Top 10 Evil Scientists
- Published November 18, 2007 - 123 Comments
Throughout time, scientist of one school or another have contributed great innovations to the world of medicine, alchemy, chemistry, physics, and more. Most of these gifts have been exceedingly useful and set the stage for even greater advances in the field. However, the coin has another side… a far more sinister and selfish side that somehow twists the very minds of the scientists making them want to do more harm than help. Granted, said scientific minds often believe that the evils that they are ultimately performing are doing good, and this is what truly makes these individuals mad. Here are ten of the most diabolical scientific minds in history.
10. Paracelsus 1493-1541
Switzerland, Paracelsus’ contributions to toxicology were based heavily in astrology and he is quite well known for offering the community a wide array of useful ideas and innovations. However, for all of his use, he also thought he might be able to create homunculi, or small humans, who stood no more than a foot or so hight and performed actions very similar to Golems. His are said to have run away after turning on their master. The homunculus creation used bits of people including semen and hair.
9. Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer 1904-1967
Heading up the Manhattan Project, the very group responsible for the creation and use of the atomic bomb, Dr. Oppenheimer was a brilliant nuclear physicist. Oppenheimer said he was “a member of just about every Communist Front organization on the West Coast,” a subscriber to the People’s World, a Communist Party organ, and, he testified, “I was associated with the Communist movement.” He claimed to be horrified by the result of the project’s work. A co-worker, Victor Weisskopf said:
He did not direct from the head office. He was intellectually and even physically present at each decisive step. He was present in the laboratory or in the seminar rooms, when a new effect was measured, when a new idea was conceived. It was not that he contributed so many ideas or suggestions; he did so sometimes, but his main influence came from something else. It was his continuous and intense presence, which produced a sense of direct participation in all of us; it created that unique atmosphere of enthusiasm and challenge that pervaded the place throughout its time.
8. Alfred Nobel 1833-1897
Discovering the use of nitroglycerine in his invention of dynamite, Nobel gave the world its first mass-produced use of deadly explosives. Killing first his own brother Emil and several others in a factory accident, the future death toll from his creation will number in the hundreds of thousands. Eventually he used his significant earned wealth to fund the yearly Nobel Prize to distract people from his invention, after reading his own obituary (mistakenly printed as he was not actually dead) which called him the “Merchant of Death”.
7. Trofim Lysenko
While his experiments did not result in mass deaths, Lysenko needs to be on this list for his utter dishonesty in the field of Science that ultimately set the Soviet Union back decades in research. Lysenko was director of the Institute of Genetics and specialized in agricultural research. Lysenko’s habit was to report only successes. His results were based on extremely small samples, inaccurate records, and the almost total absence of control groups. There can be no doubt that there has never been such an abuse of the name of science as that of Lysenko. Here is a quote:
“In order to obtain a certain result, You must want to obtain precisely that result; if you want to obtain a certain result, you will obtain it …. I need only such people as will obtain the results I need.” Lysenko
6. Dr. Jack Kevorkian 1928
Kevorkian is most noted for publicly championing a terminal patient’s right to die via physician-assisted suicide and claims to have assisted at least 130 patients to that end. Imprisoned in 1999, he served eight years out of his 10-to-25-year prison sentence for second-degree murder in the 1998 poisoning of Thomas Youk, 52, of Oakland County, Michigan. The judge that convicted him said:
“You were on bond to another judge when you committed this offense, you were not licensed to practice medicine when you committed this offense and you hadn’t been licensed for eight years. And you had the audacity to go on national television, show the world what you did and dare the legal system to stop you. Well, sir, consider yourself stopped.”
Regardless of your views on euthanasia, the fact remains that Kevorkian swore an oath to save lives, not to take them.
5. Members of the Tuskegee Study
For forty years between 1932 and 1972, the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) conducted an experiment on 399 black men (mostly impoverished and poorly educated share-croppers) in the late stages of syphilis. The essence was to gather data on the course of the disease when left untreated. The researchers understood from the outset that test subjects would provide most of their useful information in the form of autopsies, so great pains were taken to insure that subjects didn’t obtain medical care elsewhere. The program came to an abrupt halt in 1972 when its existence was made public by the Washington Star. It would be easy to dismiss this as a case of simple racism by a public institution, but that is not the case: The project was enthusiastically hosted by the Tuskeegee Institute, a historically black college, and many key researchers and staff on the project were, themselves, black.
4. Johann Konrad Dippel 1673-1734
Dippel was born at Castle Frankenstein and is rumored to be the inspiration for Shelley’s vile doctor. This is disputable, but what isn’t is the fact that this brilliant doctor performed vivisections on many recipients. Working with nitroglycerin he destroyed a tower, but also detected the medicinal use of it. It is rumored that he also preformed gruesome experiments within this tower with so called “cadavers”. Though the actual details of the experiments have never been truly confirmed it is rumored that he attempted to transfer the soul of one cadaver into another. Interestingly, his greatest contribution to the world was his animal oil (Dippel’s oil: a nitrogenous by-product of the destructive distillation manufacture of bone char) commonly known as a base product in Prussian blue – the low cost blue dye that is used to this day by artists; previously, blue dies were extremely expensive to create.
3. Dr. Sigmund Rascher 1909-1945
Rascher was a despicable scientist during the Nazi use of concentration camps during WWII. Rascher’s infamous medical experiments at the Dachau concentration camp included hypothermia research in which three hundred test subjects were used against their will (one third of them perished), in high-altitude, malaria and medication experiments. At Dachau, Rascher also developed the standard cyanide capsules, which could be easily bitten through, either deliberately or accidentally. Ironically, this became the means by which Himmler (Rascher’s friend) committed suicide.
