The ten novels on this list all substantiate the belief that books are the most elastic, introspective, human and entertaining form of media that exist. Not movies, not music, not art, not the theatre. A famous author once said that novels are the best way for two human beings to connect with each other. I believe this, and I believe that people who do not find pleasure in words have never had the opportunity to read one of the great novels. The first introductions students often have to literature are stale century-old books that do not translate well to this new modern era. Frankly they are boring, and a lot of kids drift into the living room and turn on the television and stay glued for the rest of their lives. So, here I will present the ten greatest novels of the last twenty years, without apologies.

First Sentence: ”It is after midnight on one of those Friday nights when the guests have all gone home and the host and hostess are left in their drunkenness to try and put things right again.”
As the only woman on the list, A. M. Homes deserves recognition for her amazing writing skills, her unique voice and her gloomy view of the world. Homes shines when writing about screwed-up, out-of-love or on the brink of out-of-love couples. Torching is no exception. The married couple, Paul and Elaine, first appeared in a short story in The Safety of Objects, and then took on a life of their own. Married in suburbia, with two young boys, we follow them in their search for happiness, or some form of contentment, which they never seem to find. Smoking crack in the dining room, having affairs, trying to burn down their own house…nothing seems to change their boredom and disappointment. They’re stuck. They’ve become strangers to each other, to themselves, to their children.
Homes makes this common enough theme of suburban ennui feel real with her shining prose, a secondary cast of interesting plots and characters, and lack of a fairy-tale ending.

First Sentence: “Tyler gets me a job as a waiter, after that Tyler’s pushing a gun in my mouth and saying, the first step to eternal life is you have to die.”
Of course, Palahniuk had to be on this list. And while he may have written better novels than Fight Club (see Survivor), this is the one that brought him to the show and inspired a new, fed-up generation to push back. I won’t insult you by giving a summary of the plot, but I will say that nobody in the world writes better, sentence to sentence, than Palahniuk. His quick, intelligent prose keeps the attention of the worst ADHD-sufferers, and the themes in Fight Club of revolt, of going back to zero, of anti-consumerism are universal, accessible and desperately needed in the world we live in today.

First Sentence: ”While enthusiasts and detractors will continue to empty entire dictionaries attempting to describe or deride it, “authenticity” still remains the word most likely to stir a debate.”
Words to describe this novel: Dazzling, original, mind-bending, genius, heart-breaking, addicting, wonderful, jaw-dropping. The list goes on and on and on. No other novel has created its own world quite like Leaves. Danielewski made us question our own sanity. He led us through the 3-and-a-half-minute hallway and then left us there, shivering and alone, waiting for the monster, who we’ve only ever felt, but that we know (for certain for certain) is the most terrifying thing in the world.
The main plot follows a family who moves into a new house that they quickly find out is haunted. Sounds simple and cliché right? Imagine if you will a book that you have to take over to your mirror to read passages written backwards. Imagine twenty-two page rants about the origins of the word echo. Imagine endless footnotes dripping with blood and perfectly normal characters slowing getting drawn deeper and deeper into neurosis and insanity until they can’t find their way out, until you can’t tell the characters in the book from the people reading it. Imagine.
The house is alive. It breathes. Don’t go any further. Forget you ever read this. Go on with your life, and move down the list. Do NOT read this book. You’ve been warned.

Dubus is considered by many the greatest short story writer of the 20th century, and there is fairness in this claim. This book consists of three novellas, woven together and taken from earlier Dubus publications. It is also a wonderful movie starring the enigmatic Laura Dern and Naomi Watts. It’s about two middle-aged couples who can’t seem to keep their pants on. Affairs are had, feelings crushed, epiphanies thwarted, friendships tested.
But what makes this one of the great books is the “realness” it elicits from the reader. It puts the reader in every character’s mind, and it puts us right there in the bedroom, in the woods, or on the back porch. Not only does “We Don’t Live Here” entertain us, it gives us a rubric of how to live our own lives. Shows us that nobody ever has anything figured out, not really. That what we do and feel morphs and shifts. Shows us what to do when everything we’ve held on to for so long goes away, how to bear it. It’s about desperation, and love, and marriage. It’s about paralyzing loneliness, kids, and housewives, and betrayal. Ultimately it’s about what it’s like to live in a world where we get to make all the decisions, and have to bear the repercussions of what those decisions mean. It does what a great book is supposed to do: it makes us feel.

First Sentence: “When he woke in the woods in the dark and cold of the night he’d reach out to touch the child sleeping beside him.”
Cormac McCarthy is one of the greatest novelists still alive today (a phantasm of Faulker), and his newest book, The Road, clearly exemplifies this claim. It’s full of McCarthy’s terse dialogue, minute detail (but not TOO much, like Blood Meridian) stream-of-consciousness, masculinity, and an excruciatingly intense violent plot (win!). Not to mention that, in addition to all of these things, it’s also overwhelmingly sad, which is not an easy thing for a novel to be. It’s the perfect combination of everything, with exact measurements dolled out like a recipe for brownies.
It’s about a father and a son walking south to Mexico, to find warmth in a post-apocalyptic world, whose journey is beset on all sides by cannibals, and hunger, and the freezing cold. The sun is gone behind clouds of black dust, and the only light comes from the father’s love of his son. Without each other, all will be lost. This book is heart-wrenching, desperate and mesmerizing. The intensity of their journey, of the book itself, is indescribable, so I won’t even try. Let me just say that I was literally in tears in the middle of a crowded Barnes and Nobles, trying to pretend like there was something in my eyes. You will not be able to breathe until you finish it. It’s a fast read, because you have to see have to see have to see what happens next.

First Sentence: “And it’s a story that might bore you, but you don’t have to listen, she told me, because she always knew it was going to be like that, and it was, she thinks, her first year, or actually weekend, really a Friday, in September, and Camden, and this was three or four years ago, and she got so drunk that she ended up in bed, lost her virginity (late, she was eighteen) in Lorna Slavin’s room, because she was a Freshman and had a roommate and Lorna was, she remembers, a Senior or a Junior and usually sometimes at her boyfriend’s place off-campus, to who she thought was a Sophomore Ceramics major but who was actually either some guy from N.Y.U., a film student, and up in New Hampshire just for The Dressed To Get Screwed party, or a townie.”
