo Devi became the oldest woman to give birth. She and her husband had unsuccessfully tried to conceive all throughout their 50 years of marriage and thought it was impossible after she went through menopause in her late 50s. However, after entering a fertility program at an in-vitro clinic, Devi was successfully impregnated by a donor egg that was fertilized with the sperm of her 72 year old husband. On December 6th, she gave birth to a baby girl and both mother and daughter are healthy. Latest reports claim that the happy septuagenarians are attempting IVF again in hopes of having a baby boy.
Lina Medina of Peru holds the record as the world’s youngest mother when she gave birth to her son on May 14, 1939. Lina was only five years old at the time. Her son, Gerardo, spent his childhood believing his grandmother was his mother and his true mother was his older sister. He died at the age of 40 from bone marrow disease but there was no indication that his unusual birth had anything to do with his problem. Although studies about the pair are hard to find, what is known is that both mother and son were both healthy and suffered no visible affects of such a bizarre birth. Lina married in 1972 and gave birth to her second child that same year – 33 years after Gerardo had been born. To this day, Gerardo’s biological father is unknown and Lina refuses to disclose that information.
James Elgin Gil was born May 20, 1987 in Ottawa, Canada and is the world’s youngest surviving premature baby. He was born 21 weeks and 5 days into gestation (more than 18 weeks too early). To understand the gravity of the situation, one should know that the survival rates for premature babies born at 22 weeks is less than 10%. Many hospitals will refuse to give medical attention to babies born before the 22 week mark. This baby lucked out by weighing a “hefty” 1.1lbs (482 g) at birth, which increased his chances of survival. The title for tiniest single baby goes to Amillia Sonja Taylor of Florida, USA (above). She was born at 21 weeks and 6 days but weighed only 10 ounces (283 g). Remarkably, the hospitals where both of them were born decided to bring the babies to intensive care and they are now both healthy and doing fine.
The record for birthing the world’s heaviest (surviving) newborn belongs to Sig. Carmelina Fedele of Aversa, Italy. In September 1955, she gave birth to a baby boy who weighed 22 lb 8 oz (10.2 kg) but not much else is known about the boy. Second place belongs to a boy born in September 2009 weighing 19 lb 3 oz (8.7 kg). The name of the child wasn’t released but what is known is that he was born to an Indonesian woman with a history of diabetes. Due to insulin problems, diabetic women tend to have larger than average babies. Her three previous children were also heavier-than-average kids but this little boy was significantly larger!
There’s an alarming amount of stories to be found of babies born near or even in the toilet but Bhuri Kalbi’s daughter has the distinction of being born while mom was on a toilet of an Indian train. Kalbi was only seven months pregnant when she rode this particular train so she hadn’t anticipated the outcome of her trip to the bathroom. She felt like she needed to use the toilet but what actually happened was a Precipitous Birth, or a quick birth commonly associated with pregnancy complications. Toilets on Indian trains are chutes that empty directly onto the tracks so after the precipitous birth, Kalbi’s baby fell through the hole and onto the tracks as the train was in motion. After receiving the alert, staff at a nearby station found the baby girl still alive on the tracks.
Carolina Chirindza gave birth to her baby Rositha in a tree. In 2000, Chirindza’s home in Mozambique was overcome by rapidly-moving high floodwaters so she climbed up a tree to avoid the crocodile-infested waters. For four days without food or water, she waited for rescue. Baby Rositha was born on the fourth day and fortunately, a South African military helicopter rescued them shortly thereafter. There is also a tree birth story from Papua New Guinea. The pregnant Nolan Yekum and her husband were hung from a tree after being accused of witchcraft. She gave birth mere moments before she and her husband freed themselves from their nooses and went into hiding. Eventually both tree babies and moms were admitted into the hospital and given a good bill of health.
Their names are Annette, Cecile, Emilie, Marie and Yvonne but they are better known as the Dionne Quints. They are the only recorded set of identical quintuplets and one of the very few sets of naturally-conceived high multiples to survive infancy. In May 28, 1934, the Dionne Quints were born to the impoverished Elzire and Oliva Dionne of Canada. When the quints were nine months old, they were taken from their parents and became wards of the state to live in an estate that became known as Quintland. There, they lived a rigid schedule consisting of either medical testing or structured playtime outdoors in the observatory field where tourists could watch them without interacting with the children. In fact, they had very little contact with people aside from the nurses and house staff. When they were nine years old, their parents won back custody of the children but they continued the girls’ “fish-bowl” existence with various engagements, photo-ops, tourist attractions, etc. to turn a profit from the publicity. The sisters claimed they never saw any of the purported millions of dollars made by the government and their parents from this bizarre upbringing. With their privacy severely abused and their childhood traumatized, the Dionne Quints severed ties with the rest of their family and the three surviving sisters currently share a modest house and an intensely private life in Montreal.