2. Dr. Joseph Mengele 1911-1979
Mengele gained notoriety chiefly for being one of the SS physicians who supervised the selection of arriving transports of prisoners, determining who was to be killed and who was to become a forced laborer, and for performing human experiments on camp inmates, amongst whom Mengele was known as the Angel of Death. On several occasions he killed subjects simply to be able to dissect them afterwards.
1. Shirō Ishii 1892-1959
Ishii was a microbiologist and the lieutenant general of Unit 731, a biological warfare unit of the Imperial Japanese Army during the Second Sino-Japanese War. He was born in the former Shibayama Village of Sanbu District in Chiba Prefecture, and studied medicine at Kyoto Imperial University. In 1932, he began his preliminary experiments in biological warfare as a secret project for the Japanese military. In 1936, Unit 731 was formed. Ishii built a huge compound — more than 150 buildings over six square kilometers — outside the city of Harbin, China.
Some of the numerous atrocities committed by Ishii and others under his command in Unit 731 include: vivisection of living people (including pregnant women who were impregnated by the doctors), prisoners had limbs amputated and reattached to other parts of their body, some prisoners had parts of their bodies frozen and thawed to study the resulting untreated gangrene. Humans were also used as living test cases for grenades and flame throwers. Prisoners were injected with inoculations of disease, disguised as vaccinations, to study their effects. To study the effects of untreated venereal diseases, male and female prisoners were deliberately infected with syphilis and gonorrhea via rape, then studied. A complete list of these horrors can be found here.
Having been granted immunity by the American Occupation Authorities at the end of the war, Ishii never spent any time in jail for his crimes and died at the age of 67 of throat cancer.
Bonus: Daedalus
Granted he is a character of legend, but Daedalus deserves a place on any list of this type because he is probably the first recorded mad/evil scientist. Daedalus is often credited with inventing the very first labyrinth in which he imprisoned the step-son of King Minos, a minotaur. He is also, sadly, charged with killing his own son, though inadvertently, by creating Icarus and himself a set of wings used to escape his very own labyrinth. Icarus didn’t heed his father’s warnings about flying too close to the sun, thus melting his wings and plummeting to the earth.

























November 18th, 2007 at 3:53 pm
hmm…interesting…nobel was evil?
November 18th, 2007 at 3:58 pm
Fruckert: his obituary did call him the merchant of death! It is more the consequence of his invention that is evil though – it even killed his own brother.
November 18th, 2007 at 3:59 pm
oh – and I am surprised he was the first one picked out for controversy – I expected it to be Oppenheimer.
November 18th, 2007 at 4:01 pm
i was just mildly surprised, although my lack of history knowledge is probably to blame for that
November 18th, 2007 at 4:02 pm
Well- if nothing else I hope the lists are at least partially educational
November 18th, 2007 at 4:04 pm
I agree that Mengele should be the worst. I did a paper on him my freshman year of HS and he was NUTS!
November 18th, 2007 at 4:04 pm
i apologize for the double post but why do you think that Oppenheimer was going to be the first controversial subject? he invented the most devastating weapon from what i know, that is until someone invents the sattelite laser…then were going to go all starcraft on eachother and own EVERYONE…
November 18th, 2007 at 4:08 pm
why cant i edit?
November 18th, 2007 at 4:49 pm
I have to respectfully disagree about Kevorkian, because I don’t see the evil in allowing people to choose how they will end their lives. I’ve always thought that ‘do no harm’ would be better expressed with ‘allow no harm’. Which causes more harm, allowing someone to choose to end the pain or abdicating responsibility by bleating ‘do no harm’ and condemning someone to live out their days in pain?
Also, I would have put Oppenheimer closer to the top of the list, but that’s my personal feelings. As horrible as the Holocaust was and I fully agree the men responsible are among the most evil creatures ever spawned, Oppenheimer basically gave us the keys to the gun cabinet and showed us how to load an Ak-47.
November 18th, 2007 at 4:52 pm
Come on, Teller was way more evil than Oppenheimer!
November 18th, 2007 at 5:12 pm
Note, the black male physician in the Tuskegee photo was not involved with the study. The black female nurse, however, was involved with it for its entire duration.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_Study_of_Untreated_Syphilis_in_the_Negro_Male
November 18th, 2007 at 5:16 pm
Oppenheimer over Teller? He should really be on the list, he was nuts and he loved H-bombs.
“Over the course of his life, Teller was known both for his scientific ability and his difficult interpersonal relations and volatile personality, and is considered one of the inspirations for the character Dr. Strangelove in the 1964 movie of the same name.”
November 18th, 2007 at 5:21 pm
Why is Bill Nye the Science Guy not on here….he was EVIL!
November 18th, 2007 at 5:26 pm
I also disagree about Kevorkian. Do you really think its “evil” to allow a terminally ill person to die with dignity and end their own suffering? Your description of him makes it sound like he killed people for the Hell of it, or just to piss off the medical establishment. You also gloss over the fact that his machine is quick and painless and that he only allows those of sound mind to use it.
November 18th, 2007 at 5:34 pm
I say no to Oppenheimer’s inclusion. To start with, the Nazis almost had the bomb by the end of WWII and the USSR would have gotten it anyway without Oppenheimer’s work. The atomic bomb has only been used twice and, IMAO, was the right move but that is a different discussion.