This is the second novel from Ellis, of American Psycho fame. It doesn’t depart much from the style (run-on sentences, sex, drugs, 80’s MTV music videos, more drugs, more sex, some violence thrown in there) of his other works, except that here it works throughout the whole book. Here he gives us a little more to work with, like allusions (Howard Roark!), different narrators, a setting that’s not L.A, and a semi-coherent plot. His talent is endless and the sentences run on seamlessly until you’re almost disappointed when a sentence actually ends. Nobody in the world can write like Ellis, though many have tried, and failed miserably. Yes, Ellis is a deranged person (has to be), but he’s also a prolific, talented writer whose put his time in. And here he shines.
It’s about sex and drugs and horrible, self-absorbed, incomplete people, trying to get laid and quit smoking in a fictional University in New England. The things they do are despicable and immoral. There’s nothing redeeming about any of the characters in the entire book, no hope, and yet this book stings because nobody could write this well about people like this if they did not, in fact, exist in real life. When’s the last time you went to college? What do you think happens in Universities around America? What do you think most people are really like? This is a documentary of lost, attractive young people falling into the void. And nobody cares and nobody cares and nobody cares.

First Sentence: “Sometimes when people asked Eileen Holland if she had any brothers or sisters, she had to think for a moment.”
Another second novel. As always Franzen’s scope is immense, and his talent is clear on every page. If Palanuick is the very best writer, sentence to sentence, then Franzen is clearly the best living novelist. This story involves one Louis Holland, and a Harvard seismologist named Dr. Reneé Seitchek, and it revolves around abortion activists, big corporations, and strange sudden earthquakes appearing near Boston, which every Harvard seismologist knows is very strange indeed. It writes about the evil of corporations, but in a stronger, more mature way than Palanuick. Franzen is a historian, and he tells us exactly why the world is bad, how it came to be that way. He goes all the way back to the colonization of America, but not in a preachy or boring way. He personifies a raccoon for five pages, which is strangely one of the most poignant parts of the whole book.
The two main characters are what make the book. The medium-attractive Renee’ Seitchek and the lonely, lost Louis Holland, who fall for each other but seemingly never at the same time, and have painful rubbing sex as the earth shakes underneath them.
Franzen is a master and a genius; he builds and constructs. He creates suspense, and makes us wait for whatever’s going to happen. He makes us work for it. As with the #1 author on this list, you can imagine him standing behind a door somewhere laughing at all of his readers. He’s smarter than us, and God can the man write. This novel succeeds where The Twenty-seventh City fell a little short, and The Corrections overthrew.

First Sentence: “They say it came first from Africa, carried in the screams of the enslaved; that it was the death bane of the Tainos, uttered just as one world perished and another began; that it was a demon drawn into Creation through the nightmare door that was cracked open in the Antilles.”
This book reverberates with originality, authenticity and craftsmanship. It follows generations of a Dominican-American family, the struggles they encounter in the Dominican Republic, and the curses that follow them to America. The main protagonist Oscar is a 300-pound nerdy, RPG-playing guy in America, who desperately wants to find love. We follow him in his constant struggle to find it, and bear witness to his countless rejections. No girl wants anything to do with this sweaty, obese nerd, and at some point our pity turns to admiration, as we root for him to succeed, screaming “You can do it Oscar. You can do it!”
Now go back a few decades to when his mother was the hottest thing in all of Dominica, and broke guy’s hearts by just batting an eyelash. Who eventually falls for a gangster (Why Beli, why?) involved with the Trujillo (evil dictator) regime that raped and murdered and tortured like it was going out of style. Then go back a little more to her father (Oscar’s grandfather) and see what happens to a respected surgeon who’s looked away from all the raping and torturing going on in his country until Trujillo himself sets his eyes on his beautiful daughter. Then you might just believe that there really are “fuku’s” (horrible unbreakable curses) and that this family’s got a BAD one.
Diaz blends Dominican history and folklore, humor, love, sex, death, revolutions, Castro, and dictators into one of the best freshman novels of all time. He employs current pop references, historical footnotes, a bad-ass original refreshing writing style, a mysterious narrator, Spanish, a blazing humor, age-old plot devices, and one of the most heart-breaking characters in existence to make this an instant classic.

First Sentence: “Last night at 3:00 A.M. President Kennedy had been killed.”
This mammoth odyssey about the Vietnam War transcends all other attempts to write about Vietnam, and makes them look like Hallmark greeting cards. It follows Skip Sands, working for the psychological operations department of the CIA, and his larger than life uncle “Colonel Sands”. It takes us everywhere in Southeast Asia, and even back to the United States. Johnson depicts a war where nothing is clear, where friends and enemies are indistinguishable, and where myths are created out of the land itself.
With a cast of half-a-dozen supporting characters, he portrays the war from the perspective of both sides of Vietnam, from two G.I. brothers from Arizona (who appeared in Johnson’s Angels), from a widowed Canadian nurse who can’t stop reading Calvin, from a Sergeant who seems to be perpetually tripping on acid, from a German hit-man, from a priest in the Philippines who thinks he’s Judas, from a “civilian” war-hero Colonel who’s trying to implement his own unorthodox campaign against the Vietcong.
Spanning thirty years, and over 700 pages, it’s still a disappointment when you arrive at the last page. This is Johnson’s masterpiece – a book you can imagine him writing under a succubus’s spell in a fallout shelter—hair long, unshaven, chain-smoking, frenzied to get the words out.

First Sentence: “I am seated in an office surrounded by heads and bodies.”
So here we are. While it was very difficult indeed to rank the other nine books on this list, deciding where to put this book on the list was as involuntary as breathing. This is by far the best, the longest, the most difficult, the most frustrating, the most entertaining, the most rewarding book on this list.
The term Infinite Jest is an allusion to Hamlet, as well as the title of a film by auteur Jim Incandenza, that circulates throughout the book causing anyone who’s unlucky enough to watch it, to want to do absolutely nothing else but watch it again and again and again, even if that means starving to death, or going to the bathroom on themselves, or not taking their insulin and going into epileptic shock. Ultimately, this book is about addiction in every form you could possibly imagine: Heroin, alcohol, cannabis, crack, cocaine, Diludiad, Percocet, sex, sports, cleaning, and on and on and on.
With a cast of hundreds, and almost 400 footnotes, coming in at a whopping 3 lbs, Jest focuses mainly on a halfway house in the Boston suburbs, and the adjacent Enfield Tennis Academy. Wallace spent hundreds of hours going to AA meetings, and this book is considered by many to be the most realistic account of drug addiction and the Alcoholics Anonymous program in either fiction or non-fiction.