Charles Vance Miller had an ordinary birth and never had children of his own but he certainly deserves a spot in a list of bizarre birth stories. By the time of his death in 1926, the Canadian lawyer amassed a large fortune but had no one to leave it to. He was a strange fellow whose puckish attitude was reflected in his will. Among his many oddball bequests was that his Jamaican vacation home be given to three lawyers who absolutely hated each other. When the last lawyer died, the house would be sold and the money given to Toronto’s poor. The will also stated that any unstipulated money was to be given to the mother who gives birth to the highest number of legitimate children within the ten years after his death. The event became known as the Great Stork Derby and by the end of the ten year period, six moms split the fortune: $125,000 each to four women who gave birth to nine children apiece and $12,500 to two women, one of whom had two stillbirths and the other who had children with someone who was not her husband. The prizes may not seem like much now but each was a fortune given the Depression of the early 30s. Happily, all of the families used their money wisely with the children’s education being the top priority.






























Another quality list!
wow the five year old giving birth is impressive, poor kid.
but whats more impressive is the mother who gave birth to the biggest baby
DAMN
Good list
Very good, had heard of a few of these. suprised to see nothing off “I didnt know i was pregnant”. Or the woman who recently gave birth on a flight and dumped the baby in the toilet rubbish bin.
Ah the many wonders of the human body! Superb list!
Author, the pic of the 5 yr old in the nude needs to be removed. Child *****ography laws anyone?
What?? How on earth do you consider that photo to be child *****ography?! Please look up what that term means, because that picture does NOT fit anywhere in there.
@Reason08 (6): true but it looks like the author wants to show authentic if not proof of such existence. just my 2 cents.
I knew all of these lol, but great list anyway!
Faaaaarrk, look at the photo in number nine. I’d be furious at the obvious extra marital shaggery going on there. I mean I’d never hit a woman but I’d put a serious beat down on a dirty old ho.
Try reading what nine says… it’s ten that tells about the woman cheating. I also for the life of me cannot figure out how ten is biologically possible.
@Travis (9): LOL!
@Reason08
I agree with sgcvelasco, there’s nothing *****ographic about the photo. It’s intended educationaly, nothing more.
@Reason08 (6): Yeah. Don’t be, like what we Filipinos say, green-minded or malicious. It’s for educational purposes.
Obviously the people who are shouting child *****ography have never opened a medicine book in their lives. THAT pic is totally educational..
crazy list, somewhat interesting!
@reason08 (6): I agree with you. Education of the nude calibure should be viewed by children in a controlled environment where adults can supervise and give guidance. This is not one of those places. Take the pic off. Laws are laws, even on the net.
Look. ***** ed is essential. But this is a five year old child, people!
@Reason08 (6): the pic needs not to be removed..
However, a warning saying some Pic would be offensive to some people would be a good idea
I’ve seen a program about the little girl from Peru and read up on it. I think there needs to be a little more emphasis on who the father was? Was there ever an investigation? Can genetic testing to be done to see if the father is by incest? These questions have always irked me. Maybe just as mother of a babygirl myself. The poor thing probably had no idea what was happening to her body, having been pregnant twice I can’t imagine going through that whilst still a toddler!! If you can’t tell Im very emotional and I’m okay with that. I love those “I didn’t know i was pregnant” stories. I don’t believe you. Seriously, HOW COULD YOU NOT KNOW? It’s an entire person in your abdomen ffs! Denial or delusion?
BTW, Brutal list, man.
My sister in law gave birth to a baby girl last week, 5 weeks prem. I thought THAT was way too small..
If the woman gave birth on the toilet, and the chute emptied onto the tracks, wouldn’t the baby be dragged along the tracks on the umbelical cord? or did it just snap ? Great list Gabi. One of the best bizarre lists i’ve seen in a while ! All of these cases are incredible !
Not really, no. If the mother happened to pass the “afterbirth” or placenta, the umbilical cord is attached to that, so the baby and placenta would both have been found and the baby would have survived. The one thing that confuses me though, is how the baby would have survived the fall onto the tracks…
Another quality list!!
Sources! where are they?
Reason08, Sonicsuicide and Treblingidiot – please go away and read a cereal box or something. We are all adults here and if that picture only relates to that for you then maybe you should examine your own obvious issues….?
Also Sonicsuicide – if your kids are surfing in an unsupervised capacity then this is the least of their problems – doh!
Bravehistickle – they’ve probably never opened a book of any type
Techstyles (24) – Two words: CHILD *****..
If you’re ok with that on a family website, then you are a sick person and should be put down.
