Top 10 Errors of the Da Vinci Code
- Published September 2, 2007 - 102 Comments
The Da Vinci Code, a popular suspense novel by Dan Brown, generated a great deal of criticism and controversy after its publication in 2003. Additional criticisms were directed towards the book’s inaccurate descriptions of European art, history, architecture, and geography. The Author, in the opening pages of the book, claims that, aside from the modern characters, the book is completely factual. This is a list of the biggest errors in the book.
1. Da Vinci’s The Last Supper
The contention that Mary Magdalene is depicted sitting next to Jesus in Leonardo’s famous The Last Supper is disputed by virtually all art historians. Since there are twelve disciples (including Judas), one would have to be missing for Mary to be present. The figure to the right of Christ, also wearing blue and red, is usually identified as John the Apostle, who was customarily depicted in the Renaissance period as a beardless, often “effeminate” youth with very long hair. The “femininity” of the figure can be attributed to Leonardo’s artistic training in a workshop of the Florentine School, which had a long tradition of often depicting young males as sweet, pretty, rather “effeminate” persons.
2. Priory of Sion
The portrayal of the Priory of Sion as an ancient organization connected to goddess-worship is incorrect: The actual “Priory of Sion” was founded in 1956 by Pierre Plantard, Andre Bonhomme and others, not in 1099 as claimed in the book, and it was named after a mountain in France, not the biblical Mount Zion. Les Dossiers Secrets was a forgery created by Philippe de Cherisey for Plantard. Plantard, under oath, eventually admitted that the whole thing was fabricated.
3. Opus Dei
The depiction of Opus Dei as a monastic order which is the Pope’s “personal prelature” is inaccurate. In fact, there are no monks in Opus Dei, which has primarily lay membership and whose celibate lay members are called numeraries. Moreover, Opus Dei encourages its lay members to avoid practices that are perceived as fundamentalist to the outside world. Silas, the murderous “Opus Dei monk”, uses a cilice and flagellates himself. Some members of Opus Dei do practice voluntary mortification of the flesh, as has been a Christian tradition since at least St. Anthony in the 3rd century and has also been practised by Mother Teresa, Padre Pio and slain archbishop Óscar Romero. Critics charge Brown of greatly sensationalizing the practice of such mortifications and exaggerating the extent of their practice. It is impossible to gain the kind of wounds Silas is described as having from a normal cilice.
4. Rosslyn Chapel
The Chapel is a major feature in the last part of the novel, though many incorrect assertions were made about the structure. For example, Brown’s book states that the Chapel was built by the Knights Templar, and contains a six-pointed Star of David worn into the stone floor although such star has ever been seen in the floor. Many sources say that Dan Brown never visited the Chapel till after the publication of his Da Vinci Code book, and most of his material came from previously published material. Another claim is that the name “Rosslyn” is a form of the phrase “Rose line”, and that a line starting in France also runs through the Chapel. In fact, the name “Rosslyn” comes from two Celtic words: “ros,” meaning promontory or point, and “lyn”, meaning waterfall. As far as the “secret code” that Brown claims exists in the chapel, most recently father and son team, Thomas and Stuart Mitchell, have shown that it is most likely a piece of music. They have decoded the music and you can hear it here. I wonder if Dan Brown plans to give them the reward he offered for its decoding.
5. Problems with Paris
Several claims about the Church of Saint-Sulpice in Paris are disputed. While there is a brass line running north-south through the church, it is not a part of the Paris Meridian, which passes about 100 meters east of it. The line is instead more of a gnomon or sundial/calendar, meant to mark the solstice and equinoxes. Further, there is no evidence that there was ever a temple of Isis on the site. The reference to Paris having been founded by the Merovingians (Chapter 55) is false; in fact, the city was settled by Gauls by the 3rd Century BC. The Romans, who knew it as Lutetia, captured it in 52 BC under Julius Caesar, and left substantial ruins in the city, including an amphitheater and public baths. The Merovingians did not rule in France until the 6th century AD, by which time Paris was at least 800 years old. The novel claims that the top of the Centre Pompidou can be seen from the Arc du Carrousel (chapter 3). This is incorrect. The book erroneously places Versailles to the north-west of Paris, when actually it is approximately 25 kilometers west-south-west of Paris city centre.
6. The Vatican
In the story, it is repeatedly said that the Vatican was the center of power in the early Catholic Church, including reference to “the Vatican” suppressing Gnostic writings in the 4th century. Until the early Renaissance, the papal palace was in different locations, ranging from the cathedral of St. John Lateran, to Anagni, to Avignon. It was not until the 15th century that there was anything like official power in the vicinity of the Vatican Hill in Rome. In the 4th century, the Vatican was little more than a church and cemetery by the side of the road. Also, St. Peter’s is referred to as a cathedral; it is technically a church. St Peter’s is the second largest church in the world, and covers 5.7 acres
7. Mary Magdalene
Historians have disputed the claim that Mary Magdalene was of the tribe of Benjamin. There is no mention of this in the Bible or in other ancient sources. The fact that Magdala was located in northern Israel, whereas the tribe of Benjamin resided in the south, weighs against it. Furthermore, Paul was a Benjamite but makes no mention of this supposed heritage. Mary Magdalene is revered as a saint in France; a cave in the Sainte-Baume mountains of Provence, where she is believed to have lived, is a popular pilgrimage site. It is believed that she died and is buried there.
8. Gnosticism
The book claims that the Gnostic Gospels (e.g. the Gospels of Thomas, Philip, Mary Magdalene, and the recently rediscovered Judas) are far older, less corrupted, and more accurate than the four included in the Bible. With the possible exception of Thomas, the other Gospels date from the 2nd Century through the 4th Century, while the canonical four are thought by most scholars to date from the 1st Century or early 2nd Century. In the story, a character claims that the label “heretic” was used only after the Nicene Council (325 AD), in order to persecute Gnostics. In fact, St Irenaeus used the term “heresy” to label Gnostic teachings in the second century, long before the Church had any political power to persecute anyone.
