Throughout time, scientist of one school or another have contributed great innovations to the world of medicine, alchemy, chemistry, physics, and more. Most of these gifts have been exceedingly useful and set the stage for even greater advances in the field. However, the coin has another side… a far more sinister and selfish side that somehow twists the very minds of the scientists making them want to do more harm than help. Granted, said scientific minds often believe that the evils that they are ultimately performing are doing good, and this is what truly makes these individuals mad. Here are ten of the most diabolical scientific minds in history.
10. Paracelsus 1493-1541
Switzerland, Paracelsus’ contributions to toxicology were based heavily in astrology and he is quite well known for offering the community a wide array of useful ideas and innovations. However, for all of his use, he also thought he might be able to create homunculi, or small humans, who stood no more than a foot or so hight and performed actions very similar to Golems. His are said to have run away after turning on their master. The homunculus creation used bits of people including semen and hair.
9. Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer 1904-1967
Heading up the Manhattan Project, the very group responsible for the creation and use of the atomic bomb, Dr. Oppenheimer was a brilliant nuclear physicist. Oppenheimer said he was “a member of just about every Communist Front organization on the West Coast,” a subscriber to the People’s World, a Communist Party organ, and, he testified, “I was associated with the Communist movement.” He claimed to be horrified by the result of the project’s work. A co-worker, Victor Weisskopf said:
He did not direct from the head office. He was intellectually and even physically present at each decisive step. He was present in the laboratory or in the seminar rooms, when a new effect was measured, when a new idea was conceived. It was not that he contributed so many ideas or suggestions; he did so sometimes, but his main influence came from something else. It was his continuous and intense presence, which produced a sense of direct participation in all of us; it created that unique atmosphere of enthusiasm and challenge that pervaded the place throughout its time.
8. Alfred Nobel 1833-1897
Discovering the use of nitroglycerine in his invention of dynamite, Nobel gave the world its first mass-produced use of deadly explosives. Killing first his own brother Emil and several others in a factory accident, the future death toll from his creation will number in the hundreds of thousands. Eventually he used his significant earned wealth to fund the yearly Nobel Prize to distract people from his invention, after reading his own obituary (mistakenly printed as he was not actually dead) which called him the “Merchant of Death”.
7. Trofim Lysenko
While his experiments did not result in mass deaths, Lysenko needs to be on this list for his utter dishonesty in the field of Science that ultimately set the Soviet Union back decades in research. Lysenko was director of the Institute of Genetics and specialized in agricultural research. Lysenko’s habit was to report only successes. His results were based on extremely small samples, inaccurate records, and the almost total absence of control groups. There can be no doubt that there has never been such an abuse of the name of science as that of Lysenko. Here is a quote:
“In order to obtain a certain result, You must want to obtain precisely that result; if you want to obtain a certain result, you will obtain it …. I need only such people as will obtain the results I need.” Lysenko
6. Dr. Jack Kevorkian 1928
Kevorkian is most noted for publicly championing a terminal patient’s right to die via physician-assisted suicide and claims to have assisted at least 130 patients to that end. Imprisoned in 1999, he served eight years out of his 10-to-25-year prison sentence for second-degree murder in the 1998 poisoning of Thomas Youk, 52, of Oakland County, Michigan. The judge that convicted him said:
“You were on bond to another judge when you committed this offense, you were not licensed to practice medicine when you committed this offense and you hadn’t been licensed for eight years. And you had the audacity to go on national television, show the world what you did and dare the legal system to stop you. Well, sir, consider yourself stopped.”
Regardless of your views on euthanasia, the fact remains that Kevorkian swore an oath to save lives, not to take them.
5. Members of the Tuskegee Study
For forty years between 1932 and 1972, the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) conducted an experiment on 399 black men (mostly impoverished and poorly educated share-croppers) in the late stages of syphilis. The essence was to gather data on the course of the disease when left untreated. The researchers understood from the outset that test subjects would provide most of their useful information in the form of autopsies, so great pains were taken to insure that subjects didn’t obtain medical care elsewhere. The program came to an abrupt halt in 1972 when its existence was made public by the Washington Star. It would be easy to dismiss this as a case of simple racism by a public institution, but that is not the case: The project was enthusiastically hosted by the Tuskeegee Institute, a historically black college, and many key researchers and staff on the project were, themselves, black.