Wallace created his own world in Infinite Jest. This is not just a big novel with big ideas. It’s not just a grand achievement by a writer with the greatest voice of his generation. This is not something you finish and then say, “Well that was a really great book,” and then move on with your life. This book deserves its own cannon. It cannot be categorized. This book genuinely redefines the boundaries of what a novel can do.
Wallace hung himself in late 2008. Infinite Jest is his second, and last, finished novel.












?
yay new books on my to read list
These books all sound really good, especially House of Leaves. I need to start reading novels again.
No Harry Potter, seriously? …I kid, I kid (just be happy I didn't say Twilight instead).
If the list was about most influential novels in the last 20 years, Harry Potter would probably rank in the top five.
True, but I believe if this list was expanded to 25 or 30 items, HP would be somewhere in the twenties. Also Trainspotting would be no.11, because it should be on this list but was excluded for some reason I can’t fathom.
Yeah, where the hell is TWILIGHT?!!!!! it rulez!!!!
The fact that you can't spell the word "rules" is a reason in itself for not having Twilight on this list.
I agree with Harry Potter being on a "20 most influential novels" list.
Sarcasm, look it up.
Twilight is actually pretty influential – a story that teaches young girls all the wrong lessons and has created a generation of 20-somethings who have no respect whatsoever for teenagers. There are very few books that can make me instantly dismiss somebody just for their reading tastes.
'House of Leaves' is STUNNING
I couldn’t even get past the first chapter of Harry Potter. Many people like it, but I guess I’m one of the lucky few who doesn’t get sucked in to inane fads. I’m quite tired of hearing about both Harry Potter and Twilight. Both of them have gone on for far too long and the fans of each are obsessive and senseless.
Obsessive and senseless? That’s a serious accusation. I love Harry Potter, but I’m not obsessed with it. It is a great story and a wonderful contribution to children’s literature. It’s fine that you couldn’t get past the first chapter (I know plenty of people who couldn’t), but you shouldn’t hate it just because you didn’t get it. Harry Potter has only been popular for about 15 years, which is way less time than other books. I agree that some fans can get obsessive, but they aren’t hurting anyone. At least they’re reading and not watching *****ty tv shows.
As for Twilight, yes it isn’t well written and is horribly contradicting, but it is mildly entertaining. Everyone thinks it, we just don’t like to admit it because we’re too proud.
It makes me sad to know that a lit major, who probably got to read so many amazing books, could write something like Twilight
I can understand why that may seem upsetting. Still, Meyer – who was a stay at home mom – hadn’t written a word (by her own admission) in the years after graduating from Brigham Young. She had a dream, transcribed it, and within six months had a publishing contract with Little, Brown. While it’s easy to deride her and the quality of the work, the fact is that she is more successful than most writers could ever hope to be. Most people who graduate with literature or English degrees go on to careers that have little to do with their education. Perhaps the thing to really wonder about is why Western culture “needed” Twilight so badly. Paranormal (vampire) romance is not a new thing. It’s not new in terms of young adult fiction. Why did Twilight become a pop culture phenomenon?
Is it because culturally “we’re” looking to get back to traditional gender roles and behaviors? Is it because we want to reaffirm that consumerism and the destruction of nature is the correct path to continue along? The questions are endless. Or maybe it has something to do with the fact that readers become invested in the general dramatism of the text (see Kenneth Burke). Meyer, in my opinion, is an expert at drawing out the dramatistic tensions that provide readers ample suspense, making the satisfaction (when the main characters finally resolve the conflict of the moment) enjoyable.
What Meyer has created is not new by any means. These are the rules that govern all “literature.” However, she’s managed to surpass many people who toil away day after day wishing to become “real authors.” That’s a sizable achievement.
You’ll also notice, there are no women on this list…
chuck paluinik (whatever) as the best writer ever? I think not. Try Updike, for one.
CRUICO
Needed to teach her a lesson.
hehe.. well at sum point i agree wit u.. me 2 din got stuck wit HP series.. bt whn it cums to Twilight.. m jus in luv wit it.. bt had rumors tht 1st prt of Breaking Dawn couldn’t attrct many.. lets c..
don’t bother with house of leaves, unless you need upside down paragraphs forced avant-garde structure to make you enjoy a story. printed normally, this would have been a relatively enjoyable and interesting book, but they just tried too hard. i ended up skipping most of the crap that was written all sideways. it’s incredibly annoying.
Wow, other than 'The Road', I knew none of these. And best novels? I hope they're not boring..I'd rather read the illustrated classics than 'the best novels' which turn out to be just philosophical and preachy *****..will have to check 'em myself heh
You havent heard of fight club? I dont know if the book is anything like the movie but still.
Maybe people just aren't talking about it.
That's the rule
I see what you did there….
Only the movie. It's like I know that 'No Country for Old Men' is a book, but since the movie was so awesome I didn't feel the need to read it.
I read it and didn't really like it. Then again, I didn't really like 1984 either, so maybe I just have weird tastes.
(I absolutely love Arthur Conan Doyle, though. Maybe I just don't like stories that don't have a nice, neat conclusion)
Or you like stories with a strong, reliable structure, characters that are the same from novel to novel and where the main character will not be tortured by rats.
This is one of those rare instances when the movie is better than the book. The book is still worth reading. I'd try to keep any preconceived notions from the movie out of mind while reading it if you want to get the most out of it.
You've never heard about "Fight Club"? Wow, people have been observing rules 1 and 2 better than I thought.
Great list, had only heard of #1 and The Road, which I believe was featured on another Listverse list, and #1 I see only on visits to a certain office…
Damn good list – I wish I had already read them all.
interesting list. not because it doesn't lack any intellectual argument from the author of the list. Not in the least. All these books (i have read none of them), seem to have substance.
I would have thought , however, that the list would have contained some of the more popular novels of the last twenty years that have inspired/encouraged people to read a book instead of watching the movie adaptation.
Some that come to mind are the Harry Potter series that encouraged millions of kids to pick up and read a book. Or another example, the Twilight series of books (please don't give me a thumbs down for this one, i am only pointing out the fact that millions of teenage girls read these books, not that i endorse them…)
To understand what i mean, I read The Da VInci Code and found it very entertaining. The movie, released much later, was a very bad adaptation and did not do the book any justice. I got so impressed with Dan Brown's writting style that i went out and bought the rest of his books and enjoyed them too.
Anyhow, thats my humble opinion, now its on to Ebay to chase down some of the books in the list!