9. Geography
The book’s storyline that the “Albino Monk” was arrested in France, imprisoned in Andorra and escaped to Spain, demonstrates the lack of basic research that would be gleaned from a quick glance at a map or tourist guide. It is improbable that someone arrested along the French coast would be imprisoned in another country (in this case Andorra which is a different jurisdiction and several hundred kilometers away up in the Pyrenean mountains). After the scene in the Temple Church, London, the heroes of the story take the tube from Temple Station to King’s College. In fact King’s College is nearer to the Temple Church than to Temple Station, and any tube journey would have carried them further away from King’s College. At the start of chapter 104, (Rosslyn Chapel), Brown states “The chapel’s geographic coordinates fall precisely on the north-south meridian that runs through Glastonbury”. This statement is incorrect: Rosslyn Chapel lies on longitude 3:07:13 west and Glastonbury Tor 2:42:05 west. Brown appears to have confused geographic north with magnetic north.
10. Assorted errors
Albinos typically have very poor vision; in fact, many are legally blind. It is therefore highly unlikely that the albino Silas could ever become an expert marksman, or even that he could drive.
It is stated that the Dead Sea Scrolls were found in “the 1950s,” when in fact the initial discovery was made in 1947, with additional documents being located up to 1956.
In his lecture on the Divine Proportion, Langdon states that the proportion of male to female bees in a hive is always in this ratio. This is false, as the ratio can vary widely and is nonetheless usually greater than the Divine Proportion.
In the novel, Brown says the gnostic gospels found in Nag Hammadi, Egypt, in 1945, were “scrolls.” They were actually codices- individual pages bound together as books.
Note: Obviously I would not recommend reading this book – you will be less intelligent after having done so. However, if you want to read an excellent book that covers all of the subjects in the Da Vinci Code as well as others, and does so in an extremely well researched way, I strongly recommend you read Foucault’s Pendulum by Umberto Eco, author of Name of the Rose. You can buy it here.
I will let the New York Times have the last word on this list: “[The Da Vinci Code is] Dan Brown’s best-selling primer on how not to write an English sentence”.
Technorati Tags: Books, da vanci code























September 2nd, 2007 at 5:50 am
Erm, well, it is a work of fiction isn’t it?
September 2nd, 2007 at 6:25 am
ru5ty_nail: Dan Brown states in the first page of the book that it is all based upon historical facts. He has also stated so twice in recent TV interviews. Yes, it is a work of fiction, but Dan Brown claims it isn’t.
September 2nd, 2007 at 7:23 am
saw a program about this on history channel, and while a lot of stuff was wrong…a lot of other stuff was true as well
September 2nd, 2007 at 7:24 am
Kyouki: Can you name some of the things that are meant to be true?
September 2nd, 2007 at 9:11 am
Yes! I was telling my friends the exact same thing. Umberto Eco’s Foucault’s Pendulum is the book that covers these subjects “right”. The thing is though, that i was not telling them not to read Da Vinci’s Code but just read Foucault’s Pendulum FIRST, so that they could understand the fraud. It is just an advertisement trick that there are facts in there. On the other hand I really enjoyed that Da Vinci’s Code made alternative thinking and point of view for religious (flock) matters a trend. I’d also like to point out the script-like (just before the action comes to a climax, the chapter ends) matter that the book is written, which in my opinion shows that the book was targetting a good selling course than “exposing” anything as it was received.
September 2nd, 2007 at 9:58 am
Ugh, DVC has to be one of the worst books I’ve ever read and believe me, I’ve read some clunkers. Considering all the publicity, I got it thinking that even though I’m a non-believer, at least it would be a good read. How very wrong I was.
September 2nd, 2007 at 10:03 am
Fe: You know, when I saw you had replied to this post (on the admin control panel for this site) I just knew you were going to say that! (that is a good thing incidentally)
When I read it I cringed all the way through.
September 3rd, 2007 at 10:12 am
Foucault’s Pendulum is really a great book
September 3rd, 2007 at 11:04 am
marcus: I am glad you agree – one of the best on the subject I think.
September 3rd, 2007 at 8:20 pm
I thoroughly enjoyed the book. The movie was entertaining but not engaging. For the record, I’m an atheist who likes to read. Maybe I’m not critic enough, but I have enjoyed all of Brown’s books. What kills a story for me are typos and grammatically errors. I’m trying to read a Richard Clarke fiction now, and the technical errors stop me cold. At least Dan Brown can write the Queen’s English properly.
September 3rd, 2007 at 10:58 pm
john Stover: unfortunately his writing style has been mocked by many major critics. Any any person who has met an Englishman will cringe at the scenes involving Sir Leigh Teabing. He speak exactly like an American who has never travelled would think an Englishman would speak. Which is, unfortunately for Brown, nothing like the real thing. I was actually embarrassed reading those parts of the book. Even the New Yorker called it “unmitigated junk” and refers to “the crumbling coarseness of the style.”
I think Dan Brown would be better suited writing Romance novels
September 4th, 2007 at 4:57 am
The most egregious error in my view is Brown’s statement somewhere near the beginning of the book that millions of witches were killed by the church. This certainly wasn’t the case and further if that many had been killed, Europe would have been decimated!
September 4th, 2007 at 5:05 am
Suzanne: that is true indeed.