4. Johann Konrad Dippel 1673-1734
Dippel was born at Castle Frankenstein and is rumored to be the inspiration for Shelley’s vile doctor. This is disputable, but what isn’t is the fact that this brilliant doctor performed vivisections on many recipients. Working with nitroglycerin he destroyed a tower, but also detected the medicinal use of it. It is rumored that he also preformed gruesome experiments within this tower with so called “cadavers”. Though the actual details of the experiments have never been truly confirmed it is rumored that he attempted to transfer the soul of one cadaver into another. Interestingly, his greatest contribution to the world was his animal oil (Dippel’s oil: a nitrogenous by-product of the destructive distillation manufacture of bone char) commonly known as a base product in Prussian blue – the low cost blue dye that is used to this day by artists; previously, blue dies were extremely expensive to create.
3. Dr. Sigmund Rascher 1909-1945
Rascher was a despicable scientist during the Nazi use of concentration camps during WWII. Rascher’s infamous medical experiments at the Dachau concentration camp included hypothermia research in which three hundred test subjects were used against their will (one third of them perished), in high-altitude, malaria and medication experiments. At Dachau, Rascher also developed the standard cyanide capsules, which could be easily bitten through, either deliberately or accidentally. Ironically, this became the means by which Himmler (Rascher’s friend) committed suicide.
2. Dr. Joseph Mengele 1911-1979
Mengele gained notoriety chiefly for being one of the SS physicians who supervised the selection of arriving transports of prisoners, determining who was to be killed and who was to become a forced laborer, and for performing human experiments on camp inmates, amongst whom Mengele was known as the Angel of Death. On several occasions he killed subjects simply to be able to dissect them afterwards.
1. Shirō Ishii 1892-1959
Ishii was a microbiologist and the lieutenant general of Unit 731, a biological warfare unit of the Imperial Japanese Army during the Second Sino-Japanese War. He was born in the former Shibayama Village of Sanbu District in Chiba Prefecture, and studied medicine at Kyoto Imperial University. In 1932, he began his preliminary experiments in biological warfare as a secret project for the Japanese military. In 1936, Unit 731 was formed. Ishii built a huge compound — more than 150 buildings over six square kilometers — outside the city of Harbin, China.
Some of the numerous atrocities committed by Ishii and others under his command in Unit 731 include: vivisection of living people (including pregnant women who were impregnated by the doctors), prisoners had limbs amputated and reattached to other parts of their body, some prisoners had parts of their bodies frozen and thawed to study the resulting untreated gangrene. Humans were also used as living test cases for grenades and flame throwers. Prisoners were injected with inoculations of disease, disguised as vaccinations, to study their effects. To study the effects of untreated venereal diseases, male and female prisoners were deliberately infected with syphilis and gonorrhea via rape, then studied. A complete list of these horrors can be found here.
Having been granted immunity by the American Occupation Authorities at the end of the war, Ishii never spent any time in jail for his crimes and died at the age of 67 of throat cancer.
Bonus: Daedalus
Granted he is a character of legend, but Daedalus deserves a place on any list of this type because he is probably the first recorded mad/evil scientist. Daedalus is often credited with inventing the very first labyrinth in which he imprisoned the step-son of King Minos, a minotaur. He is also, sadly, charged with killing his own son, though inadvertently, by creating Icarus and himself a set of wings used to escape his very own labyrinth. Icarus didn’t heed his father’s warnings about flying too close to the sun, thus melting his wings and plummeting to the earth.































hmm…interesting…nobel was evil?
no. His invention was misused and he did not try to kill people. That part is false.
I would say that even Kevorkian wasn't evil because is it not true that any dignified person should be able to die in the way that they wish? Kevorkian killed those who wanted to die and there is nothing wrong with that.
ikr??? that’s pathetic!
