First off, you may be surprised to find that Albert Einstein is not included on this list. The reason is that I have used a table of IQ estimates for historical geniuses to determine the members and order of this list, and Einstein’s IQ (around 160) did not make the grade. Despite that, he is still the first person to pop in to most people’s minds when thinking of a genius. Having said that, here is a list of the ten greatest geniuses in history.
10. Madame De Stael IQ: 180Wikipedia
In full – Anne-Louise-Germaine Necker, Baronne (baroness) de Staël-Holstein, byname Madame de Staël. Madame de Stael was a French-Swiss woman of letters, political propagandist, and conversationalist, who epitomized the European culture of her time, bridging the history of ideas from Neoclassicism to Romanticism. She also gained fame by maintaining a salon for leading intellectuals. Her writings include novels, plays, moral and political essays, literary criticism, history, autobiographical memoirs, and even a number of poems. Her most important literary contribution was as a theorist of Romanticism. Madame de Stael is on an equal level with René Descartes but I chose to include her rather than him in order to put at least one woman on this list.
9. Galileo Galilei IQ: 185Wikipedia
Galileo was Italian natural philosopher, astronomer, and mathematician who made fundamental contributions to the sciences of motion, astronomy, and strength of materials and to the development of the scientific method. His formulation of (circular) inertia, the law of falling bodies, and parabolic trajectories marked the beginning of a fundamental change in the study of motion. His insistence that the book of nature was written in the language of mathematics changed natural philosophy from a verbal, qualitative account to a mathematical one in which experimentation became a recognized method for discovering the facts of nature. Finally, his discoveries with the telescope revolutionized astronomy and paved the way for the acceptance of the Copernican heliocentric system, but his advocacy of that system in support of his view that the Bible contained errors, eventually resulted in an Inquisition process against him.
8. Bobby Fischer IQ: 187Wikipedia
Bobby is the byname of Robert James Fischer, an American chess master who became the youngest grandmaster in history when he received the title in 1958. His youthful intemperance and brilliant playing drew the attention of the American public to the game of chess, particularly when he won the world championship in 1972. Fischer learned the moves of chess at age 6 and at 16 dropped out of high school to devote himself fully to the game. In 1958 he won the first of many American championships. In world championship candidate matches during 1970–71, Fischer won 20 consecutive games before losing once and drawing three times to former world champion Tigran Petrosyan of the Soviet Union in a final match won by Fischer. In 1972 Fischer became the first native-born American to hold the title of world champion when he defeated Boris Spassky of the Soviet Union in a highly publicized match held in Reykjavík, Iceland. In doing so, Fischer won the $156,000 victor’s share of the $250,000 purse.
7. Ludwig Wittgenstein IQ: 190Wikipedia
in full – Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein was an Austrian-born English philosopher, regarded by many as the greatest philosopher of the 20th century. Wittgenstein’s two major works, Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung (1921; Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, 1922) and Philosophische Untersuchungen (published posthumously in 1953; Philosophical Investigations), have inspired a vast secondary literature and have done much to shape subsequent developments in philosophy, especially within the analytic tradition. His charismatic personality has, in addition, exerted a powerful fascination upon artists, playwrights, poets, novelists, musicians, and even filmmakers, so that his fame has spread far beyond the confines of academic life.
6. Blaise Pascal IQ: 195Wikipedia
Blaise Pascal was a French mathematician, physicist, religious philosopher, and master of prose. He laid the foundation for the modern theory of probabilities, formulated what came to be known as Pascal’s law of pressure, and propagated a religious doctrine that taught the experience of God through the heart rather than through reason. The establishment of his principle of intuitionism had an impact on such later philosophers as Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Henri Bergson and also on the Existentialists.
5. John Stuart Mill IQ: 200Wikipedia
John Stuart Mill was an English philosopher, economist, and exponent of Utilitarianism. He was prominent as a publicist in the reforming age of the 19th century, and remains of lasting interest as a logician and an ethical theorist. Mill was a man of extreme simplicity in his mode of life. The influence that his works exercised upon contemporary English thought can scarcely be overestimated, nor can there be any doubt about the value of the liberal and inquiring spirit with which he handled the great questions of his time. Beyond that, however, there has been considerable difference of opinion about the enduring merits of his philosophy.
4. Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz IQ: 205Wikipedia
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (also Leibnitz or von Leibniz (July 1 (June 21 Old Style) 1646 – November 14, 1716) was a German philosopher of Sorbian origin who wrote primarily in Latin and French. Educated in law and philosophy, and serving as factotum to two major German noble houses (one becoming the British royal family while he served it), Leibniz played a major role in the European politics and diplomacy of his day. He occupies an equally large place in both the history of philosophy and the history of mathematics. He discovered calculus independently of Newton, and his notation is the one in general use since. He also discovered the binary system, foundation of virtually all modern computer architectures. In philosophy, he is most remembered for optimism, i.e., his conclusion that our universe is, in a restricted sense, the best possible one God could have made.
3. Emanuel Swedenborg IQ: 205Wikipedia
Emanuel Swedenborg was a Swedish scientist, Christian mystic, philosopher, and theologian who wrote voluminously in interpreting the Scriptures as the immediate word of God. Soon after his death, devoted followers created Swedenborgian societies dedicated to the study of his thought. These societies formed the nucleus of the Church of the New Jerusalem, or New Church, also called the Swedenborgians.
2. Leonardo Da Vinci IQ: 205Wikipedia
Leonardo Da Vinci, Italian painter, draftsman, sculptor, architect, and engineer whose genius, perhaps more than that of any other figure, epitomized the Renaissance humanist ideal. His Last Supper (1495–98) and Mona Lisa (c. 1503–06) are among the most widely popular and influential paintings of the Renaissance. His notebooks reveal a spirit of scientific inquiry and a mechanical inventiveness that were centuries ahead of their time. The unique fame that Leonardo enjoyed in his lifetime and that, filtered by historical criticism, has remained undimmed to the present day rests largely on his unlimited desire for knowledge, which guided all his thinking and behaviour.
1. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe IQ: 210Wikipedia
Goethe, German poet, playwright, novelist, scientist, statesman, theatre director, critic, and amateur artist, is considered the greatest German literary figure of the modern era. Goethe is the only German literary figure whose range and international standing equal those of Germany’s supreme philosophers (who have often drawn on his works and ideas) and composers (who have often set his works to music). In the literary culture of the German-speaking countries, he has had so dominant a position that, since the end of the 18th century, his writings have been described as “classical.” In a European perspective he appears as the central and unsurpassed representative of the Romantic movement, broadly understood.
Sources: Genius IQ Estimates, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Wikipedia






























extend the list!
Why should we?!?!
White Power
I am surpized that I wuz lef off the list. My teacher actually said yesterday, “Junior, you are a real genius, just a real genius”. I wood appreciate some respeck and should be menshuned.
ive taken like a bunch of online IQ tests and ive gotten like 130s and 140s, so that was pretty cool but i don’t think the tests are much too accurate
this list is ridiculously stupid.
1. how can you base how smart some one is by their iq? if there was a conversion rate to how intellegint you are between early cavemen and the modern humans today, the cavemen who invented tools, weapons, refining ores etc would greatly outrule these geniuses. Dont kid me wrong these people are great, but think about who youre dealing with before you post lists like this.
2. This would be a much greater list if you mentioned the schooling they had. Because if there was a super genius with an iq of 278 just say, it would be a bias atatement because they would have some kind of 12 hour day mind training.
3.The iq gets ruled out again, because you dont need an iq of 210 to understand atoms, and the great lord ernest rutherford isnt even on this list and he discovered very important information about atoms that is being taught in my extension science class this year, and i am only 13!.
where’s vos savant and Akrit Jaswal, the indian prodigy? both are regarded as having extremely high iq’s.
Everyone hear is French, Italian or German.
No composers? Beethoven, Mozart? Mozart composed a concerto at age 8
Mozart composed a concerto at age 8
Yes, but it wasn’t very good! Who plays it now?