Your argument would be valid if this was the top 10 most influential novels of the last 20 years. Rowling and Brown are both great authors and deserve praise but I don't think they really fit this list.
Also, the book almost always trumps the movie. It's probably because the author takes advantage of the reader's imagination and also has a lot more room to fully shape his vision while the movie has about 2 hours.
thanks, spiderbait , for an intelligent and constructive comment. Clearly though, others didn't interpret what i had to say correctly, hence i get negatives….
I dunno, I felt LOTR was better as a movie. Maybe because I never fell asleep while watching, whereas I've fallen asleep lots of times trying to get through Fellowship of the Rings.
I agree about books being better than movies though. My pet peeve at the moment is how awfully they've adapted Rowling's subtle hints throughout the series into the movie version, which makes me curious as to how they're going to make movie 7. A lot of those subtleties are necessary to keep the story cohesive, and randomly revealing them to the audience reeks of deus ex machina.
As far as real literature goes, Harry Potter – and Twilight especially – aren't that great. Maybe the later Harry Potter ones (you can see her growth as an author throughout the series. I've always thought that was really interesting), but really there are much greater books out there. I haven't read any on this list, but I've read plenty better than the Harry Potter series.
But Meyer can't write. She doesn't have it.
Brown isn't that great as far as authors go either, but he was redeemed by an absolutely fascinating story.
Anyway, this list of books is much better than anything containing a bunch of 'pop' books everyone's already read.
Pi by Yann Martel.
The Secret History by Donna Tartt.
These two novels are among the best, I have read. Better than the Rules of Attraction and Fight Club.
Definitely Life Of Pi…is one of the best novels I've read in a while….
Pi was the first novel that came to mind when I saw this list
Also Push by Sapphire, it was the book that inspired the movie Precious. Of course, it's hard to narrow it down to 10.
Both of Tartt's novels are better than anything Ellis every dreamed of.
Ever. Ever. Yes, I see it.
great list! i was expecting popular things like potter(which in comparison to the books listed, are not very good), but i was pleasantly surprised.
Not very good in what way? Does the measure of a good book have to be the acceptance of academia or critics. I would have to say that a good book is any book that makes a person turn off the tv and use some of their own imagination. However, I have to put The Road as my number one choice. It is hands down one of the best books I have ever read.
Hmmm… Infinite Jest is #1… Really?
You read the description. The author killed himself. That means his work is automatically rated at 250% of its actual value.
Haha, I like Infinite Jest, but as a literary critic-in-training, this comment made me laugh.
nice one, dumbass…
just try to read it… it definitly deserves its position on this list.
wallace was a genius.
his writing outranges everything you ever read before – or it just overstrains you after half of the first page.
"or it just overstrains you "
You mean like ULYSSES? Between the two IJ is so much easier to read. I think it would be hilarious to put a standard on how easy something is to read by rating what you have normally been exposed to. IJ would be rated easy if you have read ULYSSES but if the most difficult thing you read is HARRY POTTER then you might be in trouble with this book.
I suspect that had this list been compiled while DFW was living it would still be at the top of the list.
Among novels, there have been a lots of 'favorites' and 'less favorites' and 'intact, back to the library'. A Great List. IPRESNEL has provided me with the list of novels to finish by the end 2010.
I would like to add some of my favorites…
1. Possession: A Romance by A. S. Byatt (i actually read it aloud to savor it)
2. Corelli's Mandolin by Louis De Bernieres (Beautiful, except the ***** end)
3. Trainspotting by Irvine Welsh (OMG, OMG, better than the movie)
4. A Suitable Boy by Vikram Seth (a really fat book, not just to kill the wasps)
5. The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro (tough but good read)
There are about 10 more additions to point out but i dont want to give u a stupid listverse list.
Disclaimer: These are my favourites. i dont expect all to accept these as the best. These are my favorite novels… I like these, i wrote about these. If u dont like these, then dont reply…
Well i wont lie here. Ive seen the movie versions of trainspottin and the remains of the day and they were great.
If you say that trainspottin is better than the movie you made me very curious.
Well, go an and read it. It a very different style of writing. The novel gives us more than the movie.
Movie was MIND-BLOWING, but the novel is absolutely MIND-BLASTING.
Go Read it…
I love the way Trainspotting is written the way it is spoken. Hard to wrap the internal voice around those syllables and I had no idea what ken meant until i had read half a chapter. Was surprised not to see it listed above.
Possession is a beautiful read, one of my all-time faves, and one that I have promoted to many a friend. I also enjoyed the novel Trainspotting more than the film… and the film was very, very good.
AAAH!!! I LOVE The Remains of the Day!!!!!! You should read The Book Thief!
Ha Ha… Why do u show ur IQ here???
Haven't you read 'Silence is Golden'? Oops… Of Course, u don't read…
I actually don't like 'best of'-lists because they only show the
opinion of the author. And opinions mostly differ as much as
good and evil.
Nevertheless, this was an suprisingly interesting read and if
I got ever the time again (and remember it), I will probably read
some of the books mentioned.
Thanks!
I totally agree that these types of lists are opinion pieces, and therefore completely subjective. I would have preferred a title like, "Ten Interesting Reads" or "My Top Ten Books Of The Past Twenty Years," or something to that effect. "Best," and "Top Ten" are assumptive and ignorant due to the sheer amount of books published in the last twenty years. I highly doubt the author of this list has read them all.
I agree with both of your comments; I also feel like the author’s voice actually took away from the article for me. I couldn’t actually complete the list, even though I was interested in the books, because the author’s tone was so pompous and self-assured, making such sweeping statements (eg. “I will say that nobody in the world writes better, sentence to sentence, than Palahniuk”) that after the first 4 entries I scrolled straight past their commentary and just took note of the titles. I actually felt disappointed, because usually when I read these lists I love to know what the author thinks; unfortunately I just had a clash with this one.
The title is an allusion to Hamlet? That's the case for #1? Wow.