Fruckert: his obituary did call him the merchant of death! It is more the consequence of his invention that is evil though – it even killed his own brother.
oh – and I am surprised he was the first one picked out for controversy – I expected it to be Oppenheimer.
but would u really consider Oppenheimer evil? i mean he made the A-bomb, but never used it. If Oppenheimer is an evil scientist then wouldn’t Leonardo Da Vinci be evil as well, or Albert Enstin since he helped him ?
i was just mildly surprised, although my lack of history knowledge is probably to blame for that
Well- if nothing else I hope the lists are at least partially educational
I agree that Mengele should be the worst. I did a paper on him my freshman year of HS and he was NUTS!
see, no one knows about shiro ishii, whose labors (if you take them to be evil) matched or surpassed mengele's. few people know about either; those who do have a shallow knowledge at most.
why do fewer people know about shiro ishii than mengele? simply because the media portrayed one and not the other. my textbook talked about dr death, as I'm sure your's did too. but ishii was ignored.
i apologize for the double post but why do you think that Oppenheimer was going to be the first controversial subject? he invented the most devastating weapon from what i know, that is until someone invents the sattelite laser…then were going to go all starcraft on eachother and own EVERYONE…
why cant i edit?
I have to respectfully disagree about Kevorkian, because I don’t see the evil in allowing people to choose how they will end their lives. I’ve always thought that ‘do no harm’ would be better expressed with ‘allow no harm’. Which causes more harm, allowing someone to choose to end the pain or abdicating responsibility by bleating ‘do no harm’ and condemning someone to live out their days in pain?
Also, I would have put Oppenheimer closer to the top of the list, but that’s my personal feelings. As horrible as the Holocaust was and I fully agree the men responsible are among the most evil creatures ever spawned, Oppenheimer basically gave us the keys to the gun cabinet and showed us how to load an Ak-47.
Come on, Teller was way more evil than Oppenheimer!
Note, the black male physician in the Tuskegee photo was not involved with the study. The black female nurse, however, was involved with it for its entire duration.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_Study_of_Untreated_Syphilis_in_the_Negro_Male
Oppenheimer over Teller? He should really be on the list, he was nuts and he loved H-bombs.
“Over the course of his life, Teller was known both for his scientific ability and his difficult interpersonal relations and volatile personality, and is considered one of the inspirations for the character Dr. Strangelove in the 1964 movie of the same name.”
Why is Bill Nye the Science Guy not on here….he was EVIL!
I also disagree about Kevorkian. Do you really think its “evil” to allow a terminally ill person to die with dignity and end their own suffering? Your description of him makes it sound like he killed people for the Hell of it, or just to ***** off the medical establishment. You also gloss over the fact that his machine is quick and painless and that he only allows those of sound mind to use it.
I say no to Oppenheimer’s inclusion. To start with, the Nazis almost had the bomb by the end of WWII and the USSR would have gotten it anyway without Oppenheimer’s work. The atomic bomb has only been used twice and, IMAO, was the right move but that is a different discussion.
To compare the bomb to an AK-47 is facetious at best, if not pure demagoguery. An atomic bomb is extremely difficult to construct and maintain even with the correct blueprints. Thus, it is simply impossible to for it to be created by anyone other than a nation, and a powerful (and thus hopefully competent) nation at that. Due to MADD (mutually assured destruction), nuclear nations won’t attack each other. Some (not including myself since it’s a complicated topic) would even go as far as to say the bomb has made the world far safer than ever.
I would say that Daedelus, Oppenheimer, Kevorkian and Lysenko do not deserve to be on this list.
Wow, good list. I agree with all of them. And I know that my high school history teachers did not fail me– I have heard of nearly all of these people and what they did! Horrific.
My junior high school (now called a middle school) was named for Nobel. I had no idea he did such evil things.
Nobel wasn't evil god damit. He just found out about dynamite before anyone else. It's how other people used his invention that was evil. The poor bastard even thought that explosives like this would end all war because – who'd wanna fight when your whole army could be wiped out in a matter of hours"?"
Bruno: Nuclear deterrence, as a theory, is outdated. It assumes that all nuclear agents are stable and rational-minded, that they are concentrated in one area, and that they, too, would be fearful of mutual destruction. In modern times, it is not impossible for transnational terrorist organizations to procure nuclear capabilities. Since these organizations are largely decentralized, a retaliatory bombing is not likely to ensure their complete destruction. Furthermore, the existence of suicide bombers demonstrates that a mutual destruction is not nearly the same threat to many of our enemies as it is to us. Though deterrence proved to be an appropriate model for peace and stability during the Cold War, it is clear that the dynamics of the world have changed. Mutual destruction is not an assuredly credible threat and retaliation may not always be possible.
It almost looks like the baby in the Dr. Sigmund Rascher picture can sense his evil.