@sonicsuicide (25): This is not child *****, you are exuding total ignorance..where is the ***** in it? In fact, these type of pics appear in the newspaper also..would you ban your family from reading the news?
Sonicsuicide – I see an educational picture of a child used to illustrate a point. YOU see child ***** – that tells me a lot man…
By newspaper, I mean once in a time cases like this(maybe) and not all the time..anyways you don’t expect children going the wrong way after viewing that pic.
@techstyles (27): Yea what I was tryin’ to say..
That is the point! Are you fricking blind?! 5-year-old ***** and pubic hair. THAT’s the *****. What is your definition? I guess this kind of thing turns you on, huh? Laws prevent these types of pics appearing in newspapers for a reason.. Prove me wrong. Show me a link to any mainstream paper that shows a nude of anyone younger than 18. Do that and I will gracefully retract my argument.
Look, if the author won’t remove it, at least blur out the naughty bits and put a warning.
actually I first saw this picture in a magazine called closer a few years ago! Your the idiot and clearly don’t know when you should just be quiet!
BTW. I’m a girl. That is my I am standing up to *****ist neanderthals who say little naked kiddies are educational.
Ok, first off, just cuz it’s showing the *****ual organs does NOT!!!!!!! Mean it’s *****. Wow, really???? How did you feel about ***** ed classes in school? Are you gonna be one of those prudish moms that protests it because you think ***** is shameful? Well, guess what? Everyone has *****. It is perfectly natural! That picture of the 5 year old Lina was taken so people would have a better understanding of how well developed she was at that age. It’s not to try and get old perverts off. Stop looking at research as *****ography and get over your feminist ways. Yes, I am a woman as well. I believe in women having equal rights. But you god damn feminists take ***** way too far! People like you who think every nude picture of a woman is *****ist. Makes me *****ing ashamed of being a woman. Thanks.
@sonicsuicide (25): Youre an Idiot !! Why dont you go google your two words and ***** off !
Sonicsuicide, you’re the one staring at it enough to notice ***** and pubic hair. I saw a big pregnant belly and moved on!
Miss: Great argument points.. Please try to hold back all those long words. I’m battling to keep up with you.
Me: And that’s all you need to see. Which is why all I ask is for gabi to blur a bit. It’s not fricking rocket science. And it won’t detract from the quality of the list at all.
@Me (33): Hahahahaha..good point
@sonicsuicide (34): I figured I’d keep it short and sweet in dealing with a *****ing imbecile like yourself
very interesting list… loved it.
Double you.. Tea.. Eff..
Wow. That was a conversation killer.
I’ll get Dr. Phil on the line for you.
@sonicsuicide: Anatomy is not *****ography. Should we be arresting the mothers who change their children’s nappies on public changing tables? Is that indecent exposure to you? It’s the kind of image you can find in any national geographic, and if you honestly think the image is titillating, you have some serious issues. If you’re still hungry for the taste of being self-righteously offended, try this link out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phan_Th%E1%BB%8B_Kim_Ph%C3%BAc
@sonicsuicide (38): so if you go on vacation and see a kid (female or male) that doesnt wear any underwear you start screaming peadophiles? Plus since when did the depiction of ***** become *****ography?? Plus images like that one can be found in any medical book.
Ps: little cupids (on statues and paintings). Now thats ***** for you right there.
I have nude pictures of both my children (ages 3 and 4 monthes) arrest me now!!
@Arsnl (41): on the beach i mean. Sorry for the double post
@ MinaLumina (41): Haha. Now that’s a good argument. Indecent exposure and child *****ography are two different things though. Indecent exposure encompasses all ages and in most countries just fined. Child ***** is when the victim is aged between 2 and 18. Nappie changing doesn’t qualify. But your link certainly does. *****.. That link is brutal.
(“self-righteously offended” – Love your word usage. Didn’t realize I was coming off in that way.)
I personally didn’t see the picture as ***** I saw it as educational. Also I think one of the reasoning of someone maybe seeing it that way is the insane maturity of a 5 years olds body. 5 year olds do not have breasts or pubic hair, and they don’t usually yet have the ability to get pregnant. I think seeing the mixture of a grown womans naked body on a child is sending mixed signals. For all intents and purposes the photo exists as photographic proof of the pregnancy and if I was told this story without seeing the picture I would defintaly want to see one. Not because I’m a pedophile but because you HAVE to see it to BELIEVE it. Do you know how tiny a 5 year old is? It’s the obsudity of it that makes the picture fascinating. I think there might be some more issues here than just a picture. I mean like obviously someone had a funny uncle.
Awesome list, gabi!
Really enjoyed the last story and the tiny baby story. However, I feel sorry for that baby girl for the oldest parents. They wanted a baby boy only. I heard that they might give up the baby girl once a boy is born. Sad.