Well yeah, if you choose to ignore everything else in the entry.
ipresnal; I so love this comment,"He led us through the 3-and-a-half-minute hallway and then left us there, shivering and alone, waiting for the monster, who we’ve only ever felt, but that we know (for certain for certain) is the most terrifying thing in the world. "
This is how cults are born, well said…among other Jungian theories and such…people please correct me if I'm wrong about the theorist…my psych classes are like 20 years gone and I haven't really kept up with the latest and-quite frankly-haven't thought about it forever. You still there Little Boots? You always have such refreshing comments
Hey curtshmurt! I read and stopped to reread that sentence as it reminded me of a poem I had written in my teenage years. I would really like to peruse some of these books, if only for their writing style as I have started to write my own book and I sound like Daniel Dafoe, perhaps since I started writing right after I had read Robinson crusoe. Thank you for your compliment about refreshing comments however. You inspired me to log on and comment for the first time since I went mobile. Well, that and I don't see Randall on here anymore lol hope that wasn't saying too much!
what? Im sure you know that Listverse has always been an English language website, so it figures that most of the lists will be primarily 'Western' in their content. also, does it really matter? i mean, you could buy any of these Novels translated into whatever language you want.
I love to read. My house is full of books. My TV is for video games. I haven't watched any shows for almost a year now. I rent the occasional movie, but prefer reading. In fact, my family are avid readers and my sister ran a used book store. However, while I have heard of most of the titles on this list, I have great pains reading anything that sounds like real life.
It's the first thing that will turn my attention off (and anything romance) and sets it to wonder. Give me fantasy, sci-fi, horror, thriller…and you got my attention. If I want real life, I will open my door and look out.
Out of those above, House of Leaves sounds like one I would read. The Road….maybe. The rest didn't interest me at all….however…..I will recommend these to my family since I'm the only odd ball who likes the non-real stuff. These would be very interesting to them.
Thanks for the list.
"Give me fantasy, sci-fi, horror, thriller…and you got my attention"
Great taste in reading you have! I look for the same stuff…and comics and graphic novels also
I love graphic novels! My old library had quite an excellent collection and I read so many. But Ive since moved and the new library sadly doesnt have a good selection. I too love horror and thrillers. Fantasy, not so much.
Great list, but I'd add The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time.
no ways that was boring . like mentally handicapped Adrien mole .
Oh no you didn't. It was a great book.
I would have also added Sleeping Dogs or Princes, both by Sonya Hartnett.
what no battle royale ?
I was thinking the same thing! That book rocked! You know it's good if it has approximately 40 characters whose names are all very difficult to differentiate, it's 600+ pages long and you can't put it down.
i iz like readin
Good. You can haz cheezeburgurz now.
I have epilepsy and how can not taking insulin put you into a fit? If you don`t take your sabil or lamictal sure but insulin?
Blood sugar irregularities can cause people to have seizures, even if they don't have epilepsy or a history of seizures.
A diabetic seizure is NOT the same as an epileptic one.
Great list though, have read a couple of the books, and a couple different ones of the same authors.
Interesting list. Of these I'd most like to read 'House of Leaves' – your write-up has intrigued me.
On that bombshell, I shall leave you to rebuild your shattered lives.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Heartbreaking_Work…. I am sorry but this at least should be an honorable mention. Great book that has not made the liseverse top tens. Read it and you will find out its true value. Eggers is a fantastic writer……one of the best in the last 20 years in my opinion!
Definitely be in the top #20. Interesting fact: Eggers wrote the intro to the new version of Infinite Jest.
Great timing on the list! A friend and I spoke earlier of needing some novels. I just procured 'Trainspottng' and have begun that, but I always want that next one!
The Road is amazing. The rest are…okay (House of Leaves) to unbearably pretentious (Rules of Attraction). Somewhat overrated zeitgeist kind of books in my opinion, which is all this list is…one person's opinion. This list would rate much higher at Literature 101 mixer than with most actual readers.
The Road though…that was an amazing read. Unlike anything I've ever read. It's a disservice to the great McCarthy to include him on the same list with a naval-gazing poseur like Easton.
I'll never get the comments like, "which is all this list is…one person's opinion." Of course, what else would it be?
List title says they're the best, That sort of implies an objective estimation. I have no objection to the listmaker stating his opinion, but if that's ALL he's going by he should make the title read "Ten Books I Liked the Most" or something like that.
Trainspotting would definitely be # 11.
I dont know. Im happy it stays in its universe (the english speaking world) and doesnt pretend it's for everybody. Unlike science or visual artforms, literature is strictly a cultural thing. The dutch have their books, the germans their masterpieces the french etc etc. So you could never write a top ten universal list about books.
Ps: dont you start again that bs that goes a bit like this: i am the warrior, i say whats on everybody's mind etc etc etc. You are just trolling.
I've never pretended to say what's on everybody's mind. I just say what's on my mind.
You're right with the whole 'every language/country/region has it's own classics. But the title doesn't reflect that. It simply states '10 best novels'. And especially since a lot of foreigners come to this site, some of which already having complained about an American/Anglophonic bias, I wonder why the creator of this list or JFrater doesn't take the hint and tries to think the title through a bit more. It would mean a world of difference, especially since titles/lists like these only seem to confirm the 'US is ignorant of the rest of the world' stereotype.
Man you are being too choosy… see, most people expect to see English novels only on such a list. English is undeniably the only true global language today, I don't expect novels written in e.g. Cyrillic, evoking any interest.
Not a fan of Tolstoy or Dostoyevsky then?
I'v read both- English translations
That comment is Greek to me.
I dont see the point in replying to a trollish comment with an annoying one.
First of all cyrillic is an alphabet not a language. Secondly, what does "only true global language" mean? I speak french so i can talk to europeans, africans, south americans, north americans, asians. Is that not global enough for you? I imagine armin was reffering to books written by english-speaking authors, not the explicit language of the book (that would have made no sense whatsoever), so your comment becomes quite offending. Other people dont count. Hmm feeling c*cky today?
Ummmm..mmmm..oh was it meant to be that…I dunno, he said change it to "10 Best English Novels", so I presumed he wanted novels written in other languages to be included. Like in Russian, French, German, Arabic etc. Anyways..whatever that might be…
And by 'only true global language' I meant that it is the most popular language of communication today worldwide.
First, all languages are "of communication".
Second, Chinese (mandarin) is actually the most popular language.
Thank you.
I was expecting the majority of the books to be from English speaking countries, but I certainly wasn't expecting all the authors to be American. I don't have anything against US literature, I actually have read and liked most of these books, I just think it would have been more precise to explicit that it was an US list only.
The Internet and Listverse is not an American-only universe. There are people from all over the world and speaking a lot of languages. I come here because I like to learn new stuff and this being an international site, the "dumb American" attitude is less common. I don't care if a list is "too American" as long as I learn something, and if I don't, I simply don't read it. But I don't like when a list is supposed to be universal and it just happen to be just American.
And by the way, the world's actual lingua franca is not English, it's Bad English.
@Armin – 'foreigners' – sorry – just made me laugh.