OK, its obvious Rascher was a creepozoid just from that picture.
I don’t agree with Oppenheimer, Nobel or Kevorkian. Kevorkian did not harm people in the same sense as the others on the list. He helped people do something to end their pain. His motivation and caring, even if misplaced by some standards, does not make him a “mad” scientist.
Nobel created a tool that we used to better society for years. There is no way the majority of roads in the west (USA) would be built without it. I could also argue that mining ores would be even more back breaking labor without his invention.
Oppenhiemer did physics. That was his main cause in life. Yes, he was part of a team of scientists that created a horrible weapon. That horible weapon was used by others. Should more blame go the the pilot of the Enola Gay then? What about the military leaders who used it? Why isn’t the inventor of the gun or smokepowder on this list with that criteria? Saying he was the lead scientist also fails to hold mustard. It was good old Albert E’s calculations of mass and energy Oppenheimer directly used to build the thing. This arguement of a mad scientist also gets muddy with the idea of how many more people would have died without it being used to end WWII.
‘Useless’ I would say that Lysenko deserves to be on the list. His claims about harvesting were used in China’s ‘Great Leap Forward’ Campaign in 1958. That means he is responsible (along with Mao) for 30-40 million deaths.
Mmmmm I think that you forgot somebody. Thomas Migdley, who was considered the most harmful human being of the planet. He worked for General Motors and discovered that the Lead (chemical element) reduced the vibrations in the engines, so he invented a new chemical based on this element, that later and since then companies started to use for fuel creation. We now the rest…
Oh but it doesn’t finishes here!!!! The refridgerators of his time used some very poisonous gases that killed people, so he found a new gas chemical that people could breath without any problem: the CFC’s(Chlorofluorocarbons), the main reason why we have an enormous hole at the ozone layer…
So his inventions, polluted the air at a massive scale and destroyed part of the sky… I don’t know something more evil than that…
it took years for any of that stuff to happen. theres no way he could have known what he was doing. how is that anywhere near as evil as performing the experiments that ichii or mengele performed?
OK, in light of this new information Lysenko probably did earn his place on this list.
Assuming Economy as a sciencie, id add to this list all the “brains” behind IMF.
Back in 2000/2001, their recipies leaded to a major break in the bank system in Argentina,the people werent able to withdraw their deposits, and president was kicked out (we had 7 presidents that week)
IMF lately assumed they were wrong in this particular case.
As noted above, you soft-pedaled Trofim Lysenko. While he had the Soviets bumbling around trying to grow wheat in snow — real fields were not being planted and real people were starving.
Daidalos was in fact evil, he killed his nephew Perdix (sometimes called Talos) out of jealousy.
How could have you forgotten Shiro Ishii and his Unit 731?! Mengele was an amateur compared to Shiro.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shirō_Ishii
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_731
JF: Please visit the following site: http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/Top/experiments/P0 listing 20 bizarre experiments. Check #3 about the two-headed dog. That guy’s list-worthy. Others too, more than Nobel or Kervorkian (watch someone die slowly and painfully and suggest this guy’s evil)
Also, in defense of Nobel: if two brothers (among others) willingly participate in a risky experiment or business and one of them dies, is the other evil? Top 10 evil? It wasn’t like his brother was forced into this risky venture that led to explosives used as much in construction as deconstruction. The evil is in its use (which is why I don’t have too much issue with Oppenheimer).
Wow, we seemed to have been instructed by the same English teacher. I’ve noticed that an English rule I was taught is now the EXACT OPPOSITE. A rule broken only by the dumbest in the class who were LAUGHED at by all the rest who got it right on a test (merely because it was similar to losing 5 points for forgetting to write your NAME!) A broken rule which now makes this acceptable Paracelsus’s – s apostrophe s – I am sorry, but this is pronounced Paracelsuseses – and – looks STUPID. Thanks for being one of the many who remember it correctly and refuse to change. (I know it’s nitpicking but it just looks stupid, and is a pet peeve of mine.)
Black Lutefisk: I have seen that list – it is amazing! Thanks. Also, Nobel is on the list not for the death of his brother as much as the death that resulted from his creation over time.
davor: Thank you for mentioning Shirō Ishii – I had not heard of him until your comment and I am horrified! He now has (rightfully) first place on this list.
good list, shiro ishii was a total *****, I cant believe he did not pay for his crime, This type of thing encourage more people to become criminals because the guy dint pay for his crime.