To compare the bomb to an AK-47 is facetious at best, if not pure demagoguery. An atomic bomb is extremely difficult to construct and maintain even with the correct blueprints. Thus, it is simply impossible to for it to be created by anyone other than a nation, and a powerful (and thus hopefully competent) nation at that. Due to MADD (mutually assured destruction), nuclear nations won’t attack each other. Some (not including myself since it’s a complicated topic) would even go as far as to say the bomb has made the world far safer than ever.
November 18th, 2007 at 5:54 pm
I would say that Daedelus, Oppenheimer, Kevorkian and Lysenko do not deserve to be on this list.
November 18th, 2007 at 6:30 pm
Wow, good list. I agree with all of them. And I know that my high school history teachers did not fail me– I have heard of nearly all of these people and what they did! Horrific.
November 18th, 2007 at 6:50 pm
My junior high school (now called a middle school) was named for Nobel. I had no idea he did such evil things.
November 18th, 2007 at 6:59 pm
Bruno: Nuclear deterrence, as a theory, is outdated. It assumes that all nuclear agents are stable and rational-minded, that they are concentrated in one area, and that they, too, would be fearful of mutual destruction. In modern times, it is not impossible for transnational terrorist organizations to procure nuclear capabilities. Since these organizations are largely decentralized, a retaliatory bombing is not likely to ensure their complete destruction. Furthermore, the existence of suicide bombers demonstrates that a mutual destruction is not nearly the same threat to many of our enemies as it is to us. Though deterrence proved to be an appropriate model for peace and stability during the Cold War, it is clear that the dynamics of the world have changed. Mutual destruction is not an assuredly credible threat and retaliation may not always be possible.
November 18th, 2007 at 7:08 pm
It almost looks like the baby in the Dr. Sigmund Rascher picture can sense his evil.
November 18th, 2007 at 7:12 pm
OK, its obvious Rascher was a creepozoid just from that picture.
November 18th, 2007 at 7:32 pm
I don’t agree with Oppenheimer, Nobel or Kevorkian. Kevorkian did not harm people in the same sense as the others on the list. He helped people do something to end their pain. His motivation and caring, even if misplaced by some standards, does not make him a “mad” scientist.
Nobel created a tool that we used to better society for years. There is no way the majority of roads in the west (USA) would be built without it. I could also argue that mining ores would be even more back breaking labor without his invention.
Oppenhiemer did physics. That was his main cause in life. Yes, he was part of a team of scientists that created a horrible weapon. That horible weapon was used by others. Should more blame go the the pilot of the Enola Gay then? What about the military leaders who used it? Why isn’t the inventor of the gun or smokepowder on this list with that criteria? Saying he was the lead scientist also fails to hold mustard. It was good old Albert E’s calculations of mass and energy Oppenheimer directly used to build the thing. This arguement of a mad scientist also gets muddy with the idea of how many more people would have died without it being used to end WWII.
November 18th, 2007 at 7:37 pm
‘Useless’ I would say that Lysenko deserves to be on the list. His claims about harvesting were used in China’s ‘Great Leap Forward’ Campaign in 1958. That means he is responsible (along with Mao) for 30-40 million deaths.
November 18th, 2007 at 7:58 pm
Mmmmm I think that you forgot somebody. Thomas Migdley, who was considered the most harmful human being of the planet. He worked for General Motors and discovered that the Lead (chemical element) reduced the vibrations in the engines, so he invented a new chemical based on this element, that later and since then companies started to use for fuel creation. We now the rest…
Oh but it doesn’t finishes here!!!! The refridgerators of his time used some very poisonous gases that killed people, so he found a new gas chemical that people could breath without any problem: the CFC’s(Chlorofluorocarbons), the main reason why we have an enormous hole at the ozone layer…
So his inventions, polluted the air at a massive scale and destroyed part of the sky… I don’t know something more evil than that…
November 18th, 2007 at 9:40 pm
OK, in light of this new information Lysenko probably did earn his place on this list.
November 19th, 2007 at 4:15 am
Assuming Economy as a sciencie, id add to this list all the “brains” behind IMF.
Back in 2000/2001, their recipies leaded to a major break in the bank system in Argentina,the people werent able to withdraw their deposits, and president was kicked out (we had 7 presidents that week)
IMF lately assumed they were wrong in this particular case.
November 19th, 2007 at 4:35 am
As noted above, you soft-pedaled Trofim Lysenko. While he had the Soviets bumbling around trying to grow wheat in snow — real fields were not being planted and real people were starving.
November 19th, 2007 at 4:36 am
Daidalos was in fact evil, he killed his nephew Perdix (sometimes called Talos) out of jealousy.
November 19th, 2007 at 5:16 am
How could have you forgotten Shiro Ishii and his Unit 731?! Mengele was an amateur compared to Shiro.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shirō_Ishii
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_731
November 19th, 2007 at 5:25 am
JF: Please visit the following site: http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/Top/experiments/P0 listing 20 bizarre experiments. Check #3 about the two-headed dog. That guy’s list-worthy. Others too, more than Nobel or Kervorkian (watch someone die slowly and painfully and suggest this guy’s evil)
Also, in defense of Nobel: if two brothers (among others) willingly participate in a risky experiment or business and one of them dies, is the other evil? Top 10 evil? It wasn’t like his brother was forced into this risky venture that led to explosives used as much in construction as deconstruction. The evil is in its use (which is why I don’t have too much issue with Oppenheimer).