Yes the LV does attract a huge international readership. But as the usual candidates might point out: A) The list title is vague on purpose [re: semiotics(*)], B) The author is an Enlish speaker and is therefore generally limited to referencing English works, and C) If anybody wants to write a French version or a Finnish version, or an 'International' version or whatever, they are very welcome to send in their own list.
(*) – The words 'best', and 'top' are semiotic in that they refer to something in a wider context, but actually mean nothing in themselves. e.g. 'We're Number 1!' – alludes to something, but really could mean anything. Does 'top' mean 'toppest'?, or 'best' bestest? – does 'final' mean the last one ever, or the very latest and the greatest ever ever ever, or the competitor who came last? Nah, it's just marketing code.
No offence meant towards your own views of course.
You won't believe this, but Finnegans Wake actually HAS been translated. Into the Finnish language by the poet Miikka Mutanen… who has got to be mad to have done that LOL
But here it is: http://fwsuomi.freehostia.com/
Hint: click the bottom of the page where it says "Käännös ja alkuteksti", and you'll get Joyce's original version side by side with the translation.
Do you realise the amount of nitpicking you made has reached mother-in-law levels?
And no, the list title doesnt confirm the us is ignorant stereotype. It confirms the "rest of the world cant stop biatchin' about insignificant things". And im part of the rest of the world. Man up.
What is the point of complaining about Americans not being overly multicultural from an international perspective? I think it's human nature for the USA. We have hundreds of cultures here to begin with, we don't live geographically next to other intellectual countries (except Canada, but they speak English for the most part), and we recognize that all people are born with the right to express themselves (we fight repressive regimes for it all the time), so our works crowd out those of foreigners, for better or wise, probably worse.
Anyway, the main point is that when part of your culture is to express yourself freely, you have to go very far to hear another language, and your culture isn't centrally controlled, you have most of what you need already and you have to strive to immerse yourself in a foreign culture. Their distant, speak different languages, have an entirely separate worldview, and perhaps most importantly, they are more than happy to talk in English.
In the end, we just don't get out much. The rose of liberty has it's thorns too. Nothing is perfect and divine.
Maybe my phone version of intense debate is off, but you seem to reply to me. If you are not, then avoid the following.
When did i say that the us is not multi cultural?
Why do you assume its terribly difficult for you to immerse yourself in another culture, while for us its so easy to hop around in the anglo saxon system. Why do you assume we are ever so happy to speak english? Do you think english is a gift from god so its so easy to learn it? No man. We speak english mostly cuz the french got isolated and the brits stepped in, and before that it was spanish and so on and so forth. Its just a status quo. Maybe in 50 years it will be very important to speak chinese.
And i really dont understand your comment about centralized culture? We're not north korea
And whats the deal with the rose of liberty, freedom speach etc etc.
Dude, here we are intelligent humans. You can leave the bs at the door. We have freedom in europe asia africa too. 30% of your text revolves around freedom and i dont get why. Its not at all related to what we were talking about. Hell you might've well talked about bacon.
I feel like there have been much better works from both McCarthy and Palahniuk. "Blood Meridian" is, by far, the best book from McCarthy, and I would probably argue in favor of "Choke" for Palahniuk, although honestly, many of his books were better than "Fight Club" (good though it was). And there hasn't been a piece of modern literature more overrated than "House of Leaves". "Twilight" is more worthy of it's popularity than "House of Leaves". Also, I am surprised at the lack of Jonathan Safran Foer. He wouldn't be in my top ten, but I feel like he fits the theme of this list. I won't argue at all with "Infinite Jest" being number one, though. That's a perfect pick.
The only author I would have insisted was on the list who isn't is Haruki Murakami.
No – the contest winner will be the first list on the newly designed site
I don't understand why you got negative thumbs?
Well, heres a big ol' thumbs up to you Jamie!
Is the newly designed site launching this week?
don't take this as absolution, but projecting mathematically, this was around the right time for it. of course, i vagely remember jafe saying it was getting pushed back a little, which is why the list contest ended 3 days after it was originally supposed to.
Thanks!
I see someone beat me to it with suggesting Life of Pi. I would also recommend "Middle*****" by Jeffrey Eugenidies.
Well…we have the same taste…Life of Pi and Middle***** was my two of my favorites….
I'd say you're forgetting 3 great books: Middle***** by Jeffrey Euginedes, The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay by Micheal Chabon and Special Topics in Calamity Physics by Marisha Pessl.
Just finished reading "…Kavalier and Clay". Utterly brilliant.
I found The Road to be a disappointment- dull, plodding, illogical, over-rated. Perhaps I was comparing it to other, far superior apocalyptic works of literature, and so was unable to appreciate the greatness that so many others ascribe to this book.
I'm really interested in apocalyptic novels, but it's not as common as, say, romance or fantasy etc etc, so I can't really find any by randomly browsing through the library. Can you recommend any?
What are some other apocalyptic books you read? I love this genre and want some good titles.
If you would like to read other dystopian/ post-apocalyptic novels, I bookmarked this list the other day.
If you read through the comments there are other titles mentioned as well. Enjoy.
http://www.popcrunch.com/the-16-best-dystopian-bo…
Not to criticize but its not an apocalyptic story – thats the back drop. Its a story about the relationship between father and son.
I have not read all the novels in the list – thanks for the suggestions – but The Butcher Boy by Patrick McCabe should be definitely included in every single top ten list of best novels of de last 20 years.
Well I think that The Kite Runner should've been here for the sheer emotional impact it had (& maybe A Thousand Splendid Suns too) Others books could've been The White Tiger, The Da Vinci Code or The Lost Symbol. The Bourne trilogy & The Aquaitaine Progression were good too. Come to think of it even The Timeline by Crichton was good & so was The Andromeda Strain & … How isn't a single book by Paulo Coelho included, or James Patterson or one that I've read recently, Karin Slaughter ? Another possible book was False Witness by Dexter Dias (new author but one of the heaviest & most complicated plots I've ever read). Also, no book by Thomas Harris has been included which makes me kinda sad ( SOTL was 1989, but still … Hannibal & Hannibal rising ).
Good list nonetheless …
'The Da Vinci Code' and its related books are NOT deserving in ANY way of top ten lists. Nothing but poorly researched mythology and blatant plot holes. It's as if Brown just took a bunch of places he had read about in high school and connected them to organizations that don't exist anymore/never existed at all. Truly a terrible book that deserves none of the hype.