September 4th, 2007 at 9:30 am
Dear friends,
Whatever you say or argue, my simple analysis is what happened to all this critics before the story was written? why all this huf or puff? when you don’t know something or fail to prove simply accept what is existing! There is no harm in it. o.k!
September 4th, 2007 at 8:11 pm
fiction, Dan Brown can say whatever he wants to sell books and if you look at his books as books they are good, well in my opinion anyway. i dont go to Dan Brown for my history so ipso facto i dont giva fuck
September 4th, 2007 at 11:44 pm
fiction: that is good – but unfortunately many people do think they are reading true history.
September 18th, 2007 at 8:11 pm
Well essentially the Da Vinci Code is the watered down mass market paperback version of the far superior Foucault’s Pendulum by ACTUAL historian and Nobel Prize winning author Umberto Eco. Of course, if you read Foucault’s Pendulum, you would know the entire scam in DVC is hokum and probably wouldn’t make it more than a few chapters in without going HOLY CRAP this book is a huge ripoff.
October 16th, 2007 at 9:56 pm
So what exactly is “voluntary mortification of the flesh” as mentioned in #3?
October 17th, 2007 at 1:19 am
heavybison: it means that some Catholics (not just Opus Dei members) use little whips, or other devices to cause mild pain in their bodies – but it is not a requirement of any religious order or the Church itself – it is their own personal practice. You can read a bit more about it on the Top 10 Bizarre Aspects of Catholicism.
November 1st, 2007 at 12:49 pm
Hater in the house!
So what? The bible is fiction, so why wouldn’t a book based on a work of fiction be fiction?
November 1st, 2007 at 12:51 pm
kcnativnla: no where in the bible does it say “this is a work of fact” and then lie – Da Vinci code does
November 1st, 2007 at 1:54 pm
No, its not a “work of fiction” but i dont believe it at all. Why he wouls lie about Jesus and His followers is beond me.
November 2nd, 2007 at 11:34 pm
With regards to the last supper. It says there are 12 desciples or apostles as they are also called.
Apostle means ‘a sent one’(sent by God).
Jesus was sent by God therefore it could be interpreted that he is a apostle. Therefore you have twelve apostles or ones sent by God at the last supper.
This leaves the extra feminine looking person beside jesus who is Mary Magdalene.
How could art historians disprove it. The only person who knows who is in the painting is the artist (and the people in the painting) and Da Vinci is long dead.
November 3rd, 2007 at 1:56 am
Monkey: that is just too far out to be believable – it is known that the person in the middle is Christ – he has all the characteristics of all religious imagery about him up until that time. In addition, Christ could not have been an apostle – he is believed to have been God (certain by Da Vinci) – he could not be an apostle of himself
November 4th, 2007 at 4:01 am
Dan Brown may claim his books are non-fiction, however if you ask me it is a clever ploy to create conterversy and thus more book sales. His books are some of the greatest FICTION out there, and should not be taken as more than so.
November 8th, 2007 at 7:14 pm
Everyone believes what they need to believe to remain comfortable with the “world view” they hold. Fact, fiction…it gets people talking…thinking. From past to present the fact is that people have justified bloodshed in the name of a God…who believed in peace. True peace will never be achieved through any act of aggression. The end does not justify the means…perhaps Brown was attempting to get people to think differently about faith…
November 9th, 2007 at 1:50 pm
Normally, I don’t like getting into religious discussions because it always gets hostile, but seeing as I’m not talking face to face with anyone, I figured I might as well express an opinion. I enjoyed the Da Vinci Code a lot and its one of my favorite books (on the side note jfrater: its kinda offensive calling people less intelligent for reading this book). Whether its fact or fiction, some of it is fiction (Such as the Priory of Sion, and the conspiracy with the Catholic Church). Some of it, however, could be a “possibility,” not a fact. There are no proven “facts” discussed in the Da Vinci Code. I find it very unfair to blame the ideas discussed in the Da Vinci Code on Dan Brown. The truth is, these are ideas and theories that have been around for a few decades now (I recommend more extensive research and check out the book “Holy Blood, Holy Grail”). The idea of Jesus being married to Mary Magdelene has been something that theologians have speculated about for years now. It annoys me when people say there is no evidence to suggest that they were married. This is a untrue statement, there is “evidence” but there is just no “proof.” Proof and evidence are 2 completely different things. “Evidence” states that something is a possibility while “proof” validates it as a fact. Historically, it was jewish traditions state that it was a requirement for men to marry, so it would be unlikely for a jewish male to have been single for that long. Additionally, if you did even more research, they recently discovered a tomb which they believe to be the familial tomb of Jesus, which incfludes the ossuaries of Jesus, The Holy Mary, Mary Magdelene, and what they believe to be the ossuary of Jesus’s child. They have already disproven the possibility that Jesus had a daughter and that they traveled to France to merge with the family line of the Merovingian kings, this was because of DNA evidence. They tested the preserved body of one of the Merovingian queens to see if there were any traces of Middle-Eastern characteristics in her DNA (because Jesus and Mary Magdelene were from Israel). The results showed that her DNA was 100% European, therefore, the bloodline of Jesus could not have interbred with the Merovingians. This is just one theory that was officially disproven, but there is still more evidence to suggest that Jesus could’ve been the spouse to Mary Magdelene. This includes the secrets of the Knights Templar, the gospels absent during the bible, and many more which I do not want to go into detail.