As for the pic for the youngest girl…I am a woman and a mother. The pic didn’t bother me.
Easy people. Just old fashioned I guess. Sorry.
You don’t have to apologize for being protective of children. Ever.
http://criminal-law.freeadvice.com/criminal-law/child-*****ography-law.htm
If you folks thing the picture of the 5 year old girl is *****ography, please go to this link. This explains the U.S. law about this subject. As the photo was NOT taken with the intention to elicit a *****ual response in it’s viewer, I don’t think this qualifies. Also I’m sure pediatric sites exist to show child medical cases, if the child is nude is that *****ography? Please ask yourselves these things. Thank you.
MamaBear2Cubs: Thanks for the support.
Logic: Good point.
I retract my argument. However, emotionally I still feel its wrong. And the fact that no-one will change it or even add a warning brings this site down a few notches on my respect scale. And that most people could only answer my convictions will obscene language and name-calling.. Well.. This is the internet!
people wouldn't necessarily call you names and use obscene language if you weren't being so single minded in your argument SS. Many of the comments I have read are from women, as i am myself and they aren't all screaming about child ***** as you are. I, as someone else also said, saw the big pregnant belly and read the story,, that's all. and how is that picture any different from pictures in magazines such as National Geographic, showing all the naked big bellied kids in third world countries? There are thousands of places where you can see pictures of that ilk but it's not considered child ***** because they are starving third world kids? Do you disrespect honorable magazines and articles showing similar pictures for the same thing? really. I think you need to look at your deeper issues before you start ranting about it in here, I'm not trying to downplay the seriousness of Child *****ography at all but in this case i think you are freaking out at the wrong people is all. I do agree that there should be a warning about pictures possibly bothering people but having a fit over it is silly and infantile. The picture is there as proof and for educational purposes, end of story.
great list BTW the tiny little feet gave me shivers, I couldn't even imagine how the parents dealt,,
Child *****ography implies something *****ographic is being shown. What I see is a VERY standard anatomical picture. She’s not touching herself in anyway or posing *****lly, she’s just standing there. Her eyes are blacked out, as well. =/
Some site (Wikipedia, perhaps?) mentioned that her father had been suspected of molesting her, but they couldn’t prove anything. that’s something nobody would want to come out and admit, especially not back in the day when there was no support for victims of things like that.
I believe, for number ten, that it was supposed to be unusual, but it only says usual. if not, than there is a grammar error.
Ah. That’s my problem. As a new mother myself, I suffer paranoid schitzophrenic delusions and see peadeophiles and sharp corners everywhere.
I feel sorry for the mom in #5. Poor woman!
@techstyles (23) by Treblingidiot did you mean me? If so, please read my comment again as I said “the pic needs NOT to be removed.” I merely suggested there be a warning–like in prior lists that contain images that may/may not disturb some people–to prevent those who DO take offense to refrain from protesting. *Note that I said “some” and “those”.
Another suggestion: please take a moment to pay attention to what a person is saying before you tell him/her to “read a cereal box or something,” thank you.
And yes, I agree. What’s ***** and what is not depends on how you see things. A photograph depicting 2 people having ***** can be considered art, as a photographed scene of a little boy swimming jumping to a river can be considered *****. It’s all subjective.
But calling names to people who doesn’t share the same view as yours? There are better ways to argue.
Yay! The cavalry arrives!
Great List Thank you.
As for the conversation about *****, Child *****ography has Typology determined by COPINE SCALE. Type 1 to 3 is not considered *****. This picture falls under the category of “Indicative” which is for family photo or for education purposes.
One can find this article and picture in Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lina_Medina
If still not satisfied with this response try arguing with the wiki administrators, I’m sure they have many legals explanations to satisfy your thought.
I have a feeling I’ve seen this list somewhere before..
the picture of the 5-year-old doesnt come off as *****ographic to me, but you never know if some other “funny uncle” is copying it and pasting it into his personal gallery. i can see the concern.
a small warning (NSFW) would do.
also, some people here seem to think “child *****ography” is ***** for children. lol
Great list. In my opinion, in viewing the above comments, I feel a bit ashamed of being a woman; emotional attachments/ reasoning for every argument contributes greatly to our downfall… Sigh…
no reason to feel ashamed nicole, I think people can get very heated by issues such as Child *****ography,, as we should,, but some go a little overboard every time they see a pic of a little naked kid,, there are many shades of gray, as they say. I don't believe this picture should be considered as such myself but I get the same overheated insanity over me when I see child or animal abuse,, I'm also heavily into animal rights. We all have our causes right?
don't even get me started on Ligers,, had me a big argument on you-tube over it and people not seeing the problem with it,,, GAH!!! yes, i'm done