This list is foolish. Genius and IQ have a very weak relationship to each other. Some geniuses may not have a high IQ because IQ tests see how well you can do monotonous logic problems over and over again where as true genius like that of Mozart or Einstein is based on creativity. They likely would not bore themselves with doing a bunch of monotonous logic puzzles day and night that already have an answer and rather create new things. Thus, many geniuses would not have that high of an IQ. Look at Mariam Vos Savant. Her IQ is super high and you can tell from her commentary that she has a very logical step by step thinking style good for logic puzzles, but there is NOTHING about her that shows she can think outside the box or in new, interesting and abstract ways. She will never produce anything great and historically significant with her super high IQ and the mark of genius is to be able to create great and new things. Thus IQ is a terrible determinate of genius and cannot measure creativity.
Ah. Leonardo got second. Oh well great list
By current standards, Mozart should be at the very top, even ahead Sidis, or what score would result if an IQ test was applied to toddler mozart? or to 6 year old Mozart? or to a pre-teen Mozart capable of composer complex classical pieces?
Do you reading at young age is more complex than playing the violin pretty well at young age, for instance?
BTW…Kasparov IQ is NOT 190…check
http://education.arts.unsw.edu.au/fidestudy/results
“However, in 1987 German
newsmagazine Der Spiegel arranged for a team of psychologists to test Garry Kasparov’s
abilities. He indeed had a high but not spectacularly high IQ score (well over 120) ”
MUSIC is the TOP INTELLIGENCE BOOSTER, not chess, reading or other activities suggested here….
check
http://www.rotman-baycrest.on.ca/index.php?section=225
where the hell is einstein
blaise pascal should be first by far, he contributed and was in his time the best in nearly all fields you can imagine:
math, litterature, physics, mecanics (invented the first calculator), initiated public transportation, philosophy ( read pascal and youll have a more complete version of everything you can find in philosophy today),
i personnally read pascal, and i have no use for reading anything else, its mind blowing and scary as hell. the world you know as it is today wouldnt be the same if pascal hadnt existed, and i dont think any other "genius" could pretend as much.
Why does’t thou write so many words??????
Isaac Newton. duh.
This list is ridiculous. IQ testing was not around when these people graced the earth! What means were used to determin IQ level?? Granted that most had stellar IQs. What about Nikola Tesla? He would have to rank as one of the highest IQs in history surely?
Kim Ung-yong is missing
I guess achievements is a requirement here, that’s why Von Savant, Sidis or the korean guy woud be outside.
FWIW check this about the intelligence myths on William James Sidis…
http://thelogics.50webs.com/thelogicsmyths.html
When you see an apparently abnormal intelligence without training, there’s always a catch….even Mozart, the ultimate prodigy, had extremedly hard training….so you can safely guess a lot of training behind every kind of prodigy.
However, I wouldn’t go the the latest trend, saying that ‘talent’ is overrated and implying that training alone can do the trick… evidence says that both are requirements and neither can work alone…
It seems strange to me to put Da Vinci lower than Goethe. Also, leaving out Issac Newton and Einstein… these men have influenced the world in so many ways, regardless of what their IQ’s may have been. And don’t forget Beethoven, Mozart, and Bach as well. As Ray said, while genius and IQ are related, IQ is not the only measure of genius. Genius is more the ability to innovate and come up with new ideas rather than just some score on a test.
I’m surprised no medieval Muslim polymaths were included, considering their inventions of the numerical system we all use, the decimal point, algebra etc. Nonetheless I’m glad to see a list of geniuses which is based on achievement rather than merely IQ.
Bobby fischer became an icelandic citizen before he died, so technically, he’s not american…
i think minds and peoples iqs are very interesting to me and have an imense impact on our societies wether it be good or bad rich middle class or poor. warren buffet, jesus christ, socrates, albert einstein, mozart and others are some i can mention form the top of my head but are some historical figures geniuses or mad men like alexander the great, hitler, lenin, genghis kahn, pablo escobar, lucky luciano are a mix of intelligence, smarts and could it also be geniuses? maybe, maybe not.