The reason that I’m responding to this list is not because of the disagreement towards the Da Vinci Code, but it was the “passion” in the disagreement. Jesus and Mary Magdelene could’ve been married…….WHO CARES!!! I don’t understand what’s the big deal. So what if he was married, why do people say their faith is being crushed by that? Do you base your faith in Christ on his bachelorhood? No, you’re suppose to base it on the love and peace that he taught all throughout the world. Yes, I am a Christian (a confirmed Catholic to be specific), and I read the Da Vinci Code, and my faith was unaffected. I just thought it was a great mystery thriller and it made me think a little. It made me ask a few questions, but none of which that I thought would alter Christianity. True or not true, this shouldn’t affect peoples faith in any way, and I dont see why people are getting so angry about it. Ladies and Gentlemen, there are many religions all over thew world that are drastically different from christianity and people don’t get into wars over it (ok, well maybe that last one’s not true =]).
The main point is, Christianity shouldn’t be black and white, there can be shades of gray. Attacking people like Dan Brown for expressing his own idea is unfair, and people should always have an open-mind when it comes to religion.
P.S. I know how people are going to respond to me, “Blasphemy! (a word that is like nails on a chalkboard for me =])” “You have no soul!” “You are a disgrace to Christians!” I’ve heard it all. I know I’m never gonna change anyones opinion, I just want to state my own =].
November 9th, 2007 at 1:58 pm
ajr: my complaint with the book is that Brown specifically states that it is fact when it is not. Holy Blood Holy Grail falls for the same hoax over the Priory of Sion so forget that. Mary Magdalene’s tomb is in France and has been venerated as such since well before the middle ages – this seems to me to be more believable than a recently dug up grave that goes entirely against what history has lead us to believe for the last 2 millennia. Oh – and by the way – your faith WAS effected because you believe that Christ married and had a child – according to the Catholic Church that is heresy and excludes you from the Church. So your faith (if unaffected) is not the Catholic faith which teaches that Christ did not marry, and had no children. There is irony in saying you are Catholic and that your faith is unaffected when you espouse Brown’s views in place of your religion’s.
November 9th, 2007 at 1:58 pm
BLASPHEMER! PERSECUTE! KILL!
a lil monty python there
November 9th, 2007 at 2:16 pm
jfrater: I never said that I “do” believe that Christ had a child with Mary Magdelene, I’m just saying it could be a possibility. I think you’re confused on what my faith is. The only thing that matters in the christian faith (whether you’re catholic, protestant, or whatever) is love for CHrist and God. That never changed and little details (such as the Catholic Church declaring the book as heresy and according to your implications, we have to follow that) do not matter. There is no irony in that I was raised Catholic, and I never meant to emphasize that because as I said, I don’t matter if you’re Catholic, Protestant, Believe the possibilities of the Da Vinci Code or disbelieve the possibilities of the Da Vinci Code, as long as there is a love for God, thats the only thing that matters and thats the kind of love that should be spread all over the world (especially if we intend to end all of these religious wars which fight over the irrelevant “details” =])
P.S. I was unaware that they found the tomb of Mary Magdelene in France. Could you tell me where you found that information, because I am interested =]
November 9th, 2007 at 2:25 pm
ajr: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sainte-Baume – that is the place in France where her tomb is – it mentions it in the article and you can look the place up on the net to find their tourist information.
November 9th, 2007 at 3:25 pm
its a f***ing book take it easy and read it
November 9th, 2007 at 3:54 pm
I have to say, Davinci Code was intersting, but it was also like 40 books ago and I had forgotten about it.
Who cares? There are a lot of works of fiction that try to pass themselves off as fact for the sheer marketing aspect of it. (Blair Witch, anyone?)
Code just got to be REALLY popular and people took it as fact. Nobody thought to read the “This is a work of fiction…” disclaimer inside the cover next to the printing history.
Well, surveys have concluded that it’s still necessary to put warnings on hair dryers about how it’s not a good idea to use them in the bathtub. That’s because lots of people are dumb.
If anyone is so easily swayed from 2000 years of tradition and faith because some dude wrote a book, let them be. It doesn’t bother me any
November 9th, 2007 at 7:28 pm
jfrater: thanx 4 the link.
and mitchell bishop and yarr: yeah, it is just a f****ing book. thats what i’ve been trying to tell people =]
November 10th, 2007 at 12:45 pm
In regards to the painting.
To this day there has never been a 100% identifcation of all 12 that sat at the Last Supper with Jesus. In fact it is said by some that at least 15 followers (Not just 12) were there at the time.
November 16th, 2007 at 10:39 pm
Ok. I read this article and went “yeah, ok. He got things wrong. Meh.”. Then I read the comments and I was shocked. IT’S A BOOK PEOPLE! It is thoroughly annoying seeing all of you bicker and snarl at each other over A BOOK. Sure, if it was a preaching on how and who we should worship, then yes, go along with your fighting. After all, that’s all we do when it comes to religion.
Now, I am an bookworm at heart and I personally loved this book NOT because of what it said about religion. But because of the STORYLINE. The ACTION, SUSPENSE and DRAMA.
jfrater: Who do you think you are? And how do people know exactly where Mary Magdelene was buried? Do we have dental records? Actual footage of her being buried there? And on that note, the Bible is so taken as being fact! But where is the proof??? Just because we have nothing to say it is actually not true, doesn’t mean it isn’t!! Like ALL the OTHER religions, it is BELIEFS. LEGENDS.
Also, it IS based on real facts! Just because some things are WRONG doesn’t mean NOTHING is RIGHT.
I may sound like a hypocrite, and *shock horror!* I am actually a Roman Catholic. And if anyone dare says I am a disgrace to my fellow Catholics, let us take a look at other people in the world. WAR. One of the most unpleasent things we HUMANS are capable of. Does everyone realise that war is usually based on three things? Money, land and RELIGION. You think I’m disgraceful? What about the crusades? Christians going out and KILLING other people, calling them “devil-worshippers” just because they believed something different! Jesus is the Son of God and the most loving man ever! What ever happened to “turn the other cheek”? Do you think He would want us to kill other people “in the name of God”? That’s what really gets to me. People who think they are doing the right thing by KILLING FELLOW HUMANS in the name of GOD. What happened to “love thy neighbour”?