November 19th, 2007 at 5:34 am
Wow, we seemed to have been instructed by the same English teacher. I’ve noticed that an English rule I was taught is now the EXACT OPPOSITE. A rule broken only by the dumbest in the class who were LAUGHED at by all the rest who got it right on a test (merely because it was similar to losing 5 points for forgetting to write your NAME!) A broken rule which now makes this acceptable Paracelsus’s – s apostrophe s – I am sorry, but this is pronounced Paracelsuseses – and – looks STUPID. Thanks for being one of the many who remember it correctly and refuse to change. (I know it’s nitpicking but it just looks stupid, and is a pet peeve of mine.)
November 19th, 2007 at 5:43 am
Black Lutefisk: I have seen that list – it is amazing! Thanks. Also, Nobel is on the list not for the death of his brother as much as the death that resulted from his creation over time.
November 19th, 2007 at 5:44 am
davor: Thank you for mentioning Shirō Ishii – I had not heard of him until your comment and I am horrified! He now has (rightfully) first place on this list.
November 19th, 2007 at 6:08 am
good list, shiro ishii was a total asshole, I cant believe he did not pay for his crime, This type of thing encourage more people to become criminals because the guy dint pay for his crime.
November 19th, 2007 at 8:43 am
I disagree with the meaning of ‘evil’ as described in this list. Oppenheimer and Nobel (after a cursory glance) do not seem to be evil. They researched and discovered new technology. While their work eventually was used in horrible ways, they did not personally perform evil acts in the way of a Josef Mengela.
While dynamite and the atomic bomb were designed as military weapons, their use extends beyond evil. The work of poor science combined with human torture should be reserved to be evil.
November 19th, 2007 at 10:15 am
Nobel is definitely not evil. While he may have killed his brother, he did not do so deliberately.
Joseph Mengele did do one good thing: he provided the inspiration for the excellent Slayer song ‘Angel of Death’
November 19th, 2007 at 11:47 am
Weren’t a lot of those Japanese scientists brought to America after the war? I’m sure a government agency used their results because they could never have done so, probably the CIA, during the f”’ed up 50’s experiments.
How the hell did Oppenheimer escape the McCarthy era? Surely out of all the innocent people imprisoned a guilty man like him would have been found out
November 19th, 2007 at 1:39 pm
Oppenheimer should not be on this list, he was a scientist doing the best he could among many others like Feynman. At the time he did it because everybody was convinced that it was the right thing to do, the idea of nuclear weapons was in the air for quite some time and many (including Einstein) feard that germany, japan or the soviet union would get there first.
Oppenheimer felt guilty for the rest of his life and became a strong activist against nuclear weapons.
JMurf, Oppenheimer didn’t escape de McCarty era, in fact he sufferd a lot, specialy when he started defending investigation on the medical uses of nuclear knowledge. Today many treatments for cancer and tumors depends on this knowledge, not to mention CAT scans.
Teller on the other hand was nuts, he even investigated the possibility of making a bomb that would destroy the whole planet and defended doing nuclear tests on the moon.
By the way, i didn’t get what’s so evil about Paracelsus.
P.S. – sorry for any ortographic errors, english is not my first language.
November 19th, 2007 at 6:28 pm
MAN, you guys can’t ever do stupid frothy frivolous lists like the crap over at Cracked.com. No, it’s gotta be 10 MOST EVIL SCIENTISTS — whip that lid off Pandora’s box one more time.
First off, I’m squarely in the Oppenheimer-doesn’t- belong camp. Far too many people, from Rutherford to Einstein to Fermi (and you know, poor Nobel’s invention is an integral part of the A-bomb, too) and policy makers like FDR and Harry Truman, had a hand in the bomb’s genesis. The Germans were very close with their deuterium experiments near WWII’s end, and it was absolutely imperative that we beat them to it and actually use it. The bomb is a stepping stone of technological progress, and I believe it will one day have incalculably valuable peacetime uses, especially in space. Now, Edward Teller is very likely the more evil of the two men; for years there has been speculation that he and the German engineer Julius Fuchs, NOT the Rosenbergs, were the traitors who handed bomb technology over to the Soviets; Teller had made himself too valuable as a researcher and administrator, so the Rosenbergs went to the chair as expendables. But none of that is nailed down, confirmed history, so … Moving on:
I don’t really think Kevorkian belongs on the list either, unless someone can prove to me that the people at whose deaths he assisted were not of sufficient mental competence to make such decisions. He is a dissident on the issue of what it means when we say life is sacred. Is someone riddled with agonizing cancer really to be kept alive because religious bodies insist it is God’s Will? Or do they have a right to death with dignity? He has flouted federal and state laws many times, with as much visibility as possible, in acts of what I would term civil disobedience. He’s a scary-looking critter, I’ll grant you, but I don’t quite accept that what he does is evil, IF the people he’s hooked up to his apparatus made their choices while of sound mind.
Next, Alfred Nobel. Dr. N did not conceive of the prize that bears his name to divert attention from his horrible invention, which is used for construction, demolition and mining as much as for warfare. When he saw how quickly TNT was being turned to uses of explosive ordnance, he founded the prize in remorse; I don’t know, J and Stew, your version sounds kinda revisionist to me, and I’d never seen it anywhere else. Maybe it’s me, but I’ll stick to the old version unless you can turn me on to some really convincing documentation.
I liked Charly’s nomination of Thomas Midgley — DAMN good point. Now here’s my nominee: Edison. The guy stole from nearly everyone who worked for him, is the true godfather of the electric chair (just so he could stick it to George Westinghouse and sink alternating current, and put the screws to Tesla while he was at it), and — you want nutty? Was trying to create a device for communicating with the dead. (Yes, I know, now we have people researching Electronic Voice Phenomena, as seen in “The Sixth Sense” and “White Noise.” I don’t usually debunk paranormal phenomena or studies, but — Edison?)