Coming up with something like estimated IQ is ridiculous.
Coming up with ANY sort of reason to exclude Albert Einstein is even MORE ridiculous.
Isaac Newton ???
Nikola Tesla ???
Srinivasa Ramanujan ???
Oh man you got to be kidding me..!!
I believe that another artist should have been put up into this top list. Andrew Wyeth.
WHERE IS MICHELANGELO ????ANYWAY I THINK LEONARDO DA VINCI SHOULD BE 1
I’m sure more women would be on the list if more women throughout history had been granted access to education and were taken seriously in the political, philosophical, literary, and scientific fields. It’s sad to think how many women could be considered among the great but who were born in a time and place of repression that didn’t allow them to utilize their potential.
And what is wrong with this website that it seems to break down every five minutes every day?
I agree with most of the people on the list, but im not agreeing with the order. Besides that, great list.
I agree with this list by Avi who posted it above.
“the first ppl to come in to mind when i think of geniuses: from 1 to 10, newton, einstein, da vinci, nikola tesla, edison, galileo, stephen hawking, mozart, ben franklin, darwin”.
I think your under the misconception that genius is based on IQ which it’s not. Genius is based partly on logical intelligence (measured by IQ) but is mainly based on great imagination/creativity/ability to formulate new and significant ideas which there is no test for except that person’s impact on humanity and critical review of their work. Bobby Fischer has a high IQ but doesn’t even come close to the creativity/imagination of people like Einstein or Mozart.
according to this list, the highest IQs have only belong only to white European people. BULL*****. lets discuss the topic of cultural bias……
cultural bias? what about ACHIEVEMENTS? do they also have cultural bias?
I agree a genius list should be based in achievements not on estimated IQ….but apart from thar, you can’t negate ACHIEVEMENTS, those are beyond cultural limitations, isn’t it?
Wich non-european ethnic person(this excludes US and Canada) would you say to have had more impact in mankind knowledge than Da Vinci, Nietzsche, Socrates, Darwin, Einstein, Bohr, Shakespeare?
Perhaps just a few, but you can’t deny that the bold of the achivements came from european ethnicity….isn’t it?
I guess we (non-europeans) should stop complaining and start WORKING in improving the love to knowledge of our generations…like some ASIAN countries are doing now with their kids. And they’re seeing RESULTS.
In many third world countries they still claim for ‘keeping our traditions’ when such traditions are more of a bruden than an asset….
If ‘our culture’ is helding is back, then let’s get rid of such culture….let’s get involved in helping our relatives more worried about knowledge and science than about ‘our traditions’…isn’t it possible?
History is often written with cultural bias. great minds who are not within the realm of the specific culture are often cast aside.this isn’t complaining, this is just as part of history.
The first IQ test was invented in the early 1900′s by a certain Alfred Binet. There were intelligent tests in some parts of the world, but none of them would yield what we understand as an IQ score. My question is a simple one. How could the likes of Galileo and Da Vinci have taken a test that didn’t exist yet? If they didn’t, how could you know their IQ’s?
#
149. RL – April 15th, 2009 at 1:33 am
I think your under the misconception that genius is based on IQ which it’s not. Genius is based partly on logical intelligence (measured by IQ) but is mainly based on great imagination/creativity/ability to formulate new and significant ideas which there is no test for except that person’s impact on humanity and critical review of their work. Bobby Fischer has a high IQ but doesn’t even come close to the creativity/imagination of people like Einstein or Mozart.
——————————————
Spot on, RL!
what about Michael Scoffield? is he not included on the list?
WOW!I am impressed. But were are miare cure,plato and who said that the IQ of A.Einseitn’s is around 160 I thought he was the best.
to #126 astraya – haha you are ignorant!! maybe u should buy tickets to a classical music concert around town. the alphabet song? twinkle twinkle little star?? who composed this as a child? MOZART!! my friend… we still sing the tunes today dont we?
this list is ridiculous as has been mentioned one too many times. maybe you should make your own list instead of copying from britannica or something>
i would but im not bothered enough.
where are the asians? apparently not smart enough to compete with the other contenders…
He didn’t compose that as a child. He wrote variations on the tune that someone else wrote, when he was 25.