I guess it all comes down to the fact it is a BOOK. Books are meant to be read and enjoyed (or put away when it gets boring or annoying ;p). Not cause massive bickering. Thankyou, to whoever wrote this article and enlightening us to Brown’s mistakes. I thank you for the knowledge.
I know this will only make you angrier and say “BLASPHEMER” and continue to grumble. But I just wanted to vent my annoyance. Good day
November 22nd, 2007 at 1:22 am
i actully liked this list
i, like many others, got into the book, eager to know what all the fuss was about
i found the book an average read and i haven’t gone back for a second viewing
i believe the book has caused so much trouble because it has presented an idea in a form easily available to anyone, which suggests that modern people don’t know as much about our history as we would like to think we do
however if dan brown is going to allow for his work to be read by the masses it needs to be understood that it will be evaluated for mistakes and inaccuracies by his readers, like all famous books are
good work jfrater, an interesting read
November 26th, 2007 at 7:44 pm
Annoyed: AWESOME COMPLAINT!!!! I agree with much of what you’re saying and you’re right, as long as people are so narrow-minded with there specific religious details, there will always be war over it and you’re right, Jesus and God would not be happy with all the bitching
Cuz like you said, its just a book =]
November 27th, 2007 at 12:59 pm
meri 10 ma te rendesishmet
December 17th, 2007 at 9:45 am
jrafter: you can be such a bloody asshole. you know that? i used to enjoy listverse. then i realized, jrafter’s top ten fave books?
you’re nothing but an arrogant obnoxious bastard who wants to show he’s better than everyone else.
ajr: i know what you’re trying to say and i understand.
what’s wrong with asking a few questions about your own religion?
faith is not about black and white. sometimes we need to acknowledge that there are some gray areas. but that doen’t mean we have turned our backs on jesus and his message.
jrafter: FUCK OFF ASSHOLE.
December 17th, 2007 at 9:53 am
its a fucking fictional book so stop being such a sissy about it jrafter.
why are you so bent on nailing dan brown?
are you jealous of the money he’s made from making such an erroneous book?
he pulled it off. the book was full of errors but it sold. big time. period.
now will you please stop yapping about it?
the book made people talk about their religion, their faith and think. and that’s a good thing. what’s wrong with that?
people enjoyed the book. okay? no matter what the critics say.
jrafter: its just a book. so don’t get your panties up in a bunch.
December 17th, 2007 at 9:55 am
phoetus1: fuck off.
December 17th, 2007 at 9:59 am
kikiam I am sorry you feel such hatred toward me over my opinions of Dan Brown’s book and my own personal favorite books.
December 17th, 2007 at 10:09 am
kikiam: you say ’stop yapping about it’, yet YOU are the one who brought this up after 20 days of nothing on the subject.
December 24th, 2007 at 11:14 am
Ahaha!
You guys are funny.
Fighting over a book, trying to get the better of each other.
The bottomline here is that it doesn’t matter if Dan Brown’s book is true or false. He got rich off it, and that’s all that matters to him.
Have fun arguing about something that won’t change regardless!
December 30th, 2007 at 6:01 am
I think that this book was written to show for all the people that everybody hav itself opinon and faith. For all of us it book have it own idea.
January 3rd, 2008 at 12:04 am
@dangorironhide:
HAHA!
January 6th, 2008 at 6:58 pm
Stop this debate! Its been going forever!
January 21st, 2008 at 2:51 pm
I’m glad to see that someone has finally had the balls to debunk all of the crass lies in this FICTION NOVEL. Please put that liar Doctor Seuss in his place too.
P.S. – You could also point out that the entire novel centers around Jesus as a historical figure, while there is actually no historical evidence whatsoever that he existed, other than books that surfaces hundred of years later.
January 30th, 2008 at 1:48 pm
Doesn’t really matter if it’s true or not, the writing is simply atrocious. It was given to me as a present and I spent the whole novel feeling insulted by the author’s obvious belief that he was writing for 7-year-olds. I also read Angels and Demons (again, a present…) and spent the first 5 pages absolutely confused, since they were the exact same as The Da Vinci Code; someone obviously bought a computer programme called ‘How to write badly and sell well’.
As for Umberto Eco, although his fiction is fantastic, his non-fiction also deserves to be more widely publicized; it is witty and intelligent, something that is very hard to find these days.
January 31st, 2008 at 10:29 am
I really dont care bout this controversy over the DVC, really who cares?
I personally enjoyed Digital Fortress. I think It had all the things a chapter book really needed: Suspense, Drama, Mystery, Betrayal, and all that crap
February 3rd, 2008 at 4:19 pm
All religion is a complete fraud to gain wealth and power. Jesus was a man, a Jew from the House of David that tried to gain support to become the King of Israel. When the Romans threatened to destroy the Jews over this, they betrayed him, and made up this Messiah nonsense to cover up for their part in the revolt against the throne of Caesar. There is no such thing as God.
February 3rd, 2008 at 4:28 pm
Duke:
And you prove this how? Ok then here’s my version; In modern day people are focused on doing anything to fit in and have fun that they decide to try and disprove the existance of God so they can do whatever they want without regret…see? Doesn’t change your beliefs does it? Neither does your comment change those of anyone who believes in God…you’re not “enlightening” people you’re just trying to start a fight…
February 8th, 2008 at 9:19 pm
I`m with you on Foucault`s Pendulum. I recommend it to all who think DVC is not a complete disaster of a book.