I disagree with the meaning of ‘evil’ as described in this list. Oppenheimer and Nobel (after a cursory glance) do not seem to be evil. They researched and discovered new technology. While their work eventually was used in horrible ways, they did not personally perform evil acts in the way of a Josef Mengela.
While dynamite and the atomic bomb were designed as military weapons, their use extends beyond evil. The work of poor science combined with human torture should be reserved to be evil.
Nobel is definitely not evil. While he may have killed his brother, he did not do so deliberately.
Joseph Mengele did do one good thing: he provided the inspiration for the excellent Slayer song ‘Angel of Death’
Weren’t a lot of those Japanese scientists brought to America after the war? I’m sure a government agency used their results because they could never have done so, probably the CIA, during the f”’ed up 50′s experiments.
How the hell did Oppenheimer escape the McCarthy era? Surely out of all the innocent people imprisoned a guilty man like him would have been found out
Oppenheimer should not be on this list, he was a scientist doing the best he could among many others like Feynman. At the time he did it because everybody was convinced that it was the right thing to do, the idea of nuclear weapons was in the air for quite some time and many (including Einstein) feard that germany, japan or the soviet union would get there first.
Oppenheimer felt guilty for the rest of his life and became a strong activist against nuclear weapons.
JMurf, Oppenheimer didn’t escape de McCarty era, in fact he sufferd a lot, specialy when he started defending investigation on the medical uses of nuclear knowledge. Today many treatments for cancer and tumors depends on this knowledge, not to mention CAT scans.
Teller on the other hand was nuts, he even investigated the possibility of making a bomb that would destroy the whole planet and defended doing nuclear tests on the moon.
By the way, i didn’t get what’s so evil about Paracelsus.
P.S. – sorry for any ortographic errors, english is not my first language.
MAN, you guys can’t ever do stupid frothy frivolous lists like the crap over at Cracked.com. No, it’s gotta be 10 MOST EVIL SCIENTISTS — whip that lid off Pandora’s box one more time.
First off, I’m squarely in the Oppenheimer-doesn’t- belong camp. Far too many people, from Rutherford to Einstein to Fermi (and you know, poor Nobel’s invention is an integral part of the A-bomb, too) and policy makers like FDR and Harry Truman, had a hand in the bomb’s genesis. The Germans were very close with their deuterium experiments near WWII’s end, and it was absolutely imperative that we beat them to it and actually use it. The bomb is a stepping stone of technological progress, and I believe it will one day have incalculably valuable peacetime uses, especially in space. Now, Edward Teller is very likely the more evil of the two men; for years there has been speculation that he and the German engineer Julius Fuchs, NOT the Rosenbergs, were the traitors who handed bomb technology over to the Soviets; Teller had made himself too valuable as a researcher and administrator, so the Rosenbergs went to the chair as expendables. But none of that is nailed down, confirmed history, so … Moving on:
I don’t really think Kevorkian belongs on the list either, unless someone can prove to me that the people at whose deaths he assisted were not of sufficient mental competence to make such decisions. He is a dissident on the issue of what it means when we say life is sacred. Is someone riddled with agonizing cancer really to be kept alive because religious bodies insist it is God’s Will? Or do they have a right to death with dignity? He has flouted federal and state laws many times, with as much visibility as possible, in acts of what I would term civil disobedience. He’s a scary-looking critter, I’ll grant you, but I don’t quite accept that what he does is evil, IF the people he’s hooked up to his apparatus made their choices while of sound mind.
Next, Alfred Nobel. Dr. N did not conceive of the prize that bears his name to divert attention from his horrible invention, which is used for construction, demolition and mining as much as for warfare. When he saw how quickly TNT was being turned to uses of explosive ordnance, he founded the prize in remorse; I don’t know, J and Stew, your version sounds kinda revisionist to me, and I’d never seen it anywhere else. Maybe it’s me, but I’ll stick to the old version unless you can turn me on to some really convincing documentation.
I liked Charly’s nomination of Thomas Midgley — DAMN good point. Now here’s my nominee: Edison. The guy stole from nearly everyone who worked for him, is the true godfather of the electric chair (just so he could stick it to George Westinghouse and sink alternating current, and put the screws to Tesla while he was at it), and — you want nutty? Was trying to create a device for communicating with the dead. (Yes, I know, now we have people researching Electronic Voice Phenomena, as seen in “The Sixth Sense” and “White Noise.” I don’t usually debunk paranormal phenomena or studies, but — Edison?)