I’ll put my bachelor’s degree and three diplomas in music and 30 years performing, teaching, composing and arranging up against anything that you’ve got.
WHHAAA?
NO NICOLA TESLA? THE BIGGEST GENIUS EVER BORN–
sorry! bad list gentlemen !
capt ajit vadakayil
RIP BOBBY FISHER
Interesting list, but IQ is overrated.
tesla ftw.
wtf
what is with this list? i can’t seem to understand how you came to such an absolute value of iq, for people who you know practically nothing about. All you write about is the few points people actually know of these “geniuses” were, and you are deriving a iq and order based on those few facts. Not to mention iq test are the most pathetic test ever invented by man kind, when it comes to accuracy of what they are designed to prove.
not to mention where is Newton, the greatest mind the world has ever seen? or Einstein, who is arguably Newton’s “second coming”? Aristotle or any of the other great greek minds, who thought centuries above their time.
so in all honesty this is a terrible list as perhaps only 1 of your 12 deserve to be there and even then they are out of rank!
every iq test are caduc before 1950
Got to agree with a few earlier comments. This is not a list of geniuses, it is a list of IQ’s or supposed IQ’s.
I would like to see this list rewritten to reflect what serious genius has contributed, the likes of Einstein for example, Da Vinchie must stay of course.
Having a vast IQ does not make you a genious as IQ testing is a general test. Most people who are genious specialise in only a few fields of study.
The other matter is defination of genious when it comes to which field the work in, Military genious, scientific, artistic, literary or possibly comedy.
I read this list with interest but thought it ill thought out.
there are many many more geniuses in the world, and you can’t judge on how clever they are compared to others just by IQ, its all about what they do best that contibuted to the world!
@ yif: I agree with you. Besides, it also does not matter if they are White, Black or Asian. What’s important is that they had ‘did their best to contribute something good to the world.’
you are dumb.. you cant simply say a person is a genius based on their IQ…there are so many other factors to be considered stupid! How the hell did Madame De Stael helped change th world?? or Even her era!!
Sorry Mister but your list is Disrespectful, Biased, and to put it bluntly STUPID (like you).
Who came up with this iq test thing coz I thing it’s missing something.Its not that all minds have to b measured using the same technique!!!!!!!
Has this guy considered some of Africa’s best.I mean the likes of Shaka,if u read yo history carefully u will find that the guy was gud at what he was doing.
Should have included Leonard Euler over Pascal.
talk about pulling numbers out your ass. yeah, pascal, the author of one cute trick and mountains of rubbish, had an IQ a full standard deviation above any human being alive today.
hint, half the human beings EVER born are alive right now.
Oh my God, no Ramanujan here…..that’s gross!
It’s amazing how ridiculous many of these posts are – we’ve got everything here: complete and utter stupidity, racism, shouting and various other clueless nonsense… oh well, at least some of it is funny!
geniuses are *****able autistic savants that are abnormal because of their impaired social life and devotion to such passion which would not help them view the real essence of existence..
this “real essence of existence” being what, exactly?
Surprised not to see von Neumann, or Helmholtz. Newton, too. But I guess he wouldn’t want to share a list with Leibniz.
Euclid, but maybe his IQ isn’t 180 or over.
(@?-#177) what makes us smart are those things that fascinate us. as person with great IQ, it is in their nature to question everything and would like to know everything, they would like to solve mysteries of natural phenomena with precise and scientific basis and would not want to rely on fantasy which every average person specially in the ancient times does. they are totally preoccupied with these enigma that they tend not to engage to a simple, foolish and ignorant life and interact with average people leaving their scientific thoughts behind.. they died with great uncertainties and regrets for not knowing everything and suffer from nervous breakdowns. the real essence of existence is to be self actualized, do you think their great scientific achievements would make them self actualized? being self actualized is at the top level of maslow’s hierarchy of needs..