February 9th, 2008 at 9:25 pm
I read this in grade 9 and thought it was fun. I like Dan Brown’s books, even if they do have a habit of repeating themselves. I can see why not everyone would like his minimalistic writing though and get peeved at the ridiculous onslaught of Christian-conspiracy in the media.
FYI Silas was an awesome character!
February 15th, 2008 at 9:57 pm
I really like reading this book…
it really did not matter to me if the english was poor and the grammar was erroneous…all that mattered to me that it gave me good time-pass
it really was paced very nicely…although the movie was a farce (tom hanks was gr8 as usual though)
and a msg for the ppl who are bickering about this whole issue…GET A LIFE MAN !!!
March 9th, 2008 at 12:56 am
No matter what Dan Brown says about the book, the fact of the matter is in every bookstore, it is marketed under fiction.
I do agree that many of the so-called “facts” are doctored to fit the book. And I also attest that this is NOT Dan Brown’s best book. But it’s not because of any poor facts or complete changes to fit the storyline aren’t what make the book not a complete masterpiece.
It’s the fact that the book is poorly written, plain and simple.
March 12th, 2008 at 6:26 pm
I read this book about a year ago. The whole book was a blur and I had a headache after reading it. I didn’t like it at all, but that’s probably because I’m not into religious books. I only read it because everyone else I know had.
April 1st, 2008 at 11:31 am
There would be no issue if not for Brown trying to stir up an issue to push sales. It worked. It’s all fiction. No one is making claims that they believe Jesus and Mary to have married and had children. Anyone that read the book and now believes such to be so… well, those weren’t all that bright before so how would they not be any different?
If not for the way the book was presented… it’d be just a book and nothing more. But some couldn’t leave it at that and here, as in many places since the book was published, people argue and get all twisted up (on both sides) over… a work of fiction.
April 18th, 2008 at 5:00 pm
Actually the Bibile does say it is facts, from the word of God, then it lies. It said that a man (Noah) lived to be over 600 years old (I forget the exact age) and that the Earth is 6000 years old- LIES.
May 16th, 2008 at 9:24 pm
I always had this doubt about Da Vinci Code. Its supporters claim that the effeminate figure besides Jesus in Da Vinci was Magdalene while the Historians and others claim that it was John the Apostle….. but why should something painted in 15th century be considered an accurate description of an event that happened almost 500 yrs ago??? remember we did not have much documented evidence of that time…why should we assume that Da Vinci knew what he was painting about….does this mean that in another 400 yrs ppl will say that Jesus married Mary because a couple of ppl famous in this century, ppl like Dan Brown and Michael Baigent, said so [Forgive me for comparing these mediocre sensation seeking authors to Da Vinci...but am considering the creative dumbing down over the centuries
]
JFrater could you pls explain this to me….
May 16th, 2008 at 9:43 pm
monkey nuts: what is wrong with Dr. Seuss:>
we all know wockets arent real
June 4th, 2008 at 4:44 pm
I know the Brown’s books suck and he lies about nearly everything however I can’t help but read them. They’re like my guilty pleasure.
June 4th, 2008 at 4:45 pm
Yeah, I like Brown’s novels too, but the factual inaccuracy sucks.
June 4th, 2008 at 4:51 pm
Mark: Quite true, all of the people I knew (myself included) believed in a lot of the things he claimed. Thankfully I picked up a book about those claims and most of them proved to be wrong.
Oh well.
June 4th, 2008 at 5:36 pm
Cool. I have a book with a name like “101 Questions about Catholic Tradition and the Da Vinci Code” the title is something like that, and it is a good read. I personally would enjoy any book into refuting the Duh Vinci Code.
June 4th, 2008 at 5:59 pm
Read any of his other titles? I have only recently began reading books other than harry potter and such so I haven’t read any “good” books yet. But I’m trying though:P
June 5th, 2008 at 8:52 am
Ah, yes, I’ve read Digital Fortress, made an attempt at reading Deception Point (didn’t like it) and I intend to get around to reading Angels and Demons soon (I’ve been trying to for years XD). I hear he’s coming out with a new novel this year. That’s what I hear, anyway. It better be good.
June 5th, 2008 at 9:06 am
I’m trying to read Deception Point, you’re right it isnt that “good”.
Yeah I think its going to be called Solomon Key, another Langdon novel. It will be a masterpiece full of lies and it will probably creat a lot of controversy.
Cant wait.
June 5th, 2008 at 9:13 am
Deception Point is a little more “out there” than Dan Brown’s other books. Angels and Demons is pretty good
June 6th, 2008 at 4:13 am
i read somewhere that his new book”Solomon’s key”has something to do with Freemasons and past presidents of United States. I guess he is all set to kick p another shit storm…..
Is it true that a couple of earlier presidents were free masons?
can someone tell me?
June 6th, 2008 at 4:16 am
Geronimo: Yes I think a few of them were, just google it you’ll find out
June 6th, 2008 at 4:20 am
Green: I agree Angels and demons is the best one.
June 12th, 2008 at 1:20 pm
Seeing the Last Supper reminds me of a joke…
What were the last words uttered before the painting was done?
“Everyone who wants to be in the picture get one this side of the table.”
June 12th, 2008 at 1:21 pm
The above should have read “on” instead of “one”
June 25th, 2008 at 12:59 am
Another interesting list. I made the mistake of reading The Da Vinci Code a few years ago. It wasn’t very memorable. I can’t even remember if I noticed any of the errors on the list. But then I never thought that any of the facts in the book were actually facts – I regared them as being on the same level of fiction as the characters and the plot. It was just a book.
Kudos to Dan Brown though for getting more people interested in history even though his writing style wasn’t that great.