And there’s no reason to pick on Daedalus, whether or not he has a historical footprint. Guy lost his kid, for God’s sake, have a heart!
November 19th, 2007 at 11:36 pm
Martin L: ah – Edison is an excellent mention – he was a thief and a liar.
November 20th, 2007 at 7:16 am
Interesting that my little dust up with Randall has been removed. It’s ok, I didn’t read much after I was told to bugger off. *snicker*
Didn’t know Edison was such a sneaky bastard, I’ll have to read up. . .
November 20th, 2007 at 7:50 am
bucslim: I haven’t removed anything – unfortunately some comments and one or two user registrations were lost because of the time it takes for the new servers to take effect. It should all be pretty much okay from now on (we are now running on a new server cluster with a new host).
November 20th, 2007 at 8:00 am
j – I thought that might have something to do with it. But it’s all good man. You’re doing a great job – the site is like crack for working joes like me.
November 20th, 2007 at 8:06 am
bucslim: thanks
It has been quite a big job – but thankfully today we are pretty much back to normal and publishing again
November 20th, 2007 at 8:20 am
Oppenheimer should not be on this list. If you research him you’ll find that he was horrified by the atomic bomb and that he has never a communist, he was just caught up in the Red Scare.
November 20th, 2007 at 8:54 am
One thingi bet you didnt know about Oppenheimer: he patented a suit which consisted of a hat connected to a parachute and boots with 1 ft thick soles to allow fire victims to jump from their building unharmed. it failed.
November 20th, 2007 at 9:04 am
DRay: he testified that he was involved with the communist praty before Senate…
ben hahaha how ridiculous!
November 20th, 2007 at 11:42 am
Thanks for that Tig Avl, but did he get imprisoned for his actions? can’t think of the name[s] but didn’t someone die during the era for supposedly communist beliefs, if so it strikes me he didnt
November 20th, 2007 at 6:22 pm
I love how you call great scientists ‘evil’ just to spark debate on your site. How about a real list?
I have to say… i’ve been a fan of your site for along time- my english isn’t great but i find these really fun and easy to read.
WORST LIST EVER! Evil??? Give me a break! Do more research before you tread on the memories of great men.
November 20th, 2007 at 6:32 pm
Pete: Looks like his strategy “to spark debate” worked
November 21st, 2007 at 10:13 pm
what about “Wouter Basson” the white south african apartheid chemical scientist that made a formula that only attacks red bloodcells of black people and is harmless to whites?
November 22nd, 2007 at 10:00 pm
I don’t know about y’all..but I’m kind of happy no one came in here trying to say the Holocaust didn’t exist and that Sigmund is being wrongfully accused…i think it was from the top ten most evil women there was that one guy who kept on denying it.
November 28th, 2007 at 8:23 pm
Nobel never invented Dynamite for the use of a weapon explosive, he invented it for the hope of making mining a much easier job. And he didn’t create the Nobel prize during his lifetime, IT WAS IN HIS WILL! Other than that, good list.
December 7th, 2007 at 7:42 am
Why is Oppenheimer on this list? He helped create a bomb which killed half a million people. This was used instead of a Japanese invasion which would have killed 5 million people.
December 28th, 2007 at 8:47 pm
Oppenheimer shouldn’t be on this list. They have excellent mutual funds.
January 17th, 2008 at 10:13 pm
To those who think Kevorkian doesn’t belong on this list: I’m not going to disagree, but please consider there’s a difference between a patient refusing medical treatment, assisted suicide, and euthenasia (sp?). In my opinion, assisted suicide is wrong. All it is is suicide with a little outside help. And suicide is generally thought to be a bad idea, and the attempt is met with psychiatric evaluations and therapy to help resolve issues. And isn’t suicide just self-murder. Murder is a crime that can result in capital punishment for the perpatrator, due to his being a danger to society. In my opinion, what Dr. Kevorkian did was assisted suicide, bordering on euthanasia. Maybe his patients asked for his help, but it was still the killing of the elderly and infirm, a practice that merges with genocide in some cultures. I don’t believe that Kevorkian thought he was doing wrong, but his actions and his intentions are two different things.
February 27th, 2008 at 2:55 pm
if it wasn’t for these mad scientits we wouldn’t know everything we know now about science
February 28th, 2008 at 3:26 pm
What about the group of scientists that accidentally created the AIDs virus? The government wont reveal their identities, because a few of those researchers are still alive.
February 28th, 2008 at 3:32 pm
Joey11y: Come now, Joey. You can’t actually believe the AIDs virus was created in a laboratory. That is utter nonsense. Do some real research, for cripessake.
February 29th, 2008 at 3:13 am
Nice list! It is just so horrible to know that despite the fact that science is invented to study about facts for the benefit of the people, people themselves used science for such heinous things.
About vivisecting, yes, it is for research purposes. But, instead of using innocent people for something so gruesome, why didn’t they use the bodies of evil people to do this? It is the evil that must suffer such pain and get retribution, and, through this method, people can still benefit from the same research.
February 29th, 2008 at 11:02 am
Putting Oppenheimer, Noble and Kevorkian on this list is absurd. Lysenko also was more of a Lamarkian idiot than evil.
February 29th, 2008 at 9:25 pm
what about the dude who invented chemical warfare?