And there’s no reason to pick on Daedalus, whether or not he has a historical footprint. Guy lost his kid, for God’s sake, have a heart!
Martin L: ah – Edison is an excellent mention – he was a thief and a liar.
Interesting that my little dust up with Randall has been removed. It’s ok, I didn’t read much after I was told to bugger off. *snicker*
Didn’t know Edison was such a sneaky bastard, I’ll have to read up. . .
bucslim: I haven’t removed anything – unfortunately some comments and one or two user registrations were lost because of the time it takes for the new servers to take effect. It should all be pretty much okay from now on (we are now running on a new server cluster with a new host).
j – I thought that might have something to do with it. But it’s all good man. You’re doing a great job – the site is like crack for working joes like me.
bucslim: thanks
It has been quite a big job – but thankfully today we are pretty much back to normal and publishing again
Oppenheimer should not be on this list. If you research him you’ll find that he was horrified by the atomic bomb and that he has never a communist, he was just caught up in the Red Scare.
One thingi bet you didnt know about Oppenheimer: he patented a suit which consisted of a hat connected to a parachute and boots with 1 ft thick soles to allow fire victims to jump from their building unharmed. it failed.
DRay: he testified that he was involved with the communist praty before Senate…
ben hahaha how ridiculous!
Thanks for that Tig Avl, but did he get imprisoned for his actions? can’t think of the name[s] but didn’t someone die during the era for supposedly communist beliefs, if so it strikes me he didnt
I love how you call great scientists ‘evil’ just to spark debate on your site. How about a real list?
I have to say… i’ve been a fan of your site for along time- my english isn’t great but i find these really fun and easy to read.
WORST LIST EVER! Evil??? Give me a break! Do more research before you tread on the memories of great men.
Pete: Looks like his strategy “to spark debate” worked
what about “Wouter Basson” the white south african apartheid chemical scientist that made a formula that only attacks red bloodcells of black people and is harmless to whites?
I don’t know about y’all..but I’m kind of happy no one came in here trying to say the Holocaust didn’t exist and that Sigmund is being wrongfully accused…i think it was from the top ten most evil women there was that one guy who kept on denying it.
Nobel never invented Dynamite for the use of a weapon explosive, he invented it for the hope of making mining a much easier job. And he didn’t create the Nobel prize during his lifetime, IT WAS IN HIS WILL! Other than that, good list.
Why is Oppenheimer on this list? He helped create a bomb which killed half a million people. This was used instead of a Japanese invasion which would have killed 5 million people.
Oppenheimer shouldn’t be on this list. They have excellent mutual funds.
To those who think Kevorkian doesn’t belong on this list: I’m not going to disagree, but please consider there’s a difference between a patient refusing medical treatment, assisted suicide, and euthenasia (sp?). In my opinion, assisted suicide is wrong. All it is is suicide with a little outside help. And suicide is generally thought to be a bad idea, and the attempt is met with psychiatric evaluations and therapy to help resolve issues. And isn’t suicide just self-murder. Murder is a crime that can result in capital punishment for the perpatrator, due to his being a danger to society. In my opinion, what Dr. Kevorkian did was assisted suicide, bordering on euthanasia. Maybe his patients asked for his help, but it was still the killing of the elderly and infirm, a practice that merges with genocide in some cultures. I don’t believe that Kevorkian thought he was doing wrong, but his actions and his intentions are two different things.
if it wasn’t for these mad scientits we wouldn’t know everything we know now about science
What about the group of scientists that accidentally created the AIDs virus? The government wont reveal their identities, because a few of those researchers are still alive.
Joey11y: Come now, Joey. You can’t actually believe the AIDs virus was created in a laboratory. That is utter nonsense. Do some real research, for cripessake.
Nice list! It is just so horrible to know that despite the fact that science is invented to study about facts for the benefit of the people, people themselves used science for such heinous things.
About vivisecting, yes, it is for research purposes. But, instead of using innocent people for something so gruesome, why didn’t they use the bodies of evil people to do this? It is the evil that must suffer such pain and get retribution, and, through this method, people can still benefit from the same research.