June 25th, 2008 at 1:12 am
regarded*
July 9th, 2008 at 12:08 am
This was the worst book I had ever read, and I don’t care in the slightest about whether or not the facts presented were true or not. I’m not a religious person nor an atheist, so the controversy surrounding this book did not affect me. What offended me however was the quality of the writing. It seemed like it was written by a second-grader. It just made me angry that he would actually think he was writing a good book. I read through three-quarters of it just to give it the benefit of the doubt, and then I could stand it no more and threw it away.
July 10th, 2008 at 2:01 am
The Paris Meridian mentioned in The Da Vinci Code is an art project (dated 1994) by the Dutch artist Jan Dibbets, called The Arago Medallions, see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Meridian#The_Arago_medallions
July 14th, 2008 at 2:56 am
the thing that i wanted to see most in this list was the whole “lion king” thing. is that true or not?
September 11th, 2008 at 9:24 am
Lame. The entire time I read the book, all I could think was, “Dan Brown just wants to be famous with his contraversy.” Kudos for a great list.
September 29th, 2008 at 11:55 pm
I haven’t read the book nor seen the movie (fell asleep 10 minutes into the movie. I have zero interest in it). But even if the author Dan Brown says ‘based on historical fact’ etc.
That doesn’t make this a work of non-fiction ANMORE than a hollywood blockbuster with the words ‘based on a true story’ in the opening credits make it a fact based documentary.
It’s a work of fiction, and apparently a good book according to everyone i’ve talked to that’s actually read it (again I have no interest as i’m not the slightest bit religious so i dont care.)
October 2nd, 2008 at 3:25 am
infact, a really cheap novel, I’ve read years befor this novel a historical book, facts proven by documents, that gave a result and lately by ‘carbon testing’ that turned everything arround…, with no certain ending explanation then just this, revealing facts and letting the reader think about that.
I was very dissapointed with the book, the movie after that, but…it achieved it’s point, right? We are talking about it…very much, not to talk about milions of copyes sold! And yes, Dan has become a millionaire, but if he didn’t, we wouldn’t take those…’right books’ into our hands..
Thanks for the list; I’ve noticed just two of those errors by myself.
regards, m.
October 19th, 2008 at 5:49 pm
I actually enjoyed The Da Vinci Code because I took it as fiction and an enjoyable one at that. On the other side, I find Foucault’s Pendulum to be extremely pretentious. I say find because I am in the middle of reading. I used to be a bit of a literary snob but was told by other literary snobs (via a book club) that my selection of a Stephen King novel was, essentially, not good enough for the book club.
So nowadays I look at books for what they are, fun to read. I still read the classics but I enjoy books like the Da Vinci Code. It’s an interesting list but I have to wonder if anybody was really taking anything from this book as fact. Those are the people I’d be a tad worried about. We read fiction to be entertained to be schooled in history.
October 24th, 2008 at 10:21 am
what made it a top seller is because it is controversial..
what made it controversial is that it states thing about the life of Jesus or Mary Magdalen, Christianity as a whole.
People tend to get interested when it comes to controversies in religion..
Personally, I like the story itself, the drama, the suspense and the twist of the story,..but believing it?. It would be so foolish.
The thing is, if it’s true that Jesus has a wife or kids, I wouldn’t care.. Does it affect his teachings on Love and Peace.?
If that fictional book changes your faith…well it’s up to you..
what can I say? your faith is weak.!
October 24th, 2008 at 10:25 am
If we argue about religion, it would be a never ending argument.
Religion is one of the biggest business in the world, second to war,.
It’s better to be more spiritual than being more religious,..
November 7th, 2008 at 5:52 am
Who cares… It is a great book, I picked it up and finished the whole book in 6 hours because I couldnt out it down. It makes you think, regardless of whether it is real or not and the end result is satisfaction and enjoyment. I have actually read it seven times to date and I would read it again!!!
December 15th, 2008 at 4:50 pm
I actually really liked the book too. I read the entire thing in one flight and I have to say that it entertained me the whole way. It also opened my eyes to a debate I had no idea was going on. I ended up buying a lot more books on the subject just because I thought it was fascinating. Even IF Jesus actually married and had children, it really wouldnt affect my faith though I admit I find the possibility fascinating.
February 6th, 2009 at 8:20 am
The Last Supper – let’s say it isn’t Mary Magdelene. Why are the others obviously shocked, pointing and whispering? Also, as it says in the book, Why the extra hand holding the knife? Count the hands, and see for yourself. I actually suggest everyone reads the chapter concerning the painting [I can't remember what chapter it is, though!] and see for themselves all the interesting points.
It may not all be ‘true’ but it is a good book. In my opinion, anyway. Also, everything does seem to fit. I was 14 when i read this and I was deeply intrigued. I’m only 15 now and it is definately in my top 5 books. Obviously, Dan Brown would say anything to get people to buy his book. More publicity and controversy = more money.
February 6th, 2009 at 8:24 am
Fruckert: Lion King
February 10th, 2009 at 9:35 pm
People are so ignorant. It’s a work of fiction! Of course there are things that won’t stand up to fact. Can’t you see the author just manipulated facts to make an interesting story? honestly, it’s fiction people! it’s not even historical fiction. it’s plan old fiction – a made up story.
April 4th, 2009 at 6:48 pm
This is true, but it is fiction (even if the author says its not). it is a good book, at least i think so, and I liked it. It didn’t make me dumber (at least I don’t think:p)
April 13th, 2009 at 7:28 am
it was not a good book, but it was still more entertaining than the boring ass bible lol.
April 17th, 2009 at 2:44 pm
Came across another list I haven’t read. I like finding these!
Ok. I liked the book, hated the movie. I actually got the video game. Try running from Silas at 2:00 am! Scared the pants off me!