March 10th, 2008 at 4:45 pm
for number 3 did you mean hitler
March 30th, 2008 at 9:30 am
Actually, the Hippocratic oath that Kevorkian and all doctors take does not pledge to save lives it says “First, do no harm”. Allowing people to choose the time of their own death and to do so with dignity and self-worth is far better than causing the harm of forcing them to stay alive as long as possible with no hope of recovery and only pain and debilitation to look forward to.
March 30th, 2008 at 10:39 am
Only in a religious context can a man who attempts to ease pain, suffering, injustice and indignity (Dr. Kevorkian) be labeled “evil”. Religion and it’s fanatics invert everthing that they touch. Perverse.
March 30th, 2008 at 10:41 am
Kevorkian has more integrity in his little toe than all of his detractors combined.
April 3rd, 2008 at 10:16 am
Scary list,You should feature old lists like this if you can Jamie, I think at least.
May 4th, 2008 at 8:02 pm
Regarding the Tusgkeege Experiments:
“It would be easy to dismiss this as a case of simple racism by a public institution, but that is not the case: The project was enthusiastically hosted by the Tuskeegee Institute, a historically black college, and many key researchers and staff on the project were, themselves, black.”
The fact that black people were involved in the commission of the study does not absolve it of its core racism.
The high level CDC decision makers were still White and they chose to continue funding the study despite ethical concerns.
Not saying the black doctors and researchers are free from guilt. Just that you can’t flat out say its not “racism” just cause blacks were in the mix as well.
I see this argument all the time and often it fails to take into account the “big picture”: That institutionalized racism comes from the top and affects everyone.
May 23rd, 2008 at 10:03 am
I’m so gutted you would put Kevorkian on this list. He is utterly misplaced here. Controversial scientists yes, but not ‘evil’.
FJ
May 25th, 2008 at 9:11 pm
Very funny!!! Rascher definitely does not deserve to be on the list.
May 27th, 2008 at 4:35 am
Alfred nobel?
June 2nd, 2008 at 5:46 am
If you all don’t agree with this list so much, why don’t you go to write your own?
Interesting list. I may not agree with all of the entries, but I’m not going to complain about them here. Instead I plan on doing my own research. So thanks for sparking my interest
June 3rd, 2008 at 9:40 am
I 100% agree with “Fe” about Kevorkian. He was only trying to help people.
June 4th, 2008 at 8:42 pm
Oppenheimer is a terrible choice for this article. Many scientists were conflicted on the Manhattan project. In the end, many decided that it was the lesser of two evils to trust the bomb to the Americans instead of the Nazis. In fact, Oppenheimer was one of the scientists who signed the Szilard petition, begging Truman not to drop the bomb. It was signed by 67 of the top minds involved.
After the bomb was dropped, even Teller admitted that it was a mistake not to show Truman the petition. Oppenheimer was very concerned about the ethical consequences of nuclear weapons. The petition claimed that the spread of nuclear weapons would one day put American cities at an even greater risk than the Nazis ever did. Of course, they were right; look at what’s happening today in Iran, North Korea, Syria, etc…
June 5th, 2008 at 2:57 pm
To Bruno: Nuclear deterrence is NOT outdated. We surely need to consider transnational terrorist organizations as a potentially new threat not explained in the model, but you can’t forget that that’s not the only way a nuclear catasthrophe could occur in today’s world. You can’t forget the conflict between India and Pakistan, between North Korea and its neighbors, and the very serious threat arising from Iran gaining nuclear capability and blowing Israel to pieces. Now, do you really think these countries wouldn’t destroy each other if it wasn’t for nuclear deterrence? As long as nations with nuclear capabilities are in conflict, deterrence will be relevant. And for the terrorist organizations…well, that’s a tough one. It’s very possible that a nuclear core from any of the countries of the former Soviet Union might fall into terrorist hands and there’s so much we can do to stop them…a bleak prospect indeed.
June 12th, 2008 at 6:40 pm
Where’s Sir Francis Galton? The inventor of eugenics?
July 3rd, 2008 at 3:20 am
Mengele should be #1 Shipman #2
July 3rd, 2008 at 3:21 am
Nobel and Oppenhiemer weren’t evil
July 14th, 2008 at 2:06 am
ive said this once before, (comment #62)
why is the dude that developed chemical warfare in WWI not on here?
i apologize for not giving a name but i forgot what it was
July 29th, 2008 at 8:23 am
6.Dr. Jack Kevorkian
The comment “Regardless of your views on euthanasia, the fact remains that Kevorkian swore an oath to save lives, not to take them.” is incredibly trite. An oath taken at one point in a person’s past does not override convictions and personal beliefs that might develop in the future.
September 3rd, 2008 at 2:34 pm
what about Maxim. his machine gun was the invention most responsible for the carnage in WWI. Even worse, he invented it purely for the make a money.
September 8th, 2008 at 6:19 pm
Dear lord! Alfred Nobel on the same list as Mengele, and Shiro Ishii? Calling Nobel evil for inventing dynamite would be the same as call Henry Ford evil for allowing the mass production of cars, or Marconi evil because the wireless paved the way for military radios and air strikes, or even Prometheus evil for bringing fire to the world.
September 26th, 2008 at 1:32 am
#5. “… go on national television, show the world what you did …”
Apparently, national TV reaches the world.
October 18th, 2008 at 1:12 am
That poor baby looks terrified.
October 28th, 2008 at 3:06 pm
Nobel invented dynamite for mining not killing. He was horified when he discovered it was being used to kill people.