Real historical thrillers of that sort should have at least SOME facts. Things hat the reader can hold on to; that make him think that maybe this *is* true, even when they know otherwise. 'Da Vinci Code' does none of this—just an utter disregard for logic.
Also, Dan Brown copied the writing style of Sydney Sheldon. Totally same to same. Let me be frank, initially on the first reading I thought the Da Vinci Code was a decent enough thriller. But after reading all of his works, particularly Deception Point and Digital Fortress, I thought WTF, this guy follows the same plot in all his novels- some weird code to crack, all the running here and there and a secret so incredible and damning that revealing it would change the course of the entire world…wow
And it all ends like yaaawwwn…BS. I didn't touch 'The Lost Symbol'.
I'm sick of people trashing Dan Brown because he's not a perfect writer. No one is perfect and there are other books written just as sloppily that are now classics. The only reason people like to pick on Brown is because his books are so popular that they won't feel like the smartest person in the room if don't have a contrary opinion. These are the same type of people who think Forest Gump is a terrible movie, they just want to prove that they're nonconformists who don't like what everyone else likes.
Actually no, some people just have higher standards than you. Dan Brown is a lousy writer, and the most enjoyable thing about his novels for many people is the unintentionally hilarious sentences he occasionally comes up with.
Please mention one "classic" which is written sloppily, I can´t wait to know which authors you consider classic.
Have you ever heard of terms such as bidimensional characters, common places, pretentiousness? Because all that applies to Dan Brown´s lousy work, I had the courage to read the whole Angels and Demons, I only endured it because I needed to know if it wasn´t a truly sophisticated joke, it wasn´t.
That´s how bad it was, regardless of how many books he sells he is bad, very bad, believe me.
Rhe original Bourne books are all older than 20 years, while the andromeda Strain is closer to 40 years old.
Cheers
Lee
Crichton is great, but I believe many of his works fall outside the 20-year time span allotted here.
I won't even start on Dan Brown. Effing lousy, I use my copy of Da Vinci Code as a door stop.
What about Finnegans Wake?? One of the weirdest novels ever written. It took James Joyce 17 years to write it. I dare anyone to try and read it & figure out what it means.
I don't think it fits the time frame, though. It was published in 1939.
Oh ***** your right. My bad.
Finnegans Wake. The most unchecked out book in the library.
You have to let Finnegan’s Wake read you. It’s not for everyone, but those who find their way into it never want to leave. My copy is thick with marginalia. I’ve read it three times through, and my favorite sections many times. (The Anna Livia Plurabel section is one wild ride.)
And I’m not even an Irish genius!
the mick makes a good point in an earlier comment.
i think it's extremely interesting, how the superlative terms good, better, best, etc used to be synonmous with popular — and how fast that all has changed.
mmmm interesting
:O as if The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins isnt number 1!
"The first introductions students often have to literature are stale century-old books that do not translate well to this new modern era. Frankly they are boring, and a lot of kids drift into the living room and turn on the television and stay glued for the rest of their lives." How are ANY of these books listed any LESS boring than your typical Victorian or earlier novel? When I was a teenager, I know I'd rather read Macbeth, Homer, or Wilde than read some pretentious postmodernism, which nearly all of this is. Aside from Fight Club, which would garner a read because of the movie, literally nothing here is any less "dry" than something from the 1600s. Where Shakespeare is a tough read due to the evolution of the language, Danielewski is a tough read because he purposely includes major story notes in mirrored footnotes in the top right corner. And I know McCarthy would have driven me mad five years ago with his lack of quotation marks, alone, let alone his actual subject matter (which is, in fact, QUITE dry – I love him, but it's true).
Good point, Ophiucha, about the older books. Stale. Theodore Dreiser would be a great more recent example of that.
Guess I was just fortunate. My 10th grade Lit. Teacher got me to read Candide. Then I started on Boccaccio. Haven't given half a hoot about television since.
I read through all of the Sherlock Holmes stories in less than a fortnight, and I typically only read when on break or on public transport. I'm now reading through Jane Austen's works. I've also read most of Jules Verne's well-known novels (the rest I haven't found a copy of), own a number of Oscar Wilde's, and I'm sure I can think of more "stale century-old books" I've read and enjoyed if I think hard.
I don't know many people who don't find at least one pre-1900s novel that they enjoy.
hey, these seem to be very good reads. I friend of mine is an avid book worm and he’s half way through #1 – I’ll have to find out what he thinks about it. He raves about ‘The Road’, and, as per usual for him, insists the movie is such a pale immitation of the book. I can see why some thought Harry Potter would make the list, but seriously, comparing Harry Potter to these intense materials is like comparing Lord of the Flies to Lord of the Rings – there’s just too wide a gap there. That’s not to say HP isn’t intellectually and thoughtfully written, but it’s unlikely to win the booker prize for example. Of course, you could argue the semantics of ‘best’ in relation to an age group or particular readership – and who’s could say whether ‘best’ describes the general consensus or purely a view based on the limited number of materials read by the author? It’s a rhetorical question given that we have a published list, and that the list will not be amended either way.
Your 'Lord of the Flies to Lord of the Rings' comparison doesn't really apply given that they both stand up as incredibly impressive (and, I suppose, scholarly) material, whereas Harry Potter is in an entirely different sort of world from most of the books on this list.
(Despite the fact that I am posting this, I do apologise for my nitpicking).
Great list! Honestly, 'Fight Club' is one of my favourite books. I know that it's definitely not Pahalniuk's best, but it's the one that's stayed with me longest. I love his writing style and the overall themes of the novel capture its generation and the one after (mine) so well.
I found Infinite Jest to be a long, pretentious, difficult read. I had to fight myself to finish that slab of a book.
Wow, nothing by Stephen King or Danielle Steele? That's about all I see at book fairs, flea markets, garage sales, and used book stores. You mean there's other authors in the world?
Thankfully, yes.
Why all the hating with the thumbs down? Could it be that InspectorD is being sarcastic?
I've never gotten the love that Chuck Palahniuk gets, Fight Club is a good, not great IMO, book, then I read Invisible Monsters, again good not great, then Survivor, not so good. By this point it dawned on me that while the stories change Palahniuk is just a formulaic writer where everything is something within something within something else with a bunch of snarky pesudo sarcastic dialogue.
Read Pygmy and Rant, think about what you've said, then maybe you can have a sleepover with your Chicken Noodle Soup for the 'Deep' Reader's Soul.