I knew it couldn’t have been real no matter if Dan Brown said it was, but it was interesting enough to think about it. I don’t believe in god so it was fun to read.
also…89. Gina: I saw the picture and could only count 25 hands. There should be 26, but I couldn’t find the other 2…the missing one and the extra.
May 20th, 2009 at 1:26 pm
I don’t know…I file most of that under “creative license” which is why it’s a thriller/fiction novel. Anyone who thinks that it’s fact shouldn’t be allowed in public. I think if someone is looking for a page turner with overtones of conspiracty, it’s a good book. Also, it’s a good way to introduce some famous pieces of art to people. A lot of people bought the illustrated version and a lot more people spent some time Googling the paintings Brown talks about.
Most stuff published lately is junk anyway (but junk I rather enjoy). That being said, though, Angels and Demons was a better book.
June 13th, 2009 at 12:57 pm
Dan’s comment on awakening readers’ interest reveals that he still has his own strong motive to make his readers believe the claims and ideas he presents in the book. Dan also reveals to be a spiritual seeker for the rest of his life. It seems that his book The Da Vinci Code shows the guidelines along which Dan is proceeding spiritually. I am very much in doubt that a person whom one of the strongest motivations for life is a lifetime spiritual search, would write something in his book that is meaningless or insignificant to him. The fact is that a person interested in spiritual matters wants to share his spiritual findings and beliefs to others too. This is how I believe that also Dan Brown did when he wrote his book The Da Vinci Code.
http://koti.phnet.fi/petripaavola/DaVinciCode.html
July 12th, 2009 at 2:26 am
Many syncretistic religions formed gnosticism. Gnosticism was rivaling against Christianity and gnosticism held itself better religion as Christianity was. Word gnosticism comes from Greek word gnosis, which means knowledge. Gnosticism was various effects, for instance, some Gnostics taught that divinity can be achieved through unity of the man and woman. This thought led some Gnostics to reach for divinity through sexual intercourse between the man and woman. There existed also some Gnostics, who abstained from sexual intercourse. When we know the fact that Gnostics held Christians as their enemies and that Gnostics held themselves better as Christians and that Gnostics wanted to show in every way that Gnosticism was better as Christianity, so Gnostics made so called gnostic gospels were they twisted, slandered and misrepresented the real gospels. Gnostics went so far in this misrepresent that they wrote “new gospels” by faking the real gospels. In these faked gospels Gnostics wrote that Jesus Christ was an ordinary man who has a sexual relationship with Mary Magdalene.
http://koti.phnet.fi/elohim/marymagdalene.html
September 8th, 2009 at 5:25 am
@jfrater “Oh – and by the way – your faith WAS effected because you believe that Christ married and had a child – according to the Catholic Church that is heresy and excludes you from the Church. So your faith (if unaffected) is not the Catholic faith which teaches that Christ did not marry, and had no children. There is irony in saying you are Catholic and that your faith is unaffected when you espouse Brown’s views in place of your religion’s.”
Catholicism is not faith. There is no such thing as catholic faith. It’s a religion. While the guy’s view on his religion may be altered, there is no irony in him saying his faith is unaffected.
faith is something divine. religion–catholic or otherwise–is just architecture.
September 26th, 2009 at 12:48 am
I agree absolutely that “Foucault’s Pendulum” is the more intelligent older brother to Dan Brown’s idiot child. Other than some quaint and/or erroneous concepts about computing (almost certainly due to the fact that Eco wrote before the use of personal computers became common), FP is essentially error-free, and far, far superior, whether as a work of literature (I know – it’s ludicrous to use the word with regard to TDC) or a treatise on the Templars.
And another thing. I don’t object to Brown’s book on religious reasons, but rather on grounds of accuracy and truthfulness. His “scholarship” is so faulty that it raises questions of his intellectual honesty – which I think must be answered against him. Brown was lazy about facts, snipped and cropped the truth to fit his story, and simply lied about some very basic historical facts and doctrinal points.
Maybe I missed something because I couldn’t finish the book, but it seems to me the worst is the illogic of the internal contradiction of Brown’s story: if Christ was merely human, the resurrection a sham, and the Church the product of two millenia of fraud…then what is the point of the Templars keeping secret and safe the bloodline of a single man?
October 28th, 2009 at 3:35 am
im going to add that comment of, its a tale of fiction Sherlok, although the truth to [some] of the things mentioned are quite interesting, that doesnt mark it as unworthy of reading. In fact i think its a really interesting and noteble read. and im sure the thousands of others who loved it- to the point two of his novels have been made into movies- begs to differ.
November 2nd, 2009 at 1:40 am
It’s been 2 years since you wrote this list jfrater and like DB’s books, it’s still causing a stir. I say, good on you for having the balls to write the list but once you got told to fuck off by someone, you went decidedly quiet. What a shame.
At the end of the day, all propaganda is bullshit. Whether it’s written by old dudes from hundreds of years ago, from a b-grade author who wants money or from some guy that wants to have a popular website. I think I’ve had enough of your ‘lists’ my friend. But at least I’ve bought YOUR book!
November 2nd, 2009 at 9:33 am
Its just a good story and who care if its not all correct i could care less still entertained me and as for his English sentences well i don’t know either and i bet a lot of people don’t give a shit. I highly doubt reading it will effect your intelligence levels unless your stupid enough to take on bord fictional novels as fact which i don’t otherwise id be dreaming about growing up to marry a drop dead gorgeous elf. In saying that Foucault’s Pendulum does actually appeal to me more because i like facts especially if they help me in my many arguments with Christians and my poor RE teacher who has had a hard time of it after i read Letter to a Christian Nation. I am definitely going to read Foucault’s Pendulum and thank you for the recomendation.