November 8th, 2008 at 2:11 am
Alfred Nobel’s invention of dynamite was actually intended to save lives. It replaced the much more unstable nitroglycerine that was used in mining.
The “inventor” of chemical warfare was Fritz Haber, who provided chlorine gas that the Germans used in WWI. (Ironically, he was expelled from Germany by the Nazis because he was Jewish.)
Midgley developed CFC’s as a refrigerant gas to replace ammonia and sulfur dioxide. Many people had died when their refrigeration units developed leaks. At that time, CFC’s were considered non-poisonous and extremely stable. It was decades later that CFC’s effects on the ozone layer were discovered. Since I think “evil” is based on motivation, I can’t consider Midgley evil.
November 30th, 2008 at 4:23 pm
just one correction: Daedaulus didn’t create the wings to escape the Labyrinth. He created them so he and his son, Icarus, could escape Crete, where King Minos was holding them against their will.
he’s not really evil, either. He warned Icarus about flying too high, or too low. The story is a metaphor for living a balanced life. And also to not fuck with nature.
heh.
January 22nd, 2009 at 12:02 pm
Dr. Oppenheimer was not an evil scientist. If you had read ANYTHING about the man, you would know that. I’m no expert, but I just read “The Making Of The Atomic Bomb”, which profiles him well. Above all else, he wanted the atomic bomb to END war. He figured, nobody would be stupid enough to fight eachother if everyone had one.
Too bad he was wrong. But that doesn’t make him evil.
p.s., from the above mentioned book I learned that the Manhattan Project helped invent Teflon. They needed something to hold their machines together that wouldn’t interact with the plutonium, and so they created a hard, see through, very slick plastic. Oila, teflon.
January 31st, 2009 at 5:36 am
You have to put Dr. Gregory Pincus who promote de contraceptive pills trials in the women of La Perla, Puerto Rico. La Perla is a very, very low income community. You can check in the web the horrible effects of the trial on them.
February 12th, 2009 at 10:00 pm
Being evil is when you do something that you know is wrong, with the intention of it being wrong. Oppenheimer and Noble were not evil.
February 16th, 2009 at 8:51 am
I don’t think Oppenheimer or Nobel were evil, really. I also don’t think Kevorkian is evil though you may disagree with his views. I wouldn’t class him as a scientist, either.
March 4th, 2009 at 5:36 pm
Glad to see Ishii and Mengele here
March 8th, 2009 at 8:40 am
Nobel was not evil – towards the rest of his life he deadicated all his money, to the nobel prize award where they et grants for reseach. His own resarch killed his own brother in one of his factorys
March 22nd, 2009 at 9:32 am
the third picture scares the living hell out of me
April 8th, 2009 at 5:25 pm
i totally agree with Ishii and Mengele they were crazy and the bad thing is…….. Ishii never got prosucuted or even any jail-time for all the horrible things he did. But I don’t think that Oppenheimer did this for the fun of it, they paid him to make this bomb, I think?
April 14th, 2009 at 9:56 pm
“The comment “Regardless of your views on euthanasia, the fact remains that Kevorkian swore an oath to save lives, not to take them.” is incredibly trite. An oath taken at one point in a person’s past does not override convictions and personal beliefs that might develop in the future.”
^I 100% agree.
If its really about the oath, I don’t see how breaking it can make someone one of the top ten most “evil scientists” ever.
April 14th, 2009 at 9:59 pm
So if the US president changed his mind about upholding the constitution after he has sworn an oath, it is okay for him to dump the lot and pass unconstitutional laws? I guess we might as well just dispense with oaths entirely then – and the whole thing about “honor”.
April 15th, 2009 at 9:41 pm
wow!!!!!never knew an ancient character in Greek mythology is cruel!!!but how come that his story is popular in children books…this give a bad lesson to children
April 21st, 2009 at 2:02 pm
97. jfrater
I almost fell over when I read that post about oaths not meaning anything for the future. Being a doctor means upholding that oath, otherwise you have NO right to call yourself one. I guess your example abot the US president really sums it up nicely!
PS- That baby in the Rascher really does look scared to death! Poor thing…
PPS- It seems incredible that the US would grant amnisty to people working in Area 731. It´s condoning crimes against humanity…
April 26th, 2009 at 8:09 am
4. Johann Konrad Dippel 1673-1734
Working with nitroglycerin he destroyed a tower, but also detected the medicinal use of it.
That’s funny, cause I believe nitroglycerin was invented by Ascanio Sobrero, who was born in 1812, thus after Johann Konrad Dippel died…
April 27th, 2009 at 2:52 pm
openheimer doesn’t desrve to be here, yes he did an unspeakably bad thing by inventing the atom bomb but realised his mistake and spent the rest of his life trying to put it right. he did a bad thing but was not evil by any measure.
well done for putting shiro ishii at 1 not mengele, he was easily worse
May 2nd, 2009 at 6:28 am
Thanks for this enlightening blog. Howbeit I’m afraid you’re only scratching the surface here, as only time will reveal what scientists have been up to during the past few decades…
May 20th, 2009 at 3:31 pm
I disagree with Oppenheimer, Nobel, and Kevorkian. But I’m glad you put Ishii before Mengele. Especially because Ishii never even had to go into hiding for his crimes.
July 11th, 2009 at 11:15 am
This is a good list but the picture on number 3 scared the crap out of me. You could see fear in the baby’s eyes.
August 31st, 2009 at 1:24 pm
I protest your use of the word “evil.” I don’t think it means what you think it means.