No Christopher Moore anything by him should be #1!! Fluke, Lamb, Island of the sequined love nun, FOOL, Bite Me, Blood Sucking Fiends, and so many more!
He is my favorite writer. I think "Lamb: The Gospel According to Biff…" might be one of the funniest books I've ever read. Not sure if he belongs on this list, but he's genius in his own right!
Lamb is hysterical. Everything Moore writes is an automatic buy. As was the case with Jerzy Kosinski, Eric Kraft and others. But they don't belong on the list. Middle*****, absolutely, maybe Kavalier and Clay…too many books, too little time.
Reading is gay
Then I bet your head is always in a book.
I'm sorry. I couldn't help but laugh when I read this! The simplicity of it was just hilarious!
Oh, hold up… Let me put this in something you might understand. "Me laughie at your funny"
none of these interest me. i guess i'll just stick with my century old (or older) books.
I took the $1500.00 I would have spent on a 42" flatscreen and spent it on a run of Dodsley's Annual Register of History, Politics and Literature (Edmund Burke, Editor 1758-1788) for the years 1758-1800. Mostly first editions. Each volume (42 of them) has a section of book reviews for the year at the very end. Now I go after them. I've got diverse reading material for the rest of my life.
you picked ten good ones. The Kite Runner was pretty good.
A novel can very well be non fictional. But to reply also to ryan, ive never read the god delusion, but does he develop caracters, multiple threads, action? You know if a book has many pages, that doesnt make it necessary a novel. E.g:The universe in a nutshell can be a great book to vulgarize fundamental physics but hawking will ever never get a nobel prize in literature.
A novel could be non-fiction, but none of the books on this list are.
Interesting list. I haven't read any of them. I own "The Road" and have put off reading it because I need to be in the right mood. I also bought "Infinite Jest" but will probably never read that because I'm not smart enough to get it.
In the video game "Alan Wake" the creators talk about Mark Danielewski's "House of Leaves" as being an inspiration to the game. They also mention Poe's "Haunted" album and commented on how those two different forms of media seem to complement each other. I don't think the guys at Remedy realized they are brother and sister. I've always been meaning to read "House of Leaves" but never got around to buying it.
you all can bash me to the ground but, personally, i thought the road was *****.
Agreed.
you both make me sad… not touched by the road? Please! If you can't carry the fire, go stand in it.
Good list – I read constantly and still there are a few new ones for me. Not so sure about the Ellis book – seems to me that an excellent novel should NOT be torture to read. I'm not talking about vocabulary but sentence structure, plotting, and flow. The whole disjointed, stream of consciousness crap fails to impress me – can't be a great novel if the only folks who it resonates with are literature critics. Margaret Atwood anyone?
The Handmaid's tale ? Epic.
You got here ONLY american novels !!??!?!!…no one here even noticed that fact.
It's sad to see so closed-minded people.
No wonder to see where you are heading now.
(something like nowhere…)
You obviously didnt read all the comments. It had been noticed and pointed out already. And all the replies to that observation answer your comment as well.
Sweet mother of balls. If you want a list of great <insert nationality> books then WRITE ONE!!! I'm sure JFrater will publish it if it's up to scratch.
You can't expect an American contributor to write a list of great Norwegian books for feck sake.
No one will ever be completely happy with any list but I agree with peeyaj…Pi by Yann Martel was mesmerizing.
Hmmm…To other book worms, I would highly suggest "The Perks of Being a Wallflower". One of my most favorite books from the last 20 years. "The Road" is indeed a wonderful book, as is "House of Leaves" I havn't read any of the others. "Life of Pi" was another one i found very entertaining, though a bit preachy at times. My Favorite book of all time however, has to be "Brave New World" it is an awesome awesome read.
Huxley's "Brave New Word" was required reading when I was in highschool and I totally agree with you.
A teacher suggested "The Perks of Being a Wallflower" and I'm glad I listened to her. It's a great young adult book that I would still re-read today. Sadly, I do believe the author Stephen Chbosky did not write any other books.
House of Leaves is a book I recommend to anyone with an open mind, and a curiosity to see how an art form can be pushed. The author makes the written word itself into a kind of visual art.
A "good book" however is not necessarily a phrase I would use to describe it.
thanx!
books are outdated
Oh I don't know. Imagine Listverse, the novel:
'It was late in the day when Br0ck finally went online. Finally, all the struggles of his day- his search for friendship and quest to prove he has an intelligence level above a chimpanzee- could be cast aside for a short period as he revelled in the attention his trite comments garnered. True, it was a shallow, pointless way of life; but, hell, at least it was a life. Far better than what he was doing only six months before…'
I really hope the opening line of LV the book wont be about brock. Maybe it would be the part written on a napkin in the bar that gets moisted with beer and is thrown away by the waiter.
'br0ck read the title of the latest list slowly, tracing the words out with his mouth: "Top 10 Best Novels of the Last 20 Years". His lips peeled back in a grin as he pondered what today's comment would be. "books are gay"? "books are too american"? This one required some thought.
Seven hours later, br0ck struck gold. With a shrill, excited laugh, he began to type: "books….. are….. outdated." With a triumphant yell, he clicked 'submit comment' and awaited the requisite appalled reaction from the Listversers. His grin widened; he'd shat himself again.'
I love you, br0ck.
Brilliant.
you're hilarious
yes —- an ommission from todays list — brock – king of chodes, his puppy dog, a lemon peeler, and the progress of man — by the artist formerly known as the artist who will one day be called woyzek.
thanks for the first 5 sentences — solid #11
you a baaaad mo.fo, boss.
Ah br0ck, yet again you do not disappoint with another ridiculous comment.
Whereas br0jck is out and dating?
So, what do you suggest? I am interested. I've read several of the books listed and have opinions that have varied from some of the other comments. Got new stuff? Please share.
Will someone please inspire me and say that I'll be able to read a whole novel once my children grow up? Once the kids started getting born, it seems the only books I read these days have cartoon animals in them and rhyme an awful lot.
I wish I had more time to read. If you want to read something entertaining, not necessarily "great literature", check out "Apathy and Other Small Victories" By Paul Neilan
Nice list. Literary lists are always a blast.
Edit: Woyzeck wasn't paying attention.
Bonus: almost anything by Peter Carey.
Peter Carey is the man. "Oscar and Lucinda" is slightly older than 20 years now, but is sensational. I've yet to read "True History of the Kelly Gang", but am dying to do so… maybe I'll go and buy it today.
Another modern Australian classic would have to be "Cloudstreet" by Tim Winton… simply glorious and a real favourite.