September 3rd, 2009 at 1:15 pm
What is the criteria of this list? Some of the choices is really stupid. If Nobel was evil for making dynamite then Karl Benz should be evil too for making the automobile. Evevy years there are hundred thousands of people die/injured from car accidents.
If you can’t find enough evil science list, please make a shorter list. Don’t just put anyone you can think of here.
September 3rd, 2009 at 8:53 pm
I’m sorry, I feel like, at least with Oppenheimer, Nobel, and Kevorkian–I don’t know enough about the others–this article is very biased and one-handed.
You didn’t mention the fact that one of Oppenheimer’s reasons for doing the project was he felt that the atomic bomb would be so destructive no one would ever allow it to be used (aka go to war) again. The fact that he was in “Communist circles” has very little to do with anything. It’s a political affiliation, just like Democrat, Socialist, or Republican.
Nobel didn’t have to set up a fund to reward bright minds in science, politics, and other areas that fostered or promoted peace, helping people, and generally trying to make the world better. But he did it anyway. If he was truly evil, he would have found another way to “distract” people, I’m sure. Or more appropriately for evil, probably, he wouldn’t have cared.
Kevorkian was just trying to help people die dignified–with the people themselves in control. You pointed out that he swore to save life, not end it. Call me pessimistic–but if I couldn’t do anything, was dying painfully or slowly, or couldn’t do the things I wanted to do because my body was withering right before me–I’d consider the end a -saving- grace.
—
If anything, I would consider these three people tragic characters, not evil ones.
September 11th, 2009 at 4:44 am
I really hate dr. mengele he is extremely EVIL he use his power to kill innocent lives and then Dissect it… it is an Absolute inhumanity!!! what a Obnoxious character and to Nobel he only discover discover Dynamite in our own Image..
Annoyed with dr. Kevorkian
September 12th, 2009 at 4:16 pm
Oppenheimer, Nobel and Kevorkian in same company as Mengele?? This list is absolutely idiotic.
#106 Nelly is right. Even Einstein should be on this list based on the moronic logic used.
September 12th, 2009 at 11:48 pm
I see now, Oppenheimer was evil because he was Communist… Why didn’t I realise? It was barely about the bombs at all, why bother even including them?
One dependant clause about the bombs, but one complex sentence about him being a Communist? A bit paranoid still, the Cold War’s over, we won…
September 13th, 2009 at 1:15 pm
is this real or fake
October 8th, 2009 at 11:45 am
scientist are not evil! they are only good! thats the evil christian way of thinking of it!
i dont care if they killed babies, rape people or torcher people, if its in the name of science it must be ok.
November 2nd, 2009 at 9:42 pm
I disagree with Oppenheimer, he shouldn’t be on this list at all. He was a pretty interesting guy, and if you about his life post nuclear bomb, he was essentially leading the fight to stop any development of the H bomb. He was destroyed by the government for this, essentially destroying his credibility. Also, he did not advocate for the USE of the bomb, creating the bomb was a necessary political move, using it not so much.
November 25th, 2009 at 7:37 am
Kevorkian shouldn’t be on here. A doctor’s job shouldn’t be to save lives, it should be to attempt to make someone’s quality of life better. If he can’t and that patient wants to die rather than endure days, months, or even years of suffering, he should help them do so. If you keep that person around while they suffer like that, you are extraordinarily selfish. Even if you don’t agree with my view, Kevorkian is far from ‘evil.’ Controversial perhaps, but not evil. Not by a long shot.
December 23rd, 2009 at 2:56 pm
Nobel created nitro for the mining industry. The use of nitro as explosives for armaments did not come from Nobel any more than the use of gunpowder as an explosive came from the Chinese. To paint him as an “evil scientist” is a bit of a stretch. Nitro had many non-military uses which greatly benefited mankind.
December 27th, 2009 at 3:54 am
Nobel’s evil? Really now…I recall reading about him in school achieving the Nobel Prize (well…yeah) and that his invention of dynamite was for good purposes, but he didn’t realize it became a deadly weapon for war and such things.
January 1st, 2010 at 12:31 am
Man, I’m shocked of what they had done. And I can’t believe they would also invent those bad stuff. They deserve to go to hell.
January 4th, 2010 at 10:48 am
only 5 – 1 are evil at all. this list sucks
January 7th, 2010 at 3:32 am
Nobel did no evil, and what is this about his creation killed people over time.
The author of this thing must be kinda stupid, since dynamite is not used for warefare, and nitroglycerin was invented decades before. Half of the people you have on the list was never evil or will nor be called it by history.
Should for example the inventor or mathematics be called evil since economy has killed more people than any other science.(economics is the foundation of having religion by those who preach it)
January 8th, 2010 at 11:19 am
Half of the people on this list are not evil nor mad. The author on the other hand is a retard and probably mad.
By far the biggest fuckup by the author is to put Alfred Nobel on the list. Nobel was a pacifist and the dynamite was an improvement over the extremely dangerous nitroglycerin that, as mentioned before, was used in the mining industry. There was never a thought from the inventor to use dynamite as a weapon. Nobel was horrified when he heard that his invention was used to harm people, thats why he made up the Nobel Peace Prize; ever heard of that one?
January 15th, 2010 at 10:00 am
No, Nobel accidentally killed his brother through a fuckup with nitroglycerin, created dynamite as a safer alternative, and set up the Nobel Prizes to promote the advancement of science, literature, medicine and peace and to make the world a better place. I’m slightly disgusted that he’s considered evil by anyone.
January 31st, 2010 at 11:18 pm
This list is moronic. Listing Oppenheimer instead of Teller just shows what a pig whoever made this list is. That or a moron.